From 217d71c48a10265e08b95cc961656b921f61f9ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: 6543 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 14:42:18 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Workaround to clean up old reviews on creating a new one (#28554) close #28542 blocks #28544 --- *Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH* --- models/issues/review.go | 40 ++++++- models/unittest/unit_tests.go | 8 +- tests/integration/api_pull_review_test.go | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/models/issues/review.go b/models/issues/review.go index 3aa9d3e2a8..fc110630e0 100644 --- a/models/issues/review.go +++ b/models/issues/review.go @@ -292,8 +292,14 @@ func IsOfficialReviewerTeam(ctx context.Context, issue *Issue, team *organizatio // CreateReview creates a new review based on opts func CreateReview(ctx context.Context, opts CreateReviewOptions) (*Review, error) { + ctx, committer, err := db.TxContext(ctx) + if err != nil { + return nil, err + } + defer committer.Close() + sess := db.GetEngine(ctx) + review := &Review{ - Type: opts.Type, Issue: opts.Issue, IssueID: opts.Issue.ID, Reviewer: opts.Reviewer, @@ -303,15 +309,39 @@ func CreateReview(ctx context.Context, opts CreateReviewOptions) (*Review, error CommitID: opts.CommitID, Stale: opts.Stale, } + if opts.Reviewer != nil { + review.Type = opts.Type review.ReviewerID = opts.Reviewer.ID - } else { - if review.Type != ReviewTypeRequest { - review.Type = ReviewTypeRequest + + reviewCond := builder.Eq{"reviewer_id": opts.Reviewer.ID, "issue_id": opts.Issue.ID} + // make sure user review requests are cleared + if opts.Type != ReviewTypePending { + if _, err := sess.Where(reviewCond.And(builder.Eq{"type": ReviewTypeRequest})).Delete(new(Review)); err != nil { + return nil, err + } } + // make sure if the created review gets dismissed no old review surface + // other types can be ignored, as they don't affect branch protection + if opts.Type == ReviewTypeApprove || opts.Type == ReviewTypeReject { + if _, err := sess.Where(reviewCond.And(builder.In("type", ReviewTypeApprove, ReviewTypeReject))). + Cols("dismissed").Update(&Review{Dismissed: true}); err != nil { + return nil, err + } + } + + } else if opts.ReviewerTeam != nil { + review.Type = ReviewTypeRequest review.ReviewerTeamID = opts.ReviewerTeam.ID + + } else { + return nil, fmt.Errorf("provide either reviewer or reviewer team") } - return review, db.Insert(ctx, review) + + if _, err := sess.Insert(review); err != nil { + return nil, err + } + return review, committer.Commit() } // GetCurrentReview returns the current pending review of reviewer for given issue diff --git a/models/unittest/unit_tests.go b/models/unittest/unit_tests.go index d47bceea1e..75898436fc 100644 --- a/models/unittest/unit_tests.go +++ b/models/unittest/unit_tests.go @@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ func AssertSuccessfulInsert(t assert.TestingT, beans ...any) { } // AssertCount assert the count of a bean -func AssertCount(t assert.TestingT, bean, expected any) { - assert.EqualValues(t, expected, GetCount(t, bean)) +func AssertCount(t assert.TestingT, bean, expected any) bool { + return assert.EqualValues(t, expected, GetCount(t, bean)) } // AssertInt64InRange assert value is in range [low, high] @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ func GetCountByCond(t assert.TestingT, tableName string, cond builder.Cond) int6 } // AssertCountByCond test the count of database entries matching bean -func AssertCountByCond(t assert.TestingT, tableName string, cond builder.Cond, expected int) { - assert.EqualValues(t, expected, GetCountByCond(t, tableName, cond), +func AssertCountByCond(t assert.TestingT, tableName string, cond builder.Cond, expected int) bool { + return assert.EqualValues(t, expected, GetCountByCond(t, tableName, cond), "Failed consistency test, the counted bean (of table %s) was %+v", tableName, cond) } diff --git a/tests/integration/api_pull_review_test.go b/tests/integration/api_pull_review_test.go index daa136b21e..ab6d33cd5b 100644 --- a/tests/integration/api_pull_review_test.go +++ b/tests/integration/api_pull_review_test.go @@ -13,11 +13,14 @@ import ( issues_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/issues" repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo" "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest" + user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user" "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/json" api "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs" + issue_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/issue" "code.gitea.io/gitea/tests" "github.com/stretchr/testify/assert" + "xorm.io/builder" ) func TestAPIPullReview(t *testing.T) { @@ -314,3 +317,126 @@ func TestAPIPullReviewRequest(t *testing.T) { AddTokenAuth(token) MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent) } + +func TestAPIPullReviewStayDismissed(t *testing.T) { + // This test against issue https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28542 + // where old reviews surface after a review request got dismissed. + defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)() + pullIssue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 3}) + assert.NoError(t, pullIssue.LoadAttributes(db.DefaultContext)) + repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: pullIssue.RepoID}) + user2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2}) + session2 := loginUser(t, user2.LoginName) + token2 := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session2, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository) + user8 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 8}) + session8 := loginUser(t, user8.LoginName) + token8 := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session8, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository) + + // user2 request user8 + req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{ + Reviewers: []string{user8.LoginName}, + }).AddTokenAuth(token2) + MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated) + + reviewsCountCheck(t, + "check we have only one review request", + pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 0, 1, 1, false) + + // user2 request user8 again, it is expected to be ignored + req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{ + Reviewers: []string{user8.LoginName}, + }).AddTokenAuth(token2) + MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated) + + reviewsCountCheck(t, + "check we have only one review request, even after re-request it again", + pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 0, 1, 1, false) + + // user8 reviews it as accept + req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.CreatePullReviewOptions{ + Event: "APPROVED", + Body: "lgtm", + }).AddTokenAuth(token8) + MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK) + + reviewsCountCheck(t, + "check we have one valid approval", + pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 0, 0, 1, true) + + // emulate of auto-dismiss lgtm on a protected branch that where a pull just got an update + _, err := db.GetEngine(db.DefaultContext).Where("issue_id = ? AND reviewer_id = ?", pullIssue.ID, user8.ID). + Cols("dismissed").Update(&issues_model.Review{Dismissed: true}) + assert.NoError(t, err) + + // user2 request user8 again + req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/requested_reviewers", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.PullReviewRequestOptions{ + Reviewers: []string{user8.LoginName}, + }).AddTokenAuth(token2) + MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated) + + reviewsCountCheck(t, + "check we have no valid approval and one review request", + pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 1, 1, 2, false) + + // user8 dismiss review + _, err = issue_service.ReviewRequest(db.DefaultContext, pullIssue, user8, user8, false) + assert.NoError(t, err) + + reviewsCountCheck(t, + "check new review request is now dismissed", + pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 1, 0, 1, false) + + // add a new valid approval + req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.CreatePullReviewOptions{ + Event: "APPROVED", + Body: "lgtm", + }).AddTokenAuth(token8) + MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK) + + reviewsCountCheck(t, + "check that old reviews requests are deleted", + pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 1, 0, 2, true) + + // now add a change request witch should dismiss the approval + req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls/%d/reviews", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name, pullIssue.Index), &api.CreatePullReviewOptions{ + Event: "REQUEST_CHANGES", + Body: "please change XYZ", + }).AddTokenAuth(token8) + MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK) + + reviewsCountCheck(t, + "check that old reviews are dismissed", + pullIssue.ID, user8.ID, 2, 0, 3, false) +} + +func reviewsCountCheck(t *testing.T, name string, issueID, reviewerID int64, expectedDismissed, expectedRequested, expectedTotal int, expectApproval bool) { + t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) { + unittest.AssertCountByCond(t, "review", builder.Eq{ + "issue_id": issueID, + "reviewer_id": reviewerID, + "dismissed": true, + }, expectedDismissed) + + unittest.AssertCountByCond(t, "review", builder.Eq{ + "issue_id": issueID, + "reviewer_id": reviewerID, + }, expectedTotal) + + unittest.AssertCountByCond(t, "review", builder.Eq{ + "issue_id": issueID, + "reviewer_id": reviewerID, + "type": issues_model.ReviewTypeRequest, + }, expectedRequested) + + approvalCount := 0 + if expectApproval { + approvalCount = 1 + } + unittest.AssertCountByCond(t, "review", builder.Eq{ + "issue_id": issueID, + "reviewer_id": reviewerID, + "type": issues_model.ReviewTypeApprove, + "dismissed": false, + }, approvalCount) + }) +}