Commit Graph

241 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
KN4CK3R
b1d8f13bd0
Protected tag is no internal server error (#30962)
Fixes #30959

Adds an API test for protected tags.
Fix existing tag in combination with fixtures.
2024-05-14 06:48:21 +00:00
silverwind
9b2536b78f
Update misspell to 0.5.1 and add misspellings.csv (#30573)
Misspell 0.5.0 supports passing a csv file to extend the list of
misspellings, so I added some common ones from the codebase. There is at
least one typo in a API response so we need to decided whether to revert
that and then likely remove the dict entry.
2024-04-27 08:03:49 +00:00
Denys Konovalov
e5160185ed
Add default board to new projects, remove uncategorized pseudo-board (#29874)
On creation of an empty project (no template) a default board will be
created instead of falling back to the uneditable pseudo-board.

Every project now has to have exactly one default boards. As a
consequence, you cannot unset a board as default, instead you have to
set another board as default. Existing projects will be modified using a
cron job, additionally this check will run every midnight by default.

Deleting the default board is not allowed, you have to set another board
as default to do it.

Fixes #29873
Fixes #14679 along the way
Fixes #29853

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-03-27 20:54:32 +00:00
wxiaoguang
828701ff2d
Fix template error when comment review doesn't exist (#29888)
Fix #29885
2024-03-19 04:19:48 +00:00
oliverpool
26653b196b
Store webhook event in database (#29145)
Refactor the webhook logic, to have the type-dependent processing happen
only in one place.

---

## Current webhook flow

1. An event happens
2. It is pre-processed (depending on the webhook type) and its body is
added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, some more logic (depending on the webhook
type as well) is applied to make an HTTP request

This means that webhook-type dependant logic is needed in step 2 and 3.
This is cumbersome and brittle to maintain.

Updated webhook flow with this PR:
1. An event happens
2. It is stored as-is and added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, the event is processed (depending on the
webhook type) to make an HTTP request

So the only webhook-type dependent logic happens in one place (step 3)
which should be much more robust.

## Consequences of the refactor

- the raw event must be stored in the hooktask (until now, the
pre-processed body was stored)
- to ensure that previous hooktasks are correctly sent, a
`payload_version` is added (version 1: the body has already been
pre-process / version 2: the body is the raw event)

So future webhook additions will only have to deal with creating an
http.Request based on the raw event (no need to adjust the code in
multiple places, like currently).

Moreover since this processing happens when fetching from the task
queue, it ensures that the queuing of new events (upon a `git push` for
instance) does not get slowed down by a slow webhook.

As a concrete example, the PR #19307 for custom webhooks, should be
substantially smaller:
- no need to change `services/webhook/deliver.go` 
- minimal change in `services/webhook/webhook.go` (add the new webhook
to the map)
- no need to change all the individual webhook files (since with this
refactor the `*webhook_model.Webhook` is provided as argument)
2024-03-07 23:18:38 +01:00
Denys Konovalov
1f0625a277
Fix projects mode bugs (#29593)
Fix for regressions introduced by #28805 

Enabled projects on repos created before the PR weren't detected. Also,
the way projects mode was detected in settings didn't match the way it
was detected on permission check, which leads to confusion.

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2024-03-04 20:49:21 +00:00
KN4CK3R
c337ff0ec7
Add user blocking (#29028)
Fixes #17453

This PR adds the abbility to block a user from a personal account or
organization to restrict how the blocked user can interact with the
blocker. The docs explain what's the consequence of blocking a user.

Screenshots:


![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1666336/4ed884f3-e06a-4862-afd3-3b8aa2488dc6)


![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1666336/ae6d4981-f252-4f50-a429-04f0f9f1cdf1)


![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1666336/ca153599-5b0f-4b4a-90fe-18bdfd6f0b6b)

---------

Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2024-03-04 08:16:03 +00:00
Denys Konovalov
fe6792dff3
Enable/disable owner and repo projects independently (#28805)
Part of #23318 

Add menu in repo settings to allow for repo admin to decide not just if
projects are enabled or disabled per repo, but also which kind of
projects (repo-level/owner-level) are enabled. If repo projects
disabled, don't show the projects tab.


![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/47871822/b9b43fb4-824b-47f9-b8e2-12004313647c)

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-03-04 02:56:52 +00:00
ChristopherHX
a53d268aca
Actions Artifacts v4 backend (#28965)
Fixes #28853 

Needs both https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/473 and
https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/471 on the runner side and
patched `actions/upload-artifact@v4` / `actions/download-artifact@v4`,
like `christopherhx/gitea-upload-artifact@v4` and
`christopherhx/gitea-download-artifact@v4`, to not return errors due to
GHES not beeing supported yet.
2024-03-02 09:12:17 +00:00
Zettat123
c42083a339
Allow non-admin users to delete review requests (#29057)
Fix #14459

The following users can add/remove review requests of a PR
- the poster of the PR
- the owner or collaborators of the repository
- members with read permission on the pull requests unit
2024-02-24 12:38:43 +00:00
qwerty287
0a426cc575
Add API to get merged PR of a commit (#29243)
Adds a new API `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/commits/{sha}/pull` that allows
you to get the merged PR associated to a commit.

---------

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2024-02-24 08:18:39 +00:00
KN4CK3R
f8b471ace1
Unify user update methods (#28733)
Fixes #28660
Fixes an admin api bug related to `user.LoginSource`
Fixed `/user/emails` response not identical to GitHub api

This PR unifies the user update methods. The goal is to keep the logic
only at one place (having audit logs in mind). For example, do the
password checks only in one method not everywhere a password is updated.

After that PR is merged, the user creation should be next.
2024-02-04 13:29:09 +00:00
Mihir Joshi
b8270240bf
Fix reverting a merge commit failing (#28794)
Fixes #22236

---
Error occurring currently while trying to revert commit using read-tree
-m approach:
> 2022/12/26 16:04:43 ...rvices/pull/patch.go:240:AttemptThreeWayMerge()
[E] [63a9c61a] Unable to run read-tree -m! Error: exit status 128 -
fatal: this operation must be run in a work tree
> 	 - fatal: this operation must be run in a work tree

We need to clone a non-bare repository for `git read-tree -m` to work.

bb371aee6e
adds support to create a non-bare cloned temporary upload repository.

After cloning a non-bare temporary upload repository, we [set default
index](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/main/services/repository/files/cherry_pick.go#L37)
(`git read-tree HEAD`).
This operation ends up resetting the git index file (see investigation
details below), due to which, we need to call `git update-index
--refresh` afterward.


Here's the diff of the index file before and after we execute
SetDefaultIndex: https://www.diffchecker.com/hyOP3eJy/

Notice the **ctime**, **mtime** are set to 0 after SetDefaultIndex.

You can reproduce the same behavior using these steps:
```bash
$ git clone https://try.gitea.io/me-heer/test.git -s -b main
$ cd test
$ git read-tree HEAD
$ git read-tree -m 1f085d7ed8 1f085d7ed8 9933caed00
error: Entry '1' not uptodate. Cannot merge.
```

After which, we can fix like this:
```
$ git update-index --refresh
$ git read-tree -m 1f085d7ed8 1f085d7ed8 9933caed00
```
2024-01-16 15:06:51 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
882e502327
Fix comment permissions (#28213)
This PR will fix some missed checks for private repositories' data on
web routes and API routes.
2023-11-25 17:21:21 +00:00
Nanguan Lin
80a0ab350b
Add unit tests for action runner token (#27670)
In case the behavior of the register token changes.
2023-10-19 07:24:24 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
439a0cca2c
Test more templates for if they contain an error (#27367) 2023-10-02 07:56:55 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
6e87a44034
Allow get release download files and lfs files with oauth2 token format (#26430)
Fix #26165
Fix #25257
2023-10-01 10:41:52 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
eab20cb6bd
Fix more yaml lint errors (#27284)
Fix #27268
2023-09-26 12:56:42 -04:00
Nanguan Lin
2f8e1604f8
Fix review request number and add more tests (#27104)
fix #27019 
## testfixture yml
1. add issue20(a pr issue) in repo 23, org 17
2. add user15 to team 9
3. add four reviews about issue20
## test case
add two tests that are described with code comments
the code before pr #26784 failed the first test
<img width="479" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/1d9b5787-11b4-4c4d-931f-6a9869547f35">
current code failed the second test(as mentioned in #27019)
<img width="484" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/05608055-7587-43d1-bae1-92c688270819">
Any advice is appreciated.

---------

Co-authored-by: CaiCandong <50507092+CaiCandong@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-09-21 13:59:50 +02:00
Nanguan Lin
da50be7360
Replace 'userxx' with 'orgxx' in all test files when the user type is org (#27052)
Currently 'userxx' and 'orgxx' are both used as username in test files
when the user type is org, which is confusing. This PR replaces all
'userxx' with 'orgxx' when the user type is org(`user.type==1`).
Some non-trivial changes
1. Rename `user3` dir to `org3` in `tests/git-repositories-meta` 
2. Change `end` in `issue reference` because 'org3' is one char shorter
than 'user3'

![ksnip_20230913-112819](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/442988c5-4cf4-49b8-aa01-4dd6bf0ca954)
3. Change the search result number of `user/repo2` because
`user3/repo21` can't be searched now

![ksnip_20230913-112931](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/d9ebeba4-479f-4110-9a85-825efbc981fd)
4. Change the first org name getting from API because the result is
ordered by alphabet asc and now `org 17` is before `org25`
![JW8U7NIO(J$H
_YCRB36H)T](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/f55a685c-cf24-40e5-a87f-3a2327319548)
![)KFD411O4I8RB5ZOH7E0
Z3](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/a0dc3299-249c-46f6-91cb-d15d4ee88dd5)

Other modifications are just find all and replace all.
Unit tests with SQLite are all passed.

---------

Co-authored-by: caicandong <1290147055@qq.com>
2023-09-14 02:59:53 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
ebff0513db
Fix context cache bug & enable context cache for dashabord commits' authors (#26991)
Unfortunately, when a system setting hasn't been stored in the database,
it cannot be cached.
Meanwhile, this PR also uses context cache for push email avatar display
which should avoid to read user table via email address again and again.

According to my local test, this should reduce dashboard elapsed time
from 150ms -> 80ms .
2023-09-11 10:14:01 +00:00
CaiCandong
815d267c80
Fix verifyCommits error when push a new branch (#26664)
> ### Description
> If a new branch is pushed, and the repository has a rule that would
require signed commits for the new branch, the commit is rejected with a
500 error regardless of whether it's signed.
> 
> When pushing a new branch, the "old" commit is the empty ID
(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000). verifyCommits has no
provision for this and passes an invalid commit range to git rev-list.
Prior to 1.19 this wasn't an issue because only pre-existing individual
branches could be protected.
> 
> I was able to reproduce with
[try.gitea.io/CraigTest/test](https://try.gitea.io/CraigTest/test),
which is set up with a blanket rule to require commits on all branches.


Fix #25565
Very thanks to @Craig-Holmquist-NTI for reporting the bug and suggesting
an valid solution!

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-08-30 02:27:53 +00:00
puni9869
cafce3b4b5
Allow to archive labels (#26478)
## Archived labels 

This adds the structure to allow for archived labels.
Archived labels are, just like closed milestones or projects, a medium to hide information without deleting it.
It is especially useful if there are outdated labels that should no longer be used without deleting the label entirely.

## Changes

1. UI and API have been equipped with the support to mark a label as archived
2. The time when a label has been archived will be stored in the DB

## Outsourced for the future

There's no special handling for archived labels at the moment.
This will be done in the future.

## Screenshots

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/80308335/208f95cd-42e4-4ed7-9a1f-cd2050a645d4)

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/80308335/746428e0-40bb-45b3-b992-85602feb371d)

Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-08-14 11:56:14 +02:00
Earl Warren
20f47bbca9
fix generated source URL on rendered files (#26364)
- The permalink and 'Reference in New issue' URL of an renderable file
(those where you can see the source and a rendered version of it, such
as markdown) doesn't contain `?display=source`. This leads the issue
that the URL doesn't have any effect, as by default the rendered version
is shown and thus not the source.
- Add `?display=source` to the permalink URL and to 'Reference in New
Issue' if it's renderable file.
- Add integration testing.

Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1088

Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-08 09:04:04 +00:00
Zettat123
b33cf4fabc
Fix access check for org-level project (#26182)
Fix #25934

Add `ignoreGlobal` parameter to `reqUnitAccess` and only check global
disabled units when `ignoreGlobal` is true. So the org-level projects
and user-level projects won't be affected by global disabled
`repo.projects` unit.
2023-07-29 14:13:24 +00:00
sebastian-sauer
55532061c8
Add commits dropdown in PR files view and allow commit by commit review (#25528)
This PR adds a new dropdown to select a commit or a commit range
(shift-click like github) of a Pull Request.
After selection of a commit only the changes of this commit will be shown.
When selecting a range of commits the diff of this range is shown.

This allows to review a PR commit by commit or by viewing only commit ranges.
The "Show changes since your last review" mechanism github uses is implemented, too.
When reviewing a single commit or a commit range the "Viewed" functionality is disabled.

## Screenshots

### The commit dropdown

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/51889757/0db3ae62-1272-436c-be64-4730c5d611e3)

### Selecting a commit range

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/51889757/ad81eedb-8437-42b0-8073-2d940c25fe8f)

### Show changes of a single commit only

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/51889757/6b1a113b-73ef-4ecc-adf6-bc2340bb8f97)

### Show changes of a commit range

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/51889757/6401b358-cd66-4c09-8baa-6cf6177f23a7)


Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/20989
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/19263

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-07-28 21:18:12 +02:00
yp05327
44572e9243
Fix incorrect oldest sort in project list (#25806)
sort type `oldest` should be `Asc`.
Added a test for this.
2023-07-11 20:47:50 +02:00
KN4CK3R
321383db22
Revert package access change from #23879 (#25707)
Fixes (?) #25538
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/972

Regression #23879

#23879 introduced a change which prevents read access to packages if a
user is not a member of an organization.

That PR also contained a change which disallows package access if the
team unit is configured with "no access" for packages. I don't think
this change makes sense (at the moment). It may be relevant for private
orgs. But for public or limited orgs that's useless because an
unauthorized user would have more access rights than the team member.
This PR restores the old behaviour "If a user has read access for an
owner, they can read packages".

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-07-09 13:00:07 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
de981c39e6
Fix bug of branches API with tests (#25578)
Fix #25558
Extract from #22743

This PR added a repository's check when creating/deleting branches via
API. Mirror repository and archive repository cannot do that.
2023-07-01 10:52:52 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
6e19484f4d
Sync branches into databases (#22743)
Related #14180
Related #25233 
Related #22639
Close #19786
Related #12763 

This PR will change all the branches retrieve method from reading git
data to read database to reduce git read operations.

- [x] Sync git branches information into database when push git data
- [x] Create a new table `Branch`, merge some columns of `DeletedBranch`
into `Branch` table and drop the table `DeletedBranch`.
- [x] Read `Branch` table when visit `code` -> `branch` page
- [x] Read `Branch` table when list branch names in `code` page dropdown
- [x] Read `Branch` table when list git ref compare page
- [x] Provide a button in admin page to manually sync all branches.
- [x] Sync branches if repository is not empty but database branches are
empty when visiting pages with branches list
- [x] Use `commit_time desc` as the default FindBranch order by to keep
consistent as before and deleted branches will be always at the end.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-06-29 10:03:20 +00:00
Cory Todd
179704695c
Fix duplicate Reviewed-by trailers (#24796)
Enable deduplication of unofficial reviews. When pull requests are
configured to include all approvers, not just official ones, in the
default merge messages it was possible to generate duplicated
Reviewed-by lines for a single person. Add an option to find only
distinct reviews for a given query.

fixes #24795

---------

Signed-off-by: Cory Todd <cory.todd@canonical.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-09 16:34:49 +02:00
FuXiaoHei
c757765a9e
Implement actions artifacts (#22738)
Implement action artifacts server api.

This change is used for supporting
https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact and
https://github.com/actions/download-artifact in gitea actions. It can
run sample workflow from doc
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/storing-workflow-data-as-artifacts.
The api design is inspired by
https://github.com/nektos/act/blob/master/pkg/artifacts/server.go and
includes some changes from gitea internal structs and methods.

Actions artifacts contains two parts:

- Gitea server api and storage (this pr implement basic design without
some complex cases supports)
- Runner communicate with gitea server api (in comming)

Old pr https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22345 is outdated after
actions merged. I create new pr from main branch.


![897f7694-3e0f-4f7c-bb4b-9936624ead45](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2142787/219382371-eb3cf810-e4e0-456b-a8ff-aecc2b1a1032.jpeg)

Add artifacts list in actions workflow page.
2023-05-19 21:37:57 +08:00
oliverpool
8030614386
fix: release page for empty or non-existing target (#24470)
Fixes #24145

To solve the bug, I added a "computed" `TargetBehind` field to the
`Release` model, which indicates the target branch of a release.
This is particularly useful if the target branch was deleted in the
meantime (or is empty).

I also did a micro-optimization in `calReleaseNumCommitsBehind`. Instead
of checking that a branch exists and then call `GetBranchCommit`, I
immediately call `GetBranchCommit` and handle the `git.ErrNotExist`
error.

This optimization is covered by the added unit test.
2023-05-10 11:43:55 +08:00
wxiaoguang
e422342eeb
Allow adding new files to an empty repo (#24164)
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/232561612-2bfcfd0a-fc04-47ba-965f-5d0bcea46c54.png)
2023-04-19 21:40:42 +08:00
oliverpool
bb2783860b
fix calReleaseNumCommitsBehind (#24148)
`repoCtx.CommitsCount` is not reliably the commit count of the default
branch (Repository.GetCommitsCount depends on what is currently
displayed).

For instance on the releases page the commit count is correct:
https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/releases


![2023-04-15-215027](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3864879/232250500-6c05dc00-7030-4ec9-87f1-18c7797d36bf.png)

However it is not on the single page:
https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/releases/tag/v4.6.2


![2023-04-15-215036](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3864879/232250503-620c8038-7c2c-45a1-b99d-cb994ef955a6.png)

This PR fixes this by removing a "fast branch" which was using this
field (I think this field should be removed, since it is a bit
unpredictable - but this would mean a larger refactoring PR).

_contributed in the context of @forgejo_

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-04-18 21:11:17 +02:00
6543
88033438aa
Support "." char as user name for User/Orgs in RSS/ATOM/GPG/KEYS path ... (#23874)
- close #22301

workaround for https://github.com/go-chi/chi/issues/781
2023-04-07 18:08:36 +08:00
yp05327
bbf83f5d4b
Improve permission check of packages (#23879)
At first, we have one unified team unit permission which is called
`Team.Authorize` in DB.
But since https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/17811, we allowed
different units to have different permission.

The old code is only designed for the old version. So after #17811, if
org users have write permission of other units, but have no permission
of packages, they can also get write permission of packages.

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-04-06 22:18:29 +08:00
Nick
6aef9e0a2f
Replace repo.namedBlob by git.TreeEntry. (#22898)
`namedBlob` turned out to be a poor imitation of a `TreeEntry`. Using
the latter directly shortens this code.

This partially undoes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23152/,
which I found a merge conflict with, and also expands the test it added
to cover the subtle README-in-a-subfolder case.
2023-03-15 16:51:39 -05:00
Lunny Xiao
27494ed20d
Fix missed migration in #22235 (#23482)
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2023-03-15 10:33:10 +01:00
KN4CK3R
2173f14708
Add user webhooks (#21563)
Currently we can add webhooks for organizations but not for users. This
PR adds the latter. You can access it from the current users settings.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/197391408-15dfdc23-b476-4d0c-82f7-9bc9b065988f.png)
2023-03-10 08:28:32 -06:00
Nick
52e24167e5
Test renderReadmeFile (#23185)
Add test coverage to the important features of
[`routers.web.repo.renderReadmeFile`](067b0c2664/routers/web/repo/view.go (L273));
namely that:

- it can handle looking in docs/, .gitea/, and .github/
- it can handle choosing between multiple competing READMEs
- it prefers the localized README to the markdown README to the
plaintext README
- it can handle broken symlinks when processing all the options
- it uses the name of the symlink, not the name of the target of the
symlink
2023-03-09 09:24:23 +08:00
yp05327
6864583957
Add default owner team to privated_org and limited_org in unit test (#23109)
Related to https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22705 's CI result
[here](https://drone.gitea.io/go-gitea/gitea/68043/2/16)
> IsOrganizationOwner() [E] [63f61849-7] Organization does not have
owner team: 23
2023-03-04 19:23:51 +00:00
yp05327
699f20234b
Use correct README link to render the README (#23152)
`renderReadmeFile` needs `readmeTreelink` as parameter but gets
`treeLink`.
The values of them look like as following:
`treeLink`:  `/{OwnerName}/{RepoName}/src/branch/{BranchName}`
`readmeTreelink`:
`/{OwnerName}/{RepoName}/src/branch/{BranchName}/{ReadmeFileName}`

`path.Dir` in

8540fc45b1/routers/web/repo/view.go (L316)
should convert `readmeTreelink` into
`/{OwnerName}/{RepoName}/src/branch/{BranchName}` instead of the current
`/{OwnerName}/{RepoName}/src/branch`.

Fixes #23151

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-03-03 18:01:33 +08:00
zeripath
ef11d41639
Make CI use a dummy password hasher for all tests (#22983)
During the recent hash algorithm change it became clear that the choice
of password hash algorithm plays a role in the time taken for CI to run.

Therefore as attempt to improve CI we should consider using a dummy
hashing algorithm instead of a real hashing algorithm.

This PR creates a dummy algorithm which is then set as the default
hashing algorithm during tests that use the fixtures. This hopefully
will cause a reduction in the time it takes for CI to run.

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-20 13:20:30 +08:00
Kyle D
2b3f12f6fd
Use beforeCommit instead of baseCommit (#22949)
Replaces: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22947
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22946
Probably related to https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/19530

Basically, many of the diffs were broken because they were comparing to
the base commit, where a 3-dot diff should be comparing to the [last
common
ancestor](https://matthew-brett.github.io/pydagogue/git_diff_dots.html).

This should have an integration test so that we don’t run into this
issue again.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jonnytran@gmail.com>
2023-02-20 11:56:07 +08:00
zeripath
61b89747ed
Provide the ability to set password hash algorithm parameters (#22942)
This PR refactors and improves the password hashing code within gitea
and makes it possible for server administrators to set the password
hashing parameters

In addition it takes the opportunity to adjust the settings for `pbkdf2`
in order to make the hashing a little stronger.

The majority of this work was inspired by PR #14751 and I would like to
thank @boppy for their work on this.

Thanks to @gusted for the suggestion to adjust the `pbkdf2` hashing
parameters.

Close #14751

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-19 15:35:20 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel
6221a6fd54
Scoped labels (#22585)
Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the
label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/`
prefix can be set on an issue.

The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example
`scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in
different scopes and can coexist.

Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they
are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically
removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a
new label or replacing all labels.

In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as
radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a
single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be
used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and
batch editing.

Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification:

* Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips
everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus.
* In label list, show description below label same as label menus.
* Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer.
* Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance
in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is
closer to perceptually linear.
* Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing
only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling.
* Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function.

Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu:

* Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing.
* Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate
lines.
* Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu.
* Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and
consistent with settings layout elsewhere.

Custom exclusive scoped label rendering:

* Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and
lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them
similar to the `/` symbol.
* In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line.

---------

Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-18 21:17:39 +02:00
Jason Song
82728a7cec
Do not overwrite empty DefaultBranch (#22708)
Fix #21994. 
And fix #19470.

While generating new repo from a template, it does something like
"commit to git repo, re-fetch repo model from DB, and update default
branch if it's empty".


19d5b2f922/modules/repository/generate.go (L241-L253)

Unfortunately, when load repo from DB, the default branch will be set to
`setting.Repository.DefaultBranch` if it's empty:


19d5b2f922/models/repo/repo.go (L228-L233)

I believe it's a very old temporary patch but has been kept for many
years, see:
[2d2d85bb](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/commit/2d2d85bb#diff-1851799b06733db4df3ec74385c1e8850ee5aedee70b8b55366910d22725eea8)

I know it's a risk to delete it, may lead to potential behavioral
changes, but we cannot keep the outdated `FIXME` forever. On the other
hand, an empty `DefaultBranch` does make sense: an empty repo doesn't
have one conceptually (actually, Gitea will still set it to
`setting.Repository.DefaultBranch` to make it safer).
2023-02-02 14:48:48 -06:00
Gusted
1b53a9e914
Don't return duplicated users who can create org repo (#22560)
- Currently the function `GetUsersWhoCanCreateOrgRepo` uses a query that
is able to have duplicated users in the result, this is can happen under
the condition that a user is in team that either is the owner team or
has permission to create organization repositories.
- Add test code to simulate the above condition for user 3,
[`TestGetUsersWhoCanCreateOrgRepo`](a1fcb1cfb8/models/organization/org_test.go (L435))
is the test function that tests for this.
- The fix is quite trivial use a map keyed by user id in order to drop
duplicates.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-30 18:12:45 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
6fe3c8b398
Support org/user level projects (#22235)
Fix #13405

<img width="1151" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/209442911-7baa3924-c389-47b6-b63b-a740803e640e.png">

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2023-01-20 19:42:33 +08:00