Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nanguan Lin d95102d650
Fix wrong xorm Delete usage (#27995)
## Bug in Gitea
I ran into this bug when I accidentally used the wrong redirect URL for
the oauth2 provider when using mssql. But the oauth2 provider still got
added.
Most of the time, we use `Delete(&some{id: some.id})` or
`In(condition).Delete(&some{})`, which specify the conditions. But the
function uses `Delete(source)` when `source.Cfg` is a `TEXT` field and
not empty. This will cause xorm `Delete` function not working in mssql.

61ff91f960/models/auth/source.go (L234-L240)

## Reason
Because the `TEXT` field can not be compared in mssql, xorm doesn't
support it according to [this
PR](https://gitea.com/xorm/xorm/pulls/2062)
[related
code](b23798dc98/internal/statements/statement.go (L552-L558))
in xorm
```go
if statement.dialect.URI().DBType == schemas.MSSQL && (col.SQLType.Name == schemas.Text ||
   col.SQLType.IsBlob() || col.SQLType.Name == schemas.TimeStampz) {
   if utils.IsValueZero(fieldValue) {
     continue
   }
   return nil, fmt.Errorf("column %s is a TEXT type with data %#v which cannot be as compare condition", col.Name, fieldValue.Interface())
   }
}
```
When using the `Delete` function in xorm, the non-empty fields will
auto-set as conditions(perhaps some special fields are not?). If `TEXT`
field is not empty, xorm will return an error. I only found this usage
after searching, but maybe there is something I missing.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-11-12 07:38:45 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 1bf5527eac
Refactor Find Sources and fix bug when view a user who belongs to an unactive auth source (#27798)
The steps to reproduce it.

First, create a new oauth2 source.
Then, a user login with this oauth2 source.
Disable the oauth2 source.
Visit users -> settings -> security, 500 will be displayed.
This is because this page only load active Oauth2 sources but not all
Oauth2 sources.
2023-11-03 01:41:00 +00:00
JakobDev ebe803e514
Penultimate round of `db.DefaultContext` refactor (#27414)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-10-11 04:24:07 +00:00
yp05327 6e58f8400e
Fix 500 error if there is a name conflict when edit authentication source (#23832) 2023-03-31 22:32:18 +08:00
flynnnnnnnnnn e81ccc406b
Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840)
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.

Fix #16132

Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-27 18:20:29 +00:00
zeripath 716fcfcf72
Make every not exist error unwrappable to a fs.ErrNotExist (#20891)
A lot of our code is repeatedly testing if individual errors are
specific types of Not Exist errors. This is repetitative and unnecesary.
`Unwrap() error` provides a common way of labelling an error as a
NotExist error and we can/should use this.

This PR has chosen to use the common `io/fs` errors e.g.
`fs.ErrNotExist` for our errors. This is in some ways not completely
correct as these are not filesystem errors but it seems like a
reasonable thing to do and would allow us to simplify a lot of our code
to `errors.Is(err, fs.ErrNotExist)` instead of
`package.IsErr...NotExist(err)`

I am open to suggestions to use a different base error - perhaps
`models/db.ErrNotExist` if that would be felt to be better.


Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-10-18 07:50:37 +02:00
Lunny Xiao de8e3948a5
Refactor auth package (#17962) 2022-01-02 21:12:35 +08:00