postgresql/src/backend/utils/cache/relmapper.c

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

1131 lines
33 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* relmapper.c
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
* Catalog-to-filenumber mapping
*
* For most tables, the physical file underlying the table is specified by
* pg_class.relfilenode. However, that obviously won't work for pg_class
* itself, nor for the other "nailed" catalogs for which we have to be able
* to set up working Relation entries without access to pg_class. It also
* does not work for shared catalogs, since there is no practical way to
* update other databases' pg_class entries when relocating a shared catalog.
* Therefore, for these special catalogs (henceforth referred to as "mapped
* catalogs") we rely on a separately maintained file that shows the mapping
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
* from catalog OIDs to filenumbers. Each database has a map file for
* its local mapped catalogs, and there is a separate map file for shared
* catalogs. Mapped catalogs have zero in their pg_class.relfilenode entries.
*
* Relocation of a normal table is committed (ie, the new physical file becomes
* authoritative) when the pg_class row update commits. For mapped catalogs,
* the act of updating the map file is effectively commit of the relocation.
* We postpone the file update till just before commit of the transaction
* doing the rewrite, but there is necessarily a window between. Therefore
* mapped catalogs can only be relocated by operations such as VACUUM FULL
* and CLUSTER, which make no transactionally-significant changes: it must be
* safe for the new file to replace the old, even if the transaction itself
* aborts. An important factor here is that the indexes and toast table of
* a mapped catalog must also be mapped, so that the rewrites/relocations of
* all these files commit in a single map file update rather than being tied
* to transaction commit.
*
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2023, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
2010-09-20 22:08:53 +02:00
* src/backend/utils/cache/relmapper.c
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#include "postgres.h"
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include "access/xact.h"
#include "access/xlog.h"
#include "access/xloginsert.h"
#include "catalog/catalog.h"
#include "catalog/pg_tablespace.h"
#include "catalog/storage.h"
#include "miscadmin.h"
#include "pgstat.h"
#include "storage/fd.h"
#include "storage/lwlock.h"
#include "utils/inval.h"
#include "utils/relmapper.h"
/*
* The map file is critical data: we have no automatic method for recovering
* from loss or corruption of it. We use a CRC so that we can detect
* corruption. Since the file might be more than one standard-size disk
* sector in size, we cannot rely on overwrite-in-place. Instead, we generate
* a new file and rename it into place, atomically replacing the original file.
*
* Entries in the mappings[] array are in no particular order. We could
* speed searching by insisting on OID order, but it really shouldn't be
* worth the trouble given the intended size of the mapping sets.
*/
#define RELMAPPER_FILENAME "pg_filenode.map"
#define RELMAPPER_TEMP_FILENAME "pg_filenode.map.tmp"
#define RELMAPPER_FILEMAGIC 0x592717 /* version ID value */
/*
* There's no need for this constant to have any particular value, and we
* can raise it as necessary if we end up with more mapped relations. For
* now, we just pick a round number that is modestly larger than the expected
* number of mappings.
*/
#define MAX_MAPPINGS 64
typedef struct RelMapping
{
Oid mapoid; /* OID of a catalog */
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
RelFileNumber mapfilenumber; /* its rel file number */
} RelMapping;
typedef struct RelMapFile
{
int32 magic; /* always RELMAPPER_FILEMAGIC */
int32 num_mappings; /* number of valid RelMapping entries */
RelMapping mappings[MAX_MAPPINGS];
pg_crc32c crc; /* CRC of all above */
} RelMapFile;
/*
* State for serializing local and shared relmappings for parallel workers
* (active states only). See notes on active_* and pending_* updates state.
*/
typedef struct SerializedActiveRelMaps
{
RelMapFile active_shared_updates;
RelMapFile active_local_updates;
} SerializedActiveRelMaps;
/*
* The currently known contents of the shared map file and our database's
* local map file are stored here. These can be reloaded from disk
* immediately whenever we receive an update sinval message.
*/
static RelMapFile shared_map;
static RelMapFile local_map;
/*
* We use the same RelMapFile data structure to track uncommitted local
* changes in the mappings (but note the magic and crc fields are not made
* valid in these variables). Currently, map updates are not allowed within
* subtransactions, so one set of transaction-level changes is sufficient.
*
* The active_xxx variables contain updates that are valid in our transaction
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
* and should be honored by RelationMapOidToFilenumber. The pending_xxx
* variables contain updates we have been told about that aren't active yet;
* they will become active at the next CommandCounterIncrement. This setup
* lets map updates act similarly to updates of pg_class rows, ie, they
* become visible only at the next CommandCounterIncrement boundary.
*
* Active shared and active local updates are serialized by the parallel
* infrastructure, and deserialized within parallel workers.
*/
static RelMapFile active_shared_updates;
static RelMapFile active_local_updates;
static RelMapFile pending_shared_updates;
static RelMapFile pending_local_updates;
/* non-export function prototypes */
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
static void apply_map_update(RelMapFile *map, Oid relationId,
RelFileNumber fileNumber, bool add_okay);
static void merge_map_updates(RelMapFile *map, const RelMapFile *updates,
bool add_okay);
static void load_relmap_file(bool shared, bool lock_held);
static void read_relmap_file(RelMapFile *map, char *dbpath, bool lock_held,
int elevel);
static void write_relmap_file(RelMapFile *newmap, bool write_wal,
bool send_sinval, bool preserve_files,
Oid dbid, Oid tsid, const char *dbpath);
static void perform_relmap_update(bool shared, const RelMapFile *updates);
/*
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
* RelationMapOidToFilenumber
*
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
* The raison d' etre ... given a relation OID, look up its filenumber.
*
* Although shared and local relation OIDs should never overlap, the caller
* always knows which we need --- so pass that information to avoid useless
* searching.
*
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
* Returns InvalidRelFileNumber if the OID is not known (which should never
* happen, but the caller is in a better position to report a meaningful
* error).
*/
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
RelFileNumber
RelationMapOidToFilenumber(Oid relationId, bool shared)
{
const RelMapFile *map;
int32 i;
/* If there are active updates, believe those over the main maps */
if (shared)
{
map = &active_shared_updates;
for (i = 0; i < map->num_mappings; i++)
{
if (relationId == map->mappings[i].mapoid)
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
return map->mappings[i].mapfilenumber;
}
map = &shared_map;
for (i = 0; i < map->num_mappings; i++)
{
if (relationId == map->mappings[i].mapoid)
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
return map->mappings[i].mapfilenumber;
}
}
else
{
map = &active_local_updates;
for (i = 0; i < map->num_mappings; i++)
{
if (relationId == map->mappings[i].mapoid)
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
return map->mappings[i].mapfilenumber;
}
map = &local_map;
for (i = 0; i < map->num_mappings; i++)
{
if (relationId == map->mappings[i].mapoid)
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
return map->mappings[i].mapfilenumber;
}
}
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
return InvalidRelFileNumber;
}
/*
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
* RelationMapFilenumberToOid
*
* Do the reverse of the normal direction of mapping done in
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
* RelationMapOidToFilenumber.
*
* This is not supposed to be used during normal running but rather for
* information purposes when looking at the filesystem or xlog.
*
* Returns InvalidOid if the OID is not known; this can easily happen if the
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
* relfilenumber doesn't pertain to a mapped relation.
*/
Oid
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
RelationMapFilenumberToOid(RelFileNumber filenumber, bool shared)
{
const RelMapFile *map;
int32 i;
/* If there are active updates, believe those over the main maps */
if (shared)
{
map = &active_shared_updates;
for (i = 0; i < map->num_mappings; i++)
{
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
if (filenumber == map->mappings[i].mapfilenumber)
return map->mappings[i].mapoid;
}
map = &shared_map;
for (i = 0; i < map->num_mappings; i++)
{
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
if (filenumber == map->mappings[i].mapfilenumber)
return map->mappings[i].mapoid;
}
}
else
{
map = &active_local_updates;
for (i = 0; i < map->num_mappings; i++)
{
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
if (filenumber == map->mappings[i].mapfilenumber)
return map->mappings[i].mapoid;
}
map = &local_map;
for (i = 0; i < map->num_mappings; i++)
{
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
if (filenumber == map->mappings[i].mapfilenumber)
return map->mappings[i].mapoid;
}
}
return InvalidOid;
}
Add new block-by-block strategy for CREATE DATABASE. Because this strategy logs changes on a block-by-block basis, it avoids the need to checkpoint before and after the operation. However, because it logs each changed block individually, it might generate a lot of extra write-ahead logging if the template database is large. Therefore, the older strategy remains available via a new STRATEGY parameter to CREATE DATABASE, and a corresponding --strategy option to createdb. Somewhat controversially, this patch assembles the list of relations to be copied to the new database by reading the pg_class relation of the template database. Cross-database access like this isn't normally possible, but it can be made to work here because there can't be any connections to the database being copied, nor can it contain any in-doubt transactions. Even so, we have to use lower-level interfaces than normal, since the table scan and relcache interfaces will not work for a database to which we're not connected. The advantage of this approach is that we do not need to rely on the filesystem to determine what ought to be copied, but instead on PostgreSQL's own knowledge of the database structure. This avoids, for example, copying stray files that happen to be located in the source database directory. Dilip Kumar, with a fairly large number of cosmetic changes by me. Reviewed and tested by Ashutosh Sharma, Andres Freund, John Naylor, Greg Nancarrow, Neha Sharma. Additional feedback from Bruce Momjian, Heikki Linnakangas, Julien Rouhaud, Adam Brusselback, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Tomas Vondra, Andrew Dunstan, Álvaro Herrera, and others. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYtcdxBjLh31DLxUXHxFVMPGzrU5_T=CYCvRyFHywSBUQ@mail.gmail.com
2022-03-29 17:31:43 +02:00
/*
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
* RelationMapOidToFilenumberForDatabase
Add new block-by-block strategy for CREATE DATABASE. Because this strategy logs changes on a block-by-block basis, it avoids the need to checkpoint before and after the operation. However, because it logs each changed block individually, it might generate a lot of extra write-ahead logging if the template database is large. Therefore, the older strategy remains available via a new STRATEGY parameter to CREATE DATABASE, and a corresponding --strategy option to createdb. Somewhat controversially, this patch assembles the list of relations to be copied to the new database by reading the pg_class relation of the template database. Cross-database access like this isn't normally possible, but it can be made to work here because there can't be any connections to the database being copied, nor can it contain any in-doubt transactions. Even so, we have to use lower-level interfaces than normal, since the table scan and relcache interfaces will not work for a database to which we're not connected. The advantage of this approach is that we do not need to rely on the filesystem to determine what ought to be copied, but instead on PostgreSQL's own knowledge of the database structure. This avoids, for example, copying stray files that happen to be located in the source database directory. Dilip Kumar, with a fairly large number of cosmetic changes by me. Reviewed and tested by Ashutosh Sharma, Andres Freund, John Naylor, Greg Nancarrow, Neha Sharma. Additional feedback from Bruce Momjian, Heikki Linnakangas, Julien Rouhaud, Adam Brusselback, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Tomas Vondra, Andrew Dunstan, Álvaro Herrera, and others. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYtcdxBjLh31DLxUXHxFVMPGzrU5_T=CYCvRyFHywSBUQ@mail.gmail.com
2022-03-29 17:31:43 +02:00
*
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
* Like RelationMapOidToFilenumber, but reads the mapping from the indicated
Add new block-by-block strategy for CREATE DATABASE. Because this strategy logs changes on a block-by-block basis, it avoids the need to checkpoint before and after the operation. However, because it logs each changed block individually, it might generate a lot of extra write-ahead logging if the template database is large. Therefore, the older strategy remains available via a new STRATEGY parameter to CREATE DATABASE, and a corresponding --strategy option to createdb. Somewhat controversially, this patch assembles the list of relations to be copied to the new database by reading the pg_class relation of the template database. Cross-database access like this isn't normally possible, but it can be made to work here because there can't be any connections to the database being copied, nor can it contain any in-doubt transactions. Even so, we have to use lower-level interfaces than normal, since the table scan and relcache interfaces will not work for a database to which we're not connected. The advantage of this approach is that we do not need to rely on the filesystem to determine what ought to be copied, but instead on PostgreSQL's own knowledge of the database structure. This avoids, for example, copying stray files that happen to be located in the source database directory. Dilip Kumar, with a fairly large number of cosmetic changes by me. Reviewed and tested by Ashutosh Sharma, Andres Freund, John Naylor, Greg Nancarrow, Neha Sharma. Additional feedback from Bruce Momjian, Heikki Linnakangas, Julien Rouhaud, Adam Brusselback, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Tomas Vondra, Andrew Dunstan, Álvaro Herrera, and others. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYtcdxBjLh31DLxUXHxFVMPGzrU5_T=CYCvRyFHywSBUQ@mail.gmail.com
2022-03-29 17:31:43 +02:00
* path instead of using the one for the current database.
*/
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
RelFileNumber
RelationMapOidToFilenumberForDatabase(char *dbpath, Oid relationId)
Add new block-by-block strategy for CREATE DATABASE. Because this strategy logs changes on a block-by-block basis, it avoids the need to checkpoint before and after the operation. However, because it logs each changed block individually, it might generate a lot of extra write-ahead logging if the template database is large. Therefore, the older strategy remains available via a new STRATEGY parameter to CREATE DATABASE, and a corresponding --strategy option to createdb. Somewhat controversially, this patch assembles the list of relations to be copied to the new database by reading the pg_class relation of the template database. Cross-database access like this isn't normally possible, but it can be made to work here because there can't be any connections to the database being copied, nor can it contain any in-doubt transactions. Even so, we have to use lower-level interfaces than normal, since the table scan and relcache interfaces will not work for a database to which we're not connected. The advantage of this approach is that we do not need to rely on the filesystem to determine what ought to be copied, but instead on PostgreSQL's own knowledge of the database structure. This avoids, for example, copying stray files that happen to be located in the source database directory. Dilip Kumar, with a fairly large number of cosmetic changes by me. Reviewed and tested by Ashutosh Sharma, Andres Freund, John Naylor, Greg Nancarrow, Neha Sharma. Additional feedback from Bruce Momjian, Heikki Linnakangas, Julien Rouhaud, Adam Brusselback, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Tomas Vondra, Andrew Dunstan, Álvaro Herrera, and others. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYtcdxBjLh31DLxUXHxFVMPGzrU5_T=CYCvRyFHywSBUQ@mail.gmail.com
2022-03-29 17:31:43 +02:00
{
RelMapFile map;
int i;
/* Read the relmap file from the source database. */
read_relmap_file(&map, dbpath, false, ERROR);
/* Iterate over the relmap entries to find the input relation OID. */
for (i = 0; i < map.num_mappings; i++)
{
if (relationId == map.mappings[i].mapoid)
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
return map.mappings[i].mapfilenumber;
Add new block-by-block strategy for CREATE DATABASE. Because this strategy logs changes on a block-by-block basis, it avoids the need to checkpoint before and after the operation. However, because it logs each changed block individually, it might generate a lot of extra write-ahead logging if the template database is large. Therefore, the older strategy remains available via a new STRATEGY parameter to CREATE DATABASE, and a corresponding --strategy option to createdb. Somewhat controversially, this patch assembles the list of relations to be copied to the new database by reading the pg_class relation of the template database. Cross-database access like this isn't normally possible, but it can be made to work here because there can't be any connections to the database being copied, nor can it contain any in-doubt transactions. Even so, we have to use lower-level interfaces than normal, since the table scan and relcache interfaces will not work for a database to which we're not connected. The advantage of this approach is that we do not need to rely on the filesystem to determine what ought to be copied, but instead on PostgreSQL's own knowledge of the database structure. This avoids, for example, copying stray files that happen to be located in the source database directory. Dilip Kumar, with a fairly large number of cosmetic changes by me. Reviewed and tested by Ashutosh Sharma, Andres Freund, John Naylor, Greg Nancarrow, Neha Sharma. Additional feedback from Bruce Momjian, Heikki Linnakangas, Julien Rouhaud, Adam Brusselback, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Tomas Vondra, Andrew Dunstan, Álvaro Herrera, and others. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYtcdxBjLh31DLxUXHxFVMPGzrU5_T=CYCvRyFHywSBUQ@mail.gmail.com
2022-03-29 17:31:43 +02:00
}
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
return InvalidRelFileNumber;
Add new block-by-block strategy for CREATE DATABASE. Because this strategy logs changes on a block-by-block basis, it avoids the need to checkpoint before and after the operation. However, because it logs each changed block individually, it might generate a lot of extra write-ahead logging if the template database is large. Therefore, the older strategy remains available via a new STRATEGY parameter to CREATE DATABASE, and a corresponding --strategy option to createdb. Somewhat controversially, this patch assembles the list of relations to be copied to the new database by reading the pg_class relation of the template database. Cross-database access like this isn't normally possible, but it can be made to work here because there can't be any connections to the database being copied, nor can it contain any in-doubt transactions. Even so, we have to use lower-level interfaces than normal, since the table scan and relcache interfaces will not work for a database to which we're not connected. The advantage of this approach is that we do not need to rely on the filesystem to determine what ought to be copied, but instead on PostgreSQL's own knowledge of the database structure. This avoids, for example, copying stray files that happen to be located in the source database directory. Dilip Kumar, with a fairly large number of cosmetic changes by me. Reviewed and tested by Ashutosh Sharma, Andres Freund, John Naylor, Greg Nancarrow, Neha Sharma. Additional feedback from Bruce Momjian, Heikki Linnakangas, Julien Rouhaud, Adam Brusselback, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Tomas Vondra, Andrew Dunstan, Álvaro Herrera, and others. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYtcdxBjLh31DLxUXHxFVMPGzrU5_T=CYCvRyFHywSBUQ@mail.gmail.com
2022-03-29 17:31:43 +02:00
}
/*
* RelationMapCopy
*
* Copy relmapfile from source db path to the destination db path and WAL log
* the operation. This is intended for use in creating a new relmap file
* for a database that doesn't have one yet, not for replacing an existing
* relmap file.
*/
void
RelationMapCopy(Oid dbid, Oid tsid, char *srcdbpath, char *dstdbpath)
{
RelMapFile map;
/*
* Read the relmap file from the source database.
*/
read_relmap_file(&map, srcdbpath, false, ERROR);
/*
* Write the same data into the destination database's relmap file.
*
* No sinval is needed because no one can be connected to the destination
* database yet. For the same reason, there is no need to acquire
* RelationMappingLock.
*
* There's no point in trying to preserve files here. The new database
* isn't usable yet anyway, and won't ever be if we can't install a relmap
* file.
*/
write_relmap_file(&map, true, false, false, dbid, tsid, dstdbpath);
}
/*
* RelationMapUpdateMap
*
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
* Install a new relfilenumber mapping for the specified relation.
*
* If immediate is true (or we're bootstrapping), the mapping is activated
* immediately. Otherwise it is made pending until CommandCounterIncrement.
*/
void
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
RelationMapUpdateMap(Oid relationId, RelFileNumber fileNumber, bool shared,
bool immediate)
{
RelMapFile *map;
if (IsBootstrapProcessingMode())
{
/*
* In bootstrap mode, the mapping gets installed in permanent map.
*/
if (shared)
map = &shared_map;
else
map = &local_map;
}
else
{
/*
* We don't currently support map changes within subtransactions, or
* when in parallel mode. This could be done with more bookkeeping
* infrastructure, but it doesn't presently seem worth it.
*/
if (GetCurrentTransactionNestLevel() > 1)
elog(ERROR, "cannot change relation mapping within subtransaction");
if (IsInParallelMode())
elog(ERROR, "cannot change relation mapping in parallel mode");
if (immediate)
{
/* Make it active, but only locally */
if (shared)
map = &active_shared_updates;
else
map = &active_local_updates;
}
else
{
/* Make it pending */
if (shared)
map = &pending_shared_updates;
else
map = &pending_local_updates;
}
}
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
apply_map_update(map, relationId, fileNumber, true);
}
/*
* apply_map_update
*
* Insert a new mapping into the given map variable, replacing any existing
* mapping for the same relation.
*
* In some cases the caller knows there must be an existing mapping; pass
* add_okay = false to draw an error if not.
*/
static void
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
apply_map_update(RelMapFile *map, Oid relationId, RelFileNumber fileNumber,
bool add_okay)
{
int32 i;
/* Replace any existing mapping */
for (i = 0; i < map->num_mappings; i++)
{
if (relationId == map->mappings[i].mapoid)
{
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
map->mappings[i].mapfilenumber = fileNumber;
return;
}
}
/* Nope, need to add a new mapping */
if (!add_okay)
elog(ERROR, "attempt to apply a mapping to unmapped relation %u",
relationId);
if (map->num_mappings >= MAX_MAPPINGS)
elog(ERROR, "ran out of space in relation map");
map->mappings[map->num_mappings].mapoid = relationId;
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
map->mappings[map->num_mappings].mapfilenumber = fileNumber;
map->num_mappings++;
}
/*
* merge_map_updates
*
* Merge all the updates in the given pending-update map into the target map.
* This is just a bulk form of apply_map_update.
*/
static void
merge_map_updates(RelMapFile *map, const RelMapFile *updates, bool add_okay)
{
int32 i;
for (i = 0; i < updates->num_mappings; i++)
{
apply_map_update(map,
updates->mappings[i].mapoid,
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
updates->mappings[i].mapfilenumber,
add_okay);
}
}
/*
* RelationMapRemoveMapping
*
* Remove a relation's entry in the map. This is only allowed for "active"
* (but not committed) local mappings. We need it so we can back out the
* entry for the transient target file when doing VACUUM FULL/CLUSTER on
* a mapped relation.
*/
void
RelationMapRemoveMapping(Oid relationId)
{
RelMapFile *map = &active_local_updates;
int32 i;
for (i = 0; i < map->num_mappings; i++)
{
if (relationId == map->mappings[i].mapoid)
{
/* Found it, collapse it out */
map->mappings[i] = map->mappings[map->num_mappings - 1];
map->num_mappings--;
return;
}
}
elog(ERROR, "could not find temporary mapping for relation %u",
relationId);
}
/*
* RelationMapInvalidate
*
* This routine is invoked for SI cache flush messages. We must re-read
* the indicated map file. However, we might receive a SI message in a
* process that hasn't yet, and might never, load the mapping files;
* for example the autovacuum launcher, which *must not* try to read
* a local map since it is attached to no particular database.
* So, re-read only if the map is valid now.
*/
void
RelationMapInvalidate(bool shared)
{
if (shared)
{
if (shared_map.magic == RELMAPPER_FILEMAGIC)
load_relmap_file(true, false);
}
else
{
if (local_map.magic == RELMAPPER_FILEMAGIC)
load_relmap_file(false, false);
}
}
/*
* RelationMapInvalidateAll
*
* Reload all map files. This is used to recover from SI message buffer
* overflow: we can't be sure if we missed an inval message.
* Again, reload only currently-valid maps.
*/
void
RelationMapInvalidateAll(void)
{
if (shared_map.magic == RELMAPPER_FILEMAGIC)
load_relmap_file(true, false);
if (local_map.magic == RELMAPPER_FILEMAGIC)
load_relmap_file(false, false);
}
/*
* AtCCI_RelationMap
*
* Activate any "pending" relation map updates at CommandCounterIncrement time.
*/
void
AtCCI_RelationMap(void)
{
if (pending_shared_updates.num_mappings != 0)
{
merge_map_updates(&active_shared_updates,
&pending_shared_updates,
true);
pending_shared_updates.num_mappings = 0;
}
if (pending_local_updates.num_mappings != 0)
{
merge_map_updates(&active_local_updates,
&pending_local_updates,
true);
pending_local_updates.num_mappings = 0;
}
}
/*
* AtEOXact_RelationMap
*
* Handle relation mapping at main-transaction commit or abort.
*
* During commit, this must be called as late as possible before the actual
* transaction commit, so as to minimize the window where the transaction
* could still roll back after committing map changes. Although nothing
* critically bad happens in such a case, we still would prefer that it
* not happen, since we'd possibly be losing useful updates to the relations'
* pg_class row(s).
*
* During abort, we just have to throw away any pending map changes.
* Normal post-abort cleanup will take care of fixing relcache entries.
* Parallel worker commit/abort is handled by resetting active mappings
* that may have been received from the leader process. (There should be
* no pending updates in parallel workers.)
*/
void
AtEOXact_RelationMap(bool isCommit, bool isParallelWorker)
{
if (isCommit && !isParallelWorker)
{
/*
* We should not get here with any "pending" updates. (We could
* logically choose to treat such as committed, but in the current
* code this should never happen.)
*/
Assert(pending_shared_updates.num_mappings == 0);
Assert(pending_local_updates.num_mappings == 0);
/*
* Write any active updates to the actual map files, then reset them.
*/
if (active_shared_updates.num_mappings != 0)
{
perform_relmap_update(true, &active_shared_updates);
active_shared_updates.num_mappings = 0;
}
if (active_local_updates.num_mappings != 0)
{
perform_relmap_update(false, &active_local_updates);
active_local_updates.num_mappings = 0;
}
}
else
{
/* Abort or parallel worker --- drop all local and pending updates */
Assert(!isParallelWorker || pending_shared_updates.num_mappings == 0);
Assert(!isParallelWorker || pending_local_updates.num_mappings == 0);
active_shared_updates.num_mappings = 0;
active_local_updates.num_mappings = 0;
pending_shared_updates.num_mappings = 0;
pending_local_updates.num_mappings = 0;
}
}
/*
* AtPrepare_RelationMap
*
* Handle relation mapping at PREPARE.
*
* Currently, we don't support preparing any transaction that changes the map.
*/
void
AtPrepare_RelationMap(void)
{
if (active_shared_updates.num_mappings != 0 ||
active_local_updates.num_mappings != 0 ||
pending_shared_updates.num_mappings != 0 ||
pending_local_updates.num_mappings != 0)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("cannot PREPARE a transaction that modified relation mapping")));
}
/*
* CheckPointRelationMap
*
* This is called during a checkpoint. It must ensure that any relation map
* updates that were WAL-logged before the start of the checkpoint are
* securely flushed to disk and will not need to be replayed later. This
* seems unlikely to be a performance-critical issue, so we use a simple
* method: we just take and release the RelationMappingLock. This ensures
* that any already-logged map update is complete, because write_relmap_file
* will fsync the map file before the lock is released.
*/
void
CheckPointRelationMap(void)
{
LWLockAcquire(RelationMappingLock, LW_SHARED);
LWLockRelease(RelationMappingLock);
}
/*
* RelationMapFinishBootstrap
*
* Write out the initial relation mapping files at the completion of
* bootstrap. All the mapped files should have been made known to us
* via RelationMapUpdateMap calls.
*/
void
RelationMapFinishBootstrap(void)
{
Assert(IsBootstrapProcessingMode());
/* Shouldn't be anything "pending" ... */
Assert(active_shared_updates.num_mappings == 0);
Assert(active_local_updates.num_mappings == 0);
Assert(pending_shared_updates.num_mappings == 0);
Assert(pending_local_updates.num_mappings == 0);
/* Write the files; no WAL or sinval needed */
write_relmap_file(&shared_map, false, false, false,
InvalidOid, GLOBALTABLESPACE_OID, "global");
write_relmap_file(&local_map, false, false, false,
MyDatabaseId, MyDatabaseTableSpace, DatabasePath);
}
/*
* RelationMapInitialize
*
* This initializes the mapper module at process startup. We can't access the
* database yet, so just make sure the maps are empty.
*/
void
RelationMapInitialize(void)
{
/* The static variables should initialize to zeroes, but let's be sure */
shared_map.magic = 0; /* mark it not loaded */
local_map.magic = 0;
shared_map.num_mappings = 0;
local_map.num_mappings = 0;
active_shared_updates.num_mappings = 0;
active_local_updates.num_mappings = 0;
pending_shared_updates.num_mappings = 0;
pending_local_updates.num_mappings = 0;
}
/*
* RelationMapInitializePhase2
*
* This is called to prepare for access to pg_database during startup.
* We should be able to read the shared map file now.
*/
void
RelationMapInitializePhase2(void)
{
/*
* In bootstrap mode, the map file isn't there yet, so do nothing.
*/
if (IsBootstrapProcessingMode())
return;
/*
* Load the shared map file, die on error.
*/
load_relmap_file(true, false);
}
/*
* RelationMapInitializePhase3
*
* This is called as soon as we have determined MyDatabaseId and set up
* DatabasePath. At this point we should be able to read the local map file.
*/
void
RelationMapInitializePhase3(void)
{
/*
* In bootstrap mode, the map file isn't there yet, so do nothing.
*/
if (IsBootstrapProcessingMode())
return;
/*
* Load the local map file, die on error.
*/
load_relmap_file(false, false);
}
/*
* EstimateRelationMapSpace
*
* Estimate space needed to pass active shared and local relmaps to parallel
* workers.
*/
Size
EstimateRelationMapSpace(void)
{
return sizeof(SerializedActiveRelMaps);
}
/*
* SerializeRelationMap
*
* Serialize active shared and local relmap state for parallel workers.
*/
void
SerializeRelationMap(Size maxSize, char *startAddress)
{
SerializedActiveRelMaps *relmaps;
Assert(maxSize >= EstimateRelationMapSpace());
relmaps = (SerializedActiveRelMaps *) startAddress;
relmaps->active_shared_updates = active_shared_updates;
relmaps->active_local_updates = active_local_updates;
}
/*
* RestoreRelationMap
*
* Restore active shared and local relmap state within a parallel worker.
*/
void
RestoreRelationMap(char *startAddress)
{
SerializedActiveRelMaps *relmaps;
if (active_shared_updates.num_mappings != 0 ||
active_local_updates.num_mappings != 0 ||
pending_shared_updates.num_mappings != 0 ||
pending_local_updates.num_mappings != 0)
elog(ERROR, "parallel worker has existing mappings");
relmaps = (SerializedActiveRelMaps *) startAddress;
active_shared_updates = relmaps->active_shared_updates;
active_local_updates = relmaps->active_local_updates;
}
/*
* load_relmap_file -- load the shared or local map file
*
* Because these files are essential for access to core system catalogs,
* failure to load either of them is a fatal error.
*
* Note that the local case requires DatabasePath to be set up.
*/
static void
load_relmap_file(bool shared, bool lock_held)
{
if (shared)
read_relmap_file(&shared_map, "global", lock_held, FATAL);
else
read_relmap_file(&local_map, DatabasePath, lock_held, FATAL);
}
/*
* read_relmap_file -- load data from any relation mapper file
*
* dbpath must be the relevant database path, or "global" for shared relations.
*
* RelationMappingLock will be acquired released unless lock_held = true.
*
* Errors will be reported at the indicated elevel, which should be at least
* ERROR.
*/
static void
read_relmap_file(RelMapFile *map, char *dbpath, bool lock_held, int elevel)
{
char mapfilename[MAXPGPATH];
pg_crc32c crc;
int fd;
int r;
Assert(elevel >= ERROR);
/*
* Grab the lock to prevent the file from being updated while we read it,
* unless the caller is already holding the lock. If the file is updated
* shortly after we look, the sinval signaling mechanism will make us
* re-read it before we are able to access any relation that's affected by
* the change.
*/
if (!lock_held)
LWLockAcquire(RelationMappingLock, LW_SHARED);
/*
* Open the target file.
*
* Because Windows isn't happy about the idea of renaming over a file that
* someone has open, we only open this file after acquiring the lock, and
* for the same reason, we close it before releasing the lock. That way,
* by the time write_relmap_file() acquires an exclusive lock, no one else
* will have it open.
*/
snprintf(mapfilename, sizeof(mapfilename), "%s/%s", dbpath,
RELMAPPER_FILENAME);
fd = OpenTransientFile(mapfilename, O_RDONLY | PG_BINARY);
if (fd < 0)
ereport(elevel,
(errcode_for_file_access(),
errmsg("could not open file \"%s\": %m",
mapfilename)));
/* Now read the data. */
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_RELATION_MAP_READ);
r = read(fd, map, sizeof(RelMapFile));
if (r != sizeof(RelMapFile))
{
if (r < 0)
ereport(elevel,
(errcode_for_file_access(),
errmsg("could not read file \"%s\": %m", mapfilename)));
else
ereport(elevel,
(errcode(ERRCODE_DATA_CORRUPTED),
errmsg("could not read file \"%s\": read %d of %zu",
mapfilename, r, sizeof(RelMapFile))));
}
pgstat_report_wait_end();
if (CloseTransientFile(fd) != 0)
ereport(elevel,
(errcode_for_file_access(),
errmsg("could not close file \"%s\": %m",
mapfilename)));
if (!lock_held)
LWLockRelease(RelationMappingLock);
/* check for correct magic number, etc */
if (map->magic != RELMAPPER_FILEMAGIC ||
map->num_mappings < 0 ||
map->num_mappings > MAX_MAPPINGS)
ereport(elevel,
(errmsg("relation mapping file \"%s\" contains invalid data",
mapfilename)));
/* verify the CRC */
INIT_CRC32C(crc);
COMP_CRC32C(crc, (char *) map, offsetof(RelMapFile, crc));
FIN_CRC32C(crc);
if (!EQ_CRC32C(crc, map->crc))
ereport(elevel,
(errmsg("relation mapping file \"%s\" contains incorrect checksum",
mapfilename)));
}
/*
* Write out a new shared or local map file with the given contents.
*
* The magic number and CRC are automatically updated in *newmap. On
* success, we copy the data to the appropriate permanent static variable.
*
* If write_wal is true then an appropriate WAL message is emitted.
* (It will be false for bootstrap and WAL replay cases.)
*
* If send_sinval is true then a SI invalidation message is sent.
* (This should be true except in bootstrap case.)
*
* If preserve_files is true then the storage manager is warned not to
* delete the files listed in the map.
*
* Because this may be called during WAL replay when MyDatabaseId,
* DatabasePath, etc aren't valid, we require the caller to pass in suitable
* values. Pass dbpath as "global" for the shared map.
*
* The caller is also responsible for being sure no concurrent map update
* could be happening.
*/
static void
write_relmap_file(RelMapFile *newmap, bool write_wal, bool send_sinval,
bool preserve_files, Oid dbid, Oid tsid, const char *dbpath)
{
int fd;
char mapfilename[MAXPGPATH];
char maptempfilename[MAXPGPATH];
/*
* Fill in the overhead fields and update CRC.
*/
newmap->magic = RELMAPPER_FILEMAGIC;
if (newmap->num_mappings < 0 || newmap->num_mappings > MAX_MAPPINGS)
elog(ERROR, "attempt to write bogus relation mapping");
INIT_CRC32C(newmap->crc);
COMP_CRC32C(newmap->crc, (char *) newmap, offsetof(RelMapFile, crc));
FIN_CRC32C(newmap->crc);
/*
* Construct filenames -- a temporary file that we'll create to write the
* data initially, and then the permanent name to which we will rename it.
*/
snprintf(mapfilename, sizeof(mapfilename), "%s/%s",
dbpath, RELMAPPER_FILENAME);
snprintf(maptempfilename, sizeof(maptempfilename), "%s/%s",
dbpath, RELMAPPER_TEMP_FILENAME);
/*
* Open a temporary file. If a file already exists with this name, it must
* be left over from a previous crash, so we can overwrite it. Concurrent
* calls to this function are not allowed.
*/
fd = OpenTransientFile(maptempfilename,
O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | PG_BINARY);
if (fd < 0)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode_for_file_access(),
errmsg("could not open file \"%s\": %m",
maptempfilename)));
/* Write new data to the file. */
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_RELATION_MAP_WRITE);
if (write(fd, newmap, sizeof(RelMapFile)) != sizeof(RelMapFile))
{
/* if write didn't set errno, assume problem is no disk space */
if (errno == 0)
errno = ENOSPC;
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode_for_file_access(),
errmsg("could not write file \"%s\": %m",
maptempfilename)));
}
pgstat_report_wait_end();
/* And close the file. */
if (CloseTransientFile(fd) != 0)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode_for_file_access(),
errmsg("could not close file \"%s\": %m",
maptempfilename)));
if (write_wal)
{
xl_relmap_update xlrec;
XLogRecPtr lsn;
/* now errors are fatal ... */
START_CRIT_SECTION();
xlrec.dbid = dbid;
xlrec.tsid = tsid;
xlrec.nbytes = sizeof(RelMapFile);
Revamp the WAL record format. Each WAL record now carries information about the modified relation and block(s) in a standardized format. That makes it easier to write tools that need that information, like pg_rewind, prefetching the blocks to speed up recovery, etc. There's a whole new API for building WAL records, replacing the XLogRecData chains used previously. The new API consists of XLogRegister* functions, which are called for each buffer and chunk of data that is added to the record. The new API also gives more control over when a full-page image is written, by passing flags to the XLogRegisterBuffer function. This also simplifies the XLogReadBufferForRedo() calls. The function can dig the relation and block number from the WAL record, so they no longer need to be passed as arguments. For the convenience of redo routines, XLogReader now disects each WAL record after reading it, copying the main data part and the per-block data into MAXALIGNed buffers. The data chunks are not aligned within the WAL record, but the redo routines can assume that the pointers returned by XLogRecGet* functions are. Redo routines are now passed the XLogReaderState, which contains the record in the already-disected format, instead of the plain XLogRecord. The new record format also makes the fixed size XLogRecord header smaller, by removing the xl_len field. The length of the "main data" portion is now stored at the end of the WAL record, and there's a separate header after XLogRecord for it. The alignment padding at the end of XLogRecord is also removed. This compansates for the fact that the new format would otherwise be more bulky than the old format. Reviewed by Andres Freund, Amit Kapila, Michael Paquier, Alvaro Herrera, Fujii Masao.
2014-11-20 16:56:26 +01:00
XLogBeginInsert();
XLogRegisterData((char *) (&xlrec), MinSizeOfRelmapUpdate);
XLogRegisterData((char *) newmap, sizeof(RelMapFile));
Revamp the WAL record format. Each WAL record now carries information about the modified relation and block(s) in a standardized format. That makes it easier to write tools that need that information, like pg_rewind, prefetching the blocks to speed up recovery, etc. There's a whole new API for building WAL records, replacing the XLogRecData chains used previously. The new API consists of XLogRegister* functions, which are called for each buffer and chunk of data that is added to the record. The new API also gives more control over when a full-page image is written, by passing flags to the XLogRegisterBuffer function. This also simplifies the XLogReadBufferForRedo() calls. The function can dig the relation and block number from the WAL record, so they no longer need to be passed as arguments. For the convenience of redo routines, XLogReader now disects each WAL record after reading it, copying the main data part and the per-block data into MAXALIGNed buffers. The data chunks are not aligned within the WAL record, but the redo routines can assume that the pointers returned by XLogRecGet* functions are. Redo routines are now passed the XLogReaderState, which contains the record in the already-disected format, instead of the plain XLogRecord. The new record format also makes the fixed size XLogRecord header smaller, by removing the xl_len field. The length of the "main data" portion is now stored at the end of the WAL record, and there's a separate header after XLogRecord for it. The alignment padding at the end of XLogRecord is also removed. This compansates for the fact that the new format would otherwise be more bulky than the old format. Reviewed by Andres Freund, Amit Kapila, Michael Paquier, Alvaro Herrera, Fujii Masao.
2014-11-20 16:56:26 +01:00
lsn = XLogInsert(RM_RELMAP_ID, XLOG_RELMAP_UPDATE);
/* As always, WAL must hit the disk before the data update does */
XLogFlush(lsn);
}
/*
* durable_rename() does all the hard work of making sure that we rename
* the temporary file into place in a crash-safe manner.
*
* NB: Although we instruct durable_rename() to use ERROR, we will often
* be in a critical section at this point; if so, ERROR will become PANIC.
*/
pgstat_report_wait_start(WAIT_EVENT_RELATION_MAP_REPLACE);
durable_rename(maptempfilename, mapfilename, ERROR);
pgstat_report_wait_end();
/*
* Now that the file is safely on disk, send sinval message to let other
* backends know to re-read it. We must do this inside the critical
* section: if for some reason we fail to send the message, we have to
* force a database-wide PANIC. Otherwise other backends might continue
* execution with stale mapping information, which would be catastrophic
* as soon as others began to use the now-committed data.
*/
if (send_sinval)
CacheInvalidateRelmap(dbid);
/*
* Make sure that the files listed in the map are not deleted if the outer
* transaction aborts. This had better be within the critical section
* too: it's not likely to fail, but if it did, we'd arrive at transaction
* abort with the files still vulnerable. PANICing will leave things in a
* good state on-disk.
*
* Note: we're cheating a little bit here by assuming that mapped files
* are either in pg_global or the database's default tablespace.
*/
if (preserve_files)
{
int32 i;
for (i = 0; i < newmap->num_mappings; i++)
{
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
RelFileLocator rlocator;
Change internal RelFileNode references to RelFileNumber or RelFileLocator. We have been using the term RelFileNode to refer to either (1) the integer that is used to name the sequence of files for a certain relation within the directory set aside for that tablespace/database combination; or (2) that value plus the OIDs of the tablespace and database; or occasionally (3) the whole series of files created for a relation based on those values. Using the same name for more than one thing is confusing. Replace RelFileNode with RelFileNumber when we're talking about just the single number, i.e. (1) from above, and with RelFileLocator when we're talking about all the things that are needed to locate a relation's files on disk, i.e. (2) from above. In the places where we refer to (3) as a relfilenode, instead refer to "relation storage". Since there is a ton of SQL code in the world that knows about pg_class.relfilenode, don't change the name of that column, or of other SQL-facing things that derive their name from it. On the other hand, do adjust closely-related internal terminology. For example, the structure member names dbNode and spcNode appear to be derived from the fact that the structure itself was called RelFileNode, so change those to dbOid and spcOid. Likewise, various variables with names like rnode and relnode get renamed appropriately, according to how they're being used in context. Hopefully, this is clearer than before. It is also preparation for future patches that intend to widen the relfilenumber fields from its current width of 32 bits. Variables that store a relfilenumber are now declared as type RelFileNumber rather than type Oid; right now, these are the same, but that can now more easily be changed. Dilip Kumar, per an idea from me. Reviewed also by Andres Freund. I fixed some whitespace issues, changed a couple of words in a comment, and made one other minor correction. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoamOtXbVAQf9hWFzonUo6bhhjS6toZQd7HZ-pmojtAmag@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-vTe79M8uDH1yprOU64MNFE+R3ODRuA+JWf27JbhY4hJw@mail.gmail.com
2022-07-06 17:39:09 +02:00
rlocator.spcOid = tsid;
rlocator.dbOid = dbid;
rlocator.relNumber = newmap->mappings[i].mapfilenumber;
RelationPreserveStorage(rlocator, false);
}
}
/* Critical section done */
if (write_wal)
END_CRIT_SECTION();
}
/*
* Merge the specified updates into the appropriate "real" map,
* and write out the changes. This function must be used for committing
* updates during normal multiuser operation.
*/
static void
perform_relmap_update(bool shared, const RelMapFile *updates)
{
RelMapFile newmap;
/*
* Anyone updating a relation's mapping info should take exclusive lock on
* that rel and hold it until commit. This ensures that there will not be
* concurrent updates on the same mapping value; but there could easily be
* concurrent updates on different values in the same file. We cover that
* by acquiring the RelationMappingLock, re-reading the target file to
* ensure it's up to date, applying the updates, and writing the data
* before releasing RelationMappingLock.
*
* There is only one RelationMappingLock. In principle we could try to
* have one per mapping file, but it seems unlikely to be worth the
* trouble.
*/
LWLockAcquire(RelationMappingLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
/* Be certain we see any other updates just made */
load_relmap_file(shared, true);
/* Prepare updated data in a local variable */
if (shared)
memcpy(&newmap, &shared_map, sizeof(RelMapFile));
else
memcpy(&newmap, &local_map, sizeof(RelMapFile));
/*
* Apply the updates to newmap. No new mappings should appear, unless
* somebody is adding indexes to system catalogs.
*/
merge_map_updates(&newmap, updates, allowSystemTableMods);
/* Write out the updated map and do other necessary tasks */
write_relmap_file(&newmap, true, true, true,
(shared ? InvalidOid : MyDatabaseId),
(shared ? GLOBALTABLESPACE_OID : MyDatabaseTableSpace),
(shared ? "global" : DatabasePath));
/*
* We successfully wrote the updated file, so it's now safe to rely on the
* new values in this process, too.
*/
if (shared)
memcpy(&shared_map, &newmap, sizeof(RelMapFile));
else
memcpy(&local_map, &newmap, sizeof(RelMapFile));
/* Now we can release the lock */
LWLockRelease(RelationMappingLock);
}
/*
* RELMAP resource manager's routines
*/
void
Revamp the WAL record format. Each WAL record now carries information about the modified relation and block(s) in a standardized format. That makes it easier to write tools that need that information, like pg_rewind, prefetching the blocks to speed up recovery, etc. There's a whole new API for building WAL records, replacing the XLogRecData chains used previously. The new API consists of XLogRegister* functions, which are called for each buffer and chunk of data that is added to the record. The new API also gives more control over when a full-page image is written, by passing flags to the XLogRegisterBuffer function. This also simplifies the XLogReadBufferForRedo() calls. The function can dig the relation and block number from the WAL record, so they no longer need to be passed as arguments. For the convenience of redo routines, XLogReader now disects each WAL record after reading it, copying the main data part and the per-block data into MAXALIGNed buffers. The data chunks are not aligned within the WAL record, but the redo routines can assume that the pointers returned by XLogRecGet* functions are. Redo routines are now passed the XLogReaderState, which contains the record in the already-disected format, instead of the plain XLogRecord. The new record format also makes the fixed size XLogRecord header smaller, by removing the xl_len field. The length of the "main data" portion is now stored at the end of the WAL record, and there's a separate header after XLogRecord for it. The alignment padding at the end of XLogRecord is also removed. This compansates for the fact that the new format would otherwise be more bulky than the old format. Reviewed by Andres Freund, Amit Kapila, Michael Paquier, Alvaro Herrera, Fujii Masao.
2014-11-20 16:56:26 +01:00
relmap_redo(XLogReaderState *record)
{
Revamp the WAL record format. Each WAL record now carries information about the modified relation and block(s) in a standardized format. That makes it easier to write tools that need that information, like pg_rewind, prefetching the blocks to speed up recovery, etc. There's a whole new API for building WAL records, replacing the XLogRecData chains used previously. The new API consists of XLogRegister* functions, which are called for each buffer and chunk of data that is added to the record. The new API also gives more control over when a full-page image is written, by passing flags to the XLogRegisterBuffer function. This also simplifies the XLogReadBufferForRedo() calls. The function can dig the relation and block number from the WAL record, so they no longer need to be passed as arguments. For the convenience of redo routines, XLogReader now disects each WAL record after reading it, copying the main data part and the per-block data into MAXALIGNed buffers. The data chunks are not aligned within the WAL record, but the redo routines can assume that the pointers returned by XLogRecGet* functions are. Redo routines are now passed the XLogReaderState, which contains the record in the already-disected format, instead of the plain XLogRecord. The new record format also makes the fixed size XLogRecord header smaller, by removing the xl_len field. The length of the "main data" portion is now stored at the end of the WAL record, and there's a separate header after XLogRecord for it. The alignment padding at the end of XLogRecord is also removed. This compansates for the fact that the new format would otherwise be more bulky than the old format. Reviewed by Andres Freund, Amit Kapila, Michael Paquier, Alvaro Herrera, Fujii Masao.
2014-11-20 16:56:26 +01:00
uint8 info = XLogRecGetInfo(record) & ~XLR_INFO_MASK;
/* Backup blocks are not used in relmap records */
Revamp the WAL record format. Each WAL record now carries information about the modified relation and block(s) in a standardized format. That makes it easier to write tools that need that information, like pg_rewind, prefetching the blocks to speed up recovery, etc. There's a whole new API for building WAL records, replacing the XLogRecData chains used previously. The new API consists of XLogRegister* functions, which are called for each buffer and chunk of data that is added to the record. The new API also gives more control over when a full-page image is written, by passing flags to the XLogRegisterBuffer function. This also simplifies the XLogReadBufferForRedo() calls. The function can dig the relation and block number from the WAL record, so they no longer need to be passed as arguments. For the convenience of redo routines, XLogReader now disects each WAL record after reading it, copying the main data part and the per-block data into MAXALIGNed buffers. The data chunks are not aligned within the WAL record, but the redo routines can assume that the pointers returned by XLogRecGet* functions are. Redo routines are now passed the XLogReaderState, which contains the record in the already-disected format, instead of the plain XLogRecord. The new record format also makes the fixed size XLogRecord header smaller, by removing the xl_len field. The length of the "main data" portion is now stored at the end of the WAL record, and there's a separate header after XLogRecord for it. The alignment padding at the end of XLogRecord is also removed. This compansates for the fact that the new format would otherwise be more bulky than the old format. Reviewed by Andres Freund, Amit Kapila, Michael Paquier, Alvaro Herrera, Fujii Masao.
2014-11-20 16:56:26 +01:00
Assert(!XLogRecHasAnyBlockRefs(record));
if (info == XLOG_RELMAP_UPDATE)
{
xl_relmap_update *xlrec = (xl_relmap_update *) XLogRecGetData(record);
RelMapFile newmap;
char *dbpath;
if (xlrec->nbytes != sizeof(RelMapFile))
elog(PANIC, "relmap_redo: wrong size %u in relmap update record",
xlrec->nbytes);
memcpy(&newmap, xlrec->data, sizeof(newmap));
/* We need to construct the pathname for this database */
dbpath = GetDatabasePath(xlrec->dbid, xlrec->tsid);
/*
* Write out the new map and send sinval, but of course don't write a
* new WAL entry. There's no surrounding transaction to tell to
* preserve files, either.
*
* There shouldn't be anyone else updating relmaps during WAL replay,
* but grab the lock to interlock against load_relmap_file().
Add new block-by-block strategy for CREATE DATABASE. Because this strategy logs changes on a block-by-block basis, it avoids the need to checkpoint before and after the operation. However, because it logs each changed block individually, it might generate a lot of extra write-ahead logging if the template database is large. Therefore, the older strategy remains available via a new STRATEGY parameter to CREATE DATABASE, and a corresponding --strategy option to createdb. Somewhat controversially, this patch assembles the list of relations to be copied to the new database by reading the pg_class relation of the template database. Cross-database access like this isn't normally possible, but it can be made to work here because there can't be any connections to the database being copied, nor can it contain any in-doubt transactions. Even so, we have to use lower-level interfaces than normal, since the table scan and relcache interfaces will not work for a database to which we're not connected. The advantage of this approach is that we do not need to rely on the filesystem to determine what ought to be copied, but instead on PostgreSQL's own knowledge of the database structure. This avoids, for example, copying stray files that happen to be located in the source database directory. Dilip Kumar, with a fairly large number of cosmetic changes by me. Reviewed and tested by Ashutosh Sharma, Andres Freund, John Naylor, Greg Nancarrow, Neha Sharma. Additional feedback from Bruce Momjian, Heikki Linnakangas, Julien Rouhaud, Adam Brusselback, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Tomas Vondra, Andrew Dunstan, Álvaro Herrera, and others. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYtcdxBjLh31DLxUXHxFVMPGzrU5_T=CYCvRyFHywSBUQ@mail.gmail.com
2022-03-29 17:31:43 +02:00
*
* Note that we use the same WAL record for updating the relmap of an
* existing database as we do for creating a new database. In the
* latter case, taking the relmap log and sending sinval messages is
* unnecessary, but harmless. If we wanted to avoid it, we could add a
* flag to the WAL record to indicate which operation is being
Add new block-by-block strategy for CREATE DATABASE. Because this strategy logs changes on a block-by-block basis, it avoids the need to checkpoint before and after the operation. However, because it logs each changed block individually, it might generate a lot of extra write-ahead logging if the template database is large. Therefore, the older strategy remains available via a new STRATEGY parameter to CREATE DATABASE, and a corresponding --strategy option to createdb. Somewhat controversially, this patch assembles the list of relations to be copied to the new database by reading the pg_class relation of the template database. Cross-database access like this isn't normally possible, but it can be made to work here because there can't be any connections to the database being copied, nor can it contain any in-doubt transactions. Even so, we have to use lower-level interfaces than normal, since the table scan and relcache interfaces will not work for a database to which we're not connected. The advantage of this approach is that we do not need to rely on the filesystem to determine what ought to be copied, but instead on PostgreSQL's own knowledge of the database structure. This avoids, for example, copying stray files that happen to be located in the source database directory. Dilip Kumar, with a fairly large number of cosmetic changes by me. Reviewed and tested by Ashutosh Sharma, Andres Freund, John Naylor, Greg Nancarrow, Neha Sharma. Additional feedback from Bruce Momjian, Heikki Linnakangas, Julien Rouhaud, Adam Brusselback, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Tomas Vondra, Andrew Dunstan, Álvaro Herrera, and others. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYtcdxBjLh31DLxUXHxFVMPGzrU5_T=CYCvRyFHywSBUQ@mail.gmail.com
2022-03-29 17:31:43 +02:00
* performed.
*/
LWLockAcquire(RelationMappingLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
write_relmap_file(&newmap, false, true, false,
xlrec->dbid, xlrec->tsid, dbpath);
LWLockRelease(RelationMappingLock);
pfree(dbpath);
}
else
elog(PANIC, "relmap_redo: unknown op code %u", info);
}