postgresql/src/test/regress/sql/date.sql

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

376 lines
12 KiB
MySQL
Raw Normal View History

--
-- DATE
--
CREATE TABLE DATE_TBL (f1 date);
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1957-04-09');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1957-06-13');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1996-02-28');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1996-02-29');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1996-03-01');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1996-03-02');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1997-02-28');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1997-02-29');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1997-03-01');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1997-03-02');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('2000-04-01');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('2000-04-02');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('2000-04-03');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('2038-04-08');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('2039-04-09');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('2040-04-10');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('2040-04-10 BC');
SELECT f1 FROM DATE_TBL;
SELECT f1 FROM DATE_TBL WHERE f1 < '2000-01-01';
SELECT f1 FROM DATE_TBL
WHERE f1 BETWEEN '2000-01-01' AND '2001-01-01';
--
-- Check all the documented input formats
--
SET datestyle TO iso; -- display results in ISO
SET datestyle TO ymd;
SELECT date 'January 8, 1999';
SELECT date '1999-01-08';
SELECT date '1999-01-18';
SELECT date '1/8/1999';
SELECT date '1/18/1999';
SELECT date '18/1/1999';
SELECT date '01/02/03';
SELECT date '19990108';
SELECT date '990108';
SELECT date '1999.008';
SELECT date 'J2451187';
SELECT date 'January 8, 99 BC';
SELECT date '99-Jan-08';
SELECT date '1999-Jan-08';
SELECT date '08-Jan-99';
SELECT date '08-Jan-1999';
SELECT date 'Jan-08-99';
SELECT date 'Jan-08-1999';
SELECT date '99-08-Jan';
SELECT date '1999-08-Jan';
SELECT date '99 Jan 08';
SELECT date '1999 Jan 08';
SELECT date '08 Jan 99';
SELECT date '08 Jan 1999';
SELECT date 'Jan 08 99';
SELECT date 'Jan 08 1999';
SELECT date '99 08 Jan';
SELECT date '1999 08 Jan';
SELECT date '99-01-08';
SELECT date '1999-01-08';
SELECT date '08-01-99';
SELECT date '08-01-1999';
SELECT date '01-08-99';
SELECT date '01-08-1999';
SELECT date '99-08-01';
SELECT date '1999-08-01';
SELECT date '99 01 08';
SELECT date '1999 01 08';
SELECT date '08 01 99';
SELECT date '08 01 1999';
SELECT date '01 08 99';
SELECT date '01 08 1999';
SELECT date '99 08 01';
SELECT date '1999 08 01';
SET datestyle TO dmy;
SELECT date 'January 8, 1999';
SELECT date '1999-01-08';
SELECT date '1999-01-18';
SELECT date '1/8/1999';
SELECT date '1/18/1999';
SELECT date '18/1/1999';
SELECT date '01/02/03';
SELECT date '19990108';
SELECT date '990108';
SELECT date '1999.008';
SELECT date 'J2451187';
SELECT date 'January 8, 99 BC';
SELECT date '99-Jan-08';
SELECT date '1999-Jan-08';
SELECT date '08-Jan-99';
SELECT date '08-Jan-1999';
SELECT date 'Jan-08-99';
SELECT date 'Jan-08-1999';
SELECT date '99-08-Jan';
SELECT date '1999-08-Jan';
SELECT date '99 Jan 08';
SELECT date '1999 Jan 08';
SELECT date '08 Jan 99';
SELECT date '08 Jan 1999';
SELECT date 'Jan 08 99';
SELECT date 'Jan 08 1999';
SELECT date '99 08 Jan';
SELECT date '1999 08 Jan';
SELECT date '99-01-08';
SELECT date '1999-01-08';
SELECT date '08-01-99';
SELECT date '08-01-1999';
SELECT date '01-08-99';
SELECT date '01-08-1999';
SELECT date '99-08-01';
SELECT date '1999-08-01';
SELECT date '99 01 08';
SELECT date '1999 01 08';
SELECT date '08 01 99';
SELECT date '08 01 1999';
SELECT date '01 08 99';
SELECT date '01 08 1999';
SELECT date '99 08 01';
SELECT date '1999 08 01';
SET datestyle TO mdy;
SELECT date 'January 8, 1999';
SELECT date '1999-01-08';
SELECT date '1999-01-18';
SELECT date '1/8/1999';
SELECT date '1/18/1999';
SELECT date '18/1/1999';
SELECT date '01/02/03';
SELECT date '19990108';
SELECT date '990108';
SELECT date '1999.008';
SELECT date 'J2451187';
SELECT date 'January 8, 99 BC';
SELECT date '99-Jan-08';
SELECT date '1999-Jan-08';
SELECT date '08-Jan-99';
SELECT date '08-Jan-1999';
SELECT date 'Jan-08-99';
SELECT date 'Jan-08-1999';
SELECT date '99-08-Jan';
SELECT date '1999-08-Jan';
SELECT date '99 Jan 08';
SELECT date '1999 Jan 08';
SELECT date '08 Jan 99';
SELECT date '08 Jan 1999';
SELECT date 'Jan 08 99';
SELECT date 'Jan 08 1999';
SELECT date '99 08 Jan';
SELECT date '1999 08 Jan';
SELECT date '99-01-08';
SELECT date '1999-01-08';
SELECT date '08-01-99';
SELECT date '08-01-1999';
SELECT date '01-08-99';
SELECT date '01-08-1999';
SELECT date '99-08-01';
SELECT date '1999-08-01';
SELECT date '99 01 08';
SELECT date '1999 01 08';
SELECT date '08 01 99';
SELECT date '08 01 1999';
SELECT date '01 08 99';
SELECT date '01 08 1999';
SELECT date '99 08 01';
SELECT date '1999 08 01';
-- Check upper and lower limits of date range
SELECT date '4714-11-24 BC';
SELECT date '4714-11-23 BC'; -- out of range
SELECT date '5874897-12-31';
SELECT date '5874898-01-01'; -- out of range
-- Test non-error-throwing API
SELECT pg_input_is_valid('now', 'date');
SELECT pg_input_is_valid('garbage', 'date');
SELECT pg_input_is_valid('6874898-01-01', 'date');
SELECT * FROM pg_input_error_info('garbage', 'date');
SELECT * FROM pg_input_error_info('6874898-01-01', 'date');
RESET datestyle;
--
-- Simple math
-- Leave most of it for the horology tests
--
SELECT f1 - date '2000-01-01' AS "Days From 2K" FROM DATE_TBL;
SELECT f1 - date 'epoch' AS "Days From Epoch" FROM DATE_TBL;
SELECT date 'yesterday' - date 'today' AS "One day";
SELECT date 'today' - date 'tomorrow' AS "One day";
SELECT date 'yesterday' - date 'tomorrow' AS "Two days";
SELECT date 'tomorrow' - date 'today' AS "One day";
SELECT date 'today' - date 'yesterday' AS "One day";
SELECT date 'tomorrow' - date 'yesterday' AS "Two days";
--
-- test extract!
--
SELECT f1 as "date",
date_part('year', f1) AS year,
date_part('month', f1) AS month,
date_part('day', f1) AS day,
date_part('quarter', f1) AS quarter,
date_part('decade', f1) AS decade,
date_part('century', f1) AS century,
date_part('millennium', f1) AS millennium,
date_part('isoyear', f1) AS isoyear,
date_part('week', f1) AS week,
date_part('dow', f1) AS dow,
date_part('isodow', f1) AS isodow,
date_part('doy', f1) AS doy,
date_part('julian', f1) AS julian,
date_part('epoch', f1) AS epoch
FROM date_tbl;
--
-- epoch
--
SELECT EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM DATE '1970-01-01'); -- 0
--
-- century
--
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '0101-12-31 BC'); -- -2
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '0100-12-31 BC'); -- -1
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '0001-12-31 BC'); -- -1
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '0001-01-01'); -- 1
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '0001-01-01 AD'); -- 1
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '1900-12-31'); -- 19
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '1901-01-01'); -- 20
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '2000-12-31'); -- 20
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '2001-01-01'); -- 21
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM CURRENT_DATE)>=21 AS True; -- true
--
-- millennium
--
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLENNIUM FROM DATE '0001-12-31 BC'); -- -1
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLENNIUM FROM DATE '0001-01-01 AD'); -- 1
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLENNIUM FROM DATE '1000-12-31'); -- 1
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLENNIUM FROM DATE '1001-01-01'); -- 2
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLENNIUM FROM DATE '2000-12-31'); -- 2
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLENNIUM FROM DATE '2001-01-01'); -- 3
-- next test to be fixed on the turn of the next millennium;-)
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLENNIUM FROM CURRENT_DATE); -- 3
> After all that about numbering centuries and millenia correctly, > why does CVS tip still give me > > regression=# select extract(century from now()); > date_part > ----------- > 20 > (1 row) > [ ... looks in code ... ] > > Apparently it's because you fixed only timestamp_part, and not > timestamptz_part. I'm not too sure about what timestamp_trunc or > timestamptz_trunc should do, but they may be wrong as well. Sigh... as usual, what is not tested does not work:-( > Could we have a more complete patch? Please find a submission attached. I hope it really fixes all decade, century and millenium issues for extract and *_trunc functions on interval and other timestamp types. If someone could check that the results are reasonnable, it would be great. I indeed overlooked the fact that there were two functions. The patch fixes the code so that both variants agree. I added comments to interval extractions, because it relies on the C division to have a negative remainder: -7/10 = 0 and remains -7. As for *_trunc functions, I have chosen to put the first year of the century or millennium: -100, 1, 101... 1001 2001 etc. Indeed, I don't think it would make sense to put 2000 (last year of the 2nd millennium) for rounding all years of the third millenium. I also fixed the code so that all decades last 10 years and decade 199 means the 1990's. I have added some tests that are relevant to deal with tricky cases. The formula may be simplified, but all these cases must pass. Please keep them. Fabien Coelho
2004-08-20 05:45:14 +02:00
--
-- decade
--
SELECT EXTRACT(DECADE FROM DATE '1994-12-25'); -- 199
SELECT EXTRACT(DECADE FROM DATE '0010-01-01'); -- 1
SELECT EXTRACT(DECADE FROM DATE '0009-12-31'); -- 0
SELECT EXTRACT(DECADE FROM DATE '0001-01-01 BC'); -- 0
SELECT EXTRACT(DECADE FROM DATE '0002-12-31 BC'); -- -1
SELECT EXTRACT(DECADE FROM DATE '0011-01-01 BC'); -- -1
SELECT EXTRACT(DECADE FROM DATE '0012-12-31 BC'); -- -2
--
-- all possible fields
--
SELECT EXTRACT(MICROSECONDS FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLISECONDS FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
SELECT EXTRACT(SECOND FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
SELECT EXTRACT(MINUTE FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
SELECT EXTRACT(HOUR FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
SELECT EXTRACT(MONTH FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
SELECT EXTRACT(YEAR FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
SELECT EXTRACT(YEAR FROM DATE '2020-08-11 BC');
SELECT EXTRACT(DECADE FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLENNIUM FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
SELECT EXTRACT(ISOYEAR FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
SELECT EXTRACT(ISOYEAR FROM DATE '2020-08-11 BC');
SELECT EXTRACT(QUARTER FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
SELECT EXTRACT(WEEK FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
SELECT EXTRACT(DOW FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
SELECT EXTRACT(DOW FROM DATE '2020-08-16');
SELECT EXTRACT(ISODOW FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
SELECT EXTRACT(ISODOW FROM DATE '2020-08-16');
SELECT EXTRACT(DOY FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
SELECT EXTRACT(TIMEZONE FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
SELECT EXTRACT(TIMEZONE_M FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
SELECT EXTRACT(TIMEZONE_H FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
SELECT EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
SELECT EXTRACT(JULIAN FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
--
> After all that about numbering centuries and millenia correctly, > why does CVS tip still give me > > regression=# select extract(century from now()); > date_part > ----------- > 20 > (1 row) > [ ... looks in code ... ] > > Apparently it's because you fixed only timestamp_part, and not > timestamptz_part. I'm not too sure about what timestamp_trunc or > timestamptz_trunc should do, but they may be wrong as well. Sigh... as usual, what is not tested does not work:-( > Could we have a more complete patch? Please find a submission attached. I hope it really fixes all decade, century and millenium issues for extract and *_trunc functions on interval and other timestamp types. If someone could check that the results are reasonnable, it would be great. I indeed overlooked the fact that there were two functions. The patch fixes the code so that both variants agree. I added comments to interval extractions, because it relies on the C division to have a negative remainder: -7/10 = 0 and remains -7. As for *_trunc functions, I have chosen to put the first year of the century or millennium: -100, 1, 101... 1001 2001 etc. Indeed, I don't think it would make sense to put 2000 (last year of the 2nd millennium) for rounding all years of the third millenium. I also fixed the code so that all decades last 10 years and decade 199 means the 1990's. I have added some tests that are relevant to deal with tricky cases. The formula may be simplified, but all these cases must pass. Please keep them. Fabien Coelho
2004-08-20 05:45:14 +02:00
-- test trunc function!
--
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('MILLENNIUM', TIMESTAMP '1970-03-20 04:30:00.00000'); -- 1001
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('MILLENNIUM', DATE '1970-03-20'); -- 1001-01-01
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('CENTURY', TIMESTAMP '1970-03-20 04:30:00.00000'); -- 1901
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('CENTURY', DATE '1970-03-20'); -- 1901
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('CENTURY', DATE '2004-08-10'); -- 2001-01-01
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('CENTURY', DATE '0002-02-04'); -- 0001-01-01
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('CENTURY', DATE '0055-08-10 BC'); -- 0100-01-01 BC
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('DECADE', DATE '1993-12-25'); -- 1990-01-01
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('DECADE', DATE '0004-12-25'); -- 0001-01-01 BC
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('DECADE', DATE '0002-12-31 BC'); -- 0011-01-01 BC
--
-- test infinity
--
select 'infinity'::date, '-infinity'::date;
select 'infinity'::date > 'today'::date as t;
select '-infinity'::date < 'today'::date as t;
select isfinite('infinity'::date), isfinite('-infinity'::date), isfinite('today'::date);
select 'infinity'::date = '+infinity'::date as t;
--
-- oscillating fields from non-finite date:
--
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- NULL
SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM DATE '-infinity'); -- NULL
-- all supported fields
SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- NULL
SELECT EXTRACT(MONTH FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- NULL
SELECT EXTRACT(QUARTER FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- NULL
SELECT EXTRACT(WEEK FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- NULL
SELECT EXTRACT(DOW FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- NULL
SELECT EXTRACT(ISODOW FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- NULL
SELECT EXTRACT(DOY FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- NULL
--
-- monotonic fields from non-finite date:
--
SELECT EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- Infinity
SELECT EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM DATE '-infinity'); -- -Infinity
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
-- all supported fields
SELECT EXTRACT(YEAR FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- Infinity
SELECT EXTRACT(DECADE FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- Infinity
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- Infinity
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLENNIUM FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- Infinity
SELECT EXTRACT(JULIAN FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- Infinity
SELECT EXTRACT(ISOYEAR FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- Infinity
SELECT EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- Infinity
--
-- wrong fields from non-finite date:
--
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
SELECT EXTRACT(MICROSEC FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- error
-- test constructors
select make_date(2013, 7, 15);
select make_date(-44, 3, 15);
select make_time(8, 20, 0.0);
-- should fail
select make_date(0, 7, 15);
select make_date(2013, 2, 30);
select make_date(2013, 13, 1);
select make_date(2013, 11, -1);
select make_time(10, 55, 100.1);
select make_time(24, 0, 2.1);