postgresql/src/backend/commands/trigger.c

5842 lines
176 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

1997-08-31 13:40:13 +02:00
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* trigger.c
* PostgreSQL TRIGGERs support code.
1997-08-31 13:40:13 +02:00
*
2017-01-03 19:48:53 +01:00
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2017, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
* IDENTIFICATION
2010-09-20 22:08:53 +02:00
* src/backend/commands/trigger.c
*
1997-08-31 13:40:13 +02:00
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#include "postgres.h"
#include "access/genam.h"
#include "access/heapam.h"
#include "access/sysattr.h"
#include "access/htup_details.h"
#include "access/xact.h"
1997-09-04 15:19:01 +02:00
#include "catalog/catalog.h"
#include "catalog/dependency.h"
#include "catalog/indexing.h"
#include "catalog/objectaccess.h"
#include "catalog/pg_constraint.h"
#include "catalog/pg_constraint_fn.h"
#include "catalog/pg_inherits_fn.h"
#include "catalog/pg_proc.h"
1997-08-31 13:40:13 +02:00
#include "catalog/pg_trigger.h"
#include "catalog/pg_type.h"
#include "commands/dbcommands.h"
#include "commands/defrem.h"
#include "commands/trigger.h"
#include "executor/executor.h"
1997-09-04 15:19:01 +02:00
#include "miscadmin.h"
#include "nodes/bitmapset.h"
#include "nodes/makefuncs.h"
#include "optimizer/clauses.h"
#include "optimizer/var.h"
#include "parser/parse_clause.h"
#include "parser/parse_collate.h"
#include "parser/parse_func.h"
#include "parser/parse_relation.h"
#include "parser/parsetree.h"
#include "pgstat.h"
#include "rewrite/rewriteManip.h"
#include "storage/bufmgr.h"
#include "storage/lmgr.h"
#include "tcop/utility.h"
1997-09-04 15:19:01 +02:00
#include "utils/acl.h"
1999-07-16 07:00:38 +02:00
#include "utils/builtins.h"
#include "utils/bytea.h"
#include "utils/fmgroids.h"
1999-07-16 07:00:38 +02:00
#include "utils/inval.h"
#include "utils/lsyscache.h"
#include "utils/memutils.h"
#include "utils/rel.h"
#include "utils/snapmgr.h"
1999-07-16 07:00:38 +02:00
#include "utils/syscache.h"
#include "utils/tqual.h"
#include "utils/tuplestore.h"
1997-09-04 15:19:01 +02:00
/* GUC variables */
int SessionReplicationRole = SESSION_REPLICATION_ROLE_ORIGIN;
/* How many levels deep into trigger execution are we? */
static int MyTriggerDepth = 0;
/*
* Note that similar macros also exist in executor/execMain.c. There does not
* appear to be any good header to put them into, given the structures that
* they use, so we let them be duplicated. Be sure to update all if one needs
* to be changed, however.
*/
#define GetUpdatedColumns(relinfo, estate) \
(rt_fetch((relinfo)->ri_RangeTableIndex, (estate)->es_range_table)->updatedCols)
/* Local function prototypes */
static void ConvertTriggerToFK(CreateTrigStmt *stmt, Oid funcoid);
static void SetTriggerFlags(TriggerDesc *trigdesc, Trigger *trigger);
static HeapTuple GetTupleForTrigger(EState *estate,
EPQState *epqstate,
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
ItemPointer tid,
Improve concurrency of foreign key locking This patch introduces two additional lock modes for tuples: "SELECT FOR KEY SHARE" and "SELECT FOR NO KEY UPDATE". These don't block each other, in contrast with already existing "SELECT FOR SHARE" and "SELECT FOR UPDATE". UPDATE commands that do not modify the values stored in the columns that are part of the key of the tuple now grab a SELECT FOR NO KEY UPDATE lock on the tuple, allowing them to proceed concurrently with tuple locks of the FOR KEY SHARE variety. Foreign key triggers now use FOR KEY SHARE instead of FOR SHARE; this means the concurrency improvement applies to them, which is the whole point of this patch. The added tuple lock semantics require some rejiggering of the multixact module, so that the locking level that each transaction is holding can be stored alongside its Xid. Also, multixacts now need to persist across server restarts and crashes, because they can now represent not only tuple locks, but also tuple updates. This means we need more careful tracking of lifetime of pg_multixact SLRU files; since they now persist longer, we require more infrastructure to figure out when they can be removed. pg_upgrade also needs to be careful to copy pg_multixact files over from the old server to the new, or at least part of multixact.c state, depending on the versions of the old and new servers. Tuple time qualification rules (HeapTupleSatisfies routines) need to be careful not to consider tuples with the "is multi" infomask bit set as being only locked; they might need to look up MultiXact values (i.e. possibly do pg_multixact I/O) to find out the Xid that updated a tuple, whereas they previously were assured to only use information readily available from the tuple header. This is considered acceptable, because the extra I/O would involve cases that would previously cause some commands to block waiting for concurrent transactions to finish. Another important change is the fact that locking tuples that have previously been updated causes the future versions to be marked as locked, too; this is essential for correctness of foreign key checks. This causes additional WAL-logging, also (there was previously a single WAL record for a locked tuple; now there are as many as updated copies of the tuple there exist.) With all this in place, contention related to tuples being checked by foreign key rules should be much reduced. As a bonus, the old behavior that a subtransaction grabbing a stronger tuple lock than the parent (sub)transaction held on a given tuple and later aborting caused the weaker lock to be lost, has been fixed. Many new spec files were added for isolation tester framework, to ensure overall behavior is sane. There's probably room for several more tests. There were several reviewers of this patch; in particular, Noah Misch and Andres Freund spent considerable time in it. Original idea for the patch came from Simon Riggs, after a problem report by Joel Jacobson. Most code is from me, with contributions from Marti Raudsepp, Alexander Shulgin, Noah Misch and Andres Freund. This patch was discussed in several pgsql-hackers threads; the most important start at the following message-ids: AANLkTimo9XVcEzfiBR-ut3KVNDkjm2Vxh+t8kAmWjPuv@mail.gmail.com 1290721684-sup-3951@alvh.no-ip.org 1294953201-sup-2099@alvh.no-ip.org 1320343602-sup-2290@alvh.no-ip.org 1339690386-sup-8927@alvh.no-ip.org 4FE5FF020200002500048A3D@gw.wicourts.gov 4FEAB90A0200002500048B7D@gw.wicourts.gov
2013-01-23 16:04:59 +01:00
LockTupleMode lockmode,
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
TupleTableSlot **newSlot);
static bool TriggerEnabled(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
Trigger *trigger, TriggerEvent event,
Bitmapset *modifiedCols,
HeapTuple oldtup, HeapTuple newtup);
static HeapTuple ExecCallTriggerFunc(TriggerData *trigdata,
int tgindx,
FmgrInfo *finfo,
Instrumentation *instr,
MemoryContext per_tuple_context);
static void AfterTriggerSaveEvent(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
int event, bool row_trigger,
HeapTuple oldtup, HeapTuple newtup,
List *recheckIndexes, Bitmapset *modifiedCols,
TransitionCaptureState *transition_capture);
static void AfterTriggerEnlargeQueryState(void);
static bool before_stmt_triggers_fired(Oid relid, CmdType cmdType);
1997-09-04 15:19:01 +02:00
/*
* Create a trigger. Returns the address of the created trigger.
*
* queryString is the source text of the CREATE TRIGGER command.
* This must be supplied if a whenClause is specified, else it can be NULL.
*
* relOid, if nonzero, is the relation on which the trigger should be
* created. If zero, the name provided in the statement will be looked up.
*
* refRelOid, if nonzero, is the relation to which the constraint trigger
* refers. If zero, the constraint relation name provided in the statement
* will be looked up as needed.
*
* constraintOid, if nonzero, says that this trigger is being created
* internally to implement that constraint. A suitable pg_depend entry will
* be made to link the trigger to that constraint. constraintOid is zero when
* executing a user-entered CREATE TRIGGER command. (For CREATE CONSTRAINT
* TRIGGER, we build a pg_constraint entry internally.)
*
* indexOid, if nonzero, is the OID of an index associated with the constraint.
* We do nothing with this except store it into pg_trigger.tgconstrindid.
*
* If isInternal is true then this is an internally-generated trigger.
* This argument sets the tgisinternal field of the pg_trigger entry, and
* if TRUE causes us to modify the given trigger name to ensure uniqueness.
*
* When isInternal is not true we require ACL_TRIGGER permissions on the
* relation, as well as ACL_EXECUTE on the trigger function. For internal
* triggers the caller must apply any required permission checks.
*
* Note: can return InvalidObjectAddress if we decided to not create a trigger
* at all, but a foreign-key constraint. This is a kluge for backwards
* compatibility.
*/
ObjectAddress
CreateTrigger(CreateTrigStmt *stmt, const char *queryString,
Oid relOid, Oid refRelOid, Oid constraintOid, Oid indexOid,
bool isInternal)
1997-08-31 13:40:13 +02:00
{
int16 tgtype;
int ncolumns;
int16 *columns;
int2vector *tgattr;
Node *whenClause;
List *whenRtable;
char *qual;
Datum values[Natts_pg_trigger];
bool nulls[Natts_pg_trigger];
Relation rel;
AclResult aclresult;
Relation tgrel;
2002-09-04 22:31:48 +02:00
SysScanDesc tgscan;
ScanKeyData key;
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
Relation pgrel;
HeapTuple tuple;
Oid fargtypes[1]; /* dummy */
Oid funcoid;
Oid funcrettype;
Oid trigoid;
char internaltrigname[NAMEDATALEN];
char *trigname;
Oid constrrelid = InvalidOid;
2002-09-04 22:31:48 +02:00
ObjectAddress myself,
referenced;
char *oldtablename = NULL;
char *newtablename = NULL;
if (OidIsValid(relOid))
rel = heap_open(relOid, ShareRowExclusiveLock);
else
rel = heap_openrv(stmt->relation, ShareRowExclusiveLock);
/*
* Triggers must be on tables or views, and there are additional
* relation-type-specific restrictions.
*/
Implement table partitioning. Table partitioning is like table inheritance and reuses much of the existing infrastructure, but there are some important differences. The parent is called a partitioned table and is always empty; it may not have indexes or non-inherited constraints, since those make no sense for a relation with no data of its own. The children are called partitions and contain all of the actual data. Each partition has an implicit partitioning constraint. Multiple inheritance is not allowed, and partitioning and inheritance can't be mixed. Partitions can't have extra columns and may not allow nulls unless the parent does. Tuples inserted into the parent are automatically routed to the correct partition, so tuple-routing ON INSERT triggers are not needed. Tuple routing isn't yet supported for partitions which are foreign tables, and it doesn't handle updates that cross partition boundaries. Currently, tables can be range-partitioned or list-partitioned. List partitioning is limited to a single column, but range partitioning can involve multiple columns. A partitioning "column" can be an expression. Because table partitioning is less general than table inheritance, it is hoped that it will be easier to reason about properties of partitions, and therefore that this will serve as a better foundation for a variety of possible optimizations, including query planner optimizations. The tuple routing based which this patch does based on the implicit partitioning constraints is an example of this, but it seems likely that many other useful optimizations are also possible. Amit Langote, reviewed and tested by Robert Haas, Ashutosh Bapat, Amit Kapila, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi, Corey Huinker, Jaime Casanova, Rushabh Lathia, Erik Rijkers, among others. Minor revisions by me.
2016-12-07 19:17:43 +01:00
if (rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_RELATION ||
rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE)
{
/* Tables can't have INSTEAD OF triggers */
if (stmt->timing != TRIGGER_TYPE_BEFORE &&
stmt->timing != TRIGGER_TYPE_AFTER)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE),
errmsg("\"%s\" is a table",
RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
errdetail("Tables cannot have INSTEAD OF triggers.")));
Implement table partitioning. Table partitioning is like table inheritance and reuses much of the existing infrastructure, but there are some important differences. The parent is called a partitioned table and is always empty; it may not have indexes or non-inherited constraints, since those make no sense for a relation with no data of its own. The children are called partitions and contain all of the actual data. Each partition has an implicit partitioning constraint. Multiple inheritance is not allowed, and partitioning and inheritance can't be mixed. Partitions can't have extra columns and may not allow nulls unless the parent does. Tuples inserted into the parent are automatically routed to the correct partition, so tuple-routing ON INSERT triggers are not needed. Tuple routing isn't yet supported for partitions which are foreign tables, and it doesn't handle updates that cross partition boundaries. Currently, tables can be range-partitioned or list-partitioned. List partitioning is limited to a single column, but range partitioning can involve multiple columns. A partitioning "column" can be an expression. Because table partitioning is less general than table inheritance, it is hoped that it will be easier to reason about properties of partitions, and therefore that this will serve as a better foundation for a variety of possible optimizations, including query planner optimizations. The tuple routing based which this patch does based on the implicit partitioning constraints is an example of this, but it seems likely that many other useful optimizations are also possible. Amit Langote, reviewed and tested by Robert Haas, Ashutosh Bapat, Amit Kapila, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi, Corey Huinker, Jaime Casanova, Rushabh Lathia, Erik Rijkers, among others. Minor revisions by me.
2016-12-07 19:17:43 +01:00
/* Disallow ROW triggers on partitioned tables */
if (stmt->row && rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE),
errmsg("\"%s\" is a partitioned table",
RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
errdetail("Partitioned tables cannot have ROW triggers.")));
}
else if (rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_VIEW)
{
/*
* Views can have INSTEAD OF triggers (which we check below are
* row-level), or statement-level BEFORE/AFTER triggers.
*/
if (stmt->timing != TRIGGER_TYPE_INSTEAD && stmt->row)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE),
errmsg("\"%s\" is a view",
RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
errdetail("Views cannot have row-level BEFORE or AFTER triggers.")));
/* Disallow TRUNCATE triggers on VIEWs */
if (TRIGGER_FOR_TRUNCATE(stmt->events))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE),
errmsg("\"%s\" is a view",
RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
errdetail("Views cannot have TRUNCATE triggers.")));
}
else if (rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_FOREIGN_TABLE)
{
if (stmt->timing != TRIGGER_TYPE_BEFORE &&
stmt->timing != TRIGGER_TYPE_AFTER)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE),
errmsg("\"%s\" is a foreign table",
RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
errdetail("Foreign tables cannot have INSTEAD OF triggers.")));
if (TRIGGER_FOR_TRUNCATE(stmt->events))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE),
errmsg("\"%s\" is a foreign table",
RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
errdetail("Foreign tables cannot have TRUNCATE triggers.")));
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
/*
* We disallow constraint triggers to protect the assumption that
* triggers on FKs can't be deferred. See notes with AfterTriggers
* data structures, below.
*/
if (stmt->isconstraint)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE),
errmsg("\"%s\" is a foreign table",
RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
errdetail("Foreign tables cannot have constraint triggers.")));
}
else
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE),
errmsg("\"%s\" is not a table or view",
RelationGetRelationName(rel))));
if (!allowSystemTableMods && IsSystemRelation(rel))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
errmsg("permission denied: \"%s\" is a system catalog",
RelationGetRelationName(rel))));
1997-08-31 13:40:13 +02:00
if (stmt->isconstraint)
{
/*
* We must take a lock on the target relation to protect against
* concurrent drop. It's not clear that AccessShareLock is strong
* enough, but we certainly need at least that much... otherwise, we
* might end up creating a pg_constraint entry referencing a
* nonexistent table.
*/
if (OidIsValid(refRelOid))
{
LockRelationOid(refRelOid, AccessShareLock);
constrrelid = refRelOid;
}
else if (stmt->constrrel != NULL)
constrrelid = RangeVarGetRelid(stmt->constrrel, AccessShareLock,
false);
}
/* permission checks */
if (!isInternal)
{
aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(RelationGetRelid(rel), GetUserId(),
ACL_TRIGGER);
if (aclresult != ACLCHECK_OK)
aclcheck_error(aclresult, ACL_KIND_CLASS,
RelationGetRelationName(rel));
if (OidIsValid(constrrelid))
{
aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(constrrelid, GetUserId(),
ACL_TRIGGER);
if (aclresult != ACLCHECK_OK)
aclcheck_error(aclresult, ACL_KIND_CLASS,
get_rel_name(constrrelid));
}
}
/* Compute tgtype */
TRIGGER_CLEAR_TYPE(tgtype);
if (stmt->row)
TRIGGER_SETT_ROW(tgtype);
tgtype |= stmt->timing;
tgtype |= stmt->events;
/* Disallow ROW-level TRUNCATE triggers */
if (TRIGGER_FOR_ROW(tgtype) && TRIGGER_FOR_TRUNCATE(tgtype))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("TRUNCATE FOR EACH ROW triggers are not supported")));
/* INSTEAD triggers must be row-level, and can't have WHEN or columns */
if (TRIGGER_FOR_INSTEAD(tgtype))
{
if (!TRIGGER_FOR_ROW(tgtype))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("INSTEAD OF triggers must be FOR EACH ROW")));
if (stmt->whenClause)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("INSTEAD OF triggers cannot have WHEN conditions")));
if (stmt->columns != NIL)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("INSTEAD OF triggers cannot have column lists")));
}
/*
* We don't yet support naming ROW transition variables, but the parser
* recognizes the syntax so we can give a nicer message here.
*
* Per standard, REFERENCING TABLE names are only allowed on AFTER
* triggers. Per standard, REFERENCING ROW names are not allowed with FOR
* EACH STATEMENT. Per standard, each OLD/NEW, ROW/TABLE permutation is
* only allowed once. Per standard, OLD may not be specified when
* creating a trigger only for INSERT, and NEW may not be specified when
* creating a trigger only for DELETE.
*
* Notice that the standard allows an AFTER ... FOR EACH ROW trigger to
* reference both ROW and TABLE transition data.
*/
if (stmt->transitionRels != NIL)
{
List *varList = stmt->transitionRels;
ListCell *lc;
foreach(lc, varList)
{
TriggerTransition *tt = lfirst_node(TriggerTransition, lc);
if (!(tt->isTable))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("ROW variable naming in the REFERENCING clause is not supported"),
errhint("Use OLD TABLE or NEW TABLE for naming transition tables.")));
/*
* Because of the above test, we omit further ROW-related testing
* below. If we later allow naming OLD and NEW ROW variables,
* adjustments will be needed below.
*/
if (rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_FOREIGN_TABLE)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE),
errmsg("\"%s\" is a foreign table",
RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
errdetail("Triggers on foreign tables cannot have transition tables.")));
if (rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_VIEW)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE),
errmsg("\"%s\" is a view",
RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
errdetail("Triggers on views cannot have transition tables.")));
/*
* We currently don't allow row-level triggers with transition
* tables on partition or inheritance children. Such triggers
* would somehow need to see tuples converted to the format of the
* table they're attached to, and it's not clear which subset of
* tuples each child should see. See also the prohibitions in
* ATExecAttachPartition() and ATExecAddInherit().
*/
if (TRIGGER_FOR_ROW(tgtype) && has_superclass(rel->rd_id))
{
/* Use appropriate error message. */
if (rel->rd_rel->relispartition)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("ROW triggers with transition tables are not supported on partitions")));
else
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("ROW triggers with transition tables are not supported on inheritance children")));
}
if (stmt->timing != TRIGGER_TYPE_AFTER)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_OBJECT_DEFINITION),
errmsg("transition table name can only be specified for an AFTER trigger")));
if (TRIGGER_FOR_TRUNCATE(tgtype))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("TRUNCATE triggers with transition tables are not supported")));
/*
* We currently don't allow multi-event triggers ("INSERT OR
* UPDATE") with transition tables, because it's not clear how to
* handle INSERT ... ON CONFLICT statements which can fire both
* INSERT and UPDATE triggers. We show the inserted tuples to
* INSERT triggers and the updated tuples to UPDATE triggers, but
* it's not yet clear what INSERT OR UPDATE trigger should see.
* This restriction could be lifted if we can decide on the right
* semantics in a later release.
*/
if (((TRIGGER_FOR_INSERT(tgtype) ? 1 : 0) +
(TRIGGER_FOR_UPDATE(tgtype) ? 1 : 0) +
(TRIGGER_FOR_DELETE(tgtype) ? 1 : 0)) != 1)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
2017-09-11 17:20:47 +02:00
errmsg("transition tables cannot be specified for triggers with more than one event")));
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
/*
* We currently don't allow column-specific triggers with
* transition tables. Per spec, that seems to require
* accumulating separate transition tables for each combination of
* columns, which is a lot of work for a rather marginal feature.
*/
if (stmt->columns != NIL)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("transition tables cannot be specified for triggers with column lists")));
/*
* We disallow constraint triggers with transition tables, to
* protect the assumption that such triggers can't be deferred.
* See notes with AfterTriggers data structures, below.
*
* Currently this is enforced by the grammar, so just Assert here.
*/
Assert(!stmt->isconstraint);
if (tt->isNew)
{
if (!(TRIGGER_FOR_INSERT(tgtype) ||
TRIGGER_FOR_UPDATE(tgtype)))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_OBJECT_DEFINITION),
errmsg("NEW TABLE can only be specified for an INSERT or UPDATE trigger")));
if (newtablename != NULL)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_OBJECT_DEFINITION),
errmsg("NEW TABLE cannot be specified multiple times")));
newtablename = tt->name;
}
else
{
if (!(TRIGGER_FOR_DELETE(tgtype) ||
TRIGGER_FOR_UPDATE(tgtype)))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_OBJECT_DEFINITION),
errmsg("OLD TABLE can only be specified for a DELETE or UPDATE trigger")));
if (oldtablename != NULL)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_OBJECT_DEFINITION),
errmsg("OLD TABLE cannot be specified multiple times")));
oldtablename = tt->name;
}
}
if (newtablename != NULL && oldtablename != NULL &&
strcmp(newtablename, oldtablename) == 0)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_OBJECT_DEFINITION),
errmsg("OLD TABLE name and NEW TABLE name cannot be the same")));
}
/*
* Parse the WHEN clause, if any
*/
if (stmt->whenClause)
{
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
ParseState *pstate;
RangeTblEntry *rte;
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
List *varList;
ListCell *lc;
/* Set up a pstate to parse with */
pstate = make_parsestate(NULL);
pstate->p_sourcetext = queryString;
/*
* Set up RTEs for OLD and NEW references.
*
* 'OLD' must always have varno equal to 1 and 'NEW' equal to 2.
*/
rte = addRangeTableEntryForRelation(pstate, rel,
makeAlias("old", NIL),
false, false);
addRTEtoQuery(pstate, rte, false, true, true);
rte = addRangeTableEntryForRelation(pstate, rel,
makeAlias("new", NIL),
false, false);
addRTEtoQuery(pstate, rte, false, true, true);
/* Transform expression. Copy to be sure we don't modify original */
whenClause = transformWhereClause(pstate,
copyObject(stmt->whenClause),
EXPR_KIND_TRIGGER_WHEN,
"WHEN");
/* we have to fix its collations too */
assign_expr_collations(pstate, whenClause);
/*
* Check for disallowed references to OLD/NEW.
*
* NB: pull_var_clause is okay here only because we don't allow
* subselects in WHEN clauses; it would fail to examine the contents
* of subselects.
*/
varList = pull_var_clause(whenClause, 0);
foreach(lc, varList)
{
Var *var = (Var *) lfirst(lc);
switch (var->varno)
{
case PRS2_OLD_VARNO:
if (!TRIGGER_FOR_ROW(tgtype))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_OBJECT_DEFINITION),
errmsg("statement trigger's WHEN condition cannot reference column values"),
parser_errposition(pstate, var->location)));
if (TRIGGER_FOR_INSERT(tgtype))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_OBJECT_DEFINITION),
errmsg("INSERT trigger's WHEN condition cannot reference OLD values"),
parser_errposition(pstate, var->location)));
/* system columns are okay here */
break;
case PRS2_NEW_VARNO:
if (!TRIGGER_FOR_ROW(tgtype))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_OBJECT_DEFINITION),
errmsg("statement trigger's WHEN condition cannot reference column values"),
parser_errposition(pstate, var->location)));
if (TRIGGER_FOR_DELETE(tgtype))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_OBJECT_DEFINITION),
errmsg("DELETE trigger's WHEN condition cannot reference NEW values"),
parser_errposition(pstate, var->location)));
if (var->varattno < 0 && TRIGGER_FOR_BEFORE(tgtype))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("BEFORE trigger's WHEN condition cannot reference NEW system columns"),
parser_errposition(pstate, var->location)));
break;
default:
/* can't happen without add_missing_from, so just elog */
elog(ERROR, "trigger WHEN condition cannot contain references to other relations");
break;
}
}
/* we'll need the rtable for recordDependencyOnExpr */
whenRtable = pstate->p_rtable;
qual = nodeToString(whenClause);
free_parsestate(pstate);
}
else
{
whenClause = NULL;
whenRtable = NIL;
qual = NULL;
}
/*
* Find and validate the trigger function.
*/
funcoid = LookupFuncName(stmt->funcname, 0, fargtypes, false);
if (!isInternal)
{
aclresult = pg_proc_aclcheck(funcoid, GetUserId(), ACL_EXECUTE);
if (aclresult != ACLCHECK_OK)
aclcheck_error(aclresult, ACL_KIND_PROC,
NameListToString(stmt->funcname));
}
funcrettype = get_func_rettype(funcoid);
if (funcrettype != TRIGGEROID)
{
/*
* We allow OPAQUE just so we can load old dump files. When we see a
* trigger function declared OPAQUE, change it to TRIGGER.
*/
if (funcrettype == OPAQUEOID)
{
ereport(WARNING,
(errmsg("changing return type of function %s from %s to %s",
NameListToString(stmt->funcname),
"opaque", "trigger")));
SetFunctionReturnType(funcoid, TRIGGEROID);
}
else
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_OBJECT_DEFINITION),
errmsg("function %s must return type %s",
NameListToString(stmt->funcname), "trigger")));
}
/*
* If the command is a user-entered CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER command that
* references one of the built-in RI_FKey trigger functions, assume it is
* from a dump of a pre-7.3 foreign key constraint, and take steps to
* convert this legacy representation into a regular foreign key
* constraint. Ugly, but necessary for loading old dump files.
*/
if (stmt->isconstraint && !isInternal &&
list_length(stmt->args) >= 6 &&
(list_length(stmt->args) % 2) == 0 &&
RI_FKey_trigger_type(funcoid) != RI_TRIGGER_NONE)
{
/* Keep lock on target rel until end of xact */
heap_close(rel, NoLock);
ConvertTriggerToFK(stmt, funcoid);
return InvalidObjectAddress;
}
/*
* If it's a user-entered CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER command, make a
* corresponding pg_constraint entry.
*/
if (stmt->isconstraint && !OidIsValid(constraintOid))
{
/* Internal callers should have made their own constraints */
Assert(!isInternal);
constraintOid = CreateConstraintEntry(stmt->trigname,
RelationGetNamespace(rel),
CONSTRAINT_TRIGGER,
stmt->deferrable,
stmt->initdeferred,
true,
RelationGetRelid(rel),
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
NULL, /* no conkey */
0,
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
InvalidOid, /* no domain */
InvalidOid, /* no index */
InvalidOid, /* no foreign key */
NULL,
NULL,
NULL,
NULL,
0,
' ',
' ',
' ',
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
NULL, /* no exclusion */
NULL, /* no check constraint */
NULL,
NULL,
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
true, /* islocal */
0, /* inhcount */
true, /* isnoinherit */
isInternal); /* is_internal */
}
/*
* Generate the trigger's OID now, so that we can use it in the name if
* needed.
*/
tgrel = heap_open(TriggerRelationId, RowExclusiveLock);
trigoid = GetNewOid(tgrel);
/*
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
* If trigger is internally generated, modify the provided trigger name to
* ensure uniqueness by appending the trigger OID. (Callers will usually
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
* supply a simple constant trigger name in these cases.)
*/
if (isInternal)
{
snprintf(internaltrigname, sizeof(internaltrigname),
"%s_%u", stmt->trigname, trigoid);
trigname = internaltrigname;
}
else
{
/* user-defined trigger; use the specified trigger name as-is */
trigname = stmt->trigname;
}
/*
* Scan pg_trigger for existing triggers on relation. We do this only to
* give a nice error message if there's already a trigger of the same
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
* name. (The unique index on tgrelid/tgname would complain anyway.) We
* can skip this for internally generated triggers, since the name
* modification above should be sufficient.
*
2016-06-10 00:02:36 +02:00
* NOTE that this is cool only because we have ShareRowExclusiveLock on
* the relation, so the trigger set won't be changing underneath us.
*/
if (!isInternal)
{
ScanKeyInit(&key,
Anum_pg_trigger_tgrelid,
BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_OIDEQ,
ObjectIdGetDatum(RelationGetRelid(rel)));
tgscan = systable_beginscan(tgrel, TriggerRelidNameIndexId, true,
NULL, 1, &key);
while (HeapTupleIsValid(tuple = systable_getnext(tgscan)))
{
Form_pg_trigger pg_trigger = (Form_pg_trigger) GETSTRUCT(tuple);
if (namestrcmp(&(pg_trigger->tgname), trigname) == 0)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_DUPLICATE_OBJECT),
errmsg("trigger \"%s\" for relation \"%s\" already exists",
trigname, RelationGetRelationName(rel))));
}
systable_endscan(tgscan);
}
/*
* Build the new pg_trigger tuple.
*/
memset(nulls, false, sizeof(nulls));
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgrelid - 1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(RelationGetRelid(rel));
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgname - 1] = DirectFunctionCall1(namein,
CStringGetDatum(trigname));
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgfoid - 1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(funcoid);
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgtype - 1] = Int16GetDatum(tgtype);
Changes pg_trigger and extend pg_rewrite in order to allow triggers and rules to be defined with different, per session controllable, behaviors for replication purposes. This will allow replication systems like Slony-I and, as has been stated on pgsql-hackers, other products to control the firing mechanism of triggers and rewrite rules without modifying the system catalog directly. The firing mechanisms are controlled by a new superuser-only GUC variable, session_replication_role, together with a change to pg_trigger.tgenabled and a new column pg_rewrite.ev_enabled. Both columns are a single char data type now (tgenabled was a bool before). The possible values in these attributes are: 'O' - Trigger/Rule fires when session_replication_role is "origin" (default) or "local". This is the default behavior. 'D' - Trigger/Rule is disabled and fires never 'A' - Trigger/Rule fires always regardless of the setting of session_replication_role 'R' - Trigger/Rule fires when session_replication_role is "replica" The GUC variable can only be changed as long as the system does not have any cached query plans. This will prevent changing the session role and accidentally executing stored procedures or functions that have plans cached that expand to the wrong query set due to differences in the rule firing semantics. The SQL syntax for changing a triggers/rules firing semantics is ALTER TABLE <tabname> <when> TRIGGER|RULE <name>; <when> ::= ENABLE | ENABLE ALWAYS | ENABLE REPLICA | DISABLE psql's \d command as well as pg_dump are extended in a backward compatible fashion. Jan
2007-03-20 00:38:32 +01:00
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgenabled - 1] = CharGetDatum(TRIGGER_FIRES_ON_ORIGIN);
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgisinternal - 1] = BoolGetDatum(isInternal);
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgconstrrelid - 1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(constrrelid);
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgconstrindid - 1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(indexOid);
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgconstraint - 1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(constraintOid);
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgdeferrable - 1] = BoolGetDatum(stmt->deferrable);
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tginitdeferred - 1] = BoolGetDatum(stmt->initdeferred);
if (stmt->args)
{
ListCell *le;
char *args;
int16 nargs = list_length(stmt->args);
int len = 0;
foreach(le, stmt->args)
{
char *ar = strVal(lfirst(le));
len += strlen(ar) + 4;
for (; *ar; ar++)
1997-10-02 15:52:29 +02:00
{
if (*ar == '\\')
len++;
}
}
args = (char *) palloc(len + 1);
args[0] = '\0';
foreach(le, stmt->args)
1997-10-02 15:52:29 +02:00
{
char *s = strVal(lfirst(le));
char *d = args + strlen(args);
1997-10-02 15:52:29 +02:00
while (*s)
{
if (*s == '\\')
*d++ = '\\';
*d++ = *s++;
}
strcpy(d, "\\000");
1997-10-02 15:52:29 +02:00
}
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgnargs - 1] = Int16GetDatum(nargs);
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgargs - 1] = DirectFunctionCall1(byteain,
CStringGetDatum(args));
}
else
{
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgnargs - 1] = Int16GetDatum(0);
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgargs - 1] = DirectFunctionCall1(byteain,
CStringGetDatum(""));
}
/* build column number array if it's a column-specific trigger */
ncolumns = list_length(stmt->columns);
if (ncolumns == 0)
columns = NULL;
else
{
ListCell *cell;
int i = 0;
columns = (int16 *) palloc(ncolumns * sizeof(int16));
foreach(cell, stmt->columns)
{
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
char *name = strVal(lfirst(cell));
int16 attnum;
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
int j;
/* Lookup column name. System columns are not allowed */
attnum = attnameAttNum(rel, name, false);
if (attnum == InvalidAttrNumber)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_COLUMN),
errmsg("column \"%s\" of relation \"%s\" does not exist",
name, RelationGetRelationName(rel))));
/* Check for duplicates */
for (j = i - 1; j >= 0; j--)
{
if (columns[j] == attnum)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_DUPLICATE_COLUMN),
errmsg("column \"%s\" specified more than once",
name)));
}
columns[i++] = attnum;
}
}
tgattr = buildint2vector(columns, ncolumns);
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgattr - 1] = PointerGetDatum(tgattr);
/* set tgqual if trigger has WHEN clause */
if (qual)
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgqual - 1] = CStringGetTextDatum(qual);
else
nulls[Anum_pg_trigger_tgqual - 1] = true;
if (oldtablename)
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgoldtable - 1] = DirectFunctionCall1(namein,
CStringGetDatum(oldtablename));
else
nulls[Anum_pg_trigger_tgoldtable - 1] = true;
if (newtablename)
values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgnewtable - 1] = DirectFunctionCall1(namein,
CStringGetDatum(newtablename));
else
nulls[Anum_pg_trigger_tgnewtable - 1] = true;
tuple = heap_form_tuple(tgrel->rd_att, values, nulls);
/* force tuple to have the desired OID */
HeapTupleSetOid(tuple, trigoid);
/*
* Insert tuple into pg_trigger.
*/
CatalogTupleInsert(tgrel, tuple);
heap_freetuple(tuple);
heap_close(tgrel, RowExclusiveLock);
pfree(DatumGetPointer(values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgname - 1]));
pfree(DatumGetPointer(values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgargs - 1]));
pfree(DatumGetPointer(values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgattr - 1]));
if (oldtablename)
pfree(DatumGetPointer(values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgoldtable - 1]));
if (newtablename)
pfree(DatumGetPointer(values[Anum_pg_trigger_tgnewtable - 1]));
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* Update relation's pg_class entry. Crucial side-effect: other backends
* (and this one too!) are sent SI message to make them rebuild relcache
* entries.
*/
pgrel = heap_open(RelationRelationId, RowExclusiveLock);
tuple = SearchSysCacheCopy1(RELOID,
ObjectIdGetDatum(RelationGetRelid(rel)));
if (!HeapTupleIsValid(tuple))
elog(ERROR, "cache lookup failed for relation %u",
RelationGetRelid(rel));
((Form_pg_class) GETSTRUCT(tuple))->relhastriggers = true;
CatalogTupleUpdate(pgrel, &tuple->t_self, tuple);
heap_freetuple(tuple);
heap_close(pgrel, RowExclusiveLock);
/*
* We used to try to update the rel's relcache entry here, but that's
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* fairly pointless since it will happen as a byproduct of the upcoming
* CommandCounterIncrement...
*/
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* Record dependencies for trigger. Always place a normal dependency on
* the function.
*/
myself.classId = TriggerRelationId;
myself.objectId = trigoid;
myself.objectSubId = 0;
referenced.classId = ProcedureRelationId;
referenced.objectId = funcoid;
referenced.objectSubId = 0;
recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL);
if (isInternal && OidIsValid(constraintOid))
{
/*
* Internally-generated trigger for a constraint, so make it an
* internal dependency of the constraint. We can skip depending on
* the relation(s), as there'll be an indirect dependency via the
* constraint.
*/
referenced.classId = ConstraintRelationId;
referenced.objectId = constraintOid;
referenced.objectSubId = 0;
recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL);
}
else
{
/*
* User CREATE TRIGGER, so place dependencies. We make trigger be
* auto-dropped if its relation is dropped or if the FK relation is
* dropped. (Auto drop is compatible with our pre-7.3 behavior.)
*/
referenced.classId = RelationRelationId;
referenced.objectId = RelationGetRelid(rel);
referenced.objectSubId = 0;
recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_AUTO);
if (OidIsValid(constrrelid))
{
referenced.classId = RelationRelationId;
referenced.objectId = constrrelid;
referenced.objectSubId = 0;
recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_AUTO);
}
/* Not possible to have an index dependency in this case */
Assert(!OidIsValid(indexOid));
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
/*
* If it's a user-specified constraint trigger, make the constraint
* internally dependent on the trigger instead of vice versa.
*/
if (OidIsValid(constraintOid))
{
referenced.classId = ConstraintRelationId;
referenced.objectId = constraintOid;
referenced.objectSubId = 0;
recordDependencyOn(&referenced, &myself, DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL);
}
}
/* If column-specific trigger, add normal dependencies on columns */
if (columns != NULL)
{
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
int i;
referenced.classId = RelationRelationId;
referenced.objectId = RelationGetRelid(rel);
for (i = 0; i < ncolumns; i++)
{
referenced.objectSubId = columns[i];
recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL);
}
}
/*
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
* If it has a WHEN clause, add dependencies on objects mentioned in the
* expression (eg, functions, as well as any columns used).
*/
if (whenClause != NULL)
recordDependencyOnExpr(&myself, whenClause, whenRtable,
DEPENDENCY_NORMAL);
/* Post creation hook for new trigger */
InvokeObjectPostCreateHookArg(TriggerRelationId, trigoid, 0,
isInternal);
/* Keep lock on target rel until end of xact */
heap_close(rel, NoLock);
return myself;
1997-08-31 13:40:13 +02:00
}
/*
* Convert legacy (pre-7.3) CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER commands into
* full-fledged foreign key constraints.
*
* The conversion is complex because a pre-7.3 foreign key involved three
* separate triggers, which were reported separately in dumps. While the
* single trigger on the referencing table adds no new information, we need
* to know the trigger functions of both of the triggers on the referenced
* table to build the constraint declaration. Also, due to lack of proper
* dependency checking pre-7.3, it is possible that the source database had
* an incomplete set of triggers resulting in an only partially enforced
* FK constraint. (This would happen if one of the tables had been dropped
* and re-created, but only if the DB had been affected by a 7.0 pg_dump bug
* that caused loss of tgconstrrelid information.) We choose to translate to
* an FK constraint only when we've seen all three triggers of a set. This is
* implemented by storing unmatched items in a list in TopMemoryContext.
* We match triggers together by comparing the trigger arguments (which
* include constraint name, table and column names, so should be good enough).
*/
typedef struct
{
List *args; /* list of (T_String) Values or NIL */
Oid funcoids[3]; /* OIDs of trigger functions */
/* The three function OIDs are stored in the order update, delete, child */
} OldTriggerInfo;
static void
ConvertTriggerToFK(CreateTrigStmt *stmt, Oid funcoid)
{
static List *info_list = NIL;
static const char *const funcdescr[3] = {
gettext_noop("Found referenced table's UPDATE trigger."),
gettext_noop("Found referenced table's DELETE trigger."),
gettext_noop("Found referencing table's trigger.")
};
char *constr_name;
char *fk_table_name;
char *pk_table_name;
char fk_matchtype = FKCONSTR_MATCH_SIMPLE;
List *fk_attrs = NIL;
List *pk_attrs = NIL;
StringInfoData buf;
int funcnum;
OldTriggerInfo *info = NULL;
ListCell *l;
int i;
/* Parse out the trigger arguments */
constr_name = strVal(linitial(stmt->args));
fk_table_name = strVal(lsecond(stmt->args));
pk_table_name = strVal(lthird(stmt->args));
i = 0;
foreach(l, stmt->args)
{
Value *arg = (Value *) lfirst(l);
i++;
if (i < 4) /* skip constraint and table names */
continue;
if (i == 4) /* handle match type */
{
if (strcmp(strVal(arg), "FULL") == 0)
fk_matchtype = FKCONSTR_MATCH_FULL;
else
fk_matchtype = FKCONSTR_MATCH_SIMPLE;
continue;
}
if (i % 2)
fk_attrs = lappend(fk_attrs, arg);
else
pk_attrs = lappend(pk_attrs, arg);
}
/* Prepare description of constraint for use in messages */
initStringInfo(&buf);
appendStringInfo(&buf, "FOREIGN KEY %s(",
quote_identifier(fk_table_name));
i = 0;
foreach(l, fk_attrs)
{
Value *arg = (Value *) lfirst(l);
if (i++ > 0)
appendStringInfoChar(&buf, ',');
appendStringInfoString(&buf, quote_identifier(strVal(arg)));
}
appendStringInfo(&buf, ") REFERENCES %s(",
quote_identifier(pk_table_name));
i = 0;
foreach(l, pk_attrs)
{
Value *arg = (Value *) lfirst(l);
if (i++ > 0)
appendStringInfoChar(&buf, ',');
appendStringInfoString(&buf, quote_identifier(strVal(arg)));
}
appendStringInfoChar(&buf, ')');
/* Identify class of trigger --- update, delete, or referencing-table */
switch (funcoid)
{
case F_RI_FKEY_CASCADE_UPD:
case F_RI_FKEY_RESTRICT_UPD:
case F_RI_FKEY_SETNULL_UPD:
case F_RI_FKEY_SETDEFAULT_UPD:
case F_RI_FKEY_NOACTION_UPD:
funcnum = 0;
break;
case F_RI_FKEY_CASCADE_DEL:
case F_RI_FKEY_RESTRICT_DEL:
case F_RI_FKEY_SETNULL_DEL:
case F_RI_FKEY_SETDEFAULT_DEL:
case F_RI_FKEY_NOACTION_DEL:
funcnum = 1;
break;
default:
funcnum = 2;
break;
}
/* See if we have a match to this trigger */
foreach(l, info_list)
{
info = (OldTriggerInfo *) lfirst(l);
if (info->funcoids[funcnum] == InvalidOid &&
equal(info->args, stmt->args))
{
info->funcoids[funcnum] = funcoid;
break;
}
}
if (l == NULL)
{
/* First trigger of set, so create a new list entry */
MemoryContext oldContext;
ereport(NOTICE,
(errmsg("ignoring incomplete trigger group for constraint \"%s\" %s",
constr_name, buf.data),
errdetail_internal("%s", _(funcdescr[funcnum]))));
oldContext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(TopMemoryContext);
info = (OldTriggerInfo *) palloc0(sizeof(OldTriggerInfo));
info->args = copyObject(stmt->args);
info->funcoids[funcnum] = funcoid;
info_list = lappend(info_list, info);
MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldContext);
}
else if (info->funcoids[0] == InvalidOid ||
info->funcoids[1] == InvalidOid ||
info->funcoids[2] == InvalidOid)
{
/* Second trigger of set */
ereport(NOTICE,
(errmsg("ignoring incomplete trigger group for constraint \"%s\" %s",
constr_name, buf.data),
errdetail_internal("%s", _(funcdescr[funcnum]))));
}
else
{
/* OK, we have a set, so make the FK constraint ALTER TABLE cmd */
AlterTableStmt *atstmt = makeNode(AlterTableStmt);
AlterTableCmd *atcmd = makeNode(AlterTableCmd);
Constraint *fkcon = makeNode(Constraint);
Change representation of statement lists, and add statement location info. This patch makes several changes that improve the consistency of representation of lists of statements. It's always been the case that the output of parse analysis is a list of Query nodes, whatever the types of the individual statements in the list. This patch brings similar consistency to the outputs of raw parsing and planning steps: * The output of raw parsing is now always a list of RawStmt nodes; the statement-type-dependent nodes are one level down from that. * The output of pg_plan_queries() is now always a list of PlannedStmt nodes, even for utility statements. In the case of a utility statement, "planning" just consists of wrapping a CMD_UTILITY PlannedStmt around the utility node. This list representation is now used in Portal and CachedPlan plan lists, replacing the former convention of intermixing PlannedStmts with bare utility-statement nodes. Now, every list of statements has a consistent head-node type depending on how far along it is in processing. This allows changing many places that formerly used generic "Node *" pointers to use a more specific pointer type, thus reducing the number of IsA() tests and casts needed, as well as improving code clarity. Also, the post-parse-analysis representation of DECLARE CURSOR is changed so that it looks more like EXPLAIN, PREPARE, etc. That is, the contained SELECT remains a child of the DeclareCursorStmt rather than getting flipped around to be the other way. It's now true for both Query and PlannedStmt that utilityStmt is non-null if and only if commandType is CMD_UTILITY. That allows simplifying a lot of places that were testing both fields. (I think some of those were just defensive programming, but in many places, it was actually necessary to avoid confusing DECLARE CURSOR with SELECT.) Because PlannedStmt carries a canSetTag field, we're also able to get rid of some ad-hoc rules about how to reconstruct canSetTag for a bare utility statement; specifically, the assumption that a utility is canSetTag if and only if it's the only one in its list. While I see no near-term need for relaxing that restriction, it's nice to get rid of the ad-hocery. The API of ProcessUtility() is changed so that what it's passed is the wrapper PlannedStmt not just the bare utility statement. This will affect all users of ProcessUtility_hook, but the changes are pretty trivial; see the affected contrib modules for examples of the minimum change needed. (Most compilers should give pointer-type-mismatch warnings for uncorrected code.) There's also a change in the API of ExplainOneQuery_hook, to pass through cursorOptions instead of expecting hook functions to know what to pick. This is needed because of the DECLARE CURSOR changes, but really should have been done in 9.6; it's unlikely that any extant hook functions know about using CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK. Finally, teach gram.y to save statement boundary locations in RawStmt nodes, and pass those through to Query and PlannedStmt nodes. This allows more intelligent handling of cases where a source query string contains multiple statements. This patch doesn't actually do anything with the information, but a follow-on patch will. (Passing this information through cleanly is the true motivation for these changes; while I think this is all good cleanup, it's unlikely we'd have bothered without this end goal.) catversion bump because addition of location fields to struct Query affects stored rules. This patch is by me, but it owes a good deal to Fabien Coelho who did a lot of preliminary work on the problem, and also reviewed the patch. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/alpine.DEB.2.20.1612200926310.29821@lancre
2017-01-14 22:02:35 +01:00
PlannedStmt *wrapper = makeNode(PlannedStmt);
ereport(NOTICE,
(errmsg("converting trigger group into constraint \"%s\" %s",
constr_name, buf.data),
errdetail_internal("%s", _(funcdescr[funcnum]))));
fkcon->contype = CONSTR_FOREIGN;
fkcon->location = -1;
if (funcnum == 2)
{
/* This trigger is on the FK table */
atstmt->relation = stmt->relation;
if (stmt->constrrel)
fkcon->pktable = stmt->constrrel;
else
{
/* Work around ancient pg_dump bug that omitted constrrel */
fkcon->pktable = makeRangeVar(NULL, pk_table_name, -1);
}
}
else
{
/* This trigger is on the PK table */
fkcon->pktable = stmt->relation;
if (stmt->constrrel)
atstmt->relation = stmt->constrrel;
else
{
/* Work around ancient pg_dump bug that omitted constrrel */
atstmt->relation = makeRangeVar(NULL, fk_table_name, -1);
}
}
atstmt->cmds = list_make1(atcmd);
atstmt->relkind = OBJECT_TABLE;
atcmd->subtype = AT_AddConstraint;
atcmd->def = (Node *) fkcon;
if (strcmp(constr_name, "<unnamed>") == 0)
fkcon->conname = NULL;
else
fkcon->conname = constr_name;
fkcon->fk_attrs = fk_attrs;
fkcon->pk_attrs = pk_attrs;
fkcon->fk_matchtype = fk_matchtype;
switch (info->funcoids[0])
{
case F_RI_FKEY_NOACTION_UPD:
fkcon->fk_upd_action = FKCONSTR_ACTION_NOACTION;
break;
case F_RI_FKEY_CASCADE_UPD:
fkcon->fk_upd_action = FKCONSTR_ACTION_CASCADE;
break;
case F_RI_FKEY_RESTRICT_UPD:
fkcon->fk_upd_action = FKCONSTR_ACTION_RESTRICT;
break;
case F_RI_FKEY_SETNULL_UPD:
fkcon->fk_upd_action = FKCONSTR_ACTION_SETNULL;
break;
case F_RI_FKEY_SETDEFAULT_UPD:
fkcon->fk_upd_action = FKCONSTR_ACTION_SETDEFAULT;
break;
default:
/* can't get here because of earlier checks */
elog(ERROR, "confused about RI update function");
}
switch (info->funcoids[1])
{
case F_RI_FKEY_NOACTION_DEL:
fkcon->fk_del_action = FKCONSTR_ACTION_NOACTION;
break;
case F_RI_FKEY_CASCADE_DEL:
fkcon->fk_del_action = FKCONSTR_ACTION_CASCADE;
break;
case F_RI_FKEY_RESTRICT_DEL:
fkcon->fk_del_action = FKCONSTR_ACTION_RESTRICT;
break;
case F_RI_FKEY_SETNULL_DEL:
fkcon->fk_del_action = FKCONSTR_ACTION_SETNULL;
break;
case F_RI_FKEY_SETDEFAULT_DEL:
fkcon->fk_del_action = FKCONSTR_ACTION_SETDEFAULT;
break;
default:
/* can't get here because of earlier checks */
elog(ERROR, "confused about RI delete function");
}
fkcon->deferrable = stmt->deferrable;
fkcon->initdeferred = stmt->initdeferred;
fkcon->skip_validation = false;
fkcon->initially_valid = true;
Change representation of statement lists, and add statement location info. This patch makes several changes that improve the consistency of representation of lists of statements. It's always been the case that the output of parse analysis is a list of Query nodes, whatever the types of the individual statements in the list. This patch brings similar consistency to the outputs of raw parsing and planning steps: * The output of raw parsing is now always a list of RawStmt nodes; the statement-type-dependent nodes are one level down from that. * The output of pg_plan_queries() is now always a list of PlannedStmt nodes, even for utility statements. In the case of a utility statement, "planning" just consists of wrapping a CMD_UTILITY PlannedStmt around the utility node. This list representation is now used in Portal and CachedPlan plan lists, replacing the former convention of intermixing PlannedStmts with bare utility-statement nodes. Now, every list of statements has a consistent head-node type depending on how far along it is in processing. This allows changing many places that formerly used generic "Node *" pointers to use a more specific pointer type, thus reducing the number of IsA() tests and casts needed, as well as improving code clarity. Also, the post-parse-analysis representation of DECLARE CURSOR is changed so that it looks more like EXPLAIN, PREPARE, etc. That is, the contained SELECT remains a child of the DeclareCursorStmt rather than getting flipped around to be the other way. It's now true for both Query and PlannedStmt that utilityStmt is non-null if and only if commandType is CMD_UTILITY. That allows simplifying a lot of places that were testing both fields. (I think some of those were just defensive programming, but in many places, it was actually necessary to avoid confusing DECLARE CURSOR with SELECT.) Because PlannedStmt carries a canSetTag field, we're also able to get rid of some ad-hoc rules about how to reconstruct canSetTag for a bare utility statement; specifically, the assumption that a utility is canSetTag if and only if it's the only one in its list. While I see no near-term need for relaxing that restriction, it's nice to get rid of the ad-hocery. The API of ProcessUtility() is changed so that what it's passed is the wrapper PlannedStmt not just the bare utility statement. This will affect all users of ProcessUtility_hook, but the changes are pretty trivial; see the affected contrib modules for examples of the minimum change needed. (Most compilers should give pointer-type-mismatch warnings for uncorrected code.) There's also a change in the API of ExplainOneQuery_hook, to pass through cursorOptions instead of expecting hook functions to know what to pick. This is needed because of the DECLARE CURSOR changes, but really should have been done in 9.6; it's unlikely that any extant hook functions know about using CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK. Finally, teach gram.y to save statement boundary locations in RawStmt nodes, and pass those through to Query and PlannedStmt nodes. This allows more intelligent handling of cases where a source query string contains multiple statements. This patch doesn't actually do anything with the information, but a follow-on patch will. (Passing this information through cleanly is the true motivation for these changes; while I think this is all good cleanup, it's unlikely we'd have bothered without this end goal.) catversion bump because addition of location fields to struct Query affects stored rules. This patch is by me, but it owes a good deal to Fabien Coelho who did a lot of preliminary work on the problem, and also reviewed the patch. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/alpine.DEB.2.20.1612200926310.29821@lancre
2017-01-14 22:02:35 +01:00
/* finally, wrap it in a dummy PlannedStmt */
wrapper->commandType = CMD_UTILITY;
wrapper->canSetTag = false;
wrapper->utilityStmt = (Node *) atstmt;
wrapper->stmt_location = -1;
wrapper->stmt_len = -1;
/* ... and execute it */
Change representation of statement lists, and add statement location info. This patch makes several changes that improve the consistency of representation of lists of statements. It's always been the case that the output of parse analysis is a list of Query nodes, whatever the types of the individual statements in the list. This patch brings similar consistency to the outputs of raw parsing and planning steps: * The output of raw parsing is now always a list of RawStmt nodes; the statement-type-dependent nodes are one level down from that. * The output of pg_plan_queries() is now always a list of PlannedStmt nodes, even for utility statements. In the case of a utility statement, "planning" just consists of wrapping a CMD_UTILITY PlannedStmt around the utility node. This list representation is now used in Portal and CachedPlan plan lists, replacing the former convention of intermixing PlannedStmts with bare utility-statement nodes. Now, every list of statements has a consistent head-node type depending on how far along it is in processing. This allows changing many places that formerly used generic "Node *" pointers to use a more specific pointer type, thus reducing the number of IsA() tests and casts needed, as well as improving code clarity. Also, the post-parse-analysis representation of DECLARE CURSOR is changed so that it looks more like EXPLAIN, PREPARE, etc. That is, the contained SELECT remains a child of the DeclareCursorStmt rather than getting flipped around to be the other way. It's now true for both Query and PlannedStmt that utilityStmt is non-null if and only if commandType is CMD_UTILITY. That allows simplifying a lot of places that were testing both fields. (I think some of those were just defensive programming, but in many places, it was actually necessary to avoid confusing DECLARE CURSOR with SELECT.) Because PlannedStmt carries a canSetTag field, we're also able to get rid of some ad-hoc rules about how to reconstruct canSetTag for a bare utility statement; specifically, the assumption that a utility is canSetTag if and only if it's the only one in its list. While I see no near-term need for relaxing that restriction, it's nice to get rid of the ad-hocery. The API of ProcessUtility() is changed so that what it's passed is the wrapper PlannedStmt not just the bare utility statement. This will affect all users of ProcessUtility_hook, but the changes are pretty trivial; see the affected contrib modules for examples of the minimum change needed. (Most compilers should give pointer-type-mismatch warnings for uncorrected code.) There's also a change in the API of ExplainOneQuery_hook, to pass through cursorOptions instead of expecting hook functions to know what to pick. This is needed because of the DECLARE CURSOR changes, but really should have been done in 9.6; it's unlikely that any extant hook functions know about using CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK. Finally, teach gram.y to save statement boundary locations in RawStmt nodes, and pass those through to Query and PlannedStmt nodes. This allows more intelligent handling of cases where a source query string contains multiple statements. This patch doesn't actually do anything with the information, but a follow-on patch will. (Passing this information through cleanly is the true motivation for these changes; while I think this is all good cleanup, it's unlikely we'd have bothered without this end goal.) catversion bump because addition of location fields to struct Query affects stored rules. This patch is by me, but it owes a good deal to Fabien Coelho who did a lot of preliminary work on the problem, and also reviewed the patch. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/alpine.DEB.2.20.1612200926310.29821@lancre
2017-01-14 22:02:35 +01:00
ProcessUtility(wrapper,
"(generated ALTER TABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY command)",
PROCESS_UTILITY_SUBCOMMAND, NULL, NULL,
None_Receiver, NULL);
/* Remove the matched item from the list */
info_list = list_delete_ptr(info_list, info);
pfree(info);
/* We leak the copied args ... not worth worrying about */
}
}
/*
* Guts of trigger deletion.
*/
void
RemoveTriggerById(Oid trigOid)
1997-08-31 13:40:13 +02:00
{
Relation tgrel;
2002-09-04 22:31:48 +02:00
SysScanDesc tgscan;
ScanKeyData skey[1];
HeapTuple tup;
Oid relid;
Relation rel;
tgrel = heap_open(TriggerRelationId, RowExclusiveLock);
/*
* Find the trigger to delete.
*/
ScanKeyInit(&skey[0],
ObjectIdAttributeNumber,
BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_OIDEQ,
ObjectIdGetDatum(trigOid));
tgscan = systable_beginscan(tgrel, TriggerOidIndexId, true,
NULL, 1, skey);
tup = systable_getnext(tgscan);
if (!HeapTupleIsValid(tup))
elog(ERROR, "could not find tuple for trigger %u", trigOid);
/*
* Open and exclusive-lock the relation the trigger belongs to.
*/
relid = ((Form_pg_trigger) GETSTRUCT(tup))->tgrelid;
rel = heap_open(relid, AccessExclusiveLock);
if (rel->rd_rel->relkind != RELKIND_RELATION &&
rel->rd_rel->relkind != RELKIND_VIEW &&
Implement table partitioning. Table partitioning is like table inheritance and reuses much of the existing infrastructure, but there are some important differences. The parent is called a partitioned table and is always empty; it may not have indexes or non-inherited constraints, since those make no sense for a relation with no data of its own. The children are called partitions and contain all of the actual data. Each partition has an implicit partitioning constraint. Multiple inheritance is not allowed, and partitioning and inheritance can't be mixed. Partitions can't have extra columns and may not allow nulls unless the parent does. Tuples inserted into the parent are automatically routed to the correct partition, so tuple-routing ON INSERT triggers are not needed. Tuple routing isn't yet supported for partitions which are foreign tables, and it doesn't handle updates that cross partition boundaries. Currently, tables can be range-partitioned or list-partitioned. List partitioning is limited to a single column, but range partitioning can involve multiple columns. A partitioning "column" can be an expression. Because table partitioning is less general than table inheritance, it is hoped that it will be easier to reason about properties of partitions, and therefore that this will serve as a better foundation for a variety of possible optimizations, including query planner optimizations. The tuple routing based which this patch does based on the implicit partitioning constraints is an example of this, but it seems likely that many other useful optimizations are also possible. Amit Langote, reviewed and tested by Robert Haas, Ashutosh Bapat, Amit Kapila, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi, Corey Huinker, Jaime Casanova, Rushabh Lathia, Erik Rijkers, among others. Minor revisions by me.
2016-12-07 19:17:43 +01:00
rel->rd_rel->relkind != RELKIND_FOREIGN_TABLE &&
rel->rd_rel->relkind != RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE),
errmsg("\"%s\" is not a table, view, or foreign table",
RelationGetRelationName(rel))));
if (!allowSystemTableMods && IsSystemRelation(rel))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
errmsg("permission denied: \"%s\" is a system catalog",
RelationGetRelationName(rel))));
/*
* Delete the pg_trigger tuple.
*/
CatalogTupleDelete(tgrel, &tup->t_self);
systable_endscan(tgscan);
heap_close(tgrel, RowExclusiveLock);
/*
* We do not bother to try to determine whether any other triggers remain,
* which would be needed in order to decide whether it's safe to clear the
* relation's relhastriggers. (In any case, there might be a concurrent
* process adding new triggers.) Instead, just force a relcache inval to
* make other backends (and this one too!) rebuild their relcache entries.
* There's no great harm in leaving relhastriggers true even if there are
* no triggers left.
*/
CacheInvalidateRelcache(rel);
/* Keep lock on trigger's rel until end of xact */
heap_close(rel, NoLock);
1997-08-31 13:40:13 +02:00
}
/*
* get_trigger_oid - Look up a trigger by name to find its OID.
*
* If missing_ok is false, throw an error if trigger not found. If
* true, just return InvalidOid.
*/
Oid
get_trigger_oid(Oid relid, const char *trigname, bool missing_ok)
{
Relation tgrel;
ScanKeyData skey[2];
SysScanDesc tgscan;
HeapTuple tup;
Oid oid;
/*
* Find the trigger, verify permissions, set up object address
*/
tgrel = heap_open(TriggerRelationId, AccessShareLock);
ScanKeyInit(&skey[0],
Anum_pg_trigger_tgrelid,
BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_OIDEQ,
ObjectIdGetDatum(relid));
ScanKeyInit(&skey[1],
Anum_pg_trigger_tgname,
BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_NAMEEQ,
CStringGetDatum(trigname));
tgscan = systable_beginscan(tgrel, TriggerRelidNameIndexId, true,
NULL, 2, skey);
tup = systable_getnext(tgscan);
if (!HeapTupleIsValid(tup))
{
if (!missing_ok)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_OBJECT),
errmsg("trigger \"%s\" for table \"%s\" does not exist",
trigname, get_rel_name(relid))));
oid = InvalidOid;
}
else
{
oid = HeapTupleGetOid(tup);
}
systable_endscan(tgscan);
heap_close(tgrel, AccessShareLock);
return oid;
}
/*
* Perform permissions and integrity checks before acquiring a relation lock.
*/
static void
RangeVarCallbackForRenameTrigger(const RangeVar *rv, Oid relid, Oid oldrelid,
void *arg)
{
HeapTuple tuple;
Form_pg_class form;
tuple = SearchSysCache1(RELOID, ObjectIdGetDatum(relid));
if (!HeapTupleIsValid(tuple))
return; /* concurrently dropped */
form = (Form_pg_class) GETSTRUCT(tuple);
/* only tables and views can have triggers */
if (form->relkind != RELKIND_RELATION && form->relkind != RELKIND_VIEW &&
Implement table partitioning. Table partitioning is like table inheritance and reuses much of the existing infrastructure, but there are some important differences. The parent is called a partitioned table and is always empty; it may not have indexes or non-inherited constraints, since those make no sense for a relation with no data of its own. The children are called partitions and contain all of the actual data. Each partition has an implicit partitioning constraint. Multiple inheritance is not allowed, and partitioning and inheritance can't be mixed. Partitions can't have extra columns and may not allow nulls unless the parent does. Tuples inserted into the parent are automatically routed to the correct partition, so tuple-routing ON INSERT triggers are not needed. Tuple routing isn't yet supported for partitions which are foreign tables, and it doesn't handle updates that cross partition boundaries. Currently, tables can be range-partitioned or list-partitioned. List partitioning is limited to a single column, but range partitioning can involve multiple columns. A partitioning "column" can be an expression. Because table partitioning is less general than table inheritance, it is hoped that it will be easier to reason about properties of partitions, and therefore that this will serve as a better foundation for a variety of possible optimizations, including query planner optimizations. The tuple routing based which this patch does based on the implicit partitioning constraints is an example of this, but it seems likely that many other useful optimizations are also possible. Amit Langote, reviewed and tested by Robert Haas, Ashutosh Bapat, Amit Kapila, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi, Corey Huinker, Jaime Casanova, Rushabh Lathia, Erik Rijkers, among others. Minor revisions by me.
2016-12-07 19:17:43 +01:00
form->relkind != RELKIND_FOREIGN_TABLE &&
form->relkind != RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE),
errmsg("\"%s\" is not a table, view, or foreign table",
rv->relname)));
/* you must own the table to rename one of its triggers */
if (!pg_class_ownercheck(relid, GetUserId()))
aclcheck_error(ACLCHECK_NOT_OWNER, ACL_KIND_CLASS, rv->relname);
if (!allowSystemTableMods && IsSystemClass(relid, form))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
errmsg("permission denied: \"%s\" is a system catalog",
rv->relname)));
ReleaseSysCache(tuple);
}
/*
* renametrig - changes the name of a trigger on a relation
*
* trigger name is changed in trigger catalog.
* No record of the previous name is kept.
*
* get proper relrelation from relation catalog (if not arg)
* scan trigger catalog
* for name conflict (within rel)
* for original trigger (if not arg)
* modify tgname in trigger tuple
* update row in catalog
*/
ObjectAddress
renametrig(RenameStmt *stmt)
{
Oid tgoid;
Relation targetrel;
Relation tgrel;
HeapTuple tuple;
2002-09-04 22:31:48 +02:00
SysScanDesc tgscan;
ScanKeyData key[2];
Oid relid;
ObjectAddress address;
/*
* Look up name, check permissions, and acquire lock (which we will NOT
* release until end of transaction).
*/
relid = RangeVarGetRelidExtended(stmt->relation, AccessExclusiveLock,
false, false,
RangeVarCallbackForRenameTrigger,
NULL);
/* Have lock already, so just need to build relcache entry. */
targetrel = relation_open(relid, NoLock);
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* Scan pg_trigger twice for existing triggers on relation. We do this in
* order to ensure a trigger does not exist with newname (The unique index
* on tgrelid/tgname would complain anyway) and to ensure a trigger does
* exist with oldname.
*
* NOTE that this is cool only because we have AccessExclusiveLock on the
* relation, so the trigger set won't be changing underneath us.
*/
tgrel = heap_open(TriggerRelationId, RowExclusiveLock);
/*
* First pass -- look for name conflict
*/
ScanKeyInit(&key[0],
Anum_pg_trigger_tgrelid,
BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_OIDEQ,
ObjectIdGetDatum(relid));
ScanKeyInit(&key[1],
Anum_pg_trigger_tgname,
BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_NAMEEQ,
PointerGetDatum(stmt->newname));
tgscan = systable_beginscan(tgrel, TriggerRelidNameIndexId, true,
NULL, 2, key);
if (HeapTupleIsValid(tuple = systable_getnext(tgscan)))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_DUPLICATE_OBJECT),
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
errmsg("trigger \"%s\" for relation \"%s\" already exists",
stmt->newname, RelationGetRelationName(targetrel))));
systable_endscan(tgscan);
/*
* Second pass -- look for trigger existing with oldname and update
*/
ScanKeyInit(&key[0],
Anum_pg_trigger_tgrelid,
BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_OIDEQ,
ObjectIdGetDatum(relid));
ScanKeyInit(&key[1],
Anum_pg_trigger_tgname,
BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_NAMEEQ,
PointerGetDatum(stmt->subname));
tgscan = systable_beginscan(tgrel, TriggerRelidNameIndexId, true,
NULL, 2, key);
if (HeapTupleIsValid(tuple = systable_getnext(tgscan)))
{
tgoid = HeapTupleGetOid(tuple);
/*
* Update pg_trigger tuple with new tgname.
*/
2002-09-04 22:31:48 +02:00
tuple = heap_copytuple(tuple); /* need a modifiable copy */
namestrcpy(&((Form_pg_trigger) GETSTRUCT(tuple))->tgname,
stmt->newname);
CatalogTupleUpdate(tgrel, &tuple->t_self, tuple);
InvokeObjectPostAlterHook(TriggerRelationId,
HeapTupleGetOid(tuple), 0);
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* Invalidate relation's relcache entry so that other backends (and
* this one too!) are sent SI message to make them rebuild relcache
* entries. (Ideally this should happen automatically...)
*/
CacheInvalidateRelcache(targetrel);
}
else
{
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_OBJECT),
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
errmsg("trigger \"%s\" for table \"%s\" does not exist",
stmt->subname, RelationGetRelationName(targetrel))));
}
ObjectAddressSet(address, TriggerRelationId, tgoid);
systable_endscan(tgscan);
heap_close(tgrel, RowExclusiveLock);
/*
* Close rel, but keep exclusive lock!
*/
relation_close(targetrel, NoLock);
return address;
}
/*
* EnableDisableTrigger()
*
* Called by ALTER TABLE ENABLE/DISABLE [ REPLICA | ALWAYS ] TRIGGER
Changes pg_trigger and extend pg_rewrite in order to allow triggers and rules to be defined with different, per session controllable, behaviors for replication purposes. This will allow replication systems like Slony-I and, as has been stated on pgsql-hackers, other products to control the firing mechanism of triggers and rewrite rules without modifying the system catalog directly. The firing mechanisms are controlled by a new superuser-only GUC variable, session_replication_role, together with a change to pg_trigger.tgenabled and a new column pg_rewrite.ev_enabled. Both columns are a single char data type now (tgenabled was a bool before). The possible values in these attributes are: 'O' - Trigger/Rule fires when session_replication_role is "origin" (default) or "local". This is the default behavior. 'D' - Trigger/Rule is disabled and fires never 'A' - Trigger/Rule fires always regardless of the setting of session_replication_role 'R' - Trigger/Rule fires when session_replication_role is "replica" The GUC variable can only be changed as long as the system does not have any cached query plans. This will prevent changing the session role and accidentally executing stored procedures or functions that have plans cached that expand to the wrong query set due to differences in the rule firing semantics. The SQL syntax for changing a triggers/rules firing semantics is ALTER TABLE <tabname> <when> TRIGGER|RULE <name>; <when> ::= ENABLE | ENABLE ALWAYS | ENABLE REPLICA | DISABLE psql's \d command as well as pg_dump are extended in a backward compatible fashion. Jan
2007-03-20 00:38:32 +01:00
* to change 'tgenabled' field for the specified trigger(s)
*
* rel: relation to process (caller must hold suitable lock on it)
* tgname: trigger to process, or NULL to scan all triggers
* fires_when: new value for tgenabled field. In addition to generic
* enablement/disablement, this also defines when the trigger
* should be fired in session replication roles.
* skip_system: if true, skip "system" triggers (constraint triggers)
*
* Caller should have checked permissions for the table; here we also
* enforce that superuser privilege is required to alter the state of
* system triggers
*/
void
EnableDisableTrigger(Relation rel, const char *tgname,
Changes pg_trigger and extend pg_rewrite in order to allow triggers and rules to be defined with different, per session controllable, behaviors for replication purposes. This will allow replication systems like Slony-I and, as has been stated on pgsql-hackers, other products to control the firing mechanism of triggers and rewrite rules without modifying the system catalog directly. The firing mechanisms are controlled by a new superuser-only GUC variable, session_replication_role, together with a change to pg_trigger.tgenabled and a new column pg_rewrite.ev_enabled. Both columns are a single char data type now (tgenabled was a bool before). The possible values in these attributes are: 'O' - Trigger/Rule fires when session_replication_role is "origin" (default) or "local". This is the default behavior. 'D' - Trigger/Rule is disabled and fires never 'A' - Trigger/Rule fires always regardless of the setting of session_replication_role 'R' - Trigger/Rule fires when session_replication_role is "replica" The GUC variable can only be changed as long as the system does not have any cached query plans. This will prevent changing the session role and accidentally executing stored procedures or functions that have plans cached that expand to the wrong query set due to differences in the rule firing semantics. The SQL syntax for changing a triggers/rules firing semantics is ALTER TABLE <tabname> <when> TRIGGER|RULE <name>; <when> ::= ENABLE | ENABLE ALWAYS | ENABLE REPLICA | DISABLE psql's \d command as well as pg_dump are extended in a backward compatible fashion. Jan
2007-03-20 00:38:32 +01:00
char fires_when, bool skip_system)
{
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
Relation tgrel;
int nkeys;
ScanKeyData keys[2];
SysScanDesc tgscan;
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
HeapTuple tuple;
bool found;
bool changed;
/* Scan the relevant entries in pg_triggers */
tgrel = heap_open(TriggerRelationId, RowExclusiveLock);
ScanKeyInit(&keys[0],
Anum_pg_trigger_tgrelid,
BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_OIDEQ,
ObjectIdGetDatum(RelationGetRelid(rel)));
if (tgname)
{
ScanKeyInit(&keys[1],
Anum_pg_trigger_tgname,
BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_NAMEEQ,
CStringGetDatum(tgname));
nkeys = 2;
}
else
nkeys = 1;
tgscan = systable_beginscan(tgrel, TriggerRelidNameIndexId, true,
NULL, nkeys, keys);
found = changed = false;
while (HeapTupleIsValid(tuple = systable_getnext(tgscan)))
{
Form_pg_trigger oldtrig = (Form_pg_trigger) GETSTRUCT(tuple);
if (oldtrig->tgisinternal)
{
/* system trigger ... ok to process? */
if (skip_system)
continue;
if (!superuser())
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
errmsg("permission denied: \"%s\" is a system trigger",
NameStr(oldtrig->tgname))));
}
found = true;
Changes pg_trigger and extend pg_rewrite in order to allow triggers and rules to be defined with different, per session controllable, behaviors for replication purposes. This will allow replication systems like Slony-I and, as has been stated on pgsql-hackers, other products to control the firing mechanism of triggers and rewrite rules without modifying the system catalog directly. The firing mechanisms are controlled by a new superuser-only GUC variable, session_replication_role, together with a change to pg_trigger.tgenabled and a new column pg_rewrite.ev_enabled. Both columns are a single char data type now (tgenabled was a bool before). The possible values in these attributes are: 'O' - Trigger/Rule fires when session_replication_role is "origin" (default) or "local". This is the default behavior. 'D' - Trigger/Rule is disabled and fires never 'A' - Trigger/Rule fires always regardless of the setting of session_replication_role 'R' - Trigger/Rule fires when session_replication_role is "replica" The GUC variable can only be changed as long as the system does not have any cached query plans. This will prevent changing the session role and accidentally executing stored procedures or functions that have plans cached that expand to the wrong query set due to differences in the rule firing semantics. The SQL syntax for changing a triggers/rules firing semantics is ALTER TABLE <tabname> <when> TRIGGER|RULE <name>; <when> ::= ENABLE | ENABLE ALWAYS | ENABLE REPLICA | DISABLE psql's \d command as well as pg_dump are extended in a backward compatible fashion. Jan
2007-03-20 00:38:32 +01:00
if (oldtrig->tgenabled != fires_when)
{
/* need to change this one ... make a copy to scribble on */
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
HeapTuple newtup = heap_copytuple(tuple);
Form_pg_trigger newtrig = (Form_pg_trigger) GETSTRUCT(newtup);
Changes pg_trigger and extend pg_rewrite in order to allow triggers and rules to be defined with different, per session controllable, behaviors for replication purposes. This will allow replication systems like Slony-I and, as has been stated on pgsql-hackers, other products to control the firing mechanism of triggers and rewrite rules without modifying the system catalog directly. The firing mechanisms are controlled by a new superuser-only GUC variable, session_replication_role, together with a change to pg_trigger.tgenabled and a new column pg_rewrite.ev_enabled. Both columns are a single char data type now (tgenabled was a bool before). The possible values in these attributes are: 'O' - Trigger/Rule fires when session_replication_role is "origin" (default) or "local". This is the default behavior. 'D' - Trigger/Rule is disabled and fires never 'A' - Trigger/Rule fires always regardless of the setting of session_replication_role 'R' - Trigger/Rule fires when session_replication_role is "replica" The GUC variable can only be changed as long as the system does not have any cached query plans. This will prevent changing the session role and accidentally executing stored procedures or functions that have plans cached that expand to the wrong query set due to differences in the rule firing semantics. The SQL syntax for changing a triggers/rules firing semantics is ALTER TABLE <tabname> <when> TRIGGER|RULE <name>; <when> ::= ENABLE | ENABLE ALWAYS | ENABLE REPLICA | DISABLE psql's \d command as well as pg_dump are extended in a backward compatible fashion. Jan
2007-03-20 00:38:32 +01:00
newtrig->tgenabled = fires_when;
CatalogTupleUpdate(tgrel, &newtup->t_self, newtup);
heap_freetuple(newtup);
changed = true;
}
InvokeObjectPostAlterHook(TriggerRelationId,
HeapTupleGetOid(tuple), 0);
}
systable_endscan(tgscan);
heap_close(tgrel, RowExclusiveLock);
if (tgname && !found)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_OBJECT),
errmsg("trigger \"%s\" for table \"%s\" does not exist",
tgname, RelationGetRelationName(rel))));
/*
* If we changed anything, broadcast a SI inval message to force each
* backend (including our own!) to rebuild relation's relcache entry.
* Otherwise they will fail to apply the change promptly.
*/
if (changed)
CacheInvalidateRelcache(rel);
}
/*
* Build trigger data to attach to the given relcache entry.
*
* Note that trigger data attached to a relcache entry must be stored in
* CacheMemoryContext to ensure it survives as long as the relcache entry.
* But we should be running in a less long-lived working context. To avoid
* leaking cache memory if this routine fails partway through, we build a
* temporary TriggerDesc in working memory and then copy the completed
* structure into cache memory.
*/
void
RelationBuildTriggers(Relation relation)
{
TriggerDesc *trigdesc;
int numtrigs;
int maxtrigs;
Trigger *triggers;
Relation tgrel;
ScanKeyData skey;
2002-09-04 22:31:48 +02:00
SysScanDesc tgscan;
2000-02-18 10:30:20 +01:00
HeapTuple htup;
MemoryContext oldContext;
int i;
/*
* Allocate a working array to hold the triggers (the array is extended if
* necessary)
*/
maxtrigs = 16;
triggers = (Trigger *) palloc(maxtrigs * sizeof(Trigger));
numtrigs = 0;
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* Note: since we scan the triggers using TriggerRelidNameIndexId, we will
* be reading the triggers in name order, except possibly during
2006-10-04 02:30:14 +02:00
* emergency-recovery operations (ie, IgnoreSystemIndexes). This in turn
* ensures that triggers will be fired in name order.
*/
ScanKeyInit(&skey,
Anum_pg_trigger_tgrelid,
BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_OIDEQ,
ObjectIdGetDatum(RelationGetRelid(relation)));
tgrel = heap_open(TriggerRelationId, AccessShareLock);
tgscan = systable_beginscan(tgrel, TriggerRelidNameIndexId, true,
NULL, 1, &skey);
while (HeapTupleIsValid(htup = systable_getnext(tgscan)))
{
Form_pg_trigger pg_trigger = (Form_pg_trigger) GETSTRUCT(htup);
Trigger *build;
Datum datum;
bool isnull;
if (numtrigs >= maxtrigs)
{
maxtrigs *= 2;
triggers = (Trigger *) repalloc(triggers, maxtrigs * sizeof(Trigger));
}
build = &(triggers[numtrigs]);
build->tgoid = HeapTupleGetOid(htup);
build->tgname = DatumGetCString(DirectFunctionCall1(nameout,
NameGetDatum(&pg_trigger->tgname)));
build->tgfoid = pg_trigger->tgfoid;
build->tgtype = pg_trigger->tgtype;
build->tgenabled = pg_trigger->tgenabled;
build->tgisinternal = pg_trigger->tgisinternal;
build->tgconstrrelid = pg_trigger->tgconstrrelid;
build->tgconstrindid = pg_trigger->tgconstrindid;
build->tgconstraint = pg_trigger->tgconstraint;
build->tgdeferrable = pg_trigger->tgdeferrable;
build->tginitdeferred = pg_trigger->tginitdeferred;
build->tgnargs = pg_trigger->tgnargs;
/* tgattr is first var-width field, so OK to access directly */
build->tgnattr = pg_trigger->tgattr.dim1;
if (build->tgnattr > 0)
{
build->tgattr = (int16 *) palloc(build->tgnattr * sizeof(int16));
memcpy(build->tgattr, &(pg_trigger->tgattr.values),
build->tgnattr * sizeof(int16));
}
else
build->tgattr = NULL;
if (build->tgnargs > 0)
{
bytea *val;
char *p;
val = DatumGetByteaPP(fastgetattr(htup,
Anum_pg_trigger_tgargs,
tgrel->rd_att, &isnull));
if (isnull)
elog(ERROR, "tgargs is null in trigger for relation \"%s\"",
RelationGetRelationName(relation));
p = (char *) VARDATA_ANY(val);
build->tgargs = (char **) palloc(build->tgnargs * sizeof(char *));
for (i = 0; i < build->tgnargs; i++)
{
build->tgargs[i] = pstrdup(p);
p += strlen(p) + 1;
}
}
else
build->tgargs = NULL;
datum = fastgetattr(htup, Anum_pg_trigger_tgoldtable,
tgrel->rd_att, &isnull);
if (!isnull)
build->tgoldtable =
DatumGetCString(DirectFunctionCall1(nameout, datum));
else
build->tgoldtable = NULL;
datum = fastgetattr(htup, Anum_pg_trigger_tgnewtable,
tgrel->rd_att, &isnull);
if (!isnull)
build->tgnewtable =
DatumGetCString(DirectFunctionCall1(nameout, datum));
else
build->tgnewtable = NULL;
datum = fastgetattr(htup, Anum_pg_trigger_tgqual,
tgrel->rd_att, &isnull);
if (!isnull)
build->tgqual = TextDatumGetCString(datum);
else
build->tgqual = NULL;
numtrigs++;
}
systable_endscan(tgscan);
heap_close(tgrel, AccessShareLock);
/* There might not be any triggers */
if (numtrigs == 0)
{
pfree(triggers);
return;
}
/* Build trigdesc */
trigdesc = (TriggerDesc *) palloc0(sizeof(TriggerDesc));
trigdesc->triggers = triggers;
trigdesc->numtriggers = numtrigs;
for (i = 0; i < numtrigs; i++)
SetTriggerFlags(trigdesc, &(triggers[i]));
/* Copy completed trigdesc into cache storage */
oldContext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(CacheMemoryContext);
relation->trigdesc = CopyTriggerDesc(trigdesc);
MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldContext);
/* Release working memory */
FreeTriggerDesc(trigdesc);
1997-09-04 15:19:01 +02:00
}
/*
* Update the TriggerDesc's hint flags to include the specified trigger
*/
1997-09-04 15:19:01 +02:00
static void
SetTriggerFlags(TriggerDesc *trigdesc, Trigger *trigger)
1997-09-04 15:19:01 +02:00
{
int16 tgtype = trigger->tgtype;
trigdesc->trig_insert_before_row |=
TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(tgtype, TRIGGER_TYPE_ROW,
TRIGGER_TYPE_BEFORE, TRIGGER_TYPE_INSERT);
trigdesc->trig_insert_after_row |=
TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(tgtype, TRIGGER_TYPE_ROW,
TRIGGER_TYPE_AFTER, TRIGGER_TYPE_INSERT);
trigdesc->trig_insert_instead_row |=
TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(tgtype, TRIGGER_TYPE_ROW,
TRIGGER_TYPE_INSTEAD, TRIGGER_TYPE_INSERT);
trigdesc->trig_insert_before_statement |=
TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(tgtype, TRIGGER_TYPE_STATEMENT,
TRIGGER_TYPE_BEFORE, TRIGGER_TYPE_INSERT);
trigdesc->trig_insert_after_statement |=
TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(tgtype, TRIGGER_TYPE_STATEMENT,
TRIGGER_TYPE_AFTER, TRIGGER_TYPE_INSERT);
trigdesc->trig_update_before_row |=
TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(tgtype, TRIGGER_TYPE_ROW,
TRIGGER_TYPE_BEFORE, TRIGGER_TYPE_UPDATE);
trigdesc->trig_update_after_row |=
TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(tgtype, TRIGGER_TYPE_ROW,
TRIGGER_TYPE_AFTER, TRIGGER_TYPE_UPDATE);
trigdesc->trig_update_instead_row |=
TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(tgtype, TRIGGER_TYPE_ROW,
TRIGGER_TYPE_INSTEAD, TRIGGER_TYPE_UPDATE);
trigdesc->trig_update_before_statement |=
TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(tgtype, TRIGGER_TYPE_STATEMENT,
TRIGGER_TYPE_BEFORE, TRIGGER_TYPE_UPDATE);
trigdesc->trig_update_after_statement |=
TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(tgtype, TRIGGER_TYPE_STATEMENT,
TRIGGER_TYPE_AFTER, TRIGGER_TYPE_UPDATE);
trigdesc->trig_delete_before_row |=
TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(tgtype, TRIGGER_TYPE_ROW,
TRIGGER_TYPE_BEFORE, TRIGGER_TYPE_DELETE);
trigdesc->trig_delete_after_row |=
TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(tgtype, TRIGGER_TYPE_ROW,
TRIGGER_TYPE_AFTER, TRIGGER_TYPE_DELETE);
trigdesc->trig_delete_instead_row |=
TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(tgtype, TRIGGER_TYPE_ROW,
TRIGGER_TYPE_INSTEAD, TRIGGER_TYPE_DELETE);
trigdesc->trig_delete_before_statement |=
TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(tgtype, TRIGGER_TYPE_STATEMENT,
TRIGGER_TYPE_BEFORE, TRIGGER_TYPE_DELETE);
trigdesc->trig_delete_after_statement |=
TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(tgtype, TRIGGER_TYPE_STATEMENT,
TRIGGER_TYPE_AFTER, TRIGGER_TYPE_DELETE);
/* there are no row-level truncate triggers */
trigdesc->trig_truncate_before_statement |=
TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(tgtype, TRIGGER_TYPE_STATEMENT,
TRIGGER_TYPE_BEFORE, TRIGGER_TYPE_TRUNCATE);
trigdesc->trig_truncate_after_statement |=
TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(tgtype, TRIGGER_TYPE_STATEMENT,
TRIGGER_TYPE_AFTER, TRIGGER_TYPE_TRUNCATE);
trigdesc->trig_insert_new_table |=
(TRIGGER_FOR_INSERT(tgtype) &&
TRIGGER_USES_TRANSITION_TABLE(trigger->tgnewtable));
trigdesc->trig_update_old_table |=
(TRIGGER_FOR_UPDATE(tgtype) &&
TRIGGER_USES_TRANSITION_TABLE(trigger->tgoldtable));
trigdesc->trig_update_new_table |=
(TRIGGER_FOR_UPDATE(tgtype) &&
TRIGGER_USES_TRANSITION_TABLE(trigger->tgnewtable));
trigdesc->trig_delete_old_table |=
(TRIGGER_FOR_DELETE(tgtype) &&
TRIGGER_USES_TRANSITION_TABLE(trigger->tgoldtable));
}
/*
* Copy a TriggerDesc data structure.
*
* The copy is allocated in the current memory context.
*/
TriggerDesc *
CopyTriggerDesc(TriggerDesc *trigdesc)
{
TriggerDesc *newdesc;
Trigger *trigger;
int i;
if (trigdesc == NULL || trigdesc->numtriggers <= 0)
return NULL;
newdesc = (TriggerDesc *) palloc(sizeof(TriggerDesc));
memcpy(newdesc, trigdesc, sizeof(TriggerDesc));
trigger = (Trigger *) palloc(trigdesc->numtriggers * sizeof(Trigger));
memcpy(trigger, trigdesc->triggers,
trigdesc->numtriggers * sizeof(Trigger));
newdesc->triggers = trigger;
for (i = 0; i < trigdesc->numtriggers; i++)
{
trigger->tgname = pstrdup(trigger->tgname);
if (trigger->tgnattr > 0)
{
int16 *newattr;
newattr = (int16 *) palloc(trigger->tgnattr * sizeof(int16));
memcpy(newattr, trigger->tgattr,
trigger->tgnattr * sizeof(int16));
trigger->tgattr = newattr;
}
if (trigger->tgnargs > 0)
{
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
char **newargs;
int16 j;
newargs = (char **) palloc(trigger->tgnargs * sizeof(char *));
for (j = 0; j < trigger->tgnargs; j++)
newargs[j] = pstrdup(trigger->tgargs[j]);
trigger->tgargs = newargs;
}
if (trigger->tgqual)
trigger->tgqual = pstrdup(trigger->tgqual);
if (trigger->tgoldtable)
trigger->tgoldtable = pstrdup(trigger->tgoldtable);
if (trigger->tgnewtable)
trigger->tgnewtable = pstrdup(trigger->tgnewtable);
trigger++;
}
return newdesc;
}
/*
* Free a TriggerDesc data structure.
*/
void
FreeTriggerDesc(TriggerDesc *trigdesc)
{
Trigger *trigger;
int i;
if (trigdesc == NULL)
return;
trigger = trigdesc->triggers;
for (i = 0; i < trigdesc->numtriggers; i++)
{
pfree(trigger->tgname);
if (trigger->tgnattr > 0)
pfree(trigger->tgattr);
if (trigger->tgnargs > 0)
{
while (--(trigger->tgnargs) >= 0)
pfree(trigger->tgargs[trigger->tgnargs]);
pfree(trigger->tgargs);
}
if (trigger->tgqual)
pfree(trigger->tgqual);
if (trigger->tgoldtable)
pfree(trigger->tgoldtable);
if (trigger->tgnewtable)
pfree(trigger->tgnewtable);
trigger++;
}
pfree(trigdesc->triggers);
pfree(trigdesc);
}
/*
* Compare two TriggerDesc structures for logical equality.
*/
#ifdef NOT_USED
bool
equalTriggerDescs(TriggerDesc *trigdesc1, TriggerDesc *trigdesc2)
{
int i,
j;
/*
* We need not examine the hint flags, just the trigger array itself; if
* we have the same triggers with the same types, the flags should match.
*
* As of 7.3 we assume trigger set ordering is significant in the
* comparison; so we just compare corresponding slots of the two sets.
*
* Note: comparing the stringToNode forms of the WHEN clauses means that
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
* parse column locations will affect the result. This is okay as long as
* this function is only used for detecting exact equality, as for example
* in checking for staleness of a cache entry.
*/
if (trigdesc1 != NULL)
{
if (trigdesc2 == NULL)
return false;
if (trigdesc1->numtriggers != trigdesc2->numtriggers)
return false;
for (i = 0; i < trigdesc1->numtriggers; i++)
{
Trigger *trig1 = trigdesc1->triggers + i;
Trigger *trig2 = trigdesc2->triggers + i;
if (trig1->tgoid != trig2->tgoid)
return false;
if (strcmp(trig1->tgname, trig2->tgname) != 0)
return false;
if (trig1->tgfoid != trig2->tgfoid)
return false;
if (trig1->tgtype != trig2->tgtype)
return false;
if (trig1->tgenabled != trig2->tgenabled)
return false;
if (trig1->tgisinternal != trig2->tgisinternal)
return false;
if (trig1->tgconstrrelid != trig2->tgconstrrelid)
return false;
if (trig1->tgconstrindid != trig2->tgconstrindid)
return false;
if (trig1->tgconstraint != trig2->tgconstraint)
return false;
if (trig1->tgdeferrable != trig2->tgdeferrable)
return false;
if (trig1->tginitdeferred != trig2->tginitdeferred)
return false;
if (trig1->tgnargs != trig2->tgnargs)
return false;
if (trig1->tgnattr != trig2->tgnattr)
return false;
if (trig1->tgnattr > 0 &&
memcmp(trig1->tgattr, trig2->tgattr,
trig1->tgnattr * sizeof(int16)) != 0)
return false;
for (j = 0; j < trig1->tgnargs; j++)
if (strcmp(trig1->tgargs[j], trig2->tgargs[j]) != 0)
return false;
if (trig1->tgqual == NULL && trig2->tgqual == NULL)
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
/* ok */ ;
else if (trig1->tgqual == NULL || trig2->tgqual == NULL)
return false;
else if (strcmp(trig1->tgqual, trig2->tgqual) != 0)
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
return false;
if (trig1->tgoldtable == NULL && trig2->tgoldtable == NULL)
/* ok */ ;
else if (trig1->tgoldtable == NULL || trig2->tgoldtable == NULL)
return false;
else if (strcmp(trig1->tgoldtable, trig2->tgoldtable) != 0)
return false;
if (trig1->tgnewtable == NULL && trig2->tgnewtable == NULL)
/* ok */ ;
else if (trig1->tgnewtable == NULL || trig2->tgnewtable == NULL)
return false;
else if (strcmp(trig1->tgnewtable, trig2->tgnewtable) != 0)
return false;
}
}
else if (trigdesc2 != NULL)
return false;
return true;
}
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
#endif /* NOT_USED */
/*
* Check if there is a row-level trigger with transition tables that prevents
* a table from becoming an inheritance child or partition. Return the name
* of the first such incompatible trigger, or NULL if there is none.
*/
const char *
FindTriggerIncompatibleWithInheritance(TriggerDesc *trigdesc)
{
if (trigdesc != NULL)
{
2017-08-14 23:29:33 +02:00
int i;
for (i = 0; i < trigdesc->numtriggers; ++i)
{
2017-08-14 23:29:33 +02:00
Trigger *trigger = &trigdesc->triggers[i];
if (trigger->tgoldtable != NULL || trigger->tgnewtable != NULL)
return trigger->tgname;
}
}
return NULL;
}
/*
* Call a trigger function.
*
* trigdata: trigger descriptor.
* tgindx: trigger's index in finfo and instr arrays.
* finfo: array of cached trigger function call information.
* instr: optional array of EXPLAIN ANALYZE instrumentation state.
* per_tuple_context: memory context to execute the function in.
*
* Returns the tuple (or NULL) as returned by the function.
*/
static HeapTuple
ExecCallTriggerFunc(TriggerData *trigdata,
int tgindx,
FmgrInfo *finfo,
Instrumentation *instr,
MemoryContext per_tuple_context)
{
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
FunctionCallInfoData fcinfo;
PgStat_FunctionCallUsage fcusage;
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
Datum result;
MemoryContext oldContext;
/*
* Protect against code paths that may fail to initialize transition table
* info.
*/
Assert(((TRIGGER_FIRED_BY_INSERT(trigdata->tg_event) ||
TRIGGER_FIRED_BY_UPDATE(trigdata->tg_event) ||
TRIGGER_FIRED_BY_DELETE(trigdata->tg_event)) &&
TRIGGER_FIRED_AFTER(trigdata->tg_event) &&
!(trigdata->tg_event & AFTER_TRIGGER_DEFERRABLE) &&
!(trigdata->tg_event & AFTER_TRIGGER_INITDEFERRED)) ||
(trigdata->tg_oldtable == NULL && trigdata->tg_newtable == NULL));
finfo += tgindx;
/*
* We cache fmgr lookup info, to avoid making the lookup again on each
* call.
*/
if (finfo->fn_oid == InvalidOid)
fmgr_info(trigdata->tg_trigger->tgfoid, finfo);
Assert(finfo->fn_oid == trigdata->tg_trigger->tgfoid);
/*
* If doing EXPLAIN ANALYZE, start charging time to this trigger.
*/
if (instr)
InstrStartNode(instr + tgindx);
/*
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
* Do the function evaluation in the per-tuple memory context, so that
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* leaked memory will be reclaimed once per tuple. Note in particular that
* any new tuple created by the trigger function will live till the end of
* the tuple cycle.
*/
oldContext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(per_tuple_context);
/*
* Call the function, passing no arguments but setting a context.
*/
InitFunctionCallInfoData(fcinfo, finfo, 0,
InvalidOid, (Node *) trigdata, NULL);
pgstat_init_function_usage(&fcinfo, &fcusage);
MyTriggerDepth++;
PG_TRY();
{
result = FunctionCallInvoke(&fcinfo);
}
PG_CATCH();
{
MyTriggerDepth--;
PG_RE_THROW();
}
PG_END_TRY();
MyTriggerDepth--;
pgstat_end_function_usage(&fcusage, true);
MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldContext);
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* Trigger protocol allows function to return a null pointer, but NOT to
* set the isnull result flag.
*/
if (fcinfo.isnull)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_E_R_I_E_TRIGGER_PROTOCOL_VIOLATED),
errmsg("trigger function %u returned null value",
fcinfo.flinfo->fn_oid)));
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* If doing EXPLAIN ANALYZE, stop charging time to this trigger, and count
* one "tuple returned" (really the number of firings).
*/
if (instr)
InstrStopNode(instr + tgindx, 1);
return (HeapTuple) DatumGetPointer(result);
}
void
ExecBSInsertTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo)
{
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
TriggerDesc *trigdesc;
int i;
TriggerData LocTriggerData;
trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc;
if (trigdesc == NULL)
return;
if (!trigdesc->trig_insert_before_statement)
return;
/* no-op if we already fired BS triggers in this context */
if (before_stmt_triggers_fired(RelationGetRelid(relinfo->ri_RelationDesc),
CMD_INSERT))
return;
LocTriggerData.type = T_TriggerData;
LocTriggerData.tg_event = TRIGGER_EVENT_INSERT |
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
TRIGGER_EVENT_BEFORE;
LocTriggerData.tg_relation = relinfo->ri_RelationDesc;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuple = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuple = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_oldtable = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtable = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
for (i = 0; i < trigdesc->numtriggers; i++)
{
Trigger *trigger = &trigdesc->triggers[i];
HeapTuple newtuple;
if (!TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(trigger->tgtype,
TRIGGER_TYPE_STATEMENT,
TRIGGER_TYPE_BEFORE,
TRIGGER_TYPE_INSERT))
continue;
if (!TriggerEnabled(estate, relinfo, trigger, LocTriggerData.tg_event,
NULL, NULL, NULL))
continue;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigger = trigger;
newtuple = ExecCallTriggerFunc(&LocTriggerData,
i,
relinfo->ri_TrigFunctions,
relinfo->ri_TrigInstrument,
GetPerTupleMemoryContext(estate));
if (newtuple)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_E_R_I_E_TRIGGER_PROTOCOL_VIOLATED),
errmsg("BEFORE STATEMENT trigger cannot return a value")));
}
}
void
ExecASInsertTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
TransitionCaptureState *transition_capture)
{
TriggerDesc *trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc;
if (trigdesc && trigdesc->trig_insert_after_statement)
AfterTriggerSaveEvent(estate, relinfo, TRIGGER_EVENT_INSERT,
false, NULL, NULL, NIL, NULL, transition_capture);
}
TupleTableSlot *
ExecBRInsertTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
TupleTableSlot *slot)
{
TriggerDesc *trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc;
HeapTuple slottuple = ExecMaterializeSlot(slot);
HeapTuple newtuple = slottuple;
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
HeapTuple oldtuple;
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
TriggerData LocTriggerData;
int i;
LocTriggerData.type = T_TriggerData;
LocTriggerData.tg_event = TRIGGER_EVENT_INSERT |
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
TRIGGER_EVENT_ROW |
TRIGGER_EVENT_BEFORE;
LocTriggerData.tg_relation = relinfo->ri_RelationDesc;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuple = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_oldtable = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtable = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
for (i = 0; i < trigdesc->numtriggers; i++)
{
Trigger *trigger = &trigdesc->triggers[i];
if (!TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(trigger->tgtype,
TRIGGER_TYPE_ROW,
TRIGGER_TYPE_BEFORE,
TRIGGER_TYPE_INSERT))
continue;
if (!TriggerEnabled(estate, relinfo, trigger, LocTriggerData.tg_event,
NULL, NULL, newtuple))
continue;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuple = oldtuple = newtuple;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigger = trigger;
newtuple = ExecCallTriggerFunc(&LocTriggerData,
i,
relinfo->ri_TrigFunctions,
relinfo->ri_TrigInstrument,
GetPerTupleMemoryContext(estate));
if (oldtuple != newtuple && oldtuple != slottuple)
heap_freetuple(oldtuple);
if (newtuple == NULL)
return NULL; /* "do nothing" */
}
if (newtuple != slottuple)
{
/*
* Return the modified tuple using the es_trig_tuple_slot. We assume
* the tuple was allocated in per-tuple memory context, and therefore
* will go away by itself. The tuple table slot should not try to
* clear it.
*/
TupleTableSlot *newslot = estate->es_trig_tuple_slot;
TupleDesc tupdesc = RelationGetDescr(relinfo->ri_RelationDesc);
if (newslot->tts_tupleDescriptor != tupdesc)
ExecSetSlotDescriptor(newslot, tupdesc);
ExecStoreTuple(newtuple, newslot, InvalidBuffer, false);
slot = newslot;
}
return slot;
}
void
ExecARInsertTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
HeapTuple trigtuple, List *recheckIndexes,
TransitionCaptureState *transition_capture)
{
TriggerDesc *trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc;
if ((trigdesc && trigdesc->trig_insert_after_row) ||
(transition_capture && transition_capture->tcs_insert_new_table))
AfterTriggerSaveEvent(estate, relinfo, TRIGGER_EVENT_INSERT,
true, NULL, trigtuple,
recheckIndexes, NULL,
transition_capture);
}
TupleTableSlot *
ExecIRInsertTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
TupleTableSlot *slot)
{
TriggerDesc *trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc;
HeapTuple slottuple = ExecMaterializeSlot(slot);
HeapTuple newtuple = slottuple;
HeapTuple oldtuple;
TriggerData LocTriggerData;
int i;
LocTriggerData.type = T_TriggerData;
LocTriggerData.tg_event = TRIGGER_EVENT_INSERT |
TRIGGER_EVENT_ROW |
TRIGGER_EVENT_INSTEAD;
LocTriggerData.tg_relation = relinfo->ri_RelationDesc;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuple = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_oldtable = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtable = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
for (i = 0; i < trigdesc->numtriggers; i++)
{
Trigger *trigger = &trigdesc->triggers[i];
if (!TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(trigger->tgtype,
TRIGGER_TYPE_ROW,
TRIGGER_TYPE_INSTEAD,
TRIGGER_TYPE_INSERT))
continue;
if (!TriggerEnabled(estate, relinfo, trigger, LocTriggerData.tg_event,
NULL, NULL, newtuple))
continue;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuple = oldtuple = newtuple;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigger = trigger;
newtuple = ExecCallTriggerFunc(&LocTriggerData,
i,
relinfo->ri_TrigFunctions,
relinfo->ri_TrigInstrument,
GetPerTupleMemoryContext(estate));
if (oldtuple != newtuple && oldtuple != slottuple)
heap_freetuple(oldtuple);
if (newtuple == NULL)
return NULL; /* "do nothing" */
}
if (newtuple != slottuple)
{
/*
* Return the modified tuple using the es_trig_tuple_slot. We assume
* the tuple was allocated in per-tuple memory context, and therefore
* will go away by itself. The tuple table slot should not try to
* clear it.
*/
TupleTableSlot *newslot = estate->es_trig_tuple_slot;
TupleDesc tupdesc = RelationGetDescr(relinfo->ri_RelationDesc);
if (newslot->tts_tupleDescriptor != tupdesc)
ExecSetSlotDescriptor(newslot, tupdesc);
ExecStoreTuple(newtuple, newslot, InvalidBuffer, false);
slot = newslot;
}
return slot;
}
void
ExecBSDeleteTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo)
{
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
TriggerDesc *trigdesc;
int i;
TriggerData LocTriggerData;
trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc;
if (trigdesc == NULL)
return;
if (!trigdesc->trig_delete_before_statement)
return;
/* no-op if we already fired BS triggers in this context */
if (before_stmt_triggers_fired(RelationGetRelid(relinfo->ri_RelationDesc),
CMD_DELETE))
return;
LocTriggerData.type = T_TriggerData;
LocTriggerData.tg_event = TRIGGER_EVENT_DELETE |
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
TRIGGER_EVENT_BEFORE;
LocTriggerData.tg_relation = relinfo->ri_RelationDesc;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuple = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuple = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_oldtable = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtable = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
for (i = 0; i < trigdesc->numtriggers; i++)
{
Trigger *trigger = &trigdesc->triggers[i];
HeapTuple newtuple;
if (!TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(trigger->tgtype,
TRIGGER_TYPE_STATEMENT,
TRIGGER_TYPE_BEFORE,
TRIGGER_TYPE_DELETE))
continue;
if (!TriggerEnabled(estate, relinfo, trigger, LocTriggerData.tg_event,
NULL, NULL, NULL))
continue;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigger = trigger;
newtuple = ExecCallTriggerFunc(&LocTriggerData,
i,
relinfo->ri_TrigFunctions,
relinfo->ri_TrigInstrument,
GetPerTupleMemoryContext(estate));
if (newtuple)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_E_R_I_E_TRIGGER_PROTOCOL_VIOLATED),
errmsg("BEFORE STATEMENT trigger cannot return a value")));
}
}
void
ExecASDeleteTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
TransitionCaptureState *transition_capture)
{
TriggerDesc *trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc;
if (trigdesc && trigdesc->trig_delete_after_statement)
AfterTriggerSaveEvent(estate, relinfo, TRIGGER_EVENT_DELETE,
false, NULL, NULL, NIL, NULL, transition_capture);
}
bool
ExecBRDeleteTriggers(EState *estate, EPQState *epqstate,
ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
ItemPointer tupleid,
HeapTuple fdw_trigtuple)
{
TriggerDesc *trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc;
bool result = true;
TriggerData LocTriggerData;
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
HeapTuple trigtuple;
HeapTuple newtuple;
TupleTableSlot *newSlot;
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
int i;
Assert(HeapTupleIsValid(fdw_trigtuple) ^ ItemPointerIsValid(tupleid));
if (fdw_trigtuple == NULL)
{
trigtuple = GetTupleForTrigger(estate, epqstate, relinfo, tupleid,
LockTupleExclusive, &newSlot);
if (trigtuple == NULL)
return false;
}
else
trigtuple = fdw_trigtuple;
LocTriggerData.type = T_TriggerData;
LocTriggerData.tg_event = TRIGGER_EVENT_DELETE |
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
TRIGGER_EVENT_ROW |
TRIGGER_EVENT_BEFORE;
LocTriggerData.tg_relation = relinfo->ri_RelationDesc;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuple = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_oldtable = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtable = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
for (i = 0; i < trigdesc->numtriggers; i++)
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
{
Trigger *trigger = &trigdesc->triggers[i];
if (!TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(trigger->tgtype,
TRIGGER_TYPE_ROW,
TRIGGER_TYPE_BEFORE,
TRIGGER_TYPE_DELETE))
continue;
if (!TriggerEnabled(estate, relinfo, trigger, LocTriggerData.tg_event,
NULL, trigtuple, NULL))
continue;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuple = trigtuple;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigger = trigger;
newtuple = ExecCallTriggerFunc(&LocTriggerData,
i,
relinfo->ri_TrigFunctions,
relinfo->ri_TrigInstrument,
GetPerTupleMemoryContext(estate));
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
if (newtuple == NULL)
{
result = false; /* tell caller to suppress delete */
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
break;
}
if (newtuple != trigtuple)
heap_freetuple(newtuple);
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
}
if (trigtuple != fdw_trigtuple)
heap_freetuple(trigtuple);
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
return result;
}
void
ExecARDeleteTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
ItemPointer tupleid,
HeapTuple fdw_trigtuple,
TransitionCaptureState *transition_capture)
{
TriggerDesc *trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc;
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
if ((trigdesc && trigdesc->trig_delete_after_row) ||
(transition_capture && transition_capture->tcs_delete_old_table))
{
HeapTuple trigtuple;
Assert(HeapTupleIsValid(fdw_trigtuple) ^ ItemPointerIsValid(tupleid));
if (fdw_trigtuple == NULL)
trigtuple = GetTupleForTrigger(estate,
NULL,
relinfo,
tupleid,
LockTupleExclusive,
NULL);
else
trigtuple = fdw_trigtuple;
AfterTriggerSaveEvent(estate, relinfo, TRIGGER_EVENT_DELETE,
true, trigtuple, NULL, NIL, NULL,
transition_capture);
if (trigtuple != fdw_trigtuple)
heap_freetuple(trigtuple);
}
}
bool
ExecIRDeleteTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
HeapTuple trigtuple)
{
TriggerDesc *trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc;
TriggerData LocTriggerData;
HeapTuple rettuple;
int i;
LocTriggerData.type = T_TriggerData;
LocTriggerData.tg_event = TRIGGER_EVENT_DELETE |
TRIGGER_EVENT_ROW |
TRIGGER_EVENT_INSTEAD;
LocTriggerData.tg_relation = relinfo->ri_RelationDesc;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuple = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_oldtable = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtable = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
for (i = 0; i < trigdesc->numtriggers; i++)
{
Trigger *trigger = &trigdesc->triggers[i];
if (!TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(trigger->tgtype,
TRIGGER_TYPE_ROW,
TRIGGER_TYPE_INSTEAD,
TRIGGER_TYPE_DELETE))
continue;
if (!TriggerEnabled(estate, relinfo, trigger, LocTriggerData.tg_event,
NULL, trigtuple, NULL))
continue;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuple = trigtuple;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigger = trigger;
rettuple = ExecCallTriggerFunc(&LocTriggerData,
i,
relinfo->ri_TrigFunctions,
relinfo->ri_TrigInstrument,
GetPerTupleMemoryContext(estate));
if (rettuple == NULL)
return false; /* Delete was suppressed */
if (rettuple != trigtuple)
heap_freetuple(rettuple);
}
return true;
}
void
ExecBSUpdateTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo)
{
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
TriggerDesc *trigdesc;
int i;
TriggerData LocTriggerData;
Bitmapset *updatedCols;
trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc;
if (trigdesc == NULL)
return;
if (!trigdesc->trig_update_before_statement)
return;
/* no-op if we already fired BS triggers in this context */
if (before_stmt_triggers_fired(RelationGetRelid(relinfo->ri_RelationDesc),
CMD_UPDATE))
return;
updatedCols = GetUpdatedColumns(relinfo, estate);
LocTriggerData.type = T_TriggerData;
LocTriggerData.tg_event = TRIGGER_EVENT_UPDATE |
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
TRIGGER_EVENT_BEFORE;
LocTriggerData.tg_relation = relinfo->ri_RelationDesc;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuple = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuple = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_oldtable = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtable = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
for (i = 0; i < trigdesc->numtriggers; i++)
{
Trigger *trigger = &trigdesc->triggers[i];
HeapTuple newtuple;
if (!TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(trigger->tgtype,
TRIGGER_TYPE_STATEMENT,
TRIGGER_TYPE_BEFORE,
TRIGGER_TYPE_UPDATE))
continue;
if (!TriggerEnabled(estate, relinfo, trigger, LocTriggerData.tg_event,
updatedCols, NULL, NULL))
continue;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigger = trigger;
newtuple = ExecCallTriggerFunc(&LocTriggerData,
i,
relinfo->ri_TrigFunctions,
relinfo->ri_TrigInstrument,
GetPerTupleMemoryContext(estate));
if (newtuple)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_E_R_I_E_TRIGGER_PROTOCOL_VIOLATED),
errmsg("BEFORE STATEMENT trigger cannot return a value")));
}
}
void
ExecASUpdateTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
TransitionCaptureState *transition_capture)
{
TriggerDesc *trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc;
if (trigdesc && trigdesc->trig_update_after_statement)
AfterTriggerSaveEvent(estate, relinfo, TRIGGER_EVENT_UPDATE,
false, NULL, NULL, NIL,
GetUpdatedColumns(relinfo, estate),
transition_capture);
}
TupleTableSlot *
ExecBRUpdateTriggers(EState *estate, EPQState *epqstate,
ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
ItemPointer tupleid,
HeapTuple fdw_trigtuple,
TupleTableSlot *slot)
{
TriggerDesc *trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc;
HeapTuple slottuple = ExecMaterializeSlot(slot);
HeapTuple newtuple = slottuple;
TriggerData LocTriggerData;
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
HeapTuple trigtuple;
HeapTuple oldtuple;
TupleTableSlot *newSlot;
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
int i;
Bitmapset *updatedCols;
Improve concurrency of foreign key locking This patch introduces two additional lock modes for tuples: "SELECT FOR KEY SHARE" and "SELECT FOR NO KEY UPDATE". These don't block each other, in contrast with already existing "SELECT FOR SHARE" and "SELECT FOR UPDATE". UPDATE commands that do not modify the values stored in the columns that are part of the key of the tuple now grab a SELECT FOR NO KEY UPDATE lock on the tuple, allowing them to proceed concurrently with tuple locks of the FOR KEY SHARE variety. Foreign key triggers now use FOR KEY SHARE instead of FOR SHARE; this means the concurrency improvement applies to them, which is the whole point of this patch. The added tuple lock semantics require some rejiggering of the multixact module, so that the locking level that each transaction is holding can be stored alongside its Xid. Also, multixacts now need to persist across server restarts and crashes, because they can now represent not only tuple locks, but also tuple updates. This means we need more careful tracking of lifetime of pg_multixact SLRU files; since they now persist longer, we require more infrastructure to figure out when they can be removed. pg_upgrade also needs to be careful to copy pg_multixact files over from the old server to the new, or at least part of multixact.c state, depending on the versions of the old and new servers. Tuple time qualification rules (HeapTupleSatisfies routines) need to be careful not to consider tuples with the "is multi" infomask bit set as being only locked; they might need to look up MultiXact values (i.e. possibly do pg_multixact I/O) to find out the Xid that updated a tuple, whereas they previously were assured to only use information readily available from the tuple header. This is considered acceptable, because the extra I/O would involve cases that would previously cause some commands to block waiting for concurrent transactions to finish. Another important change is the fact that locking tuples that have previously been updated causes the future versions to be marked as locked, too; this is essential for correctness of foreign key checks. This causes additional WAL-logging, also (there was previously a single WAL record for a locked tuple; now there are as many as updated copies of the tuple there exist.) With all this in place, contention related to tuples being checked by foreign key rules should be much reduced. As a bonus, the old behavior that a subtransaction grabbing a stronger tuple lock than the parent (sub)transaction held on a given tuple and later aborting caused the weaker lock to be lost, has been fixed. Many new spec files were added for isolation tester framework, to ensure overall behavior is sane. There's probably room for several more tests. There were several reviewers of this patch; in particular, Noah Misch and Andres Freund spent considerable time in it. Original idea for the patch came from Simon Riggs, after a problem report by Joel Jacobson. Most code is from me, with contributions from Marti Raudsepp, Alexander Shulgin, Noah Misch and Andres Freund. This patch was discussed in several pgsql-hackers threads; the most important start at the following message-ids: AANLkTimo9XVcEzfiBR-ut3KVNDkjm2Vxh+t8kAmWjPuv@mail.gmail.com 1290721684-sup-3951@alvh.no-ip.org 1294953201-sup-2099@alvh.no-ip.org 1320343602-sup-2290@alvh.no-ip.org 1339690386-sup-8927@alvh.no-ip.org 4FE5FF020200002500048A3D@gw.wicourts.gov 4FEAB90A0200002500048B7D@gw.wicourts.gov
2013-01-23 16:04:59 +01:00
LockTupleMode lockmode;
Add support for INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING/UPDATE. The newly added ON CONFLICT clause allows to specify an alternative to raising a unique or exclusion constraint violation error when inserting. ON CONFLICT refers to constraints that can either be specified using a inference clause (by specifying the columns of a unique constraint) or by naming a unique or exclusion constraint. DO NOTHING avoids the constraint violation, without touching the pre-existing row. DO UPDATE SET ... [WHERE ...] updates the pre-existing tuple, and has access to both the tuple proposed for insertion and the existing tuple; the optional WHERE clause can be used to prevent an update from being executed. The UPDATE SET and WHERE clauses have access to the tuple proposed for insertion using the "magic" EXCLUDED alias, and to the pre-existing tuple using the table name or its alias. This feature is often referred to as upsert. This is implemented using a new infrastructure called "speculative insertion". It is an optimistic variant of regular insertion that first does a pre-check for existing tuples and then attempts an insert. If a violating tuple was inserted concurrently, the speculatively inserted tuple is deleted and a new attempt is made. If the pre-check finds a matching tuple the alternative DO NOTHING or DO UPDATE action is taken. If the insertion succeeds without detecting a conflict, the tuple is deemed inserted. To handle the possible ambiguity between the excluded alias and a table named excluded, and for convenience with long relation names, INSERT INTO now can alias its target table. Bumps catversion as stored rules change. Author: Peter Geoghegan, with significant contributions from Heikki Linnakangas and Andres Freund. Testing infrastructure by Jeff Janes. Reviewed-By: Heikki Linnakangas, Andres Freund, Robert Haas, Simon Riggs, Dean Rasheed, Stephen Frost and many others.
2015-05-08 05:31:36 +02:00
/* Determine lock mode to use */
lockmode = ExecUpdateLockMode(estate, relinfo);
Assert(HeapTupleIsValid(fdw_trigtuple) ^ ItemPointerIsValid(tupleid));
if (fdw_trigtuple == NULL)
{
/* get a copy of the on-disk tuple we are planning to update */
trigtuple = GetTupleForTrigger(estate, epqstate, relinfo, tupleid,
lockmode, &newSlot);
if (trigtuple == NULL)
return NULL; /* cancel the update action */
}
else
{
trigtuple = fdw_trigtuple;
newSlot = NULL;
}
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
/*
* In READ COMMITTED isolation level it's possible that target tuple was
* changed due to concurrent update. In that case we have a raw subplan
* output tuple in newSlot, and need to run it through the junk filter to
* produce an insertable tuple.
*
* Caution: more than likely, the passed-in slot is the same as the
* junkfilter's output slot, so we are clobbering the original value of
* slottuple by doing the filtering. This is OK since neither we nor our
* caller have any more interest in the prior contents of that slot.
*/
if (newSlot != NULL)
{
slot = ExecFilterJunk(relinfo->ri_junkFilter, newSlot);
slottuple = ExecMaterializeSlot(slot);
newtuple = slottuple;
}
LocTriggerData.type = T_TriggerData;
LocTriggerData.tg_event = TRIGGER_EVENT_UPDATE |
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
TRIGGER_EVENT_ROW |
TRIGGER_EVENT_BEFORE;
LocTriggerData.tg_relation = relinfo->ri_RelationDesc;
LocTriggerData.tg_oldtable = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtable = NULL;
Add support for INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING/UPDATE. The newly added ON CONFLICT clause allows to specify an alternative to raising a unique or exclusion constraint violation error when inserting. ON CONFLICT refers to constraints that can either be specified using a inference clause (by specifying the columns of a unique constraint) or by naming a unique or exclusion constraint. DO NOTHING avoids the constraint violation, without touching the pre-existing row. DO UPDATE SET ... [WHERE ...] updates the pre-existing tuple, and has access to both the tuple proposed for insertion and the existing tuple; the optional WHERE clause can be used to prevent an update from being executed. The UPDATE SET and WHERE clauses have access to the tuple proposed for insertion using the "magic" EXCLUDED alias, and to the pre-existing tuple using the table name or its alias. This feature is often referred to as upsert. This is implemented using a new infrastructure called "speculative insertion". It is an optimistic variant of regular insertion that first does a pre-check for existing tuples and then attempts an insert. If a violating tuple was inserted concurrently, the speculatively inserted tuple is deleted and a new attempt is made. If the pre-check finds a matching tuple the alternative DO NOTHING or DO UPDATE action is taken. If the insertion succeeds without detecting a conflict, the tuple is deemed inserted. To handle the possible ambiguity between the excluded alias and a table named excluded, and for convenience with long relation names, INSERT INTO now can alias its target table. Bumps catversion as stored rules change. Author: Peter Geoghegan, with significant contributions from Heikki Linnakangas and Andres Freund. Testing infrastructure by Jeff Janes. Reviewed-By: Heikki Linnakangas, Andres Freund, Robert Haas, Simon Riggs, Dean Rasheed, Stephen Frost and many others.
2015-05-08 05:31:36 +02:00
updatedCols = GetUpdatedColumns(relinfo, estate);
for (i = 0; i < trigdesc->numtriggers; i++)
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
{
Trigger *trigger = &trigdesc->triggers[i];
if (!TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(trigger->tgtype,
TRIGGER_TYPE_ROW,
TRIGGER_TYPE_BEFORE,
TRIGGER_TYPE_UPDATE))
continue;
if (!TriggerEnabled(estate, relinfo, trigger, LocTriggerData.tg_event,
updatedCols, trigtuple, newtuple))
continue;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuple = trigtuple;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuple = oldtuple = newtuple;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigger = trigger;
newtuple = ExecCallTriggerFunc(&LocTriggerData,
i,
relinfo->ri_TrigFunctions,
relinfo->ri_TrigInstrument,
GetPerTupleMemoryContext(estate));
if (oldtuple != newtuple && oldtuple != slottuple)
heap_freetuple(oldtuple);
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
if (newtuple == NULL)
{
if (trigtuple != fdw_trigtuple)
heap_freetuple(trigtuple);
return NULL; /* "do nothing" */
}
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
}
if (trigtuple != fdw_trigtuple)
heap_freetuple(trigtuple);
if (newtuple != slottuple)
{
/*
* Return the modified tuple using the es_trig_tuple_slot. We assume
* the tuple was allocated in per-tuple memory context, and therefore
* will go away by itself. The tuple table slot should not try to
* clear it.
*/
TupleTableSlot *newslot = estate->es_trig_tuple_slot;
TupleDesc tupdesc = RelationGetDescr(relinfo->ri_RelationDesc);
if (newslot->tts_tupleDescriptor != tupdesc)
ExecSetSlotDescriptor(newslot, tupdesc);
ExecStoreTuple(newtuple, newslot, InvalidBuffer, false);
slot = newslot;
}
return slot;
}
void
ExecARUpdateTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
ItemPointer tupleid,
HeapTuple fdw_trigtuple,
HeapTuple newtuple,
List *recheckIndexes,
TransitionCaptureState *transition_capture)
{
TriggerDesc *trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc;
if ((trigdesc && trigdesc->trig_update_after_row) ||
(transition_capture &&
(transition_capture->tcs_update_old_table ||
transition_capture->tcs_update_new_table)))
{
HeapTuple trigtuple;
Assert(HeapTupleIsValid(fdw_trigtuple) ^ ItemPointerIsValid(tupleid));
if (fdw_trigtuple == NULL)
trigtuple = GetTupleForTrigger(estate,
NULL,
relinfo,
tupleid,
LockTupleExclusive,
NULL);
else
trigtuple = fdw_trigtuple;
AfterTriggerSaveEvent(estate, relinfo, TRIGGER_EVENT_UPDATE,
true, trigtuple, newtuple, recheckIndexes,
GetUpdatedColumns(relinfo, estate),
transition_capture);
if (trigtuple != fdw_trigtuple)
heap_freetuple(trigtuple);
}
}
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
TupleTableSlot *
ExecIRUpdateTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
HeapTuple trigtuple, TupleTableSlot *slot)
{
TriggerDesc *trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc;
HeapTuple slottuple = ExecMaterializeSlot(slot);
HeapTuple newtuple = slottuple;
TriggerData LocTriggerData;
HeapTuple oldtuple;
int i;
LocTriggerData.type = T_TriggerData;
LocTriggerData.tg_event = TRIGGER_EVENT_UPDATE |
TRIGGER_EVENT_ROW |
TRIGGER_EVENT_INSTEAD;
LocTriggerData.tg_relation = relinfo->ri_RelationDesc;
LocTriggerData.tg_oldtable = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtable = NULL;
for (i = 0; i < trigdesc->numtriggers; i++)
{
Trigger *trigger = &trigdesc->triggers[i];
if (!TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(trigger->tgtype,
TRIGGER_TYPE_ROW,
TRIGGER_TYPE_INSTEAD,
TRIGGER_TYPE_UPDATE))
continue;
if (!TriggerEnabled(estate, relinfo, trigger, LocTriggerData.tg_event,
NULL, trigtuple, newtuple))
continue;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuple = trigtuple;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuple = oldtuple = newtuple;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigger = trigger;
newtuple = ExecCallTriggerFunc(&LocTriggerData,
i,
relinfo->ri_TrigFunctions,
relinfo->ri_TrigInstrument,
GetPerTupleMemoryContext(estate));
if (oldtuple != newtuple && oldtuple != slottuple)
heap_freetuple(oldtuple);
if (newtuple == NULL)
return NULL; /* "do nothing" */
}
if (newtuple != slottuple)
{
/*
* Return the modified tuple using the es_trig_tuple_slot. We assume
* the tuple was allocated in per-tuple memory context, and therefore
* will go away by itself. The tuple table slot should not try to
* clear it.
*/
TupleTableSlot *newslot = estate->es_trig_tuple_slot;
TupleDesc tupdesc = RelationGetDescr(relinfo->ri_RelationDesc);
if (newslot->tts_tupleDescriptor != tupdesc)
ExecSetSlotDescriptor(newslot, tupdesc);
ExecStoreTuple(newtuple, newslot, InvalidBuffer, false);
slot = newslot;
}
return slot;
}
void
ExecBSTruncateTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo)
{
TriggerDesc *trigdesc;
int i;
TriggerData LocTriggerData;
trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc;
if (trigdesc == NULL)
return;
if (!trigdesc->trig_truncate_before_statement)
return;
LocTriggerData.type = T_TriggerData;
LocTriggerData.tg_event = TRIGGER_EVENT_TRUNCATE |
TRIGGER_EVENT_BEFORE;
LocTriggerData.tg_relation = relinfo->ri_RelationDesc;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuple = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuple = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_oldtable = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtable = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
for (i = 0; i < trigdesc->numtriggers; i++)
{
Trigger *trigger = &trigdesc->triggers[i];
HeapTuple newtuple;
if (!TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(trigger->tgtype,
TRIGGER_TYPE_STATEMENT,
TRIGGER_TYPE_BEFORE,
TRIGGER_TYPE_TRUNCATE))
continue;
if (!TriggerEnabled(estate, relinfo, trigger, LocTriggerData.tg_event,
NULL, NULL, NULL))
continue;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigger = trigger;
newtuple = ExecCallTriggerFunc(&LocTriggerData,
i,
relinfo->ri_TrigFunctions,
relinfo->ri_TrigInstrument,
GetPerTupleMemoryContext(estate));
if (newtuple)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_E_R_I_E_TRIGGER_PROTOCOL_VIOLATED),
errmsg("BEFORE STATEMENT trigger cannot return a value")));
}
}
void
ExecASTruncateTriggers(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo)
{
TriggerDesc *trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc;
if (trigdesc && trigdesc->trig_truncate_after_statement)
AfterTriggerSaveEvent(estate, relinfo, TRIGGER_EVENT_TRUNCATE,
false, NULL, NULL, NIL, NULL, NULL);
}
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
static HeapTuple
GetTupleForTrigger(EState *estate,
EPQState *epqstate,
ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
ItemPointer tid,
Improve concurrency of foreign key locking This patch introduces two additional lock modes for tuples: "SELECT FOR KEY SHARE" and "SELECT FOR NO KEY UPDATE". These don't block each other, in contrast with already existing "SELECT FOR SHARE" and "SELECT FOR UPDATE". UPDATE commands that do not modify the values stored in the columns that are part of the key of the tuple now grab a SELECT FOR NO KEY UPDATE lock on the tuple, allowing them to proceed concurrently with tuple locks of the FOR KEY SHARE variety. Foreign key triggers now use FOR KEY SHARE instead of FOR SHARE; this means the concurrency improvement applies to them, which is the whole point of this patch. The added tuple lock semantics require some rejiggering of the multixact module, so that the locking level that each transaction is holding can be stored alongside its Xid. Also, multixacts now need to persist across server restarts and crashes, because they can now represent not only tuple locks, but also tuple updates. This means we need more careful tracking of lifetime of pg_multixact SLRU files; since they now persist longer, we require more infrastructure to figure out when they can be removed. pg_upgrade also needs to be careful to copy pg_multixact files over from the old server to the new, or at least part of multixact.c state, depending on the versions of the old and new servers. Tuple time qualification rules (HeapTupleSatisfies routines) need to be careful not to consider tuples with the "is multi" infomask bit set as being only locked; they might need to look up MultiXact values (i.e. possibly do pg_multixact I/O) to find out the Xid that updated a tuple, whereas they previously were assured to only use information readily available from the tuple header. This is considered acceptable, because the extra I/O would involve cases that would previously cause some commands to block waiting for concurrent transactions to finish. Another important change is the fact that locking tuples that have previously been updated causes the future versions to be marked as locked, too; this is essential for correctness of foreign key checks. This causes additional WAL-logging, also (there was previously a single WAL record for a locked tuple; now there are as many as updated copies of the tuple there exist.) With all this in place, contention related to tuples being checked by foreign key rules should be much reduced. As a bonus, the old behavior that a subtransaction grabbing a stronger tuple lock than the parent (sub)transaction held on a given tuple and later aborting caused the weaker lock to be lost, has been fixed. Many new spec files were added for isolation tester framework, to ensure overall behavior is sane. There's probably room for several more tests. There were several reviewers of this patch; in particular, Noah Misch and Andres Freund spent considerable time in it. Original idea for the patch came from Simon Riggs, after a problem report by Joel Jacobson. Most code is from me, with contributions from Marti Raudsepp, Alexander Shulgin, Noah Misch and Andres Freund. This patch was discussed in several pgsql-hackers threads; the most important start at the following message-ids: AANLkTimo9XVcEzfiBR-ut3KVNDkjm2Vxh+t8kAmWjPuv@mail.gmail.com 1290721684-sup-3951@alvh.no-ip.org 1294953201-sup-2099@alvh.no-ip.org 1320343602-sup-2290@alvh.no-ip.org 1339690386-sup-8927@alvh.no-ip.org 4FE5FF020200002500048A3D@gw.wicourts.gov 4FEAB90A0200002500048B7D@gw.wicourts.gov
2013-01-23 16:04:59 +01:00
LockTupleMode lockmode,
TupleTableSlot **newSlot)
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
{
Relation relation = relinfo->ri_RelationDesc;
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
HeapTupleData tuple;
HeapTuple result;
Buffer buffer;
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
if (newSlot != NULL)
{
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
HTSU_Result test;
HeapUpdateFailureData hufd;
*newSlot = NULL;
/* caller must pass an epqstate if EvalPlanQual is possible */
Assert(epqstate != NULL);
/*
* lock tuple for update
*/
ltrmark:;
tuple.t_self = *tid;
test = heap_lock_tuple(relation, &tuple,
estate->es_output_cid,
lockmode, LockWaitBlock,
Improve concurrency of foreign key locking This patch introduces two additional lock modes for tuples: "SELECT FOR KEY SHARE" and "SELECT FOR NO KEY UPDATE". These don't block each other, in contrast with already existing "SELECT FOR SHARE" and "SELECT FOR UPDATE". UPDATE commands that do not modify the values stored in the columns that are part of the key of the tuple now grab a SELECT FOR NO KEY UPDATE lock on the tuple, allowing them to proceed concurrently with tuple locks of the FOR KEY SHARE variety. Foreign key triggers now use FOR KEY SHARE instead of FOR SHARE; this means the concurrency improvement applies to them, which is the whole point of this patch. The added tuple lock semantics require some rejiggering of the multixact module, so that the locking level that each transaction is holding can be stored alongside its Xid. Also, multixacts now need to persist across server restarts and crashes, because they can now represent not only tuple locks, but also tuple updates. This means we need more careful tracking of lifetime of pg_multixact SLRU files; since they now persist longer, we require more infrastructure to figure out when they can be removed. pg_upgrade also needs to be careful to copy pg_multixact files over from the old server to the new, or at least part of multixact.c state, depending on the versions of the old and new servers. Tuple time qualification rules (HeapTupleSatisfies routines) need to be careful not to consider tuples with the "is multi" infomask bit set as being only locked; they might need to look up MultiXact values (i.e. possibly do pg_multixact I/O) to find out the Xid that updated a tuple, whereas they previously were assured to only use information readily available from the tuple header. This is considered acceptable, because the extra I/O would involve cases that would previously cause some commands to block waiting for concurrent transactions to finish. Another important change is the fact that locking tuples that have previously been updated causes the future versions to be marked as locked, too; this is essential for correctness of foreign key checks. This causes additional WAL-logging, also (there was previously a single WAL record for a locked tuple; now there are as many as updated copies of the tuple there exist.) With all this in place, contention related to tuples being checked by foreign key rules should be much reduced. As a bonus, the old behavior that a subtransaction grabbing a stronger tuple lock than the parent (sub)transaction held on a given tuple and later aborting caused the weaker lock to be lost, has been fixed. Many new spec files were added for isolation tester framework, to ensure overall behavior is sane. There's probably room for several more tests. There were several reviewers of this patch; in particular, Noah Misch and Andres Freund spent considerable time in it. Original idea for the patch came from Simon Riggs, after a problem report by Joel Jacobson. Most code is from me, with contributions from Marti Raudsepp, Alexander Shulgin, Noah Misch and Andres Freund. This patch was discussed in several pgsql-hackers threads; the most important start at the following message-ids: AANLkTimo9XVcEzfiBR-ut3KVNDkjm2Vxh+t8kAmWjPuv@mail.gmail.com 1290721684-sup-3951@alvh.no-ip.org 1294953201-sup-2099@alvh.no-ip.org 1320343602-sup-2290@alvh.no-ip.org 1339690386-sup-8927@alvh.no-ip.org 4FE5FF020200002500048A3D@gw.wicourts.gov 4FEAB90A0200002500048B7D@gw.wicourts.gov
2013-01-23 16:04:59 +01:00
false, &buffer, &hufd);
switch (test)
{
case HeapTupleSelfUpdated:
/*
* The target tuple was already updated or deleted by the
* current command, or by a later command in the current
* transaction. We ignore the tuple in the former case, and
* throw error in the latter case, for the same reasons
* enumerated in ExecUpdate and ExecDelete in
* nodeModifyTable.c.
*/
if (hufd.cmax != estate->es_output_cid)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_TRIGGERED_DATA_CHANGE_VIOLATION),
errmsg("tuple to be updated was already modified by an operation triggered by the current command"),
errhint("Consider using an AFTER trigger instead of a BEFORE trigger to propagate changes to other rows.")));
/* treat it as deleted; do not process */
ReleaseBuffer(buffer);
return NULL;
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
case HeapTupleMayBeUpdated:
break;
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
case HeapTupleUpdated:
ReleaseBuffer(buffer);
if (IsolationUsesXactSnapshot())
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_T_R_SERIALIZATION_FAILURE),
errmsg("could not serialize access due to concurrent update")));
if (!ItemPointerEquals(&hufd.ctid, &tuple.t_self))
{
/* it was updated, so look at the updated version */
TupleTableSlot *epqslot;
epqslot = EvalPlanQual(estate,
epqstate,
relation,
relinfo->ri_RangeTableIndex,
Improve concurrency of foreign key locking This patch introduces two additional lock modes for tuples: "SELECT FOR KEY SHARE" and "SELECT FOR NO KEY UPDATE". These don't block each other, in contrast with already existing "SELECT FOR SHARE" and "SELECT FOR UPDATE". UPDATE commands that do not modify the values stored in the columns that are part of the key of the tuple now grab a SELECT FOR NO KEY UPDATE lock on the tuple, allowing them to proceed concurrently with tuple locks of the FOR KEY SHARE variety. Foreign key triggers now use FOR KEY SHARE instead of FOR SHARE; this means the concurrency improvement applies to them, which is the whole point of this patch. The added tuple lock semantics require some rejiggering of the multixact module, so that the locking level that each transaction is holding can be stored alongside its Xid. Also, multixacts now need to persist across server restarts and crashes, because they can now represent not only tuple locks, but also tuple updates. This means we need more careful tracking of lifetime of pg_multixact SLRU files; since they now persist longer, we require more infrastructure to figure out when they can be removed. pg_upgrade also needs to be careful to copy pg_multixact files over from the old server to the new, or at least part of multixact.c state, depending on the versions of the old and new servers. Tuple time qualification rules (HeapTupleSatisfies routines) need to be careful not to consider tuples with the "is multi" infomask bit set as being only locked; they might need to look up MultiXact values (i.e. possibly do pg_multixact I/O) to find out the Xid that updated a tuple, whereas they previously were assured to only use information readily available from the tuple header. This is considered acceptable, because the extra I/O would involve cases that would previously cause some commands to block waiting for concurrent transactions to finish. Another important change is the fact that locking tuples that have previously been updated causes the future versions to be marked as locked, too; this is essential for correctness of foreign key checks. This causes additional WAL-logging, also (there was previously a single WAL record for a locked tuple; now there are as many as updated copies of the tuple there exist.) With all this in place, contention related to tuples being checked by foreign key rules should be much reduced. As a bonus, the old behavior that a subtransaction grabbing a stronger tuple lock than the parent (sub)transaction held on a given tuple and later aborting caused the weaker lock to be lost, has been fixed. Many new spec files were added for isolation tester framework, to ensure overall behavior is sane. There's probably room for several more tests. There were several reviewers of this patch; in particular, Noah Misch and Andres Freund spent considerable time in it. Original idea for the patch came from Simon Riggs, after a problem report by Joel Jacobson. Most code is from me, with contributions from Marti Raudsepp, Alexander Shulgin, Noah Misch and Andres Freund. This patch was discussed in several pgsql-hackers threads; the most important start at the following message-ids: AANLkTimo9XVcEzfiBR-ut3KVNDkjm2Vxh+t8kAmWjPuv@mail.gmail.com 1290721684-sup-3951@alvh.no-ip.org 1294953201-sup-2099@alvh.no-ip.org 1320343602-sup-2290@alvh.no-ip.org 1339690386-sup-8927@alvh.no-ip.org 4FE5FF020200002500048A3D@gw.wicourts.gov 4FEAB90A0200002500048B7D@gw.wicourts.gov
2013-01-23 16:04:59 +01:00
lockmode,
&hufd.ctid,
hufd.xmax);
if (!TupIsNull(epqslot))
{
*tid = hufd.ctid;
*newSlot = epqslot;
/*
* EvalPlanQual already locked the tuple, but we
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
* re-call heap_lock_tuple anyway as an easy way of
* re-fetching the correct tuple. Speed is hardly a
* criterion in this path anyhow.
*/
goto ltrmark;
}
}
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* if tuple was deleted or PlanQual failed for updated tuple -
* we must not process this tuple!
*/
return NULL;
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
Add support for INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING/UPDATE. The newly added ON CONFLICT clause allows to specify an alternative to raising a unique or exclusion constraint violation error when inserting. ON CONFLICT refers to constraints that can either be specified using a inference clause (by specifying the columns of a unique constraint) or by naming a unique or exclusion constraint. DO NOTHING avoids the constraint violation, without touching the pre-existing row. DO UPDATE SET ... [WHERE ...] updates the pre-existing tuple, and has access to both the tuple proposed for insertion and the existing tuple; the optional WHERE clause can be used to prevent an update from being executed. The UPDATE SET and WHERE clauses have access to the tuple proposed for insertion using the "magic" EXCLUDED alias, and to the pre-existing tuple using the table name or its alias. This feature is often referred to as upsert. This is implemented using a new infrastructure called "speculative insertion". It is an optimistic variant of regular insertion that first does a pre-check for existing tuples and then attempts an insert. If a violating tuple was inserted concurrently, the speculatively inserted tuple is deleted and a new attempt is made. If the pre-check finds a matching tuple the alternative DO NOTHING or DO UPDATE action is taken. If the insertion succeeds without detecting a conflict, the tuple is deemed inserted. To handle the possible ambiguity between the excluded alias and a table named excluded, and for convenience with long relation names, INSERT INTO now can alias its target table. Bumps catversion as stored rules change. Author: Peter Geoghegan, with significant contributions from Heikki Linnakangas and Andres Freund. Testing infrastructure by Jeff Janes. Reviewed-By: Heikki Linnakangas, Andres Freund, Robert Haas, Simon Riggs, Dean Rasheed, Stephen Frost and many others.
2015-05-08 05:31:36 +02:00
case HeapTupleInvisible:
elog(ERROR, "attempted to lock invisible tuple");
default:
ReleaseBuffer(buffer);
elog(ERROR, "unrecognized heap_lock_tuple status: %u", test);
return NULL; /* keep compiler quiet */
}
}
else
{
Page page;
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
ItemId lp;
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
buffer = ReadBuffer(relation, ItemPointerGetBlockNumber(tid));
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
/*
* Although we already know this tuple is valid, we must lock the
* buffer to ensure that no one has a buffer cleanup lock; otherwise
* they might move the tuple while we try to copy it. But we can
* release the lock before actually doing the heap_copytuple call,
* since holding pin is sufficient to prevent anyone from getting a
* cleanup lock they don't already hold.
*/
LockBuffer(buffer, BUFFER_LOCK_SHARE);
page = BufferGetPage(buffer);
lp = PageGetItemId(page, ItemPointerGetOffsetNumber(tid));
Assert(ItemIdIsNormal(lp));
tuple.t_data = (HeapTupleHeader) PageGetItem(page, lp);
tuple.t_len = ItemIdGetLength(lp);
tuple.t_self = *tid;
tuple.t_tableOid = RelationGetRelid(relation);
LockBuffer(buffer, BUFFER_LOCK_UNLOCK);
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
}
1998-11-27 20:52:36 +01:00
result = heap_copytuple(&tuple);
ReleaseBuffer(buffer);
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
1998-11-27 20:52:36 +01:00
return result;
1997-09-11 09:24:37 +02:00
}
/*
* Is trigger enabled to fire?
*/
static bool
TriggerEnabled(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
Trigger *trigger, TriggerEvent event,
Bitmapset *modifiedCols,
HeapTuple oldtup, HeapTuple newtup)
{
/* Check replication-role-dependent enable state */
if (SessionReplicationRole == SESSION_REPLICATION_ROLE_REPLICA)
{
if (trigger->tgenabled == TRIGGER_FIRES_ON_ORIGIN ||
trigger->tgenabled == TRIGGER_DISABLED)
return false;
}
2017-06-21 20:39:04 +02:00
else /* ORIGIN or LOCAL role */
{
if (trigger->tgenabled == TRIGGER_FIRES_ON_REPLICA ||
trigger->tgenabled == TRIGGER_DISABLED)
return false;
}
/*
* Check for column-specific trigger (only possible for UPDATE, and in
* fact we *must* ignore tgattr for other event types)
*/
if (trigger->tgnattr > 0 && TRIGGER_FIRED_BY_UPDATE(event))
{
int i;
bool modified;
modified = false;
for (i = 0; i < trigger->tgnattr; i++)
{
if (bms_is_member(trigger->tgattr[i] - FirstLowInvalidHeapAttributeNumber,
modifiedCols))
{
modified = true;
break;
}
}
if (!modified)
return false;
}
/* Check for WHEN clause */
if (trigger->tgqual)
{
TupleDesc tupdesc = RelationGetDescr(relinfo->ri_RelationDesc);
Faster expression evaluation and targetlist projection. This replaces the old, recursive tree-walk based evaluation, with non-recursive, opcode dispatch based, expression evaluation. Projection is now implemented as part of expression evaluation. This both leads to significant performance improvements, and makes future just-in-time compilation of expressions easier. The speed gains primarily come from: - non-recursive implementation reduces stack usage / overhead - simple sub-expressions are implemented with a single jump, without function calls - sharing some state between different sub-expressions - reduced amount of indirect/hard to predict memory accesses by laying out operation metadata sequentially; including the avoidance of nearly all of the previously used linked lists - more code has been moved to expression initialization, avoiding constant re-checks at evaluation time Future just-in-time compilation (JIT) has become easier, as demonstrated by released patches intended to be merged in a later release, for primarily two reasons: Firstly, due to a stricter split between expression initialization and evaluation, less code has to be handled by the JIT. Secondly, due to the non-recursive nature of the generated "instructions", less performance-critical code-paths can easily be shared between interpreted and compiled evaluation. The new framework allows for significant future optimizations. E.g.: - basic infrastructure for to later reduce the per executor-startup overhead of expression evaluation, by caching state in prepared statements. That'd be helpful in OLTPish scenarios where initialization overhead is measurable. - optimizing the generated "code". A number of proposals for potential work has already been made. - optimizing the interpreter. Similarly a number of proposals have been made here too. The move of logic into the expression initialization step leads to some backward-incompatible changes: - Function permission checks are now done during expression initialization, whereas previously they were done during execution. In edge cases this can lead to errors being raised that previously wouldn't have been, e.g. a NULL array being coerced to a different array type previously didn't perform checks. - The set of domain constraints to be checked, is now evaluated once during expression initialization, previously it was re-built every time a domain check was evaluated. For normal queries this doesn't change much, but e.g. for plpgsql functions, which caches ExprStates, the old set could stick around longer. The behavior around might still change. Author: Andres Freund, with significant changes by Tom Lane, changes by Heikki Linnakangas Reviewed-By: Tom Lane, Heikki Linnakangas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20161206034955.bh33paeralxbtluv@alap3.anarazel.de
2017-03-14 23:45:36 +01:00
ExprState **predicate;
ExprContext *econtext;
TupleTableSlot *oldslot = NULL;
TupleTableSlot *newslot = NULL;
MemoryContext oldContext;
int i;
Assert(estate != NULL);
/*
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
* trigger is an element of relinfo->ri_TrigDesc->triggers[]; find the
* matching element of relinfo->ri_TrigWhenExprs[]
*/
i = trigger - relinfo->ri_TrigDesc->triggers;
predicate = &relinfo->ri_TrigWhenExprs[i];
/*
* If first time through for this WHEN expression, build expression
* nodetrees for it. Keep them in the per-query memory context so
* they'll survive throughout the query.
*/
Faster expression evaluation and targetlist projection. This replaces the old, recursive tree-walk based evaluation, with non-recursive, opcode dispatch based, expression evaluation. Projection is now implemented as part of expression evaluation. This both leads to significant performance improvements, and makes future just-in-time compilation of expressions easier. The speed gains primarily come from: - non-recursive implementation reduces stack usage / overhead - simple sub-expressions are implemented with a single jump, without function calls - sharing some state between different sub-expressions - reduced amount of indirect/hard to predict memory accesses by laying out operation metadata sequentially; including the avoidance of nearly all of the previously used linked lists - more code has been moved to expression initialization, avoiding constant re-checks at evaluation time Future just-in-time compilation (JIT) has become easier, as demonstrated by released patches intended to be merged in a later release, for primarily two reasons: Firstly, due to a stricter split between expression initialization and evaluation, less code has to be handled by the JIT. Secondly, due to the non-recursive nature of the generated "instructions", less performance-critical code-paths can easily be shared between interpreted and compiled evaluation. The new framework allows for significant future optimizations. E.g.: - basic infrastructure for to later reduce the per executor-startup overhead of expression evaluation, by caching state in prepared statements. That'd be helpful in OLTPish scenarios where initialization overhead is measurable. - optimizing the generated "code". A number of proposals for potential work has already been made. - optimizing the interpreter. Similarly a number of proposals have been made here too. The move of logic into the expression initialization step leads to some backward-incompatible changes: - Function permission checks are now done during expression initialization, whereas previously they were done during execution. In edge cases this can lead to errors being raised that previously wouldn't have been, e.g. a NULL array being coerced to a different array type previously didn't perform checks. - The set of domain constraints to be checked, is now evaluated once during expression initialization, previously it was re-built every time a domain check was evaluated. For normal queries this doesn't change much, but e.g. for plpgsql functions, which caches ExprStates, the old set could stick around longer. The behavior around might still change. Author: Andres Freund, with significant changes by Tom Lane, changes by Heikki Linnakangas Reviewed-By: Tom Lane, Heikki Linnakangas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20161206034955.bh33paeralxbtluv@alap3.anarazel.de
2017-03-14 23:45:36 +01:00
if (*predicate == NULL)
{
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
Node *tgqual;
oldContext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(estate->es_query_cxt);
tgqual = stringToNode(trigger->tgqual);
/* Change references to OLD and NEW to INNER_VAR and OUTER_VAR */
ChangeVarNodes(tgqual, PRS2_OLD_VARNO, INNER_VAR, 0);
ChangeVarNodes(tgqual, PRS2_NEW_VARNO, OUTER_VAR, 0);
Faster expression evaluation and targetlist projection. This replaces the old, recursive tree-walk based evaluation, with non-recursive, opcode dispatch based, expression evaluation. Projection is now implemented as part of expression evaluation. This both leads to significant performance improvements, and makes future just-in-time compilation of expressions easier. The speed gains primarily come from: - non-recursive implementation reduces stack usage / overhead - simple sub-expressions are implemented with a single jump, without function calls - sharing some state between different sub-expressions - reduced amount of indirect/hard to predict memory accesses by laying out operation metadata sequentially; including the avoidance of nearly all of the previously used linked lists - more code has been moved to expression initialization, avoiding constant re-checks at evaluation time Future just-in-time compilation (JIT) has become easier, as demonstrated by released patches intended to be merged in a later release, for primarily two reasons: Firstly, due to a stricter split between expression initialization and evaluation, less code has to be handled by the JIT. Secondly, due to the non-recursive nature of the generated "instructions", less performance-critical code-paths can easily be shared between interpreted and compiled evaluation. The new framework allows for significant future optimizations. E.g.: - basic infrastructure for to later reduce the per executor-startup overhead of expression evaluation, by caching state in prepared statements. That'd be helpful in OLTPish scenarios where initialization overhead is measurable. - optimizing the generated "code". A number of proposals for potential work has already been made. - optimizing the interpreter. Similarly a number of proposals have been made here too. The move of logic into the expression initialization step leads to some backward-incompatible changes: - Function permission checks are now done during expression initialization, whereas previously they were done during execution. In edge cases this can lead to errors being raised that previously wouldn't have been, e.g. a NULL array being coerced to a different array type previously didn't perform checks. - The set of domain constraints to be checked, is now evaluated once during expression initialization, previously it was re-built every time a domain check was evaluated. For normal queries this doesn't change much, but e.g. for plpgsql functions, which caches ExprStates, the old set could stick around longer. The behavior around might still change. Author: Andres Freund, with significant changes by Tom Lane, changes by Heikki Linnakangas Reviewed-By: Tom Lane, Heikki Linnakangas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20161206034955.bh33paeralxbtluv@alap3.anarazel.de
2017-03-14 23:45:36 +01:00
/* ExecPrepareQual wants implicit-AND form */
tgqual = (Node *) make_ands_implicit((Expr *) tgqual);
Faster expression evaluation and targetlist projection. This replaces the old, recursive tree-walk based evaluation, with non-recursive, opcode dispatch based, expression evaluation. Projection is now implemented as part of expression evaluation. This both leads to significant performance improvements, and makes future just-in-time compilation of expressions easier. The speed gains primarily come from: - non-recursive implementation reduces stack usage / overhead - simple sub-expressions are implemented with a single jump, without function calls - sharing some state between different sub-expressions - reduced amount of indirect/hard to predict memory accesses by laying out operation metadata sequentially; including the avoidance of nearly all of the previously used linked lists - more code has been moved to expression initialization, avoiding constant re-checks at evaluation time Future just-in-time compilation (JIT) has become easier, as demonstrated by released patches intended to be merged in a later release, for primarily two reasons: Firstly, due to a stricter split between expression initialization and evaluation, less code has to be handled by the JIT. Secondly, due to the non-recursive nature of the generated "instructions", less performance-critical code-paths can easily be shared between interpreted and compiled evaluation. The new framework allows for significant future optimizations. E.g.: - basic infrastructure for to later reduce the per executor-startup overhead of expression evaluation, by caching state in prepared statements. That'd be helpful in OLTPish scenarios where initialization overhead is measurable. - optimizing the generated "code". A number of proposals for potential work has already been made. - optimizing the interpreter. Similarly a number of proposals have been made here too. The move of logic into the expression initialization step leads to some backward-incompatible changes: - Function permission checks are now done during expression initialization, whereas previously they were done during execution. In edge cases this can lead to errors being raised that previously wouldn't have been, e.g. a NULL array being coerced to a different array type previously didn't perform checks. - The set of domain constraints to be checked, is now evaluated once during expression initialization, previously it was re-built every time a domain check was evaluated. For normal queries this doesn't change much, but e.g. for plpgsql functions, which caches ExprStates, the old set could stick around longer. The behavior around might still change. Author: Andres Freund, with significant changes by Tom Lane, changes by Heikki Linnakangas Reviewed-By: Tom Lane, Heikki Linnakangas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20161206034955.bh33paeralxbtluv@alap3.anarazel.de
2017-03-14 23:45:36 +01:00
*predicate = ExecPrepareQual((List *) tgqual, estate);
MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldContext);
}
/*
* We will use the EState's per-tuple context for evaluating WHEN
* expressions (creating it if it's not already there).
*/
econtext = GetPerTupleExprContext(estate);
/*
* Put OLD and NEW tuples into tupleslots for expression evaluation.
* These slots can be shared across the whole estate, but be careful
* that they have the current resultrel's tupdesc.
*/
if (HeapTupleIsValid(oldtup))
{
if (estate->es_trig_oldtup_slot == NULL)
{
oldContext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(estate->es_query_cxt);
estate->es_trig_oldtup_slot = ExecInitExtraTupleSlot(estate);
MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldContext);
}
oldslot = estate->es_trig_oldtup_slot;
if (oldslot->tts_tupleDescriptor != tupdesc)
ExecSetSlotDescriptor(oldslot, tupdesc);
ExecStoreTuple(oldtup, oldslot, InvalidBuffer, false);
}
if (HeapTupleIsValid(newtup))
{
if (estate->es_trig_newtup_slot == NULL)
{
oldContext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(estate->es_query_cxt);
estate->es_trig_newtup_slot = ExecInitExtraTupleSlot(estate);
MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldContext);
}
newslot = estate->es_trig_newtup_slot;
if (newslot->tts_tupleDescriptor != tupdesc)
ExecSetSlotDescriptor(newslot, tupdesc);
ExecStoreTuple(newtup, newslot, InvalidBuffer, false);
}
/*
* Finally evaluate the expression, making the old and/or new tuples
* available as INNER_VAR/OUTER_VAR respectively.
*/
econtext->ecxt_innertuple = oldslot;
econtext->ecxt_outertuple = newslot;
Faster expression evaluation and targetlist projection. This replaces the old, recursive tree-walk based evaluation, with non-recursive, opcode dispatch based, expression evaluation. Projection is now implemented as part of expression evaluation. This both leads to significant performance improvements, and makes future just-in-time compilation of expressions easier. The speed gains primarily come from: - non-recursive implementation reduces stack usage / overhead - simple sub-expressions are implemented with a single jump, without function calls - sharing some state between different sub-expressions - reduced amount of indirect/hard to predict memory accesses by laying out operation metadata sequentially; including the avoidance of nearly all of the previously used linked lists - more code has been moved to expression initialization, avoiding constant re-checks at evaluation time Future just-in-time compilation (JIT) has become easier, as demonstrated by released patches intended to be merged in a later release, for primarily two reasons: Firstly, due to a stricter split between expression initialization and evaluation, less code has to be handled by the JIT. Secondly, due to the non-recursive nature of the generated "instructions", less performance-critical code-paths can easily be shared between interpreted and compiled evaluation. The new framework allows for significant future optimizations. E.g.: - basic infrastructure for to later reduce the per executor-startup overhead of expression evaluation, by caching state in prepared statements. That'd be helpful in OLTPish scenarios where initialization overhead is measurable. - optimizing the generated "code". A number of proposals for potential work has already been made. - optimizing the interpreter. Similarly a number of proposals have been made here too. The move of logic into the expression initialization step leads to some backward-incompatible changes: - Function permission checks are now done during expression initialization, whereas previously they were done during execution. In edge cases this can lead to errors being raised that previously wouldn't have been, e.g. a NULL array being coerced to a different array type previously didn't perform checks. - The set of domain constraints to be checked, is now evaluated once during expression initialization, previously it was re-built every time a domain check was evaluated. For normal queries this doesn't change much, but e.g. for plpgsql functions, which caches ExprStates, the old set could stick around longer. The behavior around might still change. Author: Andres Freund, with significant changes by Tom Lane, changes by Heikki Linnakangas Reviewed-By: Tom Lane, Heikki Linnakangas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20161206034955.bh33paeralxbtluv@alap3.anarazel.de
2017-03-14 23:45:36 +01:00
if (!ExecQual(*predicate, econtext))
return false;
}
return true;
}
/* ----------
* After-trigger stuff
*
* The AfterTriggersData struct holds data about pending AFTER trigger events
* during the current transaction tree. (BEFORE triggers are fired
* immediately so we don't need any persistent state about them.) The struct
* and most of its subsidiary data are kept in TopTransactionContext; however
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* some data that can be discarded sooner appears in the CurTransactionContext
* of the relevant subtransaction. Also, the individual event records are
* kept in a separate sub-context of TopTransactionContext. This is done
* mainly so that it's easy to tell from a memory context dump how much space
* is being eaten by trigger events.
*
* Because the list of pending events can grow large, we go to some
* considerable effort to minimize per-event memory consumption. The event
* records are grouped into chunks and common data for similar events in the
* same chunk is only stored once.
*
* XXX We need to be able to save the per-event data in a file if it grows too
* large.
* ----------
*/
/* Per-trigger SET CONSTRAINT status */
typedef struct SetConstraintTriggerData
{
Oid sct_tgoid;
bool sct_tgisdeferred;
} SetConstraintTriggerData;
typedef struct SetConstraintTriggerData *SetConstraintTrigger;
/*
* SET CONSTRAINT intra-transaction status.
*
* We make this a single palloc'd object so it can be copied and freed easily.
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
*
* all_isset and all_isdeferred are used to keep track
* of SET CONSTRAINTS ALL {DEFERRED, IMMEDIATE}.
*
* trigstates[] stores per-trigger tgisdeferred settings.
*/
typedef struct SetConstraintStateData
{
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
bool all_isset;
bool all_isdeferred;
int numstates; /* number of trigstates[] entries in use */
int numalloc; /* allocated size of trigstates[] */
SetConstraintTriggerData trigstates[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER];
} SetConstraintStateData;
typedef SetConstraintStateData *SetConstraintState;
/*
* Per-trigger-event data
*
* The actual per-event data, AfterTriggerEventData, includes DONE/IN_PROGRESS
* status bits and up to two tuple CTIDs. Each event record also has an
* associated AfterTriggerSharedData that is shared across all instances of
* similar events within a "chunk".
*
* For row-level triggers, we arrange not to waste storage on unneeded ctid
* fields. Updates of regular tables use two; inserts and deletes of regular
* tables use one; foreign tables always use zero and save the tuple(s) to a
* tuplestore. AFTER_TRIGGER_FDW_FETCH directs AfterTriggerExecute() to
* retrieve a fresh tuple or pair of tuples from that tuplestore, while
* AFTER_TRIGGER_FDW_REUSE directs it to use the most-recently-retrieved
* tuple(s). This permits storing tuples once regardless of the number of
* row-level triggers on a foreign table.
*
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* Note that we need triggers on foreign tables to be fired in exactly the
* order they were queued, so that the tuples come out of the tuplestore in
* the right order. To ensure that, we forbid deferrable (constraint)
* triggers on foreign tables. This also ensures that such triggers do not
* get deferred into outer trigger query levels, meaning that it's okay to
* destroy the tuplestore at the end of the query level.
*
* Statement-level triggers always bear AFTER_TRIGGER_1CTID, though they
* require no ctid field. We lack the flag bit space to neatly represent that
* distinct case, and it seems unlikely to be worth much trouble.
*
* Note: ats_firing_id is initially zero and is set to something else when
* AFTER_TRIGGER_IN_PROGRESS is set. It indicates which trigger firing
* cycle the trigger will be fired in (or was fired in, if DONE is set).
* Although this is mutable state, we can keep it in AfterTriggerSharedData
* because all instances of the same type of event in a given event list will
* be fired at the same time, if they were queued between the same firing
* cycles. So we need only ensure that ats_firing_id is zero when attaching
* a new event to an existing AfterTriggerSharedData record.
*/
typedef uint32 TriggerFlags;
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
#define AFTER_TRIGGER_OFFSET 0x0FFFFFFF /* must be low-order bits */
#define AFTER_TRIGGER_DONE 0x10000000
#define AFTER_TRIGGER_IN_PROGRESS 0x20000000
/* bits describing the size and tuple sources of this event */
#define AFTER_TRIGGER_FDW_REUSE 0x00000000
#define AFTER_TRIGGER_FDW_FETCH 0x80000000
#define AFTER_TRIGGER_1CTID 0x40000000
#define AFTER_TRIGGER_2CTID 0xC0000000
#define AFTER_TRIGGER_TUP_BITS 0xC0000000
typedef struct AfterTriggerSharedData *AfterTriggerShared;
typedef struct AfterTriggerSharedData
{
TriggerEvent ats_event; /* event type indicator, see trigger.h */
Oid ats_tgoid; /* the trigger's ID */
Oid ats_relid; /* the relation it's on */
CommandId ats_firing_id; /* ID for firing cycle */
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
struct AfterTriggersTableData *ats_table; /* transition table access */
} AfterTriggerSharedData;
typedef struct AfterTriggerEventData *AfterTriggerEvent;
typedef struct AfterTriggerEventData
{
TriggerFlags ate_flags; /* status bits and offset to shared data */
ItemPointerData ate_ctid1; /* inserted, deleted, or old updated tuple */
ItemPointerData ate_ctid2; /* new updated tuple */
} AfterTriggerEventData;
/* AfterTriggerEventData, minus ate_ctid2 */
typedef struct AfterTriggerEventDataOneCtid
{
TriggerFlags ate_flags; /* status bits and offset to shared data */
ItemPointerData ate_ctid1; /* inserted, deleted, or old updated tuple */
2017-06-21 20:39:04 +02:00
} AfterTriggerEventDataOneCtid;
/* AfterTriggerEventData, minus ate_ctid1 and ate_ctid2 */
typedef struct AfterTriggerEventDataZeroCtids
{
TriggerFlags ate_flags; /* status bits and offset to shared data */
2017-06-21 20:39:04 +02:00
} AfterTriggerEventDataZeroCtids;
#define SizeofTriggerEvent(evt) \
(((evt)->ate_flags & AFTER_TRIGGER_TUP_BITS) == AFTER_TRIGGER_2CTID ? \
sizeof(AfterTriggerEventData) : \
((evt)->ate_flags & AFTER_TRIGGER_TUP_BITS) == AFTER_TRIGGER_1CTID ? \
sizeof(AfterTriggerEventDataOneCtid) : \
sizeof(AfterTriggerEventDataZeroCtids))
#define GetTriggerSharedData(evt) \
((AfterTriggerShared) ((char *) (evt) + ((evt)->ate_flags & AFTER_TRIGGER_OFFSET)))
/*
* To avoid palloc overhead, we keep trigger events in arrays in successively-
* larger chunks (a slightly more sophisticated version of an expansible
* array). The space between CHUNK_DATA_START and freeptr is occupied by
* AfterTriggerEventData records; the space between endfree and endptr is
* occupied by AfterTriggerSharedData records.
*/
typedef struct AfterTriggerEventChunk
{
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
struct AfterTriggerEventChunk *next; /* list link */
char *freeptr; /* start of free space in chunk */
char *endfree; /* end of free space in chunk */
char *endptr; /* end of chunk */
/* event data follows here */
} AfterTriggerEventChunk;
#define CHUNK_DATA_START(cptr) ((char *) (cptr) + MAXALIGN(sizeof(AfterTriggerEventChunk)))
/* A list of events */
typedef struct AfterTriggerEventList
{
AfterTriggerEventChunk *head;
AfterTriggerEventChunk *tail;
char *tailfree; /* freeptr of tail chunk */
} AfterTriggerEventList;
/* Macros to help in iterating over a list of events */
#define for_each_chunk(cptr, evtlist) \
for (cptr = (evtlist).head; cptr != NULL; cptr = cptr->next)
#define for_each_event(eptr, cptr) \
for (eptr = (AfterTriggerEvent) CHUNK_DATA_START(cptr); \
(char *) eptr < (cptr)->freeptr; \
eptr = (AfterTriggerEvent) (((char *) eptr) + SizeofTriggerEvent(eptr)))
/* Use this if no special per-chunk processing is needed */
#define for_each_event_chunk(eptr, cptr, evtlist) \
for_each_chunk(cptr, evtlist) for_each_event(eptr, cptr)
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
/* Macros for iterating from a start point that might not be list start */
#define for_each_chunk_from(cptr) \
for (; cptr != NULL; cptr = cptr->next)
#define for_each_event_from(eptr, cptr) \
for (; \
(char *) eptr < (cptr)->freeptr; \
eptr = (AfterTriggerEvent) (((char *) eptr) + SizeofTriggerEvent(eptr)))
/*
* All per-transaction data for the AFTER TRIGGERS module.
*
* AfterTriggersData has the following fields:
*
* firing_counter is incremented for each call of afterTriggerInvokeEvents.
* We mark firable events with the current firing cycle's ID so that we can
* tell which ones to work on. This ensures sane behavior if a trigger
* function chooses to do SET CONSTRAINTS: the inner SET CONSTRAINTS will
* only fire those events that weren't already scheduled for firing.
*
* state keeps track of the transaction-local effects of SET CONSTRAINTS.
* This is saved and restored across failed subtransactions.
*
* events is the current list of deferred events. This is global across
* all subtransactions of the current transaction. In a subtransaction
* abort, we know that the events added by the subtransaction are at the
* end of the list, so it is relatively easy to discard them. The event
* list chunks themselves are stored in event_cxt.
*
* query_depth is the current depth of nested AfterTriggerBeginQuery calls
* (-1 when the stack is empty).
*
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* query_stack[query_depth] is the per-query-level data, including these fields:
*
* events is a list of AFTER trigger events queued by the current query.
* None of these are valid until the matching AfterTriggerEndQuery call
* occurs. At that point we fire immediate-mode triggers, and append any
* deferred events to the main events list.
*
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* fdw_tuplestore is a tuplestore containing the foreign-table tuples
* needed by events queued by the current query. (Note: we use just one
* tuplestore even though more than one foreign table might be involved.
* This is okay because tuplestores don't really care what's in the tuples
* they store; but it's possible that someday it'd break.)
*
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* tables is a List of AfterTriggersTableData structs for target tables
* of the current query (see below).
*
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* maxquerydepth is just the allocated length of query_stack.
*
* trans_stack holds per-subtransaction data, including these fields:
*
* state is NULL or a pointer to a saved copy of the SET CONSTRAINTS
* state data. Each subtransaction level that modifies that state first
* saves a copy, which we use to restore the state if we abort.
*
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* events is a copy of the events head/tail pointers,
* which we use to restore those values during subtransaction abort.
*
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* query_depth is the subtransaction-start-time value of query_depth,
* which we similarly use to clean up at subtransaction abort.
*
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* firing_counter is the subtransaction-start-time value of firing_counter.
* We use this to recognize which deferred triggers were fired (or marked
* for firing) within an aborted subtransaction.
*
* We use GetCurrentTransactionNestLevel() to determine the correct array
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* index in trans_stack. maxtransdepth is the number of allocated entries in
* trans_stack. (By not keeping our own stack pointer, we can avoid trouble
* in cases where errors during subxact abort cause multiple invocations
* of AfterTriggerEndSubXact() at the same nesting depth.)
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
*
* We create an AfterTriggersTableData struct for each target table of the
* current query, and each operation mode (INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE), that has
* either transition tables or statement-level triggers. This is used to
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* hold the relevant transition tables, as well as info tracking whether
* we already queued the statement triggers. (We use that info to prevent
* firing the same statement triggers more than once per statement, or really
* once per transition table set.) These structs, along with the transition
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* table tuplestores, live in the (sub)transaction's CurTransactionContext.
* That's sufficient lifespan because we don't allow transition tables to be
* used by deferrable triggers, so they only need to survive until
* AfterTriggerEndQuery.
*/
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
typedef struct AfterTriggersQueryData AfterTriggersQueryData;
typedef struct AfterTriggersTransData AfterTriggersTransData;
typedef struct AfterTriggersTableData AfterTriggersTableData;
typedef struct AfterTriggersData
{
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
CommandId firing_counter; /* next firing ID to assign */
SetConstraintState state; /* the active S C state */
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
AfterTriggerEventList events; /* deferred-event list */
MemoryContext event_cxt; /* memory context for events, if any */
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
/* per-query-level data: */
AfterTriggersQueryData *query_stack; /* array of structs shown below */
int query_depth; /* current index in above array */
int maxquerydepth; /* allocated len of above array */
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
/* per-subtransaction-level data: */
AfterTriggersTransData *trans_stack; /* array of structs shown below */
int maxtransdepth; /* allocated len of above array */
} AfterTriggersData;
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
struct AfterTriggersQueryData
{
AfterTriggerEventList events; /* events pending from this query */
Tuplestorestate *fdw_tuplestore; /* foreign tuples for said events */
List *tables; /* list of AfterTriggersTableData, see below */
};
struct AfterTriggersTransData
{
/* these fields are just for resetting at subtrans abort: */
SetConstraintState state; /* saved S C state, or NULL if not yet saved */
AfterTriggerEventList events; /* saved list pointer */
int query_depth; /* saved query_depth */
CommandId firing_counter; /* saved firing_counter */
};
struct AfterTriggersTableData
{
/* relid + cmdType form the lookup key for these structs: */
Oid relid; /* target table's OID */
CmdType cmdType; /* event type, CMD_INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE */
bool closed; /* true when no longer OK to add tuples */
bool before_trig_done; /* did we already queue BS triggers? */
bool after_trig_done; /* did we already queue AS triggers? */
AfterTriggerEventList after_trig_events; /* if so, saved list pointer */
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
Tuplestorestate *old_tuplestore; /* "old" transition table, if any */
Tuplestorestate *new_tuplestore; /* "new" transition table, if any */
};
static AfterTriggersData afterTriggers;
static void AfterTriggerExecute(AfterTriggerEvent event,
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
Relation rel, TriggerDesc *trigdesc,
FmgrInfo *finfo,
Instrumentation *instr,
MemoryContext per_tuple_context,
TupleTableSlot *trig_tuple_slot1,
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
TupleTableSlot *trig_tuple_slot2);
static AfterTriggersTableData *GetAfterTriggersTableData(Oid relid,
CmdType cmdType);
static void AfterTriggerFreeQuery(AfterTriggersQueryData *qs);
static SetConstraintState SetConstraintStateCreate(int numalloc);
static SetConstraintState SetConstraintStateCopy(SetConstraintState state);
static SetConstraintState SetConstraintStateAddItem(SetConstraintState state,
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
Oid tgoid, bool tgisdeferred);
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
static void cancel_prior_stmt_triggers(Oid relid, CmdType cmdType, int tgevent);
/*
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* Get the FDW tuplestore for the current trigger query level, creating it
* if necessary.
*/
static Tuplestorestate *
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
GetCurrentFDWTuplestore(void)
{
Tuplestorestate *ret;
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
ret = afterTriggers.query_stack[afterTriggers.query_depth].fdw_tuplestore;
if (ret == NULL)
{
MemoryContext oldcxt;
ResourceOwner saveResourceOwner;
/*
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* Make the tuplestore valid until end of subtransaction. We really
* only need it until AfterTriggerEndQuery().
*/
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
oldcxt = MemoryContextSwitchTo(CurTransactionContext);
saveResourceOwner = CurrentResourceOwner;
CurrentResourceOwner = CurTransactionResourceOwner;
ret = tuplestore_begin_heap(false, false, work_mem);
CurrentResourceOwner = saveResourceOwner;
MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcxt);
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
afterTriggers.query_stack[afterTriggers.query_depth].fdw_tuplestore = ret;
}
return ret;
}
/* ----------
* afterTriggerCheckState()
*
* Returns true if the trigger event is actually in state DEFERRED.
* ----------
*/
static bool
afterTriggerCheckState(AfterTriggerShared evtshared)
{
Oid tgoid = evtshared->ats_tgoid;
SetConstraintState state = afterTriggers.state;
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
int i;
/*
* For not-deferrable triggers (i.e. normal AFTER ROW triggers and
* constraints declared NOT DEFERRABLE), the state is always false.
*/
if ((evtshared->ats_event & AFTER_TRIGGER_DEFERRABLE) == 0)
return false;
/*
* If constraint state exists, SET CONSTRAINTS might have been executed
* either for this trigger or for all triggers.
*/
if (state != NULL)
{
/* Check for SET CONSTRAINTS for this specific trigger. */
for (i = 0; i < state->numstates; i++)
{
if (state->trigstates[i].sct_tgoid == tgoid)
return state->trigstates[i].sct_tgisdeferred;
}
/* Check for SET CONSTRAINTS ALL. */
if (state->all_isset)
return state->all_isdeferred;
}
/*
* Otherwise return the default state for the trigger.
*/
return ((evtshared->ats_event & AFTER_TRIGGER_INITDEFERRED) != 0);
}
/* ----------
* afterTriggerAddEvent()
*
* Add a new trigger event to the specified queue.
* The passed-in event data is copied.
* ----------
*/
static void
afterTriggerAddEvent(AfterTriggerEventList *events,
AfterTriggerEvent event, AfterTriggerShared evtshared)
{
Size eventsize = SizeofTriggerEvent(event);
Size needed = eventsize + sizeof(AfterTriggerSharedData);
AfterTriggerEventChunk *chunk;
AfterTriggerShared newshared;
AfterTriggerEvent newevent;
/*
* If empty list or not enough room in the tail chunk, make a new chunk.
* We assume here that a new shared record will always be needed.
*/
chunk = events->tail;
if (chunk == NULL ||
chunk->endfree - chunk->freeptr < needed)
{
Size chunksize;
/* Create event context if we didn't already */
if (afterTriggers.event_cxt == NULL)
afterTriggers.event_cxt =
AllocSetContextCreate(TopTransactionContext,
"AfterTriggerEvents",
Add macros to make AllocSetContextCreate() calls simpler and safer. I found that half a dozen (nearly 5%) of our AllocSetContextCreate calls had typos in the context-sizing parameters. While none of these led to especially significant problems, they did create minor inefficiencies, and it's now clear that expecting people to copy-and-paste those calls accurately is not a great idea. Let's reduce the risk of future errors by introducing single macros that encapsulate the common use-cases. Three such macros are enough to cover all but two special-purpose contexts; those two calls can be left as-is, I think. While this patch doesn't in itself improve matters for third-party extensions, it doesn't break anything for them either, and they can gradually adopt the simplified notation over time. In passing, change TopMemoryContext to use the default allocation parameters. Formerly it could only be extended 8K at a time. That was probably reasonable when this code was written; but nowadays we create many more contexts than we did then, so that it's not unusual to have a couple hundred K in TopMemoryContext, even without considering various dubious code that sticks other things there. There seems no good reason not to let it use growing blocks like most other contexts. Back-patch to 9.6, mostly because that's still close enough to HEAD that it's easy to do so, and keeping the branches in sync can be expected to avoid some future back-patching pain. The bugs fixed by these changes don't seem to be significant enough to justify fixing them further back. Discussion: <21072.1472321324@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2016-08-27 23:50:38 +02:00
ALLOCSET_DEFAULT_SIZES);
/*
* Chunk size starts at 1KB and is allowed to increase up to 1MB.
* These numbers are fairly arbitrary, though there is a hard limit at
* AFTER_TRIGGER_OFFSET; else we couldn't link event records to their
* shared records using the available space in ate_flags. Another
* constraint is that if the chunk size gets too huge, the search loop
* below would get slow given a (not too common) usage pattern with
* many distinct event types in a chunk. Therefore, we double the
* preceding chunk size only if there weren't too many shared records
* in the preceding chunk; otherwise we halve it. This gives us some
* ability to adapt to the actual usage pattern of the current query
* while still having large chunk sizes in typical usage. All chunk
* sizes used should be MAXALIGN multiples, to ensure that the shared
* records will be aligned safely.
*/
#define MIN_CHUNK_SIZE 1024
#define MAX_CHUNK_SIZE (1024*1024)
#if MAX_CHUNK_SIZE > (AFTER_TRIGGER_OFFSET+1)
#error MAX_CHUNK_SIZE must not exceed AFTER_TRIGGER_OFFSET
#endif
if (chunk == NULL)
chunksize = MIN_CHUNK_SIZE;
else
{
/* preceding chunk size... */
chunksize = chunk->endptr - (char *) chunk;
/* check number of shared records in preceding chunk */
if ((chunk->endptr - chunk->endfree) <=
(100 * sizeof(AfterTriggerSharedData)))
chunksize *= 2; /* okay, double it */
else
chunksize /= 2; /* too many shared records */
chunksize = Min(chunksize, MAX_CHUNK_SIZE);
}
chunk = MemoryContextAlloc(afterTriggers.event_cxt, chunksize);
chunk->next = NULL;
chunk->freeptr = CHUNK_DATA_START(chunk);
chunk->endptr = chunk->endfree = (char *) chunk + chunksize;
Assert(chunk->endfree - chunk->freeptr >= needed);
if (events->head == NULL)
events->head = chunk;
else
events->tail->next = chunk;
events->tail = chunk;
/* events->tailfree is now out of sync, but we'll fix it below */
}
/*
* Try to locate a matching shared-data record already in the chunk. If
* none, make a new one.
*/
for (newshared = ((AfterTriggerShared) chunk->endptr) - 1;
(char *) newshared >= chunk->endfree;
newshared--)
{
if (newshared->ats_tgoid == evtshared->ats_tgoid &&
newshared->ats_relid == evtshared->ats_relid &&
newshared->ats_event == evtshared->ats_event &&
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
newshared->ats_table == evtshared->ats_table &&
newshared->ats_firing_id == 0)
break;
}
if ((char *) newshared < chunk->endfree)
{
*newshared = *evtshared;
newshared->ats_firing_id = 0; /* just to be sure */
chunk->endfree = (char *) newshared;
}
/* Insert the data */
newevent = (AfterTriggerEvent) chunk->freeptr;
memcpy(newevent, event, eventsize);
/* ... and link the new event to its shared record */
newevent->ate_flags &= ~AFTER_TRIGGER_OFFSET;
newevent->ate_flags |= (char *) newshared - (char *) newevent;
chunk->freeptr += eventsize;
events->tailfree = chunk->freeptr;
}
/* ----------
* afterTriggerFreeEventList()
*
* Free all the event storage in the given list.
* ----------
*/
static void
afterTriggerFreeEventList(AfterTriggerEventList *events)
{
AfterTriggerEventChunk *chunk;
Fix possible dangling pointer dereference in trigger.c. AfterTriggerEndQuery correctly notes that the query_stack could get repalloc'd during a trigger firing, but it nonetheless passes the address of a query_stack entry to afterTriggerInvokeEvents, so that if such a repalloc occurs, afterTriggerInvokeEvents is already working with an obsolete dangling pointer while it scans the rest of the events. Oops. The only code at risk is its "delete_ok" cleanup code, so we can prevent unsafe behavior by passing delete_ok = false instead of true. However, that could have a significant performance penalty, because the point of passing delete_ok = true is to not have to re-scan possibly a large number of dead trigger events on the next time through the loop. There's more than one way to skin that cat, though. What we can do is delete all the "chunks" in the event list except the last one, since we know all events in them must be dead. Deleting the chunks is work we'd have had to do later in AfterTriggerEndQuery anyway, and it ends up saving rescanning of just about the same events we'd have gotten rid of with delete_ok = true. In v10 and HEAD, we also have to be careful to mop up any per-table after_trig_events pointers that would become dangling. This is slightly annoying, but I don't think that normal use-cases will traverse this code path often enough for it to be a performance problem. It's pretty hard to hit this in practice because of the unlikelihood of the query_stack getting resized at just the wrong time. Nonetheless, it's definitely a live bug of ancient standing, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2891.1505419542@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-09-17 20:50:01 +02:00
while ((chunk = events->head) != NULL)
{
Fix possible dangling pointer dereference in trigger.c. AfterTriggerEndQuery correctly notes that the query_stack could get repalloc'd during a trigger firing, but it nonetheless passes the address of a query_stack entry to afterTriggerInvokeEvents, so that if such a repalloc occurs, afterTriggerInvokeEvents is already working with an obsolete dangling pointer while it scans the rest of the events. Oops. The only code at risk is its "delete_ok" cleanup code, so we can prevent unsafe behavior by passing delete_ok = false instead of true. However, that could have a significant performance penalty, because the point of passing delete_ok = true is to not have to re-scan possibly a large number of dead trigger events on the next time through the loop. There's more than one way to skin that cat, though. What we can do is delete all the "chunks" in the event list except the last one, since we know all events in them must be dead. Deleting the chunks is work we'd have had to do later in AfterTriggerEndQuery anyway, and it ends up saving rescanning of just about the same events we'd have gotten rid of with delete_ok = true. In v10 and HEAD, we also have to be careful to mop up any per-table after_trig_events pointers that would become dangling. This is slightly annoying, but I don't think that normal use-cases will traverse this code path often enough for it to be a performance problem. It's pretty hard to hit this in practice because of the unlikelihood of the query_stack getting resized at just the wrong time. Nonetheless, it's definitely a live bug of ancient standing, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2891.1505419542@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-09-17 20:50:01 +02:00
events->head = chunk->next;
pfree(chunk);
}
events->tail = NULL;
events->tailfree = NULL;
}
/* ----------
* afterTriggerRestoreEventList()
*
* Restore an event list to its prior length, removing all the events
* added since it had the value old_events.
* ----------
*/
static void
afterTriggerRestoreEventList(AfterTriggerEventList *events,
const AfterTriggerEventList *old_events)
{
AfterTriggerEventChunk *chunk;
AfterTriggerEventChunk *next_chunk;
if (old_events->tail == NULL)
{
/* restoring to a completely empty state, so free everything */
afterTriggerFreeEventList(events);
}
else
{
*events = *old_events;
/* free any chunks after the last one we want to keep */
for (chunk = events->tail->next; chunk != NULL; chunk = next_chunk)
{
next_chunk = chunk->next;
pfree(chunk);
}
/* and clean up the tail chunk to be the right length */
events->tail->next = NULL;
events->tail->freeptr = events->tailfree;
/*
* We don't make any effort to remove now-unused shared data records.
* They might still be useful, anyway.
*/
}
}
Fix possible dangling pointer dereference in trigger.c. AfterTriggerEndQuery correctly notes that the query_stack could get repalloc'd during a trigger firing, but it nonetheless passes the address of a query_stack entry to afterTriggerInvokeEvents, so that if such a repalloc occurs, afterTriggerInvokeEvents is already working with an obsolete dangling pointer while it scans the rest of the events. Oops. The only code at risk is its "delete_ok" cleanup code, so we can prevent unsafe behavior by passing delete_ok = false instead of true. However, that could have a significant performance penalty, because the point of passing delete_ok = true is to not have to re-scan possibly a large number of dead trigger events on the next time through the loop. There's more than one way to skin that cat, though. What we can do is delete all the "chunks" in the event list except the last one, since we know all events in them must be dead. Deleting the chunks is work we'd have had to do later in AfterTriggerEndQuery anyway, and it ends up saving rescanning of just about the same events we'd have gotten rid of with delete_ok = true. In v10 and HEAD, we also have to be careful to mop up any per-table after_trig_events pointers that would become dangling. This is slightly annoying, but I don't think that normal use-cases will traverse this code path often enough for it to be a performance problem. It's pretty hard to hit this in practice because of the unlikelihood of the query_stack getting resized at just the wrong time. Nonetheless, it's definitely a live bug of ancient standing, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2891.1505419542@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-09-17 20:50:01 +02:00
/* ----------
* afterTriggerDeleteHeadEventChunk()
*
* Remove the first chunk of events from the query level's event list.
* Keep any event list pointers elsewhere in the query level's data
* structures in sync.
* ----------
*/
static void
afterTriggerDeleteHeadEventChunk(AfterTriggersQueryData *qs)
{
AfterTriggerEventChunk *target = qs->events.head;
ListCell *lc;
Assert(target && target->next);
/*
* First, update any pointers in the per-table data, so that they won't be
* dangling. Resetting obsoleted pointers to NULL will make
* cancel_prior_stmt_triggers start from the list head, which is fine.
*/
foreach(lc, qs->tables)
{
AfterTriggersTableData *table = (AfterTriggersTableData *) lfirst(lc);
if (table->after_trig_done &&
table->after_trig_events.tail == target)
{
table->after_trig_events.head = NULL;
table->after_trig_events.tail = NULL;
table->after_trig_events.tailfree = NULL;
}
}
/* Now we can flush the head chunk */
qs->events.head = target->next;
pfree(target);
}
/* ----------
* AfterTriggerExecute()
*
* Fetch the required tuples back from the heap and fire one
* single trigger function.
*
* Frequently, this will be fired many times in a row for triggers of
* a single relation. Therefore, we cache the open relation and provide
* fmgr lookup cache space at the caller level. (For triggers fired at
* the end of a query, we can even piggyback on the executor's state.)
*
* event: event currently being fired.
* rel: open relation for event.
* trigdesc: working copy of rel's trigger info.
* finfo: array of fmgr lookup cache entries (one per trigger in trigdesc).
* instr: array of EXPLAIN ANALYZE instrumentation nodes (one per trigger),
* or NULL if no instrumentation is wanted.
* per_tuple_context: memory context to call trigger function in.
* trig_tuple_slot1: scratch slot for tg_trigtuple (foreign tables only)
* trig_tuple_slot2: scratch slot for tg_newtuple (foreign tables only)
* ----------
*/
static void
AfterTriggerExecute(AfterTriggerEvent event,
Relation rel, TriggerDesc *trigdesc,
FmgrInfo *finfo, Instrumentation *instr,
MemoryContext per_tuple_context,
TupleTableSlot *trig_tuple_slot1,
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
TupleTableSlot *trig_tuple_slot2)
{
AfterTriggerShared evtshared = GetTriggerSharedData(event);
Oid tgoid = evtshared->ats_tgoid;
TriggerData LocTriggerData;
HeapTupleData tuple1;
HeapTupleData tuple2;
HeapTuple rettuple;
Buffer buffer1 = InvalidBuffer;
Buffer buffer2 = InvalidBuffer;
int tgindx;
/*
* Locate trigger in trigdesc.
*/
LocTriggerData.tg_trigger = NULL;
for (tgindx = 0; tgindx < trigdesc->numtriggers; tgindx++)
{
if (trigdesc->triggers[tgindx].tgoid == tgoid)
{
LocTriggerData.tg_trigger = &(trigdesc->triggers[tgindx]);
break;
}
}
if (LocTriggerData.tg_trigger == NULL)
elog(ERROR, "could not find trigger %u", tgoid);
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* If doing EXPLAIN ANALYZE, start charging time to this trigger. We want
* to include time spent re-fetching tuples in the trigger cost.
*/
if (instr)
InstrStartNode(instr + tgindx);
/*
* Fetch the required tuple(s).
*/
switch (event->ate_flags & AFTER_TRIGGER_TUP_BITS)
{
case AFTER_TRIGGER_FDW_FETCH:
{
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
Tuplestorestate *fdw_tuplestore = GetCurrentFDWTuplestore();
if (!tuplestore_gettupleslot(fdw_tuplestore, true, false,
trig_tuple_slot1))
elog(ERROR, "failed to fetch tuple1 for AFTER trigger");
if ((evtshared->ats_event & TRIGGER_EVENT_OPMASK) ==
TRIGGER_EVENT_UPDATE &&
!tuplestore_gettupleslot(fdw_tuplestore, true, false,
trig_tuple_slot2))
elog(ERROR, "failed to fetch tuple2 for AFTER trigger");
}
/* fall through */
case AFTER_TRIGGER_FDW_REUSE:
/*
* Using ExecMaterializeSlot() rather than ExecFetchSlotTuple()
* ensures that tg_trigtuple does not reference tuplestore memory.
* (It is formally possible for the trigger function to queue
* trigger events that add to the same tuplestore, which can push
* other tuples out of memory.) The distinction is academic,
* because we start with a minimal tuple that ExecFetchSlotTuple()
* must materialize anyway.
*/
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuple =
ExecMaterializeSlot(trig_tuple_slot1);
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuple =
((evtshared->ats_event & TRIGGER_EVENT_OPMASK) ==
TRIGGER_EVENT_UPDATE) ?
ExecMaterializeSlot(trig_tuple_slot2) : NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
break;
default:
if (ItemPointerIsValid(&(event->ate_ctid1)))
{
ItemPointerCopy(&(event->ate_ctid1), &(tuple1.t_self));
if (!heap_fetch(rel, SnapshotAny, &tuple1, &buffer1, false, NULL))
elog(ERROR, "failed to fetch tuple1 for AFTER trigger");
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuple = &tuple1;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuplebuf = buffer1;
}
else
{
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuple = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
}
/* don't touch ctid2 if not there */
if ((event->ate_flags & AFTER_TRIGGER_TUP_BITS) ==
AFTER_TRIGGER_2CTID &&
ItemPointerIsValid(&(event->ate_ctid2)))
{
ItemPointerCopy(&(event->ate_ctid2), &(tuple2.t_self));
if (!heap_fetch(rel, SnapshotAny, &tuple2, &buffer2, false, NULL))
elog(ERROR, "failed to fetch tuple2 for AFTER trigger");
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuple = &tuple2;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuplebuf = buffer2;
}
else
{
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuple = NULL;
LocTriggerData.tg_newtuplebuf = InvalidBuffer;
}
}
/*
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* Set up the tuplestore information to let the trigger have access to
* transition tables. When we first make a transition table available to
* a trigger, mark it "closed" so that it cannot change anymore. If any
* additional events of the same type get queued in the current trigger
* query level, they'll go into new transition tables.
*/
LocTriggerData.tg_oldtable = LocTriggerData.tg_newtable = NULL;
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
if (evtshared->ats_table)
{
if (LocTriggerData.tg_trigger->tgoldtable)
{
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
LocTriggerData.tg_oldtable = evtshared->ats_table->old_tuplestore;
evtshared->ats_table->closed = true;
}
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
if (LocTriggerData.tg_trigger->tgnewtable)
{
LocTriggerData.tg_newtable = evtshared->ats_table->new_tuplestore;
evtshared->ats_table->closed = true;
}
}
/*
* Setup the remaining trigger information
*/
LocTriggerData.type = T_TriggerData;
LocTriggerData.tg_event =
evtshared->ats_event & (TRIGGER_EVENT_OPMASK | TRIGGER_EVENT_ROW);
LocTriggerData.tg_relation = rel;
MemoryContextReset(per_tuple_context);
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* Call the trigger and throw away any possibly returned updated tuple.
* (Don't let ExecCallTriggerFunc measure EXPLAIN time.)
*/
rettuple = ExecCallTriggerFunc(&LocTriggerData,
tgindx,
finfo,
NULL,
per_tuple_context);
if (rettuple != NULL &&
rettuple != LocTriggerData.tg_trigtuple &&
rettuple != LocTriggerData.tg_newtuple)
heap_freetuple(rettuple);
/*
* Release buffers
*/
if (buffer1 != InvalidBuffer)
ReleaseBuffer(buffer1);
if (buffer2 != InvalidBuffer)
ReleaseBuffer(buffer2);
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* If doing EXPLAIN ANALYZE, stop charging time to this trigger, and count
* one "tuple returned" (really the number of firings).
*/
if (instr)
InstrStopNode(instr + tgindx, 1);
}
/*
* afterTriggerMarkEvents()
*
* Scan the given event list for not yet invoked events. Mark the ones
* that can be invoked now with the current firing ID.
*
* If move_list isn't NULL, events that are not to be invoked now are
* transferred to move_list.
*
* When immediate_only is TRUE, do not invoke currently-deferred triggers.
* (This will be FALSE only at main transaction exit.)
*
* Returns TRUE if any invokable events were found.
*/
static bool
afterTriggerMarkEvents(AfterTriggerEventList *events,
AfterTriggerEventList *move_list,
bool immediate_only)
{
bool found = false;
AfterTriggerEvent event;
AfterTriggerEventChunk *chunk;
for_each_event_chunk(event, chunk, *events)
{
AfterTriggerShared evtshared = GetTriggerSharedData(event);
bool defer_it = false;
if (!(event->ate_flags &
(AFTER_TRIGGER_DONE | AFTER_TRIGGER_IN_PROGRESS)))
{
/*
* This trigger hasn't been called or scheduled yet. Check if we
* should call it now.
*/
if (immediate_only && afterTriggerCheckState(evtshared))
{
defer_it = true;
}
else
{
/*
* Mark it as to be fired in this firing cycle.
*/
evtshared->ats_firing_id = afterTriggers.firing_counter;
event->ate_flags |= AFTER_TRIGGER_IN_PROGRESS;
found = true;
}
}
/*
* If it's deferred, move it to move_list, if requested.
*/
if (defer_it && move_list != NULL)
{
/* add it to move_list */
afterTriggerAddEvent(move_list, event, evtshared);
/* mark original copy "done" so we don't do it again */
event->ate_flags |= AFTER_TRIGGER_DONE;
}
}
return found;
}
/*
* afterTriggerInvokeEvents()
*
* Scan the given event list for events that are marked as to be fired
* in the current firing cycle, and fire them.
*
* If estate isn't NULL, we use its result relation info to avoid repeated
* openings and closing of trigger target relations. If it is NULL, we
* make one locally to cache the info in case there are multiple trigger
* events per rel.
*
* When delete_ok is TRUE, it's safe to delete fully-processed events.
* (We are not very tense about that: we simply reset a chunk to be empty
* if all its events got fired. The objective here is just to avoid useless
* rescanning of events when a trigger queues new events during transaction
* end, so it's not necessary to worry much about the case where only
* some events are fired.)
*
* Returns TRUE if no unfired events remain in the list (this allows us
* to avoid repeating afterTriggerMarkEvents).
*/
static bool
afterTriggerInvokeEvents(AfterTriggerEventList *events,
CommandId firing_id,
EState *estate,
bool delete_ok)
{
bool all_fired = true;
AfterTriggerEventChunk *chunk;
MemoryContext per_tuple_context;
bool local_estate = false;
Relation rel = NULL;
TriggerDesc *trigdesc = NULL;
FmgrInfo *finfo = NULL;
Instrumentation *instr = NULL;
TupleTableSlot *slot1 = NULL,
*slot2 = NULL;
/* Make a local EState if need be */
if (estate == NULL)
{
estate = CreateExecutorState();
local_estate = true;
}
/* Make a per-tuple memory context for trigger function calls */
per_tuple_context =
AllocSetContextCreate(CurrentMemoryContext,
"AfterTriggerTupleContext",
Add macros to make AllocSetContextCreate() calls simpler and safer. I found that half a dozen (nearly 5%) of our AllocSetContextCreate calls had typos in the context-sizing parameters. While none of these led to especially significant problems, they did create minor inefficiencies, and it's now clear that expecting people to copy-and-paste those calls accurately is not a great idea. Let's reduce the risk of future errors by introducing single macros that encapsulate the common use-cases. Three such macros are enough to cover all but two special-purpose contexts; those two calls can be left as-is, I think. While this patch doesn't in itself improve matters for third-party extensions, it doesn't break anything for them either, and they can gradually adopt the simplified notation over time. In passing, change TopMemoryContext to use the default allocation parameters. Formerly it could only be extended 8K at a time. That was probably reasonable when this code was written; but nowadays we create many more contexts than we did then, so that it's not unusual to have a couple hundred K in TopMemoryContext, even without considering various dubious code that sticks other things there. There seems no good reason not to let it use growing blocks like most other contexts. Back-patch to 9.6, mostly because that's still close enough to HEAD that it's easy to do so, and keeping the branches in sync can be expected to avoid some future back-patching pain. The bugs fixed by these changes don't seem to be significant enough to justify fixing them further back. Discussion: <21072.1472321324@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2016-08-27 23:50:38 +02:00
ALLOCSET_DEFAULT_SIZES);
for_each_chunk(chunk, *events)
{
AfterTriggerEvent event;
bool all_fired_in_chunk = true;
for_each_event(event, chunk)
{
AfterTriggerShared evtshared = GetTriggerSharedData(event);
/*
* Is it one for me to fire?
*/
if ((event->ate_flags & AFTER_TRIGGER_IN_PROGRESS) &&
evtshared->ats_firing_id == firing_id)
{
/*
* So let's fire it... but first, find the correct relation if
* this is not the same relation as before.
*/
if (rel == NULL || RelationGetRelid(rel) != evtshared->ats_relid)
{
ResultRelInfo *rInfo;
rInfo = ExecGetTriggerResultRel(estate, evtshared->ats_relid);
rel = rInfo->ri_RelationDesc;
trigdesc = rInfo->ri_TrigDesc;
finfo = rInfo->ri_TrigFunctions;
instr = rInfo->ri_TrigInstrument;
if (rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_FOREIGN_TABLE)
{
if (slot1 != NULL)
{
ExecDropSingleTupleTableSlot(slot1);
ExecDropSingleTupleTableSlot(slot2);
}
slot1 = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(rel->rd_att);
slot2 = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(rel->rd_att);
}
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
if (trigdesc == NULL) /* should not happen */
elog(ERROR, "relation %u has no triggers",
evtshared->ats_relid);
}
/*
* Fire it. Note that the AFTER_TRIGGER_IN_PROGRESS flag is
* still set, so recursive examinations of the event list
* won't try to re-fire it.
*/
AfterTriggerExecute(event, rel, trigdesc, finfo, instr,
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
per_tuple_context, slot1, slot2);
/*
* Mark the event as done.
*/
event->ate_flags &= ~AFTER_TRIGGER_IN_PROGRESS;
event->ate_flags |= AFTER_TRIGGER_DONE;
}
else if (!(event->ate_flags & AFTER_TRIGGER_DONE))
{
/* something remains to be done */
all_fired = all_fired_in_chunk = false;
}
}
/* Clear the chunk if delete_ok and nothing left of interest */
if (delete_ok && all_fired_in_chunk)
{
chunk->freeptr = CHUNK_DATA_START(chunk);
chunk->endfree = chunk->endptr;
/*
* If it's last chunk, must sync event list's tailfree too. Note
* that delete_ok must NOT be passed as true if there could be
Fix possible dangling pointer dereference in trigger.c. AfterTriggerEndQuery correctly notes that the query_stack could get repalloc'd during a trigger firing, but it nonetheless passes the address of a query_stack entry to afterTriggerInvokeEvents, so that if such a repalloc occurs, afterTriggerInvokeEvents is already working with an obsolete dangling pointer while it scans the rest of the events. Oops. The only code at risk is its "delete_ok" cleanup code, so we can prevent unsafe behavior by passing delete_ok = false instead of true. However, that could have a significant performance penalty, because the point of passing delete_ok = true is to not have to re-scan possibly a large number of dead trigger events on the next time through the loop. There's more than one way to skin that cat, though. What we can do is delete all the "chunks" in the event list except the last one, since we know all events in them must be dead. Deleting the chunks is work we'd have had to do later in AfterTriggerEndQuery anyway, and it ends up saving rescanning of just about the same events we'd have gotten rid of with delete_ok = true. In v10 and HEAD, we also have to be careful to mop up any per-table after_trig_events pointers that would become dangling. This is slightly annoying, but I don't think that normal use-cases will traverse this code path often enough for it to be a performance problem. It's pretty hard to hit this in practice because of the unlikelihood of the query_stack getting resized at just the wrong time. Nonetheless, it's definitely a live bug of ancient standing, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2891.1505419542@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-09-17 20:50:01 +02:00
* additional AfterTriggerEventList values pointing at this event
* list, since we'd fail to fix their copies of tailfree.
*/
if (chunk == events->tail)
events->tailfree = chunk->freeptr;
}
}
if (slot1 != NULL)
{
ExecDropSingleTupleTableSlot(slot1);
ExecDropSingleTupleTableSlot(slot2);
}
/* Release working resources */
MemoryContextDelete(per_tuple_context);
if (local_estate)
{
ExecCleanUpTriggerState(estate);
FreeExecutorState(estate);
}
return all_fired;
}
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
/*
* GetAfterTriggersTableData
*
* Find or create an AfterTriggersTableData struct for the specified
* trigger event (relation + operation type). Ignore existing structs
* marked "closed"; we don't want to put any additional tuples into them,
* nor change their stmt-triggers-fired state.
*
* Note: the AfterTriggersTableData list is allocated in the current
* (sub)transaction's CurTransactionContext. This is OK because
* we don't need it to live past AfterTriggerEndQuery.
*/
static AfterTriggersTableData *
GetAfterTriggersTableData(Oid relid, CmdType cmdType)
{
AfterTriggersTableData *table;
AfterTriggersQueryData *qs;
MemoryContext oldcxt;
ListCell *lc;
/* Caller should have ensured query_depth is OK. */
Assert(afterTriggers.query_depth >= 0 &&
afterTriggers.query_depth < afterTriggers.maxquerydepth);
qs = &afterTriggers.query_stack[afterTriggers.query_depth];
foreach(lc, qs->tables)
{
table = (AfterTriggersTableData *) lfirst(lc);
if (table->relid == relid && table->cmdType == cmdType &&
!table->closed)
return table;
}
oldcxt = MemoryContextSwitchTo(CurTransactionContext);
table = (AfterTriggersTableData *) palloc0(sizeof(AfterTriggersTableData));
table->relid = relid;
table->cmdType = cmdType;
qs->tables = lappend(qs->tables, table);
MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcxt);
return table;
}
/*
* MakeTransitionCaptureState
*
* Make a TransitionCaptureState object for the given TriggerDesc, target
* relation, and operation type. The TCS object holds all the state needed
* to decide whether to capture tuples in transition tables.
*
* If there are no triggers in 'trigdesc' that request relevant transition
* tables, then return NULL.
*
* The resulting object can be passed to the ExecAR* functions. The caller
* should set tcs_map or tcs_original_insert_tuple as appropriate when dealing
* with child tables.
*
* Note that we copy the flags from a parent table into this struct (rather
* than subsequently using the relation's TriggerDesc directly) so that we can
* use it to control collection of transition tuples from child tables.
*
* Per SQL spec, all operations of the same kind (INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE)
* on the same table during one query should share one transition table.
* Therefore, the Tuplestores are owned by an AfterTriggersTableData struct
* looked up using the table OID + CmdType, and are merely referenced by
* the TransitionCaptureState objects we hand out to callers.
*/
TransitionCaptureState *
MakeTransitionCaptureState(TriggerDesc *trigdesc, Oid relid, CmdType cmdType)
{
TransitionCaptureState *state;
bool need_old,
need_new;
AfterTriggersTableData *table;
MemoryContext oldcxt;
ResourceOwner saveResourceOwner;
if (trigdesc == NULL)
return NULL;
/* Detect which table(s) we need. */
switch (cmdType)
{
case CMD_INSERT:
need_old = false;
need_new = trigdesc->trig_insert_new_table;
break;
case CMD_UPDATE:
need_old = trigdesc->trig_update_old_table;
need_new = trigdesc->trig_update_new_table;
break;
case CMD_DELETE:
need_old = trigdesc->trig_delete_old_table;
need_new = false;
break;
default:
elog(ERROR, "unexpected CmdType: %d", (int) cmdType);
need_old = need_new = false; /* keep compiler quiet */
break;
}
if (!need_old && !need_new)
return NULL;
/* Check state, like AfterTriggerSaveEvent. */
if (afterTriggers.query_depth < 0)
elog(ERROR, "MakeTransitionCaptureState() called outside of query");
/* Be sure we have enough space to record events at this query depth. */
if (afterTriggers.query_depth >= afterTriggers.maxquerydepth)
AfterTriggerEnlargeQueryState();
/*
* Find or create an AfterTriggersTableData struct to hold the
* tuplestore(s). If there's a matching struct but it's marked closed,
* ignore it; we need a newer one.
*
* Note: the AfterTriggersTableData list, as well as the tuplestores, are
* allocated in the current (sub)transaction's CurTransactionContext, and
* the tuplestores are managed by the (sub)transaction's resource owner.
* This is sufficient lifespan because we do not allow triggers using
* transition tables to be deferrable; they will be fired during
* AfterTriggerEndQuery, after which it's okay to delete the data.
*/
table = GetAfterTriggersTableData(relid, cmdType);
/* Now create required tuplestore(s), if we don't have them already. */
oldcxt = MemoryContextSwitchTo(CurTransactionContext);
saveResourceOwner = CurrentResourceOwner;
CurrentResourceOwner = CurTransactionResourceOwner;
if (need_old && table->old_tuplestore == NULL)
table->old_tuplestore = tuplestore_begin_heap(false, false, work_mem);
if (need_new && table->new_tuplestore == NULL)
table->new_tuplestore = tuplestore_begin_heap(false, false, work_mem);
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
CurrentResourceOwner = saveResourceOwner;
MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcxt);
/* Now build the TransitionCaptureState struct, in caller's context */
state = (TransitionCaptureState *) palloc0(sizeof(TransitionCaptureState));
state->tcs_delete_old_table = trigdesc->trig_delete_old_table;
state->tcs_update_old_table = trigdesc->trig_update_old_table;
state->tcs_update_new_table = trigdesc->trig_update_new_table;
state->tcs_insert_new_table = trigdesc->trig_insert_new_table;
state->tcs_private = table;
return state;
}
/* ----------
* AfterTriggerBeginXact()
*
* Called at transaction start (either BEGIN or implicit for single
* statement outside of transaction block).
* ----------
*/
void
AfterTriggerBeginXact(void)
{
/*
* Initialize after-trigger state structure to empty
*/
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
afterTriggers.firing_counter = (CommandId) 1; /* mustn't be 0 */
afterTriggers.query_depth = -1;
/*
* Verify that there is no leftover state remaining. If these assertions
* trip, it means that AfterTriggerEndXact wasn't called or didn't clean
* up properly.
*/
Assert(afterTriggers.state == NULL);
Assert(afterTriggers.query_stack == NULL);
Assert(afterTriggers.maxquerydepth == 0);
Assert(afterTriggers.event_cxt == NULL);
Assert(afterTriggers.events.head == NULL);
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
Assert(afterTriggers.trans_stack == NULL);
Assert(afterTriggers.maxtransdepth == 0);
}
/* ----------
* AfterTriggerBeginQuery()
*
* Called just before we start processing a single query within a
* transaction (or subtransaction). Most of the real work gets deferred
* until somebody actually tries to queue a trigger event.
* ----------
*/
void
AfterTriggerBeginQuery(void)
{
/* Increase the query stack depth */
afterTriggers.query_depth++;
}
/* ----------
* AfterTriggerEndQuery()
*
* Called after one query has been completely processed. At this time
* we invoke all AFTER IMMEDIATE trigger events queued by the query, and
* transfer deferred trigger events to the global deferred-trigger list.
*
* Note that this must be called BEFORE closing down the executor
* with ExecutorEnd, because we make use of the EState's info about
* target relations. Normally it is called from ExecutorFinish.
* ----------
*/
void
AfterTriggerEndQuery(EState *estate)
{
Fix possible dangling pointer dereference in trigger.c. AfterTriggerEndQuery correctly notes that the query_stack could get repalloc'd during a trigger firing, but it nonetheless passes the address of a query_stack entry to afterTriggerInvokeEvents, so that if such a repalloc occurs, afterTriggerInvokeEvents is already working with an obsolete dangling pointer while it scans the rest of the events. Oops. The only code at risk is its "delete_ok" cleanup code, so we can prevent unsafe behavior by passing delete_ok = false instead of true. However, that could have a significant performance penalty, because the point of passing delete_ok = true is to not have to re-scan possibly a large number of dead trigger events on the next time through the loop. There's more than one way to skin that cat, though. What we can do is delete all the "chunks" in the event list except the last one, since we know all events in them must be dead. Deleting the chunks is work we'd have had to do later in AfterTriggerEndQuery anyway, and it ends up saving rescanning of just about the same events we'd have gotten rid of with delete_ok = true. In v10 and HEAD, we also have to be careful to mop up any per-table after_trig_events pointers that would become dangling. This is slightly annoying, but I don't think that normal use-cases will traverse this code path often enough for it to be a performance problem. It's pretty hard to hit this in practice because of the unlikelihood of the query_stack getting resized at just the wrong time. Nonetheless, it's definitely a live bug of ancient standing, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2891.1505419542@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-09-17 20:50:01 +02:00
AfterTriggersQueryData *qs;
/* Must be inside a query, too */
Assert(afterTriggers.query_depth >= 0);
/*
* If we never even got as far as initializing the event stack, there
* certainly won't be any events, so exit quickly.
*/
if (afterTriggers.query_depth >= afterTriggers.maxquerydepth)
{
afterTriggers.query_depth--;
return;
}
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* Process all immediate-mode triggers queued by the query, and move the
* deferred ones to the main list of deferred events.
*
* Notice that we decide which ones will be fired, and put the deferred
* ones on the main list, before anything is actually fired. This ensures
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* reasonably sane behavior if a trigger function does SET CONSTRAINTS ...
* IMMEDIATE: all events we have decided to defer will be available for it
* to fire.
*
* We loop in case a trigger queues more events at the same query level.
* Ordinary trigger functions, including all PL/pgSQL trigger functions,
* will instead fire any triggers in a dedicated query level. Foreign key
* enforcement triggers do add to the current query level, thanks to their
* passing fire_triggers = false to SPI_execute_snapshot(). Other
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* C-language triggers might do likewise.
*
* If we find no firable events, we don't have to increment
* firing_counter.
*/
Fix possible dangling pointer dereference in trigger.c. AfterTriggerEndQuery correctly notes that the query_stack could get repalloc'd during a trigger firing, but it nonetheless passes the address of a query_stack entry to afterTriggerInvokeEvents, so that if such a repalloc occurs, afterTriggerInvokeEvents is already working with an obsolete dangling pointer while it scans the rest of the events. Oops. The only code at risk is its "delete_ok" cleanup code, so we can prevent unsafe behavior by passing delete_ok = false instead of true. However, that could have a significant performance penalty, because the point of passing delete_ok = true is to not have to re-scan possibly a large number of dead trigger events on the next time through the loop. There's more than one way to skin that cat, though. What we can do is delete all the "chunks" in the event list except the last one, since we know all events in them must be dead. Deleting the chunks is work we'd have had to do later in AfterTriggerEndQuery anyway, and it ends up saving rescanning of just about the same events we'd have gotten rid of with delete_ok = true. In v10 and HEAD, we also have to be careful to mop up any per-table after_trig_events pointers that would become dangling. This is slightly annoying, but I don't think that normal use-cases will traverse this code path often enough for it to be a performance problem. It's pretty hard to hit this in practice because of the unlikelihood of the query_stack getting resized at just the wrong time. Nonetheless, it's definitely a live bug of ancient standing, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2891.1505419542@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-09-17 20:50:01 +02:00
qs = &afterTriggers.query_stack[afterTriggers.query_depth];
for (;;)
{
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
if (afterTriggerMarkEvents(&qs->events, &afterTriggers.events, true))
{
CommandId firing_id = afterTriggers.firing_counter++;
Fix possible dangling pointer dereference in trigger.c. AfterTriggerEndQuery correctly notes that the query_stack could get repalloc'd during a trigger firing, but it nonetheless passes the address of a query_stack entry to afterTriggerInvokeEvents, so that if such a repalloc occurs, afterTriggerInvokeEvents is already working with an obsolete dangling pointer while it scans the rest of the events. Oops. The only code at risk is its "delete_ok" cleanup code, so we can prevent unsafe behavior by passing delete_ok = false instead of true. However, that could have a significant performance penalty, because the point of passing delete_ok = true is to not have to re-scan possibly a large number of dead trigger events on the next time through the loop. There's more than one way to skin that cat, though. What we can do is delete all the "chunks" in the event list except the last one, since we know all events in them must be dead. Deleting the chunks is work we'd have had to do later in AfterTriggerEndQuery anyway, and it ends up saving rescanning of just about the same events we'd have gotten rid of with delete_ok = true. In v10 and HEAD, we also have to be careful to mop up any per-table after_trig_events pointers that would become dangling. This is slightly annoying, but I don't think that normal use-cases will traverse this code path often enough for it to be a performance problem. It's pretty hard to hit this in practice because of the unlikelihood of the query_stack getting resized at just the wrong time. Nonetheless, it's definitely a live bug of ancient standing, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2891.1505419542@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-09-17 20:50:01 +02:00
AfterTriggerEventChunk *oldtail = qs->events.tail;
Fix possible dangling pointer dereference in trigger.c. AfterTriggerEndQuery correctly notes that the query_stack could get repalloc'd during a trigger firing, but it nonetheless passes the address of a query_stack entry to afterTriggerInvokeEvents, so that if such a repalloc occurs, afterTriggerInvokeEvents is already working with an obsolete dangling pointer while it scans the rest of the events. Oops. The only code at risk is its "delete_ok" cleanup code, so we can prevent unsafe behavior by passing delete_ok = false instead of true. However, that could have a significant performance penalty, because the point of passing delete_ok = true is to not have to re-scan possibly a large number of dead trigger events on the next time through the loop. There's more than one way to skin that cat, though. What we can do is delete all the "chunks" in the event list except the last one, since we know all events in them must be dead. Deleting the chunks is work we'd have had to do later in AfterTriggerEndQuery anyway, and it ends up saving rescanning of just about the same events we'd have gotten rid of with delete_ok = true. In v10 and HEAD, we also have to be careful to mop up any per-table after_trig_events pointers that would become dangling. This is slightly annoying, but I don't think that normal use-cases will traverse this code path often enough for it to be a performance problem. It's pretty hard to hit this in practice because of the unlikelihood of the query_stack getting resized at just the wrong time. Nonetheless, it's definitely a live bug of ancient standing, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2891.1505419542@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-09-17 20:50:01 +02:00
if (afterTriggerInvokeEvents(&qs->events, firing_id, estate, false))
break; /* all fired */
Fix possible dangling pointer dereference in trigger.c. AfterTriggerEndQuery correctly notes that the query_stack could get repalloc'd during a trigger firing, but it nonetheless passes the address of a query_stack entry to afterTriggerInvokeEvents, so that if such a repalloc occurs, afterTriggerInvokeEvents is already working with an obsolete dangling pointer while it scans the rest of the events. Oops. The only code at risk is its "delete_ok" cleanup code, so we can prevent unsafe behavior by passing delete_ok = false instead of true. However, that could have a significant performance penalty, because the point of passing delete_ok = true is to not have to re-scan possibly a large number of dead trigger events on the next time through the loop. There's more than one way to skin that cat, though. What we can do is delete all the "chunks" in the event list except the last one, since we know all events in them must be dead. Deleting the chunks is work we'd have had to do later in AfterTriggerEndQuery anyway, and it ends up saving rescanning of just about the same events we'd have gotten rid of with delete_ok = true. In v10 and HEAD, we also have to be careful to mop up any per-table after_trig_events pointers that would become dangling. This is slightly annoying, but I don't think that normal use-cases will traverse this code path often enough for it to be a performance problem. It's pretty hard to hit this in practice because of the unlikelihood of the query_stack getting resized at just the wrong time. Nonetheless, it's definitely a live bug of ancient standing, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2891.1505419542@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-09-17 20:50:01 +02:00
/*
* Firing a trigger could result in query_stack being repalloc'd,
* so we must recalculate qs after each afterTriggerInvokeEvents
* call. Furthermore, it's unsafe to pass delete_ok = true here,
* because that could cause afterTriggerInvokeEvents to try to
* access qs->events after the stack has been repalloc'd.
*/
qs = &afterTriggers.query_stack[afterTriggers.query_depth];
/*
* We'll need to scan the events list again. To reduce the cost
* of doing so, get rid of completely-fired chunks. We know that
* all events were marked IN_PROGRESS or DONE at the conclusion of
* afterTriggerMarkEvents, so any still-interesting events must
* have been added after that, and so must be in the chunk that
* was then the tail chunk, or in later chunks. So, zap all
* chunks before oldtail. This is approximately the same set of
* events we would have gotten rid of by passing delete_ok = true.
*/
Assert(oldtail != NULL);
while (qs->events.head != oldtail)
afterTriggerDeleteHeadEventChunk(qs);
}
else
break;
}
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
/* Release query-level-local storage, including tuplestores if any */
AfterTriggerFreeQuery(&afterTriggers.query_stack[afterTriggers.query_depth]);
afterTriggers.query_depth--;
}
/*
* AfterTriggerFreeQuery
* Release subsidiary storage for a trigger query level.
* This includes closing down tuplestores.
* Note: it's important for this to be safe if interrupted by an error
* and then called again for the same query level.
*/
static void
AfterTriggerFreeQuery(AfterTriggersQueryData *qs)
{
Tuplestorestate *ts;
List *tables;
ListCell *lc;
/* Drop the trigger events */
afterTriggerFreeEventList(&qs->events);
/* Drop FDW tuplestore if any */
ts = qs->fdw_tuplestore;
qs->fdw_tuplestore = NULL;
if (ts)
tuplestore_end(ts);
/* Release per-table subsidiary storage */
tables = qs->tables;
foreach(lc, tables)
{
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
AfterTriggersTableData *table = (AfterTriggersTableData *) lfirst(lc);
ts = table->old_tuplestore;
table->old_tuplestore = NULL;
if (ts)
tuplestore_end(ts);
ts = table->new_tuplestore;
table->new_tuplestore = NULL;
if (ts)
tuplestore_end(ts);
}
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
/*
* Now free the AfterTriggersTableData structs and list cells. Reset list
* pointer first; if list_free_deep somehow gets an error, better to leak
* that storage than have an infinite loop.
*/
qs->tables = NIL;
list_free_deep(tables);
}
/* ----------
* AfterTriggerFireDeferred()
*
* Called just before the current transaction is committed. At this
* time we invoke all pending DEFERRED triggers.
*
* It is possible for other modules to queue additional deferred triggers
* during pre-commit processing; therefore xact.c may have to call this
* multiple times.
* ----------
*/
void
AfterTriggerFireDeferred(void)
{
AfterTriggerEventList *events;
bool snap_pushed = false;
/* Must not be inside a query */
Assert(afterTriggers.query_depth == -1);
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* If there are any triggers to fire, make sure we have set a snapshot for
* them to use. (Since PortalRunUtility doesn't set a snap for COMMIT, we
* can't assume ActiveSnapshot is valid on entry.)
*/
events = &afterTriggers.events;
if (events->head != NULL)
{
PushActiveSnapshot(GetTransactionSnapshot());
snap_pushed = true;
}
/*
* Run all the remaining triggers. Loop until they are all gone, in case
* some trigger queues more for us to do.
*/
while (afterTriggerMarkEvents(events, NULL, false))
{
CommandId firing_id = afterTriggers.firing_counter++;
if (afterTriggerInvokeEvents(events, firing_id, NULL, true))
break; /* all fired */
}
/*
* We don't bother freeing the event list, since it will go away anyway
* (and more efficiently than via pfree) in AfterTriggerEndXact.
*/
if (snap_pushed)
PopActiveSnapshot();
}
/* ----------
* AfterTriggerEndXact()
*
* The current transaction is finishing.
*
* Any unfired triggers are canceled so we simply throw
* away anything we know.
*
* Note: it is possible for this to be called repeatedly in case of
* error during transaction abort; therefore, do not complain if
* already closed down.
* ----------
*/
void
AfterTriggerEndXact(bool isCommit)
{
/*
* Forget the pending-events list.
*
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
* Since all the info is in TopTransactionContext or children thereof, we
* don't really need to do anything to reclaim memory. However, the
* pending-events list could be large, and so it's useful to discard it as
* soon as possible --- especially if we are aborting because we ran out
* of memory for the list!
*/
if (afterTriggers.event_cxt)
{
MemoryContextDelete(afterTriggers.event_cxt);
afterTriggers.event_cxt = NULL;
afterTriggers.events.head = NULL;
afterTriggers.events.tail = NULL;
afterTriggers.events.tailfree = NULL;
}
/*
* Forget any subtransaction state as well. Since this can't be very
* large, we let the eventual reset of TopTransactionContext free the
* memory instead of doing it here.
*/
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
afterTriggers.trans_stack = NULL;
afterTriggers.maxtransdepth = 0;
/*
* Forget the query stack and constraint-related state information. As
* with the subtransaction state information, we don't bother freeing the
* memory here.
*/
afterTriggers.query_stack = NULL;
afterTriggers.maxquerydepth = 0;
afterTriggers.state = NULL;
/* No more afterTriggers manipulation until next transaction starts. */
afterTriggers.query_depth = -1;
}
/*
* AfterTriggerBeginSubXact()
*
* Start a subtransaction.
*/
void
AfterTriggerBeginSubXact(void)
{
int my_level = GetCurrentTransactionNestLevel();
/*
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* Allocate more space in the trans_stack if needed. (Note: because the
* minimum nest level of a subtransaction is 2, we waste the first couple
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* entries of the array; not worth the notational effort to avoid it.)
*/
while (my_level >= afterTriggers.maxtransdepth)
{
if (afterTriggers.maxtransdepth == 0)
{
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
/* Arbitrarily initialize for max of 8 subtransaction levels */
afterTriggers.trans_stack = (AfterTriggersTransData *)
MemoryContextAlloc(TopTransactionContext,
8 * sizeof(AfterTriggersTransData));
afterTriggers.maxtransdepth = 8;
}
else
{
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
/* repalloc will keep the stack in the same context */
int new_alloc = afterTriggers.maxtransdepth * 2;
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
afterTriggers.trans_stack = (AfterTriggersTransData *)
repalloc(afterTriggers.trans_stack,
new_alloc * sizeof(AfterTriggersTransData));
afterTriggers.maxtransdepth = new_alloc;
}
}
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* Push the current information into the stack. The SET CONSTRAINTS state
* is not saved until/unless changed. Likewise, we don't make a
* per-subtransaction event context until needed.
*/
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
afterTriggers.trans_stack[my_level].state = NULL;
afterTriggers.trans_stack[my_level].events = afterTriggers.events;
afterTriggers.trans_stack[my_level].query_depth = afterTriggers.query_depth;
afterTriggers.trans_stack[my_level].firing_counter = afterTriggers.firing_counter;
}
/*
* AfterTriggerEndSubXact()
*
* The current subtransaction is ending.
*/
void
AfterTriggerEndSubXact(bool isCommit)
{
int my_level = GetCurrentTransactionNestLevel();
SetConstraintState state;
AfterTriggerEvent event;
AfterTriggerEventChunk *chunk;
CommandId subxact_firing_id;
/*
* Pop the prior state if needed.
*/
if (isCommit)
{
Assert(my_level < afterTriggers.maxtransdepth);
/* If we saved a prior state, we don't need it anymore */
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
state = afterTriggers.trans_stack[my_level].state;
if (state != NULL)
pfree(state);
/* this avoids double pfree if error later: */
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
afterTriggers.trans_stack[my_level].state = NULL;
Assert(afterTriggers.query_depth ==
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
afterTriggers.trans_stack[my_level].query_depth);
}
else
{
/*
* Aborting. It is possible subxact start failed before calling
* AfterTriggerBeginSubXact, in which case we mustn't risk touching
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* trans_stack levels that aren't there.
*/
if (my_level >= afterTriggers.maxtransdepth)
return;
/*
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* Release query-level storage for queries being aborted, and restore
* query_depth to its pre-subxact value. This assumes that a
* subtransaction will not add events to query levels started in a
* earlier transaction state.
*/
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
while (afterTriggers.query_depth > afterTriggers.trans_stack[my_level].query_depth)
{
if (afterTriggers.query_depth < afterTriggers.maxquerydepth)
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
AfterTriggerFreeQuery(&afterTriggers.query_stack[afterTriggers.query_depth]);
afterTriggers.query_depth--;
}
Assert(afterTriggers.query_depth ==
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
afterTriggers.trans_stack[my_level].query_depth);
/*
* Restore the global deferred-event list to its former length,
* discarding any events queued by the subxact.
*/
afterTriggerRestoreEventList(&afterTriggers.events,
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
&afterTriggers.trans_stack[my_level].events);
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* Restore the trigger state. If the saved state is NULL, then this
* subxact didn't save it, so it doesn't need restoring.
*/
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
state = afterTriggers.trans_stack[my_level].state;
if (state != NULL)
{
pfree(afterTriggers.state);
afterTriggers.state = state;
}
/* this avoids double pfree if error later: */
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
afterTriggers.trans_stack[my_level].state = NULL;
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* Scan for any remaining deferred events that were marked DONE or IN
* PROGRESS by this subxact or a child, and un-mark them. We can
* recognize such events because they have a firing ID greater than or
* equal to the firing_counter value we saved at subtransaction start.
* (This essentially assumes that the current subxact includes all
* subxacts started after it.)
*/
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
subxact_firing_id = afterTriggers.trans_stack[my_level].firing_counter;
for_each_event_chunk(event, chunk, afterTriggers.events)
{
AfterTriggerShared evtshared = GetTriggerSharedData(event);
if (event->ate_flags &
(AFTER_TRIGGER_DONE | AFTER_TRIGGER_IN_PROGRESS))
{
if (evtshared->ats_firing_id >= subxact_firing_id)
event->ate_flags &=
~(AFTER_TRIGGER_DONE | AFTER_TRIGGER_IN_PROGRESS);
}
}
}
}
/* ----------
* AfterTriggerEnlargeQueryState()
*
* Prepare the necessary state so that we can record AFTER trigger events
* queued by a query. It is allowed to have nested queries within a
* (sub)transaction, so we need to have separate state for each query
* nesting level.
* ----------
*/
static void
AfterTriggerEnlargeQueryState(void)
{
2015-05-24 03:35:49 +02:00
int init_depth = afterTriggers.maxquerydepth;
Assert(afterTriggers.query_depth >= afterTriggers.maxquerydepth);
if (afterTriggers.maxquerydepth == 0)
{
int new_alloc = Max(afterTriggers.query_depth + 1, 8);
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
afterTriggers.query_stack = (AfterTriggersQueryData *)
MemoryContextAlloc(TopTransactionContext,
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
new_alloc * sizeof(AfterTriggersQueryData));
afterTriggers.maxquerydepth = new_alloc;
}
else
{
/* repalloc will keep the stack in the same context */
int old_alloc = afterTriggers.maxquerydepth;
int new_alloc = Max(afterTriggers.query_depth + 1,
old_alloc * 2);
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
afterTriggers.query_stack = (AfterTriggersQueryData *)
repalloc(afterTriggers.query_stack,
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
new_alloc * sizeof(AfterTriggersQueryData));
afterTriggers.maxquerydepth = new_alloc;
}
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
/* Initialize new array entries to empty */
while (init_depth < afterTriggers.maxquerydepth)
{
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
AfterTriggersQueryData *qs = &afterTriggers.query_stack[init_depth];
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
qs->events.head = NULL;
qs->events.tail = NULL;
qs->events.tailfree = NULL;
qs->fdw_tuplestore = NULL;
qs->tables = NIL;
++init_depth;
}
}
/*
* Create an empty SetConstraintState with room for numalloc trigstates
*/
static SetConstraintState
SetConstraintStateCreate(int numalloc)
{
SetConstraintState state;
/* Behave sanely with numalloc == 0 */
if (numalloc <= 0)
numalloc = 1;
/*
* We assume that zeroing will correctly initialize the state values.
*/
state = (SetConstraintState)
MemoryContextAllocZero(TopTransactionContext,
offsetof(SetConstraintStateData, trigstates) +
2015-05-24 03:35:49 +02:00
numalloc * sizeof(SetConstraintTriggerData));
state->numalloc = numalloc;
return state;
}
/*
* Copy a SetConstraintState
*/
static SetConstraintState
SetConstraintStateCopy(SetConstraintState origstate)
{
SetConstraintState state;
state = SetConstraintStateCreate(origstate->numstates);
state->all_isset = origstate->all_isset;
state->all_isdeferred = origstate->all_isdeferred;
state->numstates = origstate->numstates;
memcpy(state->trigstates, origstate->trigstates,
origstate->numstates * sizeof(SetConstraintTriggerData));
return state;
}
/*
* Add a per-trigger item to a SetConstraintState. Returns possibly-changed
* pointer to the state object (it will change if we have to repalloc).
*/
static SetConstraintState
SetConstraintStateAddItem(SetConstraintState state,
Oid tgoid, bool tgisdeferred)
{
if (state->numstates >= state->numalloc)
{
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
int newalloc = state->numalloc * 2;
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
newalloc = Max(newalloc, 8); /* in case original has size 0 */
state = (SetConstraintState)
repalloc(state,
offsetof(SetConstraintStateData, trigstates) +
newalloc * sizeof(SetConstraintTriggerData));
state->numalloc = newalloc;
Assert(state->numstates < state->numalloc);
}
state->trigstates[state->numstates].sct_tgoid = tgoid;
state->trigstates[state->numstates].sct_tgisdeferred = tgisdeferred;
state->numstates++;
return state;
}
/* ----------
* AfterTriggerSetState()
*
* Execute the SET CONSTRAINTS ... utility command.
* ----------
*/
void
AfterTriggerSetState(ConstraintsSetStmt *stmt)
{
int my_level = GetCurrentTransactionNestLevel();
/* If we haven't already done so, initialize our state. */
if (afterTriggers.state == NULL)
afterTriggers.state = SetConstraintStateCreate(8);
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* If in a subtransaction, and we didn't save the current state already,
* save it so it can be restored if the subtransaction aborts.
*/
if (my_level > 1 &&
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
afterTriggers.trans_stack[my_level].state == NULL)
{
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
afterTriggers.trans_stack[my_level].state =
SetConstraintStateCopy(afterTriggers.state);
}
/*
* Handle SET CONSTRAINTS ALL ...
*/
if (stmt->constraints == NIL)
{
/*
* Forget any previous SET CONSTRAINTS commands in this transaction.
*/
afterTriggers.state->numstates = 0;
/*
* Set the per-transaction ALL state to known.
*/
afterTriggers.state->all_isset = true;
afterTriggers.state->all_isdeferred = stmt->deferred;
}
else
{
Relation conrel;
Relation tgrel;
List *conoidlist = NIL;
List *tgoidlist = NIL;
ListCell *lc;
/*
* Handle SET CONSTRAINTS constraint-name [, ...]
*
* First, identify all the named constraints and make a list of their
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
* OIDs. Since, unlike the SQL spec, we allow multiple constraints of
* the same name within a schema, the specifications are not
* necessarily unique. Our strategy is to target all matching
* constraints within the first search-path schema that has any
* matches, but disregard matches in schemas beyond the first match.
* (This is a bit odd but it's the historical behavior.)
*/
conrel = heap_open(ConstraintRelationId, AccessShareLock);
foreach(lc, stmt->constraints)
{
RangeVar *constraint = lfirst(lc);
bool found;
List *namespacelist;
ListCell *nslc;
if (constraint->catalogname)
{
if (strcmp(constraint->catalogname, get_database_name(MyDatabaseId)) != 0)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("cross-database references are not implemented: \"%s.%s.%s\"",
constraint->catalogname, constraint->schemaname,
constraint->relname)));
}
2006-10-04 02:30:14 +02:00
/*
* If we're given the schema name with the constraint, look only
* in that schema. If given a bare constraint name, use the
* search path to find the first matching constraint.
*/
2006-10-04 02:30:14 +02:00
if (constraint->schemaname)
{
Oid namespaceId = LookupExplicitNamespace(constraint->schemaname,
false);
2006-10-04 02:30:14 +02:00
namespacelist = list_make1_oid(namespaceId);
2006-10-04 02:30:14 +02:00
}
else
{
namespacelist = fetch_search_path(true);
}
found = false;
foreach(nslc, namespacelist)
{
Oid namespaceId = lfirst_oid(nslc);
SysScanDesc conscan;
ScanKeyData skey[2];
HeapTuple tup;
ScanKeyInit(&skey[0],
Anum_pg_constraint_conname,
BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_NAMEEQ,
CStringGetDatum(constraint->relname));
ScanKeyInit(&skey[1],
Anum_pg_constraint_connamespace,
BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_OIDEQ,
ObjectIdGetDatum(namespaceId));
conscan = systable_beginscan(conrel, ConstraintNameNspIndexId,
true, NULL, 2, skey);
while (HeapTupleIsValid(tup = systable_getnext(conscan)))
{
Form_pg_constraint con = (Form_pg_constraint) GETSTRUCT(tup);
if (con->condeferrable)
conoidlist = lappend_oid(conoidlist,
HeapTupleGetOid(tup));
else if (stmt->deferred)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE),
errmsg("constraint \"%s\" is not deferrable",
constraint->relname)));
found = true;
}
systable_endscan(conscan);
/*
* Once we've found a matching constraint we do not search
* later parts of the search path.
*/
if (found)
break;
}
list_free(namespacelist);
/*
* Not found ?
*/
if (!found)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_OBJECT),
errmsg("constraint \"%s\" does not exist",
constraint->relname)));
}
heap_close(conrel, AccessShareLock);
/*
* Now, locate the trigger(s) implementing each of these constraints,
* and make a list of their OIDs.
*/
tgrel = heap_open(TriggerRelationId, AccessShareLock);
foreach(lc, conoidlist)
{
Oid conoid = lfirst_oid(lc);
bool found;
ScanKeyData skey;
SysScanDesc tgscan;
HeapTuple htup;
found = false;
ScanKeyInit(&skey,
Anum_pg_trigger_tgconstraint,
BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_OIDEQ,
ObjectIdGetDatum(conoid));
tgscan = systable_beginscan(tgrel, TriggerConstraintIndexId, true,
NULL, 1, &skey);
while (HeapTupleIsValid(htup = systable_getnext(tgscan)))
{
Form_pg_trigger pg_trigger = (Form_pg_trigger) GETSTRUCT(htup);
/*
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
* Silently skip triggers that are marked as non-deferrable in
* pg_trigger. This is not an error condition, since a
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
* deferrable RI constraint may have some non-deferrable
* actions.
*/
if (pg_trigger->tgdeferrable)
tgoidlist = lappend_oid(tgoidlist,
HeapTupleGetOid(htup));
found = true;
}
systable_endscan(tgscan);
/* Safety check: a deferrable constraint should have triggers */
if (!found)
elog(ERROR, "no triggers found for constraint with OID %u",
conoid);
}
heap_close(tgrel, AccessShareLock);
/*
* Now we can set the trigger states of individual triggers for this
* xact.
*/
foreach(lc, tgoidlist)
{
Oid tgoid = lfirst_oid(lc);
SetConstraintState state = afterTriggers.state;
bool found = false;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < state->numstates; i++)
{
if (state->trigstates[i].sct_tgoid == tgoid)
{
state->trigstates[i].sct_tgisdeferred = stmt->deferred;
found = true;
break;
}
}
if (!found)
{
afterTriggers.state =
SetConstraintStateAddItem(state, tgoid, stmt->deferred);
}
}
}
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* SQL99 requires that when a constraint is set to IMMEDIATE, any deferred
* checks against that constraint must be made when the SET CONSTRAINTS
* command is executed -- i.e. the effects of the SET CONSTRAINTS command
* apply retroactively. We've updated the constraints state, so scan the
* list of previously deferred events to fire any that have now become
* immediate.
*
* Obviously, if this was SET ... DEFERRED then it can't have converted
* any unfired events to immediate, so we need do nothing in that case.
*/
if (!stmt->deferred)
{
AfterTriggerEventList *events = &afterTriggers.events;
bool snapshot_set = false;
while (afterTriggerMarkEvents(events, NULL, true))
{
CommandId firing_id = afterTriggers.firing_counter++;
/*
* Make sure a snapshot has been established in case trigger
* functions need one. Note that we avoid setting a snapshot if
* we don't find at least one trigger that has to be fired now.
* This is so that BEGIN; SET CONSTRAINTS ...; SET TRANSACTION
* ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE; ... works properly. (If we are
* at the start of a transaction it's not possible for any trigger
* events to be queued yet.)
*/
if (!snapshot_set)
{
PushActiveSnapshot(GetTransactionSnapshot());
snapshot_set = true;
}
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* We can delete fired events if we are at top transaction level,
* but we'd better not if inside a subtransaction, since the
* subtransaction could later get rolled back.
*/
if (afterTriggerInvokeEvents(events, firing_id, NULL,
!IsSubTransaction()))
break; /* all fired */
}
if (snapshot_set)
PopActiveSnapshot();
}
}
/* ----------
* AfterTriggerPendingOnRel()
* Test to see if there are any pending after-trigger events for rel.
*
* This is used by TRUNCATE, CLUSTER, ALTER TABLE, etc to detect whether
* it is unsafe to perform major surgery on a relation. Note that only
* local pending events are examined. We assume that having exclusive lock
* on a rel guarantees there are no unserviced events in other backends ---
* but having a lock does not prevent there being such events in our own.
*
* In some scenarios it'd be reasonable to remove pending events (more
* specifically, mark them DONE by the current subxact) but without a lot
* of knowledge of the trigger semantics we can't do this in general.
* ----------
*/
bool
AfterTriggerPendingOnRel(Oid relid)
{
AfterTriggerEvent event;
AfterTriggerEventChunk *chunk;
int depth;
/* Scan queued events */
for_each_event_chunk(event, chunk, afterTriggers.events)
{
AfterTriggerShared evtshared = GetTriggerSharedData(event);
/*
* We can ignore completed events. (Even if a DONE flag is rolled
2006-10-04 02:30:14 +02:00
* back by subxact abort, it's OK because the effects of the TRUNCATE
* or whatever must get rolled back too.)
*/
if (event->ate_flags & AFTER_TRIGGER_DONE)
continue;
if (evtshared->ats_relid == relid)
return true;
}
/*
2006-10-04 02:30:14 +02:00
* Also scan events queued by incomplete queries. This could only matter
* if TRUNCATE/etc is executed by a function or trigger within an updating
2006-10-04 02:30:14 +02:00
* query on the same relation, which is pretty perverse, but let's check.
*/
for (depth = 0; depth <= afterTriggers.query_depth && depth < afterTriggers.maxquerydepth; depth++)
{
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
for_each_event_chunk(event, chunk, afterTriggers.query_stack[depth].events)
{
AfterTriggerShared evtshared = GetTriggerSharedData(event);
if (event->ate_flags & AFTER_TRIGGER_DONE)
continue;
if (evtshared->ats_relid == relid)
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
/* ----------
* AfterTriggerSaveEvent()
*
* Called by ExecA[RS]...Triggers() to queue up the triggers that should
* be fired for an event.
*
* NOTE: this is called whenever there are any triggers associated with
* the event (even if they are disabled). This function decides which
* triggers actually need to be queued. It is also called after each row,
* even if there are no triggers for that event, if there are any AFTER
* STATEMENT triggers for the statement which use transition tables, so that
* the transition tuplestores can be built.
*
* Transition tuplestores are built now, rather than when events are pulled
* off of the queue because AFTER ROW triggers are allowed to select from the
* transition tables for the statement.
* ----------
*/
static void
AfterTriggerSaveEvent(EState *estate, ResultRelInfo *relinfo,
int event, bool row_trigger,
HeapTuple oldtup, HeapTuple newtup,
List *recheckIndexes, Bitmapset *modifiedCols,
TransitionCaptureState *transition_capture)
{
Relation rel = relinfo->ri_RelationDesc;
TriggerDesc *trigdesc = relinfo->ri_TrigDesc;
AfterTriggerEventData new_event;
AfterTriggerSharedData new_shared;
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
char relkind = rel->rd_rel->relkind;
int tgtype_event;
int tgtype_level;
int i;
Tuplestorestate *fdw_tuplestore = NULL;
/*
* Check state. We use a normal test not Assert because it is possible to
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
* reach here in the wrong state given misconfigured RI triggers, in
* particular deferring a cascade action trigger.
*/
if (afterTriggers.query_depth < 0)
elog(ERROR, "AfterTriggerSaveEvent() called outside of query");
/* Be sure we have enough space to record events at this query depth. */
if (afterTriggers.query_depth >= afterTriggers.maxquerydepth)
AfterTriggerEnlargeQueryState();
/*
* If the directly named relation has any triggers with transition tables,
* then we need to capture transition tuples.
*/
if (row_trigger && transition_capture != NULL)
{
2017-08-14 23:29:33 +02:00
HeapTuple original_insert_tuple = transition_capture->tcs_original_insert_tuple;
TupleConversionMap *map = transition_capture->tcs_map;
2017-08-14 23:29:33 +02:00
bool delete_old_table = transition_capture->tcs_delete_old_table;
bool update_old_table = transition_capture->tcs_update_old_table;
bool update_new_table = transition_capture->tcs_update_new_table;
bool insert_new_table = transition_capture->tcs_insert_new_table;;
if ((event == TRIGGER_EVENT_DELETE && delete_old_table) ||
(event == TRIGGER_EVENT_UPDATE && update_old_table))
{
Tuplestorestate *old_tuplestore;
Assert(oldtup != NULL);
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
old_tuplestore = transition_capture->tcs_private->old_tuplestore;
if (map != NULL)
{
HeapTuple converted = do_convert_tuple(oldtup, map);
tuplestore_puttuple(old_tuplestore, converted);
pfree(converted);
}
else
tuplestore_puttuple(old_tuplestore, oldtup);
}
if ((event == TRIGGER_EVENT_INSERT && insert_new_table) ||
(event == TRIGGER_EVENT_UPDATE && update_new_table))
{
Tuplestorestate *new_tuplestore;
Assert(newtup != NULL);
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
new_tuplestore = transition_capture->tcs_private->new_tuplestore;
if (original_insert_tuple != NULL)
tuplestore_puttuple(new_tuplestore, original_insert_tuple);
else if (map != NULL)
{
HeapTuple converted = do_convert_tuple(newtup, map);
tuplestore_puttuple(new_tuplestore, converted);
pfree(converted);
}
else
tuplestore_puttuple(new_tuplestore, newtup);
}
/* If transition tables are the only reason we're here, return. */
if (trigdesc == NULL ||
(event == TRIGGER_EVENT_DELETE && !trigdesc->trig_delete_after_row) ||
(event == TRIGGER_EVENT_INSERT && !trigdesc->trig_insert_after_row) ||
(event == TRIGGER_EVENT_UPDATE && !trigdesc->trig_update_after_row))
return;
}
/*
* Validate the event code and collect the associated tuple CTIDs.
*
* The event code will be used both as a bitmask and an array offset, so
* validation is important to make sure we don't walk off the edge of our
* arrays.
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
*
* Also, if we're considering statement-level triggers, check whether we
* already queued a set of them for this event, and cancel the prior set
* if so. This preserves the behavior that statement-level triggers fire
* just once per statement and fire after row-level triggers.
*/
switch (event)
{
case TRIGGER_EVENT_INSERT:
tgtype_event = TRIGGER_TYPE_INSERT;
if (row_trigger)
{
Assert(oldtup == NULL);
Assert(newtup != NULL);
ItemPointerCopy(&(newtup->t_self), &(new_event.ate_ctid1));
ItemPointerSetInvalid(&(new_event.ate_ctid2));
}
else
{
Assert(oldtup == NULL);
Assert(newtup == NULL);
ItemPointerSetInvalid(&(new_event.ate_ctid1));
ItemPointerSetInvalid(&(new_event.ate_ctid2));
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
cancel_prior_stmt_triggers(RelationGetRelid(rel),
CMD_INSERT, event);
}
break;
case TRIGGER_EVENT_DELETE:
tgtype_event = TRIGGER_TYPE_DELETE;
if (row_trigger)
{
Assert(oldtup != NULL);
Assert(newtup == NULL);
ItemPointerCopy(&(oldtup->t_self), &(new_event.ate_ctid1));
ItemPointerSetInvalid(&(new_event.ate_ctid2));
}
else
{
Assert(oldtup == NULL);
Assert(newtup == NULL);
ItemPointerSetInvalid(&(new_event.ate_ctid1));
ItemPointerSetInvalid(&(new_event.ate_ctid2));
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
cancel_prior_stmt_triggers(RelationGetRelid(rel),
CMD_DELETE, event);
}
break;
case TRIGGER_EVENT_UPDATE:
tgtype_event = TRIGGER_TYPE_UPDATE;
if (row_trigger)
{
Assert(oldtup != NULL);
Assert(newtup != NULL);
ItemPointerCopy(&(oldtup->t_self), &(new_event.ate_ctid1));
ItemPointerCopy(&(newtup->t_self), &(new_event.ate_ctid2));
}
else
{
Assert(oldtup == NULL);
Assert(newtup == NULL);
ItemPointerSetInvalid(&(new_event.ate_ctid1));
ItemPointerSetInvalid(&(new_event.ate_ctid2));
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
cancel_prior_stmt_triggers(RelationGetRelid(rel),
CMD_UPDATE, event);
}
break;
case TRIGGER_EVENT_TRUNCATE:
tgtype_event = TRIGGER_TYPE_TRUNCATE;
Assert(oldtup == NULL);
Assert(newtup == NULL);
ItemPointerSetInvalid(&(new_event.ate_ctid1));
ItemPointerSetInvalid(&(new_event.ate_ctid2));
break;
default:
elog(ERROR, "invalid after-trigger event code: %d", event);
tgtype_event = 0; /* keep compiler quiet */
break;
}
if (!(relkind == RELKIND_FOREIGN_TABLE && row_trigger))
new_event.ate_flags = (row_trigger && event == TRIGGER_EVENT_UPDATE) ?
AFTER_TRIGGER_2CTID : AFTER_TRIGGER_1CTID;
/* else, we'll initialize ate_flags for each trigger */
tgtype_level = (row_trigger ? TRIGGER_TYPE_ROW : TRIGGER_TYPE_STATEMENT);
for (i = 0; i < trigdesc->numtriggers; i++)
{
Trigger *trigger = &trigdesc->triggers[i];
if (!TRIGGER_TYPE_MATCHES(trigger->tgtype,
tgtype_level,
TRIGGER_TYPE_AFTER,
tgtype_event))
continue;
if (!TriggerEnabled(estate, relinfo, trigger, event,
modifiedCols, oldtup, newtup))
continue;
if (relkind == RELKIND_FOREIGN_TABLE && row_trigger)
{
if (fdw_tuplestore == NULL)
{
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
fdw_tuplestore = GetCurrentFDWTuplestore();
new_event.ate_flags = AFTER_TRIGGER_FDW_FETCH;
}
else
/* subsequent event for the same tuple */
new_event.ate_flags = AFTER_TRIGGER_FDW_REUSE;
}
/*
* If the trigger is a foreign key enforcement trigger, there are
* certain cases where we can skip queueing the event because we can
* tell by inspection that the FK constraint will still pass.
*/
if (TRIGGER_FIRED_BY_UPDATE(event))
{
switch (RI_FKey_trigger_type(trigger->tgfoid))
{
case RI_TRIGGER_PK:
/* Update on trigger's PK table */
if (!RI_FKey_pk_upd_check_required(trigger, rel,
oldtup, newtup))
{
/* skip queuing this event */
continue;
}
break;
case RI_TRIGGER_FK:
/* Update on trigger's FK table */
if (!RI_FKey_fk_upd_check_required(trigger, rel,
oldtup, newtup))
{
/* skip queuing this event */
continue;
}
break;
2002-09-04 22:31:48 +02:00
case RI_TRIGGER_NONE:
/* Not an FK trigger */
break;
}
}
/*
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
* If the trigger is a deferred unique constraint check trigger, only
* queue it if the unique constraint was potentially violated, which
* we know from index insertion time.
*/
if (trigger->tgfoid == F_UNIQUE_KEY_RECHECK)
{
if (!list_member_oid(recheckIndexes, trigger->tgconstrindid))
continue; /* Uniqueness definitely not violated */
}
/*
* Fill in event structure and add it to the current query's queue.
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
* Note we set ats_table to NULL whenever this trigger doesn't use
* transition tables, to improve sharability of the shared event data.
*/
new_shared.ats_event =
(event & TRIGGER_EVENT_OPMASK) |
(row_trigger ? TRIGGER_EVENT_ROW : 0) |
(trigger->tgdeferrable ? AFTER_TRIGGER_DEFERRABLE : 0) |
(trigger->tginitdeferred ? AFTER_TRIGGER_INITDEFERRED : 0);
new_shared.ats_tgoid = trigger->tgoid;
new_shared.ats_relid = RelationGetRelid(rel);
new_shared.ats_firing_id = 0;
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
if ((trigger->tgoldtable || trigger->tgnewtable) &&
transition_capture != NULL)
new_shared.ats_table = transition_capture->tcs_private;
else
new_shared.ats_table = NULL;
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
afterTriggerAddEvent(&afterTriggers.query_stack[afterTriggers.query_depth].events,
&new_event, &new_shared);
}
/*
* Finally, spool any foreign tuple(s). The tuplestore squashes them to
* minimal tuples, so this loses any system columns. The executor lost
* those columns before us, for an unrelated reason, so this is fine.
*/
if (fdw_tuplestore)
{
if (oldtup != NULL)
tuplestore_puttuple(fdw_tuplestore, oldtup);
if (newtup != NULL)
tuplestore_puttuple(fdw_tuplestore, newtup);
}
}
/*
* Detect whether we already queued BEFORE STATEMENT triggers for the given
* relation + operation, and set the flag so the next call will report "true".
*/
static bool
before_stmt_triggers_fired(Oid relid, CmdType cmdType)
{
bool result;
AfterTriggersTableData *table;
/* Check state, like AfterTriggerSaveEvent. */
if (afterTriggers.query_depth < 0)
elog(ERROR, "before_stmt_triggers_fired() called outside of query");
/* Be sure we have enough space to record events at this query depth. */
if (afterTriggers.query_depth >= afterTriggers.maxquerydepth)
AfterTriggerEnlargeQueryState();
/*
* We keep this state in the AfterTriggersTableData that also holds
* transition tables for the relation + operation. In this way, if we are
* forced to make a new set of transition tables because more tuples get
* entered after we've already fired triggers, we will allow a new set of
* statement triggers to get queued.
*/
table = GetAfterTriggersTableData(relid, cmdType);
result = table->before_trig_done;
table->before_trig_done = true;
return result;
}
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
/*
* If we previously queued a set of AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the given
* relation + operation, and they've not been fired yet, cancel them. The
* caller will queue a fresh set that's after any row-level triggers that may
* have been queued by the current sub-statement, preserving (as much as
* possible) the property that AFTER ROW triggers fire before AFTER STATEMENT
* triggers, and that the latter only fire once. This deals with the
* situation where several FK enforcement triggers sequentially queue triggers
* for the same table into the same trigger query level. We can't fully
* prevent odd behavior though: if there are AFTER ROW triggers taking
* transition tables, we don't want to change the transition tables once the
* first such trigger has seen them. In such a case, any additional events
* will result in creating new transition tables and allowing new firings of
* statement triggers.
*
* This also saves the current event list location so that a later invocation
* of this function can cheaply find the triggers we're about to queue and
* cancel them.
*/
static void
cancel_prior_stmt_triggers(Oid relid, CmdType cmdType, int tgevent)
{
AfterTriggersTableData *table;
AfterTriggersQueryData *qs = &afterTriggers.query_stack[afterTriggers.query_depth];
/*
* We keep this state in the AfterTriggersTableData that also holds
* transition tables for the relation + operation. In this way, if we are
* forced to make a new set of transition tables because more tuples get
* entered after we've already fired triggers, we will allow a new set of
* statement triggers to get queued without canceling the old ones.
*/
table = GetAfterTriggersTableData(relid, cmdType);
if (table->after_trig_done)
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
{
/*
* We want to start scanning from the tail location that existed just
* before we inserted any statement triggers. But the events list
* might've been entirely empty then, in which case scan from the
* current head.
*/
AfterTriggerEvent event;
AfterTriggerEventChunk *chunk;
if (table->after_trig_events.tail)
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
{
chunk = table->after_trig_events.tail;
event = (AfterTriggerEvent) table->after_trig_events.tailfree;
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
}
else
{
chunk = qs->events.head;
event = NULL;
}
for_each_chunk_from(chunk)
{
if (event == NULL)
event = (AfterTriggerEvent) CHUNK_DATA_START(chunk);
for_each_event_from(event, chunk)
{
AfterTriggerShared evtshared = GetTriggerSharedData(event);
/*
* Exit loop when we reach events that aren't AS triggers for
* the target relation.
*/
if (evtshared->ats_relid != relid)
goto done;
if ((evtshared->ats_event & TRIGGER_EVENT_OPMASK) != tgevent)
goto done;
if (!TRIGGER_FIRED_FOR_STATEMENT(evtshared->ats_event))
goto done;
if (!TRIGGER_FIRED_AFTER(evtshared->ats_event))
goto done;
/* OK, mark it DONE */
event->ate_flags &= ~AFTER_TRIGGER_IN_PROGRESS;
event->ate_flags |= AFTER_TRIGGER_DONE;
}
/* signal we must reinitialize event ptr for next chunk */
event = NULL;
}
}
done:
/* In any case, save current insertion point for next time */
table->after_trig_done = true;
table->after_trig_events = qs->events;
Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature. The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it like that. Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls. There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic, so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this happens. Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement, or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one. Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that something worth changing?) Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers. The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout. Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a lot of trouble for a marginal feature. The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures, rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous band-aid patch 3c4359521. In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects of this patch. Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition tables to change post-release. Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
2017-09-16 19:20:32 +02:00
}
/*
* SQL function pg_trigger_depth()
*/
Datum
pg_trigger_depth(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
PG_RETURN_INT32(MyTriggerDepth);
}