rdelaage
/
postgresql
mirror of https://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
postgresql/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_materialized_view.sgml

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

188 lines
6.4 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
<!--
doc/src/sgml/ref/create_materialized_view.sgml
PostgreSQL documentation
-->
Convert SGML IDs to lower case IDs in SGML are case insensitive, and we have accumulated a mix of upper and lower case IDs, including different variants of the same ID. In XML, these will be case sensitive, so we need to fix up those differences. Going to all lower case seems most straightforward, and the current build process already makes all anchors and lower case anyway during the SGML->XML conversion, so this doesn't create any difference in the output right now. A future XML-only build process would, however, maintain any mixed case ID spellings in the output, so that is another reason to clean this up beforehand. Author: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
2017-10-20 03:16:39 +02:00
<refentry id="sql-creatematerializedview">
doc: Improve DocBook XML validity DocBook XML is superficially compatible with DocBook SGML but has a slightly stricter DTD that we have been violating in a few cases. Although XSLT doesn't care whether the document is valid, the style sheets don't necessarily process invalid documents correctly, so we need to work toward fixing this. This first commit moves the indexterms in refentry elements to an allowed position. It has no impact on the output.
2014-02-24 03:25:35 +01:00
<indexterm zone="sql-creatematerializedview">
<primary>CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW</primary>
</indexterm>
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
<refmeta>
<refentrytitle>CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW</refentrytitle>
<manvolnum>7</manvolnum>
<refmiscinfo>SQL - Language Statements</refmiscinfo>
</refmeta>
<refnamediv>
<refname>CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW</refname>
<refpurpose>define a new materialized view</refpurpose>
</refnamediv>
<refsynopsisdiv>
<synopsis>
Add CINE option for CREATE TABLE AS and CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW Fabrízio de Royes Mello reviewed by Rushabh Lathia.
2014-12-13 19:56:09 +01:00
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW [ IF NOT EXISTS ] <replaceable>table_name</replaceable>
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
[ (<replaceable>column_name</replaceable> [, ...] ) ]
tableam: basic documentation. This adds documentation about the user oriented parts of table access methods (i.e. the default_table_access_method GUC and the USING clause for CREATE TABLE etc), adds a basic chapter about the table access method interface, and adds a note to storage.sgml that it's contents don't necessarily apply for non-builtin AMs. Author: Haribabu Kommi and Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180703070645.wchpu5muyto5n647@alap3.anarazel.de
2019-04-04 02:37:00 +02:00
[ USING <replaceable class="parameter">method</replaceable> ]
Use lower-case SGML attribute values for DocBook XML compatibility
2017-10-09 04:00:57 +02:00
[ WITH ( <replaceable class="parameter">storage_parameter</replaceable> [= <replaceable class="parameter">value</replaceable>] [, ... ] ) ]
[ TABLESPACE <replaceable class="parameter">tablespace_name</replaceable> ]
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
AS <replaceable>query</replaceable>
[ WITH [ NO ] DATA ]
</synopsis>
</refsynopsisdiv>
<refsect1>
<title>Description</title>
<para>
<command>CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW</command> defines a materialized view of
a query. The query is executed and used to populate the view at the time
Don't use SGML empty tags For DocBook XML compatibility, don't use SGML empty tags (</>) anymore, replace by the full tag name. Add a warning option to catch future occurrences. Alexander Lakhin, Jürgen Purtz
2017-10-09 03:44:17 +02:00
the command is issued (unless <command>WITH NO DATA</command> is used) and may be
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
refreshed later using <command>REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW</command>.
</para>
<para>
<command>CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW</command> is similar to
Don't use SGML empty tags For DocBook XML compatibility, don't use SGML empty tags (</>) anymore, replace by the full tag name. Add a warning option to catch future occurrences. Alexander Lakhin, Jürgen Purtz
2017-10-09 03:44:17 +02:00
<command>CREATE TABLE AS</command>, except that it also remembers the query used
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
to initialize the view, so that it can be refreshed later upon demand.
Fix problems with incomplete attempt to prohibit OIDS with MVs. Problem with assertion failure in restoring from pg_dump output reported by Joachim Wieland. Review and suggestions by Tom Lane and Robert Haas.
2013-03-22 19:27:34 +01:00
A materialized view has many of the same properties as a table, but there
Remove WITH OIDS support, change oid catalog column visibility. Previously tables declared WITH OIDS, including a significant fraction of the catalog tables, stored the oid column not as a normal column, but as part of the tuple header. This special column was not shown by default, which was somewhat odd, as it's often (consider e.g. pg_class.oid) one of the more important parts of a row. Neither pg_dump nor COPY included the contents of the oid column by default. The fact that the oid column was not an ordinary column necessitated a significant amount of special case code to support oid columns. That already was painful for the existing, but upcoming work aiming to make table storage pluggable, would have required expanding and duplicating that "specialness" significantly. WITH OIDS has been deprecated since 2005 (commit ff02d0a05280e0). Remove it. Removing includes: - CREATE TABLE and ALTER TABLE syntax for declaring the table to be WITH OIDS has been removed (WITH (oids[ = true]) will error out) - pg_dump does not support dumping tables declared WITH OIDS and will issue a warning when dumping one (and ignore the oid column). - restoring an pg_dump archive with pg_restore will warn when restoring a table with oid contents (and ignore the oid column) - COPY will refuse to load binary dump that includes oids. - pg_upgrade will error out when encountering tables declared WITH OIDS, they have to be altered to remove the oid column first. - Functionality to access the oid of the last inserted row (like plpgsql's RESULT_OID, spi's SPI_lastoid, ...) has been removed. The syntax for declaring a table WITHOUT OIDS (or WITH (oids = false) for CREATE TABLE) is still supported. While that requires a bit of support code, it seems unnecessary to break applications / dumps that do not use oids, and are explicit about not using them. The biggest user of WITH OID columns was postgres' catalog. This commit changes all 'magic' oid columns to be columns that are normally declared and stored. To reduce unnecessary query breakage all the newly added columns are still named 'oid', even if a table's column naming scheme would indicate 'reloid' or such. This obviously requires adapting a lot code, mostly replacing oid access via HeapTupleGetOid() with access to the underlying Form_pg_*->oid column. The bootstrap process now assigns oids for all oid columns in genbki.pl that do not have an explicit value (starting at the largest oid previously used), only oids assigned later by oids will be above FirstBootstrapObjectId. As the oid column now is a normal column the special bootstrap syntax for oids has been removed. Oids are not automatically assigned during insertion anymore, all backend code explicitly assigns oids with GetNewOidWithIndex(). For the rare case that insertions into the catalog via SQL are called for the new pg_nextoid() function can be used (which only works on catalog tables). The fact that oid columns on system tables are now normal columns means that they will be included in the set of columns expanded by * (i.e. SELECT * FROM pg_class will now include the table's oid, previously it did not). It'd not technically be hard to hide oid column by default, but that'd mean confusing behavior would either have to be carried forward forever, or it'd cause breakage down the line. While it's not unlikely that further adjustments are needed, the scope/invasiveness of the patch makes it worthwhile to get merge this now. It's painful to maintain externally, too complicated to commit after the code code freeze, and a dependency of a number of other patches. Catversion bump, for obvious reasons. Author: Andres Freund, with contributions by John Naylor Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180930034810.ywp2c7awz7opzcfr@alap3.anarazel.de
2018-11-21 00:36:57 +01:00
is no support for temporary materialized views.
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
</para>
Relax INSERT privilege requirement for CTAS and matviews WITH NO DATA When specified, WITH NO DATA does not insert any data into the relation created, so skip checking for the insert permissions. With WITH DATA or WITH NO DATA, it is always required for the user to have CREATE privileges on the schema targeted for the relation. Note that plain CREATE TABLE AS or CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW queries have begun to work accidentally without INSERT privilege checks as of 874fe3ae, while using EXECUTE or EXPLAIN ANALYZE would fail with the ACL check, so this makes the behavior for all the command flavors consistent with each other. This is arguably a bug fix, but there have been no complaints about the current behavior either so stable branches are not changed. While on it, document properly the privileges requirements for each commands with more tests for all the scenarios possible, and avoid a useless bulk-insert allocation when using WITH NO DATA. Author: Bharath Rupireddy Reviewed-by: Anastasia Lubennikova, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACWc3N8j0_9nMPz9wcAUnVcdKHzFdDZJ3hVFNEbqtcyG9w@mail.gmail.com
2020-11-16 03:52:40 +01:00
<para>
<command>CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW</command> requires
<literal>CREATE</literal> privilege on the schema used for the materialized
Remove INSERT privilege check at table creation of CTAS and matview As per discussion with Peter Eisentraunt, the SQL standard specifies that any tuple insertion done as part of CREATE TABLE AS happens without any extra ACL check, so it makes little sense to keep a check for INSERT privileges when using WITH DATA. Materialized views are not part of the standard, but similarly, this check can be confusing as this refers to an access check on a table created within the same command as the one that would insert data into this table. This commit removes the INSERT privilege check for WITH DATA, the default, that 846005e removed partially, but only for WITH NO DATA. Author: Bharath Rupireddy Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d049c272-9a47-d783-46b0-46665b011598@enterprisedb.com
2020-11-21 11:45:30 +01:00
view.
Relax INSERT privilege requirement for CTAS and matviews WITH NO DATA When specified, WITH NO DATA does not insert any data into the relation created, so skip checking for the insert permissions. With WITH DATA or WITH NO DATA, it is always required for the user to have CREATE privileges on the schema targeted for the relation. Note that plain CREATE TABLE AS or CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW queries have begun to work accidentally without INSERT privilege checks as of 874fe3ae, while using EXECUTE or EXPLAIN ANALYZE would fail with the ACL check, so this makes the behavior for all the command flavors consistent with each other. This is arguably a bug fix, but there have been no complaints about the current behavior either so stable branches are not changed. While on it, document properly the privileges requirements for each commands with more tests for all the scenarios possible, and avoid a useless bulk-insert allocation when using WITH NO DATA. Author: Bharath Rupireddy Reviewed-by: Anastasia Lubennikova, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACWc3N8j0_9nMPz9wcAUnVcdKHzFdDZJ3hVFNEbqtcyG9w@mail.gmail.com
2020-11-16 03:52:40 +01:00
</para>
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
</refsect1>
<refsect1>
<title>Parameters</title>
doc: Fix markup
2014-12-13 20:16:16 +01:00
<variablelist>
Add CINE option for CREATE TABLE AS and CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW Fabrízio de Royes Mello reviewed by Rushabh Lathia.
2014-12-13 19:56:09 +01:00
<varlistentry>
Don't use SGML empty tags For DocBook XML compatibility, don't use SGML empty tags (</>) anymore, replace by the full tag name. Add a warning option to catch future occurrences. Alexander Lakhin, Jürgen Purtz
2017-10-09 03:44:17 +02:00
<term><literal>IF NOT EXISTS</literal></term>
Add CINE option for CREATE TABLE AS and CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW Fabrízio de Royes Mello reviewed by Rushabh Lathia.
2014-12-13 19:56:09 +01:00
<listitem>
<para>
Do not throw an error if a materialized view with the same name already
exists. A notice is issued in this case. Note that there is no guarantee
that the existing materialized view is anything like the one that would
have been created.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable>table_name</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
The name (optionally schema-qualified) of the materialized view to be
Doc: be more precise about conflicts between relation names. Use verbiage like "The name of the table must be distinct from the name of any other relation (table, sequence, index, view, materialized view, or foreign table) in the same schema." in the reference pages for all those object types. The main change here is to mention materialized views explicitly; although a couple of these pages failed to say anything at all about name conflicts. Per suggestion from Daniel Westermann. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZR0P278MB0920D0946509233459AF0DEFD2889@ZR0P278MB0920.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
2021-11-02 17:12:02 +01:00
created. The name must be distinct from the name of any other relation
(table, sequence, index, view, materialized view, or foreign table) in
the same schema.
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable>column_name</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
The name of a column in the new materialized view. If column names are
not provided, they are taken from the output column names of the query.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
tableam: basic documentation. This adds documentation about the user oriented parts of table access methods (i.e. the default_table_access_method GUC and the USING clause for CREATE TABLE etc), adds a basic chapter about the table access method interface, and adds a note to storage.sgml that it's contents don't necessarily apply for non-builtin AMs. Author: Haribabu Kommi and Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180703070645.wchpu5muyto5n647@alap3.anarazel.de
2019-04-04 02:37:00 +02:00
<varlistentry>
<term><literal>USING <replaceable class="parameter">method</replaceable></literal></term>
<listitem>
<para>
This optional clause specifies the table access method to use to store
the contents for the new materialized view; the method needs be an
access method of type <literal>TABLE</literal>. See <xref
linkend="tableam"/> for more information. If this option is not
specified, the default table access method is chosen for the new
materialized view. See <xref linkend="guc-default-table-access-method"/>
for more information.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
<varlistentry>
Use lower-case SGML attribute values for DocBook XML compatibility
2017-10-09 04:00:57 +02:00
<term><literal>WITH ( <replaceable class="parameter">storage_parameter</replaceable> [= <replaceable class="parameter">value</replaceable>] [, ... ] )</literal></term>
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
<listitem>
<para>
This clause specifies optional storage parameters for the new
Doc: fix "Unresolved ID reference" warnings, clean up man page cross-refs. Use xreflabel attributes instead of endterm attributes to control the appearance of links to subsections of SQL command reference pages. This is simpler, it matches what we do elsewhere (e.g. for GUC variables), and it doesn't draw "Unresolved ID reference" warnings from the PDF toolchain. Fix some places where the text was absolutely dependent on an <xref> rendering exactly so, by using a <link> around the required text instead. At least one of those spots had already been turned into bad grammar by subsequent changes, and the whole idea is just too fragile for my taste. <xref> does NOT have fixed output, don't write as if it does. Consistently include a page-level link in cross-man-page references, because otherwise they are useless/nonsensical in man-page output. Likewise, be consistent about mentioning "below" or "above" in same-page references; we were doing that in about 90% of the cases, but now it's 100%. Also get rid of another nonfunctional-in-PDF idea, of making cross-references to functions by sticking ID tags on <row> constructs. We can put the IDs on <indexterm>s instead --- which is probably not any more sensible in abstract terms, but it works where the other doesn't. (There is talk of attaching cross-reference IDs to most or all of the docs' function descriptions, but for now I just fixed the two that exist.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14480.1589154358@sss.pgh.pa.us
2020-05-11 20:15:49 +02:00
materialized view; see
<xref linkend="sql-createtable-storage-parameters"/> in the
<xref linkend="sql-createtable"/> documentation for more
Fix problems with incomplete attempt to prohibit OIDS with MVs. Problem with assertion failure in restoring from pg_dump output reported by Joachim Wieland. Review and suggestions by Tom Lane and Robert Haas.
2013-03-22 19:27:34 +01:00
information. All parameters supported for <literal>CREATE
TABLE</literal> are also supported for <literal>CREATE MATERIALIZED
Remove WITH OIDS support, change oid catalog column visibility. Previously tables declared WITH OIDS, including a significant fraction of the catalog tables, stored the oid column not as a normal column, but as part of the tuple header. This special column was not shown by default, which was somewhat odd, as it's often (consider e.g. pg_class.oid) one of the more important parts of a row. Neither pg_dump nor COPY included the contents of the oid column by default. The fact that the oid column was not an ordinary column necessitated a significant amount of special case code to support oid columns. That already was painful for the existing, but upcoming work aiming to make table storage pluggable, would have required expanding and duplicating that "specialness" significantly. WITH OIDS has been deprecated since 2005 (commit ff02d0a05280e0). Remove it. Removing includes: - CREATE TABLE and ALTER TABLE syntax for declaring the table to be WITH OIDS has been removed (WITH (oids[ = true]) will error out) - pg_dump does not support dumping tables declared WITH OIDS and will issue a warning when dumping one (and ignore the oid column). - restoring an pg_dump archive with pg_restore will warn when restoring a table with oid contents (and ignore the oid column) - COPY will refuse to load binary dump that includes oids. - pg_upgrade will error out when encountering tables declared WITH OIDS, they have to be altered to remove the oid column first. - Functionality to access the oid of the last inserted row (like plpgsql's RESULT_OID, spi's SPI_lastoid, ...) has been removed. The syntax for declaring a table WITHOUT OIDS (or WITH (oids = false) for CREATE TABLE) is still supported. While that requires a bit of support code, it seems unnecessary to break applications / dumps that do not use oids, and are explicit about not using them. The biggest user of WITH OID columns was postgres' catalog. This commit changes all 'magic' oid columns to be columns that are normally declared and stored. To reduce unnecessary query breakage all the newly added columns are still named 'oid', even if a table's column naming scheme would indicate 'reloid' or such. This obviously requires adapting a lot code, mostly replacing oid access via HeapTupleGetOid() with access to the underlying Form_pg_*->oid column. The bootstrap process now assigns oids for all oid columns in genbki.pl that do not have an explicit value (starting at the largest oid previously used), only oids assigned later by oids will be above FirstBootstrapObjectId. As the oid column now is a normal column the special bootstrap syntax for oids has been removed. Oids are not automatically assigned during insertion anymore, all backend code explicitly assigns oids with GetNewOidWithIndex(). For the rare case that insertions into the catalog via SQL are called for the new pg_nextoid() function can be used (which only works on catalog tables). The fact that oid columns on system tables are now normal columns means that they will be included in the set of columns expanded by * (i.e. SELECT * FROM pg_class will now include the table's oid, previously it did not). It'd not technically be hard to hide oid column by default, but that'd mean confusing behavior would either have to be carried forward forever, or it'd cause breakage down the line. While it's not unlikely that further adjustments are needed, the scope/invasiveness of the patch makes it worthwhile to get merge this now. It's painful to maintain externally, too complicated to commit after the code code freeze, and a dependency of a number of other patches. Catversion bump, for obvious reasons. Author: Andres Freund, with contributions by John Naylor Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180930034810.ywp2c7awz7opzcfr@alap3.anarazel.de
2018-11-21 00:36:57 +01:00
VIEW</literal>.
Convert documentation to DocBook XML Since some preparation work had already been done, the only source changes left were changing empty-element tags like <xref linkend="foo"> to <xref linkend="foo"/>, and changing the DOCTYPE. The source files are still named *.sgml, but they are actually XML files now. Renaming could be considered later. In the build system, the intermediate step to convert from SGML to XML is removed. Everything is build straight from the source files again. The OpenSP (or the old SP) package is no longer needed. The documentation toolchain instructions are updated and are much simpler now. Peter Eisentraut, Alexander Lakhin, Jürgen Purtz
2017-11-23 15:39:47 +01:00
See <xref linkend="sql-createtable"/> for more information.
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
Use lower-case SGML attribute values for DocBook XML compatibility
2017-10-09 04:00:57 +02:00
<term><literal>TABLESPACE <replaceable class="parameter">tablespace_name</replaceable></literal></term>
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
<listitem>
<para>
Use lower-case SGML attribute values for DocBook XML compatibility
2017-10-09 04:00:57 +02:00
The <replaceable class="parameter">tablespace_name</replaceable> is the name
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
of the tablespace in which the new materialized view is to be created.
Convert documentation to DocBook XML Since some preparation work had already been done, the only source changes left were changing empty-element tags like <xref linkend="foo"> to <xref linkend="foo"/>, and changing the DOCTYPE. The source files are still named *.sgml, but they are actually XML files now. Renaming could be considered later. In the build system, the intermediate step to convert from SGML to XML is removed. Everything is build straight from the source files again. The OpenSP (or the old SP) package is no longer needed. The documentation toolchain instructions are updated and are much simpler now. Peter Eisentraut, Alexander Lakhin, Jürgen Purtz
2017-11-23 15:39:47 +01:00
If not specified, <xref linkend="guc-default-tablespace"/> is consulted.
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable>query</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
Improve <xref> vs. <command> formatting in the documentation SQL commands are generally marked up as <command>, except when a link to a reference page is used using <xref>. But the latter doesn't create monospace markup, so this looks strange especially when a paragraph contains a mix of links and non-links. We considered putting <command> in the <refentrytitle> on the target side, but that creates some formatting side effects elsewhere. Generally, it seems safer to solve this on the link source side. We can't put the <xref> inside the <command>; the DTD doesn't allow this. DocBook 5 would allow the <command> to have the linkend attribute itself, but we are not there yet. So to solve this for now, convert the <xref>s to <link> plus <command>. This gives the correct look and also gives some more flexibility what we can put into the link text (e.g., subcommands or other clauses). In the future, these could then be converted to DocBook 5 style. I haven't converted absolutely all xrefs to SQL command reference pages, only those where we care about the appearance of the link text or where it was otherwise appropriate to make the appearance match a bit better. Also in some cases, the links where repetitive, so in those cases the links where just removed and replaced by a plain <command>. In cases where we just want the link and don't specifically care about the generated link text (typically phrased "for further information see <xref ...>") the xref is kept. Reported-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/87o8pco34z.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org
2020-10-03 16:16:51 +02:00
A <link linkend="sql-select"><command>SELECT</command></link>, <link linkend="sql-table"><command>TABLE</command></link>,
or <link linkend="sql-values"><command>VALUES</command></link> command. This query will run within a
Switch user ID to the object owner when populating a materialized view. This makes superuser-issued REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW safe regardless of the object's provenance. REINDEX is an earlier example of this pattern. As a downside, functions called from materialized views must tolerate running in a security-restricted operation. CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW need not change user ID. Nonetheless, avoid creation of materialized views that will invariably fail REFRESH by making it, too, start a security-restricted operation. Back-patch to 9.3 so materialized views have this from the beginning. Reviewed by Kevin Grittner.
2013-07-13 00:21:22 +02:00
security-restricted operation; in particular, calls to functions that
themselves create temporary tables will fail.
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
Don't use SGML empty tags For DocBook XML compatibility, don't use SGML empty tags (</>) anymore, replace by the full tag name. Add a warning option to catch future occurrences. Alexander Lakhin, Jürgen Purtz
2017-10-09 03:44:17 +02:00
<term><literal>WITH [ NO ] DATA</literal></term>
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
<listitem>
<para>
This clause specifies whether or not the materialized view should be
populated at creation time. If not, the materialized view will be
flagged as unscannable and cannot be queried until <command>REFRESH
Don't use SGML empty tags For DocBook XML compatibility, don't use SGML empty tags (</>) anymore, replace by the full tag name. Add a warning option to catch future occurrences. Alexander Lakhin, Jürgen Purtz
2017-10-09 03:44:17 +02:00
MATERIALIZED VIEW</command> is used.
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
</refsect1>
<refsect1>
<title>Compatibility</title>
<para>
<command>CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW</command> is a
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> extension.
</para>
</refsect1>
<refsect1>
<title>See Also</title>
<simplelist type="inline">
Convert documentation to DocBook XML Since some preparation work had already been done, the only source changes left were changing empty-element tags like <xref linkend="foo"> to <xref linkend="foo"/>, and changing the DOCTYPE. The source files are still named *.sgml, but they are actually XML files now. Renaming could be considered later. In the build system, the intermediate step to convert from SGML to XML is removed. Everything is build straight from the source files again. The OpenSP (or the old SP) package is no longer needed. The documentation toolchain instructions are updated and are much simpler now. Peter Eisentraut, Alexander Lakhin, Jürgen Purtz
2017-11-23 15:39:47 +01:00
<member><xref linkend="sql-altermaterializedview"/></member>
<member><xref linkend="sql-createtableas"/></member>
<member><xref linkend="sql-createview"/></member>
<member><xref linkend="sql-dropmaterializedview"/></member>
<member><xref linkend="sql-refreshmaterializedview"/></member>
Add a materialized view relations. A materialized view has a rule just like a view and a heap and other physical properties like a table. The rule is only used to populate the table, references in queries refer to the materialized data. This is a minimal implementation, but should still be useful in many cases. Currently data is only populated "on demand" by the CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW statements. It is expected that future releases will add incremental updates with various timings, and that a more refined concept of defining what is "fresh" data will be developed. At some point it may even be possible to have queries use a materialized in place of references to underlying tables, but that requires the other above-mentioned features to be working first. Much of the documentation work by Robert Haas. Review by Noah Misch, Thom Brown, Robert Haas, Marko Tiikkaja Security review by KaiGai Kohei, with a decision on how best to implement sepgsql still pending.
2013-03-04 01:23:31 +01:00
</simplelist>
</refsect1>
</refentry>