postgresql/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_procedure.sgml

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

412 lines
15 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

<!--
doc/src/sgml/ref/create_procedure.sgml
PostgreSQL documentation
-->
<refentry id="sql-createprocedure">
<indexterm zone="sql-createprocedure">
<primary>CREATE PROCEDURE</primary>
</indexterm>
<refmeta>
<refentrytitle>CREATE PROCEDURE</refentrytitle>
<manvolnum>7</manvolnum>
<refmiscinfo>SQL - Language Statements</refmiscinfo>
</refmeta>
<refnamediv>
<refname>CREATE PROCEDURE</refname>
<refpurpose>define a new procedure</refpurpose>
</refnamediv>
<refsynopsisdiv>
<synopsis>
CREATE [ OR REPLACE ] PROCEDURE
<replaceable class="parameter">name</replaceable> ( [ [ <replaceable class="parameter">argmode</replaceable> ] [ <replaceable class="parameter">argname</replaceable> ] <replaceable class="parameter">argtype</replaceable> [ { DEFAULT | = } <replaceable class="parameter">default_expr</replaceable> ] [, ...] ] )
{ LANGUAGE <replaceable class="parameter">lang_name</replaceable>
| TRANSFORM { FOR TYPE <replaceable class="parameter">type_name</replaceable> } [, ... ]
| [ EXTERNAL ] SECURITY INVOKER | [ EXTERNAL ] SECURITY DEFINER
| SET <replaceable class="parameter">configuration_parameter</replaceable> { TO <replaceable class="parameter">value</replaceable> | = <replaceable class="parameter">value</replaceable> | FROM CURRENT }
| AS '<replaceable class="parameter">definition</replaceable>'
| AS '<replaceable class="parameter">obj_file</replaceable>', '<replaceable class="parameter">link_symbol</replaceable>'
SQL-standard function body This adds support for writing CREATE FUNCTION and CREATE PROCEDURE statements for language SQL with a function body that conforms to the SQL standard and is portable to other implementations. Instead of the PostgreSQL-specific AS $$ string literal $$ syntax, this allows writing out the SQL statements making up the body unquoted, either as a single statement: CREATE FUNCTION add(a integer, b integer) RETURNS integer LANGUAGE SQL RETURN a + b; or as a block CREATE PROCEDURE insert_data(a integer, b integer) LANGUAGE SQL BEGIN ATOMIC INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (a); INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (b); END; The function body is parsed at function definition time and stored as expression nodes in a new pg_proc column prosqlbody. So at run time, no further parsing is required. However, this form does not support polymorphic arguments, because there is no more parse analysis done at call time. Dependencies between the function and the objects it uses are fully tracked. A new RETURN statement is introduced. This can only be used inside function bodies. Internally, it is treated much like a SELECT statement. psql needs some new intelligence to keep track of function body boundaries so that it doesn't send off statements when it sees semicolons that are inside a function body. Tested-by: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1c11f1eb-f00c-43b7-799d-2d44132c02d7@2ndquadrant.com
2021-04-07 21:30:08 +02:00
| <replaceable class="parameter">sql_body</replaceable>
} ...
</synopsis>
</refsynopsisdiv>
<refsect1 id="sql-createprocedure-description">
<title>Description</title>
<para>
<command>CREATE PROCEDURE</command> defines a new procedure.
<command>CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE</command> will either create a
new procedure, or replace an existing definition.
To be able to define a procedure, the user must have the
<literal>USAGE</literal> privilege on the language.
</para>
<para>
If a schema name is included, then the procedure is created in the
specified schema. Otherwise it is created in the current schema.
The name of the new procedure must not match any existing procedure or function
with the same input argument types in the same schema. However,
procedures and functions of different argument types can share a name (this is
called <firstterm>overloading</firstterm>).
</para>
<para>
To replace the current definition of an existing procedure, use
<command>CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE</command>. It is not possible
to change the name or argument types of a procedure this way (if you
tried, you would actually be creating a new, distinct procedure).
</para>
<para>
When <command>CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE</command> is used to replace an
existing procedure, the ownership and permissions of the procedure
do not change. All other procedure properties are assigned the
values specified or implied in the command. You must own the procedure
to replace it (this includes being a member of the owning role).
</para>
<para>
The user that creates the procedure becomes the owner of the procedure.
</para>
<para>
To be able to create a procedure, you must have <literal>USAGE</literal>
privilege on the argument types.
</para>
<para>
Refer to <xref linkend="xproc"/> for further information on writing
procedures.
</para>
</refsect1>
<refsect1>
<title>Parameters</title>
<variablelist>
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable class="parameter">name</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
The name (optionally schema-qualified) of the procedure to create.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable class="parameter">argmode</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
The mode of an argument: <literal>IN</literal>, <literal>OUT</literal>,
<literal>INOUT</literal>, or <literal>VARIADIC</literal>. If omitted,
the default is <literal>IN</literal>.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable class="parameter">argname</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
The name of an argument.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable class="parameter">argtype</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
The data type(s) of the procedure's arguments (optionally
schema-qualified), if any. The argument types can be base, composite,
or domain types, or can reference the type of a table column.
</para>
<para>
Depending on the implementation language it might also be allowed
to specify <quote>pseudo-types</quote> such as <type>cstring</type>.
Pseudo-types indicate that the actual argument type is either
incompletely specified, or outside the set of ordinary SQL data types.
</para>
<para>
The type of a column is referenced by writing
<literal><replaceable
class="parameter">table_name</replaceable>.<replaceable
class="parameter">column_name</replaceable>%TYPE</literal>.
Using this feature can sometimes help make a procedure independent of
changes to the definition of a table.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable class="parameter">default_expr</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
An expression to be used as default value if the parameter is
not specified. The expression has to be coercible to the
argument type of the parameter.
All input parameters following a
parameter with a default value must have default values as well.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable class="parameter">lang_name</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
The name of the language that the procedure is implemented in.
It can be <literal>sql</literal>, <literal>c</literal>,
<literal>internal</literal>, or the name of a user-defined
SQL-standard function body This adds support for writing CREATE FUNCTION and CREATE PROCEDURE statements for language SQL with a function body that conforms to the SQL standard and is portable to other implementations. Instead of the PostgreSQL-specific AS $$ string literal $$ syntax, this allows writing out the SQL statements making up the body unquoted, either as a single statement: CREATE FUNCTION add(a integer, b integer) RETURNS integer LANGUAGE SQL RETURN a + b; or as a block CREATE PROCEDURE insert_data(a integer, b integer) LANGUAGE SQL BEGIN ATOMIC INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (a); INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (b); END; The function body is parsed at function definition time and stored as expression nodes in a new pg_proc column prosqlbody. So at run time, no further parsing is required. However, this form does not support polymorphic arguments, because there is no more parse analysis done at call time. Dependencies between the function and the objects it uses are fully tracked. A new RETURN statement is introduced. This can only be used inside function bodies. Internally, it is treated much like a SELECT statement. psql needs some new intelligence to keep track of function body boundaries so that it doesn't send off statements when it sees semicolons that are inside a function body. Tested-by: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1c11f1eb-f00c-43b7-799d-2d44132c02d7@2ndquadrant.com
2021-04-07 21:30:08 +02:00
procedural language, e.g., <literal>plpgsql</literal>. The default is
<literal>sql</literal> if <replaceable
class="parameter">sql_body</replaceable> is specified. Enclosing the
name in single quotes is deprecated and requires matching case.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><literal>TRANSFORM { FOR TYPE <replaceable class="parameter">type_name</replaceable> } [, ... ] }</literal></term>
<listitem>
<para>
Lists which transforms a call to the procedure should apply. Transforms
convert between SQL types and language-specific data types;
see <xref linkend="sql-createtransform"/>. Procedural language
implementations usually have hardcoded knowledge of the built-in types,
so those don't need to be listed here. If a procedural language
implementation does not know how to handle a type and no transform is
supplied, it will fall back to a default behavior for converting data
types, but this depends on the implementation.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><literal><optional>EXTERNAL</optional> SECURITY INVOKER</literal></term>
<term><literal><optional>EXTERNAL</optional> SECURITY DEFINER</literal></term>
<listitem>
<para><literal>SECURITY INVOKER</literal> indicates that the procedure
is to be executed with the privileges of the user that calls it.
That is the default. <literal>SECURITY DEFINER</literal>
specifies that the procedure is to be executed with the
privileges of the user that owns it.
</para>
<para>
The key word <literal>EXTERNAL</literal> is allowed for SQL
conformance, but it is optional since, unlike in SQL, this feature
applies to all procedures not only external ones.
</para>
<para>
A <literal>SECURITY DEFINER</literal> procedure cannot execute
transaction control statements (for example, <command>COMMIT</command>
and <command>ROLLBACK</command>, depending on the language).
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable>configuration_parameter</replaceable></term>
<term><replaceable>value</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
The <literal>SET</literal> clause causes the specified configuration
parameter to be set to the specified value when the procedure is
entered, and then restored to its prior value when the procedure exits.
<literal>SET FROM CURRENT</literal> saves the value of the parameter that
is current when <command>CREATE PROCEDURE</command> is executed as the value
to be applied when the procedure is entered.
</para>
<para>
If a <literal>SET</literal> clause is attached to a procedure, then
the effects of a <command>SET LOCAL</command> command executed inside the
procedure for the same variable are restricted to the procedure: the
configuration parameter's prior value is still restored at procedure exit.
However, an ordinary
<command>SET</command> command (without <literal>LOCAL</literal>) overrides the
<literal>SET</literal> clause, much as it would do for a previous <command>SET
LOCAL</command> command: the effects of such a command will persist after
procedure exit, unless the current transaction is rolled back.
</para>
Transaction control in PL procedures In each of the supplied procedural languages (PL/pgSQL, PL/Perl, PL/Python, PL/Tcl), add language-specific commit and rollback functions/commands to control transactions in procedures in that language. Add similar underlying functions to SPI. Some additional cleanup so that transaction commit or abort doesn't blow away data structures still used by the procedure call. Add execution context tracking to CALL and DO statements so that transaction control commands can only be issued in top-level procedure and block calls, not function calls or other procedure or block calls. - SPI Add a new function SPI_connect_ext() that is like SPI_connect() but allows passing option flags. The only option flag right now is SPI_OPT_NONATOMIC. A nonatomic SPI connection can execute transaction control commands, otherwise it's not allowed. This is meant to be passed down from CALL and DO statements which themselves know in which context they are called. A nonatomic SPI connection uses different memory management. A normal SPI connection allocates its memory in TopTransactionContext. For nonatomic connections we use PortalContext instead. As the comment in SPI_connect_ext() (previously SPI_connect()) indicates, one could potentially use PortalContext in all cases, but it seems safest to leave the existing uses alone, because this stuff is complicated enough already. SPI also gets new functions SPI_start_transaction(), SPI_commit(), and SPI_rollback(), which can be used by PLs to implement their transaction control logic. - portalmem.c Some adjustments were made in the code that cleans up portals at transaction abort. The portal code could already handle a command *committing* a transaction and continuing (e.g., VACUUM), but it was not quite prepared for a command *aborting* a transaction and continuing. In AtAbort_Portals(), remove the code that marks an active portal as failed. As the comment there already predicted, this doesn't work if the running command wants to keep running after transaction abort. And it's actually not necessary, because pquery.c is careful to run all portal code in a PG_TRY block and explicitly runs MarkPortalFailed() if there is an exception. So the code in AtAbort_Portals() is never used anyway. In AtAbort_Portals() and AtCleanup_Portals(), we need to be careful not to clean up active portals too much. This mirrors similar code in PreCommit_Portals(). - PL/Perl Gets new functions spi_commit() and spi_rollback() - PL/pgSQL Gets new commands COMMIT and ROLLBACK. Update the PL/SQL porting example in the documentation to reflect that transactions are now possible in procedures. - PL/Python Gets new functions plpy.commit and plpy.rollback. - PL/Tcl Gets new commands commit and rollback. Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
2018-01-22 14:30:16 +01:00
<para>
If a <literal>SET</literal> clause is attached to a procedure, then
that procedure cannot execute transaction control statements (for
example, <command>COMMIT</command> and <command>ROLLBACK</command>,
depending on the language).
</para>
<para>
See <xref linkend="sql-set"/> and
<xref linkend="runtime-config"/>
for more information about allowed parameter names and values.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable class="parameter">definition</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
A string constant defining the procedure; the meaning depends on the
language. It can be an internal procedure name, the path to an
object file, an SQL command, or text in a procedural language.
</para>
<para>
It is often helpful to use dollar quoting (see <xref
linkend="sql-syntax-dollar-quoting"/>) to write the procedure definition
string, rather than the normal single quote syntax. Without dollar
quoting, any single quotes or backslashes in the procedure definition must
be escaped by doubling them.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><literal><replaceable class="parameter">obj_file</replaceable>, <replaceable class="parameter">link_symbol</replaceable></literal></term>
<listitem>
<para>
This form of the <literal>AS</literal> clause is used for
dynamically loadable C language procedures when the procedure name
in the C language source code is not the same as the name of
the SQL procedure. The string <replaceable
class="parameter">obj_file</replaceable> is the name of the shared
library file containing the compiled C procedure, and is interpreted
Improve <xref> vs. <command> formatting in the documentation SQL commands are generally marked up as <command>, except when a link to a reference page is used using <xref>. But the latter doesn't create monospace markup, so this looks strange especially when a paragraph contains a mix of links and non-links. We considered putting <command> in the <refentrytitle> on the target side, but that creates some formatting side effects elsewhere. Generally, it seems safer to solve this on the link source side. We can't put the <xref> inside the <command>; the DTD doesn't allow this. DocBook 5 would allow the <command> to have the linkend attribute itself, but we are not there yet. So to solve this for now, convert the <xref>s to <link> plus <command>. This gives the correct look and also gives some more flexibility what we can put into the link text (e.g., subcommands or other clauses). In the future, these could then be converted to DocBook 5 style. I haven't converted absolutely all xrefs to SQL command reference pages, only those where we care about the appearance of the link text or where it was otherwise appropriate to make the appearance match a bit better. Also in some cases, the links where repetitive, so in those cases the links where just removed and replaced by a plain <command>. In cases where we just want the link and don't specifically care about the generated link text (typically phrased "for further information see <xref ...>") the xref is kept. Reported-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/87o8pco34z.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org
2020-10-03 16:16:51 +02:00
as for the <link linkend="sql-load"><command>LOAD</command></link> command. The string
<replaceable class="parameter">link_symbol</replaceable> is the
procedure's link symbol, that is, the name of the procedure in the C
language source code. If the link symbol is omitted, it is assumed
to be the same as the name of the SQL procedure being defined.
</para>
<para>
When repeated <command>CREATE PROCEDURE</command> calls refer to
the same object file, the file is only loaded once per session.
To unload and
reload the file (perhaps during development), start a new session.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
SQL-standard function body This adds support for writing CREATE FUNCTION and CREATE PROCEDURE statements for language SQL with a function body that conforms to the SQL standard and is portable to other implementations. Instead of the PostgreSQL-specific AS $$ string literal $$ syntax, this allows writing out the SQL statements making up the body unquoted, either as a single statement: CREATE FUNCTION add(a integer, b integer) RETURNS integer LANGUAGE SQL RETURN a + b; or as a block CREATE PROCEDURE insert_data(a integer, b integer) LANGUAGE SQL BEGIN ATOMIC INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (a); INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (b); END; The function body is parsed at function definition time and stored as expression nodes in a new pg_proc column prosqlbody. So at run time, no further parsing is required. However, this form does not support polymorphic arguments, because there is no more parse analysis done at call time. Dependencies between the function and the objects it uses are fully tracked. A new RETURN statement is introduced. This can only be used inside function bodies. Internally, it is treated much like a SELECT statement. psql needs some new intelligence to keep track of function body boundaries so that it doesn't send off statements when it sees semicolons that are inside a function body. Tested-by: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1c11f1eb-f00c-43b7-799d-2d44132c02d7@2ndquadrant.com
2021-04-07 21:30:08 +02:00
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable class="parameter">sql_body</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
The body of a <literal>LANGUAGE SQL</literal> procedure. This should
be a block
<programlisting>
BEGIN ATOMIC
<replaceable>statement</replaceable>;
<replaceable>statement</replaceable>;
...
<replaceable>statement</replaceable>;
END
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
This is similar to writing the text of the procedure body as a string
constant (see <replaceable>definition</replaceable> above), but there
are some differences: This form only works for <literal>LANGUAGE
SQL</literal>, the string constant form works for all languages. This
form is parsed at procedure definition time, the string constant form is
parsed at execution time; therefore this form cannot support
polymorphic argument types and other constructs that are not resolvable
at procedure definition time. This form tracks dependencies between the
procedure and objects used in the procedure body, so <literal>DROP
... CASCADE</literal> will work correctly, whereas the form using
string literals may leave dangling procedures. Finally, this form is
more compatible with the SQL standard and other SQL implementations.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
</refsect1>
<refsect1 id="sql-createprocedure-notes">
<title>Notes</title>
<para>
See <xref linkend="sql-createfunction"/> for more details on function
creation that also apply to procedures.
</para>
<para>
Use <xref linkend="sql-call"/> to execute a procedure.
</para>
</refsect1>
<refsect1 id="sql-createprocedure-examples">
<title>Examples</title>
SQL-standard function body This adds support for writing CREATE FUNCTION and CREATE PROCEDURE statements for language SQL with a function body that conforms to the SQL standard and is portable to other implementations. Instead of the PostgreSQL-specific AS $$ string literal $$ syntax, this allows writing out the SQL statements making up the body unquoted, either as a single statement: CREATE FUNCTION add(a integer, b integer) RETURNS integer LANGUAGE SQL RETURN a + b; or as a block CREATE PROCEDURE insert_data(a integer, b integer) LANGUAGE SQL BEGIN ATOMIC INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (a); INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (b); END; The function body is parsed at function definition time and stored as expression nodes in a new pg_proc column prosqlbody. So at run time, no further parsing is required. However, this form does not support polymorphic arguments, because there is no more parse analysis done at call time. Dependencies between the function and the objects it uses are fully tracked. A new RETURN statement is introduced. This can only be used inside function bodies. Internally, it is treated much like a SELECT statement. psql needs some new intelligence to keep track of function body boundaries so that it doesn't send off statements when it sees semicolons that are inside a function body. Tested-by: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1c11f1eb-f00c-43b7-799d-2d44132c02d7@2ndquadrant.com
2021-04-07 21:30:08 +02:00
<para>
<programlisting>
CREATE PROCEDURE insert_data(a integer, b integer)
LANGUAGE SQL
AS $$
INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (a);
INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (b);
$$;
SQL-standard function body This adds support for writing CREATE FUNCTION and CREATE PROCEDURE statements for language SQL with a function body that conforms to the SQL standard and is portable to other implementations. Instead of the PostgreSQL-specific AS $$ string literal $$ syntax, this allows writing out the SQL statements making up the body unquoted, either as a single statement: CREATE FUNCTION add(a integer, b integer) RETURNS integer LANGUAGE SQL RETURN a + b; or as a block CREATE PROCEDURE insert_data(a integer, b integer) LANGUAGE SQL BEGIN ATOMIC INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (a); INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (b); END; The function body is parsed at function definition time and stored as expression nodes in a new pg_proc column prosqlbody. So at run time, no further parsing is required. However, this form does not support polymorphic arguments, because there is no more parse analysis done at call time. Dependencies between the function and the objects it uses are fully tracked. A new RETURN statement is introduced. This can only be used inside function bodies. Internally, it is treated much like a SELECT statement. psql needs some new intelligence to keep track of function body boundaries so that it doesn't send off statements when it sees semicolons that are inside a function body. Tested-by: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1c11f1eb-f00c-43b7-799d-2d44132c02d7@2ndquadrant.com
2021-04-07 21:30:08 +02:00
</programlisting>
or
<programlisting>
CREATE PROCEDURE insert_data(a integer, b integer)
LANGUAGE SQL
BEGIN ATOMIC
INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (a);
INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (b);
END;
</programlisting>
and call like this:
<programlisting>
CALL insert_data(1, 2);
</programlisting></para>
</refsect1>
<refsect1 id="sql-createprocedure-compat">
<title>Compatibility</title>
<para>
A <command>CREATE PROCEDURE</command> command is defined in the SQL
SQL-standard function body This adds support for writing CREATE FUNCTION and CREATE PROCEDURE statements for language SQL with a function body that conforms to the SQL standard and is portable to other implementations. Instead of the PostgreSQL-specific AS $$ string literal $$ syntax, this allows writing out the SQL statements making up the body unquoted, either as a single statement: CREATE FUNCTION add(a integer, b integer) RETURNS integer LANGUAGE SQL RETURN a + b; or as a block CREATE PROCEDURE insert_data(a integer, b integer) LANGUAGE SQL BEGIN ATOMIC INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (a); INSERT INTO tbl VALUES (b); END; The function body is parsed at function definition time and stored as expression nodes in a new pg_proc column prosqlbody. So at run time, no further parsing is required. However, this form does not support polymorphic arguments, because there is no more parse analysis done at call time. Dependencies between the function and the objects it uses are fully tracked. A new RETURN statement is introduced. This can only be used inside function bodies. Internally, it is treated much like a SELECT statement. psql needs some new intelligence to keep track of function body boundaries so that it doesn't send off statements when it sees semicolons that are inside a function body. Tested-by: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1c11f1eb-f00c-43b7-799d-2d44132c02d7@2ndquadrant.com
2021-04-07 21:30:08 +02:00
standard. The <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> implementation can be
used in a compatible way but has many extensions. For details see also
<xref linkend="sql-createfunction"/>.
</para>
</refsect1>
<refsect1>
<title>See Also</title>
<simplelist type="inline">
<member><xref linkend="sql-alterprocedure"/></member>
<member><xref linkend="sql-dropprocedure"/></member>
<member><xref linkend="sql-call"/></member>
<member><xref linkend="sql-createfunction"/></member>
</simplelist>
</refsect1>
</refentry>