postgresql/src/test/regress/expected/date.out

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

1535 lines
31 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

--
-- DATE
--
CREATE TABLE DATE_TBL (f1 date);
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1957-04-09');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1957-06-13');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1996-02-28');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1996-02-29');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1996-03-01');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1996-03-02');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1997-02-28');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1997-02-29');
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "1997-02-29"
LINE 1: INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1997-02-29');
^
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1997-03-01');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('1997-03-02');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('2000-04-01');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('2000-04-02');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('2000-04-03');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('2038-04-08');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('2039-04-09');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('2040-04-10');
INSERT INTO DATE_TBL VALUES ('2040-04-10 BC');
SELECT f1 FROM DATE_TBL;
f1
---------------
04-09-1957
06-13-1957
02-28-1996
02-29-1996
03-01-1996
03-02-1996
02-28-1997
03-01-1997
03-02-1997
04-01-2000
04-02-2000
04-03-2000
04-08-2038
04-09-2039
04-10-2040
04-10-2040 BC
(16 rows)
SELECT f1 FROM DATE_TBL WHERE f1 < '2000-01-01';
f1
---------------
04-09-1957
06-13-1957
02-28-1996
02-29-1996
03-01-1996
03-02-1996
02-28-1997
03-01-1997
03-02-1997
04-10-2040 BC
(10 rows)
SELECT f1 FROM DATE_TBL
WHERE f1 BETWEEN '2000-01-01' AND '2001-01-01';
f1
------------
04-01-2000
04-02-2000
04-03-2000
(3 rows)
--
-- Check all the documented input formats
--
SET datestyle TO iso; -- display results in ISO
SET datestyle TO ymd;
SELECT date 'January 8, 1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '1999-01-08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '1999-01-18';
date
------------
1999-01-18
(1 row)
SELECT date '1/8/1999';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "1/8/1999"
LINE 1: SELECT date '1/8/1999';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '1/18/1999';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "1/18/1999"
LINE 1: SELECT date '1/18/1999';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '18/1/1999';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "18/1/1999"
LINE 1: SELECT date '18/1/1999';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '01/02/03';
date
------------
2001-02-03
(1 row)
SELECT date '19990108';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '990108';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '1999.008';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date 'J2451187';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date 'January 8, 99 BC';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "January 8, 99 BC"
LINE 1: SELECT date 'January 8, 99 BC';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '99-Jan-08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '1999-Jan-08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '08-Jan-99';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "08-Jan-99"
LINE 1: SELECT date '08-Jan-99';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '08-Jan-1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date 'Jan-08-99';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "Jan-08-99"
LINE 1: SELECT date 'Jan-08-99';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date 'Jan-08-1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '99-08-Jan';
ERROR: invalid input syntax for type date: "99-08-Jan"
LINE 1: SELECT date '99-08-Jan';
^
SELECT date '1999-08-Jan';
ERROR: invalid input syntax for type date: "1999-08-Jan"
LINE 1: SELECT date '1999-08-Jan';
^
SELECT date '99 Jan 08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '1999 Jan 08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '08 Jan 99';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "08 Jan 99"
LINE 1: SELECT date '08 Jan 99';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '08 Jan 1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date 'Jan 08 99';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "Jan 08 99"
LINE 1: SELECT date 'Jan 08 99';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date 'Jan 08 1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '99 08 Jan';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '1999 08 Jan';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '99-01-08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '1999-01-08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '08-01-99';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "08-01-99"
LINE 1: SELECT date '08-01-99';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '08-01-1999';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "08-01-1999"
LINE 1: SELECT date '08-01-1999';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '01-08-99';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "01-08-99"
LINE 1: SELECT date '01-08-99';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '01-08-1999';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "01-08-1999"
LINE 1: SELECT date '01-08-1999';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '99-08-01';
date
------------
1999-08-01
(1 row)
SELECT date '1999-08-01';
date
------------
1999-08-01
(1 row)
SELECT date '99 01 08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '1999 01 08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '08 01 99';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "08 01 99"
LINE 1: SELECT date '08 01 99';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '08 01 1999';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "08 01 1999"
LINE 1: SELECT date '08 01 1999';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '01 08 99';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "01 08 99"
LINE 1: SELECT date '01 08 99';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '01 08 1999';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "01 08 1999"
LINE 1: SELECT date '01 08 1999';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '99 08 01';
date
------------
1999-08-01
(1 row)
SELECT date '1999 08 01';
date
------------
1999-08-01
(1 row)
SET datestyle TO dmy;
SELECT date 'January 8, 1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '1999-01-08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '1999-01-18';
date
------------
1999-01-18
(1 row)
SELECT date '1/8/1999';
date
------------
1999-08-01
(1 row)
SELECT date '1/18/1999';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "1/18/1999"
LINE 1: SELECT date '1/18/1999';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '18/1/1999';
date
------------
1999-01-18
(1 row)
SELECT date '01/02/03';
date
------------
2003-02-01
(1 row)
SELECT date '19990108';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '990108';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '1999.008';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date 'J2451187';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date 'January 8, 99 BC';
date
---------------
0099-01-08 BC
(1 row)
SELECT date '99-Jan-08';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "99-Jan-08"
LINE 1: SELECT date '99-Jan-08';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '1999-Jan-08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '08-Jan-99';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '08-Jan-1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date 'Jan-08-99';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date 'Jan-08-1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '99-08-Jan';
ERROR: invalid input syntax for type date: "99-08-Jan"
LINE 1: SELECT date '99-08-Jan';
^
SELECT date '1999-08-Jan';
ERROR: invalid input syntax for type date: "1999-08-Jan"
LINE 1: SELECT date '1999-08-Jan';
^
SELECT date '99 Jan 08';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "99 Jan 08"
LINE 1: SELECT date '99 Jan 08';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '1999 Jan 08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '08 Jan 99';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '08 Jan 1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date 'Jan 08 99';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date 'Jan 08 1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '99 08 Jan';
ERROR: invalid input syntax for type date: "99 08 Jan"
LINE 1: SELECT date '99 08 Jan';
^
SELECT date '1999 08 Jan';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '99-01-08';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "99-01-08"
LINE 1: SELECT date '99-01-08';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '1999-01-08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '08-01-99';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '08-01-1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '01-08-99';
date
------------
1999-08-01
(1 row)
SELECT date '01-08-1999';
date
------------
1999-08-01
(1 row)
SELECT date '99-08-01';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "99-08-01"
LINE 1: SELECT date '99-08-01';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '1999-08-01';
date
------------
1999-08-01
(1 row)
SELECT date '99 01 08';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "99 01 08"
LINE 1: SELECT date '99 01 08';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '1999 01 08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '08 01 99';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '08 01 1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '01 08 99';
date
------------
1999-08-01
(1 row)
SELECT date '01 08 1999';
date
------------
1999-08-01
(1 row)
SELECT date '99 08 01';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "99 08 01"
LINE 1: SELECT date '99 08 01';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '1999 08 01';
date
------------
1999-08-01
(1 row)
SET datestyle TO mdy;
SELECT date 'January 8, 1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '1999-01-08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '1999-01-18';
date
------------
1999-01-18
(1 row)
SELECT date '1/8/1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '1/18/1999';
date
------------
1999-01-18
(1 row)
SELECT date '18/1/1999';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "18/1/1999"
LINE 1: SELECT date '18/1/1999';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '01/02/03';
date
------------
2003-01-02
(1 row)
SELECT date '19990108';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '990108';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '1999.008';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date 'J2451187';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date 'January 8, 99 BC';
date
---------------
0099-01-08 BC
(1 row)
SELECT date '99-Jan-08';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "99-Jan-08"
LINE 1: SELECT date '99-Jan-08';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '1999-Jan-08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '08-Jan-99';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '08-Jan-1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date 'Jan-08-99';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date 'Jan-08-1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '99-08-Jan';
ERROR: invalid input syntax for type date: "99-08-Jan"
LINE 1: SELECT date '99-08-Jan';
^
SELECT date '1999-08-Jan';
ERROR: invalid input syntax for type date: "1999-08-Jan"
LINE 1: SELECT date '1999-08-Jan';
^
SELECT date '99 Jan 08';
ERROR: invalid input syntax for type date: "99 Jan 08"
LINE 1: SELECT date '99 Jan 08';
^
SELECT date '1999 Jan 08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '08 Jan 99';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '08 Jan 1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date 'Jan 08 99';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date 'Jan 08 1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '99 08 Jan';
ERROR: invalid input syntax for type date: "99 08 Jan"
LINE 1: SELECT date '99 08 Jan';
^
SELECT date '1999 08 Jan';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '99-01-08';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "99-01-08"
LINE 1: SELECT date '99-01-08';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '1999-01-08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '08-01-99';
date
------------
1999-08-01
(1 row)
SELECT date '08-01-1999';
date
------------
1999-08-01
(1 row)
SELECT date '01-08-99';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '01-08-1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '99-08-01';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "99-08-01"
LINE 1: SELECT date '99-08-01';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '1999-08-01';
date
------------
1999-08-01
(1 row)
SELECT date '99 01 08';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "99 01 08"
LINE 1: SELECT date '99 01 08';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '1999 01 08';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '08 01 99';
date
------------
1999-08-01
(1 row)
SELECT date '08 01 1999';
date
------------
1999-08-01
(1 row)
SELECT date '01 08 99';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '01 08 1999';
date
------------
1999-01-08
(1 row)
SELECT date '99 08 01';
ERROR: date/time field value out of range: "99 08 01"
LINE 1: SELECT date '99 08 01';
^
HINT: Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.
SELECT date '1999 08 01';
date
------------
1999-08-01
(1 row)
-- Check upper and lower limits of date range
SELECT date '4714-11-24 BC';
date
---------------
4714-11-24 BC
(1 row)
SELECT date '4714-11-23 BC'; -- out of range
ERROR: date out of range: "4714-11-23 BC"
LINE 1: SELECT date '4714-11-23 BC';
^
SELECT date '5874897-12-31';
date
---------------
5874897-12-31
(1 row)
SELECT date '5874898-01-01'; -- out of range
ERROR: date out of range: "5874898-01-01"
LINE 1: SELECT date '5874898-01-01';
^
-- Test non-error-throwing API
SELECT pg_input_is_valid('now', 'date');
pg_input_is_valid
-------------------
t
(1 row)
SELECT pg_input_is_valid('garbage', 'date');
pg_input_is_valid
-------------------
f
(1 row)
SELECT pg_input_is_valid('6874898-01-01', 'date');
pg_input_is_valid
-------------------
f
(1 row)
SELECT * FROM pg_input_error_info('garbage', 'date');
message | detail | hint | sql_error_code
-----------------------------------------------+--------+------+----------------
invalid input syntax for type date: "garbage" | | | 22007
(1 row)
SELECT * FROM pg_input_error_info('6874898-01-01', 'date');
message | detail | hint | sql_error_code
------------------------------------+--------+------+----------------
date out of range: "6874898-01-01" | | | 22008
(1 row)
RESET datestyle;
--
-- Simple math
-- Leave most of it for the horology tests
--
SELECT f1 - date '2000-01-01' AS "Days From 2K" FROM DATE_TBL;
Days From 2K
--------------
-15607
-15542
-1403
-1402
-1401
-1400
-1037
-1036
-1035
91
92
93
13977
14343
14710
-1475115
(16 rows)
SELECT f1 - date 'epoch' AS "Days From Epoch" FROM DATE_TBL;
Days From Epoch
-----------------
-4650
-4585
9554
9555
9556
9557
9920
9921
9922
11048
11049
11050
24934
25300
25667
-1464158
(16 rows)
SELECT date 'yesterday' - date 'today' AS "One day";
One day
---------
-1
(1 row)
SELECT date 'today' - date 'tomorrow' AS "One day";
One day
---------
-1
(1 row)
SELECT date 'yesterday' - date 'tomorrow' AS "Two days";
Two days
----------
-2
(1 row)
SELECT date 'tomorrow' - date 'today' AS "One day";
One day
---------
1
(1 row)
SELECT date 'today' - date 'yesterday' AS "One day";
One day
---------
1
(1 row)
SELECT date 'tomorrow' - date 'yesterday' AS "Two days";
Two days
----------
2
(1 row)
--
-- test extract!
--
SELECT f1 as "date",
date_part('year', f1) AS year,
date_part('month', f1) AS month,
date_part('day', f1) AS day,
date_part('quarter', f1) AS quarter,
date_part('decade', f1) AS decade,
date_part('century', f1) AS century,
date_part('millennium', f1) AS millennium,
date_part('isoyear', f1) AS isoyear,
date_part('week', f1) AS week,
date_part('dow', f1) AS dow,
date_part('isodow', f1) AS isodow,
date_part('doy', f1) AS doy,
date_part('julian', f1) AS julian,
date_part('epoch', f1) AS epoch
FROM date_tbl;
date | year | month | day | quarter | decade | century | millennium | isoyear | week | dow | isodow | doy | julian | epoch
---------------+-------+-------+-----+---------+--------+---------+------------+---------+------+-----+--------+-----+---------+---------------
04-09-1957 | 1957 | 4 | 9 | 2 | 195 | 20 | 2 | 1957 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 99 | 2435938 | -401760000
06-13-1957 | 1957 | 6 | 13 | 2 | 195 | 20 | 2 | 1957 | 24 | 4 | 4 | 164 | 2436003 | -396144000
02-28-1996 | 1996 | 2 | 28 | 1 | 199 | 20 | 2 | 1996 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 59 | 2450142 | 825465600
02-29-1996 | 1996 | 2 | 29 | 1 | 199 | 20 | 2 | 1996 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 60 | 2450143 | 825552000
03-01-1996 | 1996 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 199 | 20 | 2 | 1996 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 61 | 2450144 | 825638400
03-02-1996 | 1996 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 199 | 20 | 2 | 1996 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 62 | 2450145 | 825724800
02-28-1997 | 1997 | 2 | 28 | 1 | 199 | 20 | 2 | 1997 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 59 | 2450508 | 857088000
03-01-1997 | 1997 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 199 | 20 | 2 | 1997 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 60 | 2450509 | 857174400
03-02-1997 | 1997 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 199 | 20 | 2 | 1997 | 9 | 0 | 7 | 61 | 2450510 | 857260800
04-01-2000 | 2000 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 200 | 20 | 2 | 2000 | 13 | 6 | 6 | 92 | 2451636 | 954547200
04-02-2000 | 2000 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 200 | 20 | 2 | 2000 | 13 | 0 | 7 | 93 | 2451637 | 954633600
04-03-2000 | 2000 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 200 | 20 | 2 | 2000 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 94 | 2451638 | 954720000
04-08-2038 | 2038 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 203 | 21 | 3 | 2038 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 98 | 2465522 | 2154297600
04-09-2039 | 2039 | 4 | 9 | 2 | 203 | 21 | 3 | 2039 | 14 | 6 | 6 | 99 | 2465888 | 2185920000
04-10-2040 | 2040 | 4 | 10 | 2 | 204 | 21 | 3 | 2040 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 101 | 2466255 | 2217628800
04-10-2040 BC | -2040 | 4 | 10 | 2 | -204 | -21 | -3 | -2040 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 976430 | -126503251200
(16 rows)
--
-- epoch
--
SELECT EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM DATE '1970-01-01'); -- 0
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
0
(1 row)
--
-- century
--
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '0101-12-31 BC'); -- -2
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
-2
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '0100-12-31 BC'); -- -1
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
-1
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '0001-12-31 BC'); -- -1
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
-1
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '0001-01-01'); -- 1
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
1
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '0001-01-01 AD'); -- 1
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
1
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '1900-12-31'); -- 19
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
19
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '1901-01-01'); -- 20
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
20
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '2000-12-31'); -- 20
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
20
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '2001-01-01'); -- 21
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
21
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM CURRENT_DATE)>=21 AS True; -- true
true
------
t
(1 row)
--
-- millennium
--
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLENNIUM FROM DATE '0001-12-31 BC'); -- -1
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
-1
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLENNIUM FROM DATE '0001-01-01 AD'); -- 1
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
1
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLENNIUM FROM DATE '1000-12-31'); -- 1
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
1
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLENNIUM FROM DATE '1001-01-01'); -- 2
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
2
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLENNIUM FROM DATE '2000-12-31'); -- 2
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
2
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLENNIUM FROM DATE '2001-01-01'); -- 3
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
3
(1 row)
-- next test to be fixed on the turn of the next millennium;-)
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLENNIUM FROM CURRENT_DATE); -- 3
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
3
(1 row)
> After all that about numbering centuries and millenia correctly, > why does CVS tip still give me > > regression=# select extract(century from now()); > date_part > ----------- > 20 > (1 row) > [ ... looks in code ... ] > > Apparently it's because you fixed only timestamp_part, and not > timestamptz_part. I'm not too sure about what timestamp_trunc or > timestamptz_trunc should do, but they may be wrong as well. Sigh... as usual, what is not tested does not work:-( > Could we have a more complete patch? Please find a submission attached. I hope it really fixes all decade, century and millenium issues for extract and *_trunc functions on interval and other timestamp types. If someone could check that the results are reasonnable, it would be great. I indeed overlooked the fact that there were two functions. The patch fixes the code so that both variants agree. I added comments to interval extractions, because it relies on the C division to have a negative remainder: -7/10 = 0 and remains -7. As for *_trunc functions, I have chosen to put the first year of the century or millennium: -100, 1, 101... 1001 2001 etc. Indeed, I don't think it would make sense to put 2000 (last year of the 2nd millennium) for rounding all years of the third millenium. I also fixed the code so that all decades last 10 years and decade 199 means the 1990's. I have added some tests that are relevant to deal with tricky cases. The formula may be simplified, but all these cases must pass. Please keep them. Fabien Coelho
2004-08-20 05:45:14 +02:00
--
-- decade
--
SELECT EXTRACT(DECADE FROM DATE '1994-12-25'); -- 199
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
199
> After all that about numbering centuries and millenia correctly, > why does CVS tip still give me > > regression=# select extract(century from now()); > date_part > ----------- > 20 > (1 row) > [ ... looks in code ... ] > > Apparently it's because you fixed only timestamp_part, and not > timestamptz_part. I'm not too sure about what timestamp_trunc or > timestamptz_trunc should do, but they may be wrong as well. Sigh... as usual, what is not tested does not work:-( > Could we have a more complete patch? Please find a submission attached. I hope it really fixes all decade, century and millenium issues for extract and *_trunc functions on interval and other timestamp types. If someone could check that the results are reasonnable, it would be great. I indeed overlooked the fact that there were two functions. The patch fixes the code so that both variants agree. I added comments to interval extractions, because it relies on the C division to have a negative remainder: -7/10 = 0 and remains -7. As for *_trunc functions, I have chosen to put the first year of the century or millennium: -100, 1, 101... 1001 2001 etc. Indeed, I don't think it would make sense to put 2000 (last year of the 2nd millennium) for rounding all years of the third millenium. I also fixed the code so that all decades last 10 years and decade 199 means the 1990's. I have added some tests that are relevant to deal with tricky cases. The formula may be simplified, but all these cases must pass. Please keep them. Fabien Coelho
2004-08-20 05:45:14 +02:00
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(DECADE FROM DATE '0010-01-01'); -- 1
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
1
> After all that about numbering centuries and millenia correctly, > why does CVS tip still give me > > regression=# select extract(century from now()); > date_part > ----------- > 20 > (1 row) > [ ... looks in code ... ] > > Apparently it's because you fixed only timestamp_part, and not > timestamptz_part. I'm not too sure about what timestamp_trunc or > timestamptz_trunc should do, but they may be wrong as well. Sigh... as usual, what is not tested does not work:-( > Could we have a more complete patch? Please find a submission attached. I hope it really fixes all decade, century and millenium issues for extract and *_trunc functions on interval and other timestamp types. If someone could check that the results are reasonnable, it would be great. I indeed overlooked the fact that there were two functions. The patch fixes the code so that both variants agree. I added comments to interval extractions, because it relies on the C division to have a negative remainder: -7/10 = 0 and remains -7. As for *_trunc functions, I have chosen to put the first year of the century or millennium: -100, 1, 101... 1001 2001 etc. Indeed, I don't think it would make sense to put 2000 (last year of the 2nd millennium) for rounding all years of the third millenium. I also fixed the code so that all decades last 10 years and decade 199 means the 1990's. I have added some tests that are relevant to deal with tricky cases. The formula may be simplified, but all these cases must pass. Please keep them. Fabien Coelho
2004-08-20 05:45:14 +02:00
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(DECADE FROM DATE '0009-12-31'); -- 0
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
0
> After all that about numbering centuries and millenia correctly, > why does CVS tip still give me > > regression=# select extract(century from now()); > date_part > ----------- > 20 > (1 row) > [ ... looks in code ... ] > > Apparently it's because you fixed only timestamp_part, and not > timestamptz_part. I'm not too sure about what timestamp_trunc or > timestamptz_trunc should do, but they may be wrong as well. Sigh... as usual, what is not tested does not work:-( > Could we have a more complete patch? Please find a submission attached. I hope it really fixes all decade, century and millenium issues for extract and *_trunc functions on interval and other timestamp types. If someone could check that the results are reasonnable, it would be great. I indeed overlooked the fact that there were two functions. The patch fixes the code so that both variants agree. I added comments to interval extractions, because it relies on the C division to have a negative remainder: -7/10 = 0 and remains -7. As for *_trunc functions, I have chosen to put the first year of the century or millennium: -100, 1, 101... 1001 2001 etc. Indeed, I don't think it would make sense to put 2000 (last year of the 2nd millennium) for rounding all years of the third millenium. I also fixed the code so that all decades last 10 years and decade 199 means the 1990's. I have added some tests that are relevant to deal with tricky cases. The formula may be simplified, but all these cases must pass. Please keep them. Fabien Coelho
2004-08-20 05:45:14 +02:00
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(DECADE FROM DATE '0001-01-01 BC'); -- 0
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
0
> After all that about numbering centuries and millenia correctly, > why does CVS tip still give me > > regression=# select extract(century from now()); > date_part > ----------- > 20 > (1 row) > [ ... looks in code ... ] > > Apparently it's because you fixed only timestamp_part, and not > timestamptz_part. I'm not too sure about what timestamp_trunc or > timestamptz_trunc should do, but they may be wrong as well. Sigh... as usual, what is not tested does not work:-( > Could we have a more complete patch? Please find a submission attached. I hope it really fixes all decade, century and millenium issues for extract and *_trunc functions on interval and other timestamp types. If someone could check that the results are reasonnable, it would be great. I indeed overlooked the fact that there were two functions. The patch fixes the code so that both variants agree. I added comments to interval extractions, because it relies on the C division to have a negative remainder: -7/10 = 0 and remains -7. As for *_trunc functions, I have chosen to put the first year of the century or millennium: -100, 1, 101... 1001 2001 etc. Indeed, I don't think it would make sense to put 2000 (last year of the 2nd millennium) for rounding all years of the third millenium. I also fixed the code so that all decades last 10 years and decade 199 means the 1990's. I have added some tests that are relevant to deal with tricky cases. The formula may be simplified, but all these cases must pass. Please keep them. Fabien Coelho
2004-08-20 05:45:14 +02:00
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(DECADE FROM DATE '0002-12-31 BC'); -- -1
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
-1
> After all that about numbering centuries and millenia correctly, > why does CVS tip still give me > > regression=# select extract(century from now()); > date_part > ----------- > 20 > (1 row) > [ ... looks in code ... ] > > Apparently it's because you fixed only timestamp_part, and not > timestamptz_part. I'm not too sure about what timestamp_trunc or > timestamptz_trunc should do, but they may be wrong as well. Sigh... as usual, what is not tested does not work:-( > Could we have a more complete patch? Please find a submission attached. I hope it really fixes all decade, century and millenium issues for extract and *_trunc functions on interval and other timestamp types. If someone could check that the results are reasonnable, it would be great. I indeed overlooked the fact that there were two functions. The patch fixes the code so that both variants agree. I added comments to interval extractions, because it relies on the C division to have a negative remainder: -7/10 = 0 and remains -7. As for *_trunc functions, I have chosen to put the first year of the century or millennium: -100, 1, 101... 1001 2001 etc. Indeed, I don't think it would make sense to put 2000 (last year of the 2nd millennium) for rounding all years of the third millenium. I also fixed the code so that all decades last 10 years and decade 199 means the 1990's. I have added some tests that are relevant to deal with tricky cases. The formula may be simplified, but all these cases must pass. Please keep them. Fabien Coelho
2004-08-20 05:45:14 +02:00
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(DECADE FROM DATE '0011-01-01 BC'); -- -1
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
-1
> After all that about numbering centuries and millenia correctly, > why does CVS tip still give me > > regression=# select extract(century from now()); > date_part > ----------- > 20 > (1 row) > [ ... looks in code ... ] > > Apparently it's because you fixed only timestamp_part, and not > timestamptz_part. I'm not too sure about what timestamp_trunc or > timestamptz_trunc should do, but they may be wrong as well. Sigh... as usual, what is not tested does not work:-( > Could we have a more complete patch? Please find a submission attached. I hope it really fixes all decade, century and millenium issues for extract and *_trunc functions on interval and other timestamp types. If someone could check that the results are reasonnable, it would be great. I indeed overlooked the fact that there were two functions. The patch fixes the code so that both variants agree. I added comments to interval extractions, because it relies on the C division to have a negative remainder: -7/10 = 0 and remains -7. As for *_trunc functions, I have chosen to put the first year of the century or millennium: -100, 1, 101... 1001 2001 etc. Indeed, I don't think it would make sense to put 2000 (last year of the 2nd millennium) for rounding all years of the third millenium. I also fixed the code so that all decades last 10 years and decade 199 means the 1990's. I have added some tests that are relevant to deal with tricky cases. The formula may be simplified, but all these cases must pass. Please keep them. Fabien Coelho
2004-08-20 05:45:14 +02:00
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(DECADE FROM DATE '0012-12-31 BC'); -- -2
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
-2
> After all that about numbering centuries and millenia correctly, > why does CVS tip still give me > > regression=# select extract(century from now()); > date_part > ----------- > 20 > (1 row) > [ ... looks in code ... ] > > Apparently it's because you fixed only timestamp_part, and not > timestamptz_part. I'm not too sure about what timestamp_trunc or > timestamptz_trunc should do, but they may be wrong as well. Sigh... as usual, what is not tested does not work:-( > Could we have a more complete patch? Please find a submission attached. I hope it really fixes all decade, century and millenium issues for extract and *_trunc functions on interval and other timestamp types. If someone could check that the results are reasonnable, it would be great. I indeed overlooked the fact that there were two functions. The patch fixes the code so that both variants agree. I added comments to interval extractions, because it relies on the C division to have a negative remainder: -7/10 = 0 and remains -7. As for *_trunc functions, I have chosen to put the first year of the century or millennium: -100, 1, 101... 1001 2001 etc. Indeed, I don't think it would make sense to put 2000 (last year of the 2nd millennium) for rounding all years of the third millenium. I also fixed the code so that all decades last 10 years and decade 199 means the 1990's. I have added some tests that are relevant to deal with tricky cases. The formula may be simplified, but all these cases must pass. Please keep them. Fabien Coelho
2004-08-20 05:45:14 +02:00
(1 row)
--
-- all possible fields
--
SELECT EXTRACT(MICROSECONDS FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
ERROR: unit "microseconds" not supported for type date
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLISECONDS FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
ERROR: unit "milliseconds" not supported for type date
SELECT EXTRACT(SECOND FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
ERROR: unit "second" not supported for type date
SELECT EXTRACT(MINUTE FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
ERROR: unit "minute" not supported for type date
SELECT EXTRACT(HOUR FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
ERROR: unit "hour" not supported for type date
SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
11
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(MONTH FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
8
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(YEAR FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
2020
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(YEAR FROM DATE '2020-08-11 BC');
extract
---------
-2020
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(DECADE FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
202
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
21
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLENNIUM FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
3
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(ISOYEAR FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
2020
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(ISOYEAR FROM DATE '2020-08-11 BC');
extract
---------
-2020
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(QUARTER FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
3
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(WEEK FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
33
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(DOW FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
2
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(DOW FROM DATE '2020-08-16');
extract
---------
0
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(ISODOW FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
2
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(ISODOW FROM DATE '2020-08-16');
extract
---------
7
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(DOY FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
224
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(TIMEZONE FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
ERROR: unit "timezone" not supported for type date
SELECT EXTRACT(TIMEZONE_M FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
ERROR: unit "timezone_m" not supported for type date
SELECT EXTRACT(TIMEZONE_H FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
ERROR: unit "timezone_h" not supported for type date
SELECT EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
------------
1597104000
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(JULIAN FROM DATE '2020-08-11');
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
2459073
(1 row)
> After all that about numbering centuries and millenia correctly, > why does CVS tip still give me > > regression=# select extract(century from now()); > date_part > ----------- > 20 > (1 row) > [ ... looks in code ... ] > > Apparently it's because you fixed only timestamp_part, and not > timestamptz_part. I'm not too sure about what timestamp_trunc or > timestamptz_trunc should do, but they may be wrong as well. Sigh... as usual, what is not tested does not work:-( > Could we have a more complete patch? Please find a submission attached. I hope it really fixes all decade, century and millenium issues for extract and *_trunc functions on interval and other timestamp types. If someone could check that the results are reasonnable, it would be great. I indeed overlooked the fact that there were two functions. The patch fixes the code so that both variants agree. I added comments to interval extractions, because it relies on the C division to have a negative remainder: -7/10 = 0 and remains -7. As for *_trunc functions, I have chosen to put the first year of the century or millennium: -100, 1, 101... 1001 2001 etc. Indeed, I don't think it would make sense to put 2000 (last year of the 2nd millennium) for rounding all years of the third millenium. I also fixed the code so that all decades last 10 years and decade 199 means the 1990's. I have added some tests that are relevant to deal with tricky cases. The formula may be simplified, but all these cases must pass. Please keep them. Fabien Coelho
2004-08-20 05:45:14 +02:00
--
-- test trunc function!
--
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('MILLENNIUM', TIMESTAMP '1970-03-20 04:30:00.00000'); -- 1001
date_trunc
--------------------------
Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1001
(1 row)
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('MILLENNIUM', DATE '1970-03-20'); -- 1001-01-01
date_trunc
------------------------------
Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1001 PST
(1 row)
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('CENTURY', TIMESTAMP '1970-03-20 04:30:00.00000'); -- 1901
date_trunc
--------------------------
Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 1901
(1 row)
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('CENTURY', DATE '1970-03-20'); -- 1901
date_trunc
------------------------------
Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 1901 PST
(1 row)
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('CENTURY', DATE '2004-08-10'); -- 2001-01-01
date_trunc
------------------------------
Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 2001 PST
(1 row)
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('CENTURY', DATE '0002-02-04'); -- 0001-01-01
date_trunc
------------------------------
Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 0001 PST
(1 row)
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('CENTURY', DATE '0055-08-10 BC'); -- 0100-01-01 BC
date_trunc
---------------------------------
Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 0100 PST BC
(1 row)
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('DECADE', DATE '1993-12-25'); -- 1990-01-01
date_trunc
------------------------------
Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 1990 PST
(1 row)
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('DECADE', DATE '0004-12-25'); -- 0001-01-01 BC
date_trunc
---------------------------------
Sat Jan 01 00:00:00 0001 PST BC
(1 row)
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('DECADE', DATE '0002-12-31 BC'); -- 0011-01-01 BC
date_trunc
---------------------------------
Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 0011 PST BC
(1 row)
--
-- test infinity
--
select 'infinity'::date, '-infinity'::date;
date | date
----------+-----------
infinity | -infinity
(1 row)
select 'infinity'::date > 'today'::date as t;
t
---
t
(1 row)
select '-infinity'::date < 'today'::date as t;
t
---
t
(1 row)
select isfinite('infinity'::date), isfinite('-infinity'::date), isfinite('today'::date);
isfinite | isfinite | isfinite
----------+----------+----------
f | f | t
(1 row)
select 'infinity'::date = '+infinity'::date as t;
t
---
t
(1 row)
--
-- oscillating fields from non-finite date:
--
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- NULL
extract
---------
(1 row)
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM DATE '-infinity'); -- NULL
extract
---------
(1 row)
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
-- all supported fields
SELECT EXTRACT(DAY FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- NULL
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(MONTH FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- NULL
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(QUARTER FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- NULL
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(WEEK FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- NULL
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(DOW FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- NULL
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(ISODOW FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- NULL
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(DOY FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- NULL
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
---------
(1 row)
--
-- monotonic fields from non-finite date:
--
SELECT EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- Infinity
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
----------
Infinity
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM DATE '-infinity'); -- -Infinity
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
-----------
-Infinity
(1 row)
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
-- all supported fields
SELECT EXTRACT(YEAR FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- Infinity
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
----------
Infinity
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(DECADE FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- Infinity
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
----------
Infinity
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(CENTURY FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- Infinity
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
----------
Infinity
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(MILLENNIUM FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- Infinity
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
----------
Infinity
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(JULIAN FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- Infinity
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
----------
Infinity
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(ISOYEAR FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- Infinity
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
----------
Infinity
(1 row)
SELECT EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- Infinity
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
extract
----------
Infinity
(1 row)
--
-- wrong fields from non-finite date:
--
Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
2021-04-06 07:17:13 +02:00
SELECT EXTRACT(MICROSEC FROM DATE 'infinity'); -- error
ERROR: unit "microsec" not recognized for type date
-- test constructors
select make_date(2013, 7, 15);
make_date
------------
07-15-2013
(1 row)
select make_date(-44, 3, 15);
make_date
---------------
03-15-0044 BC
(1 row)
select make_time(8, 20, 0.0);
make_time
-----------
08:20:00
(1 row)
-- should fail
select make_date(0, 7, 15);
ERROR: date field value out of range: 0-07-15
select make_date(2013, 2, 30);
ERROR: date field value out of range: 2013-02-30
select make_date(2013, 13, 1);
ERROR: date field value out of range: 2013-13-01
select make_date(2013, 11, -1);
ERROR: date field value out of range: 2013-11--1
select make_time(10, 55, 100.1);
ERROR: time field value out of range: 10:55:100.1
select make_time(24, 0, 2.1);
ERROR: time field value out of range: 24:00:2.1