2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* win32_sema.c
|
|
|
|
* Microsoft Windows Win32 Semaphores Emulation
|
|
|
|
*
|
2016-01-02 19:33:40 +01:00
|
|
|
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2016, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* IDENTIFICATION
|
2010-09-20 22:08:53 +02:00
|
|
|
* src/backend/port/win32_sema.c
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "postgres.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "miscadmin.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "storage/ipc.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "storage/pg_sema.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static HANDLE *mySemSet; /* IDs of sema sets acquired so far */
|
|
|
|
static int numSems; /* number of sema sets acquired so far */
|
|
|
|
static int maxSems; /* allocated size of mySemaSet array */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void ReleaseSemaphores(int code, Datum arg);
|
|
|
|
|
Make the different Unix-y semaphore implementations ABI-compatible.
Previously, the "sem" field of PGPROC varied in size depending on which
kernel semaphore API we were using. That was okay as long as there was
only one likely choice per platform, but in the wake of commit ecb0d20a9,
that assumption seems rather shaky. It doesn't seem out of the question
anymore that an extension compiled against one API choice might be loaded
into a postmaster built with another choice. Moreover, this prevents any
possibility of selecting the semaphore API at postmaster startup, which
might be something we want to do in future.
Hence, change PGPROC.sem to be PGSemaphore (i.e. a pointer) for all Unix
semaphore APIs, and turn the pointed-to data into an opaque struct whose
contents are only known within the responsible modules.
For the SysV and unnamed-POSIX APIs, the pointed-to data has to be
allocated elsewhere in shared memory, which takes a little bit of
rejiggering of the InitShmemAllocation code sequence. (I invented a
ShmemAllocUnlocked() function to make that a little cleaner than it used
to be. That function is not meant for any uses other than the ones it
has now, but it beats having InitShmemAllocation() know explicitly about
allocation of space for semaphores and spinlocks.) This change means an
extra indirection to access the semaphore data, but since we only touch
that when blocking or awakening a process, there shouldn't be any
meaningful performance penalty. Moreover, at least for the unnamed-POSIX
case on Linux, the sem_t type is quite a bit wider than a pointer, so this
reduces sizeof(PGPROC) which seems like a good thing.
For the named-POSIX API, there's effectively no change: the PGPROC.sem
field was and still is a pointer to something returned by sem_open() in
the postmaster's memory space. Document and check the pre-existing
limitation that this case can't work in EXEC_BACKEND mode.
It did not seem worth unifying the Windows semaphore ABI with the Unix
cases, since there's no likelihood of needing ABI compatibility much less
runtime switching across those cases. However, we can simplify the Windows
code a bit if we define PGSemaphore as being directly a HANDLE, rather than
pointer to HANDLE, so let's do that while we're here. (This also ends up
being no change in what's physically stored in PGPROC.sem. We're just
moving the HANDLE fetch from callees to callers.)
It would take a bunch of additional code shuffling to get to the point of
actually choosing a semaphore API at postmaster start, but the effects
of that would now be localized in the port/XXX_sema.c files, so it seems
like fit material for a separate patch. The need for it is unproven as
yet, anyhow, whereas the ABI risk to extensions seems real enough.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4029.1481413370@sss.pgh.pa.us
2016-12-12 19:32:10 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Report amount of shared memory needed for semaphores
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
Size
|
|
|
|
PGSemaphoreShmemSize(int maxSemas)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* No shared memory needed on Windows */
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* PGReserveSemaphores --- initialize semaphore support
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* In the Win32 implementation, we acquire semaphores on-demand; the
|
|
|
|
* maxSemas parameter is just used to size the array that keeps track of
|
|
|
|
* acquired semas for subsequent releasing. We use anonymous semaphores
|
|
|
|
* so the semaphores are automatically freed when the last referencing
|
|
|
|
* process exits.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2006-10-04 02:30:14 +02:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
PGReserveSemaphores(int maxSemas, int port)
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2006-10-04 02:30:14 +02:00
|
|
|
mySemSet = (HANDLE *) malloc(maxSemas * sizeof(HANDLE));
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
if (mySemSet == NULL)
|
|
|
|
elog(PANIC, "out of memory");
|
|
|
|
numSems = 0;
|
|
|
|
maxSems = maxSemas;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on_shmem_exit(ReleaseSemaphores, 0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Release semaphores at shutdown or shmem reinitialization
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* (called as an on_shmem_exit callback, hence funny argument list)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
ReleaseSemaphores(int code, Datum arg)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < numSems; i++)
|
|
|
|
CloseHandle(mySemSet[i]);
|
|
|
|
free(mySemSet);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* PGSemaphoreCreate
|
|
|
|
*
|
Make the different Unix-y semaphore implementations ABI-compatible.
Previously, the "sem" field of PGPROC varied in size depending on which
kernel semaphore API we were using. That was okay as long as there was
only one likely choice per platform, but in the wake of commit ecb0d20a9,
that assumption seems rather shaky. It doesn't seem out of the question
anymore that an extension compiled against one API choice might be loaded
into a postmaster built with another choice. Moreover, this prevents any
possibility of selecting the semaphore API at postmaster startup, which
might be something we want to do in future.
Hence, change PGPROC.sem to be PGSemaphore (i.e. a pointer) for all Unix
semaphore APIs, and turn the pointed-to data into an opaque struct whose
contents are only known within the responsible modules.
For the SysV and unnamed-POSIX APIs, the pointed-to data has to be
allocated elsewhere in shared memory, which takes a little bit of
rejiggering of the InitShmemAllocation code sequence. (I invented a
ShmemAllocUnlocked() function to make that a little cleaner than it used
to be. That function is not meant for any uses other than the ones it
has now, but it beats having InitShmemAllocation() know explicitly about
allocation of space for semaphores and spinlocks.) This change means an
extra indirection to access the semaphore data, but since we only touch
that when blocking or awakening a process, there shouldn't be any
meaningful performance penalty. Moreover, at least for the unnamed-POSIX
case on Linux, the sem_t type is quite a bit wider than a pointer, so this
reduces sizeof(PGPROC) which seems like a good thing.
For the named-POSIX API, there's effectively no change: the PGPROC.sem
field was and still is a pointer to something returned by sem_open() in
the postmaster's memory space. Document and check the pre-existing
limitation that this case can't work in EXEC_BACKEND mode.
It did not seem worth unifying the Windows semaphore ABI with the Unix
cases, since there's no likelihood of needing ABI compatibility much less
runtime switching across those cases. However, we can simplify the Windows
code a bit if we define PGSemaphore as being directly a HANDLE, rather than
pointer to HANDLE, so let's do that while we're here. (This also ends up
being no change in what's physically stored in PGPROC.sem. We're just
moving the HANDLE fetch from callees to callers.)
It would take a bunch of additional code shuffling to get to the point of
actually choosing a semaphore API at postmaster start, but the effects
of that would now be localized in the port/XXX_sema.c files, so it seems
like fit material for a separate patch. The need for it is unproven as
yet, anyhow, whereas the ABI risk to extensions seems real enough.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4029.1481413370@sss.pgh.pa.us
2016-12-12 19:32:10 +01:00
|
|
|
* Allocate a PGSemaphore structure with initial count 1
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
*/
|
Make the different Unix-y semaphore implementations ABI-compatible.
Previously, the "sem" field of PGPROC varied in size depending on which
kernel semaphore API we were using. That was okay as long as there was
only one likely choice per platform, but in the wake of commit ecb0d20a9,
that assumption seems rather shaky. It doesn't seem out of the question
anymore that an extension compiled against one API choice might be loaded
into a postmaster built with another choice. Moreover, this prevents any
possibility of selecting the semaphore API at postmaster startup, which
might be something we want to do in future.
Hence, change PGPROC.sem to be PGSemaphore (i.e. a pointer) for all Unix
semaphore APIs, and turn the pointed-to data into an opaque struct whose
contents are only known within the responsible modules.
For the SysV and unnamed-POSIX APIs, the pointed-to data has to be
allocated elsewhere in shared memory, which takes a little bit of
rejiggering of the InitShmemAllocation code sequence. (I invented a
ShmemAllocUnlocked() function to make that a little cleaner than it used
to be. That function is not meant for any uses other than the ones it
has now, but it beats having InitShmemAllocation() know explicitly about
allocation of space for semaphores and spinlocks.) This change means an
extra indirection to access the semaphore data, but since we only touch
that when blocking or awakening a process, there shouldn't be any
meaningful performance penalty. Moreover, at least for the unnamed-POSIX
case on Linux, the sem_t type is quite a bit wider than a pointer, so this
reduces sizeof(PGPROC) which seems like a good thing.
For the named-POSIX API, there's effectively no change: the PGPROC.sem
field was and still is a pointer to something returned by sem_open() in
the postmaster's memory space. Document and check the pre-existing
limitation that this case can't work in EXEC_BACKEND mode.
It did not seem worth unifying the Windows semaphore ABI with the Unix
cases, since there's no likelihood of needing ABI compatibility much less
runtime switching across those cases. However, we can simplify the Windows
code a bit if we define PGSemaphore as being directly a HANDLE, rather than
pointer to HANDLE, so let's do that while we're here. (This also ends up
being no change in what's physically stored in PGPROC.sem. We're just
moving the HANDLE fetch from callees to callers.)
It would take a bunch of additional code shuffling to get to the point of
actually choosing a semaphore API at postmaster start, but the effects
of that would now be localized in the port/XXX_sema.c files, so it seems
like fit material for a separate patch. The need for it is unproven as
yet, anyhow, whereas the ABI risk to extensions seems real enough.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4029.1481413370@sss.pgh.pa.us
2016-12-12 19:32:10 +01:00
|
|
|
PGSemaphore
|
|
|
|
PGSemaphoreCreate(void)
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
HANDLE cur_handle;
|
|
|
|
SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES sec_attrs;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Can't do this in a backend, because static state is postmaster's */
|
|
|
|
Assert(!IsUnderPostmaster);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (numSems >= maxSems)
|
|
|
|
elog(PANIC, "too many semaphores created");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZeroMemory(&sec_attrs, sizeof(sec_attrs));
|
|
|
|
sec_attrs.nLength = sizeof(sec_attrs);
|
|
|
|
sec_attrs.lpSecurityDescriptor = NULL;
|
|
|
|
sec_attrs.bInheritHandle = TRUE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* We don't need a named semaphore */
|
2007-04-24 14:25:18 +02:00
|
|
|
cur_handle = CreateSemaphore(&sec_attrs, 1, 32767, NULL);
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
if (cur_handle)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* Successfully done */
|
|
|
|
mySemSet[numSems++] = cur_handle;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
ereport(PANIC,
|
Make the different Unix-y semaphore implementations ABI-compatible.
Previously, the "sem" field of PGPROC varied in size depending on which
kernel semaphore API we were using. That was okay as long as there was
only one likely choice per platform, but in the wake of commit ecb0d20a9,
that assumption seems rather shaky. It doesn't seem out of the question
anymore that an extension compiled against one API choice might be loaded
into a postmaster built with another choice. Moreover, this prevents any
possibility of selecting the semaphore API at postmaster startup, which
might be something we want to do in future.
Hence, change PGPROC.sem to be PGSemaphore (i.e. a pointer) for all Unix
semaphore APIs, and turn the pointed-to data into an opaque struct whose
contents are only known within the responsible modules.
For the SysV and unnamed-POSIX APIs, the pointed-to data has to be
allocated elsewhere in shared memory, which takes a little bit of
rejiggering of the InitShmemAllocation code sequence. (I invented a
ShmemAllocUnlocked() function to make that a little cleaner than it used
to be. That function is not meant for any uses other than the ones it
has now, but it beats having InitShmemAllocation() know explicitly about
allocation of space for semaphores and spinlocks.) This change means an
extra indirection to access the semaphore data, but since we only touch
that when blocking or awakening a process, there shouldn't be any
meaningful performance penalty. Moreover, at least for the unnamed-POSIX
case on Linux, the sem_t type is quite a bit wider than a pointer, so this
reduces sizeof(PGPROC) which seems like a good thing.
For the named-POSIX API, there's effectively no change: the PGPROC.sem
field was and still is a pointer to something returned by sem_open() in
the postmaster's memory space. Document and check the pre-existing
limitation that this case can't work in EXEC_BACKEND mode.
It did not seem worth unifying the Windows semaphore ABI with the Unix
cases, since there's no likelihood of needing ABI compatibility much less
runtime switching across those cases. However, we can simplify the Windows
code a bit if we define PGSemaphore as being directly a HANDLE, rather than
pointer to HANDLE, so let's do that while we're here. (This also ends up
being no change in what's physically stored in PGPROC.sem. We're just
moving the HANDLE fetch from callees to callers.)
It would take a bunch of additional code shuffling to get to the point of
actually choosing a semaphore API at postmaster start, but the effects
of that would now be localized in the port/XXX_sema.c files, so it seems
like fit material for a separate patch. The need for it is unproven as
yet, anyhow, whereas the ABI risk to extensions seems real enough.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4029.1481413370@sss.pgh.pa.us
2016-12-12 19:32:10 +01:00
|
|
|
(errmsg("could not create semaphore: error code %lu",
|
|
|
|
GetLastError())));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (PGSemaphore) cur_handle;
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* PGSemaphoreReset
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Reset a previously-initialized PGSemaphore to have count 0
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2006-10-04 02:30:14 +02:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
PGSemaphoreReset(PGSemaphore sema)
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* There's no direct API for this in Win32, so we have to ratchet the
|
|
|
|
* semaphore down to 0 with repeated trylock's.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Make the different Unix-y semaphore implementations ABI-compatible.
Previously, the "sem" field of PGPROC varied in size depending on which
kernel semaphore API we were using. That was okay as long as there was
only one likely choice per platform, but in the wake of commit ecb0d20a9,
that assumption seems rather shaky. It doesn't seem out of the question
anymore that an extension compiled against one API choice might be loaded
into a postmaster built with another choice. Moreover, this prevents any
possibility of selecting the semaphore API at postmaster startup, which
might be something we want to do in future.
Hence, change PGPROC.sem to be PGSemaphore (i.e. a pointer) for all Unix
semaphore APIs, and turn the pointed-to data into an opaque struct whose
contents are only known within the responsible modules.
For the SysV and unnamed-POSIX APIs, the pointed-to data has to be
allocated elsewhere in shared memory, which takes a little bit of
rejiggering of the InitShmemAllocation code sequence. (I invented a
ShmemAllocUnlocked() function to make that a little cleaner than it used
to be. That function is not meant for any uses other than the ones it
has now, but it beats having InitShmemAllocation() know explicitly about
allocation of space for semaphores and spinlocks.) This change means an
extra indirection to access the semaphore data, but since we only touch
that when blocking or awakening a process, there shouldn't be any
meaningful performance penalty. Moreover, at least for the unnamed-POSIX
case on Linux, the sem_t type is quite a bit wider than a pointer, so this
reduces sizeof(PGPROC) which seems like a good thing.
For the named-POSIX API, there's effectively no change: the PGPROC.sem
field was and still is a pointer to something returned by sem_open() in
the postmaster's memory space. Document and check the pre-existing
limitation that this case can't work in EXEC_BACKEND mode.
It did not seem worth unifying the Windows semaphore ABI with the Unix
cases, since there's no likelihood of needing ABI compatibility much less
runtime switching across those cases. However, we can simplify the Windows
code a bit if we define PGSemaphore as being directly a HANDLE, rather than
pointer to HANDLE, so let's do that while we're here. (This also ends up
being no change in what's physically stored in PGPROC.sem. We're just
moving the HANDLE fetch from callees to callers.)
It would take a bunch of additional code shuffling to get to the point of
actually choosing a semaphore API at postmaster start, but the effects
of that would now be localized in the port/XXX_sema.c files, so it seems
like fit material for a separate patch. The need for it is unproven as
yet, anyhow, whereas the ABI risk to extensions seems real enough.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4029.1481413370@sss.pgh.pa.us
2016-12-12 19:32:10 +01:00
|
|
|
while (PGSemaphoreTryLock(sema))
|
|
|
|
/* loop */ ;
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* PGSemaphoreLock
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Lock a semaphore (decrement count), blocking if count would be < 0.
|
|
|
|
* Serve the interrupt if interruptOK is true.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2006-10-04 02:30:14 +02:00
|
|
|
void
|
2015-02-03 23:25:00 +01:00
|
|
|
PGSemaphoreLock(PGSemaphore sema)
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
HANDLE wh[2];
|
2014-07-26 00:51:48 +02:00
|
|
|
bool done = false;
|
|
|
|
|
2012-05-10 19:36:14 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Note: pgwin32_signal_event should be first to ensure that it will be
|
|
|
|
* reported when multiple events are set. We want to guarantee that
|
|
|
|
* pending signals are serviced.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
wh[0] = pgwin32_signal_event;
|
Make the different Unix-y semaphore implementations ABI-compatible.
Previously, the "sem" field of PGPROC varied in size depending on which
kernel semaphore API we were using. That was okay as long as there was
only one likely choice per platform, but in the wake of commit ecb0d20a9,
that assumption seems rather shaky. It doesn't seem out of the question
anymore that an extension compiled against one API choice might be loaded
into a postmaster built with another choice. Moreover, this prevents any
possibility of selecting the semaphore API at postmaster startup, which
might be something we want to do in future.
Hence, change PGPROC.sem to be PGSemaphore (i.e. a pointer) for all Unix
semaphore APIs, and turn the pointed-to data into an opaque struct whose
contents are only known within the responsible modules.
For the SysV and unnamed-POSIX APIs, the pointed-to data has to be
allocated elsewhere in shared memory, which takes a little bit of
rejiggering of the InitShmemAllocation code sequence. (I invented a
ShmemAllocUnlocked() function to make that a little cleaner than it used
to be. That function is not meant for any uses other than the ones it
has now, but it beats having InitShmemAllocation() know explicitly about
allocation of space for semaphores and spinlocks.) This change means an
extra indirection to access the semaphore data, but since we only touch
that when blocking or awakening a process, there shouldn't be any
meaningful performance penalty. Moreover, at least for the unnamed-POSIX
case on Linux, the sem_t type is quite a bit wider than a pointer, so this
reduces sizeof(PGPROC) which seems like a good thing.
For the named-POSIX API, there's effectively no change: the PGPROC.sem
field was and still is a pointer to something returned by sem_open() in
the postmaster's memory space. Document and check the pre-existing
limitation that this case can't work in EXEC_BACKEND mode.
It did not seem worth unifying the Windows semaphore ABI with the Unix
cases, since there's no likelihood of needing ABI compatibility much less
runtime switching across those cases. However, we can simplify the Windows
code a bit if we define PGSemaphore as being directly a HANDLE, rather than
pointer to HANDLE, so let's do that while we're here. (This also ends up
being no change in what's physically stored in PGPROC.sem. We're just
moving the HANDLE fetch from callees to callers.)
It would take a bunch of additional code shuffling to get to the point of
actually choosing a semaphore API at postmaster start, but the effects
of that would now be localized in the port/XXX_sema.c files, so it seems
like fit material for a separate patch. The need for it is unproven as
yet, anyhow, whereas the ABI risk to extensions seems real enough.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4029.1481413370@sss.pgh.pa.us
2016-12-12 19:32:10 +01:00
|
|
|
wh[1] = sema;
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2008-01-26 20:55:08 +01:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2009-06-11 16:49:15 +02:00
|
|
|
* As in other implementations of PGSemaphoreLock, we need to check for
|
|
|
|
* cancel/die interrupts each time through the loop. But here, there is
|
|
|
|
* no hidden magic about whether the syscall will internally service a
|
|
|
|
* signal --- we do that ourselves.
|
2008-01-26 20:55:08 +01:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2014-07-26 00:51:48 +02:00
|
|
|
while (!done)
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2014-07-26 00:51:48 +02:00
|
|
|
DWORD rc;
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-07-26 00:51:48 +02:00
|
|
|
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-07-26 00:51:48 +02:00
|
|
|
rc = WaitForMultipleObjectsEx(2, wh, FALSE, INFINITE, TRUE);
|
|
|
|
switch (rc)
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
2014-07-26 00:51:48 +02:00
|
|
|
case WAIT_OBJECT_0:
|
|
|
|
/* Signal event is set - we have a signal to deliver */
|
|
|
|
pgwin32_dispatch_queued_signals();
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case WAIT_OBJECT_0 + 1:
|
|
|
|
/* We got it! */
|
|
|
|
done = true;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case WAIT_IO_COMPLETION:
|
2015-05-24 03:35:49 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2014-07-26 00:51:48 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* The system interrupted the wait to execute an I/O
|
|
|
|
* completion routine or asynchronous procedure call in this
|
|
|
|
* thread. PostgreSQL does not provoke either of these, but
|
|
|
|
* atypical loaded DLLs or even other processes might do so.
|
|
|
|
* Now, resume waiting.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case WAIT_FAILED:
|
|
|
|
ereport(FATAL,
|
|
|
|
(errmsg("could not lock semaphore: error code %lu",
|
|
|
|
GetLastError())));
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
elog(FATAL, "unexpected return code from WaitForMultipleObjectsEx(): %lu", rc);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-07-26 00:51:48 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* PGSemaphoreUnlock
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Unlock a semaphore (increment count)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2006-10-04 02:30:14 +02:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
PGSemaphoreUnlock(PGSemaphore sema)
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
Make the different Unix-y semaphore implementations ABI-compatible.
Previously, the "sem" field of PGPROC varied in size depending on which
kernel semaphore API we were using. That was okay as long as there was
only one likely choice per platform, but in the wake of commit ecb0d20a9,
that assumption seems rather shaky. It doesn't seem out of the question
anymore that an extension compiled against one API choice might be loaded
into a postmaster built with another choice. Moreover, this prevents any
possibility of selecting the semaphore API at postmaster startup, which
might be something we want to do in future.
Hence, change PGPROC.sem to be PGSemaphore (i.e. a pointer) for all Unix
semaphore APIs, and turn the pointed-to data into an opaque struct whose
contents are only known within the responsible modules.
For the SysV and unnamed-POSIX APIs, the pointed-to data has to be
allocated elsewhere in shared memory, which takes a little bit of
rejiggering of the InitShmemAllocation code sequence. (I invented a
ShmemAllocUnlocked() function to make that a little cleaner than it used
to be. That function is not meant for any uses other than the ones it
has now, but it beats having InitShmemAllocation() know explicitly about
allocation of space for semaphores and spinlocks.) This change means an
extra indirection to access the semaphore data, but since we only touch
that when blocking or awakening a process, there shouldn't be any
meaningful performance penalty. Moreover, at least for the unnamed-POSIX
case on Linux, the sem_t type is quite a bit wider than a pointer, so this
reduces sizeof(PGPROC) which seems like a good thing.
For the named-POSIX API, there's effectively no change: the PGPROC.sem
field was and still is a pointer to something returned by sem_open() in
the postmaster's memory space. Document and check the pre-existing
limitation that this case can't work in EXEC_BACKEND mode.
It did not seem worth unifying the Windows semaphore ABI with the Unix
cases, since there's no likelihood of needing ABI compatibility much less
runtime switching across those cases. However, we can simplify the Windows
code a bit if we define PGSemaphore as being directly a HANDLE, rather than
pointer to HANDLE, so let's do that while we're here. (This also ends up
being no change in what's physically stored in PGPROC.sem. We're just
moving the HANDLE fetch from callees to callers.)
It would take a bunch of additional code shuffling to get to the point of
actually choosing a semaphore API at postmaster start, but the effects
of that would now be localized in the port/XXX_sema.c files, so it seems
like fit material for a separate patch. The need for it is unproven as
yet, anyhow, whereas the ABI risk to extensions seems real enough.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4029.1481413370@sss.pgh.pa.us
2016-12-12 19:32:10 +01:00
|
|
|
if (!ReleaseSemaphore(sema, 1, NULL))
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
ereport(FATAL,
|
Make the different Unix-y semaphore implementations ABI-compatible.
Previously, the "sem" field of PGPROC varied in size depending on which
kernel semaphore API we were using. That was okay as long as there was
only one likely choice per platform, but in the wake of commit ecb0d20a9,
that assumption seems rather shaky. It doesn't seem out of the question
anymore that an extension compiled against one API choice might be loaded
into a postmaster built with another choice. Moreover, this prevents any
possibility of selecting the semaphore API at postmaster startup, which
might be something we want to do in future.
Hence, change PGPROC.sem to be PGSemaphore (i.e. a pointer) for all Unix
semaphore APIs, and turn the pointed-to data into an opaque struct whose
contents are only known within the responsible modules.
For the SysV and unnamed-POSIX APIs, the pointed-to data has to be
allocated elsewhere in shared memory, which takes a little bit of
rejiggering of the InitShmemAllocation code sequence. (I invented a
ShmemAllocUnlocked() function to make that a little cleaner than it used
to be. That function is not meant for any uses other than the ones it
has now, but it beats having InitShmemAllocation() know explicitly about
allocation of space for semaphores and spinlocks.) This change means an
extra indirection to access the semaphore data, but since we only touch
that when blocking or awakening a process, there shouldn't be any
meaningful performance penalty. Moreover, at least for the unnamed-POSIX
case on Linux, the sem_t type is quite a bit wider than a pointer, so this
reduces sizeof(PGPROC) which seems like a good thing.
For the named-POSIX API, there's effectively no change: the PGPROC.sem
field was and still is a pointer to something returned by sem_open() in
the postmaster's memory space. Document and check the pre-existing
limitation that this case can't work in EXEC_BACKEND mode.
It did not seem worth unifying the Windows semaphore ABI with the Unix
cases, since there's no likelihood of needing ABI compatibility much less
runtime switching across those cases. However, we can simplify the Windows
code a bit if we define PGSemaphore as being directly a HANDLE, rather than
pointer to HANDLE, so let's do that while we're here. (This also ends up
being no change in what's physically stored in PGPROC.sem. We're just
moving the HANDLE fetch from callees to callers.)
It would take a bunch of additional code shuffling to get to the point of
actually choosing a semaphore API at postmaster start, but the effects
of that would now be localized in the port/XXX_sema.c files, so it seems
like fit material for a separate patch. The need for it is unproven as
yet, anyhow, whereas the ABI risk to extensions seems real enough.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4029.1481413370@sss.pgh.pa.us
2016-12-12 19:32:10 +01:00
|
|
|
(errmsg("could not unlock semaphore: error code %lu",
|
|
|
|
GetLastError())));
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* PGSemaphoreTryLock
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Lock a semaphore only if able to do so without blocking
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2006-10-04 02:30:14 +02:00
|
|
|
bool
|
|
|
|
PGSemaphoreTryLock(PGSemaphore sema)
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DWORD ret;
|
|
|
|
|
Make the different Unix-y semaphore implementations ABI-compatible.
Previously, the "sem" field of PGPROC varied in size depending on which
kernel semaphore API we were using. That was okay as long as there was
only one likely choice per platform, but in the wake of commit ecb0d20a9,
that assumption seems rather shaky. It doesn't seem out of the question
anymore that an extension compiled against one API choice might be loaded
into a postmaster built with another choice. Moreover, this prevents any
possibility of selecting the semaphore API at postmaster startup, which
might be something we want to do in future.
Hence, change PGPROC.sem to be PGSemaphore (i.e. a pointer) for all Unix
semaphore APIs, and turn the pointed-to data into an opaque struct whose
contents are only known within the responsible modules.
For the SysV and unnamed-POSIX APIs, the pointed-to data has to be
allocated elsewhere in shared memory, which takes a little bit of
rejiggering of the InitShmemAllocation code sequence. (I invented a
ShmemAllocUnlocked() function to make that a little cleaner than it used
to be. That function is not meant for any uses other than the ones it
has now, but it beats having InitShmemAllocation() know explicitly about
allocation of space for semaphores and spinlocks.) This change means an
extra indirection to access the semaphore data, but since we only touch
that when blocking or awakening a process, there shouldn't be any
meaningful performance penalty. Moreover, at least for the unnamed-POSIX
case on Linux, the sem_t type is quite a bit wider than a pointer, so this
reduces sizeof(PGPROC) which seems like a good thing.
For the named-POSIX API, there's effectively no change: the PGPROC.sem
field was and still is a pointer to something returned by sem_open() in
the postmaster's memory space. Document and check the pre-existing
limitation that this case can't work in EXEC_BACKEND mode.
It did not seem worth unifying the Windows semaphore ABI with the Unix
cases, since there's no likelihood of needing ABI compatibility much less
runtime switching across those cases. However, we can simplify the Windows
code a bit if we define PGSemaphore as being directly a HANDLE, rather than
pointer to HANDLE, so let's do that while we're here. (This also ends up
being no change in what's physically stored in PGPROC.sem. We're just
moving the HANDLE fetch from callees to callers.)
It would take a bunch of additional code shuffling to get to the point of
actually choosing a semaphore API at postmaster start, but the effects
of that would now be localized in the port/XXX_sema.c files, so it seems
like fit material for a separate patch. The need for it is unproven as
yet, anyhow, whereas the ABI risk to extensions seems real enough.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4029.1481413370@sss.pgh.pa.us
2016-12-12 19:32:10 +01:00
|
|
|
ret = WaitForSingleObject(sema, 0);
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (ret == WAIT_OBJECT_0)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* We got it! */
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
else if (ret == WAIT_TIMEOUT)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* Can't get it */
|
|
|
|
errno = EAGAIN;
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Otherwise we are in trouble */
|
|
|
|
ereport(FATAL,
|
Make the different Unix-y semaphore implementations ABI-compatible.
Previously, the "sem" field of PGPROC varied in size depending on which
kernel semaphore API we were using. That was okay as long as there was
only one likely choice per platform, but in the wake of commit ecb0d20a9,
that assumption seems rather shaky. It doesn't seem out of the question
anymore that an extension compiled against one API choice might be loaded
into a postmaster built with another choice. Moreover, this prevents any
possibility of selecting the semaphore API at postmaster startup, which
might be something we want to do in future.
Hence, change PGPROC.sem to be PGSemaphore (i.e. a pointer) for all Unix
semaphore APIs, and turn the pointed-to data into an opaque struct whose
contents are only known within the responsible modules.
For the SysV and unnamed-POSIX APIs, the pointed-to data has to be
allocated elsewhere in shared memory, which takes a little bit of
rejiggering of the InitShmemAllocation code sequence. (I invented a
ShmemAllocUnlocked() function to make that a little cleaner than it used
to be. That function is not meant for any uses other than the ones it
has now, but it beats having InitShmemAllocation() know explicitly about
allocation of space for semaphores and spinlocks.) This change means an
extra indirection to access the semaphore data, but since we only touch
that when blocking or awakening a process, there shouldn't be any
meaningful performance penalty. Moreover, at least for the unnamed-POSIX
case on Linux, the sem_t type is quite a bit wider than a pointer, so this
reduces sizeof(PGPROC) which seems like a good thing.
For the named-POSIX API, there's effectively no change: the PGPROC.sem
field was and still is a pointer to something returned by sem_open() in
the postmaster's memory space. Document and check the pre-existing
limitation that this case can't work in EXEC_BACKEND mode.
It did not seem worth unifying the Windows semaphore ABI with the Unix
cases, since there's no likelihood of needing ABI compatibility much less
runtime switching across those cases. However, we can simplify the Windows
code a bit if we define PGSemaphore as being directly a HANDLE, rather than
pointer to HANDLE, so let's do that while we're here. (This also ends up
being no change in what's physically stored in PGPROC.sem. We're just
moving the HANDLE fetch from callees to callers.)
It would take a bunch of additional code shuffling to get to the point of
actually choosing a semaphore API at postmaster start, but the effects
of that would now be localized in the port/XXX_sema.c files, so it seems
like fit material for a separate patch. The need for it is unproven as
yet, anyhow, whereas the ABI risk to extensions seems real enough.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4029.1481413370@sss.pgh.pa.us
2016-12-12 19:32:10 +01:00
|
|
|
(errmsg("could not try-lock semaphore: error code %lu",
|
|
|
|
GetLastError())));
|
2006-10-04 02:30:14 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2006-04-29 18:34:41 +02:00
|
|
|
/* keep compiler quiet */
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|