postgresql/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c

636 lines
19 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* restrictinfo.c
* RestrictInfo node manipulation routines.
*
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2006, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c,v 1.47 2006/04/07 17:05:39 tgl Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#include "postgres.h"
#include "optimizer/clauses.h"
#include "optimizer/cost.h"
#include "optimizer/paths.h"
#include "optimizer/predtest.h"
#include "optimizer/restrictinfo.h"
#include "optimizer/var.h"
static RestrictInfo *make_restrictinfo_internal(Expr *clause,
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
Expr *orclause,
bool is_pushed_down,
bool outerjoin_delayed,
Relids required_relids);
static Expr *make_sub_restrictinfos(Expr *clause,
bool is_pushed_down,
bool outerjoin_delayed,
Relids required_relids);
static RestrictInfo *join_clause_is_redundant(PlannerInfo *root,
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
RestrictInfo *rinfo,
List *reference_list,
bool isouterjoin);
/*
* make_restrictinfo
*
* Build a RestrictInfo node containing the given subexpression.
*
* The is_pushed_down and outerjoin_delayed flags must be supplied by the
* caller. required_relids can be NULL, in which case it defaults to the
* actual clause contents (i.e., clause_relids).
*
* We initialize fields that depend only on the given subexpression, leaving
* others that depend on context (or may never be needed at all) to be filled
* later.
*/
RestrictInfo *
make_restrictinfo(Expr *clause,
bool is_pushed_down,
bool outerjoin_delayed,
Relids required_relids)
{
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* If it's an OR clause, build a modified copy with RestrictInfos inserted
* above each subclause of the top-level AND/OR structure.
*/
if (or_clause((Node *) clause))
return (RestrictInfo *) make_sub_restrictinfos(clause,
is_pushed_down,
outerjoin_delayed,
required_relids);
/* Shouldn't be an AND clause, else AND/OR flattening messed up */
Assert(!and_clause((Node *) clause));
return make_restrictinfo_internal(clause, NULL,
is_pushed_down, outerjoin_delayed,
required_relids);
}
/*
* make_restrictinfo_from_bitmapqual
*
* Given the bitmapqual Path structure for a bitmap indexscan, generate
* RestrictInfo node(s) equivalent to the condition represented by the
* indexclauses of the Path structure.
*
* The result is a List (effectively, implicit-AND representation) of
* RestrictInfos.
*
* The caller must pass is_pushed_down, but we assume outerjoin_delayed
* is false (no such qual should ever get into a bitmapqual).
*
* If include_predicates is true, we add any partial index predicates to
* the explicit index quals. When this is not true, we return a condition
* that might be weaker than the actual scan represents.
*
* To do this through the normal make_restrictinfo() API, callers would have
* to strip off the RestrictInfo nodes present in the indexclauses lists, and
* then make_restrictinfo() would have to build new ones. It's better to have
* a specialized routine to allow sharing of RestrictInfos.
*
* The qual manipulations here are much the same as in create_bitmap_subplan;
* keep the two routines in sync!
*/
List *
make_restrictinfo_from_bitmapqual(Path *bitmapqual,
bool is_pushed_down,
bool include_predicates)
{
List *result;
ListCell *l;
if (IsA(bitmapqual, BitmapAndPath))
{
BitmapAndPath *apath = (BitmapAndPath *) bitmapqual;
/*
* There may well be redundant quals among the subplans, since a
* top-level WHERE qual might have gotten used to form several
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* different index quals. We don't try exceedingly hard to eliminate
* redundancies, but we do eliminate obvious duplicates by using
* list_concat_unique.
*/
result = NIL;
foreach(l, apath->bitmapquals)
{
List *sublist;
sublist = make_restrictinfo_from_bitmapqual((Path *) lfirst(l),
is_pushed_down,
include_predicates);
result = list_concat_unique(result, sublist);
}
}
else if (IsA(bitmapqual, BitmapOrPath))
{
BitmapOrPath *opath = (BitmapOrPath *) bitmapqual;
List *withris = NIL;
List *withoutris = NIL;
/*
* Here, we only detect qual-free subplans. A qual-free subplan would
* cause us to generate "... OR true ..." which we may as well reduce
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* to just "true". We do not try to eliminate redundant subclauses
* because (a) it's not as likely as in the AND case, and (b) we might
* well be working with hundreds or even thousands of OR conditions,
* perhaps from a long IN list. The performance of list_append_unique
* would be unacceptable.
*/
foreach(l, opath->bitmapquals)
{
List *sublist;
sublist = make_restrictinfo_from_bitmapqual((Path *) lfirst(l),
is_pushed_down,
include_predicates);
if (sublist == NIL)
{
/*
* If we find a qual-less subscan, it represents a constant
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* TRUE, and hence the OR result is also constant TRUE, so we
* can stop here.
*/
return NIL;
}
/*
* If the sublist contains multiple RestrictInfos, we create an
* AND subclause. If there's just one, we have to check if it's
* an OR clause, and if so flatten it to preserve AND/OR flatness
* of our output.
*
* We construct lists with and without sub-RestrictInfos, so
* as not to have to regenerate duplicate RestrictInfos below.
*/
if (list_length(sublist) > 1)
{
withris = lappend(withris, make_andclause(sublist));
sublist = get_actual_clauses(sublist);
withoutris = lappend(withoutris, make_andclause(sublist));
}
else
{
RestrictInfo *subri = (RestrictInfo *) linitial(sublist);
Assert(IsA(subri, RestrictInfo));
if (restriction_is_or_clause(subri))
{
BoolExpr *subor = (BoolExpr *) subri->orclause;
Assert(or_clause((Node *) subor));
withris = list_concat(withris,
list_copy(subor->args));
subor = (BoolExpr *) subri->clause;
Assert(or_clause((Node *) subor));
withoutris = list_concat(withoutris,
list_copy(subor->args));
}
else
{
withris = lappend(withris, subri);
withoutris = lappend(withoutris, subri->clause);
}
}
}
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* Avoid generating one-element ORs, which could happen due to
* redundancy elimination or ScalarArrayOpExpr quals.
*/
if (list_length(withris) <= 1)
result = withris;
else
{
/* Here's the magic part not available to outside callers */
result =
list_make1(make_restrictinfo_internal(make_orclause(withoutris),
make_orclause(withris),
is_pushed_down,
false,
NULL));
}
}
else if (IsA(bitmapqual, IndexPath))
{
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
IndexPath *ipath = (IndexPath *) bitmapqual;
result = list_copy(ipath->indexclauses);
if (include_predicates && ipath->indexinfo->indpred != NIL)
{
foreach(l, ipath->indexinfo->indpred)
{
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
Expr *pred = (Expr *) lfirst(l);
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* We know that the index predicate must have been implied by
* the query condition as a whole, but it may or may not be
* implied by the conditions that got pushed into the
* bitmapqual. Avoid generating redundant conditions.
*/
if (!predicate_implied_by(list_make1(pred), result))
result = lappend(result,
make_restrictinfo(pred,
is_pushed_down,
false,
NULL));
}
}
}
else
{
elog(ERROR, "unrecognized node type: %d", nodeTag(bitmapqual));
result = NIL; /* keep compiler quiet */
}
return result;
}
/*
* make_restrictinfo_internal
*
* Common code for the main entry points and the recursive cases.
*/
static RestrictInfo *
make_restrictinfo_internal(Expr *clause, Expr *orclause,
bool is_pushed_down, bool outerjoin_delayed,
Relids required_relids)
{
RestrictInfo *restrictinfo = makeNode(RestrictInfo);
restrictinfo->clause = clause;
restrictinfo->orclause = orclause;
restrictinfo->is_pushed_down = is_pushed_down;
restrictinfo->outerjoin_delayed = outerjoin_delayed;
restrictinfo->can_join = false; /* may get set below */
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* If it's a binary opclause, set up left/right relids info. In any case
* set up the total clause relids info.
*/
if (is_opclause(clause) && list_length(((OpExpr *) clause)->args) == 2)
{
restrictinfo->left_relids = pull_varnos(get_leftop(clause));
restrictinfo->right_relids = pull_varnos(get_rightop(clause));
restrictinfo->clause_relids = bms_union(restrictinfo->left_relids,
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
restrictinfo->right_relids);
/*
* Does it look like a normal join clause, i.e., a binary operator
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* relating expressions that come from distinct relations? If so we
* might be able to use it in a join algorithm. Note that this is a
* purely syntactic test that is made regardless of context.
*/
if (!bms_is_empty(restrictinfo->left_relids) &&
!bms_is_empty(restrictinfo->right_relids) &&
!bms_overlap(restrictinfo->left_relids,
restrictinfo->right_relids))
restrictinfo->can_join = true;
}
else
{
/* Not a binary opclause, so mark left/right relid sets as empty */
restrictinfo->left_relids = NULL;
restrictinfo->right_relids = NULL;
/* and get the total relid set the hard way */
restrictinfo->clause_relids = pull_varnos((Node *) clause);
}
/* required_relids defaults to clause_relids */
if (required_relids != NULL)
restrictinfo->required_relids = required_relids;
else
restrictinfo->required_relids = restrictinfo->clause_relids;
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* Fill in all the cacheable fields with "not yet set" markers. None of
* these will be computed until/unless needed. Note in particular that we
* don't mark a binary opclause as mergejoinable or hashjoinable here;
* that happens only if it appears in the right context (top level of a
* joinclause list).
*/
restrictinfo->eval_cost.startup = -1;
restrictinfo->this_selec = -1;
restrictinfo->mergejoinoperator = InvalidOid;
restrictinfo->left_sortop = InvalidOid;
restrictinfo->right_sortop = InvalidOid;
restrictinfo->left_pathkey = NIL;
restrictinfo->right_pathkey = NIL;
restrictinfo->left_mergescansel = -1;
restrictinfo->right_mergescansel = -1;
restrictinfo->hashjoinoperator = InvalidOid;
restrictinfo->left_bucketsize = -1;
restrictinfo->right_bucketsize = -1;
return restrictinfo;
}
/*
* Recursively insert sub-RestrictInfo nodes into a boolean expression.
*
* We put RestrictInfos above simple (non-AND/OR) clauses and above
* sub-OR clauses, but not above sub-AND clauses, because there's no need.
* This may seem odd but it is closely related to the fact that we use
* implicit-AND lists at top level of RestrictInfo lists. Only ORs and
* simple clauses are valid RestrictInfos.
*
* The given required_relids are attached to our top-level output,
* but any OR-clause constituents are allowed to default to just the
* contained rels.
*/
static Expr *
make_sub_restrictinfos(Expr *clause,
bool is_pushed_down, bool outerjoin_delayed,
Relids required_relids)
{
if (or_clause((Node *) clause))
{
List *orlist = NIL;
ListCell *temp;
foreach(temp, ((BoolExpr *) clause)->args)
orlist = lappend(orlist,
make_sub_restrictinfos(lfirst(temp),
is_pushed_down,
outerjoin_delayed,
NULL));
return (Expr *) make_restrictinfo_internal(clause,
make_orclause(orlist),
is_pushed_down,
outerjoin_delayed,
required_relids);
}
else if (and_clause((Node *) clause))
{
List *andlist = NIL;
ListCell *temp;
foreach(temp, ((BoolExpr *) clause)->args)
andlist = lappend(andlist,
make_sub_restrictinfos(lfirst(temp),
is_pushed_down,
outerjoin_delayed,
required_relids));
return make_andclause(andlist);
}
else
return (Expr *) make_restrictinfo_internal(clause,
NULL,
is_pushed_down,
outerjoin_delayed,
required_relids);
}
/*
* restriction_is_or_clause
*
* Returns t iff the restrictinfo node contains an 'or' clause.
*/
bool
restriction_is_or_clause(RestrictInfo *restrictinfo)
{
if (restrictinfo->orclause != NULL)
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return true;
else
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return false;
}
/*
* get_actual_clauses
*
* Returns a list containing the bare clauses from 'restrictinfo_list'.
*/
List *
get_actual_clauses(List *restrictinfo_list)
{
List *result = NIL;
ListCell *temp;
foreach(temp, restrictinfo_list)
{
RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(temp);
Assert(IsA(rinfo, RestrictInfo));
result = lappend(result, rinfo->clause);
}
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return result;
}
/*
* get_actual_join_clauses
*
* Extract clauses from 'restrictinfo_list', separating those that
* syntactically match the join level from those that were pushed down.
*/
void
get_actual_join_clauses(List *restrictinfo_list,
List **joinquals, List **otherquals)
{
ListCell *temp;
*joinquals = NIL;
*otherquals = NIL;
foreach(temp, restrictinfo_list)
{
RestrictInfo *clause = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(temp);
if (clause->is_pushed_down)
*otherquals = lappend(*otherquals, clause->clause);
else
*joinquals = lappend(*joinquals, clause->clause);
}
}
/*
* remove_redundant_join_clauses
*
* Given a list of RestrictInfo clauses that are to be applied in a join,
* remove any duplicate or redundant clauses.
*
* We must eliminate duplicates when forming the restrictlist for a joinrel,
* since we will see many of the same clauses arriving from both input
* relations. Also, if a clause is a mergejoinable clause, it's possible that
* it is redundant with previous clauses (see optimizer/README for
* discussion). We detect that case and omit the redundant clause from the
* result list.
*
* The result is a fresh List, but it points to the same member nodes
* as were in the input.
*/
List *
remove_redundant_join_clauses(PlannerInfo *root, List *restrictinfo_list,
bool isouterjoin)
{
List *result = NIL;
ListCell *item;
QualCost cost;
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* If there are any redundant clauses, we want to eliminate the ones that
* are more expensive in favor of the ones that are less so. Run
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
* cost_qual_eval() to ensure the eval_cost fields are set up.
*/
cost_qual_eval(&cost, restrictinfo_list);
/*
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
* We don't have enough knowledge yet to be able to estimate the number of
* times a clause might be evaluated, so it's hard to weight the startup
* and per-tuple costs appropriately. For now just weight 'em the same.
*/
#define CLAUSECOST(r) ((r)->eval_cost.startup + (r)->eval_cost.per_tuple)
foreach(item, restrictinfo_list)
{
RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(item);
RestrictInfo *prevrinfo;
/* is it redundant with any prior clause? */
prevrinfo = join_clause_is_redundant(root, rinfo, result, isouterjoin);
if (prevrinfo == NULL)
{
/* no, so add it to result list */
result = lappend(result, rinfo);
}
else if (CLAUSECOST(rinfo) < CLAUSECOST(prevrinfo))
{
/* keep this one, drop the previous one */
result = list_delete_ptr(result, prevrinfo);
result = lappend(result, rinfo);
}
/* else, drop this one */
}
return result;
}
/*
* select_nonredundant_join_clauses
*
* Given a list of RestrictInfo clauses that are to be applied in a join,
* select the ones that are not redundant with any clause in the
* reference_list.
*
* This is similar to remove_redundant_join_clauses, but we are looking for
* redundancies with a separate list of clauses (i.e., clauses that have
* already been applied below the join itself).
*
* Note that we assume the given restrictinfo_list has already been checked
* for local redundancies, so we don't check again.
*/
List *
select_nonredundant_join_clauses(PlannerInfo *root,
List *restrictinfo_list,
List *reference_list,
bool isouterjoin)
{
List *result = NIL;
ListCell *item;
foreach(item, restrictinfo_list)
{
RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(item);
/* drop it if redundant with any reference clause */
if (join_clause_is_redundant(root, rinfo, reference_list, isouterjoin) != NULL)
continue;
/* otherwise, add it to result list */
result = lappend(result, rinfo);
}
return result;
}
/*
* join_clause_is_redundant
* If rinfo is redundant with any clause in reference_list,
* return one such clause; otherwise return NULL.
*
* This is the guts of both remove_redundant_join_clauses and
* select_nonredundant_join_clauses. See the docs above for motivation.
*
* We can detect redundant mergejoinable clauses very cheaply by using their
* left and right pathkeys, which uniquely identify the sets of equijoined
* variables in question. All the members of a pathkey set that are in the
* left relation have already been forced to be equal; likewise for those in
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
* the right relation. So, we need to have only one clause that checks
* equality between any set member on the left and any member on the right;
* by transitivity, all the rest are then equal.
*
* However, clauses that are of the form "var expr = const expr" cannot be
* eliminated as redundant. This is because when there are const expressions
* in a pathkey set, generate_implied_equalities() suppresses "var = var"
* clauses in favor of "var = const" clauses. We cannot afford to drop any
* of the latter, even though they might seem redundant by the pathkey
* membership test.
*
* Weird special case: if we have two clauses that seem redundant
* except one is pushed down into an outer join and the other isn't,
* then they're not really redundant, because one constrains the
* joined rows after addition of null fill rows, and the other doesn't.
*/
static RestrictInfo *
join_clause_is_redundant(PlannerInfo *root,
RestrictInfo *rinfo,
List *reference_list,
bool isouterjoin)
{
ListCell *refitem;
/* always consider exact duplicates redundant */
foreach(refitem, reference_list)
{
RestrictInfo *refrinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(refitem);
if (equal(rinfo, refrinfo))
return refrinfo;
}
/* check for redundant merge clauses */
if (rinfo->mergejoinoperator != InvalidOid)
{
/* do the cheap test first: is it a "var = const" clause? */
if (bms_is_empty(rinfo->left_relids) ||
bms_is_empty(rinfo->right_relids))
return NULL; /* var = const, so not redundant */
cache_mergeclause_pathkeys(root, rinfo);
foreach(refitem, reference_list)
{
RestrictInfo *refrinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(refitem);
if (refrinfo->mergejoinoperator != InvalidOid)
{
cache_mergeclause_pathkeys(root, refrinfo);
if (rinfo->left_pathkey == refrinfo->left_pathkey &&
rinfo->right_pathkey == refrinfo->right_pathkey &&
(rinfo->is_pushed_down == refrinfo->is_pushed_down ||
!isouterjoin))
{
/* Yup, it's redundant */
return refrinfo;
}
}
}
}
/* otherwise, not redundant */
return NULL;
}