postgresql/contrib/xml2/xslt_proc.c

257 lines
5.9 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
2010-09-20 22:08:53 +02:00
* contrib/xml2/xslt_proc.c
*
* XSLT processing functions (requiring libxslt)
*
* John Gray, for Torchbox 2003-04-01
*/
#include "postgres.h"
#include "executor/spi.h"
#include "fmgr.h"
#include "funcapi.h"
#include "miscadmin.h"
#include "utils/builtins.h"
#include "utils/xml.h"
#ifdef USE_LIBXSLT
/* libxml includes */
#include <libxml/xpath.h>
#include <libxml/tree.h>
#include <libxml/xmlmemory.h>
/* libxslt includes */
#include <libxslt/xslt.h>
#include <libxslt/xsltInternals.h>
#include <libxslt/security.h>
#include <libxslt/transform.h>
#include <libxslt/xsltutils.h>
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
#endif /* USE_LIBXSLT */
#ifdef USE_LIBXSLT
/* declarations to come from xpath.c */
extern PgXmlErrorContext *pgxml_parser_init(PgXmlStrictness strictness);
/* local defs */
static const char **parse_params(text *paramstr);
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
#endif /* USE_LIBXSLT */
PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(xslt_process);
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
Datum
xslt_process(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
#ifdef USE_LIBXSLT
text *doct = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(0);
text *ssheet = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(1);
text *result;
text *paramstr;
const char **params;
PgXmlErrorContext *xmlerrcxt;
volatile xsltStylesheetPtr stylesheet = NULL;
volatile xmlDocPtr doctree = NULL;
volatile xmlDocPtr restree = NULL;
volatile xsltSecurityPrefsPtr xslt_sec_prefs = NULL;
volatile xsltTransformContextPtr xslt_ctxt = NULL;
volatile int resstat = -1;
xmlChar *resstr = NULL;
int reslen = 0;
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
if (fcinfo->nargs == 3)
{
paramstr = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(2);
params = parse_params(paramstr);
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
}
else
{
2005-10-15 04:49:52 +02:00
/* No parameters */
params = (const char **) palloc(sizeof(char *));
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
params[0] = NULL;
}
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
/* Setup parser */
xmlerrcxt = pgxml_parser_init(PG_XML_STRICTNESS_LEGACY);
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
PG_TRY();
{
xmlDocPtr ssdoc;
bool xslt_sec_prefs_error;
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
/* Parse document */
doctree = xmlParseMemory((char *) VARDATA_ANY(doct),
VARSIZE_ANY_EXHDR(doct));
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
if (doctree == NULL)
xml_ereport(xmlerrcxt, ERROR, ERRCODE_EXTERNAL_ROUTINE_EXCEPTION,
"error parsing XML document");
/* Same for stylesheet */
ssdoc = xmlParseMemory((char *) VARDATA_ANY(ssheet),
VARSIZE_ANY_EXHDR(ssheet));
if (ssdoc == NULL)
xml_ereport(xmlerrcxt, ERROR, ERRCODE_EXTERNAL_ROUTINE_EXCEPTION,
"error parsing stylesheet as XML document");
/* After this call we need not free ssdoc separately */
stylesheet = xsltParseStylesheetDoc(ssdoc);
if (stylesheet == NULL)
xml_ereport(xmlerrcxt, ERROR, ERRCODE_EXTERNAL_ROUTINE_EXCEPTION,
"failed to parse stylesheet");
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
xslt_ctxt = xsltNewTransformContext(stylesheet, doctree);
xslt_sec_prefs_error = false;
if ((xslt_sec_prefs = xsltNewSecurityPrefs()) == NULL)
xslt_sec_prefs_error = true;
if (xsltSetSecurityPrefs(xslt_sec_prefs, XSLT_SECPREF_READ_FILE,
xsltSecurityForbid) != 0)
xslt_sec_prefs_error = true;
if (xsltSetSecurityPrefs(xslt_sec_prefs, XSLT_SECPREF_WRITE_FILE,
xsltSecurityForbid) != 0)
xslt_sec_prefs_error = true;
if (xsltSetSecurityPrefs(xslt_sec_prefs, XSLT_SECPREF_CREATE_DIRECTORY,
xsltSecurityForbid) != 0)
xslt_sec_prefs_error = true;
if (xsltSetSecurityPrefs(xslt_sec_prefs, XSLT_SECPREF_READ_NETWORK,
xsltSecurityForbid) != 0)
xslt_sec_prefs_error = true;
if (xsltSetSecurityPrefs(xslt_sec_prefs, XSLT_SECPREF_WRITE_NETWORK,
xsltSecurityForbid) != 0)
xslt_sec_prefs_error = true;
if (xsltSetCtxtSecurityPrefs(xslt_sec_prefs, xslt_ctxt) != 0)
xslt_sec_prefs_error = true;
if (xslt_sec_prefs_error)
ereport(ERROR,
(errmsg("could not set libxslt security preferences")));
restree = xsltApplyStylesheetUser(stylesheet, doctree, params,
NULL, NULL, xslt_ctxt);
if (restree == NULL)
xml_ereport(xmlerrcxt, ERROR, ERRCODE_EXTERNAL_ROUTINE_EXCEPTION,
"failed to apply stylesheet");
resstat = xsltSaveResultToString(&resstr, &reslen, restree, stylesheet);
}
PG_CATCH();
{
if (restree != NULL)
xmlFreeDoc(restree);
if (xslt_ctxt != NULL)
xsltFreeTransformContext(xslt_ctxt);
if (xslt_sec_prefs != NULL)
xsltFreeSecurityPrefs(xslt_sec_prefs);
if (stylesheet != NULL)
xsltFreeStylesheet(stylesheet);
if (doctree != NULL)
xmlFreeDoc(doctree);
xsltCleanupGlobals();
pg_xml_done(xmlerrcxt, true);
PG_RE_THROW();
}
PG_END_TRY();
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
xmlFreeDoc(restree);
xsltFreeTransformContext(xslt_ctxt);
xsltFreeSecurityPrefs(xslt_sec_prefs);
xsltFreeStylesheet(stylesheet);
xmlFreeDoc(doctree);
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
xsltCleanupGlobals();
pg_xml_done(xmlerrcxt, false);
/* XXX this is pretty dubious, really ought to throw error instead */
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
if (resstat < 0)
PG_RETURN_NULL();
result = cstring_to_text_with_len((char *) resstr, reslen);
if (resstr)
xmlFree(resstr);
PG_RETURN_TEXT_P(result);
2010-07-06 21:19:02 +02:00
#else /* !USE_LIBXSLT */
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("xslt_process() is not available without libxslt")));
PG_RETURN_NULL();
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
#endif /* USE_LIBXSLT */
}
#ifdef USE_LIBXSLT
static const char **
parse_params(text *paramstr)
{
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
char *pos;
char *pstr;
char *nvsep = "=";
char *itsep = ",";
const char **params;
int max_params;
int nparams;
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
pstr = text_to_cstring(paramstr);
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
max_params = 20; /* must be even! */
params = (const char **) palloc((max_params + 1) * sizeof(char *));
nparams = 0;
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
pos = pstr;
while (*pos != '\0')
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
{
if (nparams >= max_params)
{
max_params *= 2;
params = (const char **) repalloc(params,
(max_params + 1) * sizeof(char *));
}
params[nparams++] = pos;
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
pos = strstr(pos, nvsep);
if (pos != NULL)
{
*pos = '\0';
pos++;
}
else
{
/* No equal sign, so ignore this "parameter" */
nparams--;
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
break;
}
/* since max_params is even, we still have nparams < max_params */
params[nparams++] = pos;
2004-08-29 07:07:03 +02:00
pos = strstr(pos, itsep);
if (pos != NULL)
{
*pos = '\0';
pos++;
}
else
break;
}
/* Add the terminator marker; we left room for it in the palloc's */
params[nparams] = NULL;
return params;
}
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
#endif /* USE_LIBXSLT */