postgresql/src/backend/utils/adt/geo_ops.c

5066 lines
109 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* geo_ops.c
* 2D geometric operations
*
2003-08-04 04:40:20 +02:00
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2003, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/geo_ops.c,v 1.81 2003/09/25 06:58:03 petere Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#include "postgres.h"
#include <math.h>
#include <limits.h>
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
#include <float.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include "libpq/pqformat.h"
#include "utils/builtins.h"
1997-03-15 00:21:12 +01:00
#include "utils/geo_decls.h"
#ifndef M_PI
#define M_PI 3.14159265358979323846
#endif
/*
* Internal routines
*/
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
static int point_inside(Point *p, int npts, Point *plist);
static int lseg_crossing(double x, double y, double px, double py);
static BOX *box_construct(double x1, double x2, double y1, double y2);
1997-09-08 22:59:27 +02:00
static BOX *box_copy(BOX *box);
static BOX *box_fill(BOX *result, double x1, double x2, double y1, double y2);
static bool box_ov(BOX *box1, BOX *box2);
1997-09-08 22:59:27 +02:00
static double box_ht(BOX *box);
static double box_wd(BOX *box);
static double circle_ar(CIRCLE *circle);
static CIRCLE *circle_copy(CIRCLE *circle);
static LINE *line_construct_pm(Point *pt, double m);
static void line_construct_pts(LINE *line, Point *pt1, Point *pt2);
static bool lseg_intersect_internal(LSEG *l1, LSEG *l2);
static double lseg_dt(LSEG *l1, LSEG *l2);
static bool on_ps_internal(Point *pt, LSEG *lseg);
static void make_bound_box(POLYGON *poly);
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
static bool plist_same(int npts, Point *p1, Point *p2);
static Point *point_construct(double x, double y);
static Point *point_copy(Point *pt);
static int single_decode(char *str, float8 *x, char **ss);
static int single_encode(float8 x, char *str);
static int pair_decode(char *str, float8 *x, float8 *y, char **s);
static int pair_encode(float8 x, float8 y, char *str);
static int pair_count(char *s, char delim);
static int path_decode(int opentype, int npts, char *str, int *isopen, char **ss, Point *p);
static char *path_encode(bool closed, int npts, Point *pt);
static void statlseg_construct(LSEG *lseg, Point *pt1, Point *pt2);
1997-09-08 22:59:27 +02:00
static double box_ar(BOX *box);
static void box_cn(Point *center, BOX *box);
static Point *interpt_sl(LSEG *lseg, LINE *line);
static bool has_interpt_sl(LSEG *lseg, LINE *line);
static double dist_pl_internal(Point *pt, LINE *line);
static double dist_ps_internal(Point *pt, LSEG *lseg);
static Point *line_interpt_internal(LINE *l1, LINE *l2);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/*
* Delimiters for input and output strings.
* LDELIM, RDELIM, and DELIM are left, right, and separator delimiters, respectively.
* LDELIM_EP, RDELIM_EP are left and right delimiters for paths with endpoints.
*/
#define LDELIM '('
#define RDELIM ')'
#define DELIM ','
#define LDELIM_EP '['
#define RDELIM_EP ']'
#define LDELIM_C '<'
#define RDELIM_C '>'
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/* Maximum number of characters printed by pair_encode() */
/* ...+2+7 : 2 accounts for extra_float_digits max value */
#define P_MAXLEN (2*(DBL_DIG+2+7)+1)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/*
* Geometric data types are composed of points.
* This code tries to support a common format throughout the data types,
* to allow for more predictable usage and data type conversion.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
* The fundamental unit is the point. Other units are line segments,
* open paths, boxes, closed paths, and polygons (which should be considered
* non-intersecting closed paths).
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*
* Data representation is as follows:
* point: (x,y)
* line segment: [(x1,y1),(x2,y2)]
* box: (x1,y1),(x2,y2)
* open path: [(x1,y1),...,(xn,yn)]
* closed path: ((x1,y1),...,(xn,yn))
* polygon: ((x1,y1),...,(xn,yn))
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*
* For boxes, the points are opposite corners with the first point at the top right.
* For closed paths and polygons, the points should be reordered to allow
* fast and correct equality comparisons.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*
* XXX perhaps points in complex shapes should be reordered internally
* to allow faster internal operations, but should keep track of input order
* and restore that order for text output - tgl 97/01/16
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
static int
single_decode(char *str, float8 *x, char **s)
{
char *cp;
if (!PointerIsValid(str))
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return FALSE;
while (isspace((unsigned char) *str))
str++;
*x = strtod(str, &cp);
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("single_decode- (%x) try decoding %s to %g\n", (cp - str), str, *x);
#endif
if (cp <= str)
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return FALSE;
while (isspace((unsigned char) *cp))
cp++;
if (s != NULL)
*s = cp;
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return TRUE;
} /* single_decode() */
static int
single_encode(float8 x, char *str)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
int ndig = DBL_DIG + extra_float_digits;
if (ndig < 1)
ndig = 1;
sprintf(str, "%.*g", ndig, x);
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return TRUE;
} /* single_encode() */
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
static int
pair_decode(char *str, float8 *x, float8 *y, char **s)
{
int has_delim;
char *cp;
if (!PointerIsValid(str))
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return FALSE;
while (isspace((unsigned char) *str))
str++;
if ((has_delim = (*str == LDELIM)))
str++;
while (isspace((unsigned char) *str))
str++;
*x = strtod(str, &cp);
if (cp <= str)
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return FALSE;
while (isspace((unsigned char) *cp))
cp++;
if (*cp++ != DELIM)
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return FALSE;
while (isspace((unsigned char) *cp))
cp++;
*y = strtod(cp, &str);
if (str <= cp)
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return FALSE;
while (isspace((unsigned char) *str))
str++;
if (has_delim)
{
if (*str != RDELIM)
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return FALSE;
str++;
while (isspace((unsigned char) *str))
str++;
}
if (s != NULL)
*s = str;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return TRUE;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
static int
pair_encode(float8 x, float8 y, char *str)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
int ndig = DBL_DIG + extra_float_digits;
if (ndig < 1)
ndig = 1;
sprintf(str, "%.*g,%.*g", ndig, x, ndig, y);
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return TRUE;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
static int
path_decode(int opentype, int npts, char *str, int *isopen, char **ss, Point *p)
{
int depth = 0;
char *s,
*cp;
int i;
s = str;
while (isspace((unsigned char) *s))
s++;
if ((*isopen = (*s == LDELIM_EP)))
{
/* no open delimiter allowed? */
if (!opentype)
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return FALSE;
depth++;
s++;
while (isspace((unsigned char) *s))
s++;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
1997-09-05 20:13:45 +02:00
}
else if (*s == LDELIM)
{
cp = (s + 1);
while (isspace((unsigned char) *cp))
cp++;
if (*cp == LDELIM)
{
#ifdef NOT_USED
/* nested delimiters with only one point? */
if (npts <= 1)
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return FALSE;
#endif
depth++;
s = cp;
}
else if (strrchr(s, LDELIM) == s)
{
depth++;
s = cp;
}
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
for (i = 0; i < npts; i++)
{
if (!pair_decode(s, &(p->x), &(p->y), &s))
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return FALSE;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
if (*s == DELIM)
s++;
p++;
1997-09-05 20:13:45 +02:00
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
while (depth > 0)
{
if ((*s == RDELIM)
|| ((*s == RDELIM_EP) && (*isopen) && (depth == 1)))
{
depth--;
s++;
while (isspace((unsigned char) *s))
s++;
}
else
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return FALSE;
}
*ss = s;
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return TRUE;
} /* path_decode() */
static char *
path_encode(bool closed, int npts, Point *pt)
{
int size = npts * (P_MAXLEN + 3) + 2;
char *result;
char *cp;
int i;
/* Check for integer overflow */
if ((size - 2) / npts != (P_MAXLEN + 3))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_PROGRAM_LIMIT_EXCEEDED),
errmsg("too many points requested")));
result = palloc(size);
cp = result;
switch (closed)
{
case TRUE:
*cp++ = LDELIM;
break;
case FALSE:
*cp++ = LDELIM_EP;
break;
default:
break;
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
for (i = 0; i < npts; i++)
{
*cp++ = LDELIM;
if (!pair_encode(pt->x, pt->y, cp))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
errmsg("could not format path")));
cp += strlen(cp);
*cp++ = RDELIM;
*cp++ = DELIM;
pt++;
}
cp--;
switch (closed)
{
case TRUE:
*cp++ = RDELIM;
break;
case FALSE:
*cp++ = RDELIM_EP;
break;
default:
break;
}
*cp = '\0';
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return result;
} /* path_encode() */
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/*-------------------------------------------------------------
* pair_count - count the number of points
* allow the following notation:
* '((1,2),(3,4))'
* '(1,3,2,4)'
* require an odd number of delim characters in the string
*-------------------------------------------------------------*/
static int
pair_count(char *s, char delim)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
int ndelim = 0;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
while ((s = strchr(s, delim)) != NULL)
{
ndelim++;
s++;
}
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return (ndelim % 2) ? ((ndelim + 1) / 2) : -1;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
/***********************************************************************
**
** Routines for two-dimensional boxes.
**
***********************************************************************/
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* Formatting and conversion routines.
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
/* box_in - convert a string to internal form.
*
* External format: (two corners of box)
* "(f8, f8), (f8, f8)"
* also supports the older style "(f8, f8, f8, f8)"
*/
Datum
box_in(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
char *str = PG_GETARG_CSTRING(0);
BOX *box = (BOX *) palloc(sizeof(BOX));
int isopen;
char *s;
double x,
y;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
if ((!path_decode(FALSE, 2, str, &isopen, &s, &(box->high)))
|| (*s != '\0'))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TEXT_REPRESENTATION),
errmsg("invalid input syntax for type box: \"%s\"", str)));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/* reorder corners if necessary... */
if (box->high.x < box->low.x)
{
x = box->high.x;
box->high.x = box->low.x;
box->low.x = x;
}
if (box->high.y < box->low.y)
{
y = box->high.y;
box->high.y = box->low.y;
box->low.y = y;
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_BOX_P(box);
}
/* box_out - convert a box to external form.
*/
Datum
box_out(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_CSTRING(path_encode(-1, 2, &(box->high)));
}
2003-05-13 20:03:08 +02:00
/*
* box_recv - converts external binary format to box
*/
Datum
box_recv(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
StringInfo buf = (StringInfo) PG_GETARG_POINTER(0);
BOX *box;
double x,
y;
box = (BOX *) palloc(sizeof(BOX));
box->high.x = pq_getmsgfloat8(buf);
box->high.y = pq_getmsgfloat8(buf);
box->low.x = pq_getmsgfloat8(buf);
box->low.y = pq_getmsgfloat8(buf);
/* reorder corners if necessary... */
if (box->high.x < box->low.x)
{
x = box->high.x;
box->high.x = box->low.x;
box->low.x = x;
}
if (box->high.y < box->low.y)
{
y = box->high.y;
box->high.y = box->low.y;
box->low.y = y;
}
PG_RETURN_BOX_P(box);
}
/*
* box_send - converts box to binary format
*/
Datum
box_send(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
StringInfoData buf;
pq_begintypsend(&buf);
pq_sendfloat8(&buf, box->high.x);
pq_sendfloat8(&buf, box->high.y);
pq_sendfloat8(&buf, box->low.x);
pq_sendfloat8(&buf, box->low.y);
PG_RETURN_BYTEA_P(pq_endtypsend(&buf));
}
/* box_construct - fill in a new box.
*/
static BOX *
box_construct(double x1, double x2, double y1, double y2)
{
BOX *result = (BOX *) palloc(sizeof(BOX));
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return box_fill(result, x1, x2, y1, y2);
}
/* box_fill - fill in a given box struct
*/
static BOX *
1997-09-08 22:59:27 +02:00
box_fill(BOX *result, double x1, double x2, double y1, double y2)
{
if (x1 > x2)
{
result->high.x = x1;
result->low.x = x2;
}
else
{
result->high.x = x2;
result->low.x = x1;
}
if (y1 > y2)
{
result->high.y = y1;
result->low.y = y2;
}
else
{
result->high.y = y2;
result->low.y = y1;
}
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return result;
}
/* box_copy - copy a box
*/
static BOX *
1997-09-08 22:59:27 +02:00
box_copy(BOX *box)
{
BOX *result = (BOX *) palloc(sizeof(BOX));
memcpy((char *) result, (char *) box, sizeof(BOX));
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return result;
}
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* Relational operators for BOXes.
* <, >, <=, >=, and == are based on box area.
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
/* box_same - are two boxes identical?
*/
Datum
box_same(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box1 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
BOX *box2 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(box1->high.x, box2->high.x) &&
FPeq(box1->low.x, box2->low.x) &&
FPeq(box1->high.y, box2->high.y) &&
FPeq(box1->low.y, box2->low.y));
}
/* box_overlap - does box1 overlap box2?
*/
Datum
box_overlap(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box1 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
BOX *box2 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(box_ov(box1, box2));
}
static bool
box_ov(BOX *box1, BOX *box2)
{
return ((FPge(box1->high.x, box2->high.x) &&
FPle(box1->low.x, box2->high.x)) ||
(FPge(box2->high.x, box1->high.x) &&
FPle(box2->low.x, box1->high.x)))
&&
((FPge(box1->high.y, box2->high.y) &&
FPle(box1->low.y, box2->high.y)) ||
(FPge(box2->high.y, box1->high.y) &&
FPle(box2->low.y, box1->high.y)));
}
/* box_overleft - is the right edge of box1 to the left of
* the right edge of box2?
*
* This is "less than or equal" for the end of a time range,
* when time ranges are stored as rectangles.
*/
Datum
box_overleft(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box1 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
BOX *box2 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPle(box1->high.x, box2->high.x));
}
/* box_left - is box1 strictly left of box2?
*/
Datum
box_left(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box1 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
BOX *box2 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPlt(box1->high.x, box2->low.x));
}
/* box_right - is box1 strictly right of box2?
*/
Datum
box_right(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box1 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
BOX *box2 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPgt(box1->low.x, box2->high.x));
}
/* box_overright - is the left edge of box1 to the right of
* the left edge of box2?
*
* This is "greater than or equal" for time ranges, when time ranges
* are stored as rectangles.
*/
Datum
box_overright(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box1 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
BOX *box2 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPge(box1->low.x, box2->low.x));
}
/* box_contained - is box1 contained by box2?
*/
Datum
box_contained(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box1 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
BOX *box2 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPle(box1->high.x, box2->high.x) &&
FPge(box1->low.x, box2->low.x) &&
FPle(box1->high.y, box2->high.y) &&
FPge(box1->low.y, box2->low.y));
}
/* box_contain - does box1 contain box2?
*/
Datum
box_contain(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box1 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
BOX *box2 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPge(box1->high.x, box2->high.x) &&
FPle(box1->low.x, box2->low.x) &&
FPge(box1->high.y, box2->high.y) &&
FPle(box1->low.y, box2->low.y));
}
/* box_positionop -
* is box1 entirely {above,below} box2?
*/
Datum
box_below(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box1 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
BOX *box2 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPle(box1->high.y, box2->low.y));
}
Datum
box_above(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box1 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
BOX *box2 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPge(box1->low.y, box2->high.y));
}
/* box_relop - is area(box1) relop area(box2), within
* our accuracy constraint?
*/
Datum
box_lt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box1 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
BOX *box2 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPlt(box_ar(box1), box_ar(box2)));
}
Datum
box_gt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box1 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
BOX *box2 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPgt(box_ar(box1), box_ar(box2)));
}
Datum
box_eq(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box1 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
BOX *box2 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(box_ar(box1), box_ar(box2)));
}
Datum
box_le(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box1 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
BOX *box2 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPle(box_ar(box1), box_ar(box2)));
}
Datum
box_ge(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box1 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
BOX *box2 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPge(box_ar(box1), box_ar(box2)));
}
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* "Arithmetic" operators on boxes.
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
/* box_area - returns the area of the box.
*/
Datum
box_area(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(box_ar(box));
}
/* box_width - returns the width of the box
* (horizontal magnitude).
*/
Datum
box_width(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(box->high.x - box->low.x);
}
/* box_height - returns the height of the box
* (vertical magnitude).
*/
Datum
box_height(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(box->high.y - box->low.y);
}
/* box_distance - returns the distance between the
* center points of two boxes.
*/
Datum
box_distance(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box1 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
BOX *box2 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
Point a,
b;
box_cn(&a, box1);
box_cn(&b, box2);
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(HYPOT(a.x - b.x, a.y - b.y));
}
/* box_center - returns the center point of the box.
*/
Datum
box_center(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
Point *result = (Point *) palloc(sizeof(Point));
box_cn(result, box);
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
/* box_ar - returns the area of the box.
*/
static double
1997-09-08 22:59:27 +02:00
box_ar(BOX *box)
{
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return box_wd(box) * box_ht(box);
}
/* box_cn - stores the centerpoint of the box into *center.
*/
static void
box_cn(Point *center, BOX *box)
{
center->x = (box->high.x + box->low.x) / 2.0;
center->y = (box->high.y + box->low.y) / 2.0;
}
/* box_wd - returns the width (length) of the box
* (horizontal magnitude).
*/
static double
1997-09-08 22:59:27 +02:00
box_wd(BOX *box)
{
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return box->high.x - box->low.x;
}
/* box_ht - returns the height of the box
* (vertical magnitude).
*/
static double
1997-09-08 22:59:27 +02:00
box_ht(BOX *box)
{
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return box->high.y - box->low.y;
}
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* Funky operations.
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
/* box_intersect -
* returns the overlapping portion of two boxes,
* or NULL if they do not intersect.
*/
Datum
box_intersect(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box1 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
BOX *box2 = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
BOX *result;
if (!box_ov(box1, box2))
PG_RETURN_NULL();
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result = (BOX *) palloc(sizeof(BOX));
result->high.x = Min(box1->high.x, box2->high.x);
result->low.x = Max(box1->low.x, box2->low.x);
result->high.y = Min(box1->high.y, box2->high.y);
result->low.y = Max(box1->low.y, box2->low.y);
PG_RETURN_BOX_P(result);
}
/* box_diagonal -
* returns a line segment which happens to be the
* positive-slope diagonal of "box".
*/
Datum
box_diagonal(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
LSEG *result = (LSEG *) palloc(sizeof(LSEG));
statlseg_construct(result, &box->high, &box->low);
PG_RETURN_LSEG_P(result);
}
/***********************************************************************
**
** Routines for 2D lines.
** Lines are not intended to be used as ADTs per se,
** but their ops are useful tools for other ADT ops. Thus,
** there are few relops.
**
***********************************************************************/
Datum
line_in(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
#ifdef ENABLE_LINE_TYPE
char *str = PG_GETARG_CSTRING(0);
#endif
LINE *line;
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
#ifdef ENABLE_LINE_TYPE
/* when fixed, modify "not implemented", catalog/pg_type.h and SGML */
LSEG lseg;
int isopen;
char *s;
if ((!path_decode(TRUE, 2, str, &isopen, &s, &(lseg.p[0])))
|| (*s != '\0'))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TEXT_REPRESENTATION),
errmsg("invalid input syntax for type line: \"%s\"", str)));
line = (LINE *) palloc(sizeof(LINE));
line_construct_pts(line, &lseg.p[0], &lseg.p[1]);
#else
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("type \"line\" not yet implemented")));
line = NULL;
#endif
PG_RETURN_LINE_P(line);
}
Datum
line_out(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
#ifdef ENABLE_LINE_TYPE
LINE *line = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(0);
#endif
char *result;
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
#ifdef ENABLE_LINE_TYPE
/* when fixed, modify "not implemented", catalog/pg_type.h and SGML */
LSEG lseg;
if (FPzero(line->B))
{ /* vertical */
/* use "x = C" */
result->A = -1;
result->B = 0;
result->C = pt1->x;
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("line_out- line is vertical\n");
#endif
#ifdef NOT_USED
result->m = DBL_MAX;
#endif
}
else if (FPzero(line->A))
{ /* horizontal */
/* use "x = C" */
result->A = 0;
result->B = -1;
result->C = pt1->y;
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("line_out- line is horizontal\n");
#endif
#ifdef NOT_USED
result->m = 0.0;
#endif
}
else
{
}
if (FPzero(line->A)) /* horizontal? */
{
}
else if (FPzero(line->B)) /* vertical? */
{
}
else
{
}
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return path_encode(TRUE, 2, (Point *) &(ls->p[0]));
#else
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("type \"line\" not yet implemented")));
result = NULL;
#endif
PG_RETURN_CSTRING(result);
}
2003-05-13 20:03:08 +02:00
/*
* line_recv - converts external binary format to line
*/
Datum
line_recv(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("type \"line\" not yet implemented")));
2003-05-13 20:03:08 +02:00
return 0;
}
/*
* line_send - converts line to binary format
*/
Datum
line_send(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("type \"line\" not yet implemented")));
2003-05-13 20:03:08 +02:00
return 0;
}
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* Conversion routines from one line formula to internal.
* Internal form: Ax+By+C=0
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
/* line_construct_pm()
* point-slope
*/
static LINE *
line_construct_pm(Point *pt, double m)
{
LINE *result = (LINE *) palloc(sizeof(LINE));
/* use "mx - y + yinter = 0" */
result->A = m;
result->B = -1.0;
if (m == DBL_MAX)
result->C = pt->y;
else
result->C = pt->y - m * pt->x;
#ifdef NOT_USED
result->m = m;
#endif
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return result;
}
/*
* Fill already-allocated LINE struct from two points on the line
*/
static void
line_construct_pts(LINE *line, Point *pt1, Point *pt2)
{
if (FPeq(pt1->x, pt2->x))
{ /* vertical */
/* use "x = C" */
line->A = -1;
line->B = 0;
line->C = pt1->x;
#ifdef NOT_USED
line->m = DBL_MAX;
#endif
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("line_construct_pts- line is vertical\n");
#endif
}
else if (FPeq(pt1->y, pt2->y))
{ /* horizontal */
/* use "y = C" */
line->A = 0;
line->B = -1;
line->C = pt1->y;
#ifdef NOT_USED
line->m = 0.0;
#endif
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("line_construct_pts- line is horizontal\n");
#endif
}
else
{
/* use "mx - y + yinter = 0" */
line->A = (pt2->y - pt1->y) / (pt2->x - pt1->x);
line->B = -1.0;
line->C = pt1->y - line->A * pt1->x;
#ifdef NOT_USED
line->m = line->A;
#endif
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("line_construct_pts- line is neither vertical nor horizontal (diffs x=%.*g, y=%.*g\n",
DBL_DIG, (pt2->x - pt1->x), DBL_DIG, (pt2->y - pt1->y));
#endif
}
}
/* line_construct_pp()
* two points
*/
Datum
line_construct_pp(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt1 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
Point *pt2 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
LINE *result = (LINE *) palloc(sizeof(LINE));
line_construct_pts(result, pt1, pt2);
PG_RETURN_LINE_P(result);
}
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* Relative position routines.
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
line_intersect(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LINE *l1 = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(0);
LINE *l2 = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(1);
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
PG_RETURN_BOOL(!DatumGetBool(DirectFunctionCall2(line_parallel,
LinePGetDatum(l1),
LinePGetDatum(l2))));
}
Datum
line_parallel(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LINE *l1 = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(0);
LINE *l2 = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(1);
#ifdef NOT_USED
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(l1->m, l2->m));
#endif
if (FPzero(l1->B))
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPzero(l2->B));
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(l2->A, l1->A * (l2->B / l1->B)));
}
Datum
line_perp(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LINE *l1 = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(0);
LINE *l2 = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(1);
#ifdef NOT_USED
if (l1->m)
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(l2->m / l1->m, -1.0));
else if (l2->m)
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(l1->m / l2->m, -1.0));
#endif
if (FPzero(l1->A))
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPzero(l2->B));
else if (FPzero(l1->B))
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPzero(l2->A));
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(((l1->A * l2->B) / (l1->B * l2->A)), -1.0));
}
Datum
line_vertical(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LINE *line = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(0);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPzero(line->B));
}
Datum
line_horizontal(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LINE *line = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(0);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPzero(line->A));
}
Datum
line_eq(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LINE *l1 = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(0);
LINE *l2 = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(1);
double k;
if (!FPzero(l2->A))
k = l1->A / l2->A;
else if (!FPzero(l2->B))
k = l1->B / l2->B;
else if (!FPzero(l2->C))
k = l1->C / l2->C;
else
k = 1.0;
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(l1->A, k * l2->A) &&
FPeq(l1->B, k * l2->B) &&
FPeq(l1->C, k * l2->C));
}
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* Line arithmetic routines.
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
/* line_distance()
* Distance between two lines.
*/
Datum
line_distance(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LINE *l1 = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(0);
LINE *l2 = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(1);
float8 result;
Point *tmp;
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
if (!DatumGetBool(DirectFunctionCall2(line_parallel,
LinePGetDatum(l1),
LinePGetDatum(l2))))
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(0.0);
if (FPzero(l1->B)) /* vertical? */
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(fabs(l1->C - l2->C));
tmp = point_construct(0.0, l1->C);
result = dist_pl_internal(tmp, l2);
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(result);
}
/* line_interpt()
* Point where two lines l1, l2 intersect (if any)
*/
Datum
line_interpt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LINE *l1 = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(0);
LINE *l2 = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(1);
Point *result;
result = line_interpt_internal(l1, l2);
if (result == NULL)
PG_RETURN_NULL();
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
/*
* Internal version of line_interpt
*
* returns a NULL pointer if no intersection point
*/
static Point *
line_interpt_internal(LINE *l1, LINE *l2)
{
Point *result;
double x,
y;
/*
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
* NOTE: if the lines are identical then we will find they are
* parallel and report "no intersection". This is a little weird, but
* since there's no *unique* intersection, maybe it's appropriate
* behavior.
*/
if (DatumGetBool(DirectFunctionCall2(line_parallel,
LinePGetDatum(l1),
LinePGetDatum(l2))))
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return NULL;
#ifdef NOT_USED
if (FPzero(l1->B)) /* l1 vertical? */
result = point_construct(l2->m * l1->C + l2->C, l1->C);
else if (FPzero(l2->B)) /* l2 vertical? */
result = point_construct(l1->m * l2->C + l1->C, l2->C);
else
{
x = (l1->C - l2->C) / (l2->A - l1->A);
result = point_construct(x, l1->m * x + l1->C);
}
#endif
if (FPzero(l1->B)) /* l1 vertical? */
{
x = l1->C;
y = (l2->A * x + l2->C);
}
else if (FPzero(l2->B)) /* l2 vertical? */
{
x = l2->C;
y = (l1->A * x + l1->C);
}
else
{
x = (l1->C - l2->C) / (l2->A - l1->A);
y = (l1->A * x + l1->C);
}
result = point_construct(x, y);
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("line_interpt- lines are A=%.*g, B=%.*g, C=%.*g, A=%.*g, B=%.*g, C=%.*g\n",
DBL_DIG, l1->A, DBL_DIG, l1->B, DBL_DIG, l1->C, DBL_DIG, l2->A, DBL_DIG, l2->B, DBL_DIG, l2->C);
printf("line_interpt- lines intersect at (%.*g,%.*g)\n", DBL_DIG, x, DBL_DIG, y);
#endif
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return result;
}
/***********************************************************************
**
** Routines for 2D paths (sequences of line segments, also
** called `polylines').
**
** This is not a general package for geometric paths,
** which of course include polygons; the emphasis here
** is on (for example) usefulness in wire layout.
**
***********************************************************************/
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* String to path / path to string conversion.
* External format:
* "((xcoord, ycoord),... )"
* "[(xcoord, ycoord),... ]"
* "(xcoord, ycoord),... "
* "[xcoord, ycoord,... ]"
* Also support older format:
* "(closed, npts, xcoord, ycoord,... )"
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
path_in(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
char *str = PG_GETARG_CSTRING(0);
PATH *path;
int isopen;
char *s;
int npts;
int size;
int depth = 0;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
if ((npts = pair_count(str, ',')) <= 0)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TEXT_REPRESENTATION),
errmsg("invalid input syntax for type path: \"%s\"", str)));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
s = str;
while (isspace((unsigned char) *s))
s++;
/* skip single leading paren */
if ((*s == LDELIM) && (strrchr(s, LDELIM) == s))
{
s++;
depth++;
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
2002-09-04 22:31:48 +02:00
size = offsetof(PATH, p[0]) +sizeof(path->p[0]) * npts;
path = (PATH *) palloc(size);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
path->size = size;
path->npts = npts;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
if ((!path_decode(TRUE, npts, s, &isopen, &s, &(path->p[0])))
&& (!((depth == 0) && (*s == '\0'))) && !((depth >= 1) && (*s == RDELIM)))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TEXT_REPRESENTATION),
errmsg("invalid input syntax for type path: \"%s\"", str)));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
path->closed = (!isopen);
PG_RETURN_PATH_P(path);
}
Datum
path_out(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
PATH *path = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(0);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_CSTRING(path_encode(path->closed, path->npts, path->p));
}
2003-05-13 20:03:08 +02:00
/*
* path_recv - converts external binary format to path
*
* External representation is closed flag (a boolean byte), int32 number
* of points, and the points.
*/
Datum
path_recv(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
StringInfo buf = (StringInfo) PG_GETARG_POINTER(0);
PATH *path;
int closed;
int32 npts;
int32 i;
int size;
closed = pq_getmsgbyte(buf);
npts = pq_getmsgint(buf, sizeof(int32));
if (npts < 0 || npts >= (int32) (INT_MAX / sizeof(Point)))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_BINARY_REPRESENTATION),
errmsg("invalid number of points in external path")));
2003-05-13 20:03:08 +02:00
size = offsetof(PATH, p[0]) +sizeof(path->p[0]) * npts;
path = (PATH *) palloc(size);
path->size = size;
path->npts = npts;
path->closed = (closed ? 1 : 0);
for (i = 0; i < npts; i++)
{
path->p[i].x = pq_getmsgfloat8(buf);
path->p[i].y = pq_getmsgfloat8(buf);
}
PG_RETURN_PATH_P(path);
}
/*
* path_send - converts path to binary format
*/
Datum
path_send(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
PATH *path = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(0);
StringInfoData buf;
int32 i;
pq_begintypsend(&buf);
pq_sendbyte(&buf, path->closed ? 1 : 0);
pq_sendint(&buf, path->npts, sizeof(int32));
for (i = 0; i < path->npts; i++)
{
pq_sendfloat8(&buf, path->p[i].x);
pq_sendfloat8(&buf, path->p[i].y);
}
PG_RETURN_BYTEA_P(pq_endtypsend(&buf));
}
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* Relational operators.
* These are based on the path cardinality,
* as stupid as that sounds.
*
* Better relops and access methods coming soon.
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
path_n_lt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
PATH *p1 = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(0);
PATH *p2 = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(p1->npts < p2->npts);
}
Datum
path_n_gt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
PATH *p1 = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(0);
PATH *p2 = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(p1->npts > p2->npts);
}
Datum
path_n_eq(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
PATH *p1 = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(0);
PATH *p2 = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(p1->npts == p2->npts);
}
Datum
path_n_le(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
PATH *p1 = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(0);
PATH *p2 = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(p1->npts <= p2->npts);
}
Datum
path_n_ge(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
PATH *p1 = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(0);
PATH *p2 = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(p1->npts >= p2->npts);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* Conversion operators.
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
path_isclosed(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
PATH *path = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(0);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_BOOL(path->closed);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
path_isopen(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
PATH *path = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(0);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
PG_RETURN_BOOL(!path->closed);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
path_npoints(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
PATH *path = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(0);
PG_RETURN_INT32(path->npts);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
path_close(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
PATH *path = PG_GETARG_PATH_P_COPY(0);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
path->closed = TRUE;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_PATH_P(path);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
path_open(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
PATH *path = PG_GETARG_PATH_P_COPY(0);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
path->closed = FALSE;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_PATH_P(path);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/* path_inter -
* Does p1 intersect p2 at any point?
* Use bounding boxes for a quick (O(n)) check, then do a
* O(n^2) iterative edge check.
*/
Datum
path_inter(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
PATH *p1 = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(0);
PATH *p2 = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(1);
BOX b1,
b2;
int i,
j;
LSEG seg1,
seg2;
if (p1->npts <= 0 || p2->npts <= 0)
PG_RETURN_BOOL(false);
b1.high.x = b1.low.x = p1->p[0].x;
b1.high.y = b1.low.y = p1->p[0].y;
for (i = 1; i < p1->npts; i++)
{
b1.high.x = Max(p1->p[i].x, b1.high.x);
b1.high.y = Max(p1->p[i].y, b1.high.y);
b1.low.x = Min(p1->p[i].x, b1.low.x);
b1.low.y = Min(p1->p[i].y, b1.low.y);
}
b2.high.x = b2.low.x = p2->p[0].x;
b2.high.y = b2.low.y = p2->p[0].y;
for (i = 1; i < p2->npts; i++)
{
b2.high.x = Max(p2->p[i].x, b2.high.x);
b2.high.y = Max(p2->p[i].y, b2.high.y);
b2.low.x = Min(p2->p[i].x, b2.low.x);
b2.low.y = Min(p2->p[i].y, b2.low.y);
}
if (!box_ov(&b1, &b2))
PG_RETURN_BOOL(false);
/* pairwise check lseg intersections */
for (i = 0; i < p1->npts; i++)
{
int iprev;
if (i > 0)
iprev = i - 1;
else
{
if (!p1->closed)
continue;
iprev = p1->npts - 1; /* include the closure segment */
}
for (j = 0; j < p2->npts; j++)
{
int jprev;
if (j > 0)
jprev = j - 1;
else
{
if (!p2->closed)
continue;
jprev = p2->npts - 1; /* include the closure segment */
}
statlseg_construct(&seg1, &p1->p[iprev], &p1->p[i]);
statlseg_construct(&seg2, &p2->p[jprev], &p2->p[j]);
if (lseg_intersect_internal(&seg1, &seg2))
PG_RETURN_BOOL(true);
}
}
/* if we dropped through, no two segs intersected */
PG_RETURN_BOOL(false);
}
/* path_distance()
* This essentially does a cartesian product of the lsegs in the
* two paths, and finds the min distance between any two lsegs
*/
Datum
path_distance(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
PATH *p1 = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(0);
PATH *p2 = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(1);
float8 min = 0.0; /* initialize to keep compiler quiet */
bool have_min = false;
float8 tmp;
int i,
j;
LSEG seg1,
seg2;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
for (i = 0; i < p1->npts; i++)
{
int iprev;
if (i > 0)
iprev = i - 1;
else
{
if (!p1->closed)
continue;
iprev = p1->npts - 1; /* include the closure segment */
}
for (j = 0; j < p2->npts; j++)
{
int jprev;
if (j > 0)
jprev = j - 1;
else
{
if (!p2->closed)
continue;
jprev = p2->npts - 1; /* include the closure segment */
}
statlseg_construct(&seg1, &p1->p[iprev], &p1->p[i]);
statlseg_construct(&seg2, &p2->p[jprev], &p2->p[j]);
tmp = DatumGetFloat8(DirectFunctionCall2(lseg_distance,
LsegPGetDatum(&seg1),
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
LsegPGetDatum(&seg2)));
if (!have_min || tmp < min)
{
min = tmp;
have_min = true;
}
1997-09-05 20:13:45 +02:00
}
}
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
if (!have_min)
PG_RETURN_NULL();
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(min);
}
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* "Arithmetic" operations.
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
path_length(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
PATH *path = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(0);
float8 result = 0.0;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < path->npts; i++)
{
int iprev;
if (i > 0)
iprev = i - 1;
else
{
if (!path->closed)
continue;
iprev = path->npts - 1; /* include the closure segment */
}
result += point_dt(&path->p[iprev], &path->p[i]);
}
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(result);
}
/***********************************************************************
**
** Routines for 2D points.
**
***********************************************************************/
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* String to point, point to string conversion.
* External format:
* "(x,y)"
* "x,y"
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
point_in(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
char *str = PG_GETARG_CSTRING(0);
Point *point;
double x,
y;
char *s;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
if (!pair_decode(str, &x, &y, &s) || (*s != '\0'))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TEXT_REPRESENTATION),
errmsg("invalid input syntax for type point: \"%s\"", str)));
point = (Point *) palloc(sizeof(Point));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
point->x = x;
point->y = y;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(point);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
point_out(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_CSTRING(path_encode(-1, 1, pt));
}
/*
* point_recv - converts external binary format to point
*/
Datum
point_recv(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
StringInfo buf = (StringInfo) PG_GETARG_POINTER(0);
Point *point;
point = (Point *) palloc(sizeof(Point));
point->x = pq_getmsgfloat8(buf);
point->y = pq_getmsgfloat8(buf);
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(point);
}
/*
* point_send - converts point to binary format
*/
Datum
point_send(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
StringInfoData buf;
pq_begintypsend(&buf);
pq_sendfloat8(&buf, pt->x);
pq_sendfloat8(&buf, pt->y);
PG_RETURN_BYTEA_P(pq_endtypsend(&buf));
}
static Point *
point_construct(double x, double y)
{
Point *result = (Point *) palloc(sizeof(Point));
result->x = x;
result->y = y;
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return result;
}
static Point *
point_copy(Point *pt)
{
Point *result;
if (!PointerIsValid(pt))
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return NULL;
result = (Point *) palloc(sizeof(Point));
result->x = pt->x;
result->y = pt->y;
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return result;
}
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* Relational operators for Points.
* Since we do have a sense of coordinates being
* "equal" to a given accuracy (point_vert, point_horiz),
* the other ops must preserve that sense. This means
* that results may, strictly speaking, be a lie (unless
* EPSILON = 0.0).
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
point_left(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt1 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
Point *pt2 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPlt(pt1->x, pt2->x));
}
Datum
point_right(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt1 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
Point *pt2 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPgt(pt1->x, pt2->x));
}
Datum
point_above(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt1 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
Point *pt2 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPgt(pt1->y, pt2->y));
}
Datum
point_below(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt1 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
Point *pt2 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPlt(pt1->y, pt2->y));
}
Datum
point_vert(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt1 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
Point *pt2 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(pt1->x, pt2->x));
}
Datum
point_horiz(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt1 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
Point *pt2 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(pt1->y, pt2->y));
}
Datum
point_eq(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt1 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
Point *pt2 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(pt1->x, pt2->x) && FPeq(pt1->y, pt2->y));
}
Datum
point_ne(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt1 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
Point *pt2 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPne(pt1->x, pt2->x) || FPne(pt1->y, pt2->y));
}
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* "Arithmetic" operators on points.
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
point_distance(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt1 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
Point *pt2 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(HYPOT(pt1->x - pt2->x, pt1->y - pt2->y));
}
double
point_dt(Point *pt1, Point *pt2)
{
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("point_dt- segment (%f,%f),(%f,%f) length is %f\n",
pt1->x, pt1->y, pt2->x, pt2->y, HYPOT(pt1->x - pt2->x, pt1->y - pt2->y));
#endif
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return HYPOT(pt1->x - pt2->x, pt1->y - pt2->y);
}
Datum
point_slope(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt1 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
Point *pt2 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(point_sl(pt1, pt2));
}
double
point_sl(Point *pt1, Point *pt2)
{
return (FPeq(pt1->x, pt2->x)
? (double) DBL_MAX
: (pt1->y - pt2->y) / (pt1->x - pt2->x));
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/***********************************************************************
**
** Routines for 2D line segments.
**
***********************************************************************/
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* String to lseg, lseg to string conversion.
* External forms: "[(x1, y1), (x2, y2)]"
* "(x1, y1), (x2, y2)"
* "x1, y1, x2, y2"
* closed form ok "((x1, y1), (x2, y2))"
* (old form) "(x1, y1, x2, y2)"
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
lseg_in(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
char *str = PG_GETARG_CSTRING(0);
LSEG *lseg;
int isopen;
char *s;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
lseg = (LSEG *) palloc(sizeof(LSEG));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
if ((!path_decode(TRUE, 2, str, &isopen, &s, &(lseg->p[0])))
|| (*s != '\0'))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TEXT_REPRESENTATION),
errmsg("invalid input syntax for type lseg: \"%s\"", str)));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
#ifdef NOT_USED
lseg->m = point_sl(&lseg->p[0], &lseg->p[1]);
#endif
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_LSEG_P(lseg);
}
Datum
lseg_out(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *ls = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_CSTRING(path_encode(FALSE, 2, (Point *) &(ls->p[0])));
}
2003-05-13 20:03:08 +02:00
/*
* lseg_recv - converts external binary format to lseg
*/
Datum
lseg_recv(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
StringInfo buf = (StringInfo) PG_GETARG_POINTER(0);
LSEG *lseg;
lseg = (LSEG *) palloc(sizeof(LSEG));
lseg->p[0].x = pq_getmsgfloat8(buf);
lseg->p[0].y = pq_getmsgfloat8(buf);
lseg->p[1].x = pq_getmsgfloat8(buf);
lseg->p[1].y = pq_getmsgfloat8(buf);
#ifdef NOT_USED
lseg->m = point_sl(&lseg->p[0], &lseg->p[1]);
#endif
PG_RETURN_LSEG_P(lseg);
}
/*
* lseg_send - converts lseg to binary format
*/
Datum
lseg_send(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *ls = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
StringInfoData buf;
pq_begintypsend(&buf);
pq_sendfloat8(&buf, ls->p[0].x);
pq_sendfloat8(&buf, ls->p[0].y);
pq_sendfloat8(&buf, ls->p[1].x);
pq_sendfloat8(&buf, ls->p[1].y);
PG_RETURN_BYTEA_P(pq_endtypsend(&buf));
}
/* lseg_construct -
* form a LSEG from two Points.
*/
Datum
lseg_construct(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt1 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
Point *pt2 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
LSEG *result = (LSEG *) palloc(sizeof(LSEG));
result->p[0].x = pt1->x;
result->p[0].y = pt1->y;
result->p[1].x = pt2->x;
result->p[1].y = pt2->y;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
#ifdef NOT_USED
result->m = point_sl(pt1, pt2);
#endif
PG_RETURN_LSEG_P(result);
}
/* like lseg_construct, but assume space already allocated */
static void
statlseg_construct(LSEG *lseg, Point *pt1, Point *pt2)
{
lseg->p[0].x = pt1->x;
lseg->p[0].y = pt1->y;
lseg->p[1].x = pt2->x;
lseg->p[1].y = pt2->y;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
#ifdef NOT_USED
lseg->m = point_sl(pt1, pt2);
#endif
}
Datum
lseg_length(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *lseg = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(point_dt(&lseg->p[0], &lseg->p[1]));
}
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* Relative position routines.
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
/*
** find intersection of the two lines, and see if it falls on
** both segments.
*/
Datum
lseg_intersect(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *l1 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
LSEG *l2 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(lseg_intersect_internal(l1, l2));
}
static bool
lseg_intersect_internal(LSEG *l1, LSEG *l2)
{
LINE ln;
Point *interpt;
bool retval;
line_construct_pts(&ln, &l2->p[0], &l2->p[1]);
interpt = interpt_sl(l1, &ln);
if (interpt != NULL && on_ps_internal(interpt, l2))
retval = true; /* interpt on l1 and l2 */
else
retval = false;
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return retval;
}
Datum
lseg_parallel(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *l1 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
LSEG *l2 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(1);
#ifdef NOT_USED
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(l1->m, l2->m));
#endif
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(point_sl(&l1->p[0], &l1->p[1]),
point_sl(&l2->p[0], &l2->p[1])));
}
/* lseg_perp()
* Determine if two line segments are perpendicular.
*
* This code did not get the correct answer for
* '((0,0),(0,1))'::lseg ?-| '((0,0),(1,0))'::lseg
* So, modified it to check explicitly for slope of vertical line
* returned by point_sl() and the results seem better.
* - thomas 1998-01-31
*/
Datum
lseg_perp(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *l1 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
LSEG *l2 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(1);
double m1,
m2;
m1 = point_sl(&(l1->p[0]), &(l1->p[1]));
m2 = point_sl(&(l2->p[0]), &(l2->p[1]));
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("lseg_perp- slopes are %g and %g\n", m1, m2);
#endif
if (FPzero(m1))
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(m2, DBL_MAX));
else if (FPzero(m2))
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(m1, DBL_MAX));
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(m1 / m2, -1.0));
}
Datum
lseg_vertical(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *lseg = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(lseg->p[0].x, lseg->p[1].x));
}
Datum
lseg_horizontal(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *lseg = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(lseg->p[0].y, lseg->p[1].y));
}
Datum
lseg_eq(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *l1 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
LSEG *l2 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(l1->p[0].x, l2->p[0].x) &&
FPeq(l1->p[0].y, l2->p[0].y) &&
FPeq(l1->p[1].x, l2->p[1].x) &&
FPeq(l1->p[1].y, l2->p[1].y));
}
Datum
lseg_ne(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *l1 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
LSEG *l2 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(!FPeq(l1->p[0].x, l2->p[0].x) ||
!FPeq(l1->p[0].y, l2->p[0].y) ||
!FPeq(l1->p[1].x, l2->p[1].x) ||
!FPeq(l1->p[1].y, l2->p[1].y));
}
Datum
lseg_lt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *l1 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
LSEG *l2 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPlt(point_dt(&l1->p[0], &l1->p[1]),
point_dt(&l2->p[0], &l2->p[1])));
}
Datum
lseg_le(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *l1 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
LSEG *l2 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPle(point_dt(&l1->p[0], &l1->p[1]),
point_dt(&l2->p[0], &l2->p[1])));
}
Datum
lseg_gt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *l1 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
LSEG *l2 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPgt(point_dt(&l1->p[0], &l1->p[1]),
point_dt(&l2->p[0], &l2->p[1])));
}
Datum
lseg_ge(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *l1 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
LSEG *l2 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPge(point_dt(&l1->p[0], &l1->p[1]),
point_dt(&l2->p[0], &l2->p[1])));
}
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* Line arithmetic routines.
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
/* lseg_distance -
* If two segments don't intersect, then the closest
* point will be from one of the endpoints to the other
* segment.
*/
Datum
lseg_distance(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *l1 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
LSEG *l2 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(1);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(lseg_dt(l1, l2));
}
/* lseg_dt()
* Distance between two line segments.
* Must check both sets of endpoints to ensure minimum distance is found.
* - thomas 1998-02-01
*/
static double
lseg_dt(LSEG *l1, LSEG *l2)
{
double result,
d;
if (lseg_intersect_internal(l1, l2))
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return 0.0;
d = dist_ps_internal(&l1->p[0], l2);
result = d;
d = dist_ps_internal(&l1->p[1], l2);
result = Min(result, d);
d = dist_ps_internal(&l2->p[0], l1);
result = Min(result, d);
d = dist_ps_internal(&l2->p[1], l1);
result = Min(result, d);
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return result;
}
Datum
lseg_center(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *lseg = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
Point *result;
result = (Point *) palloc(sizeof(Point));
result->x = (lseg->p[0].x + lseg->p[1].x) / 2.0;
result->y = (lseg->p[0].y + lseg->p[1].y) / 2.0;
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
/* lseg_interpt -
* Find the intersection point of two segments (if any).
*/
Datum
lseg_interpt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *l1 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
LSEG *l2 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(1);
Point *result;
LINE tmp1,
tmp2;
/*
* Find the intersection of the appropriate lines, if any.
*/
line_construct_pts(&tmp1, &l1->p[0], &l1->p[1]);
line_construct_pts(&tmp2, &l2->p[0], &l2->p[1]);
result = line_interpt_internal(&tmp1, &tmp2);
if (!PointerIsValid(result))
PG_RETURN_NULL();
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
/*
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
* If the line intersection point isn't within l1 (or equivalently
* l2), there is no valid segment intersection point at all.
*/
if (!on_ps_internal(result, l1) ||
!on_ps_internal(result, l2))
PG_RETURN_NULL();
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
/*
* If there is an intersection, then check explicitly for matching
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
* endpoints since there may be rounding effects with annoying lsb
* residue. - tgl 1997-07-09
*/
if ((FPeq(l1->p[0].x, l2->p[0].x) && FPeq(l1->p[0].y, l2->p[0].y)) ||
(FPeq(l1->p[0].x, l2->p[1].x) && FPeq(l1->p[0].y, l2->p[1].y)))
{
result->x = l1->p[0].x;
result->y = l1->p[0].y;
}
else if ((FPeq(l1->p[1].x, l2->p[0].x) && FPeq(l1->p[1].y, l2->p[0].y)) ||
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
(FPeq(l1->p[1].x, l2->p[1].x) && FPeq(l1->p[1].y, l2->p[1].y)))
{
result->x = l1->p[1].x;
result->y = l1->p[1].y;
}
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
/***********************************************************************
**
** Routines for position comparisons of differently-typed
** 2D objects.
**
***********************************************************************/
/*---------------------------------------------------------------------
* dist_
* Minimum distance from one object to another.
*-------------------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
dist_pl(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
LINE *line = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(1);
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(dist_pl_internal(pt, line));
}
static double
dist_pl_internal(Point *pt, LINE *line)
{
return (line->A * pt->x + line->B * pt->y + line->C) /
HYPOT(line->A, line->B);
}
Datum
dist_ps(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
LSEG *lseg = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(1);
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(dist_ps_internal(pt, lseg));
}
static double
dist_ps_internal(Point *pt, LSEG *lseg)
{
double m; /* slope of perp. */
LINE *ln;
double result,
tmpdist;
Point *ip;
/*
* Construct a line perpendicular to the input segment
* and through the input point
*/
if (lseg->p[1].x == lseg->p[0].x)
m = 0;
else if (lseg->p[1].y == lseg->p[0].y)
{ /* slope is infinite */
m = (double) DBL_MAX;
}
else
m = ((lseg->p[0].y - lseg->p[1].y) / (lseg->p[1].x - lseg->p[0].x));
ln = line_construct_pm(pt, m);
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("dist_ps- line is A=%g B=%g C=%g from (point) slope (%f,%f) %g\n",
ln->A, ln->B, ln->C, pt->x, pt->y, m);
#endif
/*
2002-09-04 22:31:48 +02:00
* Calculate distance to the line segment or to the endpoints of the
* segment.
*/
/* intersection is on the line segment? */
if ((ip = interpt_sl(lseg, ln)) != NULL)
{
result = point_dt(pt, ip);
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("dist_ps- distance is %f to intersection point is (%f,%f)\n",
result, ip->x, ip->y);
#endif
}
else
{
/* intersection is not on line segment */
result = point_dt(pt, &lseg->p[0]);
tmpdist = point_dt(pt, &lseg->p[1]);
if (tmpdist < result)
result = tmpdist;
}
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return result;
}
/*
** Distance from a point to a path
*/
Datum
dist_ppath(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
PATH *path = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(1);
float8 result = 0.0; /* keep compiler quiet */
bool have_min = false;
float8 tmp;
int i;
LSEG lseg;
switch (path->npts)
{
case 0:
/* no points in path? then result is undefined... */
PG_RETURN_NULL();
case 1:
/* one point in path? then get distance between two points... */
result = point_dt(pt, &path->p[0]);
break;
default:
/* make sure the path makes sense... */
Assert(path->npts > 1);
/*
* the distance from a point to a path is the smallest
* distance from the point to any of its constituent segments.
*/
for (i = 0; i < path->npts; i++)
{
int iprev;
if (i > 0)
iprev = i - 1;
else
{
if (!path->closed)
continue;
iprev = path->npts - 1; /* include the closure
* segment */
}
statlseg_construct(&lseg, &path->p[iprev], &path->p[i]);
tmp = dist_ps_internal(pt, &lseg);
if (!have_min || tmp < result)
{
result = tmp;
have_min = true;
}
}
break;
}
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(result);
}
Datum
dist_pb(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
float8 result;
Point *near;
near = DatumGetPointP(DirectFunctionCall2(close_pb,
PointPGetDatum(pt),
BoxPGetDatum(box)));
result = point_dt(near, pt);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(result);
}
Datum
dist_sl(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *lseg = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
LINE *line = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(1);
float8 result,
d2;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
if (has_interpt_sl(lseg, line))
result = 0.0;
else
{
result = dist_pl_internal(&lseg->p[0], line);
d2 = dist_pl_internal(&lseg->p[1], line);
/* XXX shouldn't we take the min not max? */
if (d2 > result)
result = d2;
}
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(result);
}
Datum
dist_sb(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *lseg = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
Point *tmp;
Datum result;
tmp = DatumGetPointP(DirectFunctionCall2(close_sb,
LsegPGetDatum(lseg),
BoxPGetDatum(box)));
result = DirectFunctionCall2(dist_pb,
PointPGetDatum(tmp),
BoxPGetDatum(box));
PG_RETURN_DATUM(result);
}
Datum
dist_lb(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
#ifdef NOT_USED
LINE *line = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(0);
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
#endif
/* need to think about this one for a while */
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("function \"dist_lb\" not implemented")));
PG_RETURN_NULL();
}
Datum
dist_cpoly(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
CIRCLE *circle = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
POLYGON *poly = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(1);
float8 result;
float8 d;
int i;
LSEG seg;
if (point_inside(&(circle->center), poly->npts, poly->p) != 0)
{
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("dist_cpoly- center inside of polygon\n");
#endif
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(0.0);
}
/* initialize distance with segment between first and last points */
seg.p[0].x = poly->p[0].x;
seg.p[0].y = poly->p[0].y;
seg.p[1].x = poly->p[poly->npts - 1].x;
seg.p[1].y = poly->p[poly->npts - 1].y;
result = dist_ps_internal(&circle->center, &seg);
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("dist_cpoly- segment 0/n distance is %f\n", result);
#endif
/* check distances for other segments */
for (i = 0; (i < poly->npts - 1); i++)
{
seg.p[0].x = poly->p[i].x;
seg.p[0].y = poly->p[i].y;
seg.p[1].x = poly->p[i + 1].x;
seg.p[1].y = poly->p[i + 1].y;
d = dist_ps_internal(&circle->center, &seg);
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("dist_cpoly- segment %d distance is %f\n", (i + 1), d);
#endif
if (d < result)
result = d;
}
result -= circle->radius;
if (result < 0)
result = 0;
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(result);
}
/*---------------------------------------------------------------------
* interpt_
* Intersection point of objects.
* We choose to ignore the "point" of intersection between
* lines and boxes, since there are typically two.
*-------------------------------------------------------------------*/
/* Get intersection point of lseg and line; returns NULL if no intersection */
static Point *
interpt_sl(LSEG *lseg, LINE *line)
{
LINE tmp;
Point *p;
line_construct_pts(&tmp, &lseg->p[0], &lseg->p[1]);
p = line_interpt_internal(&tmp, line);
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("interpt_sl- segment is (%.*g %.*g) (%.*g %.*g)\n",
DBL_DIG, lseg->p[0].x, DBL_DIG, lseg->p[0].y, DBL_DIG, lseg->p[1].x, DBL_DIG, lseg->p[1].y);
printf("interpt_sl- segment becomes line A=%.*g B=%.*g C=%.*g\n",
DBL_DIG, tmp.A, DBL_DIG, tmp.B, DBL_DIG, tmp.C);
#endif
if (PointerIsValid(p))
{
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("interpt_sl- intersection point is (%.*g %.*g)\n", DBL_DIG, p->x, DBL_DIG, p->y);
#endif
if (on_ps_internal(p, lseg))
{
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("interpt_sl- intersection point is on segment\n");
#endif
}
else
p = NULL;
1997-09-05 20:13:45 +02:00
}
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return p;
}
/* variant: just indicate if intersection point exists */
static bool
has_interpt_sl(LSEG *lseg, LINE *line)
{
Point *tmp;
tmp = interpt_sl(lseg, line);
if (tmp)
return true;
return false;
}
/*---------------------------------------------------------------------
* close_
* Point of closest proximity between objects.
*-------------------------------------------------------------------*/
/* close_pl -
* The intersection point of a perpendicular of the line
* through the point.
*/
Datum
close_pl(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
LINE *line = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(1);
Point *result;
LINE *tmp;
double invm;
result = (Point *) palloc(sizeof(Point));
#ifdef NOT_USED
if (FPeq(line->A, -1.0) && FPzero(line->B))
{ /* vertical */
}
#endif
if (FPzero(line->B)) /* vertical? */
{
result->x = line->C;
result->y = pt->y;
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
if (FPzero(line->A)) /* horizontal? */
{
result->x = pt->x;
result->y = line->C;
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
/* drop a perpendicular and find the intersection point */
#ifdef NOT_USED
invm = -1.0 / line->m;
#endif
/* invert and flip the sign on the slope to get a perpendicular */
invm = line->B / line->A;
tmp = line_construct_pm(pt, invm);
result = line_interpt_internal(tmp, line);
Assert(result != NULL);
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
/* close_ps()
* Closest point on line segment to specified point.
* Take the closest endpoint if the point is left, right,
* above, or below the segment, otherwise find the intersection
* point of the segment and its perpendicular through the point.
*
* Some tricky code here, relying on boolean expressions
* evaluating to only zero or one to use as an array index.
* bug fixes by gthaker@atl.lmco.com; May 1, 1998
*/
Datum
close_ps(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
LSEG *lseg = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(1);
Point *result = NULL;
LINE *tmp;
double invm;
int xh,
yh;
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("close_sp:pt->x %f pt->y %f\nlseg(0).x %f lseg(0).y %f lseg(1).x %f lseg(1).y %f\n",
pt->x, pt->y, lseg->p[0].x, lseg->p[0].y,
lseg->p[1].x, lseg->p[1].y);
#endif
/* xh (or yh) is the index of upper x( or y) end point of lseg */
/* !xh (or !yh) is the index of lower x( or y) end point of lseg */
xh = lseg->p[0].x < lseg->p[1].x;
yh = lseg->p[0].y < lseg->p[1].y;
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
if (FPeq(lseg->p[0].x, lseg->p[1].x)) /* vertical? */
{
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("close_ps- segment is vertical\n");
#endif
/* first check if point is below or above the entire lseg. */
if (pt->y < lseg->p[!yh].y)
result = point_copy(&lseg->p[!yh]); /* below the lseg */
else if (pt->y > lseg->p[yh].y)
result = point_copy(&lseg->p[yh]); /* above the lseg */
if (result != NULL)
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
/* point lines along (to left or right) of the vertical lseg. */
result = (Point *) palloc(sizeof(Point));
result->x = lseg->p[0].x;
result->y = pt->y;
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
else if (FPeq(lseg->p[0].y, lseg->p[1].y)) /* horizontal? */
{
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("close_ps- segment is horizontal\n");
#endif
/* first check if point is left or right of the entire lseg. */
if (pt->x < lseg->p[!xh].x)
result = point_copy(&lseg->p[!xh]); /* left of the lseg */
else if (pt->x > lseg->p[xh].x)
result = point_copy(&lseg->p[xh]); /* right of the lseg */
if (result != NULL)
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
/* point lines along (at top or below) the horiz. lseg. */
result = (Point *) palloc(sizeof(Point));
result->x = pt->x;
result->y = lseg->p[0].y;
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
/*
* vert. and horiz. cases are down, now check if the closest point is
* one of the end points or someplace on the lseg.
*/
invm = -1.0 / point_sl(&(lseg->p[0]), &(lseg->p[1]));
tmp = line_construct_pm(&lseg->p[!yh], invm); /* lower edge of the
* "band" */
if (pt->y < (tmp->A * pt->x + tmp->C))
{ /* we are below the lower edge */
result = point_copy(&lseg->p[!yh]); /* below the lseg, take
* lower end pt */
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("close_ps below: tmp A %f B %f C %f m %f\n",
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
tmp->A, tmp->B, tmp->C, tmp->m);
#endif
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
tmp = line_construct_pm(&lseg->p[yh], invm); /* upper edge of the
* "band" */
if (pt->y > (tmp->A * pt->x + tmp->C))
{ /* we are below the lower edge */
result = point_copy(&lseg->p[yh]); /* above the lseg, take
* higher end pt */
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("close_ps above: tmp A %f B %f C %f m %f\n",
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
tmp->A, tmp->B, tmp->C, tmp->m);
#endif
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
/*
* at this point the "normal" from point will hit lseg. The closet
* point will be somewhere on the lseg
*/
tmp = line_construct_pm(pt, invm);
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("close_ps- tmp A %f B %f C %f m %f\n",
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
tmp->A, tmp->B, tmp->C, tmp->m);
#endif
result = interpt_sl(lseg, tmp);
Assert(result != NULL);
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("close_ps- result.x %f result.y %f\n", result->x, result->y);
#endif
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
/* close_lseg()
* Closest point to l1 on l2.
*/
Datum
close_lseg(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *l1 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
LSEG *l2 = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(1);
Point *result = NULL;
Point point;
double dist;
double d;
d = dist_ps_internal(&l1->p[0], l2);
dist = d;
memcpy(&point, &l1->p[0], sizeof(Point));
if ((d = dist_ps_internal(&l1->p[1], l2)) < dist)
{
dist = d;
memcpy(&point, &l1->p[1], sizeof(Point));
}
if ((d = dist_ps_internal(&l2->p[0], l1)) < dist)
{
result = DatumGetPointP(DirectFunctionCall2(close_ps,
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
PointPGetDatum(&l2->p[0]),
LsegPGetDatum(l1)));
memcpy(&point, result, sizeof(Point));
result = DatumGetPointP(DirectFunctionCall2(close_ps,
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
PointPGetDatum(&point),
LsegPGetDatum(l2)));
}
if ((d = dist_ps_internal(&l2->p[1], l1)) < dist)
{
result = DatumGetPointP(DirectFunctionCall2(close_ps,
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
PointPGetDatum(&l2->p[1]),
LsegPGetDatum(l1)));
memcpy(&point, result, sizeof(Point));
result = DatumGetPointP(DirectFunctionCall2(close_ps,
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
PointPGetDatum(&point),
LsegPGetDatum(l2)));
}
if (result == NULL)
result = point_copy(&point);
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
/* close_pb()
* Closest point on or in box to specified point.
*/
Datum
close_pb(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
LSEG lseg,
seg;
Point point;
double dist,
d;
if (DatumGetBool(DirectFunctionCall2(on_pb,
PointPGetDatum(pt),
BoxPGetDatum(box))))
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(pt);
/* pairwise check lseg distances */
point.x = box->low.x;
point.y = box->high.y;
statlseg_construct(&lseg, &box->low, &point);
dist = d = dist_ps_internal(pt, &lseg);
statlseg_construct(&seg, &box->high, &point);
if ((d = dist_ps_internal(pt, &seg)) < dist)
{
dist = d;
memcpy(&lseg, &seg, sizeof(lseg));
}
point.x = box->high.x;
point.y = box->low.y;
statlseg_construct(&seg, &box->low, &point);
if ((d = dist_ps_internal(pt, &seg)) < dist)
{
dist = d;
memcpy(&lseg, &seg, sizeof(lseg));
}
statlseg_construct(&seg, &box->high, &point);
if ((d = dist_ps_internal(pt, &seg)) < dist)
{
dist = d;
memcpy(&lseg, &seg, sizeof(lseg));
}
PG_RETURN_DATUM(DirectFunctionCall2(close_ps,
PointPGetDatum(pt),
LsegPGetDatum(&lseg)));
}
/* close_sl()
* Closest point on line to line segment.
*
* XXX THIS CODE IS WRONG
* The code is actually calculating the point on the line segment
* which is backwards from the routine naming convention.
* Copied code to new routine close_ls() but haven't fixed this one yet.
* - thomas 1998-01-31
*/
Datum
close_sl(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *lseg = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
LINE *line = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(1);
Point *result;
float8 d1,
d2;
result = interpt_sl(lseg, line);
if (result)
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
d1 = dist_pl_internal(&lseg->p[0], line);
d2 = dist_pl_internal(&lseg->p[1], line);
if (d1 < d2)
result = point_copy(&lseg->p[0]);
else
result = point_copy(&lseg->p[1]);
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
/* close_ls()
* Closest point on line segment to line.
*/
Datum
close_ls(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LINE *line = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(0);
LSEG *lseg = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(1);
Point *result;
float8 d1,
d2;
result = interpt_sl(lseg, line);
if (result)
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
d1 = dist_pl_internal(&lseg->p[0], line);
d2 = dist_pl_internal(&lseg->p[1], line);
if (d1 < d2)
result = point_copy(&lseg->p[0]);
else
result = point_copy(&lseg->p[1]);
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
/* close_sb()
* Closest point on or in box to line segment.
*/
Datum
close_sb(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *lseg = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
Point point;
LSEG bseg,
seg;
double dist,
d;
/* segment intersects box? then just return closest point to center */
if (DatumGetBool(DirectFunctionCall2(inter_sb,
LsegPGetDatum(lseg),
BoxPGetDatum(box))))
{
box_cn(&point, box);
PG_RETURN_DATUM(DirectFunctionCall2(close_ps,
PointPGetDatum(&point),
LsegPGetDatum(lseg)));
}
/* pairwise check lseg distances */
point.x = box->low.x;
point.y = box->high.y;
statlseg_construct(&bseg, &box->low, &point);
dist = lseg_dt(lseg, &bseg);
statlseg_construct(&seg, &box->high, &point);
if ((d = lseg_dt(lseg, &seg)) < dist)
{
dist = d;
memcpy(&bseg, &seg, sizeof(bseg));
}
point.x = box->high.x;
point.y = box->low.y;
statlseg_construct(&seg, &box->low, &point);
if ((d = lseg_dt(lseg, &seg)) < dist)
{
dist = d;
memcpy(&bseg, &seg, sizeof(bseg));
}
statlseg_construct(&seg, &box->high, &point);
if ((d = lseg_dt(lseg, &seg)) < dist)
{
dist = d;
memcpy(&bseg, &seg, sizeof(bseg));
}
/* OK, we now have the closest line segment on the box boundary */
PG_RETURN_DATUM(DirectFunctionCall2(close_lseg,
LsegPGetDatum(lseg),
LsegPGetDatum(&bseg)));
}
Datum
close_lb(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
#ifdef NOT_USED
LINE *line = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(0);
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
#endif
/* think about this one for a while */
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("function \"close_lb\" not implemented")));
PG_RETURN_NULL();
}
/*---------------------------------------------------------------------
* on_
* Whether one object lies completely within another.
*-------------------------------------------------------------------*/
/* on_pl -
* Does the point satisfy the equation?
*/
Datum
on_pl(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
LINE *line = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPzero(line->A * pt->x + line->B * pt->y + line->C));
}
/* on_ps -
* Determine colinearity by detecting a triangle inequality.
* This algorithm seems to behave nicely even with lsb residues - tgl 1997-07-09
*/
Datum
on_ps(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
LSEG *lseg = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(on_ps_internal(pt, lseg));
}
static bool
on_ps_internal(Point *pt, LSEG *lseg)
{
return FPeq(point_dt(pt, &lseg->p[0]) + point_dt(pt, &lseg->p[1]),
point_dt(&lseg->p[0], &lseg->p[1]));
}
Datum
on_pb(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(pt->x <= box->high.x && pt->x >= box->low.x &&
pt->y <= box->high.y && pt->y >= box->low.y);
}
/* on_ppath -
* Whether a point lies within (on) a polyline.
* If open, we have to (groan) check each segment.
* (uses same algorithm as for point intersecting segment - tgl 1997-07-09)
* If closed, we use the old O(n) ray method for point-in-polygon.
* The ray is horizontal, from pt out to the right.
* Each segment that crosses the ray counts as an
* intersection; note that an endpoint or edge may touch
* but not cross.
* (we can do p-in-p in lg(n), but it takes preprocessing)
*/
Datum
on_ppath(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *pt = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
PATH *path = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(1);
int i,
n;
double a,
b;
1998-10-29 19:11:28 +01:00
/*-- OPEN --*/
if (!path->closed)
1998-10-29 19:11:28 +01:00
{
n = path->npts - 1;
a = point_dt(pt, &path->p[0]);
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
b = point_dt(pt, &path->p[i + 1]);
if (FPeq(a + b,
point_dt(&path->p[i], &path->p[i + 1])))
PG_RETURN_BOOL(true);
a = b;
}
PG_RETURN_BOOL(false);
}
1998-10-29 19:11:28 +01:00
/*-- CLOSED --*/
PG_RETURN_BOOL(point_inside(pt, path->npts, path->p) != 0);
}
Datum
on_sl(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *lseg = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
LINE *line = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(DatumGetBool(DirectFunctionCall2(on_pl,
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
PointPGetDatum(&lseg->p[0]),
LinePGetDatum(line))) &&
DatumGetBool(DirectFunctionCall2(on_pl,
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
PointPGetDatum(&lseg->p[1]),
LinePGetDatum(line))));
}
Datum
on_sb(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *lseg = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(DatumGetBool(DirectFunctionCall2(on_pb,
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
PointPGetDatum(&lseg->p[0]),
BoxPGetDatum(box))) &&
DatumGetBool(DirectFunctionCall2(on_pb,
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
PointPGetDatum(&lseg->p[1]),
BoxPGetDatum(box))));
}
/*---------------------------------------------------------------------
* inter_
* Whether one object intersects another.
*-------------------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
inter_sl(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *lseg = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
LINE *line = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(has_interpt_sl(lseg, line));
}
/* inter_sb()
* Do line segment and box intersect?
*
* Segment completely inside box counts as intersection.
* If you want only segments crossing box boundaries,
* try converting box to path first.
*
* Optimize for non-intersection by checking for box intersection first.
* - thomas 1998-01-30
*/
Datum
inter_sb(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LSEG *lseg = PG_GETARG_LSEG_P(0);
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
BOX lbox;
LSEG bseg;
Point point;
lbox.low.x = Min(lseg->p[0].x, lseg->p[1].x);
lbox.low.y = Min(lseg->p[0].y, lseg->p[1].y);
lbox.high.x = Max(lseg->p[0].x, lseg->p[1].x);
lbox.high.y = Max(lseg->p[0].y, lseg->p[1].y);
/* nothing close to overlap? then not going to intersect */
if (!box_ov(&lbox, box))
PG_RETURN_BOOL(false);
/* an endpoint of segment is inside box? then clearly intersects */
if (DatumGetBool(DirectFunctionCall2(on_pb,
PointPGetDatum(&lseg->p[0]),
BoxPGetDatum(box))) ||
DatumGetBool(DirectFunctionCall2(on_pb,
PointPGetDatum(&lseg->p[1]),
BoxPGetDatum(box))))
PG_RETURN_BOOL(true);
/* pairwise check lseg intersections */
point.x = box->low.x;
point.y = box->high.y;
statlseg_construct(&bseg, &box->low, &point);
if (lseg_intersect_internal(&bseg, lseg))
PG_RETURN_BOOL(true);
statlseg_construct(&bseg, &box->high, &point);
if (lseg_intersect_internal(&bseg, lseg))
PG_RETURN_BOOL(true);
point.x = box->high.x;
point.y = box->low.y;
statlseg_construct(&bseg, &box->low, &point);
if (lseg_intersect_internal(&bseg, lseg))
PG_RETURN_BOOL(true);
statlseg_construct(&bseg, &box->high, &point);
if (lseg_intersect_internal(&bseg, lseg))
PG_RETURN_BOOL(true);
/* if we dropped through, no two segs intersected */
PG_RETURN_BOOL(false);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/* inter_lb()
* Do line and box intersect?
*/
Datum
inter_lb(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
LINE *line = PG_GETARG_LINE_P(0);
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(1);
LSEG bseg;
Point p1,
p2;
/* pairwise check lseg intersections */
p1.x = box->low.x;
p1.y = box->low.y;
p2.x = box->low.x;
p2.y = box->high.y;
statlseg_construct(&bseg, &p1, &p2);
if (has_interpt_sl(&bseg, line))
PG_RETURN_BOOL(true);
p1.x = box->high.x;
p1.y = box->high.y;
statlseg_construct(&bseg, &p1, &p2);
if (has_interpt_sl(&bseg, line))
PG_RETURN_BOOL(true);
p2.x = box->high.x;
p2.y = box->low.y;
statlseg_construct(&bseg, &p1, &p2);
if (has_interpt_sl(&bseg, line))
PG_RETURN_BOOL(true);
p1.x = box->low.x;
p1.y = box->low.y;
statlseg_construct(&bseg, &p1, &p2);
if (has_interpt_sl(&bseg, line))
PG_RETURN_BOOL(true);
/* if we dropped through, no intersection */
PG_RETURN_BOOL(false);
}
/*------------------------------------------------------------------
* The following routines define a data type and operator class for
* POLYGONS .... Part of which (the polygon's bounding box) is built on
* top of the BOX data type.
*
* make_bound_box - create the bounding box for the input polygon
*------------------------------------------------------------------*/
/*---------------------------------------------------------------------
* Make the smallest bounding box for the given polygon.
*---------------------------------------------------------------------*/
static void
make_bound_box(POLYGON *poly)
{
int i;
double x1,
y1,
x2,
y2;
if (poly->npts > 0)
{
x2 = x1 = poly->p[0].x;
y2 = y1 = poly->p[0].y;
for (i = 1; i < poly->npts; i++)
{
if (poly->p[i].x < x1)
x1 = poly->p[i].x;
if (poly->p[i].x > x2)
x2 = poly->p[i].x;
if (poly->p[i].y < y1)
y1 = poly->p[i].y;
if (poly->p[i].y > y2)
y2 = poly->p[i].y;
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
box_fill(&(poly->boundbox), x1, x2, y1, y2);
}
else
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
errmsg("cannot create bounding box for empty polygon")));
}
/*------------------------------------------------------------------
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
* poly_in - read in the polygon from a string specification
*
* External format:
* "((x0,y0),...,(xn,yn))"
* "x0,y0,...,xn,yn"
* also supports the older style "(x1,...,xn,y1,...yn)"
*------------------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
poly_in(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
char *str = PG_GETARG_CSTRING(0);
POLYGON *poly;
int npts;
int size;
int isopen;
char *s;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
if ((npts = pair_count(str, ',')) <= 0)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TEXT_REPRESENTATION),
errmsg("invalid input syntax for type polygon: \"%s\"", str)));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
size = offsetof(POLYGON, p[0]) +sizeof(poly->p[0]) * npts;
poly = (POLYGON *) palloc0(size); /* zero any holes */
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
poly->size = size;
poly->npts = npts;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
if ((!path_decode(FALSE, npts, str, &isopen, &s, &(poly->p[0])))
|| (*s != '\0'))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TEXT_REPRESENTATION),
errmsg("invalid input syntax for type polygon: \"%s\"", str)));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
make_bound_box(poly);
PG_RETURN_POLYGON_P(poly);
}
/*---------------------------------------------------------------
* poly_out - convert internal POLYGON representation to the
* character string format "((f8,f8),...,(f8,f8))"
*---------------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
poly_out(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
POLYGON *poly = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(0);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_CSTRING(path_encode(TRUE, poly->npts, poly->p));
}
2003-05-13 20:03:08 +02:00
/*
* poly_recv - converts external binary format to polygon
*
* External representation is int32 number of points, and the points.
* We recompute the bounding box on read, instead of trusting it to
* be valid. (Checking it would take just as long, so may as well
* omit it from external representation.)
*/
Datum
poly_recv(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
StringInfo buf = (StringInfo) PG_GETARG_POINTER(0);
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
POLYGON *poly;
2003-05-13 20:03:08 +02:00
int32 npts;
int32 i;
int size;
npts = pq_getmsgint(buf, sizeof(int32));
if (npts < 0 || npts >= (int32) ((INT_MAX - offsetof(POLYGON, p[0])) / sizeof(Point)))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_BINARY_REPRESENTATION),
errmsg("invalid number of points in external polygon")));
2003-05-13 20:03:08 +02:00
size = offsetof(POLYGON, p[0]) +sizeof(poly->p[0]) * npts;
poly = (POLYGON *) palloc0(size); /* zero any holes */
poly->size = size;
poly->npts = npts;
for (i = 0; i < npts; i++)
{
poly->p[i].x = pq_getmsgfloat8(buf);
poly->p[i].y = pq_getmsgfloat8(buf);
}
make_bound_box(poly);
PG_RETURN_POLYGON_P(poly);
}
/*
* poly_send - converts polygon to binary format
*/
Datum
poly_send(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
2003-08-04 02:43:34 +02:00
POLYGON *poly = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(0);
2003-05-13 20:03:08 +02:00
StringInfoData buf;
int32 i;
pq_begintypsend(&buf);
pq_sendint(&buf, poly->npts, sizeof(int32));
for (i = 0; i < poly->npts; i++)
{
pq_sendfloat8(&buf, poly->p[i].x);
pq_sendfloat8(&buf, poly->p[i].y);
}
PG_RETURN_BYTEA_P(pq_endtypsend(&buf));
}
/*-------------------------------------------------------
* Is polygon A strictly left of polygon B? i.e. is
* the right most point of A left of the left most point
* of B?
*-------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
poly_left(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
POLYGON *polya = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(0);
POLYGON *polyb = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(1);
bool result;
result = polya->boundbox.high.x < polyb->boundbox.low.x;
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
/*
* Avoid leaking memory for toasted inputs ... needed for rtree
* indexes
*/
PG_FREE_IF_COPY(polya, 0);
PG_FREE_IF_COPY(polyb, 1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(result);
}
/*-------------------------------------------------------
* Is polygon A overlapping or left of polygon B? i.e. is
* the left most point of A left of the right most point
* of B?
*-------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
poly_overleft(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
POLYGON *polya = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(0);
POLYGON *polyb = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(1);
bool result;
result = polya->boundbox.low.x <= polyb->boundbox.high.x;
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
/*
* Avoid leaking memory for toasted inputs ... needed for rtree
* indexes
*/
PG_FREE_IF_COPY(polya, 0);
PG_FREE_IF_COPY(polyb, 1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(result);
}
/*-------------------------------------------------------
* Is polygon A strictly right of polygon B? i.e. is
* the left most point of A right of the right most point
* of B?
*-------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
poly_right(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
POLYGON *polya = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(0);
POLYGON *polyb = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(1);
bool result;
result = polya->boundbox.low.x > polyb->boundbox.high.x;
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
/*
* Avoid leaking memory for toasted inputs ... needed for rtree
* indexes
*/
PG_FREE_IF_COPY(polya, 0);
PG_FREE_IF_COPY(polyb, 1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(result);
}
/*-------------------------------------------------------
* Is polygon A overlapping or right of polygon B? i.e. is
* the right most point of A right of the left most point
* of B?
*-------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
poly_overright(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
POLYGON *polya = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(0);
POLYGON *polyb = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(1);
bool result;
result = polya->boundbox.high.x > polyb->boundbox.low.x;
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
/*
* Avoid leaking memory for toasted inputs ... needed for rtree
* indexes
*/
PG_FREE_IF_COPY(polya, 0);
PG_FREE_IF_COPY(polyb, 1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(result);
}
/*-------------------------------------------------------
* Is polygon A the same as polygon B? i.e. are all the
* points the same?
* Check all points for matches in both forward and reverse
* direction since polygons are non-directional and are
* closed shapes.
*-------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
poly_same(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
POLYGON *polya = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(0);
POLYGON *polyb = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(1);
bool result;
if (polya->npts != polyb->npts)
result = false;
else
result = plist_same(polya->npts, polya->p, polyb->p);
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
/*
* Avoid leaking memory for toasted inputs ... needed for rtree
* indexes
*/
PG_FREE_IF_COPY(polya, 0);
PG_FREE_IF_COPY(polyb, 1);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_BOOL(result);
}
/*-----------------------------------------------------------------
* Determine if polygon A overlaps polygon B by determining if
* their bounding boxes overlap.
*
* XXX ought to do a more correct check?
*-----------------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
poly_overlap(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
POLYGON *polya = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(0);
POLYGON *polyb = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(1);
bool result;
result = box_ov(&polya->boundbox, &polyb->boundbox);
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
/*
* Avoid leaking memory for toasted inputs ... needed for rtree
* indexes
*/
PG_FREE_IF_COPY(polya, 0);
PG_FREE_IF_COPY(polyb, 1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(result);
}
/*-----------------------------------------------------------------
* Determine if polygon A contains polygon B.
*-----------------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
poly_contain(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
POLYGON *polya = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(0);
POLYGON *polyb = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(1);
bool result;
int i;
/*
* Quick check to see if bounding box is contained.
*/
if (DatumGetBool(DirectFunctionCall2(box_contain,
BoxPGetDatum(&polya->boundbox),
BoxPGetDatum(&polyb->boundbox))))
{
result = true; /* assume true for now */
for (i = 0; i < polyb->npts; i++)
{
if (point_inside(&(polyb->p[i]), polya->npts, &(polya->p[0])) == 0)
{
#if GEODEBUG
printf("poly_contain- point (%f,%f) not in polygon\n", polyb->p[i].x, polyb->p[i].y);
#endif
result = false;
break;
}
}
if (result)
{
for (i = 0; i < polya->npts; i++)
{
if (point_inside(&(polya->p[i]), polyb->npts, &(polyb->p[0])) == 1)
{
#if GEODEBUG
printf("poly_contain- point (%f,%f) in polygon\n", polya->p[i].x, polya->p[i].y);
#endif
result = false;
break;
}
}
}
1997-09-05 20:13:45 +02:00
}
else
{
#if GEODEBUG
printf("poly_contain- bound box ((%f,%f),(%f,%f)) not inside ((%f,%f),(%f,%f))\n",
polyb->boundbox.low.x, polyb->boundbox.low.y, polyb->boundbox.high.x, polyb->boundbox.high.y,
polya->boundbox.low.x, polya->boundbox.low.y, polya->boundbox.high.x, polya->boundbox.high.y);
#endif
result = false;
}
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
/*
* Avoid leaking memory for toasted inputs ... needed for rtree
* indexes
*/
PG_FREE_IF_COPY(polya, 0);
PG_FREE_IF_COPY(polyb, 1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(result);
}
/*-----------------------------------------------------------------
* Determine if polygon A is contained by polygon B by determining
* if A's bounding box is contained by B's bounding box.
*-----------------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
poly_contained(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Datum polya = PG_GETARG_DATUM(0);
Datum polyb = PG_GETARG_DATUM(1);
PG_RETURN_DATUM(DirectFunctionCall2(poly_contain, polyb, polya));
}
/* poly_contain_pt()
* Test to see if the point is inside the polygon.
* Code adapted from integer-based routines in
* Wn: A Server for the HTTP
* File: wn/image.c
* Version 1.15.1
* Copyright (C) 1995 <by John Franks>
* (code offered for use by J. Franks in Linux Journal letter.)
*/
Datum
poly_contain_pt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
POLYGON *poly = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(0);
Point *p = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(point_inside(p, poly->npts, poly->p) != 0);
}
Datum
pt_contained_poly(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *p = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
POLYGON *poly = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(point_inside(p, poly->npts, poly->p) != 0);
}
Datum
poly_distance(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
#ifdef NOT_USED
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
POLYGON *polya = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(0);
POLYGON *polyb = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(1);
#endif
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("function \"poly_distance\" not implemented")));
PG_RETURN_NULL();
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/***********************************************************************
**
** Routines for 2D points.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
**
***********************************************************************/
Datum
construct_point(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
float8 x = PG_GETARG_FLOAT8(0);
float8 y = PG_GETARG_FLOAT8(1);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(point_construct(x, y));
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
point_add(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
Point *p1 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
Point *p2 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
Point *result;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result = (Point *) palloc(sizeof(Point));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result->x = (p1->x + p2->x);
result->y = (p1->y + p2->y);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
point_sub(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
Point *p1 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
Point *p2 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
Point *result;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result = (Point *) palloc(sizeof(Point));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result->x = (p1->x - p2->x);
result->y = (p1->y - p2->y);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
point_mul(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
Point *p1 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
Point *p2 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
Point *result;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result = (Point *) palloc(sizeof(Point));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result->x = (p1->x * p2->x) - (p1->y * p2->y);
result->y = (p1->x * p2->y) + (p1->y * p2->x);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
point_div(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
Point *p1 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
Point *p2 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
Point *result;
double div;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result = (Point *) palloc(sizeof(Point));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
div = (p2->x * p2->x) + (p2->y * p2->y);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
if (div == 0.0)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_DIVISION_BY_ZERO),
errmsg("division by zero")));
result->x = ((p1->x * p2->x) + (p1->y * p2->y)) / div;
result->y = ((p2->x * p1->y) - (p2->y * p1->x)) / div;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/***********************************************************************
**
** Routines for 2D boxes.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
**
***********************************************************************/
Datum
points_box(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
Point *p1 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
Point *p2 = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_BOX_P(box_construct(p1->x, p2->x, p1->y, p2->y));
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
box_add(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
Point *p = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_BOX_P(box_construct((box->high.x + p->x),
(box->low.x + p->x),
(box->high.y + p->y),
(box->low.y + p->y)));
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
box_sub(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
Point *p = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_BOX_P(box_construct((box->high.x - p->x),
(box->low.x - p->x),
(box->high.y - p->y),
(box->low.y - p->y)));
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
box_mul(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
Point *p = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
BOX *result;
Point *high,
*low;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
high = DatumGetPointP(DirectFunctionCall2(point_mul,
PointPGetDatum(&box->high),
PointPGetDatum(p)));
low = DatumGetPointP(DirectFunctionCall2(point_mul,
PointPGetDatum(&box->low),
PointPGetDatum(p)));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result = box_construct(high->x, low->x, high->y, low->y);
PG_RETURN_BOX_P(result);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
box_div(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
Point *p = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
BOX *result;
Point *high,
*low;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
high = DatumGetPointP(DirectFunctionCall2(point_div,
PointPGetDatum(&box->high),
PointPGetDatum(p)));
low = DatumGetPointP(DirectFunctionCall2(point_div,
PointPGetDatum(&box->low),
PointPGetDatum(p)));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result = box_construct(high->x, low->x, high->y, low->y);
PG_RETURN_BOX_P(result);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/***********************************************************************
**
** Routines for 2D paths.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
**
***********************************************************************/
/* path_add()
* Concatenate two paths (only if they are both open).
*/
Datum
path_add(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
PATH *p1 = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(0);
PATH *p2 = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(1);
PATH *result;
int size,
base_size;
int i;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
if (p1->closed || p2->closed)
PG_RETURN_NULL();
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
base_size = sizeof(p1->p[0]) * (p1->npts + p2->npts);
2002-09-04 22:31:48 +02:00
size = offsetof(PATH, p[0]) +base_size;
/* Check for integer overflow */
if (base_size / sizeof(p1->p[0]) != (p1->npts + p2->npts) ||
size <= base_size)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_PROGRAM_LIMIT_EXCEEDED),
errmsg("too many points requested")));
result = (PATH *) palloc(size);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result->size = size;
result->npts = (p1->npts + p2->npts);
result->closed = p1->closed;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
for (i = 0; i < p1->npts; i++)
{
result->p[i].x = p1->p[i].x;
result->p[i].y = p1->p[i].y;
}
for (i = 0; i < p2->npts; i++)
{
result->p[i + p1->npts].x = p2->p[i].x;
result->p[i + p1->npts].y = p2->p[i].y;
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_PATH_P(result);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/* path_add_pt()
* Translation operators.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
path_add_pt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
PATH *path = PG_GETARG_PATH_P_COPY(0);
Point *point = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
int i;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
for (i = 0; i < path->npts; i++)
{
path->p[i].x += point->x;
path->p[i].y += point->y;
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_PATH_P(path);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
path_sub_pt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
PATH *path = PG_GETARG_PATH_P_COPY(0);
Point *point = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
int i;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
for (i = 0; i < path->npts; i++)
{
path->p[i].x -= point->x;
path->p[i].y -= point->y;
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_PATH_P(path);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/* path_mul_pt()
* Rotation and scaling operators.
*/
Datum
path_mul_pt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
PATH *path = PG_GETARG_PATH_P_COPY(0);
Point *point = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
Point *p;
int i;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
for (i = 0; i < path->npts; i++)
{
p = DatumGetPointP(DirectFunctionCall2(point_mul,
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
PointPGetDatum(&path->p[i]),
PointPGetDatum(point)));
path->p[i].x = p->x;
path->p[i].y = p->y;
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_PATH_P(path);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
path_div_pt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
PATH *path = PG_GETARG_PATH_P_COPY(0);
Point *point = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
Point *p;
int i;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
for (i = 0; i < path->npts; i++)
{
p = DatumGetPointP(DirectFunctionCall2(point_div,
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
PointPGetDatum(&path->p[i]),
PointPGetDatum(point)));
path->p[i].x = p->x;
path->p[i].y = p->y;
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_PATH_P(path);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
path_center(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
#ifdef NOT_USED
PATH *path = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(0);
#endif
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("function \"path_center\" not implemented")));
PG_RETURN_NULL();
}
Datum
path_poly(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
PATH *path = PG_GETARG_PATH_P(0);
POLYGON *poly;
int size;
int i;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/* This is not very consistent --- other similar cases return NULL ... */
if (!path->closed)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
errmsg("open path cannot be converted to polygon")));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
size = offsetof(POLYGON, p[0]) +sizeof(poly->p[0]) * path->npts;
poly = (POLYGON *) palloc(size);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
poly->size = size;
poly->npts = path->npts;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
for (i = 0; i < path->npts; i++)
{
poly->p[i].x = path->p[i].x;
poly->p[i].y = path->p[i].y;
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
make_bound_box(poly);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_POLYGON_P(poly);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/***********************************************************************
**
** Routines for 2D polygons.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
**
***********************************************************************/
Datum
poly_npoints(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
POLYGON *poly = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(0);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_INT32(poly->npts);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
poly_center(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
POLYGON *poly = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(0);
Datum result;
CIRCLE *circle;
circle = DatumGetCircleP(DirectFunctionCall1(poly_circle,
PolygonPGetDatum(poly)));
result = DirectFunctionCall1(circle_center,
CirclePGetDatum(circle));
PG_RETURN_DATUM(result);
}
Datum
poly_box(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
POLYGON *poly = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(0);
BOX *box;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
if (poly->npts < 1)
PG_RETURN_NULL();
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
box = box_copy(&poly->boundbox);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_BOX_P(box);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/* box_poly()
* Convert a box to a polygon.
*/
Datum
box_poly(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
POLYGON *poly;
int size;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/* map four corners of the box to a polygon */
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
size = offsetof(POLYGON, p[0]) +sizeof(poly->p[0]) * 4;
poly = (POLYGON *) palloc(size);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
poly->size = size;
poly->npts = 4;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
poly->p[0].x = box->low.x;
poly->p[0].y = box->low.y;
poly->p[1].x = box->low.x;
poly->p[1].y = box->high.y;
poly->p[2].x = box->high.x;
poly->p[2].y = box->high.y;
poly->p[3].x = box->high.x;
poly->p[3].y = box->low.y;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
box_fill(&poly->boundbox, box->high.x, box->low.x,
box->high.y, box->low.y);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_POLYGON_P(poly);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
poly_path(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
POLYGON *poly = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(0);
PATH *path;
int size;
int i;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
size = offsetof(PATH, p[0]) +sizeof(path->p[0]) * poly->npts;
path = (PATH *) palloc(size);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
path->size = size;
path->npts = poly->npts;
path->closed = TRUE;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
for (i = 0; i < poly->npts; i++)
{
path->p[i].x = poly->p[i].x;
path->p[i].y = poly->p[i].y;
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_PATH_P(path);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/***********************************************************************
**
** Routines for circles.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
**
***********************************************************************/
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* Formatting and conversion routines.
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
/* circle_in - convert a string to internal form.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*
* External format: (center and radius of circle)
* "((f8,f8)<f8>)"
* also supports quick entry style "(f8,f8,f8)"
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
circle_in(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
char *str = PG_GETARG_CSTRING(0);
CIRCLE *circle;
char *s,
*cp;
int depth = 0;
circle = (CIRCLE *) palloc(sizeof(CIRCLE));
s = str;
while (isspace((unsigned char) *s))
s++;
if ((*s == LDELIM_C) || (*s == LDELIM))
{
depth++;
cp = (s + 1);
while (isspace((unsigned char) *cp))
cp++;
if (*cp == LDELIM)
s = cp;
1997-09-05 20:13:45 +02:00
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
if (!pair_decode(s, &circle->center.x, &circle->center.y, &s))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TEXT_REPRESENTATION),
errmsg("invalid input syntax for type circle: \"%s\"", str)));
if (*s == DELIM)
s++;
while (isspace((unsigned char) *s))
s++;
if ((!single_decode(s, &circle->radius, &s)) || (circle->radius < 0))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TEXT_REPRESENTATION),
errmsg("invalid input syntax for type circle: \"%s\"", str)));
while (depth > 0)
{
if ((*s == RDELIM)
|| ((*s == RDELIM_C) && (depth == 1)))
{
depth--;
s++;
while (isspace((unsigned char) *s))
s++;
}
else
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TEXT_REPRESENTATION),
errmsg("invalid input syntax for type circle: \"%s\"", str)));
1997-09-05 20:13:45 +02:00
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
if (*s != '\0')
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TEXT_REPRESENTATION),
errmsg("invalid input syntax for type circle: \"%s\"", str)));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_CIRCLE_P(circle);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/* circle_out - convert a circle to external form.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
circle_out(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
char *result;
char *cp;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result = palloc(2 * P_MAXLEN + 6);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
cp = result;
*cp++ = LDELIM_C;
*cp++ = LDELIM;
if (!pair_encode(circle->center.x, circle->center.y, cp))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
errmsg("could not format circle")));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
cp += strlen(cp);
*cp++ = RDELIM;
*cp++ = DELIM;
if (!single_encode(circle->radius, cp))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
errmsg("could not format circle")));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
cp += strlen(cp);
*cp++ = RDELIM_C;
*cp = '\0';
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_CSTRING(result);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
2003-05-13 20:03:08 +02:00
/*
* circle_recv - converts external binary format to circle
*/
Datum
circle_recv(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
StringInfo buf = (StringInfo) PG_GETARG_POINTER(0);
CIRCLE *circle;
circle = (CIRCLE *) palloc(sizeof(CIRCLE));
circle->center.x = pq_getmsgfloat8(buf);
circle->center.y = pq_getmsgfloat8(buf);
circle->radius = pq_getmsgfloat8(buf);
if (circle->radius < 0)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_BINARY_REPRESENTATION),
errmsg("invalid radius in external circle")));
2003-05-13 20:03:08 +02:00
PG_RETURN_CIRCLE_P(circle);
}
/*
* circle_send - converts circle to binary format
*/
Datum
circle_send(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
CIRCLE *circle = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
StringInfoData buf;
pq_begintypsend(&buf);
pq_sendfloat8(&buf, circle->center.x);
pq_sendfloat8(&buf, circle->center.y);
pq_sendfloat8(&buf, circle->radius);
PG_RETURN_BYTEA_P(pq_endtypsend(&buf));
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* Relational operators for CIRCLEs.
* <, >, <=, >=, and == are based on circle area.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
/* circles identical?
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
circle_same(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(circle1->radius, circle2->radius) &&
FPeq(circle1->center.x, circle2->center.x) &&
FPeq(circle1->center.y, circle2->center.y));
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/* circle_overlap - does circle1 overlap circle2?
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
circle_overlap(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPle(point_dt(&circle1->center, &circle2->center),
circle1->radius + circle2->radius));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
/* circle_overleft - is the right edge of circle1 to the left of
* the right edge of circle2?
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
circle_overleft(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPle((circle1->center.x + circle1->radius),
(circle2->center.x + circle2->radius)));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
/* circle_left - is circle1 strictly left of circle2?
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
circle_left(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPle((circle1->center.x + circle1->radius),
(circle2->center.x - circle2->radius)));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
/* circle_right - is circle1 strictly right of circle2?
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
circle_right(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPge((circle1->center.x - circle1->radius),
(circle2->center.x + circle2->radius)));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
/* circle_overright - is the left edge of circle1 to the right of
* the left edge of circle2?
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
circle_overright(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPge((circle1->center.x - circle1->radius),
(circle2->center.x - circle2->radius)));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
/* circle_contained - is circle1 contained by circle2?
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
circle_contained(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPle((point_dt(&circle1->center, &circle2->center) + circle1->radius), circle2->radius));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
/* circle_contain - does circle1 contain circle2?
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
circle_contain(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPle((point_dt(&circle1->center, &circle2->center) + circle2->radius), circle1->radius));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
/* circle_positionop -
* is circle1 entirely {above,below} circle2?
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
circle_below(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPle(circle1->center.y + circle1->radius,
circle2->center.y - circle2->radius));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
Datum
circle_above(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPge(circle1->center.y - circle1->radius,
circle2->center.y + circle2->radius));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
/* circle_relop - is area(circle1) relop area(circle2), within
* our accuracy constraint?
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
circle_eq(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPeq(circle_ar(circle1), circle_ar(circle2)));
}
Datum
circle_ne(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPne(circle_ar(circle1), circle_ar(circle2)));
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
circle_lt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPlt(circle_ar(circle1), circle_ar(circle2)));
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
circle_gt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPgt(circle_ar(circle1), circle_ar(circle2)));
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
circle_le(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPle(circle_ar(circle1), circle_ar(circle2)));
}
Datum
circle_ge(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPge(circle_ar(circle1), circle_ar(circle2)));
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* "Arithmetic" operators on circles.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
static CIRCLE *
circle_copy(CIRCLE *circle)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *result;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
if (!PointerIsValid(circle))
return NULL;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result = (CIRCLE *) palloc(sizeof(CIRCLE));
memcpy((char *) result, (char *) circle, sizeof(CIRCLE));
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return result;
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/* circle_add_pt()
* Translation operator.
*/
Datum
circle_add_pt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
Point *point = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
CIRCLE *result;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result = circle_copy(circle);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result->center.x += point->x;
result->center.y += point->y;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_CIRCLE_P(result);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
circle_sub_pt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
Point *point = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
CIRCLE *result;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result = circle_copy(circle);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result->center.x -= point->x;
result->center.y -= point->y;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_CIRCLE_P(result);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/* circle_mul_pt()
* Rotation and scaling operators.
*/
Datum
circle_mul_pt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
Point *point = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
CIRCLE *result;
Point *p;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result = circle_copy(circle);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
p = DatumGetPointP(DirectFunctionCall2(point_mul,
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
PointPGetDatum(&circle->center),
PointPGetDatum(point)));
result->center.x = p->x;
result->center.y = p->y;
result->radius *= HYPOT(point->x, point->y);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_CIRCLE_P(result);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
Datum
circle_div_pt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
Point *point = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
CIRCLE *result;
Point *p;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result = circle_copy(circle);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
p = DatumGetPointP(DirectFunctionCall2(point_div,
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
PointPGetDatum(&circle->center),
PointPGetDatum(point)));
result->center.x = p->x;
result->center.y = p->y;
result->radius /= HYPOT(point->x, point->y);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_CIRCLE_P(result);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/* circle_area - returns the area of the circle.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
circle_area(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(circle_ar(circle));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
/* circle_diameter - returns the diameter of the circle.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
circle_diameter(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(2 * circle->radius);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
/* circle_radius - returns the radius of the circle.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
circle_radius(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(circle->radius);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
/* circle_distance - returns the distance between
* two circles.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
circle_distance(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
float8 result;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result = point_dt(&circle1->center, &circle2->center)
- (circle1->radius + circle2->radius);
if (result < 0)
result = 0;
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(result);
}
Datum
circle_contain_pt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
CIRCLE *circle = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
Point *point = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(1);
double d;
d = point_dt(&circle->center, point);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(d <= circle->radius);
}
Datum
pt_contained_circle(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *point = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
double d;
d = point_dt(&circle->center, point);
PG_RETURN_BOOL(d <= circle->radius);
}
/* dist_pc - returns the distance between
* a point and a circle.
*/
Datum
dist_pc(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
Point *point = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
float8 result;
result = point_dt(point, &circle->center) - circle->radius;
if (result < 0)
result = 0;
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(result);
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
/* circle_center - returns the center point of the circle.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
circle_center(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
CIRCLE *circle = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
Point *result;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result = (Point *) palloc(sizeof(Point));
result->x = circle->center.x;
result->y = circle->center.y;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_POINT_P(result);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
/* circle_ar - returns the area of the circle.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
static double
circle_ar(CIRCLE *circle)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
return M_PI * (circle->radius * circle->radius);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
/*----------------------------------------------------------
* Conversion operators.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*---------------------------------------------------------*/
Datum
cr_circle(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
Point *center = PG_GETARG_POINT_P(0);
float8 radius = PG_GETARG_FLOAT8(1);
CIRCLE *result;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result = (CIRCLE *) palloc(sizeof(CIRCLE));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
result->center.x = center->x;
result->center.y = center->y;
result->radius = radius;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_CIRCLE_P(result);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
Datum
circle_box(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
CIRCLE *circle = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0);
BOX *box;
double delta;
box = (BOX *) palloc(sizeof(BOX));
delta = circle->radius / sqrt(2.0);
box->high.x = circle->center.x + delta;
box->low.x = circle->center.x - delta;
box->high.y = circle->center.y + delta;
box->low.y = circle->center.y - delta;
PG_RETURN_BOX_P(box);
}
/* box_circle()
* Convert a box to a circle.
*/
Datum
box_circle(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
BOX *box = PG_GETARG_BOX_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle;
circle = (CIRCLE *) palloc(sizeof(CIRCLE));
circle->center.x = (box->high.x + box->low.x) / 2;
circle->center.y = (box->high.y + box->low.y) / 2;
circle->radius = point_dt(&circle->center, &box->high);
PG_RETURN_CIRCLE_P(circle);
}
Datum
circle_poly(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
int32 npts = PG_GETARG_INT32(0);
CIRCLE *circle = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1);
POLYGON *poly;
int base_size,
size;
int i;
double angle;
double anglestep;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
if (FPzero(circle->radius))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("cannot convert zero-size circle to polygon")));
if (npts < 2)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
errmsg("must request at least 2 points")));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
base_size = sizeof(poly->p[0]) * npts;
2002-09-04 22:31:48 +02:00
size = offsetof(POLYGON, p[0]) +base_size;
/* Check for integer overflow */
if (base_size / npts != sizeof(poly->p[0]) || size <= base_size)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_PROGRAM_LIMIT_EXCEEDED),
errmsg("too many points requested")));
poly = (POLYGON *) palloc0(size); /* zero any holes */
poly->size = size;
poly->npts = npts;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
anglestep = (2.0 * M_PI) / npts;
for (i = 0; i < npts; i++)
{
angle = i * anglestep;
poly->p[i].x = circle->center.x - (circle->radius * cos(angle));
poly->p[i].y = circle->center.y + (circle->radius * sin(angle));
}
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
make_bound_box(poly);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_POLYGON_P(poly);
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
}
/* poly_circle - convert polygon to circle
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*
* XXX This algorithm should use weighted means of line segments
* rather than straight average values of points - tgl 97/01/21.
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
*/
Datum
poly_circle(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
{
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
POLYGON *poly = PG_GETARG_POLYGON_P(0);
CIRCLE *circle;
int i;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
if (poly->npts < 2)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
errmsg("cannot convert empty polygon to circle")));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
circle = (CIRCLE *) palloc(sizeof(CIRCLE));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
circle->center.x = 0;
circle->center.y = 0;
circle->radius = 0;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
for (i = 0; i < poly->npts; i++)
{
circle->center.x += poly->p[i].x;
circle->center.y += poly->p[i].y;
}
circle->center.x /= poly->npts;
circle->center.y /= poly->npts;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
for (i = 0; i < poly->npts; i++)
circle->radius += point_dt(&poly->p[i], &circle->center);
circle->radius /= poly->npts;
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
if (FPzero(circle->radius))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
errmsg("cannot convert empty polygon to circle")));
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov> OK, here are a passel of patches for the geometric data types. These add a "circle" data type, new operators and functions for the existing data types, and change the default formats for some of the existing types to make them consistant with each other. Current formatting conventions (e.g. compatible with v6.0 to allow dump/reload) are supported, but the new conventions should be an improvement and we can eventually drop the old conventions entirely. For example, there are two kinds of paths (connected line segments), open and closed, and the old format was '(1,2,1,2,3,4)' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '(0,2,1,2,3,4)' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) Pretty arcane, huh? The new format for paths is '((1,2),(3,4))' for a closed path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) '[(1,2),(3,4)]' for an open path with two points (1,2) and (3,4) For polygons, the old convention is '(0,4,2,0,4,3)' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) and the new convention is '((0,0),(4,4),(2,3))' for a triangle with points at (0,0),(4,4), and (2,3) Other data types which are also represented as lists of points (e.g. boxes, line segments, and polygons) have similar representations (they surround each point with parens). For v6.1, any format which can be interpreted as the old style format is decoded as such; we can remove that backwards compatibility but ugly convention for v7.0. This will allow dump/reloads from v6.0. These include some updates to the regression test files to change the test for creating a data type from "circle" to "widget" to keep the test from trashing the new builtin circle type.
1997-04-22 19:35:09 +02:00
PG_RETURN_CIRCLE_P(circle);
}
/***********************************************************************
**
** Private routines for multiple types.
**
***********************************************************************/
#define HIT_IT INT_MAX
static int
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
point_inside(Point *p, int npts, Point *plist)
{
double x0,
y0;
double px,
py;
int i;
double x,
y;
int cross,
crossnum;
/*
* We calculate crossnum, which is twice the crossing number of a
* ray from the origin parallel to the positive X axis.
* A coordinate change is made to move the test point to the origin.
* Then the function lseg_crossing() is called to calculate the crossnum of
* one segment of the translated polygon with the ray which is the
* positive X-axis.
*/
crossnum = 0;
i = 0;
if (npts <= 0)
return 0;
x0 = plist[0].x - p->x;
y0 = plist[0].y - p->y;
px = x0;
py = y0;
for (i = 1; i < npts; i++)
{
x = plist[i].x - p->x;
y = plist[i].y - p->y;
if ((cross = lseg_crossing(x, y, px, py)) == HIT_IT)
return 2;
crossnum += cross;
px = x;
py = y;
}
if ((cross = lseg_crossing(x0, y0, px, py)) == HIT_IT)
return 2;
crossnum += cross;
if (crossnum != 0)
return 1;
return 0;
}
/* lseg_crossing()
* The function lseg_crossing() returns +2, or -2 if the segment from (x,y)
* to previous (x,y) crosses the positive X-axis positively or negatively.
* It returns +1 or -1 if one endpoint is on this ray, or 0 if both are.
* It returns 0 if the ray and the segment don't intersect.
* It returns HIT_IT if the segment contains (0,0)
*/
static int
lseg_crossing(double x, double y, double px, double py)
{
double z;
int sgn;
/* If (px,py) = (0,0) and not first call we have already sent HIT_IT */
if (FPzero(y))
{
if (FPzero(x))
{
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return HIT_IT;
}
else if (FPgt(x, 0))
{
if (FPzero(py))
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return FPgt(px, 0) ? 0 : HIT_IT;
return FPlt(py, 0) ? 1 : -1;
}
else
{ /* x < 0 */
if (FPzero(py))
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return FPlt(px, 0) ? 0 : HIT_IT;
return 0;
}
1997-09-05 20:13:45 +02:00
}
/* Now we know y != 0; set sgn to sign of y */
sgn = (FPgt(y, 0) ? 1 : -1);
if (FPzero(py))
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return FPlt(px, 0) ? 0 : sgn;
if (FPgt((sgn * py), 0))
{ /* y and py have same sign */
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return 0;
}
else
{ /* y and py have opposite signs */
if (FPge(x, 0) && FPgt(px, 0))
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return 2 * sgn;
if (FPlt(x, 0) && FPle(px, 0))
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return 0;
z = (x - px) * y - (y - py) * x;
if (FPzero(z))
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return HIT_IT;
return FPgt((sgn * z), 0) ? 0 : 2 * sgn;
}
}
static bool
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
plist_same(int npts, Point *p1, Point *p2)
{
int i,
ii,
j;
/* find match for first point */
for (i = 0; i < npts; i++)
{
if ((FPeq(p2[i].x, p1[0].x))
&& (FPeq(p2[i].y, p1[0].y)))
{
/* match found? then look forward through remaining points */
for (ii = 1, j = i + 1; ii < npts; ii++, j++)
{
if (j >= npts)
j = 0;
if ((!FPeq(p2[j].x, p1[ii].x))
|| (!FPeq(p2[j].y, p1[ii].y)))
{
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("plist_same- %d failed forward match with %d\n", j, ii);
#endif
break;
}
}
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("plist_same- ii = %d/%d after forward match\n", ii, npts);
#endif
if (ii == npts)
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return TRUE;
/* match not found forwards? then look backwards */
for (ii = 1, j = i - 1; ii < npts; ii++, j--)
{
if (j < 0)
j = (npts - 1);
if ((!FPeq(p2[j].x, p1[ii].x))
|| (!FPeq(p2[j].y, p1[ii].y)))
{
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("plist_same- %d failed reverse match with %d\n", j, ii);
#endif
break;
}
}
#ifdef GEODEBUG
printf("plist_same- ii = %d/%d after reverse match\n", ii, npts);
#endif
if (ii == npts)
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return TRUE;
}
1997-09-05 20:13:45 +02:00
}
1998-09-01 05:29:17 +02:00
return FALSE;
}