rdelaage
/
postgresql
mirror of https://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
postgresql/src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c

2683 lines
67 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
/**********************************************************************
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
* ruleutils.c - Functions to convert stored expressions/querytrees
* back to source text
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
*
* IDENTIFICATION
Fix optimizer to not try to push WHERE clauses down into a sub-SELECT that has a DISTINCT ON clause, per bug report from Anthony Wood. While at it, improve the DISTINCT-ON-clause recognizer routine to not be fooled by out- of-order DISTINCT lists.
2001-07-31 19:56:31 +02:00
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c,v 1.81 2001/07/31 17:56:31 tgl Exp $
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* This software is copyrighted by Jan Wieck - Hamburg.
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* The author hereby grants permission to use, copy, modify,
* distribute, and license this software and its documentation
* for any purpose, provided that existing copyright notices are
* retained in all copies and that this notice is included
* verbatim in any distributions. No written agreement, license,
* or royalty fee is required for any of the authorized uses.
* Modifications to this software may be copyrighted by their
* author and need not follow the licensing terms described
* here, provided that the new terms are clearly indicated on
* the first page of each file where they apply.
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR DISTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE TO ANY
* PARTY FOR DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR
* CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
* SOFTWARE, ITS DOCUMENTATION, OR ANY DERIVATIVES THEREOF, EVEN
* IF THE AUTHOR HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
* DAMAGE.
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* THE AUTHOR AND DISTRIBUTORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY
* WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED
* WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
* PURPOSE, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ON
* AN "AS IS" BASIS, AND THE AUTHOR AND DISTRIBUTORS HAVE NO
* OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE MAINTENANCE, SUPPORT, UPDATES,
* ENHANCEMENTS, OR MODIFICATIONS.
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
*
**********************************************************************/
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
#include "postgres.h"
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
#include <unistd.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
Partial indexes work again, courtesy of Martijn van Oosterhout. Note: I didn't force an initdb, figuring that one today was enough. However, there is a new function in pg_proc.h, and pg_dump won't be able to dump partial indexes until you add that function.
2001-07-16 07:07:00 +02:00
#include "catalog/heap.h"
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
#include "catalog/pg_index.h"
Rule deparser didn't handle unary operators correctly.
1999-09-02 05:04:04 +02:00
#include "catalog/pg_operator.h"
#include "catalog/pg_shadow.h"
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
#include "commands/view.h"
Rule dumper failed to affix '*' to inheritable RTEs.
1999-10-31 19:57:42 +01:00
#include "executor/spi.h"
#include "lib/stringinfo.h"
#include "optimizer/clauses.h"
#include "optimizer/tlist.h"
Rule deparser needs to quote identifiers that are spelled the same as SQL keywords.
1999-12-06 03:37:17 +01:00
#include "parser/keywords.h"
Change rule dumper to produce reasonable output for casts that assign a specific length or precision, such as foo::char(8). Remove erroneous removal of user-written casts at the top level of a SELECT target item.
2000-02-26 22:13:18 +01:00
#include "parser/parse_expr.h"
Rule dumper failed to affix '*' to inheritable RTEs.
1999-10-31 19:57:42 +01:00
#include "parser/parsetree.h"
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
#include "rewrite/rewriteManip.h"
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
#include "utils/lsyscache.h"
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
/* ----------
* Local data types
* ----------
*/
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
/* Context info needed for invoking a recursive querytree display routine */
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
typedef struct
pgindent run over code.
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
{
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
StringInfo buf; /* output buffer to append to */
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
List *namespaces; /* List of deparse_namespace nodes */
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
bool varprefix; /* TRUE to print prefixes on Vars */
} deparse_context;
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
/*
* Each level of query context around a subtree needs a level of Var namespace.
* The rangetable is the list of actual RTEs, and the namespace indicates
* which parts of the rangetable are accessible (and under what aliases)
* in the expression currently being looked at. A Var having varlevelsup=N
* refers to the N'th item (counting from 0) in the current context's
* namespaces list.
*/
typedef struct
{
List *rtable; /* List of RangeTblEntry nodes */
List *namespace; /* List of joinlist items (RangeTblRef and
* JoinExpr nodes) */
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
} deparse_namespace;
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
/* ----------
* Global data
* ----------
*/
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
static char *rulename = NULL;
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
static void *plan_getrule = NULL;
static char *query_getrule = "SELECT * FROM pg_rewrite WHERE rulename = $1";
static void *plan_getview = NULL;
O.K. - Here's the multibyte aware version of my patch to fix the truncation of the rulename autogenerated during a CREATE VIEW. I've modified all the places in the backend that want to construct the rulename to use the MakeRetrieveViewRuleName(), where I put the #ifdef MULTIBYTE, so that's the only place that knows how to construct a view rulename. Except pg_dump, where I replicated the code, since it's a standalone binary. The only effect the enduser will see is that views with names len(name) > NAMEDATALEN-4 will fail to be created, if the derived rulename clases with an existing rule: i.e. the user is trying to create two views with long names whose first difference is past NAMEDATALEN-4 (but before NAMEDATALEN: that'll error out after the viewname truncation.) In no case will the user get left with a table without a view rule, as the current code does. Ross Reedstrom
2000-09-12 06:15:58 +02:00
static char *query_getview = "SELECT * FROM pg_rewrite WHERE rulename = $1";
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
static void *plan_getam = NULL;
static char *query_getam = "SELECT * FROM pg_am WHERE oid = $1";
static void *plan_getopclass = NULL;
static char *query_getopclass = "SELECT * FROM pg_opclass WHERE oid = $1";
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
/* ----------
* Local functions
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
*
* Most of these functions used to use fixed-size buffers to build their
* results. Now, they take an (already initialized) StringInfo object
* as a parameter, and append their text output to its contents.
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
* ----------
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
static void make_ruledef(StringInfo buf, HeapTuple ruletup, TupleDesc rulettc);
static void make_viewdef(StringInfo buf, HeapTuple ruletup, TupleDesc rulettc);
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
static void get_query_def(Query *query, StringInfo buf, List *parentnamespace);
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
static void get_select_query_def(Query *query, deparse_context *context);
static void get_insert_query_def(Query *query, deparse_context *context);
static void get_update_query_def(Query *query, deparse_context *context);
static void get_delete_query_def(Query *query, deparse_context *context);
Fix breakage of rules using NOTIFY actions, per bug report and patch from sergiop@sinectis.com.ar.
2001-01-03 23:01:05 +01:00
static void get_utility_query_def(Query *query, deparse_context *context);
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
static void get_basic_select_query(Query *query, deparse_context *context);
static void get_setop_query(Node *setOp, Query *query,
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
deparse_context *context, bool toplevel);
Constant expressions that appear in ORDER BY, GROUP BY, DISTINCT ON lists should be reverse-compiled into targetlist index numbers, because that's the only interpretation the parser allows for a constant in these clauses. (Ergo, the only way they could have gotten into the list in the first place is to have come from the targetlist; so this should always work.) Per problem report from Peter E.
2001-04-15 05:14:18 +02:00
static void get_rule_sortgroupclause(SortClause *srt, List *tlist,
bool force_colno,
deparse_context *context);
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
static void get_names_for_var(Var *var, deparse_context *context,
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
char **refname, char **attname);
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
static bool get_alias_for_case(CaseExpr *caseexpr, deparse_context *context,
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
char **refname, char **attname);
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
static bool find_alias_in_namespace(Node *nsnode, Node *expr,
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
List *rangetable, int levelsup,
char **refname, char **attname);
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
static bool phony_equal(Node *expr1, Node *expr2, int levelsup);
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
static void get_rule_expr(Node *node, deparse_context *context);
static void get_func_expr(Expr *expr, deparse_context *context);
static void get_tle_expr(TargetEntry *tle, deparse_context *context);
static void get_const_expr(Const *constval, deparse_context *context);
static void get_sublink_expr(Node *node, deparse_context *context);
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
static void get_from_clause(Query *query, deparse_context *context);
static void get_from_clause_item(Node *jtnode, Query *query,
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
deparse_context *context);
Fix ruleutils to produce correct output for array assignment, such as UPDATE foo SET arr[3] = 42.
2000-08-12 06:04:53 +02:00
static bool tleIsArrayAssign(TargetEntry *tle);
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
static char *quote_identifier(char *ident);
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
static char *get_relation_name(Oid relid);
Make rule lister use aliases from FROM clause when a table column has been given an alias. Otherwise, results are incorrect.
2000-09-18 22:14:23 +02:00
static char *get_relid_attribute_name(Oid relid, AttrNumber attnum);
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Update rule dumper for the brave new world of ONLY.
2000-06-10 07:17:23 +02:00
#define only_marker(rte) ((rte)->inh ? "" : "ONLY ")
Rule dumper failed to affix '*' to inheritable RTEs.
1999-10-31 19:57:42 +01:00
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
/* ----------
* get_ruledef - Do it all and return a text
* that could be used as a statement
* to recreate the rule
* ----------
*/
Functions on 'text' type updated to new fmgr style. 'text' is now TOAST-able.
2000-07-06 07:48:31 +02:00
Datum
pg_get_ruledef(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
{
Functions on 'text' type updated to new fmgr style. 'text' is now TOAST-able.
2000-07-06 07:48:31 +02:00
Name rname = PG_GETARG_NAME(0);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
text *ruledef;
Datum args[1];
char nulls[2];
int spirc;
HeapTuple ruletup;
TupleDesc rulettc;
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
StringInfoData buf;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
int len;
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
O.K. - Here's the multibyte aware version of my patch to fix the truncation of the rulename autogenerated during a CREATE VIEW. I've modified all the places in the backend that want to construct the rulename to use the MakeRetrieveViewRuleName(), where I put the #ifdef MULTIBYTE, so that's the only place that knows how to construct a view rulename. Except pg_dump, where I replicated the code, since it's a standalone binary. The only effect the enduser will see is that views with names len(name) > NAMEDATALEN-4 will fail to be created, if the derived rulename clases with an existing rule: i.e. the user is trying to create two views with long names whose first difference is past NAMEDATALEN-4 (but before NAMEDATALEN: that'll error out after the viewname truncation.) In no case will the user get left with a table without a view rule, as the current code does. Ross Reedstrom
2000-09-12 06:15:58 +02:00
* We need the rules name somewhere deep down: rulename is global
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
*/
New NameStr macro to convert Name to Str. No need for var.data anymore. Fewer calls to nameout. Better use of RelationGetRelationName.
1999-11-08 00:08:36 +01:00
rulename = pstrdup(NameStr(*rname));
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* Connect to SPI manager
*/
if (SPI_connect() != SPI_OK_CONNECT)
elog(ERROR, "get_ruledef: cannot connect to SPI manager");
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
* On the first call prepare the plan to lookup pg_proc. We read
* pg_proc over the SPI manager instead of using the syscache to be
* checked for read access on pg_proc.
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
*/
if (plan_getrule == NULL)
{
Oid argtypes[1];
void *plan;
argtypes[0] = NAMEOID;
plan = SPI_prepare(query_getrule, 1, argtypes);
if (plan == NULL)
elog(ERROR, "SPI_prepare() failed for \"%s\"", query_getrule);
plan_getrule = SPI_saveplan(plan);
}
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* Get the pg_rewrite tuple for this rule
*/
args[0] = PointerGetDatum(rulename);
nulls[0] = (rulename == NULL) ? 'n' : ' ';
nulls[1] = '\0';
spirc = SPI_execp(plan_getrule, args, nulls, 1);
if (spirc != SPI_OK_SELECT)
elog(ERROR, "failed to get pg_rewrite tuple for %s", rulename);
if (SPI_processed != 1)
{
if (SPI_finish() != SPI_OK_FINISH)
elog(ERROR, "get_ruledef: SPI_finish() failed");
Functions on 'text' type updated to new fmgr style. 'text' is now TOAST-able.
2000-07-06 07:48:31 +02:00
ruledef = palloc(VARHDRSZ + 1);
TOAST WARNING: This is actually broken - we have self-deadlocks due to concurrent changes in buffer management. Vadim and me are working on it. Jan
2000-07-04 01:10:14 +02:00
VARATT_SIZEP(ruledef) = VARHDRSZ + 1;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
VARDATA(ruledef)[0] = '-';
Functions on 'text' type updated to new fmgr style. 'text' is now TOAST-able.
2000-07-06 07:48:31 +02:00
PG_RETURN_TEXT_P(ruledef);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
}
ruletup = SPI_tuptable->vals[0];
rulettc = SPI_tuptable->tupdesc;
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* Get the rules definition and put it into executors memory
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
initStringInfo(&buf);
make_ruledef(&buf, ruletup, rulettc);
len = buf.len + VARHDRSZ;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
ruledef = SPI_palloc(len);
TOAST WARNING: This is actually broken - we have self-deadlocks due to concurrent changes in buffer management. Vadim and me are working on it. Jan
2000-07-04 01:10:14 +02:00
VARATT_SIZEP(ruledef) = len;
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
memcpy(VARDATA(ruledef), buf.data, buf.len);
pfree(buf.data);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* Disconnect from SPI manager
*/
if (SPI_finish() != SPI_OK_FINISH)
elog(ERROR, "get_ruledef: SPI_finish() failed");
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* Easy - isn't it?
*/
Functions on 'text' type updated to new fmgr style. 'text' is now TOAST-able.
2000-07-06 07:48:31 +02:00
PG_RETURN_TEXT_P(ruledef);
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
/* ----------
* get_viewdef - Mainly the same thing, but we
* only return the SELECT part of a view
* ----------
*/
Functions on 'text' type updated to new fmgr style. 'text' is now TOAST-able.
2000-07-06 07:48:31 +02:00
Datum
pg_get_viewdef(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
{
O.K. - Here's the multibyte aware version of my patch to fix the truncation of the rulename autogenerated during a CREATE VIEW. I've modified all the places in the backend that want to construct the rulename to use the MakeRetrieveViewRuleName(), where I put the #ifdef MULTIBYTE, so that's the only place that knows how to construct a view rulename. Except pg_dump, where I replicated the code, since it's a standalone binary. The only effect the enduser will see is that views with names len(name) > NAMEDATALEN-4 will fail to be created, if the derived rulename clases with an existing rule: i.e. the user is trying to create two views with long names whose first difference is past NAMEDATALEN-4 (but before NAMEDATALEN: that'll error out after the viewname truncation.) In no case will the user get left with a table without a view rule, as the current code does. Ross Reedstrom
2000-09-12 06:15:58 +02:00
Name vname = PG_GETARG_NAME(0);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
text *ruledef;
O.K. - Here's the multibyte aware version of my patch to fix the truncation of the rulename autogenerated during a CREATE VIEW. I've modified all the places in the backend that want to construct the rulename to use the MakeRetrieveViewRuleName(), where I put the #ifdef MULTIBYTE, so that's the only place that knows how to construct a view rulename. Except pg_dump, where I replicated the code, since it's a standalone binary. The only effect the enduser will see is that views with names len(name) > NAMEDATALEN-4 will fail to be created, if the derived rulename clases with an existing rule: i.e. the user is trying to create two views with long names whose first difference is past NAMEDATALEN-4 (but before NAMEDATALEN: that'll error out after the viewname truncation.) In no case will the user get left with a table without a view rule, as the current code does. Ross Reedstrom
2000-09-12 06:15:58 +02:00
Datum args[1];
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
char nulls[1];
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
int spirc;
HeapTuple ruletup;
TupleDesc rulettc;
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
StringInfoData buf;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
int len;
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
char *name;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
O.K. - Here's the multibyte aware version of my patch to fix the truncation of the rulename autogenerated during a CREATE VIEW. I've modified all the places in the backend that want to construct the rulename to use the MakeRetrieveViewRuleName(), where I put the #ifdef MULTIBYTE, so that's the only place that knows how to construct a view rulename. Except pg_dump, where I replicated the code, since it's a standalone binary. The only effect the enduser will see is that views with names len(name) > NAMEDATALEN-4 will fail to be created, if the derived rulename clases with an existing rule: i.e. the user is trying to create two views with long names whose first difference is past NAMEDATALEN-4 (but before NAMEDATALEN: that'll error out after the viewname truncation.) In no case will the user get left with a table without a view rule, as the current code does. Ross Reedstrom
2000-09-12 06:15:58 +02:00
* We need the view name somewhere deep down
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
*/
O.K. - Here's the multibyte aware version of my patch to fix the truncation of the rulename autogenerated during a CREATE VIEW. I've modified all the places in the backend that want to construct the rulename to use the MakeRetrieveViewRuleName(), where I put the #ifdef MULTIBYTE, so that's the only place that knows how to construct a view rulename. Except pg_dump, where I replicated the code, since it's a standalone binary. The only effect the enduser will see is that views with names len(name) > NAMEDATALEN-4 will fail to be created, if the derived rulename clases with an existing rule: i.e. the user is trying to create two views with long names whose first difference is past NAMEDATALEN-4 (but before NAMEDATALEN: that'll error out after the viewname truncation.) In no case will the user get left with a table without a view rule, as the current code does. Ross Reedstrom
2000-09-12 06:15:58 +02:00
rulename = pstrdup(NameStr(*vname));
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* Connect to SPI manager
*/
if (SPI_connect() != SPI_OK_CONNECT)
elog(ERROR, "get_viewdef: cannot connect to SPI manager");
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
* On the first call prepare the plan to lookup pg_proc. We read
* pg_proc over the SPI manager instead of using the syscache to be
* checked for read access on pg_proc.
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
*/
if (plan_getview == NULL)
{
O.K. - Here's the multibyte aware version of my patch to fix the truncation of the rulename autogenerated during a CREATE VIEW. I've modified all the places in the backend that want to construct the rulename to use the MakeRetrieveViewRuleName(), where I put the #ifdef MULTIBYTE, so that's the only place that knows how to construct a view rulename. Except pg_dump, where I replicated the code, since it's a standalone binary. The only effect the enduser will see is that views with names len(name) > NAMEDATALEN-4 will fail to be created, if the derived rulename clases with an existing rule: i.e. the user is trying to create two views with long names whose first difference is past NAMEDATALEN-4 (but before NAMEDATALEN: that'll error out after the viewname truncation.) In no case will the user get left with a table without a view rule, as the current code does. Ross Reedstrom
2000-09-12 06:15:58 +02:00
Oid argtypes[1];
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
void *plan;
argtypes[0] = NAMEOID;
O.K. - Here's the multibyte aware version of my patch to fix the truncation of the rulename autogenerated during a CREATE VIEW. I've modified all the places in the backend that want to construct the rulename to use the MakeRetrieveViewRuleName(), where I put the #ifdef MULTIBYTE, so that's the only place that knows how to construct a view rulename. Except pg_dump, where I replicated the code, since it's a standalone binary. The only effect the enduser will see is that views with names len(name) > NAMEDATALEN-4 will fail to be created, if the derived rulename clases with an existing rule: i.e. the user is trying to create two views with long names whose first difference is past NAMEDATALEN-4 (but before NAMEDATALEN: that'll error out after the viewname truncation.) In no case will the user get left with a table without a view rule, as the current code does. Ross Reedstrom
2000-09-12 06:15:58 +02:00
plan = SPI_prepare(query_getview, 1, argtypes);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
if (plan == NULL)
elog(ERROR, "SPI_prepare() failed for \"%s\"", query_getview);
plan_getview = SPI_saveplan(plan);
}
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
* Get the pg_rewrite tuple for this rule: rulename is actually
* viewname here
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
*/
O.K. - Here's the multibyte aware version of my patch to fix the truncation of the rulename autogenerated during a CREATE VIEW. I've modified all the places in the backend that want to construct the rulename to use the MakeRetrieveViewRuleName(), where I put the #ifdef MULTIBYTE, so that's the only place that knows how to construct a view rulename. Except pg_dump, where I replicated the code, since it's a standalone binary. The only effect the enduser will see is that views with names len(name) > NAMEDATALEN-4 will fail to be created, if the derived rulename clases with an existing rule: i.e. the user is trying to create two views with long names whose first difference is past NAMEDATALEN-4 (but before NAMEDATALEN: that'll error out after the viewname truncation.) In no case will the user get left with a table without a view rule, as the current code does. Ross Reedstrom
2000-09-12 06:15:58 +02:00
name = MakeRetrieveViewRuleName(rulename);
args[0] = PointerGetDatum(name);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
nulls[0] = ' ';
spirc = SPI_execp(plan_getview, args, nulls, 1);
if (spirc != SPI_OK_SELECT)
elog(ERROR, "failed to get pg_rewrite tuple for view %s", rulename);
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
initStringInfo(&buf);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
if (SPI_processed != 1)
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(&buf, "Not a view");
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
else
{
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* Get the rules definition and put it into executors memory
*/
ruletup = SPI_tuptable->vals[0];
rulettc = SPI_tuptable->tupdesc;
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
make_viewdef(&buf, ruletup, rulettc);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
}
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
len = buf.len + VARHDRSZ;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
ruledef = SPI_palloc(len);
TOAST WARNING: This is actually broken - we have self-deadlocks due to concurrent changes in buffer management. Vadim and me are working on it. Jan
2000-07-04 01:10:14 +02:00
VARATT_SIZEP(ruledef) = len;
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
memcpy(VARDATA(ruledef), buf.data, buf.len);
pfree(buf.data);
O.K. - Here's the multibyte aware version of my patch to fix the truncation of the rulename autogenerated during a CREATE VIEW. I've modified all the places in the backend that want to construct the rulename to use the MakeRetrieveViewRuleName(), where I put the #ifdef MULTIBYTE, so that's the only place that knows how to construct a view rulename. Except pg_dump, where I replicated the code, since it's a standalone binary. The only effect the enduser will see is that views with names len(name) > NAMEDATALEN-4 will fail to be created, if the derived rulename clases with an existing rule: i.e. the user is trying to create two views with long names whose first difference is past NAMEDATALEN-4 (but before NAMEDATALEN: that'll error out after the viewname truncation.) In no case will the user get left with a table without a view rule, as the current code does. Ross Reedstrom
2000-09-12 06:15:58 +02:00
pfree(name);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* Disconnect from SPI manager
*/
if (SPI_finish() != SPI_OK_FINISH)
elog(ERROR, "get_viewdef: SPI_finish() failed");
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* Easy - isn't it?
*/
Functions on 'text' type updated to new fmgr style. 'text' is now TOAST-able.
2000-07-06 07:48:31 +02:00
PG_RETURN_TEXT_P(ruledef);
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
/* ----------
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
* get_indexdef - Get the definition of an index
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
* ----------
*/
Another round of updates for new fmgr, mostly in the datetime code.
2000-06-09 03:11:16 +02:00
Datum
pg_get_indexdef(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
{
Another round of updates for new fmgr, mostly in the datetime code.
2000-06-09 03:11:16 +02:00
Oid indexrelid = PG_GETARG_OID(0);
pgindent run over code.
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
text *indexdef;
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
HeapTuple ht_idx;
HeapTuple ht_idxrel;
HeapTuple ht_indrel;
HeapTuple spi_tup;
TupleDesc spi_ttc;
pgindent run over code.
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
int spi_fno;
Form_pg_index idxrec;
Form_pg_class idxrelrec;
Form_pg_class indrelrec;
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Datum spi_args[1];
char spi_nulls[2];
pgindent run over code.
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
int spirc;
int len;
int keyno;
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
StringInfoData buf;
StringInfoData keybuf;
pgindent run over code.
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
char *sep;
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
* Connect to SPI manager
*/
if (SPI_connect() != SPI_OK_CONNECT)
elog(ERROR, "get_indexdef: cannot connect to SPI manager");
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
* On the first call prepare the plans to lookup pg_am and pg_opclass.
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
*/
if (plan_getam == NULL)
{
Oid argtypes[1];
void *plan;
argtypes[0] = OIDOID;
plan = SPI_prepare(query_getam, 1, argtypes);
if (plan == NULL)
elog(ERROR, "SPI_prepare() failed for \"%s\"", query_getam);
plan_getam = SPI_saveplan(plan);
argtypes[0] = OIDOID;
plan = SPI_prepare(query_getopclass, 1, argtypes);
if (plan == NULL)
elog(ERROR, "SPI_prepare() failed for \"%s\"", query_getopclass);
plan_getopclass = SPI_saveplan(plan);
}
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
* Fetch the pg_index tuple by the Oid of the index
*/
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
ht_idx = SearchSysCache(INDEXRELID,
ObjectIdGetDatum(indexrelid),
0, 0, 0);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
if (!HeapTupleIsValid(ht_idx))
Change error messages to oids come out as %u and not %d. Change has no real affect now.
1999-05-10 02:46:32 +02:00
elog(ERROR, "syscache lookup for index %u failed", indexrelid);
pgindent run over code.
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
idxrec = (Form_pg_index) GETSTRUCT(ht_idx);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
* Fetch the pg_class tuple of the index relation
*/
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
ht_idxrel = SearchSysCache(RELOID,
ObjectIdGetDatum(idxrec->indexrelid),
0, 0, 0);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
if (!HeapTupleIsValid(ht_idxrel))
Change error messages to oids come out as %u and not %d. Change has no real affect now.
1999-05-10 02:46:32 +02:00
elog(ERROR, "syscache lookup for relid %u failed", idxrec->indexrelid);
pgindent run over code.
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
idxrelrec = (Form_pg_class) GETSTRUCT(ht_idxrel);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
* Fetch the pg_class tuple of the indexed relation
*/
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
ht_indrel = SearchSysCache(RELOID,
ObjectIdGetDatum(idxrec->indrelid),
0, 0, 0);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
if (!HeapTupleIsValid(ht_indrel))
Change error messages to oids come out as %u and not %d. Change has no real affect now.
1999-05-10 02:46:32 +02:00
elog(ERROR, "syscache lookup for relid %u failed", idxrec->indrelid);
pgindent run over code.
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
indrelrec = (Form_pg_class) GETSTRUCT(ht_indrel);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
* Get the am name for the index relation
*/
spi_args[0] = ObjectIdGetDatum(idxrelrec->relam);
spi_nulls[0] = ' ';
spi_nulls[1] = '\0';
spirc = SPI_execp(plan_getam, spi_args, spi_nulls, 1);
if (spirc != SPI_OK_SELECT)
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
elog(ERROR, "failed to get pg_am tuple for index %s",
Fixed all elog related warnings, as well as a few others.
2000-01-15 03:59:43 +01:00
NameStr(idxrelrec->relname));
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
if (SPI_processed != 1)
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
elog(ERROR, "failed to get pg_am tuple for index %s",
Fixed all elog related warnings, as well as a few others.
2000-01-15 03:59:43 +01:00
NameStr(idxrelrec->relname));
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
spi_tup = SPI_tuptable->vals[0];
spi_ttc = SPI_tuptable->tupdesc;
spi_fno = SPI_fnumber(spi_ttc, "amname");
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
* Start the index definition
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
initStringInfo(&buf);
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
appendStringInfo(&buf, "CREATE %sINDEX %s ON %s USING %s (",
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
idxrec->indisunique ? "UNIQUE " : "",
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
quote_identifier(pstrdup(NameStr(idxrelrec->relname))),
quote_identifier(pstrdup(NameStr(indrelrec->relname))),
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
quote_identifier(SPI_getvalue(spi_tup, spi_ttc,
spi_fno)));
pgindent run over code.
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
* Collect the indexed attributes
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
initStringInfo(&keybuf);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
sep = "";
for (keyno = 0; keyno < INDEX_MAX_KEYS; keyno++)
{
if (idxrec->indkey[keyno] == InvalidAttrNumber)
break;
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(&keybuf, sep);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
sep = ", ";
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
* Add the indexed field name
*/
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
appendStringInfo(&keybuf, "%s",
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
quote_identifier(get_relid_attribute_name(idxrec->indrelid,
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
idxrec->indkey[keyno])));
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
* If not a functional index, add the operator class name
*/
if (idxrec->indproc == InvalidOid)
{
spi_args[0] = ObjectIdGetDatum(idxrec->indclass[keyno]);
spi_nulls[0] = ' ';
spi_nulls[1] = '\0';
spirc = SPI_execp(plan_getopclass, spi_args, spi_nulls, 1);
if (spirc != SPI_OK_SELECT)
Change error messages to oids come out as %u and not %d. Change has no real affect now.
1999-05-10 02:46:32 +02:00
elog(ERROR, "failed to get pg_opclass tuple %u", idxrec->indclass[keyno]);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
if (SPI_processed != 1)
Change error messages to oids come out as %u and not %d. Change has no real affect now.
1999-05-10 02:46:32 +02:00
elog(ERROR, "failed to get pg_opclass tuple %u", idxrec->indclass[keyno]);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
spi_tup = SPI_tuptable->vals[0];
spi_ttc = SPI_tuptable->tupdesc;
spi_fno = SPI_fnumber(spi_ttc, "opcname");
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
appendStringInfo(&keybuf, " %s",
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
quote_identifier(SPI_getvalue(spi_tup, spi_ttc,
spi_fno)));
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
}
}
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
* For functional index say 'func (attrs) opclass'
*/
if (idxrec->indproc != InvalidOid)
{
HeapTuple proctup;
pgindent run over code.
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
Form_pg_proc procStruct;
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
proctup = SearchSysCache(PROCOID,
ObjectIdGetDatum(idxrec->indproc),
0, 0, 0);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
if (!HeapTupleIsValid(proctup))
Change error messages to oids come out as %u and not %d. Change has no real affect now.
1999-05-10 02:46:32 +02:00
elog(ERROR, "cache lookup for proc %u failed", idxrec->indproc);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
procStruct = (Form_pg_proc) GETSTRUCT(proctup);
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
appendStringInfo(&buf, "%s(%s) ",
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
quote_identifier(pstrdup(NameStr(procStruct->proname))),
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
keybuf.data);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
spi_args[0] = ObjectIdGetDatum(idxrec->indclass[0]);
spi_nulls[0] = ' ';
spi_nulls[1] = '\0';
spirc = SPI_execp(plan_getopclass, spi_args, spi_nulls, 1);
if (spirc != SPI_OK_SELECT)
Change error messages to oids come out as %u and not %d. Change has no real affect now.
1999-05-10 02:46:32 +02:00
elog(ERROR, "failed to get pg_opclass tuple %u", idxrec->indclass[0]);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
if (SPI_processed != 1)
Change error messages to oids come out as %u and not %d. Change has no real affect now.
1999-05-10 02:46:32 +02:00
elog(ERROR, "failed to get pg_opclass tuple %u", idxrec->indclass[0]);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
spi_tup = SPI_tuptable->vals[0];
spi_ttc = SPI_tuptable->tupdesc;
spi_fno = SPI_fnumber(spi_ttc, "opcname");
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
appendStringInfo(&buf, "%s",
quote_identifier(SPI_getvalue(spi_tup, spi_ttc,
spi_fno)));
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
ReleaseSysCache(proctup);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
}
else
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
pgindent run over code.
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
* For the others say 'attr opclass [, ...]'
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(&buf, "%s", keybuf.data);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
* Finish
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(&buf, ")");
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
* Create the result in upper executor memory, and free objects
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
len = buf.len + VARHDRSZ;
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
indexdef = SPI_palloc(len);
TOAST WARNING: This is actually broken - we have self-deadlocks due to concurrent changes in buffer management. Vadim and me are working on it. Jan
2000-07-04 01:10:14 +02:00
VARATT_SIZEP(indexdef) = len;
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
memcpy(VARDATA(indexdef), buf.data, buf.len);
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
pfree(buf.data);
pfree(keybuf.data);
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
ReleaseSysCache(ht_idx);
ReleaseSysCache(ht_idxrel);
ReleaseSysCache(ht_indrel);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
* Disconnect from SPI manager
*/
if (SPI_finish() != SPI_OK_FINISH)
elog(ERROR, "get_viewdef: SPI_finish() failed");
Another round of updates for new fmgr, mostly in the datetime code.
2000-06-09 03:11:16 +02:00
PG_RETURN_TEXT_P(indexdef);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
}
Partial indexes work again, courtesy of Martijn van Oosterhout. Note: I didn't force an initdb, figuring that one today was enough. However, there is a new function in pg_proc.h, and pg_dump won't be able to dump partial indexes until you add that function.
2001-07-16 07:07:00 +02:00
/* ----------
* get_expr - Decompile an expression tree
*
* Input: an expression tree in nodeToString form, and a relation OID
*
* Output: reverse-listed expression
*
* Currently, the expression can only refer to a single relation, namely
* the one specified by the second parameter. This is sufficient for
* partial indexes, column default expressions, etc.
* ----------
*/
Datum
pg_get_expr(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
text *expr = PG_GETARG_TEXT_P(0);
Oid relid = PG_GETARG_OID(1);
text *result;
Node *node;
List *context;
char *exprstr;
char *relname;
char *str;
/* Get the name for the relation */
relname = get_rel_name(relid);
if (relname == NULL)
PG_RETURN_NULL(); /* should we raise an error? */
/* Convert input TEXT object to C string */
exprstr = DatumGetCString(DirectFunctionCall1(textout,
PointerGetDatum(expr)));
/* Convert expression to node tree */
node = (Node *) stringToNode(exprstr);
/*
* If top level is a List, assume it is an implicit-AND structure,
* and convert to explicit AND. This is needed for partial index
* predicates.
*/
if (node && IsA(node, List))
{
node = (Node *) make_ands_explicit((List *) node);
}
/* Deparse */
context = deparse_context_for(relname, relid);
str = deparse_expression(node, context, false);
/* Pass the result back as TEXT */
result = DatumGetTextP(DirectFunctionCall1(textin,
CStringGetDatum(str)));
PG_RETURN_TEXT_P(result);
}
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
/* ----------
* get_userbyid - Get a user name by usesysid and
* fallback to 'unknown (UID=n)'
* ----------
*/
Another batch of fmgr updates. I think I have gotten all old-style functions that take pass-by-value datatypes. Should be ready for port testing ...
2000-06-13 09:35:40 +02:00
Datum
pg_get_userbyid(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
{
Another batch of fmgr updates. I think I have gotten all old-style functions that take pass-by-value datatypes. Should be ready for port testing ...
2000-06-13 09:35:40 +02:00
int32 uid = PG_GETARG_INT32(0);
Name result;
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
HeapTuple usertup;
pgindent run over code.
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
Form_pg_shadow user_rec;
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
* Allocate space for the result
*/
Another batch of fmgr updates. I think I have gotten all old-style functions that take pass-by-value datatypes. Should be ready for port testing ...
2000-06-13 09:35:40 +02:00
result = (Name) palloc(NAMEDATALEN);
New NameStr macro to convert Name to Str. No need for var.data anymore. Fewer calls to nameout. Better use of RelationGetRelationName.
1999-11-08 00:08:36 +01:00
memset(NameStr(*result), 0, NAMEDATALEN);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
* Get the pg_shadow entry and print the result
*/
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
usertup = SearchSysCache(SHADOWSYSID,
ObjectIdGetDatum(uid),
0, 0, 0);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
if (HeapTupleIsValid(usertup))
{
pgindent run over code.
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
user_rec = (Form_pg_shadow) GETSTRUCT(usertup);
New NameStr macro to convert Name to Str. No need for var.data anymore. Fewer calls to nameout. Better use of RelationGetRelationName.
1999-11-08 00:08:36 +01:00
StrNCpy(NameStr(*result), NameStr(user_rec->usename), NAMEDATALEN);
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
ReleaseSysCache(usertup);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
}
else
Another batch of fmgr updates. I think I have gotten all old-style functions that take pass-by-value datatypes. Should be ready for port testing ...
2000-06-13 09:35:40 +02:00
sprintf(NameStr(*result), "unknown (UID=%d)", uid);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Another batch of fmgr updates. I think I have gotten all old-style functions that take pass-by-value datatypes. Should be ready for port testing ...
2000-06-13 09:35:40 +02:00
PG_RETURN_NAME(result);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
}
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
/* ----------
* deparse_expression - General utility for deparsing expressions
*
* expr is the node tree to be deparsed. It must be a transformed expression
* tree (ie, not the raw output of gram.y).
*
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
* dpcontext is a list of deparse_namespace nodes representing the context
* for interpreting Vars in the node tree.
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
*
* forceprefix is TRUE to force all Vars to be prefixed with their table names.
*
* The result is a palloc'd string.
* ----------
*/
char *
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
deparse_expression(Node *expr, List *dpcontext, bool forceprefix)
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
{
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
StringInfoData buf;
deparse_context context;
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
initStringInfo(&buf);
context.buf = &buf;
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
context.namespaces = dpcontext;
context.varprefix = forceprefix;
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
rulename = ""; /* in case of errors */
get_rule_expr(expr, &context);
return buf.data;
}
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
/* ----------
* deparse_context_for - Build deparse context for a single relation
*
* Given the name and OID of a relation, build deparsing context for an
* expression referencing only that relation (as varno 1, varlevelsup 0).
* This is presently sufficient for the external uses of deparse_expression.
* ----------
*/
List *
deparse_context_for(char *relname, Oid relid)
{
deparse_namespace *dpns;
RangeTblEntry *rte;
RangeTblRef *rtr;
dpns = (deparse_namespace *) palloc(sizeof(deparse_namespace));
/* Build a minimal RTE for the rel */
rte = makeNode(RangeTblEntry);
rte->relname = relname;
rte->relid = relid;
rte->eref = makeNode(Attr);
rte->eref->relname = relname;
rte->inh = false;
rte->inFromCl = true;
/* Build one-element rtable */
dpns->rtable = makeList1(rte);
/* Build a namespace list referencing this RTE only */
rtr = makeNode(RangeTblRef);
rtr->rtindex = 1;
dpns->namespace = makeList1(rtr);
/* Return a one-deep namespace stack */
return makeList1(dpns);
}
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
/* ----------
* make_ruledef - reconstruct the CREATE RULE command
* for a given pg_rewrite tuple
* ----------
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
static void
make_ruledef(StringInfo buf, HeapTuple ruletup, TupleDesc rulettc)
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
{
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
char ev_type;
Oid ev_class;
int2 ev_attr;
bool is_instead;
char *ev_qual;
char *ev_action;
List *actions = NIL;
int fno;
bool isnull;
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* Get the attribute values from the rules tuple
*/
fno = SPI_fnumber(rulettc, "ev_type");
ev_type = (char) SPI_getbinval(ruletup, rulettc, fno, &isnull);
fno = SPI_fnumber(rulettc, "ev_class");
ev_class = (Oid) SPI_getbinval(ruletup, rulettc, fno, &isnull);
fno = SPI_fnumber(rulettc, "ev_attr");
ev_attr = (int2) SPI_getbinval(ruletup, rulettc, fno, &isnull);
fno = SPI_fnumber(rulettc, "is_instead");
is_instead = (bool) SPI_getbinval(ruletup, rulettc, fno, &isnull);
fno = SPI_fnumber(rulettc, "ev_qual");
ev_qual = SPI_getvalue(ruletup, rulettc, fno);
fno = SPI_fnumber(rulettc, "ev_action");
ev_action = SPI_getvalue(ruletup, rulettc, fno);
if (ev_action != NULL)
actions = (List *) stringToNode(ev_action);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* Build the rules definition text
*/
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "CREATE RULE %s AS ON ",
quote_identifier(rulename));
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
/* The event the rule is fired for */
switch (ev_type)
{
case '1':
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "SELECT");
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
break;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
case '2':
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "UPDATE");
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
break;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
case '3':
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "INSERT");
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
break;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
case '4':
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "DELETE");
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
break;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
default:
elog(ERROR, "get_ruledef: rule %s has unsupported event type %d",
rulename, ev_type);
break;
}
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
/* The relation the rule is fired on */
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " TO %s",
quote_identifier(get_relation_name(ev_class)));
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
if (ev_attr > 0)
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, ".%s",
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
quote_identifier(get_relid_attribute_name(ev_class,
ev_attr)));
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
/* If the rule has an event qualification, add it */
if (ev_qual == NULL)
ev_qual = "";
Fixed bug in rules event qualification output. Jan
1999-05-25 10:49:33 +02:00
if (strlen(ev_qual) > 0 && strcmp(ev_qual, "<>") != 0)
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
{
Node *qual;
Query *query;
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
deparse_context context;
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
deparse_namespace dpns;
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " WHERE ");
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
qual = stringToNode(ev_qual);
query = (Query *) lfirst(actions);
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
context.buf = buf;
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
context.namespaces = makeList1(&dpns);
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
context.varprefix = (length(query->rtable) != 1);
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
dpns.rtable = query->rtable;
dpns.namespace = query->jointree ? query->jointree->fromlist : NIL;
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr(qual, &context);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
}
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " DO ");
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
/* The INSTEAD keyword (if so) */
if (is_instead)
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "INSTEAD ");
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
/* Finally the rules actions */
if (length(actions) > 1)
{
List *action;
Query *query;
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "(");
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
foreach(action, actions)
{
query = (Query *) lfirst(action);
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_query_def(query, buf, NIL);
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "; ");
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
}
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, ");");
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
else
{
if (length(actions) == 0)
{
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "NOTHING;");
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
}
else
{
Query *query;
query = (Query *) lfirst(actions);
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_query_def(query, buf, NIL);
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, ";");
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
}
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
}
/* ----------
* make_viewdef - reconstruct the SELECT part of a
* view rewrite rule
* ----------
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
static void
make_viewdef(StringInfo buf, HeapTuple ruletup, TupleDesc rulettc)
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
{
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
Query *query;
char ev_type;
Oid ev_class;
int2 ev_attr;
bool is_instead;
char *ev_qual;
char *ev_action;
List *actions = NIL;
int fno;
bool isnull;
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* Get the attribute values from the rules tuple
*/
fno = SPI_fnumber(rulettc, "ev_type");
ev_type = (char) SPI_getbinval(ruletup, rulettc, fno, &isnull);
fno = SPI_fnumber(rulettc, "ev_class");
ev_class = (Oid) SPI_getbinval(ruletup, rulettc, fno, &isnull);
fno = SPI_fnumber(rulettc, "ev_attr");
ev_attr = (int2) SPI_getbinval(ruletup, rulettc, fno, &isnull);
fno = SPI_fnumber(rulettc, "is_instead");
is_instead = (bool) SPI_getbinval(ruletup, rulettc, fno, &isnull);
fno = SPI_fnumber(rulettc, "ev_qual");
ev_qual = SPI_getvalue(ruletup, rulettc, fno);
fno = SPI_fnumber(rulettc, "ev_action");
ev_action = SPI_getvalue(ruletup, rulettc, fno);
if (ev_action != NULL)
actions = (List *) stringToNode(ev_action);
if (length(actions) != 1)
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
{
appendStringInfo(buf, "Not a view");
return;
}
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
query = (Query *) lfirst(actions);
Correct unsafe use of strcmp(). See rant of same date posted to pghackers.
2000-07-07 01:03:37 +02:00
if (ev_type != '1' || ev_attr >= 0 || !is_instead ||
strcmp(ev_qual, "<>") != 0)
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
{
appendStringInfo(buf, "Not a view");
return;
}
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_query_def(query, buf, NIL);
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, ";");
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
/* ----------
* get_query_def - Parse back one action from
* the parsetree in the actions
* list
* ----------
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
static void
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
get_query_def(Query *query, StringInfo buf, List *parentnamespace)
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
{
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
deparse_context context;
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
deparse_namespace dpns;
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
context.buf = buf;
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
context.namespaces = lcons(&dpns, parentnamespace);
context.varprefix = (parentnamespace != NIL ||
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
length(query->rtable) != 1);
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
dpns.rtable = query->rtable;
dpns.namespace = query->jointree ? query->jointree->fromlist : NIL;
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
switch (query->commandType)
{
pgindent run over code.
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
case CMD_SELECT:
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_select_query_def(query, &context);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
break;
case CMD_UPDATE:
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_update_query_def(query, &context);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
break;
case CMD_INSERT:
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_insert_query_def(query, &context);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
break;
case CMD_DELETE:
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_delete_query_def(query, &context);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
break;
case CMD_NOTHING:
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "NOTHING");
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
break;
Fix breakage of rules using NOTIFY actions, per bug report and patch from sergiop@sinectis.com.ar.
2001-01-03 23:01:05 +01:00
case CMD_UTILITY:
get_utility_query_def(query, &context);
break;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
default:
elog(ERROR, "get_ruledef of %s: query command type %d not implemented yet",
rulename, query->commandType);
break;
}
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
/* ----------
* get_select_query_def - Parse back a SELECT parsetree
* ----------
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
static void
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_select_query_def(Query *query, deparse_context *context)
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
{
StringInfo buf = context->buf;
Constant expressions that appear in ORDER BY, GROUP BY, DISTINCT ON lists should be reverse-compiled into targetlist index numbers, because that's the only interpretation the parser allows for a constant in these clauses. (Ergo, the only way they could have gotten into the list in the first place is to have come from the targetlist; so this should always work.) Per problem report from Peter E.
2001-04-15 05:14:18 +02:00
bool force_colno;
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
char *sep;
List *l;
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
* If the Query node has a setOperations tree, then it's the top level
* of a UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT query; only the ORDER BY and LIMIT
* fields are interesting in the top query itself.
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
*/
if (query->setOperations)
{
get_setop_query(query->setOperations, query, context, true);
/* ORDER BY clauses must be simple in this case */
Constant expressions that appear in ORDER BY, GROUP BY, DISTINCT ON lists should be reverse-compiled into targetlist index numbers, because that's the only interpretation the parser allows for a constant in these clauses. (Ergo, the only way they could have gotten into the list in the first place is to have come from the targetlist; so this should always work.) Per problem report from Peter E.
2001-04-15 05:14:18 +02:00
force_colno = true;
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
}
else
{
get_basic_select_query(query, context);
Constant expressions that appear in ORDER BY, GROUP BY, DISTINCT ON lists should be reverse-compiled into targetlist index numbers, because that's the only interpretation the parser allows for a constant in these clauses. (Ergo, the only way they could have gotten into the list in the first place is to have come from the targetlist; so this should always work.) Per problem report from Peter E.
2001-04-15 05:14:18 +02:00
force_colno = false;
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
}
/* Add the ORDER BY clause if given */
if (query->sortClause != NIL)
{
appendStringInfo(buf, " ORDER BY ");
sep = "";
foreach(l, query->sortClause)
{
SortClause *srt = (SortClause *) lfirst(l);
char *opname;
appendStringInfo(buf, sep);
Constant expressions that appear in ORDER BY, GROUP BY, DISTINCT ON lists should be reverse-compiled into targetlist index numbers, because that's the only interpretation the parser allows for a constant in these clauses. (Ergo, the only way they could have gotten into the list in the first place is to have come from the targetlist; so this should always work.) Per problem report from Peter E.
2001-04-15 05:14:18 +02:00
get_rule_sortgroupclause(srt, query->targetList,
force_colno, context);
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
opname = get_opname(srt->sortop);
if (strcmp(opname, "<") != 0)
{
if (strcmp(opname, ">") == 0)
appendStringInfo(buf, " DESC");
else
appendStringInfo(buf, " USING %s", opname);
}
sep = ", ";
}
}
Re-implement LIMIT/OFFSET as a plan node type, instead of a hack in ExecutorRun. This allows LIMIT to work in a view. Also, LIMIT in a cursor declaration will behave in a reasonable fashion, whereas before it was overridden by the FETCH count.
2000-10-26 23:38:24 +02:00
/* Add the LIMIT clause if given */
if (query->limitOffset != NULL)
{
appendStringInfo(buf, " OFFSET ");
get_rule_expr(query->limitOffset, context);
}
if (query->limitCount != NULL)
{
appendStringInfo(buf, " LIMIT ");
Allow ORDER BY, LIMIT in sub-selects. Fix most (not all) cases where the grammar did not allow redundant parentheses around sub-selects. Distinguish LIMIT ALL from LIMIT 0; make the latter behave as one would expect.
2000-11-05 01:15:54 +01:00
if (IsA(query->limitCount, Const) &&
((Const *) query->limitCount)->constisnull)
appendStringInfo(buf, "ALL");
else
get_rule_expr(query->limitCount, context);
Re-implement LIMIT/OFFSET as a plan node type, instead of a hack in ExecutorRun. This allows LIMIT to work in a view. Also, LIMIT in a cursor declaration will behave in a reasonable fashion, whereas before it was overridden by the FETCH count.
2000-10-26 23:38:24 +02:00
}
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
}
static void
get_basic_select_query(Query *query, deparse_context *context)
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
{
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
StringInfo buf = context->buf;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
char *sep;
List *l;
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* Build up the query string - first we say SELECT
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "SELECT");
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
/* Add the DISTINCT clause if given */
if (query->distinctClause != NIL)
{
Fix optimizer to not try to push WHERE clauses down into a sub-SELECT that has a DISTINCT ON clause, per bug report from Anthony Wood. While at it, improve the DISTINCT-ON-clause recognizer routine to not be fooled by out- of-order DISTINCT lists.
2001-07-31 19:56:31 +02:00
if (has_distinct_on_clause(query))
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
{
appendStringInfo(buf, " DISTINCT ON (");
sep = "";
foreach(l, query->distinctClause)
{
SortClause *srt = (SortClause *) lfirst(l);
appendStringInfo(buf, sep);
Constant expressions that appear in ORDER BY, GROUP BY, DISTINCT ON lists should be reverse-compiled into targetlist index numbers, because that's the only interpretation the parser allows for a constant in these clauses. (Ergo, the only way they could have gotten into the list in the first place is to have come from the targetlist; so this should always work.) Per problem report from Peter E.
2001-04-15 05:14:18 +02:00
get_rule_sortgroupclause(srt, query->targetList,
false, context);
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
sep = ", ";
}
appendStringInfo(buf, ")");
}
Fix optimizer to not try to push WHERE clauses down into a sub-SELECT that has a DISTINCT ON clause, per bug report from Anthony Wood. While at it, improve the DISTINCT-ON-clause recognizer routine to not be fooled by out- of-order DISTINCT lists.
2001-07-31 19:56:31 +02:00
else
appendStringInfo(buf, " DISTINCT");
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
}
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
/* Then we tell what to select (the targetlist) */
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
sep = " ";
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
foreach(l, query->targetList)
{
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
TargetEntry *tle = (TargetEntry *) lfirst(l);
Correct unsafe use of strcmp(). See rant of same date posted to pghackers.
2000-07-07 01:03:37 +02:00
bool tell_as = false;
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Subselects in FROM clause, per ISO syntax: FROM (SELECT ...) [AS] alias. (Don't forget that an alias is required.) Views reimplemented as expanding to subselect-in-FROM. Grouping, aggregates, DISTINCT in views actually work now (he says optimistically). No UNION support in subselects/views yet, but I have some ideas about that. Rule-related permissions checking moved out of rewriter and into executor. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-29 20:21:41 +02:00
if (tle->resdom->resjunk)
continue; /* ignore junk entries */
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, sep);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
sep = ", ";
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Change rule dumper to produce reasonable output for casts that assign a specific length or precision, such as foo::char(8). Remove erroneous removal of user-written casts at the top level of a SELECT target item.
2000-02-26 22:13:18 +01:00
/* Do NOT use get_tle_expr here; see its comments! */
get_rule_expr(tle->expr, context);
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
/* Check if we must say AS ... */
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
if (!IsA(tle->expr, Var))
Correct unsafe use of strcmp(). See rant of same date posted to pghackers.
2000-07-07 01:03:37 +02:00
tell_as = (strcmp(tle->resdom->resname, "?column?") != 0);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
else
{
Var *var = (Var *) (tle->expr);
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
char *refname;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
char *attname;
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
get_names_for_var(var, context, &refname, &attname);
Make rule lister do the right thing with Vars representing whole tuples.
2001-04-18 19:04:24 +02:00
tell_as = (attname == NULL ||
strcmp(attname, tle->resdom->resname) != 0);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
}
/* and do if so */
if (tell_as)
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " AS %s",
quote_identifier(tle->resdom->resname));
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
/* Add the FROM clause if needed */
get_from_clause(query, context);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
/* Add the WHERE clause if given */
Subselects in FROM clause, per ISO syntax: FROM (SELECT ...) [AS] alias. (Don't forget that an alias is required.) Views reimplemented as expanding to subselect-in-FROM. Grouping, aggregates, DISTINCT in views actually work now (he says optimistically). No UNION support in subselects/views yet, but I have some ideas about that. Rule-related permissions checking moved out of rewriter and into executor. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-29 20:21:41 +02:00
if (query->jointree->quals != NULL)
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
{
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " WHERE ");
Subselects in FROM clause, per ISO syntax: FROM (SELECT ...) [AS] alias. (Don't forget that an alias is required.) Views reimplemented as expanding to subselect-in-FROM. Grouping, aggregates, DISTINCT in views actually work now (he says optimistically). No UNION support in subselects/views yet, but I have some ideas about that. Rule-related permissions checking moved out of rewriter and into executor. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-29 20:21:41 +02:00
get_rule_expr(query->jointree->quals, context);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
}
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
/* Add the GROUP BY clause if given */
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
if (query->groupClause != NULL)
{
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " GROUP BY ");
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
sep = "";
foreach(l, query->groupClause)
{
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
GroupClause *grp = (GroupClause *) lfirst(l);
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, sep);
Constant expressions that appear in ORDER BY, GROUP BY, DISTINCT ON lists should be reverse-compiled into targetlist index numbers, because that's the only interpretation the parser allows for a constant in these clauses. (Ergo, the only way they could have gotten into the list in the first place is to have come from the targetlist; so this should always work.) Per problem report from Peter E.
2001-04-15 05:14:18 +02:00
get_rule_sortgroupclause(grp, query->targetList,
false, context);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
sep = ", ";
}
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
/* Add the HAVING clause if given */
if (query->havingQual != NULL)
{
appendStringInfo(buf, " HAVING ");
get_rule_expr(query->havingQual, context);
}
}
static void
get_setop_query(Node *setOp, Query *query, deparse_context *context,
bool toplevel)
{
StringInfo buf = context->buf;
if (IsA(setOp, RangeTblRef))
{
RangeTblRef *rtr = (RangeTblRef *) setOp;
RangeTblEntry *rte = rt_fetch(rtr->rtindex, query->rtable);
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
Query *subquery = rte->subquery;
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
Assert(subquery != NULL);
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
get_query_def(subquery, buf, context->namespaces);
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
}
else if (IsA(setOp, SetOperationStmt))
{
SetOperationStmt *op = (SetOperationStmt *) setOp;
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
/*
* Must suppress parens at top level of a setop tree because of
* grammar limitations...
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
*/
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
if (!toplevel)
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "(");
get_setop_query(op->larg, query, context, false);
switch (op->op)
{
case SETOP_UNION:
appendStringInfo(buf, " UNION ");
break;
case SETOP_INTERSECT:
appendStringInfo(buf, " INTERSECT ");
break;
case SETOP_EXCEPT:
appendStringInfo(buf, " EXCEPT ");
break;
default:
elog(ERROR, "get_setop_query: unexpected set op %d",
(int) op->op);
}
if (op->all)
appendStringInfo(buf, "ALL ");
get_setop_query(op->rarg, query, context, false);
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
if (!toplevel)
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, ")");
}
else
{
elog(ERROR, "get_setop_query: unexpected node %d",
(int) nodeTag(setOp));
}
}
Constant expressions that appear in ORDER BY, GROUP BY, DISTINCT ON lists should be reverse-compiled into targetlist index numbers, because that's the only interpretation the parser allows for a constant in these clauses. (Ergo, the only way they could have gotten into the list in the first place is to have come from the targetlist; so this should always work.) Per problem report from Peter E.
2001-04-15 05:14:18 +02:00
/*
* Display a sort/group clause.
*/
static void
get_rule_sortgroupclause(SortClause *srt, List *tlist, bool force_colno,
deparse_context *context)
{
StringInfo buf = context->buf;
TargetEntry *tle;
Node *expr;
tle = get_sortgroupclause_tle(srt, tlist);
expr = tle->expr;
/*
* Use column-number form if requested by caller or if expression is a
* constant --- a constant is ambiguous (and will be misinterpreted
* by findTargetlistEntry()) if we dump it explicitly.
*/
if (force_colno || (expr && IsA(expr, Const)))
{
Assert(!tle->resdom->resjunk);
appendStringInfo(buf, "%d", tle->resdom->resno);
}
else
get_rule_expr(expr, context);
}
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
/* ----------
* get_insert_query_def - Parse back an INSERT parsetree
* ----------
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
static void
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_insert_query_def(Query *query, deparse_context *context)
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
{
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
StringInfo buf = context->buf;
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
RangeTblEntry *select_rte = NULL;
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
RangeTblEntry *rte;
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
char *sep;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
List *l;
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
* If it's an INSERT ... SELECT there will be a single subquery RTE
* for the SELECT.
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
*/
foreach(l, query->rtable)
{
rte = (RangeTblEntry *) lfirst(l);
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
if (rte->subquery == NULL)
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
continue;
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
if (select_rte)
elog(ERROR, "get_insert_query_def: too many RTEs in INSERT!");
select_rte = rte;
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* Start the query with INSERT INTO relname
*/
Rule dumper failed to affix '*' to inheritable RTEs.
1999-10-31 19:57:42 +01:00
rte = rt_fetch(query->resultRelation, query->rtable);
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "INSERT INTO %s",
quote_identifier(rte->relname));
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
/* Add the insert-column-names list */
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
sep = " (";
foreach(l, query->targetList)
{
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
TargetEntry *tle = (TargetEntry *) lfirst(l);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
Subselects in FROM clause, per ISO syntax: FROM (SELECT ...) [AS] alias. (Don't forget that an alias is required.) Views reimplemented as expanding to subselect-in-FROM. Grouping, aggregates, DISTINCT in views actually work now (he says optimistically). No UNION support in subselects/views yet, but I have some ideas about that. Rule-related permissions checking moved out of rewriter and into executor. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-29 20:21:41 +02:00
if (tle->resdom->resjunk)
continue; /* ignore junk entries */
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, sep);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
sep = ", ";
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "%s", quote_identifier(tle->resdom->resname));
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
}
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, ") ");
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
/* Add the VALUES or the SELECT */
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
if (select_rte == NULL)
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
{
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "VALUES (");
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
sep = "";
foreach(l, query->targetList)
{
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
TargetEntry *tle = (TargetEntry *) lfirst(l);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
Subselects in FROM clause, per ISO syntax: FROM (SELECT ...) [AS] alias. (Don't forget that an alias is required.) Views reimplemented as expanding to subselect-in-FROM. Grouping, aggregates, DISTINCT in views actually work now (he says optimistically). No UNION support in subselects/views yet, but I have some ideas about that. Rule-related permissions checking moved out of rewriter and into executor. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-29 20:21:41 +02:00
if (tle->resdom->resjunk)
continue; /* ignore junk entries */
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, sep);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
sep = ", ";
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_tle_expr(tle, context);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
}
Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion. At runtime it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type of the argument. This solves some longstanding problems with dropped type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
2000-02-20 22:32:16 +01:00
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ')');
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
}
else
Reimplementation of UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT. INTERSECT/EXCEPT now meet the SQL92 semantics, including support for ALL option. All three can be used in subqueries and views. DISTINCT and ORDER BY work now in views, too. This rewrite fixes many problems with cross-datatype UNIONs and INSERT/SELECT where the SELECT yields different datatypes than the INSERT needs. I did that by making UNION subqueries and SELECT in INSERT be treated like subselects-in-FROM, thereby allowing an extra level of targetlist where the datatype conversions can be inserted safely. INITDB NEEDED!
2000-10-05 21:11:39 +02:00
get_query_def(select_rte->subquery, buf, NIL);
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
/* ----------
* get_update_query_def - Parse back an UPDATE parsetree
* ----------
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
static void
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_update_query_def(Query *query, deparse_context *context)
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
{
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
StringInfo buf = context->buf;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
char *sep;
RangeTblEntry *rte;
List *l;
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* Start the query with UPDATE relname SET
*/
Rule dumper failed to affix '*' to inheritable RTEs.
1999-10-31 19:57:42 +01:00
rte = rt_fetch(query->resultRelation, query->rtable);
appendStringInfo(buf, "UPDATE %s%s SET ",
Update rule dumper for the brave new world of ONLY.
2000-06-10 07:17:23 +02:00
only_marker(rte),
quote_identifier(rte->relname));
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
/* Add the comma separated list of 'attname = value' */
sep = "";
foreach(l, query->targetList)
{
Subselects in FROM clause, per ISO syntax: FROM (SELECT ...) [AS] alias. (Don't forget that an alias is required.) Views reimplemented as expanding to subselect-in-FROM. Grouping, aggregates, DISTINCT in views actually work now (he says optimistically). No UNION support in subselects/views yet, but I have some ideas about that. Rule-related permissions checking moved out of rewriter and into executor. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-29 20:21:41 +02:00
TargetEntry *tle = (TargetEntry *) lfirst(l);
if (tle->resdom->resjunk)
continue; /* ignore junk entries */
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, sep);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
sep = ", ";
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
Fix ruleutils to produce correct output for array assignment, such as UPDATE foo SET arr[3] = 42.
2000-08-12 06:04:53 +02:00
/*
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
* If the update expression is an array assignment, we mustn't put
* out "attname =" here; it will come out of the display of the
* ArrayRef node instead.
Fix ruleutils to produce correct output for array assignment, such as UPDATE foo SET arr[3] = 42.
2000-08-12 06:04:53 +02:00
*/
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
if (!tleIsArrayAssign(tle))
Fix ruleutils to produce correct output for array assignment, such as UPDATE foo SET arr[3] = 42.
2000-08-12 06:04:53 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "%s = ",
quote_identifier(tle->resdom->resname));
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_tle_expr(tle, context);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
}
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
/* Add the FROM clause if needed */
get_from_clause(query, context);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
/* Finally add a WHERE clause if given */
Subselects in FROM clause, per ISO syntax: FROM (SELECT ...) [AS] alias. (Don't forget that an alias is required.) Views reimplemented as expanding to subselect-in-FROM. Grouping, aggregates, DISTINCT in views actually work now (he says optimistically). No UNION support in subselects/views yet, but I have some ideas about that. Rule-related permissions checking moved out of rewriter and into executor. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-29 20:21:41 +02:00
if (query->jointree->quals != NULL)
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
{
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " WHERE ");
Subselects in FROM clause, per ISO syntax: FROM (SELECT ...) [AS] alias. (Don't forget that an alias is required.) Views reimplemented as expanding to subselect-in-FROM. Grouping, aggregates, DISTINCT in views actually work now (he says optimistically). No UNION support in subselects/views yet, but I have some ideas about that. Rule-related permissions checking moved out of rewriter and into executor. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-29 20:21:41 +02:00
get_rule_expr(query->jointree->quals, context);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
}
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
/* ----------
* get_delete_query_def - Parse back a DELETE parsetree
* ----------
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
static void
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_delete_query_def(Query *query, deparse_context *context)
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
{
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
StringInfo buf = context->buf;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
RangeTblEntry *rte;
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* Start the query with DELETE FROM relname
*/
Rule dumper failed to affix '*' to inheritable RTEs.
1999-10-31 19:57:42 +01:00
rte = rt_fetch(query->resultRelation, query->rtable);
appendStringInfo(buf, "DELETE FROM %s%s",
Update rule dumper for the brave new world of ONLY.
2000-06-10 07:17:23 +02:00
only_marker(rte),
quote_identifier(rte->relname));
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
/* Add a WHERE clause if given */
Subselects in FROM clause, per ISO syntax: FROM (SELECT ...) [AS] alias. (Don't forget that an alias is required.) Views reimplemented as expanding to subselect-in-FROM. Grouping, aggregates, DISTINCT in views actually work now (he says optimistically). No UNION support in subselects/views yet, but I have some ideas about that. Rule-related permissions checking moved out of rewriter and into executor. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-29 20:21:41 +02:00
if (query->jointree->quals != NULL)
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
{
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " WHERE ");
Subselects in FROM clause, per ISO syntax: FROM (SELECT ...) [AS] alias. (Don't forget that an alias is required.) Views reimplemented as expanding to subselect-in-FROM. Grouping, aggregates, DISTINCT in views actually work now (he says optimistically). No UNION support in subselects/views yet, but I have some ideas about that. Rule-related permissions checking moved out of rewriter and into executor. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-29 20:21:41 +02:00
get_rule_expr(query->jointree->quals, context);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
}
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
Fix breakage of rules using NOTIFY actions, per bug report and patch from sergiop@sinectis.com.ar.
2001-01-03 23:01:05 +01:00
/* ----------
* get_utility_query_def - Parse back a UTILITY parsetree
* ----------
*/
static void
get_utility_query_def(Query *query, deparse_context *context)
{
StringInfo buf = context->buf;
if (query->utilityStmt && IsA(query->utilityStmt, NotifyStmt))
{
NotifyStmt *stmt = (NotifyStmt *) query->utilityStmt;
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
Fix breakage of rules using NOTIFY actions, per bug report and patch from sergiop@sinectis.com.ar.
2001-01-03 23:01:05 +01:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "NOTIFY %s", quote_identifier(stmt->relname));
}
else
elog(ERROR, "get_utility_query_def: unexpected statement type");
}
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
/*
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
* Get the relation refname and attname for a (possibly nonlocal) Var.
*
Make rule lister do the right thing with Vars representing whole tuples.
2001-04-18 19:04:24 +02:00
* attname will be returned as NULL if the Var represents a whole tuple
* of the relation.
*
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
* This is trickier than it ought to be because of the possibility of aliases
* and limited scope of refnames. We have to try to return the correct alias
* with respect to the current namespace given by the context.
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
*/
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
static void
get_names_for_var(Var *var, deparse_context *context,
char **refname, char **attname)
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
{
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
List *nslist = context->namespaces;
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
int sup = var->varlevelsup;
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
deparse_namespace *dpns;
RangeTblEntry *rte;
/* Find appropriate nesting depth */
while (sup-- > 0 && nslist != NIL)
nslist = lnext(nslist);
if (nslist == NIL)
elog(ERROR, "get_names_for_var: bogus varlevelsup %d",
var->varlevelsup);
dpns = (deparse_namespace *) lfirst(nslist);
/* Scan namespace to see if we can find an alias for the var */
if (find_alias_in_namespace((Node *) dpns->namespace, (Node *) var,
dpns->rtable, var->varlevelsup,
refname, attname))
return;
/*
* Otherwise, fall back on the rangetable entry. This should happen
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
* only for uses of special RTEs like *NEW* and *OLD*, which won't get
* placed in our namespace.
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
*/
rte = rt_fetch(var->varno, dpns->rtable);
*refname = rte->eref->relname;
Make rule lister do the right thing with Vars representing whole tuples.
2001-04-18 19:04:24 +02:00
if (var->varattno == InvalidAttrNumber)
*attname = NULL;
else
*attname = get_rte_attribute_name(rte, var->varattno);
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
}
/*
* Check to see if a CASE expression matches a FULL JOIN's output expression.
* If so, return the refname and alias it should be expressed as.
*/
static bool
get_alias_for_case(CaseExpr *caseexpr, deparse_context *context,
char **refname, char **attname)
{
List *nslist;
int sup;
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
/*
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
* This could be done more efficiently if we first groveled through
* the CASE to find varlevelsup values, but it's probably not worth
* the trouble. All this code will go away someday anyway ...
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
*/
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
sup = 0;
foreach(nslist, context->namespaces)
{
deparse_namespace *dpns = (deparse_namespace *) lfirst(nslist);
if (find_alias_in_namespace((Node *) dpns->namespace,
(Node *) caseexpr,
dpns->rtable, sup,
refname, attname))
return true;
sup++;
}
return false;
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
}
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
/*
* Recursively scan a namespace (same representation as a jointree) to see
* if we can find an alias for the given expression. If so, return the
* correct alias refname and attname. The expression may be either a plain
* Var or a CASE expression (which may be a FULL JOIN reference).
*/
static bool
find_alias_in_namespace(Node *nsnode, Node *expr,
List *rangetable, int levelsup,
char **refname, char **attname)
{
if (nsnode == NULL)
return false;
if (IsA(nsnode, RangeTblRef))
{
if (IsA(expr, Var))
{
Var *var = (Var *) expr;
int rtindex = ((RangeTblRef *) nsnode)->rtindex;
if (var->varno == rtindex && var->varlevelsup == levelsup)
{
RangeTblEntry *rte = rt_fetch(rtindex, rangetable);
*refname = rte->eref->relname;
Make rule lister do the right thing with Vars representing whole tuples.
2001-04-18 19:04:24 +02:00
if (var->varattno == InvalidAttrNumber)
*attname = NULL;
else
*attname = get_rte_attribute_name(rte, var->varattno);
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
return true;
}
}
}
else if (IsA(nsnode, JoinExpr))
{
JoinExpr *j = (JoinExpr *) nsnode;
if (j->alias)
{
List *vlist;
List *nlist;
/*
* Does the expr match any of the output columns of the join?
*
* We can't just use equal() here, because the given expr may
* have nonzero levelsup, whereas the saved expression in the
* JoinExpr should have zero levelsup.
*/
nlist = j->colnames;
foreach(vlist, j->colvars)
{
if (phony_equal(lfirst(vlist), expr, levelsup))
{
*refname = j->alias->relname;
*attname = strVal(lfirst(nlist));
return true;
}
nlist = lnext(nlist);
}
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
/*
* Tables within an aliased join are invisible from outside
* the join, according to the scope rules of SQL92 (the join
* is considered a subquery). So, stop here.
*/
return false;
}
if (find_alias_in_namespace(j->larg, expr,
rangetable, levelsup,
refname, attname))
return true;
if (find_alias_in_namespace(j->rarg, expr,
rangetable, levelsup,
refname, attname))
return true;
}
else if (IsA(nsnode, List))
{
List *l;
foreach(l, (List *) nsnode)
{
if (find_alias_in_namespace(lfirst(l), expr,
rangetable, levelsup,
refname, attname))
return true;
}
}
else
elog(ERROR, "find_alias_in_namespace: unexpected node type %d",
nodeTag(nsnode));
return false;
}
/*
* Check for equality of two expressions, with the proviso that all Vars in
* expr1 should have varlevelsup = 0, while all Vars in expr2 should have
* varlevelsup = levelsup.
*
* In reality we only need to support equality checks on Vars and the type
* of CASE expression that is used for FULL JOIN outputs, so not all node
* types need be handled here.
*
* Otherwise, this code is a straight ripoff from equalfuncs.c.
*/
static bool
phony_equal(Node *expr1, Node *expr2, int levelsup)
{
if (expr1 == NULL || expr2 == NULL)
return (expr1 == expr2);
if (nodeTag(expr1) != nodeTag(expr2))
return false;
if (IsA(expr1, Var))
{
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
Var *a = (Var *) expr1;
Var *b = (Var *) expr2;
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
if (a->varno != b->varno)
return false;
if (a->varattno != b->varattno)
return false;
if (a->vartype != b->vartype)
return false;
if (a->vartypmod != b->vartypmod)
return false;
if (a->varlevelsup != 0 || b->varlevelsup != levelsup)
return false;
if (a->varnoold != b->varnoold)
return false;
if (a->varoattno != b->varoattno)
return false;
return true;
}
if (IsA(expr1, CaseExpr))
{
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
CaseExpr *a = (CaseExpr *) expr1;
CaseExpr *b = (CaseExpr *) expr2;
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
if (a->casetype != b->casetype)
return false;
if (!phony_equal(a->arg, b->arg, levelsup))
return false;
if (!phony_equal((Node *) a->args, (Node *) b->args, levelsup))
return false;
if (!phony_equal(a->defresult, b->defresult, levelsup))
return false;
return true;
}
if (IsA(expr1, CaseWhen))
{
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
CaseWhen *a = (CaseWhen *) expr1;
CaseWhen *b = (CaseWhen *) expr2;
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
if (!phony_equal(a->expr, b->expr, levelsup))
return false;
if (!phony_equal(a->result, b->result, levelsup))
return false;
return true;
}
if (IsA(expr1, Expr))
{
Expr *a = (Expr *) expr1;
Expr *b = (Expr *) expr2;
if (a->opType != b->opType)
return false;
if (!phony_equal(a->oper, b->oper, levelsup))
return false;
if (!phony_equal((Node *) a->args, (Node *) b->args, levelsup))
return false;
return true;
}
if (IsA(expr1, Func))
{
Func *a = (Func *) expr1;
Func *b = (Func *) expr2;
if (a->funcid != b->funcid)
return false;
if (a->functype != b->functype)
return false;
return true;
}
if (IsA(expr1, List))
{
List *la = (List *) expr1;
List *lb = (List *) expr2;
List *l;
if (length(la) != length(lb))
return false;
foreach(l, la)
{
if (!phony_equal(lfirst(l), lfirst(lb), levelsup))
return false;
lb = lnext(lb);
}
return true;
}
/* If we get here, there was something weird in a JOIN's colvars list */
elog(ERROR, "phony_equal: unexpected node type %d", nodeTag(expr1));
return false;
}
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
/* ----------
* get_rule_expr - Parse back an expression
* ----------
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
static void
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr(Node *node, deparse_context *context)
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
{
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
StringInfo buf = context->buf;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
if (node == NULL)
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
return;
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
* Each level of get_rule_expr must emit an indivisible term
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
* (parenthesized if necessary) to ensure result is reparsed into the
* same expression tree.
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
*
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
* There might be some work left here to support additional node types.
* Can we ever see Param nodes here?
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
*/
switch (nodeTag(node))
{
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
case T_Const:
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_const_expr((Const *) node, context);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
break;
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
case T_Var:
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
{
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
Var *var = (Var *) node;
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
char *refname;
char *attname;
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
get_names_for_var(var, context, &refname, &attname);
Make rule lister do the right thing with Vars representing whole tuples.
2001-04-18 19:04:24 +02:00
if (context->varprefix || attname == NULL)
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
{
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
if (strcmp(refname, "*NEW*") == 0)
Make rule lister do the right thing with Vars representing whole tuples.
2001-04-18 19:04:24 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "new");
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
else if (strcmp(refname, "*OLD*") == 0)
Make rule lister do the right thing with Vars representing whole tuples.
2001-04-18 19:04:24 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "old");
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
else
Make rule lister do the right thing with Vars representing whole tuples.
2001-04-18 19:04:24 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "%s",
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
quote_identifier(refname));
Make rule lister do the right thing with Vars representing whole tuples.
2001-04-18 19:04:24 +02:00
if (attname)
appendStringInfoChar(buf, '.');
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
}
Make rule lister do the right thing with Vars representing whole tuples.
2001-04-18 19:04:24 +02:00
if (attname)
appendStringInfo(buf, "%s", quote_identifier(attname));
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
}
break;
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
case T_Expr:
{
Expr *expr = (Expr *) node;
Rule deparser didn't handle unary operators correctly.
1999-09-02 05:04:04 +02:00
List *args = expr->args;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
Remove dashes in comments that don't need them, rewrap with pgindent.
2001-03-22 07:16:21 +01:00
/*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* Expr nodes have to be handled a bit detailed
*/
switch (expr->opType)
{
case OP_EXPR:
Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion. At runtime it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type of the argument. This solves some longstanding problems with dropped type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
2000-02-20 22:32:16 +01:00
appendStringInfoChar(buf, '(');
Rule deparser didn't handle unary operators correctly.
1999-09-02 05:04:04 +02:00
if (length(args) == 2)
{
/* binary operator */
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr((Node *) lfirst(args), context);
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " %s ",
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
get_opname(((Oper *) expr->oper)->opno));
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr((Node *) lsecond(args), context);
Rule deparser didn't handle unary operators correctly.
1999-09-02 05:04:04 +02:00
}
else
{
/* unary operator --- but which side? */
Oid opno = ((Oper *) expr->oper)->opno;
HeapTuple tp;
Form_pg_operator optup;
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
tp = SearchSysCache(OPEROID,
ObjectIdGetDatum(opno),
0, 0, 0);
if (!HeapTupleIsValid(tp))
elog(ERROR, "cache lookup for operator %u failed", opno);
Rule deparser didn't handle unary operators correctly.
1999-09-02 05:04:04 +02:00
optup = (Form_pg_operator) GETSTRUCT(tp);
switch (optup->oprkind)
{
case 'l':
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "%s ",
get_opname(opno));
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr((Node *) lfirst(args),
context);
Rule deparser didn't handle unary operators correctly.
1999-09-02 05:04:04 +02:00
break;
case 'r':
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr((Node *) lfirst(args),
context);
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " %s",
get_opname(opno));
Rule deparser didn't handle unary operators correctly.
1999-09-02 05:04:04 +02:00
break;
default:
elog(ERROR, "get_rule_expr: bogus oprkind");
}
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
ReleaseSysCache(tp);
Rule deparser didn't handle unary operators correctly.
1999-09-02 05:04:04 +02:00
}
Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion. At runtime it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type of the argument. This solves some longstanding problems with dropped type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
2000-02-20 22:32:16 +01:00
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ')');
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
break;
case OR_EXPR:
Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion. At runtime it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type of the argument. This solves some longstanding problems with dropped type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
2000-02-20 22:32:16 +01:00
appendStringInfoChar(buf, '(');
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr((Node *) lfirst(args), context);
Rule deparser didn't handle unary operators correctly.
1999-09-02 05:04:04 +02:00
while ((args = lnext(args)) != NIL)
{
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " OR ");
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr((Node *) lfirst(args), context);
Rule deparser didn't handle unary operators correctly.
1999-09-02 05:04:04 +02:00
}
Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion. At runtime it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type of the argument. This solves some longstanding problems with dropped type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
2000-02-20 22:32:16 +01:00
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ')');
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
break;
case AND_EXPR:
Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion. At runtime it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type of the argument. This solves some longstanding problems with dropped type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
2000-02-20 22:32:16 +01:00
appendStringInfoChar(buf, '(');
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr((Node *) lfirst(args), context);
Rule deparser didn't handle unary operators correctly.
1999-09-02 05:04:04 +02:00
while ((args = lnext(args)) != NIL)
{
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " AND ");
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr((Node *) lfirst(args), context);
Rule deparser didn't handle unary operators correctly.
1999-09-02 05:04:04 +02:00
}
Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion. At runtime it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type of the argument. This solves some longstanding problems with dropped type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
2000-02-20 22:32:16 +01:00
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ')');
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
break;
case NOT_EXPR:
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "(NOT ");
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr((Node *) lfirst(args), context);
Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion. At runtime it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type of the argument. This solves some longstanding problems with dropped type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
2000-02-20 22:32:16 +01:00
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ')');
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
break;
case FUNC_EXPR:
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_func_expr((Expr *) node, context);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
break;
default:
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
elog(ERROR, "get_rule_expr: expr opType %d not supported",
expr->opType);
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
}
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
break;
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
case T_Aggref:
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
{
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
Aggref *aggref = (Aggref *) node;
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
aggregate(DISTINCT ...) works, per SQL spec. Note this forces initdb because of change of Aggref node in stored rules.
1999-12-13 02:27:21 +01:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "%s(%s",
quote_identifier(aggref->aggname),
aggref->aggdistinct ? "DISTINCT " : "");
if (aggref->aggstar)
appendStringInfo(buf, "*");
else
get_rule_expr(aggref->target, context);
Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion. At runtime it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type of the argument. This solves some longstanding problems with dropped type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
2000-02-20 22:32:16 +01:00
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ')');
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
}
break;
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
case T_Iter:
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr(((Iter *) node)->iterexpr, context);
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
break;
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
case T_ArrayRef:
{
ArrayRef *aref = (ArrayRef *) node;
Fix ruleutils to produce correct output for array assignment, such as UPDATE foo SET arr[3] = 42.
2000-08-12 06:04:53 +02:00
bool savevarprefix = context->varprefix;
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
List *lowlist;
List *uplist;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
Fix ruleutils to produce correct output for array assignment, such as UPDATE foo SET arr[3] = 42.
2000-08-12 06:04:53 +02:00
/*
* If we are doing UPDATE array[n] = expr, we need to
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
* suppress any prefix on the array name. Currently, that
* is the only context in which we will see a non-null
* refassgnexpr --- but someday a smarter test may be
* needed.
Fix ruleutils to produce correct output for array assignment, such as UPDATE foo SET arr[3] = 42.
2000-08-12 06:04:53 +02:00
*/
if (aref->refassgnexpr)
context->varprefix = false;
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr(aref->refexpr, context);
Fix ruleutils to produce correct output for array assignment, such as UPDATE foo SET arr[3] = 42.
2000-08-12 06:04:53 +02:00
context->varprefix = savevarprefix;
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
lowlist = aref->reflowerindexpr;
foreach(uplist, aref->refupperindexpr)
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
{
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "[");
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
if (lowlist)
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
{
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr((Node *) lfirst(lowlist), context);
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, ":");
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
lowlist = lnext(lowlist);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
}
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr((Node *) lfirst(uplist), context);
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "]");
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
}
Fix ruleutils to produce correct output for array assignment, such as UPDATE foo SET arr[3] = 42.
2000-08-12 06:04:53 +02:00
if (aref->refassgnexpr)
{
appendStringInfo(buf, " = ");
get_rule_expr(aref->refassgnexpr, context);
}
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
}
break;
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Remove 'func_tlist' from Func expression nodes, likewise 'param_tlist' from Param nodes, per discussion a few days ago on pghackers. Add new expression node type FieldSelect that implements the functionality where it's actually needed. Clean up some other unused fields in Func nodes as well. NOTE: initdb forced due to change in stored expression trees for rules.
2000-08-08 17:43:12 +02:00
case T_FieldSelect:
{
FieldSelect *fselect = (FieldSelect *) node;
HeapTuple typetup;
Form_pg_type typeStruct;
Oid typrelid;
char *fieldname;
/* we do NOT parenthesize the arg expression, for now */
get_rule_expr(fselect->arg, context);
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
typetup = SearchSysCache(TYPEOID,
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
ObjectIdGetDatum(exprType(fselect->arg)),
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
0, 0, 0);
Remove 'func_tlist' from Func expression nodes, likewise 'param_tlist' from Param nodes, per discussion a few days ago on pghackers. Add new expression node type FieldSelect that implements the functionality where it's actually needed. Clean up some other unused fields in Func nodes as well. NOTE: initdb forced due to change in stored expression trees for rules.
2000-08-08 17:43:12 +02:00
if (!HeapTupleIsValid(typetup))
elog(ERROR, "cache lookup of type %u failed",
exprType(fselect->arg));
typeStruct = (Form_pg_type) GETSTRUCT(typetup);
typrelid = typeStruct->typrelid;
if (!OidIsValid(typrelid))
elog(ERROR, "Argument type %s of FieldSelect is not a tuple type",
NameStr(typeStruct->typname));
Make rule lister use aliases from FROM clause when a table column has been given an alias. Otherwise, results are incorrect.
2000-09-18 22:14:23 +02:00
fieldname = get_relid_attribute_name(typrelid,
fselect->fieldnum);
Remove 'func_tlist' from Func expression nodes, likewise 'param_tlist' from Param nodes, per discussion a few days ago on pghackers. Add new expression node type FieldSelect that implements the functionality where it's actually needed. Clean up some other unused fields in Func nodes as well. NOTE: initdb forced due to change in stored expression trees for rules.
2000-08-08 17:43:12 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, ".%s", quote_identifier(fieldname));
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
ReleaseSysCache(typetup);
Remove 'func_tlist' from Func expression nodes, likewise 'param_tlist' from Param nodes, per discussion a few days ago on pghackers. Add new expression node type FieldSelect that implements the functionality where it's actually needed. Clean up some other unused fields in Func nodes as well. NOTE: initdb forced due to change in stored expression trees for rules.
2000-08-08 17:43:12 +02:00
}
break;
Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion. At runtime it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type of the argument. This solves some longstanding problems with dropped type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
2000-02-20 22:32:16 +01:00
case T_RelabelType:
{
RelabelType *relabel = (RelabelType *) node;
HeapTuple typetup;
Form_pg_type typeStruct;
char *extval;
appendStringInfoChar(buf, '(');
get_rule_expr(relabel->arg, context);
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
typetup = SearchSysCache(TYPEOID,
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
ObjectIdGetDatum(relabel->resulttype),
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
0, 0, 0);
Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion. At runtime it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type of the argument. This solves some longstanding problems with dropped type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
2000-02-20 22:32:16 +01:00
if (!HeapTupleIsValid(typetup))
elog(ERROR, "cache lookup of type %u failed",
relabel->resulttype);
typeStruct = (Form_pg_type) GETSTRUCT(typetup);
extval = pstrdup(NameStr(typeStruct->typname));
appendStringInfo(buf, ")::%s", quote_identifier(extval));
pfree(extval);
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
ReleaseSysCache(typetup);
Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion. At runtime it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type of the argument. This solves some longstanding problems with dropped type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
2000-02-20 22:32:16 +01:00
}
break;
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
case T_CaseExpr:
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
{
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
CaseExpr *caseexpr = (CaseExpr *) node;
List *temp;
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
char *refname;
char *attname;
/* Hack for providing aliases for FULL JOIN outputs */
if (get_alias_for_case(caseexpr, context,
&refname, &attname))
{
if (context->varprefix)
appendStringInfo(buf, "%s.",
quote_identifier(refname));
appendStringInfo(buf, "%s", quote_identifier(attname));
break;
}
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "CASE");
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
foreach(temp, caseexpr->args)
{
CaseWhen *when = (CaseWhen *) lfirst(temp);
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " WHEN ");
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr(when->expr, context);
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " THEN ");
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr(when->result, context);
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
}
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " ELSE ");
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr(caseexpr->defresult, context);
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " END");
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
break;
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Add IS UNKNOWN, IS NOT UNKNOWN boolean tests, fix the existing boolean tests to return the correct results per SQL9x when given NULL inputs. Reimplement these tests as well as IS [NOT] NULL to have their own expression node types, instead of depending on special functions. From Joe Conway, with a little help from Tom Lane.
2001-06-20 00:39:12 +02:00
case T_NullTest:
{
NullTest *ntest = (NullTest *) node;
Remove unnecessarily enthusiastic parenthesizing in reverse-listing of IS NULL, IS TRUE, and friends (my fault...)
2001-07-10 02:02:02 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "(");
Add IS UNKNOWN, IS NOT UNKNOWN boolean tests, fix the existing boolean tests to return the correct results per SQL9x when given NULL inputs. Reimplement these tests as well as IS [NOT] NULL to have their own expression node types, instead of depending on special functions. From Joe Conway, with a little help from Tom Lane.
2001-06-20 00:39:12 +02:00
get_rule_expr(ntest->arg, context);
switch (ntest->nulltesttype)
{
case IS_NULL:
Remove unnecessarily enthusiastic parenthesizing in reverse-listing of IS NULL, IS TRUE, and friends (my fault...)
2001-07-10 02:02:02 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " IS NULL)");
Add IS UNKNOWN, IS NOT UNKNOWN boolean tests, fix the existing boolean tests to return the correct results per SQL9x when given NULL inputs. Reimplement these tests as well as IS [NOT] NULL to have their own expression node types, instead of depending on special functions. From Joe Conway, with a little help from Tom Lane.
2001-06-20 00:39:12 +02:00
break;
case IS_NOT_NULL:
Remove unnecessarily enthusiastic parenthesizing in reverse-listing of IS NULL, IS TRUE, and friends (my fault...)
2001-07-10 02:02:02 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " IS NOT NULL)");
Add IS UNKNOWN, IS NOT UNKNOWN boolean tests, fix the existing boolean tests to return the correct results per SQL9x when given NULL inputs. Reimplement these tests as well as IS [NOT] NULL to have their own expression node types, instead of depending on special functions. From Joe Conway, with a little help from Tom Lane.
2001-06-20 00:39:12 +02:00
break;
default:
elog(ERROR, "get_rule_expr: unexpected nulltesttype %d",
(int) ntest->nulltesttype);
}
}
break;
case T_BooleanTest:
{
BooleanTest *btest = (BooleanTest *) node;
Remove unnecessarily enthusiastic parenthesizing in reverse-listing of IS NULL, IS TRUE, and friends (my fault...)
2001-07-10 02:02:02 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "(");
Add IS UNKNOWN, IS NOT UNKNOWN boolean tests, fix the existing boolean tests to return the correct results per SQL9x when given NULL inputs. Reimplement these tests as well as IS [NOT] NULL to have their own expression node types, instead of depending on special functions. From Joe Conway, with a little help from Tom Lane.
2001-06-20 00:39:12 +02:00
get_rule_expr(btest->arg, context);
switch (btest->booltesttype)
{
case IS_TRUE:
Remove unnecessarily enthusiastic parenthesizing in reverse-listing of IS NULL, IS TRUE, and friends (my fault...)
2001-07-10 02:02:02 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " IS TRUE)");
Add IS UNKNOWN, IS NOT UNKNOWN boolean tests, fix the existing boolean tests to return the correct results per SQL9x when given NULL inputs. Reimplement these tests as well as IS [NOT] NULL to have their own expression node types, instead of depending on special functions. From Joe Conway, with a little help from Tom Lane.
2001-06-20 00:39:12 +02:00
break;
case IS_NOT_TRUE:
Remove unnecessarily enthusiastic parenthesizing in reverse-listing of IS NULL, IS TRUE, and friends (my fault...)
2001-07-10 02:02:02 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " IS NOT TRUE)");
Add IS UNKNOWN, IS NOT UNKNOWN boolean tests, fix the existing boolean tests to return the correct results per SQL9x when given NULL inputs. Reimplement these tests as well as IS [NOT] NULL to have their own expression node types, instead of depending on special functions. From Joe Conway, with a little help from Tom Lane.
2001-06-20 00:39:12 +02:00
break;
case IS_FALSE:
Remove unnecessarily enthusiastic parenthesizing in reverse-listing of IS NULL, IS TRUE, and friends (my fault...)
2001-07-10 02:02:02 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " IS FALSE)");
Add IS UNKNOWN, IS NOT UNKNOWN boolean tests, fix the existing boolean tests to return the correct results per SQL9x when given NULL inputs. Reimplement these tests as well as IS [NOT] NULL to have their own expression node types, instead of depending on special functions. From Joe Conway, with a little help from Tom Lane.
2001-06-20 00:39:12 +02:00
break;
case IS_NOT_FALSE:
Remove unnecessarily enthusiastic parenthesizing in reverse-listing of IS NULL, IS TRUE, and friends (my fault...)
2001-07-10 02:02:02 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " IS NOT FALSE)");
Add IS UNKNOWN, IS NOT UNKNOWN boolean tests, fix the existing boolean tests to return the correct results per SQL9x when given NULL inputs. Reimplement these tests as well as IS [NOT] NULL to have their own expression node types, instead of depending on special functions. From Joe Conway, with a little help from Tom Lane.
2001-06-20 00:39:12 +02:00
break;
case IS_UNKNOWN:
Remove unnecessarily enthusiastic parenthesizing in reverse-listing of IS NULL, IS TRUE, and friends (my fault...)
2001-07-10 02:02:02 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " IS UNKNOWN)");
Add IS UNKNOWN, IS NOT UNKNOWN boolean tests, fix the existing boolean tests to return the correct results per SQL9x when given NULL inputs. Reimplement these tests as well as IS [NOT] NULL to have their own expression node types, instead of depending on special functions. From Joe Conway, with a little help from Tom Lane.
2001-06-20 00:39:12 +02:00
break;
case IS_NOT_UNKNOWN:
Remove unnecessarily enthusiastic parenthesizing in reverse-listing of IS NULL, IS TRUE, and friends (my fault...)
2001-07-10 02:02:02 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " IS NOT UNKNOWN)");
Add IS UNKNOWN, IS NOT UNKNOWN boolean tests, fix the existing boolean tests to return the correct results per SQL9x when given NULL inputs. Reimplement these tests as well as IS [NOT] NULL to have their own expression node types, instead of depending on special functions. From Joe Conway, with a little help from Tom Lane.
2001-06-20 00:39:12 +02:00
break;
default:
elog(ERROR, "get_rule_expr: unexpected booltesttype %d",
(int) btest->booltesttype);
}
}
break;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
case T_SubLink:
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_sublink_expr(node, context);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
break;
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
default:
printf("\n%s\n", nodeToString(node));
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
elog(ERROR, "get_ruledef of %s: unknown node type %d in get_rule_expr()",
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
rulename, nodeTag(node));
break;
}
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
/* ----------
* get_func_expr - Parse back a Func node
* ----------
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
static void
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_func_expr(Expr *expr, deparse_context *context)
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
{
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
StringInfo buf = context->buf;
Change rule dumper to produce reasonable output for casts that assign a specific length or precision, such as foo::char(8). Remove erroneous removal of user-written casts at the top level of a SELECT target item.
2000-02-26 22:13:18 +01:00
Func *func = (Func *) (expr->oper);
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
Oid funcoid = func->funcid;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
HeapTuple proctup;
Form_pg_proc procStruct;
Change rule dumper to produce reasonable output for casts that assign a specific length or precision, such as foo::char(8). Remove erroneous removal of user-written casts at the top level of a SELECT target item.
2000-02-26 22:13:18 +01:00
char *proname;
int32 coercedTypmod;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
List *l;
char *sep;
Change rule dumper to produce reasonable output for casts that assign a specific length or precision, such as foo::char(8). Remove erroneous removal of user-written casts at the top level of a SELECT target item.
2000-02-26 22:13:18 +01:00
/*
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
* Get the functions pg_proc tuple
*/
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
proctup = SearchSysCache(PROCOID,
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
ObjectIdGetDatum(funcoid),
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
0, 0, 0);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
if (!HeapTupleIsValid(proctup))
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
elog(ERROR, "cache lookup for proc %u failed", funcoid);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
procStruct = (Form_pg_proc) GETSTRUCT(proctup);
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
proname = NameStr(procStruct->proname);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
Change rule dumper to produce reasonable output for casts that assign a specific length or precision, such as foo::char(8). Remove erroneous removal of user-written casts at the top level of a SELECT target item.
2000-02-26 22:13:18 +01:00
/*
* Check to see if function is a length-coercion function for some
* datatype. If so, display the operation as a type cast.
*/
if (exprIsLengthCoercion((Node *) expr, &coercedTypmod))
{
Node *arg = lfirst(expr->args);
/*
* Strip off any RelabelType on the input, so we don't print
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
* redundancies like x::bpchar::char(8).
*
* XXX Are there any cases where this is a bad idea?
Change rule dumper to produce reasonable output for casts that assign a specific length or precision, such as foo::char(8). Remove erroneous removal of user-written casts at the top level of a SELECT target item.
2000-02-26 22:13:18 +01:00
*/
if (IsA(arg, RelabelType))
arg = ((RelabelType *) arg)->arg;
appendStringInfoChar(buf, '(');
get_rule_expr(arg, context);
appendStringInfo(buf, ")::");
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
Change rule dumper to produce reasonable output for casts that assign a specific length or precision, such as foo::char(8). Remove erroneous removal of user-written casts at the top level of a SELECT target item.
2000-02-26 22:13:18 +01:00
/*
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
* Show typename with appropriate length decoration. Note that
* since exprIsLengthCoercion succeeded, the function name is the
* same as its output type name.
Change rule dumper to produce reasonable output for casts that assign a specific length or precision, such as foo::char(8). Remove erroneous removal of user-written casts at the top level of a SELECT target item.
2000-02-26 22:13:18 +01:00
*/
if (strcmp(proname, "bpchar") == 0)
{
Fix a bunch of minor portability problems and maybe-bugs revealed by running gcc and HP's cc with warnings cranked way up. Signed vs unsigned comparisons, routines declared static and then defined not-static, that kind of thing. Tedious, but perhaps useful...
2000-03-17 03:36:41 +01:00
if (coercedTypmod > (int32) VARHDRSZ)
Change rule dumper to produce reasonable output for casts that assign a specific length or precision, such as foo::char(8). Remove erroneous removal of user-written casts at the top level of a SELECT target item.
2000-02-26 22:13:18 +01:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "char(%d)", coercedTypmod - VARHDRSZ);
else
appendStringInfo(buf, "char");
}
else if (strcmp(proname, "varchar") == 0)
{
Fix a bunch of minor portability problems and maybe-bugs revealed by running gcc and HP's cc with warnings cranked way up. Signed vs unsigned comparisons, routines declared static and then defined not-static, that kind of thing. Tedious, but perhaps useful...
2000-03-17 03:36:41 +01:00
if (coercedTypmod > (int32) VARHDRSZ)
Change rule dumper to produce reasonable output for casts that assign a specific length or precision, such as foo::char(8). Remove erroneous removal of user-written casts at the top level of a SELECT target item.
2000-02-26 22:13:18 +01:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "varchar(%d)", coercedTypmod - VARHDRSZ);
else
appendStringInfo(buf, "varchar");
}
else if (strcmp(proname, "numeric") == 0)
{
Fix a bunch of minor portability problems and maybe-bugs revealed by running gcc and HP's cc with warnings cranked way up. Signed vs unsigned comparisons, routines declared static and then defined not-static, that kind of thing. Tedious, but perhaps useful...
2000-03-17 03:36:41 +01:00
if (coercedTypmod >= (int32) VARHDRSZ)
Change rule dumper to produce reasonable output for casts that assign a specific length or precision, such as foo::char(8). Remove erroneous removal of user-written casts at the top level of a SELECT target item.
2000-02-26 22:13:18 +01:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "numeric(%d,%d)",
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
((coercedTypmod - VARHDRSZ) >> 16) & 0xffff,
Change rule dumper to produce reasonable output for casts that assign a specific length or precision, such as foo::char(8). Remove erroneous removal of user-written casts at the top level of a SELECT target item.
2000-02-26 22:13:18 +01:00
(coercedTypmod - VARHDRSZ) & 0xffff);
else
appendStringInfo(buf, "numeric");
}
else
appendStringInfo(buf, "%s", quote_identifier(proname));
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
ReleaseSysCache(proctup);
Change rule dumper to produce reasonable output for casts that assign a specific length or precision, such as foo::char(8). Remove erroneous removal of user-written casts at the top level of a SELECT target item.
2000-02-26 22:13:18 +01:00
return;
}
/*
* Normal function: display as proname(args)
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
*/
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "%s(", quote_identifier(proname));
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
sep = "";
foreach(l, expr->args)
{
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, sep);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
sep = ", ";
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr((Node *) lfirst(l), context);
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion. At runtime it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type of the argument. This solves some longstanding problems with dropped type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
2000-02-20 22:32:16 +01:00
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ')');
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
ReleaseSysCache(proctup);
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
/* ----------
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
* get_tle_expr
*
Change rule dumper to produce reasonable output for casts that assign a specific length or precision, such as foo::char(8). Remove erroneous removal of user-written casts at the top level of a SELECT target item.
2000-02-26 22:13:18 +01:00
* In an INSERT or UPDATE targetlist item, the parser may have inserted
* a length-coercion function call to coerce the value to the right
* length for the target column. We want to suppress the output of
* that function call, otherwise dump/reload/dump... would blow up the
* expression by adding more and more layers of length-coercion calls.
*
* As of 7.0, this hack is no longer absolutely essential, because the parser
* is now smart enough not to add a redundant length coercion function call.
* But we still suppress the function call just for neatness of displayed
* rules.
*
* Note that this hack must NOT be applied to SELECT targetlist items;
* any length coercion appearing there is something the user actually wrote.
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
* ----------
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
static void
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_tle_expr(TargetEntry *tle, deparse_context *context)
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
{
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
Expr *expr = (Expr *) (tle->expr);
Change rule dumper to produce reasonable output for casts that assign a specific length or precision, such as foo::char(8). Remove erroneous removal of user-written casts at the top level of a SELECT target item.
2000-02-26 22:13:18 +01:00
int32 coercedTypmod;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
/*
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
* If top level is a length coercion to the correct length, suppress
* it; else dump the expression normally.
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
*/
Change rule dumper to produce reasonable output for casts that assign a specific length or precision, such as foo::char(8). Remove erroneous removal of user-written casts at the top level of a SELECT target item.
2000-02-26 22:13:18 +01:00
if (tle->resdom->restypmod >= 0 &&
exprIsLengthCoercion((Node *) expr, &coercedTypmod) &&
coercedTypmod == tle->resdom->restypmod)
get_rule_expr((Node *) lfirst(expr->args), context);
else
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr(tle->expr, context);
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
/* ----------
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
* get_const_expr
*
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
* Make a string representation of a Const
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
* ----------
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
static void
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_const_expr(Const *constval, deparse_context *context)
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
{
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
StringInfo buf = context->buf;
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
HeapTuple typetup;
Form_pg_type typeStruct;
char *extval;
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
char *valptr;
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
typetup = SearchSysCache(TYPEOID,
ObjectIdGetDatum(constval->consttype),
0, 0, 0);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
if (!HeapTupleIsValid(typetup))
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
elog(ERROR, "cache lookup of type %u failed", constval->consttype);
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
typeStruct = (Form_pg_type) GETSTRUCT(typetup);
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Clean up handling of explicit NULL constants. Cases like SELECT null::text; SELECT int4fac(null); work as expected now. In some cases a NULL must be surrounded by parentheses: SELECT 2 + null; fails SELECT 2 + (null); OK This is a grammatical ambiguity that seems difficult to avoid. Other than that, NULLs seem to behave about like you'd expect. The internal implementation is that NULL constants are typed as UNKNOWN (like untyped string constants) until the parser can deduce the right type.
1999-12-24 07:43:34 +01:00
if (constval->constisnull)
{
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
Clean up handling of explicit NULL constants. Cases like SELECT null::text; SELECT int4fac(null); work as expected now. In some cases a NULL must be surrounded by parentheses: SELECT 2 + null; fails SELECT 2 + (null); OK This is a grammatical ambiguity that seems difficult to avoid. Other than that, NULLs seem to behave about like you'd expect. The internal implementation is that NULL constants are typed as UNKNOWN (like untyped string constants) until the parser can deduce the right type.
1999-12-24 07:43:34 +01:00
/*
* Always label the type of a NULL constant. This not only
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
* prevents misdecisions about the type, but it ensures that our
* output is a valid b_expr.
Clean up handling of explicit NULL constants. Cases like SELECT null::text; SELECT int4fac(null); work as expected now. In some cases a NULL must be surrounded by parentheses: SELECT 2 + null; fails SELECT 2 + (null); OK This is a grammatical ambiguity that seems difficult to avoid. Other than that, NULLs seem to behave about like you'd expect. The internal implementation is that NULL constants are typed as UNKNOWN (like untyped string constants) until the parser can deduce the right type.
1999-12-24 07:43:34 +01:00
*/
extval = pstrdup(NameStr(typeStruct->typname));
appendStringInfo(buf, "NULL::%s", quote_identifier(extval));
pfree(extval);
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
ReleaseSysCache(typetup);
Clean up handling of explicit NULL constants. Cases like SELECT null::text; SELECT int4fac(null); work as expected now. In some cases a NULL must be surrounded by parentheses: SELECT 2 + null; fails SELECT 2 + (null); OK This is a grammatical ambiguity that seems difficult to avoid. Other than that, NULLs seem to behave about like you'd expect. The internal implementation is that NULL constants are typed as UNKNOWN (like untyped string constants) until the parser can deduce the right type.
1999-12-24 07:43:34 +01:00
return;
}
Third round of fmgr updates: eliminate calls using fmgr() and fmgr_faddr() in favor of new-style calls. Lots of cleanup of sloppy casts to use XXXGetDatum and DatumGetXXX ...
2000-05-30 06:25:00 +02:00
extval = DatumGetCString(OidFunctionCall3(typeStruct->typoutput,
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
constval->constvalue,
ObjectIdGetDatum(typeStruct->typelem),
Int32GetDatum(-1)));
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
switch (constval->consttype)
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
{
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
case INT2OID:
case INT4OID:
case OIDOID: /* int types */
case FLOAT4OID:
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
case FLOAT8OID: /* float types */
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
/* These types are printed without quotes */
appendStringInfo(buf, extval);
break;
default:
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
/*
* We must quote any funny characters in the constant's
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
* representation. XXX Any MULTIBYTE considerations here?
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
*/
appendStringInfoChar(buf, '\'');
for (valptr = extval; *valptr; valptr++)
{
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
char ch = *valptr;
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
if (ch == '\'' || ch == '\\')
{
appendStringInfoChar(buf, '\\');
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ch);
}
Suppress 'comparison-is-always-true' warning on machines where char is signed by default.
2000-11-18 05:40:18 +01:00
else if (((unsigned char) ch) < ((unsigned char) ' '))
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "\\%03o", (int) ch);
else
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ch);
}
appendStringInfoChar(buf, '\'');
break;
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
}
pfree(extval);
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
switch (constval->consttype)
{
case INT4OID:
case FLOAT8OID:
case UNKNOWNOID:
/* These types can be left unlabeled */
break;
default:
New NameStr macro to convert Name to Str. No need for var.data anymore. Fewer calls to nameout. Better use of RelationGetRelationName.
1999-11-08 00:08:36 +01:00
extval = pstrdup(NameStr(typeStruct->typname));
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "::%s", quote_identifier(extval));
pfree(extval);
break;
}
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
ReleaseSysCache(typetup);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
}
/* ----------
* get_sublink_expr - Parse back a sublink
* ----------
*/
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
static void
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_sublink_expr(Node *node, deparse_context *context)
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
{
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
StringInfo buf = context->buf;
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
SubLink *sublink = (SubLink *) node;
Query *query = (Query *) (sublink->subselect);
List *l;
char *sep;
Implement subselects in target lists. Also, relax requirement that subselects can only appear on the righthand side of a binary operator. That's still true for quantified predicates like x = ANY (SELECT ...), but a subselect that delivers a single result can now appear anywhere in an expression. This is implemented by changing EXPR_SUBLINK sublinks to represent just the (SELECT ...) expression, without any 'left hand side' or combining operator --- so they're now more like EXISTS_SUBLINK. To handle the case of '(x, y, z) = (SELECT ...)', I added a new sublink type MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK, which acts just like EXPR_SUBLINK used to. But the grammar will only generate one for a multiple-left-hand-side row expression.
1999-11-15 03:00:15 +01:00
Oper *oper;
bool need_paren;
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion. At runtime it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type of the argument. This solves some longstanding problems with dropped type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
2000-02-20 22:32:16 +01:00
appendStringInfoChar(buf, '(');
Fix several problems in rule deparsing: didn't handle array references or CASE expressions, didn't parenthesize complex expressions properly. Also, always output variable references as fully qualified names to eliminate ambiguity bug recently reported. (This could be smarter, but reliability comes first.)
1999-08-28 05:59:05 +02:00
Implement subselects in target lists. Also, relax requirement that subselects can only appear on the righthand side of a binary operator. That's still true for quantified predicates like x = ANY (SELECT ...), but a subselect that delivers a single result can now appear anywhere in an expression. This is implemented by changing EXPR_SUBLINK sublinks to represent just the (SELECT ...) expression, without any 'left hand side' or combining operator --- so they're now more like EXISTS_SUBLINK. To handle the case of '(x, y, z) = (SELECT ...)', I added a new sublink type MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK, which acts just like EXPR_SUBLINK used to. But the grammar will only generate one for a multiple-left-hand-side row expression.
1999-11-15 03:00:15 +01:00
if (sublink->lefthand != NIL)
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
{
Implement subselects in target lists. Also, relax requirement that subselects can only appear on the righthand side of a binary operator. That's still true for quantified predicates like x = ANY (SELECT ...), but a subselect that delivers a single result can now appear anywhere in an expression. This is implemented by changing EXPR_SUBLINK sublinks to represent just the (SELECT ...) expression, without any 'left hand side' or combining operator --- so they're now more like EXISTS_SUBLINK. To handle the case of '(x, y, z) = (SELECT ...)', I added a new sublink type MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK, which acts just like EXPR_SUBLINK used to. But the grammar will only generate one for a multiple-left-hand-side row expression.
1999-11-15 03:00:15 +01:00
need_paren = (length(sublink->lefthand) > 1);
if (need_paren)
Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion. At runtime it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type of the argument. This solves some longstanding problems with dropped type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
2000-02-20 22:32:16 +01:00
appendStringInfoChar(buf, '(');
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
sep = "";
foreach(l, sublink->lefthand)
{
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, sep);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
sep = ", ";
Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint expressions in CREATE TABLE. There is no longer an emasculated expression syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr. Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now). Also, stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is actually used. This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way people usually expect it to. BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value. I didn't actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
1999-10-04 01:55:40 +02:00
get_rule_expr((Node *) lfirst(l), context);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
}
Implement subselects in target lists. Also, relax requirement that subselects can only appear on the righthand side of a binary operator. That's still true for quantified predicates like x = ANY (SELECT ...), but a subselect that delivers a single result can now appear anywhere in an expression. This is implemented by changing EXPR_SUBLINK sublinks to represent just the (SELECT ...) expression, without any 'left hand side' or combining operator --- so they're now more like EXISTS_SUBLINK. To handle the case of '(x, y, z) = (SELECT ...)', I added a new sublink type MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK, which acts just like EXPR_SUBLINK used to. But the grammar will only generate one for a multiple-left-hand-side row expression.
1999-11-15 03:00:15 +01:00
if (need_paren)
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, ") ");
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
else
Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion. At runtime it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type of the argument. This solves some longstanding problems with dropped type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
2000-02-20 22:32:16 +01:00
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ' ');
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
}
Implement subselects in target lists. Also, relax requirement that subselects can only appear on the righthand side of a binary operator. That's still true for quantified predicates like x = ANY (SELECT ...), but a subselect that delivers a single result can now appear anywhere in an expression. This is implemented by changing EXPR_SUBLINK sublinks to represent just the (SELECT ...) expression, without any 'left hand side' or combining operator --- so they're now more like EXISTS_SUBLINK. To handle the case of '(x, y, z) = (SELECT ...)', I added a new sublink type MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK, which acts just like EXPR_SUBLINK used to. But the grammar will only generate one for a multiple-left-hand-side row expression.
1999-11-15 03:00:15 +01:00
need_paren = true;
pgindent run over code.
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
switch (sublink->subLinkType)
{
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
case EXISTS_SUBLINK:
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "EXISTS ");
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
break;
case ANY_SUBLINK:
Revise implementation of SubLinks so that there is a consistent, documented intepretation of the lefthand and oper fields. Fix a number of obscure problems while at it --- for example, the old code failed if the parser decided to insert a type-coercion function just below the operator of a SubLink. CAUTION: this will break stored rules that contain subplans. You may need to initdb.
1999-08-26 01:21:43 +02:00
oper = (Oper *) lfirst(sublink->oper);
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "%s ANY ", get_opname(oper->opno));
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
break;
case ALL_SUBLINK:
Revise implementation of SubLinks so that there is a consistent, documented intepretation of the lefthand and oper fields. Fix a number of obscure problems while at it --- for example, the old code failed if the parser decided to insert a type-coercion function just below the operator of a SubLink. CAUTION: this will break stored rules that contain subplans. You may need to initdb.
1999-08-26 01:21:43 +02:00
oper = (Oper *) lfirst(sublink->oper);
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "%s ALL ", get_opname(oper->opno));
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
break;
Implement subselects in target lists. Also, relax requirement that subselects can only appear on the righthand side of a binary operator. That's still true for quantified predicates like x = ANY (SELECT ...), but a subselect that delivers a single result can now appear anywhere in an expression. This is implemented by changing EXPR_SUBLINK sublinks to represent just the (SELECT ...) expression, without any 'left hand side' or combining operator --- so they're now more like EXISTS_SUBLINK. To handle the case of '(x, y, z) = (SELECT ...)', I added a new sublink type MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK, which acts just like EXPR_SUBLINK used to. But the grammar will only generate one for a multiple-left-hand-side row expression.
1999-11-15 03:00:15 +01:00
case MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK:
Revise implementation of SubLinks so that there is a consistent, documented intepretation of the lefthand and oper fields. Fix a number of obscure problems while at it --- for example, the old code failed if the parser decided to insert a type-coercion function just below the operator of a SubLink. CAUTION: this will break stored rules that contain subplans. You may need to initdb.
1999-08-26 01:21:43 +02:00
oper = (Oper *) lfirst(sublink->oper);
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "%s ", get_opname(oper->opno));
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
break;
Implement subselects in target lists. Also, relax requirement that subselects can only appear on the righthand side of a binary operator. That's still true for quantified predicates like x = ANY (SELECT ...), but a subselect that delivers a single result can now appear anywhere in an expression. This is implemented by changing EXPR_SUBLINK sublinks to represent just the (SELECT ...) expression, without any 'left hand side' or combining operator --- so they're now more like EXISTS_SUBLINK. To handle the case of '(x, y, z) = (SELECT ...)', I added a new sublink type MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK, which acts just like EXPR_SUBLINK used to. But the grammar will only generate one for a multiple-left-hand-side row expression.
1999-11-15 03:00:15 +01:00
case EXPR_SUBLINK:
need_paren = false;
break;
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
default:
Revise rule-printing routines to use expandable StringInfo buffers, so that they have no hardwired limit on the length of a rule's text. Fix a couple of minor bugs in passing --- deparsed UPDATE queries didn't have quotes around relation name, and quotes and backslashes in constant values weren't backslash-quoted.
1999-10-02 03:08:05 +02:00
elog(ERROR, "get_sublink_expr: unsupported sublink type %d",
pgindent run over code.
1999-05-25 18:15:34 +02:00
sublink->subLinkType);
Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects, view aggregate columns, insert into select from view, updates with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to view definition. Updates for rule/view backparsing utility functions to handle subselects correct. New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you can see the complete index definition in the latter one). Enabling array references on query parameters. Bugfix for functional index. Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views. The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer. But another stopper is that I don't know if the latest changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it compile on AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave. Jan
1998-10-02 18:28:04 +02:00
break;
}
Implement subselects in target lists. Also, relax requirement that subselects can only appear on the righthand side of a binary operator. That's still true for quantified predicates like x = ANY (SELECT ...), but a subselect that delivers a single result can now appear anywhere in an expression. This is implemented by changing EXPR_SUBLINK sublinks to represent just the (SELECT ...) expression, without any 'left hand side' or combining operator --- so they're now more like EXISTS_SUBLINK. To handle the case of '(x, y, z) = (SELECT ...)', I added a new sublink type MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK, which acts just like EXPR_SUBLINK used to. But the grammar will only generate one for a multiple-left-hand-side row expression.
1999-11-15 03:00:15 +01:00
if (need_paren)
Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion. At runtime it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type of the argument. This solves some longstanding problems with dropped type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
2000-02-20 22:32:16 +01:00
appendStringInfoChar(buf, '(');
Implement subselects in target lists. Also, relax requirement that subselects can only appear on the righthand side of a binary operator. That's still true for quantified predicates like x = ANY (SELECT ...), but a subselect that delivers a single result can now appear anywhere in an expression. This is implemented by changing EXPR_SUBLINK sublinks to represent just the (SELECT ...) expression, without any 'left hand side' or combining operator --- so they're now more like EXISTS_SUBLINK. To handle the case of '(x, y, z) = (SELECT ...)', I added a new sublink type MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK, which acts just like EXPR_SUBLINK used to. But the grammar will only generate one for a multiple-left-hand-side row expression.
1999-11-15 03:00:15 +01:00
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
get_query_def(query, buf, context->namespaces);
Implement subselects in target lists. Also, relax requirement that subselects can only appear on the righthand side of a binary operator. That's still true for quantified predicates like x = ANY (SELECT ...), but a subselect that delivers a single result can now appear anywhere in an expression. This is implemented by changing EXPR_SUBLINK sublinks to represent just the (SELECT ...) expression, without any 'left hand side' or combining operator --- so they're now more like EXISTS_SUBLINK. To handle the case of '(x, y, z) = (SELECT ...)', I added a new sublink type MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK, which acts just like EXPR_SUBLINK used to. But the grammar will only generate one for a multiple-left-hand-side row expression.
1999-11-15 03:00:15 +01:00
if (need_paren)
appendStringInfo(buf, "))");
else
Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion. At runtime it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type of the argument. This solves some longstanding problems with dropped type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
2000-02-20 22:32:16 +01:00
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ')');
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
/* ----------
* get_from_clause - Parse back a FROM clause
* ----------
*/
static void
get_from_clause(Query *query, deparse_context *context)
{
StringInfo buf = context->buf;
char *sep;
List *l;
/*
* We use the query's jointree as a guide to what to print. However,
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
* we must ignore auto-added RTEs that are marked not inFromCl. (These
* can only appear at the top level of the jointree, so it's
* sufficient to check here.) Also ignore the rule pseudo-RTEs for NEW
* and OLD.
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
*/
sep = " FROM ";
Subselects in FROM clause, per ISO syntax: FROM (SELECT ...) [AS] alias. (Don't forget that an alias is required.) Views reimplemented as expanding to subselect-in-FROM. Grouping, aggregates, DISTINCT in views actually work now (he says optimistically). No UNION support in subselects/views yet, but I have some ideas about that. Rule-related permissions checking moved out of rewriter and into executor. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-29 20:21:41 +02:00
foreach(l, query->jointree->fromlist)
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
{
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
Node *jtnode = (Node *) lfirst(l);
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
if (IsA(jtnode, RangeTblRef))
{
int varno = ((RangeTblRef *) jtnode)->rtindex;
RangeTblEntry *rte = rt_fetch(varno, query->rtable);
if (!rte->inFromCl)
continue;
if (strcmp(rte->eref->relname, "*NEW*") == 0)
continue;
if (strcmp(rte->eref->relname, "*OLD*") == 0)
continue;
}
appendStringInfo(buf, sep);
get_from_clause_item(jtnode, query, context);
sep = ", ";
}
}
static void
get_from_clause_item(Node *jtnode, Query *query, deparse_context *context)
{
StringInfo buf = context->buf;
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
deparse_namespace *dpns;
List *sv_namespace;
/*
* FROM-clause items have limited visibility of query's namespace.
* Save and restore the outer namespace setting while we munge it.
*/
dpns = (deparse_namespace *) lfirst(context->namespaces);
sv_namespace = dpns->namespace;
dpns->namespace = NIL;
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
if (IsA(jtnode, RangeTblRef))
{
int varno = ((RangeTblRef *) jtnode)->rtindex;
RangeTblEntry *rte = rt_fetch(varno, query->rtable);
Subselects in FROM clause, per ISO syntax: FROM (SELECT ...) [AS] alias. (Don't forget that an alias is required.) Views reimplemented as expanding to subselect-in-FROM. Grouping, aggregates, DISTINCT in views actually work now (he says optimistically). No UNION support in subselects/views yet, but I have some ideas about that. Rule-related permissions checking moved out of rewriter and into executor. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-29 20:21:41 +02:00
if (rte->relname)
{
/* Normal relation RTE */
appendStringInfo(buf, "%s%s",
only_marker(rte),
quote_identifier(rte->relname));
}
else
{
/* Subquery RTE */
Assert(rte->subquery != NULL);
appendStringInfoChar(buf, '(');
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
get_query_def(rte->subquery, buf, context->namespaces);
Subselects in FROM clause, per ISO syntax: FROM (SELECT ...) [AS] alias. (Don't forget that an alias is required.) Views reimplemented as expanding to subselect-in-FROM. Grouping, aggregates, DISTINCT in views actually work now (he says optimistically). No UNION support in subselects/views yet, but I have some ideas about that. Rule-related permissions checking moved out of rewriter and into executor. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-29 20:21:41 +02:00
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ')');
}
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
if (rte->alias != NULL)
{
appendStringInfo(buf, " %s",
quote_identifier(rte->alias->relname));
if (rte->alias->attrs != NIL)
{
List *col;
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "(");
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
foreach(col, rte->alias->attrs)
{
if (col != rte->alias->attrs)
appendStringInfo(buf, ", ");
appendStringInfo(buf, "%s",
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
quote_identifier(strVal(lfirst(col))));
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
}
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ')');
}
}
}
else if (IsA(jtnode, JoinExpr))
{
JoinExpr *j = (JoinExpr *) jtnode;
appendStringInfoChar(buf, '(');
get_from_clause_item(j->larg, query, context);
if (j->isNatural)
appendStringInfo(buf, " NATURAL");
switch (j->jointype)
{
case JOIN_INNER:
if (j->quals)
appendStringInfo(buf, " JOIN ");
else
appendStringInfo(buf, " CROSS JOIN ");
break;
case JOIN_LEFT:
appendStringInfo(buf, " LEFT JOIN ");
break;
case JOIN_FULL:
appendStringInfo(buf, " FULL JOIN ");
break;
case JOIN_RIGHT:
appendStringInfo(buf, " RIGHT JOIN ");
break;
case JOIN_UNION:
appendStringInfo(buf, " UNION JOIN ");
break;
default:
elog(ERROR, "get_from_clause_item: unknown join type %d",
(int) j->jointype);
}
get_from_clause_item(j->rarg, query, context);
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
if (!j->isNatural)
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
{
if (j->using)
{
List *col;
appendStringInfo(buf, " USING (");
foreach(col, j->using)
{
if (col != j->using)
appendStringInfo(buf, ", ");
appendStringInfo(buf, "%s",
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
quote_identifier(strVal(lfirst(col))));
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
}
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ')');
}
else if (j->quals)
{
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
dpns->namespace = makeList2(j->larg, j->rarg);
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
appendStringInfo(buf, " ON (");
get_rule_expr(j->quals, context);
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ')');
}
}
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ')');
/* Yes, it's correct to put alias after the right paren ... */
if (j->alias != NULL)
{
appendStringInfo(buf, " %s",
quote_identifier(j->alias->relname));
if (j->alias->attrs != NIL)
{
List *col;
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
appendStringInfo(buf, "(");
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
foreach(col, j->alias->attrs)
{
if (col != j->alias->attrs)
appendStringInfo(buf, ", ");
appendStringInfo(buf, "%s",
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
quote_identifier(strVal(lfirst(col))));
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
}
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ')');
}
}
}
else
elog(ERROR, "get_from_clause_item: unexpected node type %d",
nodeTag(jtnode));
Change scoping of table and join refnames to conform to SQL92: a JOIN clause with an alias is a <subquery> and therefore hides table references appearing within it, according to the spec. This is the same as the preliminary patch I posted to pgsql-patches yesterday, plus some really grotty code in ruleutils.c to reverse-list a query tree with the correct alias name depending on context. I'd rather not have done that, but unless we want to force another initdb for 7.1, there's no other way for now.
2001-02-14 22:35:07 +01:00
dpns->namespace = sv_namespace;
First cut at full support for OUTER JOINs. There are still a few loose ends to clean up (see my message of same date to pghackers), but mostly it works. INITDB REQUIRED!
2000-09-12 23:07:18 +02:00
}
Fix ruleutils to produce correct output for array assignment, such as UPDATE foo SET arr[3] = 42.
2000-08-12 06:04:53 +02:00
/* ----------
* tleIsArrayAssign - check for array assignment
* ----------
*/
static bool
tleIsArrayAssign(TargetEntry *tle)
{
ArrayRef *aref;
if (tle->expr == NULL || !IsA(tle->expr, ArrayRef))
return false;
aref = (ArrayRef *) tle->expr;
if (aref->refassgnexpr == NULL)
return false;
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
Fix ruleutils to produce correct output for array assignment, such as UPDATE foo SET arr[3] = 42.
2000-08-12 06:04:53 +02:00
/*
* Currently, it should only be possible to see non-null refassgnexpr
* if we are indeed looking at an "UPDATE array[n] = expr" situation.
* So aref->refexpr ought to match the tle's target.
*/
if (aref->refexpr == NULL || !IsA(aref->refexpr, Var) ||
Fix silly typo that led to 'tleIsArrayAssign: I'm confused' message. Indeed it was.
2000-10-05 23:52:08 +02:00
((Var *) aref->refexpr)->varattno != tle->resdom->resno)
Fix ruleutils to produce correct output for array assignment, such as UPDATE foo SET arr[3] = 42.
2000-08-12 06:04:53 +02:00
elog(NOTICE, "tleIsArrayAssign: I'm confused ...");
return true;
}
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
/* ----------
* quote_identifier - Quote an identifier only if needed
*
* When quotes are needed, we palloc the required space; slightly
* space-wasteful but well worth it for notational simplicity.
* ----------
*/
static char *
quote_identifier(char *ident)
{
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
/*
* Can avoid quoting if ident starts with a lowercase letter and
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
* contains only lowercase letters, digits, and underscores, *and* is
* not any SQL keyword. Otherwise, supply quotes.
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
*/
bool safe;
char *result;
/*
* would like to use <ctype.h> macros here, but they might yield
* unwanted locale-specific results...
*/
safe = (ident[0] >= 'a' && ident[0] <= 'z');
if (safe)
{
char *ptr;
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
for (ptr = ident + 1; *ptr; ptr++)
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
{
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
char ch = *ptr;
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
safe = ((ch >= 'a' && ch <= 'z') ||
(ch >= '0' && ch <= '9') ||
(ch == '_'));
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
if (!safe)
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
break;
}
}
Rule deparser needs to quote identifiers that are spelled the same as SQL keywords.
1999-12-06 03:37:17 +01:00
if (safe)
{
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
2000-04-12 19:17:23 +02:00
Rule deparser needs to quote identifiers that are spelled the same as SQL keywords.
1999-12-06 03:37:17 +01:00
/*
* Check for keyword. This test is overly strong, since many of
* the "keywords" known to the parser are usable as column names,
* but the parser doesn't provide any easy way to test for whether
* an identifier is safe or not... so be safe not sorry.
*
pgindent run. Make it all clean.
2001-03-22 05:01:46 +01:00
* Note: ScanKeywordLookup() does case-insensitive comparison, but
* that's fine, since we already know we have all-lower-case.
Rule deparser needs to quote identifiers that are spelled the same as SQL keywords.
1999-12-06 03:37:17 +01:00
*/
if (ScanKeywordLookup(ident) != NULL)
safe = false;
}
Make the rule deparser a little less quote-happy, so that display of default expressions isn't quite so ugly.
1999-10-04 06:37:23 +02:00
if (safe)
return ident; /* no change needed */
result = (char *) palloc(strlen(ident) + 2 + 1);
sprintf(result, "\"%s\"", ident);
return result;
}
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
/* ----------
* get_relation_name - Get a relation name by Oid
* ----------
*/
static char *
get_relation_name(Oid relid)
{
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
HeapTuple classtup;
Form_pg_class classStruct;
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
char *result;
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
classtup = SearchSysCache(RELOID,
ObjectIdGetDatum(relid),
0, 0, 0);
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
if (!HeapTupleIsValid(classtup))
Change error messages to oids come out as %u and not %d. Change has no real affect now.
1999-05-10 02:46:32 +02:00
elog(ERROR, "cache lookup of relation %u failed", relid);
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
classStruct = (Form_pg_class) GETSTRUCT(classtup);
Change SearchSysCache coding conventions so that a reference count is maintained for each cache entry. A cache entry will not be freed until the matching ReleaseSysCache call has been executed. This eliminates worries about cache entries getting dropped while still in use. See my posting to pg-hackers of even date for more info.
2000-11-16 23:30:52 +01:00
result = pstrdup(NameStr(classStruct->relname));
ReleaseSysCache(classtup);
return result;
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
}
/* ----------
Make rule lister use aliases from FROM clause when a table column has been given an alias. Otherwise, results are incorrect.
2000-09-18 22:14:23 +02:00
* get_relid_attribute_name
* Get an attribute name by its relations Oid and its attnum
*
* Same as underlying syscache routine get_attname(), except that error
* is handled by elog() instead of returning NULL.
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
* ----------
*/
static char *
Make rule lister use aliases from FROM clause when a table column has been given an alias. Otherwise, results are incorrect.
2000-09-18 22:14:23 +02:00
get_relid_attribute_name(Oid relid, AttrNumber attnum)
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
{
Make rule lister use aliases from FROM clause when a table column has been given an alias. Otherwise, results are incorrect.
2000-09-18 22:14:23 +02:00
char *attname;
This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the patch is applied: Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now. Event qualifications on insert/update/delete rules work fine now. I added the new keyword OLD to reference the CURRENT tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5. Update rules can reference NEW and OLD in the rule qualification and the actions. Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to let them behave like real tables. For insert/update/delete rules multiple actions are supported now. The actions can also be surrounded by parantheses to make psql happy. Multiple actions are required if update to a view requires updates to multiple tables. Regular users are permitted to create/drop rules on tables they have RULE permissions for (DefineQueryRewrite() is now able to get around the access restrictions on pg_rewrite). This enables view creation for regular users too. This required an extra boolean parameter to pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to set skipAcl on all rangetable entries of the resulting queries. There is a new function pg_exec_query_acl_override() that could be used by backend utilities to use this facility. All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions of the event relations owner. Sample: User A creates tables T1 and T2, creates rules that log INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the regression tests for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1 to user B. User B can now fully access T1 and the logging happens in T2. But user B cannot access T2 at all, only the rule actions can. And due to missing RULE permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging. Rules on the attribute level are disabled (they don't work properly and since regular users are now permitted to create rules I decided to disable them). Rules on select must have exactly one action that is a select (so select rules must be a view definition). UPDATE NEW/OLD rules are disabled (still broken, but triggers can do it). There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin can see what the users do. They use two new functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are builtins. The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump. PostgreSQL is now the only database system I know, that has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I found a rule statement at all) use stored database procedures or the like (triggers as we call them) for active rules (as some call them). Future of the rule system: The now disabled parts of the rule system (attribute level, multiple actions on select and update new stuff) require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch. The old one is too badly wired up. After 6.4 I'll start to work on a new rewrite handler, that fully supports the attribute level rules, multiple actions on select and update new. This will be available for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities. Jan
1998-08-24 03:38:11 +02:00
Make rule lister use aliases from FROM clause when a table column has been given an alias. Otherwise, results are incorrect.
2000-09-18 22:14:23 +02:00
attname = get_attname(relid, attnum);
if (attname == NULL)
Change error messages to oids come out as %u and not %d. Change has no real affect now.
1999-05-10 02:46:32 +02:00
elog(ERROR, "cache lookup of attribute %d in relation %u failed",
OK, folks, here is the pgindent output.
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
attnum, relid);
Make rule lister use aliases from FROM clause when a table column has been given an alias. Otherwise, results are incorrect.
2000-09-18 22:14:23 +02:00
return attname;
}