postgresql/src/include/replication/walsender.h

74 lines
1.8 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* walsender.h
* Exports from replication/walsender.c.
*
* Portions Copyright (c) 2010-2020, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
*
2010-09-20 22:08:53 +02:00
* src/include/replication/walsender.h
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#ifndef _WALSENDER_H
#define _WALSENDER_H
#include <signal.h>
/*
* What to do with a snapshot in create replication slot command.
*/
typedef enum
{
CRS_EXPORT_SNAPSHOT,
CRS_NOEXPORT_SNAPSHOT,
CRS_USE_SNAPSHOT
} CRSSnapshotAction;
/* global state */
2010-02-26 03:01:40 +01:00
extern bool am_walsender;
extern bool am_cascading_walsender;
extern bool am_db_walsender;
extern bool wake_wal_senders;
/* user-settable parameters */
extern int max_wal_senders;
extern int wal_sender_timeout;
2015-05-24 03:35:49 +02:00
extern bool log_replication_commands;
extern void InitWalSender(void);
extern bool exec_replication_command(const char *query_string);
extern void WalSndErrorCleanup(void);
extern void WalSndSignals(void);
extern Size WalSndShmemSize(void);
extern void WalSndShmemInit(void);
extern void WalSndWakeup(void);
Prevent possibility of panics during shutdown checkpoint. When the checkpointer writes the shutdown checkpoint, it checks afterwards whether any WAL has been written since it started and throws a PANIC if so. At that point, only walsenders are still active, so one might think this could not happen, but walsenders can also generate WAL, for instance in BASE_BACKUP and logical decoding related commands (e.g. via hint bits). So they can trigger this panic if such a command is run while the shutdown checkpoint is being written. To fix this, divide the walsender shutdown into two phases. First, checkpointer, itself triggered by postmaster, sends a PROCSIG_WALSND_INIT_STOPPING signal to all walsenders. If the backend is idle or runs an SQL query this causes the backend to shutdown, if logical replication is in progress all existing WAL records are processed followed by a shutdown. Otherwise this causes the walsender to switch to the "stopping" state. In this state, the walsender will reject any further replication commands. The checkpointer begins the shutdown checkpoint once all walsenders are confirmed as stopping. When the shutdown checkpoint finishes, the postmaster sends us SIGUSR2. This instructs walsender to send any outstanding WAL, including the shutdown checkpoint record, wait for it to be replicated to the standby, and then exit. Author: Andres Freund, based on an earlier patch by Michael Paquier Reported-By: Fujii Masao, Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170602002912.tqlwn4gymzlxpvs2@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 9.4, where logical decoding was introduced
2017-06-06 03:53:41 +02:00
extern void WalSndInitStopping(void);
extern void WalSndWaitStopping(void);
extern void HandleWalSndInitStopping(void);
extern void WalSndRqstFileReload(void);
/*
* Remember that we want to wakeup walsenders later
*
* This is separated from doing the actual wakeup because the writeout is done
* while holding contended locks.
*/
#define WalSndWakeupRequest() \
do { wake_wal_senders = true; } while (0)
/*
* wakeup walsenders if there is work to be done
*/
#define WalSndWakeupProcessRequests() \
do \
{ \
if (wake_wal_senders) \
{ \
wake_wal_senders = false; \
if (max_wal_senders > 0) \
WalSndWakeup(); \
} \
} while (0)
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
#endif /* _WALSENDER_H */