1997-12-04 01:34:01 +01:00
|
|
|
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
1999-02-14 00:22:53 +01:00
|
|
|
* user.h
|
2005-06-28 07:09:14 +02:00
|
|
|
* Commands for manipulating roles (formerly called users).
|
1997-12-04 01:34:01 +01:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
2010-09-20 22:08:53 +02:00
|
|
|
* src/include/commands/user.h
|
1997-12-04 01:34:01 +01:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef USER_H
|
|
|
|
|
#define USER_H
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change many routines to return ObjectAddress rather than OID
The changed routines are mostly those that can be directly called by
ProcessUtilitySlow; the intention is to make the affected object
information more precise, in support for future event trigger changes.
Originally it was envisioned that the OID of the affected object would
be enough, and in most cases that is correct, but upon actually
implementing the event trigger changes it turned out that ObjectAddress
is more widely useful.
Additionally, some command execution routines grew an output argument
that's an object address which provides further info about the executed
command. To wit:
* for ALTER DOMAIN / ADD CONSTRAINT, it corresponds to the address of
the new constraint
* for ALTER OBJECT / SET SCHEMA, it corresponds to the address of the
schema that originally contained the object.
* for ALTER EXTENSION {ADD, DROP} OBJECT, it corresponds to the address
of the object added to or dropped from the extension.
There's no user-visible change in this commit, and no functional change
either.
Discussion: 20150218213255.GC6717@tamriel.snowman.net
Reviewed-By: Stephen Frost, Andres Freund
2015-03-03 18:10:50 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "catalog/objectaddress.h"
|
Replace isMD5() with a more future-proof way to check if pw is encrypted.
The rule is that if pg_authid.rolpassword begins with "md5" and has the
right length, it's an MD5 hash, otherwise it's a plaintext password. The
idiom has been to use isMD5() to check for that, but that gets awkward,
when we add new kinds of verifiers, like the verifiers for SCRAM
authentication in the pending SCRAM patch set. Replace isMD5() with a new
get_password_type() function, so that when new verifier types are added, we
don't need to remember to modify every place that currently calls isMD5(),
to also recognize the new kinds of verifiers.
Also, use the new plain_crypt_verify function in passwordcheck, so that it
doesn't need to know about MD5, or in the future, about other kinds of
hashes or password verifiers.
Reviewed by Michael Paquier and Peter Eisentraut.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2d07165c-1793-e243-a2a9-e45b624c7580@iki.fi
2017-02-01 12:11:37 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "libpq/crypt.h"
|
1999-07-14 03:20:30 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "nodes/parsenodes.h"
|
2016-09-06 18:00:00 +02:00
|
|
|
#include "parser/parse_node.h"
|
1999-07-14 03:20:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Replace isMD5() with a more future-proof way to check if pw is encrypted.
The rule is that if pg_authid.rolpassword begins with "md5" and has the
right length, it's an MD5 hash, otherwise it's a plaintext password. The
idiom has been to use isMD5() to check for that, but that gets awkward,
when we add new kinds of verifiers, like the verifiers for SCRAM
authentication in the pending SCRAM patch set. Replace isMD5() with a new
get_password_type() function, so that when new verifier types are added, we
don't need to remember to modify every place that currently calls isMD5(),
to also recognize the new kinds of verifiers.
Also, use the new plain_crypt_verify function in passwordcheck, so that it
doesn't need to know about MD5, or in the future, about other kinds of
hashes or password verifiers.
Reviewed by Michael Paquier and Peter Eisentraut.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2d07165c-1793-e243-a2a9-e45b624c7580@iki.fi
2017-02-01 12:11:37 +01:00
|
|
|
/* GUC. Is actually of type PasswordType. */
|
|
|
|
|
extern int Password_encryption;
|
2016-09-28 11:22:44 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Hook to check passwords in CreateRole() and AlterRole() */
|
Replace isMD5() with a more future-proof way to check if pw is encrypted.
The rule is that if pg_authid.rolpassword begins with "md5" and has the
right length, it's an MD5 hash, otherwise it's a plaintext password. The
idiom has been to use isMD5() to check for that, but that gets awkward,
when we add new kinds of verifiers, like the verifiers for SCRAM
authentication in the pending SCRAM patch set. Replace isMD5() with a new
get_password_type() function, so that when new verifier types are added, we
don't need to remember to modify every place that currently calls isMD5(),
to also recognize the new kinds of verifiers.
Also, use the new plain_crypt_verify function in passwordcheck, so that it
doesn't need to know about MD5, or in the future, about other kinds of
hashes or password verifiers.
Reviewed by Michael Paquier and Peter Eisentraut.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2d07165c-1793-e243-a2a9-e45b624c7580@iki.fi
2017-02-01 12:11:37 +01:00
|
|
|
typedef void (*check_password_hook_type) (const char *username, const char *shadow_pass, PasswordType password_type, Datum validuntil_time, bool validuntil_null);
|
2009-11-18 22:57:56 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extern PGDLLIMPORT check_password_hook_type check_password_hook;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-06 18:00:00 +02:00
|
|
|
extern Oid CreateRole(ParseState *pstate, CreateRoleStmt *stmt);
|
2013-05-29 22:58:43 +02:00
|
|
|
extern Oid AlterRole(AlterRoleStmt *stmt);
|
|
|
|
|
extern Oid AlterRoleSet(AlterRoleSetStmt *stmt);
|
2005-06-28 07:09:14 +02:00
|
|
|
extern void DropRole(DropRoleStmt *stmt);
|
|
|
|
|
extern void GrantRole(GrantRoleStmt *stmt);
|
Change many routines to return ObjectAddress rather than OID
The changed routines are mostly those that can be directly called by
ProcessUtilitySlow; the intention is to make the affected object
information more precise, in support for future event trigger changes.
Originally it was envisioned that the OID of the affected object would
be enough, and in most cases that is correct, but upon actually
implementing the event trigger changes it turned out that ObjectAddress
is more widely useful.
Additionally, some command execution routines grew an output argument
that's an object address which provides further info about the executed
command. To wit:
* for ALTER DOMAIN / ADD CONSTRAINT, it corresponds to the address of
the new constraint
* for ALTER OBJECT / SET SCHEMA, it corresponds to the address of the
schema that originally contained the object.
* for ALTER EXTENSION {ADD, DROP} OBJECT, it corresponds to the address
of the object added to or dropped from the extension.
There's no user-visible change in this commit, and no functional change
either.
Discussion: 20150218213255.GC6717@tamriel.snowman.net
Reviewed-By: Stephen Frost, Andres Freund
2015-03-03 18:10:50 +01:00
|
|
|
extern ObjectAddress RenameRole(const char *oldname, const char *newname);
|
2006-10-04 02:30:14 +02:00
|
|
|
extern void DropOwnedObjects(DropOwnedStmt *stmt);
|
|
|
|
|
extern void ReassignOwnedObjects(ReassignOwnedStmt *stmt);
|
Allow CURRENT/SESSION_USER to be used in certain commands
Commands such as ALTER USER, ALTER GROUP, ALTER ROLE, GRANT, and the
various ALTER OBJECT / OWNER TO, as well as ad-hoc clauses related to
roles such as the AUTHORIZATION clause of CREATE SCHEMA, the FOR clause
of CREATE USER MAPPING, and the FOR ROLE clause of ALTER DEFAULT
PRIVILEGES can now take the keywords CURRENT_USER and SESSION_USER as
user specifiers in place of an explicit user name.
This commit also fixes some quite ugly handling of special standards-
mandated syntax in CREATE USER MAPPING, which in particular would fail
to work in presence of a role named "current_user".
The special role specifiers PUBLIC and NONE also have more consistent
handling now.
Also take the opportunity to add location tracking to user specifiers.
Authors: Kyotaro Horiguchi. Heavily reworked by Álvaro Herrera.
Reviewed by: Rushabh Lathia, Adam Brightwell, Marti Raudsepp.
2015-03-09 19:41:54 +01:00
|
|
|
extern List *roleSpecsToIds(List *memberNames);
|
1999-12-16 18:24:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
Phase 2 of pgindent updates.
Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments
to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments
following #endif to not obey the general rule.
Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using
the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that
tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of
code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be
moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's
code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops
in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working
in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the
net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed
one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves
more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such
cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after
the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after.
Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same
as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else.
That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage
from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent.
This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent
changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
|
|
|
#endif /* USER_H */
|
