postgresql/src/include/executor/execdebug.h

129 lines
3.8 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
* execdebug.h
* #defines governing debugging behaviour in the executor
*
* XXX this is all pretty old and crufty. Newer code tends to use elog()
* for debug printouts, because that's more flexible than printf().
*
*
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2019, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
2010-09-20 22:08:53 +02:00
* src/include/executor/execdebug.h
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#ifndef EXECDEBUG_H
#define EXECDEBUG_H
2000-06-15 02:52:26 +02:00
#include "executor/executor.h"
#include "nodes/print.h"
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* debugging defines.
*
* If you want certain debugging behaviour, then #define
* the variable to 1. No need to explicitly #undef by default,
* since we can use -D compiler options to enable features.
* - thomas 1999-02-20
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
/* ----------------
* EXEC_NESTLOOPDEBUG is a flag which turns on debugging of the
* nest loop node by NL_printf() and ENL_printf() in nodeNestloop.c
* ----------------
#undef EXEC_NESTLOOPDEBUG
*/
/* ----------------
* EXEC_SORTDEBUG is a flag which turns on debugging of
* the ExecSort() stuff by SO_printf() in nodeSort.c
* ----------------
#undef EXEC_SORTDEBUG
*/
/* ----------------
* EXEC_MERGEJOINDEBUG is a flag which turns on debugging of
* the ExecMergeJoin() stuff by MJ_printf() in nodeMergejoin.c
* ----------------
#undef EXEC_MERGEJOINDEBUG
*/
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------
* #defines controlled by above definitions
*
* Note: most of these are "incomplete" because I didn't
* need the ones not defined. More should be added
* only as necessary -cim 10/26/89
* ----------------------------------------------------------------
*/
#define T_OR_F(b) ((b) ? "true" : "false")
#define NULL_OR_TUPLE(slot) (TupIsNull(slot) ? "null" : "a tuple")
/* ----------------
* nest loop debugging defines
* ----------------
*/
#ifdef EXEC_NESTLOOPDEBUG
#define NL_nodeDisplay(l) nodeDisplay(l)
#define NL_printf(s) printf(s)
#define NL1_printf(s, a) printf(s, a)
#define ENL1_printf(message) printf("ExecNestLoop: %s\n", message)
#else
#define NL_nodeDisplay(l)
#define NL_printf(s)
#define NL1_printf(s, a)
#define ENL1_printf(message)
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
#endif /* EXEC_NESTLOOPDEBUG */
/* ----------------
* sort node debugging defines
* ----------------
*/
#ifdef EXEC_SORTDEBUG
#define SO_nodeDisplay(l) nodeDisplay(l)
#define SO_printf(s) printf(s)
#define SO1_printf(s, p) printf(s, p)
#else
#define SO_nodeDisplay(l)
#define SO_printf(s)
#define SO1_printf(s, p)
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
#endif /* EXEC_SORTDEBUG */
/* ----------------
* merge join debugging defines
* ----------------
*/
#ifdef EXEC_MERGEJOINDEBUG
#define MJ_nodeDisplay(l) nodeDisplay(l)
#define MJ_printf(s) printf(s)
#define MJ1_printf(s, p) printf(s, p)
#define MJ2_printf(s, p1, p2) printf(s, p1, p2)
#define MJ_debugtup(slot) debugtup(slot, NULL)
#define MJ_dump(state) ExecMergeTupleDump(state)
#define MJ_DEBUG_COMPARE(res) \
MJ1_printf(" MJCompare() returns %d\n", (res))
#define MJ_DEBUG_QUAL(clause, res) \
MJ2_printf(" ExecQual(%s, econtext) returns %s\n", \
CppAsString(clause), T_OR_F(res))
#define MJ_DEBUG_PROC_NODE(slot) \
MJ2_printf(" %s = ExecProcNode(...) returns %s\n", \
CppAsString(slot), NULL_OR_TUPLE(slot))
#else
#define MJ_nodeDisplay(l)
#define MJ_printf(s)
#define MJ1_printf(s, p)
#define MJ2_printf(s, p1, p2)
#define MJ_debugtup(slot)
#define MJ_dump(state)
#define MJ_DEBUG_COMPARE(res)
#define MJ_DEBUG_QUAL(clause, res)
#define MJ_DEBUG_PROC_NODE(slot)
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
#endif /* EXEC_MERGEJOINDEBUG */
Phase 2 of pgindent updates. Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
#endif /* EXECDEBUG_H */