1998-07-08 16:10:30 +02:00
|
|
|
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*
|
1999-02-14 00:22:53 +01:00
|
|
|
* int8.h
|
1998-07-08 16:10:30 +02:00
|
|
|
* Declarations for operations on 64-bit integers.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
2017-01-03 19:48:53 +01:00
|
|
|
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2017, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
2000-01-26 06:58:53 +01:00
|
|
|
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
|
1998-07-08 16:10:30 +02:00
|
|
|
*
|
2010-09-20 22:08:53 +02:00
|
|
|
* src/include/utils/int8.h
|
1998-07-08 16:10:30 +02:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* NOTES
|
|
|
|
* These data types are supported on all 64-bit architectures, and may
|
1998-09-01 06:40:42 +02:00
|
|
|
* be supported through libraries on some 32-bit machines. If your machine
|
|
|
|
* is not currently supported, then please try to make it so, then post
|
|
|
|
* patches to the postgresql.org hackers mailing list.
|
1998-07-08 16:10:30 +02:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#ifndef INT8_H
|
|
|
|
#define INT8_H
|
|
|
|
|
Extend pg_cast castimplicit column to a three-way value; this allows us
to be flexible about assignment casts without introducing ambiguity in
operator/function resolution. Introduce a well-defined promotion hierarchy
for numeric datatypes (int2->int4->int8->numeric->float4->float8).
Change make_const to initially label numeric literals as int4, int8, or
numeric (never float8 anymore).
Explicitly mark Func and RelabelType nodes to indicate whether they came
from a function call, explicit cast, or implicit cast; use this to do
reverse-listing more accurately and without so many heuristics.
Explicit casts to char, varchar, bit, varbit will truncate or pad without
raising an error (the pre-7.2 behavior), while assigning to a column without
any explicit cast will still raise an error for wrong-length data like 7.3.
This more nearly follows the SQL spec than 7.2 behavior (we should be
reporting a 'completion condition' in the explicit-cast cases, but we have
no mechanism for that, so just do silent truncation).
Fix some problems with enforcement of typmod for array elements;
it didn't work at all in 'UPDATE ... SET array[n] = foo', for example.
Provide a generalized array_length_coerce() function to replace the
specialized per-array-type functions that used to be needed (and were
missing for NUMERIC as well as all the datetime types).
Add missing conversions int8<->float4, text<->numeric, oid<->int8.
initdb forced.
2002-09-18 23:35:25 +02:00
|
|
|
extern bool scanint8(const char *str, bool errorOK, int64 *result);
|
|
|
|
|
Phase 2 of pgindent updates.
Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments
to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments
following #endif to not obey the general rule.
Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using
the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that
tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of
code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be
moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's
code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops
in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working
in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the
net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed
one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves
more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such
cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after
the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after.
Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same
as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else.
That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage
from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent.
This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent
changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
2017-06-21 21:18:54 +02:00
|
|
|
#endif /* INT8_H */
|