postgresql/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_operator.sgml

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

361 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

<!--
2010-09-20 22:08:53 +02:00
doc/src/sgml/ref/create_operator.sgml
PostgreSQL documentation
-->
<refentry id="sql-createoperator">
<indexterm zone="sql-createoperator">
<primary>CREATE OPERATOR</primary>
</indexterm>
<refmeta>
<refentrytitle>CREATE OPERATOR</refentrytitle>
<manvolnum>7</manvolnum>
<refmiscinfo>SQL - Language Statements</refmiscinfo>
</refmeta>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<refnamediv>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<refname>CREATE OPERATOR</refname>
<refpurpose>define a new operator</refpurpose>
</refnamediv>
<refsynopsisdiv>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<synopsis>
CREATE OPERATOR <replaceable>name</replaceable> (
{FUNCTION|PROCEDURE} = <replaceable class="parameter">function_name</replaceable>
[, LEFTARG = <replaceable class="parameter">left_type</replaceable> ] [, RIGHTARG = <replaceable class="parameter">right_type</replaceable> ]
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
[, COMMUTATOR = <replaceable class="parameter">com_op</replaceable> ] [, NEGATOR = <replaceable class="parameter">neg_op</replaceable> ]
[, RESTRICT = <replaceable class="parameter">res_proc</replaceable> ] [, JOIN = <replaceable class="parameter">join_proc</replaceable> ]
[, HASHES ] [, MERGES ]
)
</synopsis>
</refsynopsisdiv>
<refsect1>
<title>Description</title>
<para>
<command>CREATE OPERATOR</command> defines a new operator,
<replaceable class="parameter">name</replaceable>. The user who
defines an operator becomes its owner. If a schema name is given
then the operator is created in the specified schema. Otherwise it
is created in the current schema.
</para>
<para>
The operator name is a sequence of up to <symbol>NAMEDATALEN</symbol>-1
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
(63 by default) characters from the following list:
<literallayout>
+ - * / &lt; &gt; = ~ ! @ # % ^ &amp; | ` ?
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
</literallayout>
There are a few restrictions on your choice of name:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
<literal>--</literal> and <literal>/*</literal> cannot appear anywhere in an operator name,
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
since they will be taken as the start of a comment.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
A multicharacter operator name cannot end in <literal>+</literal> or
<literal>-</literal>,
unless the name also contains at least one of these characters:
<literallayout>
~ ! @ # % ^ &amp; | ` ?
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
</literallayout>
For example, <literal>@-</literal> is an allowed operator name,
but <literal>*-</literal> is not.
This restriction allows <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> to
parse SQL-compliant commands without requiring spaces between tokens.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
The symbol <literal>=&gt;</literal> is reserved by the SQL grammar,
so it cannot be used as an operator name.
</para>
</listitem>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
</itemizedlist>
</para>
<para>
The operator <literal>!=</literal> is mapped to
<literal>&lt;&gt;</literal> on input, so these two names are always
equivalent.
</para>
<para>
For binary operators, both <literal>LEFTARG</literal> and
<literal>RIGHTARG</literal> must be defined. For prefix operators only
<literal>RIGHTARG</literal> should be defined.
The <replaceable class="parameter">function_name</replaceable>
function must have been previously defined using <command>CREATE
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
FUNCTION</command> and must be defined to accept the correct number
of arguments (either one or two) of the indicated types.
</para>
<para>
In the syntax of <literal>CREATE OPERATOR</literal>, the keywords
<literal>FUNCTION</literal> and <literal>PROCEDURE</literal> are
equivalent, but the referenced function must in any case be a function, not
a procedure. The use of the keyword <literal>PROCEDURE</literal> here is
historical and deprecated.
</para>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<para>
Extend ALTER OPERATOR to allow setting more optimization attributes. Allow the COMMUTATOR, NEGATOR, MERGES, and HASHES attributes to be set by ALTER OPERATOR. However, we don't allow COMMUTATOR/NEGATOR to be changed once set, nor allow the MERGES/HASHES flags to be unset once set. Changes like that might invalidate plans already made, and dealing with the consequences seems like more trouble than it's worth. The main use-case we foresee for this is to allow addition of missed properties in extension update scripts, such as extending an existing operator to support hashing. So only transitions from not-set to set states seem very useful. This patch also causes us to reject some incorrect cases that formerly resulted in inconsistent catalog state, such as trying to set the commutator of an operator to be some other operator that already has a (different) commutator. While at it, move the InvokeObjectPostCreateHook call for CREATE OPERATOR to not occur until after we've fixed up commutator or negator links as needed. The previous ordering could only be justified by thinking of the OperatorUpd call as a kind of ALTER OPERATOR step; but we don't call InvokeObjectPostAlterHook therein. It seems better to let the hook see the final state of the operator object. In the documentation, move the discussion of how to establish commutator pairs from xoper.sgml to the CREATE OPERATOR ref page. Tommy Pavlicek, reviewed and editorialized a bit by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEhP-W-vGVzf4udhR5M8Bdv88UYnPrhoSkj3ieR3QNrsGQoqdg@mail.gmail.com
2023-10-20 18:28:38 +02:00
The other clauses specify optional operator optimization attributes.
Their meaning is detailed in <xref linkend="xoper-optimization"/>.
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
</para>
<para>
To be able to create an operator, you must have <literal>USAGE</literal>
privilege on the argument types and the return type, as well
as <literal>EXECUTE</literal> privilege on the underlying function. If a
Extend ALTER OPERATOR to allow setting more optimization attributes. Allow the COMMUTATOR, NEGATOR, MERGES, and HASHES attributes to be set by ALTER OPERATOR. However, we don't allow COMMUTATOR/NEGATOR to be changed once set, nor allow the MERGES/HASHES flags to be unset once set. Changes like that might invalidate plans already made, and dealing with the consequences seems like more trouble than it's worth. The main use-case we foresee for this is to allow addition of missed properties in extension update scripts, such as extending an existing operator to support hashing. So only transitions from not-set to set states seem very useful. This patch also causes us to reject some incorrect cases that formerly resulted in inconsistent catalog state, such as trying to set the commutator of an operator to be some other operator that already has a (different) commutator. While at it, move the InvokeObjectPostCreateHook call for CREATE OPERATOR to not occur until after we've fixed up commutator or negator links as needed. The previous ordering could only be justified by thinking of the OperatorUpd call as a kind of ALTER OPERATOR step; but we don't call InvokeObjectPostAlterHook therein. It seems better to let the hook see the final state of the operator object. In the documentation, move the discussion of how to establish commutator pairs from xoper.sgml to the CREATE OPERATOR ref page. Tommy Pavlicek, reviewed and editorialized a bit by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEhP-W-vGVzf4udhR5M8Bdv88UYnPrhoSkj3ieR3QNrsGQoqdg@mail.gmail.com
2023-10-20 18:28:38 +02:00
commutator or negator operator is specified, you must own those operators.
</para>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
</refsect1>
<refsect1>
<title>Parameters</title>
<variablelist>
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable class="parameter">name</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
The name of the operator to be defined. See above for allowable
characters. The name can be schema-qualified, for example
<literal>CREATE OPERATOR myschema.+ (...)</literal>. If not, then
the operator is created in the current schema. Two operators
in the same schema can have the same name if they operate on
different data types. This is called
<firstterm>overloading</firstterm>.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable class="parameter">function_name</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
The function used to implement this operator.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable class="parameter">left_type</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
The data type of the operator's left operand, if any.
This option would be omitted for a prefix operator.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable class="parameter">right_type</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
The data type of the operator's right operand.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable class="parameter">com_op</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
The commutator of this operator.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable class="parameter">neg_op</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
The negator of this operator.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable class="parameter">res_proc</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
The restriction selectivity estimator function for this operator.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable class="parameter">join_proc</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
The join selectivity estimator function for this operator.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<varlistentry>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<term><literal>HASHES</literal></term>
<listitem>
<para>
Indicates this operator can support a hash join.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<varlistentry>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<term><literal>MERGES</literal></term>
<listitem>
<para>
Indicates this operator can support a merge join.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
<para>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
To give a schema-qualified operator name in <replaceable
class="parameter">com_op</replaceable> or the other optional
arguments, use the <literal>OPERATOR()</literal> syntax, for example:
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<programlisting>
COMMUTATOR = OPERATOR(myschema.===) ,
</programlisting></para>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
</refsect1>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<refsect1>
<title>Notes</title>
<para>
Extend ALTER OPERATOR to allow setting more optimization attributes. Allow the COMMUTATOR, NEGATOR, MERGES, and HASHES attributes to be set by ALTER OPERATOR. However, we don't allow COMMUTATOR/NEGATOR to be changed once set, nor allow the MERGES/HASHES flags to be unset once set. Changes like that might invalidate plans already made, and dealing with the consequences seems like more trouble than it's worth. The main use-case we foresee for this is to allow addition of missed properties in extension update scripts, such as extending an existing operator to support hashing. So only transitions from not-set to set states seem very useful. This patch also causes us to reject some incorrect cases that formerly resulted in inconsistent catalog state, such as trying to set the commutator of an operator to be some other operator that already has a (different) commutator. While at it, move the InvokeObjectPostCreateHook call for CREATE OPERATOR to not occur until after we've fixed up commutator or negator links as needed. The previous ordering could only be justified by thinking of the OperatorUpd call as a kind of ALTER OPERATOR step; but we don't call InvokeObjectPostAlterHook therein. It seems better to let the hook see the final state of the operator object. In the documentation, move the discussion of how to establish commutator pairs from xoper.sgml to the CREATE OPERATOR ref page. Tommy Pavlicek, reviewed and editorialized a bit by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEhP-W-vGVzf4udhR5M8Bdv88UYnPrhoSkj3ieR3QNrsGQoqdg@mail.gmail.com
2023-10-20 18:28:38 +02:00
Refer to <xref linkend="xoper"/> and <xref linkend="xoper-optimization"/>
for further information.
</para>
<para>
When you are defining a self-commutative operator, you just do it.
When you are defining a pair of commutative operators, things are
a little trickier: how can the first one to be defined refer to the
other one, which you haven't defined yet? There are three solutions
to this problem:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
One way is to omit the <literal>COMMUTATOR</literal> clause in the
first operator that you define, and then provide one in the second
operator's definition. Since <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>
knows that commutative operators come in pairs, when it sees the
second definition it will automatically go back and fill in the
missing <literal>COMMUTATOR</literal> clause in the first
definition.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Another, more straightforward way is just to
include <literal>COMMUTATOR</literal> clauses in both definitions.
When <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> processes the first
definition and realizes that <literal>COMMUTATOR</literal> refers to
a nonexistent operator, the system will make a dummy entry for that
operator in the system catalog. This dummy entry will have valid
data only for the operator name, left and right operand types, and
owner, since that's all that <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>
can deduce at this point. The first operator's catalog entry will
link to this dummy entry. Later, when you define the second
operator, the system updates the dummy entry with the additional
information from the second definition. If you try to use the dummy
operator before it's been filled in, you'll just get an error
message.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Alternatively, both operators can be defined
without <literal>COMMUTATOR</literal> clauses
and then <command>ALTER OPERATOR</command> can be used to set their
commutator links. It's sufficient to <command>ALTER</command>
either one of the pair.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
In all three cases, you must own both operators in order to mark
them as commutators.
</para>
<para>
Pairs of negator operators can be defined using the same methods
as for commutator pairs.
</para>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<para>
It is not possible to specify an operator's lexical precedence in
<command>CREATE OPERATOR</command>, because the parser's precedence behavior
is hard-wired. See <xref linkend="sql-precedence"/> for precedence details.
</para>
<para>
The obsolete options <literal>SORT1</literal>, <literal>SORT2</literal>,
<literal>LTCMP</literal>, and <literal>GTCMP</literal> were formerly used to
2007-11-28 16:42:31 +01:00
specify the names of sort operators associated with a merge-joinable
operator. This is no longer necessary, since information about
2007-11-28 16:42:31 +01:00
associated operators is found by looking at B-tree operator families
instead. If one of these options is given, it is ignored except
for implicitly setting <literal>MERGES</literal> true.
</para>
<para>
Improve <xref> vs. <command> formatting in the documentation SQL commands are generally marked up as <command>, except when a link to a reference page is used using <xref>. But the latter doesn't create monospace markup, so this looks strange especially when a paragraph contains a mix of links and non-links. We considered putting <command> in the <refentrytitle> on the target side, but that creates some formatting side effects elsewhere. Generally, it seems safer to solve this on the link source side. We can't put the <xref> inside the <command>; the DTD doesn't allow this. DocBook 5 would allow the <command> to have the linkend attribute itself, but we are not there yet. So to solve this for now, convert the <xref>s to <link> plus <command>. This gives the correct look and also gives some more flexibility what we can put into the link text (e.g., subcommands or other clauses). In the future, these could then be converted to DocBook 5 style. I haven't converted absolutely all xrefs to SQL command reference pages, only those where we care about the appearance of the link text or where it was otherwise appropriate to make the appearance match a bit better. Also in some cases, the links where repetitive, so in those cases the links where just removed and replaced by a plain <command>. In cases where we just want the link and don't specifically care about the generated link text (typically phrased "for further information see <xref ...>") the xref is kept. Reported-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/87o8pco34z.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org
2020-10-03 16:16:51 +02:00
Use <link linkend="sql-dropoperator"><command>DROP OPERATOR</command></link> to delete user-defined operators
from a database. Use <link linkend="sql-alteroperator"><command>ALTER OPERATOR</command></link> to modify operators in a
database.
</para>
</refsect1>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<refsect1>
<title>Examples</title>
<para>
The following command defines a new operator, area-equality, for
the data type <type>box</type>:
<programlisting>
CREATE OPERATOR === (
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
LEFTARG = box,
RIGHTARG = box,
FUNCTION = area_equal_function,
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
COMMUTATOR = ===,
NEGATOR = !==,
RESTRICT = area_restriction_function,
JOIN = area_join_function,
HASHES, MERGES
);
</programlisting></para>
</refsect1>
2003-04-22 12:08:08 +02:00
<refsect1>
<title>Compatibility</title>
<para>
<command>CREATE OPERATOR</command> is a
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> extension. There are no
provisions for user-defined operators in the SQL standard.
</para>
</refsect1>
2005-01-04 01:39:53 +01:00
<refsect1>
<title>See Also</title>
<simplelist type="inline">
<member><xref linkend="sql-alteroperator"/></member>
<member><xref linkend="sql-createopclass"/></member>
<member><xref linkend="sql-dropoperator"/></member>
2005-01-04 01:39:53 +01:00
</simplelist>
</refsect1>
</refentry>