postgresql/doc/src/sgml/ref/rollback_to.sgml

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

160 lines
4.4 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

<!--
2010-09-20 22:08:53 +02:00
doc/src/sgml/ref/rollback_to.sgml
PostgreSQL documentation
-->
<refentry id="sql-rollback-to">
<indexterm zone="sql-rollback-to">
<primary>ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT</primary>
</indexterm>
<indexterm zone="sql-rollback-to">
<primary>savepoints</primary>
<secondary>rolling back</secondary>
</indexterm>
<refmeta>
<refentrytitle>ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT</refentrytitle>
<manvolnum>7</manvolnum>
<refmiscinfo>SQL - Language Statements</refmiscinfo>
</refmeta>
<refnamediv>
<refname>ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT</refname>
<refpurpose>roll back to a savepoint</refpurpose>
</refnamediv>
<refsynopsisdiv>
<synopsis>
ROLLBACK [ WORK | TRANSACTION ] TO [ SAVEPOINT ] <replaceable>savepoint_name</replaceable>
</synopsis>
</refsynopsisdiv>
<refsect1>
<title>Description</title>
<para>
Roll back all commands that were executed after the savepoint was
established and then start a new subtransaction at the same transaction level.
The savepoint remains valid and can be rolled back to again later,
if needed.
</para>
<para>
<command>ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT</command> implicitly destroys all savepoints that
were established after the named savepoint.
</para>
</refsect1>
<refsect1>
<title>Parameters</title>
<variablelist>
<varlistentry>
<term><replaceable class="parameter">savepoint_name</replaceable></term>
<listitem>
<para>
The savepoint to roll back to.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
</refsect1>
<refsect1>
<title>Notes</title>
<para>
Improve <xref> vs. <command> formatting in the documentation SQL commands are generally marked up as <command>, except when a link to a reference page is used using <xref>. But the latter doesn't create monospace markup, so this looks strange especially when a paragraph contains a mix of links and non-links. We considered putting <command> in the <refentrytitle> on the target side, but that creates some formatting side effects elsewhere. Generally, it seems safer to solve this on the link source side. We can't put the <xref> inside the <command>; the DTD doesn't allow this. DocBook 5 would allow the <command> to have the linkend attribute itself, but we are not there yet. So to solve this for now, convert the <xref>s to <link> plus <command>. This gives the correct look and also gives some more flexibility what we can put into the link text (e.g., subcommands or other clauses). In the future, these could then be converted to DocBook 5 style. I haven't converted absolutely all xrefs to SQL command reference pages, only those where we care about the appearance of the link text or where it was otherwise appropriate to make the appearance match a bit better. Also in some cases, the links where repetitive, so in those cases the links where just removed and replaced by a plain <command>. In cases where we just want the link and don't specifically care about the generated link text (typically phrased "for further information see <xref ...>") the xref is kept. Reported-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/87o8pco34z.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org
2020-10-03 16:16:51 +02:00
Use <link linkend="sql-release-savepoint"><command>RELEASE SAVEPOINT</command></link> to destroy a savepoint
without discarding the effects of commands executed after it was
established.
</para>
<para>
Specifying a savepoint name that has not been established is an error.
</para>
<para>
Cursors have somewhat non-transactional behavior with respect to
savepoints. Any cursor that is opened inside a savepoint will be closed
when the savepoint is rolled back. If a previously opened cursor is
affected by a <command>FETCH</command> or <command>MOVE</command> command inside a
savepoint that is later rolled back, the cursor remains at the
position that <command>FETCH</command> left it pointing to (that is, the cursor
motion caused by <command>FETCH</command> is not rolled back).
Closing a cursor is not undone by rolling back, either.
However, other side-effects caused by the cursor's query (such as
side-effects of volatile functions called by the query) <emphasis>are</emphasis>
rolled back if they occur during a savepoint that is later rolled back.
A cursor whose execution causes a transaction to abort is put in a
cannot-execute state, so while the transaction can be restored using
<command>ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT</command>, the cursor can no longer be used.
</para>
</refsect1>
<refsect1>
<title>Examples</title>
<para>
To undo the effects of the commands executed after <literal>my_savepoint</literal>
was established:
<programlisting>
ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT my_savepoint;
</programlisting>
</para>
<para>
Cursor positions are not affected by savepoint rollback:
<programlisting>
BEGIN;
DECLARE foo CURSOR FOR SELECT 1 UNION SELECT 2;
SAVEPOINT foo;
FETCH 1 FROM foo;
?column?
----------
1
ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT foo;
FETCH 1 FROM foo;
?column?
----------
2
COMMIT;
</programlisting></para>
</refsect1>
<refsect1>
<title>Compatibility</title>
<para>
The <acronym>SQL</acronym> standard specifies that the key word
<literal>SAVEPOINT</literal> is mandatory, but <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>
and <productname>Oracle</productname> allow it to be omitted. SQL allows
only <literal>WORK</literal>, not <literal>TRANSACTION</literal>, as a noise word
after <literal>ROLLBACK</literal>. Also, SQL has an optional clause
<literal>AND [ NO ] CHAIN</literal> which is not currently supported by
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname>. Otherwise, this command conforms to
the SQL standard.
</para>
</refsect1>
<refsect1>
<title>See Also</title>
<simplelist type="inline">
<member><xref linkend="sql-begin"/></member>
<member><xref linkend="sql-commit"/></member>
<member><xref linkend="sql-release-savepoint"/></member>
<member><xref linkend="sql-rollback"/></member>
<member><xref linkend="sql-savepoint"/></member>
</simplelist>
</refsect1>
</refentry>