Remove tabs from SGML source files.

This commit is contained in:
Bruce Momjian 2007-04-18 20:44:53 +00:00
parent ef23a77441
commit 05cd021c30
1 changed files with 11 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml,v 1.71 2007/04/16 18:29:50 alvherre Exp $ -->
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/maintenance.sgml,v 1.72 2007/04/18 20:44:53 momjian Exp $ -->
<chapter id="maintenance">
<title>Routine Database Maintenance Tasks</title>
@ -481,11 +481,11 @@ HINT: Stop the postmaster and use a standalone backend to VACUUM in "mydb".
</para>
<para>
Beginning in <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> 8.3, autovacuum has a
multi-process architecture: there is a daemon process, called the
<firstterm>autovacuum launcher</firstterm>, which is in charge of starting
an <firstterm>autovacuum worker</firstterm> process on each database every
<xref linkend="guc-autovacuum-naptime"> seconds.
Beginning in <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> 8.3, autovacuum has a
multi-process architecture: there is a daemon process, called the
<firstterm>autovacuum launcher</firstterm>, which is in charge of starting
an <firstterm>autovacuum worker</firstterm> process on each database every
<xref linkend="guc-autovacuum-naptime"> seconds.
</para>
<para>
@ -494,11 +494,11 @@ HINT: Stop the postmaster and use a standalone backend to VACUUM in "mydb".
and <command>ANALYZE</> work to do takes too long to run, the deadline may
be failed to meet for other databases. Also, if a particular database
takes long to process, more than one worker may be processing it
simultaneously. The workers are smart enough to avoid repeating work that
other workers have done, so this is normally not a problem. Note that the
number of running workers does not count towards the <xref
linkend="guc-max-connections"> nor the <xref
linkend="guc-superuser-reserved-connections"> limits.
simultaneously. The workers are smart enough to avoid repeating work that
other workers have done, so this is normally not a problem. Note that the
number of running workers does not count towards the <xref
linkend="guc-max-connections"> nor the <xref
linkend="guc-superuser-reserved-connections"> limits.
</para>
<para>