Silence another gcc 11 warning.

Per buildfarm and local experimentation, bleeding-edge gcc isn't
convinced that the MemSet in reorder_function_arguments() is safe.
Shut it up by adding an explicit check that pronargs isn't negative,
and by changing MemSet to memset.  (It appears that either change is
enough to quiet the warning at -O2, but let's do both to be sure.)

This back-patches commit 1046dbedd into out-of-support branches,
pursuant to newly-established project policy.  The point is to
suppress scary-looking warnings so that people building these
branches needn't expend brain cells verifying that it's safe
to ignore the warnings.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d0316012-ece7-7b7e-2d36-9c38cb77cb3b@enterprisedb.com
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane 2021-12-13 00:08:27 -05:00
parent 25c8e5ef07
commit 0af208402d
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -3982,9 +3982,9 @@ reorder_function_arguments(List *args, HeapTuple func_tuple)
int i;
Assert(nargsprovided <= pronargs);
if (pronargs > FUNC_MAX_ARGS)
if (pronargs < 0 || pronargs > FUNC_MAX_ARGS)
elog(ERROR, "too many function arguments");
MemSet(argarray, 0, pronargs * sizeof(Node *));
memset(argarray, 0, pronargs * sizeof(Node *));
/* Deconstruct the argument list into an array indexed by argnumber */
i = 0;