Silence another gcc 11 warning.
Per buildfarm and local experimentation, bleeding-edge gcc isn't
convinced that the MemSet in reorder_function_arguments() is safe.
Shut it up by adding an explicit check that pronargs isn't negative,
and by changing MemSet to memset. (It appears that either change is
enough to quiet the warning at -O2, but let's do both to be sure.)
This back-patches commit 1046dbedd
into out-of-support branches,
pursuant to newly-established project policy. The point is to
suppress scary-looking warnings so that people building these
branches needn't expend brain cells verifying that it's safe
to ignore the warnings.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d0316012-ece7-7b7e-2d36-9c38cb77cb3b@enterprisedb.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
25c8e5ef07
commit
0af208402d
|
@ -3982,9 +3982,9 @@ reorder_function_arguments(List *args, HeapTuple func_tuple)
|
|||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
Assert(nargsprovided <= pronargs);
|
||||
if (pronargs > FUNC_MAX_ARGS)
|
||||
if (pronargs < 0 || pronargs > FUNC_MAX_ARGS)
|
||||
elog(ERROR, "too many function arguments");
|
||||
MemSet(argarray, 0, pronargs * sizeof(Node *));
|
||||
memset(argarray, 0, pronargs * sizeof(Node *));
|
||||
|
||||
/* Deconstruct the argument list into an array indexed by argnumber */
|
||||
i = 0;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue