Make ecpg's rjulmdy() and rmdyjul() agree with their declarations.

We had "short *mdy" in the extern declarations, but "short mdy[3]"
in the actual function definitions.  Per C99 these are equivalent,
but recent versions of gcc have started to issue warnings about
the inconsistency.  Clean it up before the warnings get any more
widespread.

Back-patch, in case anyone wants to build older PG versions with
bleeding-edge compilers.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2401575.1611764534@sss.pgh.pa.us
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane 2021-01-28 11:17:13 -05:00
parent ef2a83323c
commit 1449770d31

View File

@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ rtoday(date * d)
} }
int int
rjulmdy(date d, short mdy[3]) rjulmdy(date d, short *mdy)
{ {
int mdy_int[3]; int mdy_int[3];
@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ rfmtdate(date d, const char *fmt, char *str)
} }
int int
rmdyjul(short mdy[3], date * d) rmdyjul(short *mdy, date * d)
{ {
int mdy_int[3]; int mdy_int[3];