Make ecpg's rjulmdy() and rmdyjul() agree with their declarations.

We had "short *mdy" in the extern declarations, but "short mdy[3]"
in the actual function definitions.  Per C99 these are equivalent,
but recent versions of gcc have started to issue warnings about
the inconsistency.  Clean it up before the warnings get any more
widespread.

Back-patch, in case anyone wants to build older PG versions with
bleeding-edge compilers.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2401575.1611764534@sss.pgh.pa.us
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane 2021-01-28 11:17:13 -05:00
parent 6819b9042f
commit 1b242f42ba
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ rtoday(date * d)
}
int
rjulmdy(date d, short mdy[3])
rjulmdy(date d, short *mdy)
{
int mdy_int[3];
@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ rfmtdate(date d, const char *fmt, char *str)
}
int
rmdyjul(short mdy[3], date * d)
rmdyjul(short *mdy, date * d)
{
int mdy_int[3];