Improve documentation about function volatility: mention the snapshot

visibility effects in a couple of places where people are likely to look
for it.  Per discussion of recent question from Karl Nack.
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane 2009-05-27 01:18:06 +00:00
parent 48938ab506
commit 253ff58a1d
2 changed files with 44 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/trigger.sgml,v 1.55 2009/04/07 04:02:41 momjian Exp $ -->
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/trigger.sgml,v 1.56 2009/05/27 01:18:06 tgl Exp $ -->
<chapter id="triggers">
<title>Triggers</title>
@ -249,6 +249,14 @@
</itemizedlist>
</para>
<para>
If your trigger function is written in any of the standard procedural
languages, then the above statements apply only if the function is
declared <literal>VOLATILE</>. Functions that are declared
<literal>STABLE</> or <literal>IMMUTABLE</> will not see changes made by
the calling command in any case.
</para>
<para>
Further information about data visibility rules can be found in
<xref linkend="spi-visibility">. The example in <xref

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/xfunc.sgml,v 1.137 2009/04/27 16:27:36 momjian Exp $ -->
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/xfunc.sgml,v 1.138 2009/05/27 01:18:06 tgl Exp $ -->
<sect1 id="xfunc">
<title>User-Defined Functions</title>
@ -1177,6 +1177,12 @@ CREATE FUNCTION test(int, int) RETURNS int
<literal>timeofday()</>.
</para>
<para>
Another important example is that the <function>current_timestamp</>
family of functions qualify as <literal>STABLE</>, since their values do
not change within a transaction.
</para>
<para>
There is relatively little difference between <literal>STABLE</> and
<literal>IMMUTABLE</> categories when considering simple interactive
@ -1192,16 +1198,35 @@ CREATE FUNCTION test(int, int) RETURNS int
</para>
<para>
Because of the snapshotting behavior of MVCC (see <xref linkend="mvcc">)
For functions written in SQL or in any of the standard procedural
languages, there is a second important property determined by the
volatility category, namely the visibility of any data changes that have
been made by the SQL command that is calling the function. A
<literal>VOLATILE</> function will see such changes, a <literal>STABLE</>
or <literal>IMMUTABLE</> function will not. This behavior is implemented
using the snapshotting behavior of MVCC (see <xref linkend="mvcc">):
<literal>STABLE</> and <literal>IMMUTABLE</> functions use a snapshot
established as of the start of the calling query, whereas
<literal>VOLATILE</> functions obtain a fresh snapshot at the start of
each query they execute.
</para>
<note>
<para>
Functions written in C can manage snapshots however they want, but it's
usually a good idea to make C functions work this way too.
</para>
</note>
<para>
Because of this snapshotting behavior,
a function containing only <command>SELECT</> commands can safely be
marked <literal>STABLE</>, even if it selects from tables that might be
undergoing modifications by concurrent queries.
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> will execute a <literal>STABLE</>
function using the snapshot established for the calling query, and so it
will see a fixed view of the database throughout that query.
Also note
that the <function>current_timestamp</> family of functions qualify
as stable, since their values do not change within a transaction.
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> will execute all commands of a
<literal>STABLE</> function using the snapshot established for the
calling query, and so it will see a fixed view of the database throughout
that query.
</para>
<para>
@ -1225,14 +1250,14 @@ CREATE FUNCTION test(int, int) RETURNS int
<para>
Before <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> release 8.0, the requirement
that <literal>STABLE</> and <literal>IMMUTABLE</> functions cannot modify
the database was not enforced by the system. Release 8.0 enforces it
the database was not enforced by the system. Releases 8.0 and later enforce it
by requiring SQL functions and procedural language functions of these
categories to contain no SQL commands other than <command>SELECT</>.
(This is not a completely bulletproof test, since such functions could
still call <literal>VOLATILE</> functions that modify the database.
If you do that, you will find that the <literal>STABLE</> or
<literal>IMMUTABLE</> function does not notice the database changes
applied by the called function.)
applied by the called function, since they are hidden from its snapshot.)
</para>
</note>
</sect1>