Re-Align *_freeze_max_age reloption limits with corresponding GUC limits.
In020235a575
I lowered the autovacuum_*freeze_max_age minimums to allow for easier testing of wraparounds. I did not touch the corresponding per-table limits. While those don't matter for the purpose of wraparound, it seems more consistent to lower them as well. It's noteworthy that the previous reloption lower limit for autovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age was too high by one magnitude, even before020235a575
. Discussion: 26377.1443105453@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch: back to 9.0 (in parts), like the prior patch
This commit is contained in:
parent
088c83363a
commit
2596d705bd
|
@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ static relopt_int intRelOpts[] =
|
|||
RELOPT_KIND_HEAP | RELOPT_KIND_TOAST,
|
||||
ShareUpdateExclusiveLock
|
||||
},
|
||||
-1, 100000000, 2000000000
|
||||
-1, 100000, 2000000000
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static relopt_int intRelOpts[] =
|
|||
RELOPT_KIND_HEAP | RELOPT_KIND_TOAST,
|
||||
ShareUpdateExclusiveLock
|
||||
},
|
||||
-1, 100000000, 2000000000
|
||||
-1, 10000, 2000000000
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue