Fix regression in parallel planning against inheritance tables.

Commit 51ee6f3160 accidentally changed
the behavior around inheritance hierarchies; before, we always
considered parallel paths even for very small inheritance children,
because otherwise an inheritance hierarchy with even one small child
wouldn't be eligible for parallelism.  That exception was inadverently
removed; put it back.

In passing, also adjust the degree-of-parallelism comptuation for
index-only scans not to consider the number of heap pages fetched.
Otherwise, we'll avoid parallel index-only scans on tables that are
mostly all-visible, which isn't especially logical.

Robert Haas and Amit Kapila, per a report from Ashutosh Sharma.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAE9k0PmgSoOHRd60SHu09aRVTHRSs8s6pmyhJKWHxWw9C_x+XA@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
Robert Haas 2017-03-14 14:33:14 -04:00
parent c11453ce0a
commit 2609e91fcf
3 changed files with 36 additions and 25 deletions

View File

@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ create_plain_partial_paths(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel)
{
int parallel_workers;
parallel_workers = compute_parallel_worker(rel, rel->pages, 0);
parallel_workers = compute_parallel_worker(rel, rel->pages, -1);
/* If any limit was set to zero, the user doesn't want a parallel scan. */
if (parallel_workers <= 0)
@ -2938,7 +2938,7 @@ create_partial_bitmap_paths(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel,
pages_fetched = compute_bitmap_pages(root, rel, bitmapqual, 1.0,
NULL, NULL);
parallel_workers = compute_parallel_worker(rel, pages_fetched, 0);
parallel_workers = compute_parallel_worker(rel, pages_fetched, -1);
if (parallel_workers <= 0)
return;
@ -2953,16 +2953,16 @@ create_partial_bitmap_paths(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel,
* be scanned and the size of the index to be scanned, then choose a minimum
* of those.
*
* "heap_pages" is the number of pages from the table that we expect to scan.
* "index_pages" is the number of pages from the index that we expect to scan.
* "heap_pages" is the number of pages from the table that we expect to scan, or
* -1 if we don't expect to scan any.
*
* "index_pages" is the number of pages from the index that we expect to scan, or
* -1 if we don't expect to scan any.
*/
int
compute_parallel_worker(RelOptInfo *rel, BlockNumber heap_pages,
BlockNumber index_pages)
compute_parallel_worker(RelOptInfo *rel, double heap_pages, double index_pages)
{
int parallel_workers = 0;
int heap_parallel_workers = 1;
int index_parallel_workers = 1;
/*
* If the user has set the parallel_workers reloption, use that; otherwise
@ -2972,23 +2972,24 @@ compute_parallel_worker(RelOptInfo *rel, BlockNumber heap_pages,
parallel_workers = rel->rel_parallel_workers;
else
{
int heap_parallel_threshold;
int index_parallel_threshold;
/*
* If this relation is too small to be worth a parallel scan, just
* return without doing anything ... unless it's an inheritance child.
* In that case, we want to generate a parallel path here anyway. It
* might not be worthwhile just for this relation, but when combined
* with all of its inheritance siblings it may well pay off.
* If the number of pages being scanned is insufficient to justify a
* parallel scan, just return zero ... unless it's an inheritance
* child. In that case, we want to generate a parallel path here
* anyway. It might not be worthwhile just for this relation, but
* when combined with all of its inheritance siblings it may well pay
* off.
*/
if (heap_pages < (BlockNumber) min_parallel_table_scan_size &&
index_pages < (BlockNumber) min_parallel_index_scan_size &&
rel->reloptkind == RELOPT_BASEREL)
if (rel->reloptkind == RELOPT_BASEREL &&
((heap_pages >= 0 && heap_pages < min_parallel_table_scan_size) ||
(index_pages >= 0 && index_pages < min_parallel_index_scan_size)))
return 0;
if (heap_pages > 0)
if (heap_pages >= 0)
{
int heap_parallel_threshold;
int heap_parallel_workers = 1;
/*
* Select the number of workers based on the log of the size of
* the relation. This probably needs to be a good deal more
@ -3008,8 +3009,11 @@ compute_parallel_worker(RelOptInfo *rel, BlockNumber heap_pages,
parallel_workers = heap_parallel_workers;
}
if (index_pages > 0)
if (index_pages >= 0)
{
int index_parallel_workers = 1;
int index_parallel_threshold;
/* same calculation as for heap_pages above */
index_parallel_threshold = Max(min_parallel_index_scan_size, 1);
while (index_pages >= (BlockNumber) (index_parallel_threshold * 3))

View File

@ -662,6 +662,14 @@ cost_index(IndexPath *path, PlannerInfo *root, double loop_count,
if (partial_path)
{
/*
* For index only scans compute workers based on number of index pages
* fetched; the number of heap pages we fetch might be so small as
* to effectively rule out parallelism, which we don't want to do.
*/
if (indexonly)
rand_heap_pages = -1;
/*
* Estimate the number of parallel workers required to scan index. Use
* the number of heap pages computed considering heap fetches won't be
@ -669,8 +677,7 @@ cost_index(IndexPath *path, PlannerInfo *root, double loop_count,
* order.
*/
path->path.parallel_workers = compute_parallel_worker(baserel,
(BlockNumber) rand_heap_pages,
(BlockNumber) index_pages);
rand_heap_pages, index_pages);
/*
* Fall out if workers can't be assigned for parallel scan, because in

View File

@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ extern RelOptInfo *standard_join_search(PlannerInfo *root, int levels_needed,
List *initial_rels);
extern void generate_gather_paths(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel);
extern int compute_parallel_worker(RelOptInfo *rel, BlockNumber heap_pages,
BlockNumber index_pages);
extern int compute_parallel_worker(RelOptInfo *rel, double heap_pages,
double index_pages);
extern void create_partial_bitmap_paths(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel,
Path *bitmapqual);