Make ecpg's rjulmdy() and rmdyjul() agree with their declarations.
We had "short *mdy" in the extern declarations, but "short mdy[3]" in the actual function definitions. Per C99 these are equivalent, but recent versions of gcc have started to issue warnings about the inconsistency. Clean it up before the warnings get any more widespread. Back-patch, in case anyone wants to build older PG versions with bleeding-edge compilers. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2401575.1611764534@sss.pgh.pa.us
This commit is contained in:
parent
cfbbc1f17c
commit
27c79a46aa
|
@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ rtoday(date * d)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
rjulmdy(date d, short mdy[3])
|
||||
rjulmdy(date d, short *mdy)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int mdy_int[3];
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ rfmtdate(date d, char *fmt, char *str)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
rmdyjul(short mdy[3], date * d)
|
||||
rmdyjul(short *mdy, date * d)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int mdy_int[3];
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue