Fix bogus comment that claimed that the new BACKUP METHOD line in

backup_label was new in 9.0. Spotted by Fujii Masao.
This commit is contained in:
Heikki Linnakangas 2011-08-16 12:21:50 +03:00
parent 3b3f09351b
commit 2877c67bc2

View File

@ -9826,9 +9826,9 @@ read_backup_label(XLogRecPtr *checkPointLoc, bool *backupEndRequired)
(errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
errmsg("invalid data in file \"%s\"", BACKUP_LABEL_FILE)));
/*
* BACKUP METHOD line is new in 9.0. Don't complain if it doesn't exist,
* in case you're restoring from a backup taken with an 9.0 beta version
* that didn't emit it.
* BACKUP METHOD line is new in 9.2. We can't restore from an older backup
* anyway, but since the information on it is not strictly required, don't
* error out if it's missing for some reason.
*/
if (fscanf(lfp, "BACKUP METHOD: %19s", backuptype) == 1)
{