From 2877c67bc24510c30bca477c876f5de427c85588 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heikki Linnakangas Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:21:50 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Fix bogus comment that claimed that the new BACKUP METHOD line in backup_label was new in 9.0. Spotted by Fujii Masao. --- src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c index 11035e6b4c..a462288a9c 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c @@ -9826,9 +9826,9 @@ read_backup_label(XLogRecPtr *checkPointLoc, bool *backupEndRequired) (errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE), errmsg("invalid data in file \"%s\"", BACKUP_LABEL_FILE))); /* - * BACKUP METHOD line is new in 9.0. Don't complain if it doesn't exist, - * in case you're restoring from a backup taken with an 9.0 beta version - * that didn't emit it. + * BACKUP METHOD line is new in 9.2. We can't restore from an older backup + * anyway, but since the information on it is not strictly required, don't + * error out if it's missing for some reason. */ if (fscanf(lfp, "BACKUP METHOD: %19s", backuptype) == 1) {