Invert and rename flag variable to improve code readability.

No change in functionality.  Per discussion with Robert.
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane 2010-12-31 11:59:38 -05:00
parent 7b46401557
commit 39c8dd6620
1 changed files with 24 additions and 23 deletions

View File

@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static List *select_mergejoin_clauses(PlannerInfo *root,
RelOptInfo *innerrel,
List *restrictlist,
JoinType jointype,
bool *have_nonmergeable_clause);
bool *mergejoin_allowed);
/*
@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root,
List *restrictlist)
{
List *mergeclause_list = NIL;
bool have_nonmergeable_clause = false;
bool mergejoin_allowed = true;
/*
* Find potential mergejoin clauses. We can skip this if we are not
@ -93,13 +93,13 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root,
innerrel,
restrictlist,
jointype,
&have_nonmergeable_clause);
&mergejoin_allowed);
/*
* 1. Consider mergejoin paths where both relations must be explicitly
* sorted. Skip this if we can't mergejoin.
*/
if (!have_nonmergeable_clause)
if (mergejoin_allowed)
sort_inner_and_outer(root, joinrel, outerrel, innerrel,
restrictlist, mergeclause_list, jointype, sjinfo);
@ -108,9 +108,9 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root,
* sorted. This includes both nestloops and mergejoins where the outer
* path is already ordered. Again, skip this if we can't mergejoin.
* (That's okay because we know that nestloop can't handle right/full
* joins at all, so it wouldn't work in those cases either.)
* joins at all, so it wouldn't work in the prohibited cases either.)
*/
if (!have_nonmergeable_clause)
if (mergejoin_allowed)
match_unsorted_outer(root, joinrel, outerrel, innerrel,
restrictlist, mergeclause_list, jointype, sjinfo);
@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root,
* those made by match_unsorted_outer when add_paths_to_joinrel() is
* invoked with the two rels given in the other order.
*/
if (!have_nonmergeable_clause)
if (mergejoin_allowed)
match_unsorted_inner(root, joinrel, outerrel, innerrel,
restrictlist, mergeclause_list, jointype, sjinfo);
#endif
@ -927,10 +927,14 @@ best_appendrel_indexscan(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel,
* Select mergejoin clauses that are usable for a particular join.
* Returns a list of RestrictInfo nodes for those clauses.
*
* *have_nonmergeable_clause is set TRUE if this is a right/full join and
* there are nonmergejoinable join clauses. The executor's mergejoin
* machinery cannot handle such cases, so we have to avoid generating a
* mergejoin plan.
* *mergejoin_allowed is normally set to TRUE, but it is set to FALSE if
* this is a right/full join and there are nonmergejoinable join clauses.
* The executor's mergejoin machinery cannot handle such cases, so we have
* to avoid generating a mergejoin plan. (Note that this flag does NOT
* consider whether there are actually any mergejoinable clauses. This is
* correct because in some cases we need to build a clauseless mergejoin.
* Simply returning NIL is therefore not enough to distinguish safe from
* unsafe cases.)
*
* We also mark each selected RestrictInfo to show which side is currently
* being considered as outer. These are transient markings that are only
@ -947,14 +951,13 @@ select_mergejoin_clauses(PlannerInfo *root,
RelOptInfo *innerrel,
List *restrictlist,
JoinType jointype,
bool *have_nonmergeable_clause)
bool *mergejoin_allowed)
{
List *result_list = NIL;
bool isouterjoin = IS_OUTER_JOIN(jointype);
bool have_nonmergeable_joinclause = false;
ListCell *l;
*have_nonmergeable_clause = false;
foreach(l, restrictlist)
{
RestrictInfo *restrictinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(l);
@ -962,7 +965,7 @@ select_mergejoin_clauses(PlannerInfo *root,
/*
* If processing an outer join, only use its own join clauses in the
* merge. For inner joins we can use pushed-down clauses too. (Note:
* we don't set have_nonmergeable_clause here because pushed-down
* we don't set have_nonmergeable_joinclause here because pushed-down
* clauses will become otherquals not joinquals.)
*/
if (isouterjoin && restrictinfo->is_pushed_down)
@ -979,7 +982,7 @@ select_mergejoin_clauses(PlannerInfo *root,
* FALSE.)
*/
if (!restrictinfo->clause || !IsA(restrictinfo->clause, Const))
*have_nonmergeable_clause = true;
have_nonmergeable_joinclause = true;
continue; /* not mergejoinable */
}
@ -988,7 +991,7 @@ select_mergejoin_clauses(PlannerInfo *root,
*/
if (!clause_sides_match_join(restrictinfo, outerrel, innerrel))
{
*have_nonmergeable_clause = true;
have_nonmergeable_joinclause = true;
continue; /* no good for these input relations */
}
@ -1017,7 +1020,7 @@ select_mergejoin_clauses(PlannerInfo *root,
if (EC_MUST_BE_REDUNDANT(restrictinfo->left_ec) ||
EC_MUST_BE_REDUNDANT(restrictinfo->right_ec))
{
*have_nonmergeable_clause = true;
have_nonmergeable_joinclause = true;
continue; /* can't handle redundant eclasses */
}
@ -1025,18 +1028,16 @@ select_mergejoin_clauses(PlannerInfo *root,
}
/*
* If it is not a right/full join then we don't need to insist on all the
* joinclauses being mergejoinable, so reset the flag. This simplifies
* the logic in add_paths_to_joinrel.
* Report whether mergejoin is allowed (see comment at top of function).
*/
switch (jointype)
{
case JOIN_RIGHT:
case JOIN_FULL:
*mergejoin_allowed = !have_nonmergeable_joinclause;
break;
default:
/* otherwise, it's OK to have nonmergeable join quals */
*have_nonmergeable_clause = false;
*mergejoin_allowed = true;
break;
}