Fix incorrect varlevelsup in security_barrier_replace_vars().

When converting an RTE with securityQuals into a security barrier
subquery RTE, ensure that the Vars in the new subquery's targetlist
all have varlevelsup = 0 so that they correctly refer to the
underlying base relation being wrapped.

The original code was creating new Vars by copying them from existing
Vars referencing the base relation found elsewhere in the query, but
failed to account for the fact that such Vars could come from sublink
subqueries, and hence have varlevelsup > 0. In practice it looks like
this could only happen with nested security barrier views, where the
outer view has a WHERE clause containing a correlated subquery, due to
the order in which the Vars are processed.

Bug: #13988
Reported-by: Adam Guthrie
Backpatch-to: 9.4, where updatable SB views were introduced
This commit is contained in:
Dean Rasheed 2016-02-29 12:28:06 +00:00
parent 907e4dd2b1
commit 41fedc2462
3 changed files with 74 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -446,6 +446,7 @@ security_barrier_replace_vars_walker(Node *node,
/* New variable for subquery targetlist */
newvar = copyObject(var);
newvar->varno = newvar->varnoold = 1;
newvar->varlevelsup = 0;
attno = list_length(context->targetlist) + 1;
tle = makeTargetEntry((Expr *) newvar,

View File

@ -2420,3 +2420,42 @@ DROP VIEW vx1;
DROP TABLE tx1;
DROP TABLE tx2;
DROP TABLE tx3;
--
-- Test handling of vars from correlated subqueries in quals from outer
-- security barrier views, per bug #13988
--
CREATE TABLE t1 (a int, b text, c int);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1, 'one', 10);
CREATE TABLE t2 (cc int);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (10), (20);
CREATE VIEW v1 WITH (security_barrier = true) AS
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE (a > 0)
WITH CHECK OPTION;
CREATE VIEW v2 WITH (security_barrier = true) AS
SELECT * FROM v1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM t2 WHERE t2.cc = v1.c)
WITH CHECK OPTION;
INSERT INTO v2 VALUES (2, 'two', 20); -- ok
INSERT INTO v2 VALUES (-2, 'minus two', 20); -- not allowed
ERROR: new row violates check option for view "v1"
DETAIL: Failing row contains (-2, minus two, 20).
INSERT INTO v2 VALUES (3, 'three', 30); -- not allowed
ERROR: new row violates check option for view "v2"
DETAIL: Failing row contains (3, three, 30).
UPDATE v2 SET b = 'ONE' WHERE a = 1; -- ok
UPDATE v2 SET a = -1 WHERE a = 1; -- not allowed
ERROR: new row violates check option for view "v1"
DETAIL: Failing row contains (-1, ONE, 10).
UPDATE v2 SET c = 30 WHERE a = 1; -- not allowed
ERROR: new row violates check option for view "v2"
DETAIL: Failing row contains (1, ONE, 30).
DELETE FROM v2 WHERE a = 2; -- ok
SELECT * FROM v2;
a | b | c
---+-----+----
1 | ONE | 10
(1 row)
DROP VIEW v2;
DROP VIEW v1;
DROP TABLE t2;
DROP TABLE t1;

View File

@ -1064,3 +1064,37 @@ DROP VIEW vx1;
DROP TABLE tx1;
DROP TABLE tx2;
DROP TABLE tx3;
--
-- Test handling of vars from correlated subqueries in quals from outer
-- security barrier views, per bug #13988
--
CREATE TABLE t1 (a int, b text, c int);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1, 'one', 10);
CREATE TABLE t2 (cc int);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (10), (20);
CREATE VIEW v1 WITH (security_barrier = true) AS
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE (a > 0)
WITH CHECK OPTION;
CREATE VIEW v2 WITH (security_barrier = true) AS
SELECT * FROM v1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM t2 WHERE t2.cc = v1.c)
WITH CHECK OPTION;
INSERT INTO v2 VALUES (2, 'two', 20); -- ok
INSERT INTO v2 VALUES (-2, 'minus two', 20); -- not allowed
INSERT INTO v2 VALUES (3, 'three', 30); -- not allowed
UPDATE v2 SET b = 'ONE' WHERE a = 1; -- ok
UPDATE v2 SET a = -1 WHERE a = 1; -- not allowed
UPDATE v2 SET c = 30 WHERE a = 1; -- not allowed
DELETE FROM v2 WHERE a = 2; -- ok
SELECT * FROM v2;
DROP VIEW v2;
DROP VIEW v1;
DROP TABLE t2;
DROP TABLE t1;