From 4a1ae21750cbf23d8317d565c55ac7bce46bf0f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Amit Kapila Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 07:54:04 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] Fix minor typo in nodeIncrementalSort.c. Author: Vignesh C Reviewed-by: James Coleman Backpatch-through: 13, where it was introduced Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm0WjZqRvdeL59ZfYH0o4mLbKQ23jm-bnjXcFzgpANx55g@mail.gmail.com --- src/backend/executor/nodeIncrementalSort.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeIncrementalSort.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeIncrementalSort.c index e056469448..6c0d24ee25 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeIncrementalSort.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeIncrementalSort.c @@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ * into the second mode if we believe it's beneficial. * * Sorting incrementally can potentially use less memory, avoid fetching - * and sorting all tuples in the the dataset, and begin returning tuples - * before the entire result set is available. + * and sorting all tuples in the dataset, and begin returning tuples before + * the entire result set is available. * * The hybrid mode approach allows us to optimize for both very small * groups (where the overhead of a new tuplesort is high) and very large