From 4b5e58b86e3b09daa7384dbbd0bb4cacbd9bd7c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bruce Momjian Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:54:04 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] doc: fix plurality typo on bgwriter doc sentence Reported-by: matthew.alton@gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/157204060717.1042.8194076510523669244@wrigleys.postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 9.4 --- doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml index bc5a52584b..ad17b42c89 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ There are considerable robustness and security risks in using background worker processes because, being written in the C language, they have unrestricted access to data. Administrators wishing to enable - modules that include background worker process should exercise extreme + modules that include background worker processes should exercise extreme caution. Only carefully audited modules should be permitted to run background worker processes.