From 4d616b112704411ff059321c76f438691f0f2ae8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bruce Momjian Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:29:02 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] doc: fix for plurality typo on bgwriter doc sentence Reported-by: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191106022353.GX4999@telsasoft.com Backpatch-through: 11, 12 --- doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml index 2bfc6eb943..ad17b42c89 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ There are considerable robustness and security risks in using background worker processes because, being written in the C language, they have unrestricted access to data. Administrators wishing to enable - modules that include background worker processs should exercise extreme + modules that include background worker processes should exercise extreme caution. Only carefully audited modules should be permitted to run background worker processes.