diff --git a/src/backend/access/hash/hash_xlog.c b/src/backend/access/hash/hash_xlog.c index d7b7098110..c7f6af4a4c 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/hash/hash_xlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/hash/hash_xlog.c @@ -352,11 +352,10 @@ hash_xlog_split_allocate_page(XLogReaderState *record) } /* replay the record for new bucket */ - newbuf = XLogInitBufferForRedo(record, 1); + XLogReadBufferForRedoExtended(record, 1, RBM_ZERO_AND_CLEANUP_LOCK, true, + &newbuf); _hash_initbuf(newbuf, xlrec->new_bucket, xlrec->new_bucket, xlrec->new_bucket_flag, true); - if (!IsBufferCleanupOK(newbuf)) - elog(PANIC, "hash_xlog_split_allocate_page: failed to acquire cleanup lock"); MarkBufferDirty(newbuf); PageSetLSN(BufferGetPage(newbuf), lsn); diff --git a/src/backend/access/hash/hashpage.c b/src/backend/access/hash/hashpage.c index 376ee2a63b..11f21db992 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/hash/hashpage.c +++ b/src/backend/access/hash/hashpage.c @@ -807,9 +807,13 @@ restart_expand: /* * Physically allocate the new bucket's primary page. We want to do this * before changing the metapage's mapping info, in case we can't get the - * disk space. Ideally, we don't need to check for cleanup lock on new - * bucket as no other backend could find this bucket unless meta page is - * updated. However, it is good to be consistent with old bucket locking. + * disk space. + * + * XXX It doesn't make sense to call _hash_getnewbuf first, zeroing the + * buffer, and then only afterwards check whether we have a cleanup lock. + * However, since no scan can be accessing the buffer yet, any concurrent + * accesses will just be from processes like the bgwriter or checkpointer + * which don't care about its contents, so it doesn't really matter. */ buf_nblkno = _hash_getnewbuf(rel, start_nblkno, MAIN_FORKNUM); if (!IsBufferCleanupOK(buf_nblkno))