Unbreak legacy syntax "COMMENT ON RULE x IS y", with no relation name.
check_object_ownership() isn't happy about the null relation pointer. We could fix it there, but this seems more future-proof.
This commit is contained in:
parent
59414cdedb
commit
5057366eed
|
@ -498,6 +498,12 @@ get_object_address_relobject(ObjectType objtype, List *objname,
|
|||
address.objectId =
|
||||
get_rewrite_oid_without_relid(depname, &reloid, missing_ok);
|
||||
address.objectSubId = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Caller is expecting to get back the relation, even though we
|
||||
* didn't end up using it to find the rule.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
relation = heap_open(reloid, AccessShareLock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue