From 531ead8ab46732dbf8416f09e9b276b4dc1a522f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Lane Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:06:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Adjust error message to agree with documentation. The tsearch documentation uniformly calls these things weights, not classes. --- src/backend/utils/adt/tsginidx.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/tsginidx.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/tsginidx.c index ba4a10313c..075c921d40 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/tsginidx.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/tsginidx.c @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ * * * IDENTIFICATION - * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/tsginidx.c,v 1.4 2007/09/11 08:46:29 teodor Exp $ + * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/tsginidx.c,v 1.5 2007/10/20 21:06:20 tgl Exp $ * *------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ gin_extract_query(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) if (strategy != TSearchWithClassStrategyNumber && val->weight != 0) ereport(ERROR, (errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED), - errmsg("@@ operator does not support lexeme class restrictions"), + errmsg("@@ operator does not support lexeme weight restrictions in GIN index searches"), errhint("Use the @@@ operator instead."))); } }