Applied doc patch to jdbc doc which documents support for datasources

patch submitted by ammulder@alumni.princeton.edu

 Modified Files:
 	jdbc.sgml
This commit is contained in:
Barry Lind 2002-10-01 04:09:13 +00:00
parent 04957acd91
commit 5aa14def55
1 changed files with 441 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
<!--
$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/Attic/jdbc.sgml,v 1.38 2002/09/21 18:32:53 petere Exp $
$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/Attic/jdbc.sgml,v 1.39 2002/10/01 04:09:13 barry Exp $
-->
<chapter id="jdbc">
@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ db.close();
</para>
<example id="jdbc-query-example">
<title>Processing a Simple Query in <acronym>JDCB</acronym></title>
<title>Processing a Simple Query in <acronym>JDBC</acronym></title>
<para>
This example will issue a simple query and print out the first
@ -2506,6 +2506,445 @@ public void unlink(int oid) throws SQLException
</para>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="jdbc-datasource">
<title>Connection Pools And DataSources</title>
<sect2 id="jdbc-ds-version">
<title>JDBC, JDK Version Support</title>
<para>
JDBC 2 introduced standard connection pooling features in an
add-on API known as the <acronym>JDBC</acronym> 2.0 Optional
Package (also known as the <acronym>JDBC</acronym> 2.0
Standard Extension). These features have since been included in
the core JDBC 3 API. The <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>
<acronym>JDBC</acronym> drivers support these features with
<acronym>JDK</acronym> 1.3.x in combination with the
<acronym>JDBC</acronym> 2.0 Optional Package
(<acronym>JDBC</acronym> 2), or with <acronym>JDK</acronym> 1.4+
(<acronym>JDBC</acronym> 3). Most application servers include
the <acronym>JDBC</acronym> 2.0 Optional Package, but it is
also available separately from the Sun
<ulink
url="http://java.sun.com/products/jdbc/download.html#spec"><acronym>JDBC</acronym> download site</ulink>.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2 id="jdbc-ds-intro">
<title>JDBC Connection Pooling API</title>
<para>The <acronym>JDBC</acronym> API provides a client
and a server interface for connection pooling. The client
interface is <literal>javax.sql.DataSource</literal>,
which is what application code will typically use to
acquire a pooled database connection. The server interface
is <literal>javax.sql.ConnectionPoolDataSource</literal>,
which is how most application servers will interface with
the <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> <acronym>JDBC</acronym>
driver.</para>
<para>In an application server environment, the
application server configuration will typically refer to
the <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>
<literal>ConnectionPoolDataSource</literal> implementation,
while the application component code will typically acquire a
<literal>DataSource</literal> implementation provided by
the application server (not by
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname>).</para>
<para>In an environment without an application server,
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> provides two implementations
of <literal>DataSource</literal> which an application can use
directly. One implementation performs connection pooling,
while the other simply provides access to database connections
through the <literal>DataSource</literal> interface without
any pooling. Again, these implementations should not be used
in an application server environment unless the application
server does not support the
<literal>ConnectionPoolDataSource</literal> interface.</para>
</sect2>
<sect2 id="jdbc-ds-cpds">
<title>Application Servers: ConnectionPoolDataSource</title>
<para><productname>PostgreSQL</productname> includes one
implementation of <literal>ConnectionPoolDataSource</literal>
for <acronym>JDBC</acronym> 2, and one for
<acronym>JDBC</acronym> 3:</para>
<table>
<title>ConnectionPoolDataSource Implementations</title>
<tgroup cols=2>
<thead>
<row>
<entry><acronym>JDBC</acronym></entry>
<entry>Implementation Class</entry>
</row>
</thead>
<tbody>
<row>
<entry>2</entry>
<entry><literal>org.postgresql.jdbc2.optional.ConnectionPool</literal></entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry>3</entry>
<entry><literal>org.postgresql.jdbc3.Jdbc3ConnectionPool</literal></entry>
</row>
</tbody>
</tgroup>
</table>
<para>Both implementations use the same configuration scheme.
<acronym>JDBC</acronym> requires that a
<literal>ConnectionPoolDataSource</literal> be configured via
JavaBean properties, so there are get and set methods for each of
these properties:</para>
<table>
<title>ConnectionPoolDataSource Configuration Properties</title>
<tgroup cols=3>
<thead>
<row>
<entry>Property</entry>
<entry>Type</entry>
<entry>Description</entry>
</row>
</thead>
<tbody>
<row>
<entry>serverName</entry>
<entry><literal>String</literal></entry>
<entry><productname>PostgreSQL</productname> database server
hostname</entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry>databaseName</entry>
<entry><literal>String</literal></entry>
<entry><productname>PostgreSQL</productname> database name</entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry>portNumber</entry>
<entry><literal>int</literal></entry>
<entry><acronym>TCP/IP</acronym> port which the
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> database server is
listening on (or 0 to use the default port)</entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry>user</entry>
<entry><literal>String</literal></entry>
<entry>User used to make database connections</entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry>password</entry>
<entry><literal>String</literal></entry>
<entry>Password used to make database connections</entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry>defaultAutoCommit</entry>
<entry><literal>boolean</literal></entry>
<entry>Whether connections should have autoCommit
enabled or disabled when they are supplied to the
caller. The default is <literal>false</literal>, to
disable autoCommit.</entry>
</row>
</tbody>
</tgroup>
</table>
<para>Many application servers use a properties-style syntax to
configure these properties, so it would not be unusual to
enter properties as a block of text.</para>
<example id="jdbc-cpds-config">
<title><literal>ConnectionPoolDataSource</literal> Configuration Example</title>
<para>
If the application server provides a single area to enter all
the properties, they might be listed like this:
<programlisting>
serverName=localhost
databaseName=test
user=testuser
password=testpassword
</programlisting>
Or, separated by semicolons instead of newlines, like this:
<programlisting>
serverName=localhost;databaseName=test;user=testuser;password=testpassword
</programlisting>
</para>
</example>
</sect2>
<sect2 id="jdbc-ds-ds">
<title>Applications: DataSource</title>
<para><productname>PostgreSQL</productname> includes two
implementations of <literal>DataSource</literal>
for <acronym>JDBC</acronym> 2, and two for <acronym>JDBC</acronym>
3. The pooling implementations do not actually close connections
when the client calls the <literal>close</literal> method, but
instead return the connections to a pool of available connections
for other clients to use. This avoids any overhead of repeatedly
opening and closing connections, and allows a large number of
clients to share a small number of database connections.</para>
<para>The pooling datasource implementation provided here is not
the most feature-rich in the world. Among other things,
connections are never closed until the pool itself is closed;
there is no way to shrink the pool. As well, connections
requested for users other than the default configured user are
not pooled. Many application servers
provide more advanced pooling features, and use the
<literal>ConnectionPoolDataSource</literal> implementation
instead.</para>
<table>
<title>DataSource Implementations</title>
<tgroup cols=3>
<thead>
<row>
<entry><acronym>JDBC</acronym></entry>
<entry>Pooling</entry>
<entry>Implementation Class</entry>
</row>
</thead>
<tbody>
<row>
<entry>2</entry>
<entry>No</entry>
<entry><literal>org.postgresql.jdbc2.optional.SimpleDataSource</literal></entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry>2</entry>
<entry>Yes</entry>
<entry><literal>org.postgresql.jdbc2.optional.PoolingDataSource</literal></entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry>3</entry>
<entry>No</entry>
<entry><literal>org.postgresql.jdbc3.Jdbc3SimpleDataSource</literal></entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry>3</entry>
<entry>Yes</entry>
<entry><literal>org.postgresql.jdbc3.Jdbc3PoolingDataSource</literal></entry>
</row>
</tbody>
</tgroup>
</table>
<para>All the implementations use the same configuration scheme.
<acronym>JDBC</acronym> requires that a
<literal>DataSource</literal> be configured via
JavaBean properties, so there are get and set methods for each of
these properties.</para>
<table>
<title>DataSource Configuration Properties</title>
<tgroup cols=3>
<thead>
<row>
<entry>Property</entry>
<entry>Type</entry>
<entry>Description</entry>
</row>
</thead>
<tbody>
<row>
<entry>serverName</entry>
<entry><literal>String</literal></entry>
<entry><productname>PostgreSQL</productname> database server
hostname</entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry>databaseName</entry>
<entry><literal>String</literal></entry>
<entry><productname>PostgreSQL</productname> database name</entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry>portNumber</entry>
<entry><literal>int</literal></entry>
<entry><acronym>TCP/IP</acronym> port which the
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> database server is
listening on (or 0 to use the default port)</entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry>user</entry>
<entry><literal>String</literal></entry>
<entry>User used to make database connections</entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry>password</entry>
<entry><literal>String</literal></entry>
<entry>Password used to make database connections</entry>
</row>
</tbody>
</tgroup>
</table>
<para>The pooling implementations require some additional
configuration properties:</para>
<table>
<title>Additional Pooling DataSource Configuration Properties</title>
<tgroup cols=3>
<thead>
<row>
<entry>Property</entry>
<entry>Type</entry>
<entry>Description</entry>
</row>
</thead>
<tbody>
<row>
<entry>dataSourceName</entry>
<entry><literal>String</literal></entry>
<entry>Every pooling <literal>DataSource</literal> must have a
unique name</entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry>initialConnections</entry>
<entry><literal>int</literal></entry>
<entry>The number of database connections to be created
when the pool is initialized.</entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry>maxConnections</entry>
<entry><literal>int</literal></entry>
<entry>The maximum number of open database connections to
allow. When more connections are requested, the caller
will hang until a connection is returned to the pool.</entry>
</row>
</tbody>
</tgroup>
</table>
<para>Here's an example of typical application code using a
pooling <literal>DataSource</literal>:</para>
<example id="jdbc-ds-code">
<title><literal>DataSource</literal> Code Example</title>
<para>
Code to initialize a pooling DataSource might look like this:
<programlisting>
Jdbc3PoolingDataSource source = new Jdbc3PoolingDataSource();
source.setDataSourceName("A Data Source");
source.setServerName("localhost");
source.setDatabaseName("test");
source.setUser("testuser");
source.setPassword("testpassword");
source.setMaxConnections(10);
</programlisting>
Then code to use a connection from the pool might look
like this. Note that it is critical that the connections
are closed, or else the pool will "leak" connections, and
eventually lock all the clients out.
<programlisting>
Connection con = null;
try {
con = source.getConnection();
// use connection
} catch(SQLException e) {
// log error
} finally {
if(con != null) {
try {con.close();}catch(SQLException e) {}
}
}
</programlisting>
</para>
</example>
</sect2>
<sect2 id="jdbc-jndi">
<title>DataSources and <acronym>JNDI</acronym></title>
<para>All the <literal>ConnectionPoolDataSource</literal> and
<literal>DataSource</literal> implementations can be stored
in <acronym>JNDI</acronym>. In the case of the non-pooling
implementations, a new instance will be created every time the
object is retrieved from <acronym>JNDI</acronym>, with the
same settings as the instance which was stored. For the
pooling implementations, the same instance will be retrieved
as long as it is available (e.g. not a different
<acronym>JVM</acronym> retrieving the pool from
<acronym>JNDI</acronym>), or a new instance with the same
settings created otherwise.</para>
<para>In the application server environment, typically the
application server's <literal>DataSource</literal> instance
will be stored in <acronym>JNDI</acronym>, instead of the
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname>
<literal>ConnectionPoolDataSource</literal> implementation.
</para>
<para>In an application environment, the application may store
the <literal>DataSource</literal> in <acronym>JNDI</acronym>
so that it doesn't have to make a reference to the
<literal>DataSource</literal> available to all application
components that may need to use it:</para>
<example id="jdbc-ds-jndi">
<title><literal>DataSource</literal> <acronym>JNDI</acronym> Code Example</title>
<para>
Application code to initialize a pooling DataSource and add
it to <acronym>JNDI</acronym> might look like this:
<programlisting>
Jdbc3PoolingDataSource source = new Jdbc3PoolingDataSource();
source.setDataSourceName("A Data Source");
source.setServerName("localhost");
source.setDatabaseName("test");
source.setUser("testuser");
source.setPassword("testpassword");
source.setMaxConnections(10);
new InitialContext().rebind("DataSource", source);
</programlisting>
Then code to use a connection from the pool might look
like this:
<programlisting>
Connection con = null;
try {
DataSource source = (DataSource)new InitialContext().lookup("DataSource");
con = source.getConnection();
// use connection
} catch(SQLException e) {
// log error
} catch(NamingException e) {
// DataSource wasn't found in JNDI
} finally {
if(con != null) {
try {con.close();}catch(SQLException e) {}
}
}
</programlisting>
</para>
</example>
</sect2>
<sect2 id="jdbc-app-servers">
<title>Specific Application Server Configurations</title>
<para>Configuration examples for specific application servers
will be included here.</para>
</sect2>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="jdbc-reading">
<title>Further Reading</title>