From 673582d21f30871d9b5d04449e6b2b7acde69209 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 14:21:50 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Doc: Fix description of pg_class.relreplident

The description missed a comma and lacked an explanation of what happens
with REPLICA IDENTITY USING INDEX when the dependent index is dropped.

Author: Marina Polyakova
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ad1a0badc32658b1bbb07aa312346a1d@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 9.5
---
 doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml
index 0fef0ca615..7c2cef606c 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml
@@ -1939,8 +1939,10 @@ SCRAM-SHA-256$<replaceable>&lt;iteration count&gt;</replaceable>:<replaceable>&l
        Columns used to form <quote>replica identity</quote> for rows:
        <literal>d</literal> = default (primary key, if any),
        <literal>n</literal> = nothing,
-       <literal>f</literal> = all columns
-       <literal>i</literal> = index with <structfield>indisreplident</structfield> set, or default
+       <literal>f</literal> = all columns,
+       <literal>i</literal> = index with
+       <structfield>indisreplident</structfield> set (same as nothing if the
+       index used has been dropped)
       </entry>
      </row>