Doc: improve discussion of reverse+forward host name lookup in pg_hba.conf.

Fix some grammatical issues and make it a bit more readable.
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane 2014-04-01 15:20:30 -04:00
parent cfe992e7eb
commit 6eff0accfe
1 changed files with 19 additions and 18 deletions

View File

@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ hostnossl <replaceable>database</replaceable> <replaceable>user</replaceable>
<para>
If a host name is specified (anything that is not an IP address
or a special key word is processed as a potential host name),
or a special key word is treated as a host name),
that name is compared with the result of a reverse name
resolution of the client's IP address (e.g., reverse DNS
lookup, if DNS is used). Host name comparisons are case
@ -310,22 +310,28 @@ hostnossl <replaceable>database</replaceable> <replaceable>user</replaceable>
the client's host name instead of the IP address in the log.
</para>
<para>
This field only applies to <literal>host</literal>,
<literal>hostssl</literal>, and <literal>hostnossl</> records.
</para>
<sidebar>
<para>
Occasionally, users have wondered why host names are handled
in this seemingly complicated way with two name resolutions
and requiring reverse lookup of IP addresses, which is
sometimes not set up or points to some undesirable host name.
It is primarily for efficiency: A connection attempt requires
two resolver lookups of the current client's address. If
there is resolver problem with that address, it becomes only
Users sometimes wonder why host names are handled
in this seemingly complicated way, with two name resolutions
including a reverse lookup of the client's IP address. This
complicates use of the feature in case the client's reverse DNS
entry is not set up or yields some undesirable host name.
It is done primarily for efficiency: this way, a connection attempt
requires at most two resolver lookups, one reverse and one forward.
If there is a resolver problem with some address, it becomes only
that client's problem. A hypothetical alternative
implementation which only does forward lookups would have to
implementation that only did forward lookups would have to
resolve every host name mentioned in
<filename>pg_hba.conf</filename> at every connection attempt.
That would already be slow by itself. And if there is a
resolver problem with one of the host names, it becomes
everyone's problem.
<filename>pg_hba.conf</filename> during every connection attempt.
That could be quite slow if many names are listed.
And if there is a resolver problem with one of the host names,
it becomes everyone's problem.
</para>
<para>
@ -340,11 +346,6 @@ hostnossl <replaceable>database</replaceable> <replaceable>user</replaceable>
Apache HTTP Server and TCP Wrappers.
</para>
</sidebar>
<para>
This field only applies to <literal>host</literal>,
<literal>hostssl</literal>, and <literal>hostnossl</> records.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>