Mark ParallelMessagePending as sig_atomic_t
ParallelMessagePending was previously marked as a boolean which should be fine on modern platforms, but the C standard recommends the use of sig_atomic_t for variables manipulated in signal handlers. Author: Hayato Kuroda Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYAPR01MB58667C15A95A234720F4F876F5529@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
e1e6f8f3df
commit
78fdb1e50f
|
@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ typedef struct FixedParallelState
|
|||
int ParallelWorkerNumber = -1;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Is there a parallel message pending which we need to receive? */
|
||||
volatile bool ParallelMessagePending = false;
|
||||
volatile sig_atomic_t ParallelMessagePending = false;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Are we initializing a parallel worker? */
|
||||
bool InitializingParallelWorker = false;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ typedef struct ParallelWorkerContext
|
|||
shm_toc *toc;
|
||||
} ParallelWorkerContext;
|
||||
|
||||
extern PGDLLIMPORT volatile bool ParallelMessagePending;
|
||||
extern PGDLLIMPORT volatile sig_atomic_t ParallelMessagePending;
|
||||
extern PGDLLIMPORT int ParallelWorkerNumber;
|
||||
extern PGDLLIMPORT bool InitializingParallelWorker;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue