Fix trivial mistake in README.
You might think I (Robert) could manage to count to five without messing it up, but if you did, you would be wrong. Amit Kapila Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1JxqqcuC5Un7YLQVhOYSZBS+t=3xqZuEkt5RyquyuxpwQ@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
899bd785c0
commit
79a4a665c0
|
@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ concurrent scan could start in that bucket before we've finished vacuuming it.
|
|||
If a scan gets ahead of cleanup, we could have the following problem: (1) the
|
||||
scan sees heap TIDs that are about to be removed before they are processed by
|
||||
VACUUM, (2) the scan decides that one or more of those TIDs are dead, (3)
|
||||
VACUUM completes, (3) one or more of the TIDs the scan decided were dead are
|
||||
VACUUM completes, (4) one or more of the TIDs the scan decided were dead are
|
||||
reused for an unrelated tuple, and finally (5) the scan wakes up and
|
||||
erroneously kills the new tuple.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue