rdelaage
/
postgresql
mirror of https://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Revert: looks like Binary Large OBject[sic] wasn't a misspelling

This commit is contained in:
Peter Eisentraut 2010-08-17 04:47:04 +00:00
parent 5194b9d049
commit 7b243aa666
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
doc/src/sgml/lo.sgml
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/lo.sgml,v 1.5 2010/08/17 04:37:20 petere Exp $ -->
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/lo.sgml,v 1.6 2010/08/17 04:47:04 petere Exp $ -->
<sect1 id="lo">
<title>lo</title>
@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
<para>
One of the problems with the JDBC driver (and this affects the ODBC driver
also), is that the specification assumes that references to BLOBs (Binary
Large Objects) are stored within a table, and if that entry is changed, the
Large OBjects) are stored within a table, and if that entry is changed, the
associated BLOB is deleted from the database.
</para>