Fix oversight in commit 4429f6a9e3.

The test name and the following test cases suggest the index created
should be hash index, but it forgot to add 'using hash' in the test case.
This in itself won't improve code coverage as there were some other tests
which were covering the corresponding code.  However, it is better if the
added tests serve their actual purpose.

Reported-by: Paul A Jungwirth
Author: Paul A Jungwirth
Reviewed-by: Mahendra Singh
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+renyV=Us-5XfMC25bNp-uWSj39XgHHmGE9Rh2cQKMegSj52g@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
Amit Kapila 2019-09-18 09:14:26 +05:30
parent d01d4f2374
commit 84ced048d1
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ select numrange(1.0, 2.0) * numrange(2.5, 3.0);
(1 row)
create table numrange_test2(nr numrange);
create index numrange_test2_hash_idx on numrange_test2 (nr);
create index numrange_test2_hash_idx on numrange_test2 using hash (nr);
INSERT INTO numrange_test2 VALUES('[, 5)');
INSERT INTO numrange_test2 VALUES(numrange(1.1, 2.2));
INSERT INTO numrange_test2 VALUES(numrange(1.1, 2.2));

View File

@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ select numrange(1.0, 2.0) * numrange(1.5, 3.0);
select numrange(1.0, 2.0) * numrange(2.5, 3.0);
create table numrange_test2(nr numrange);
create index numrange_test2_hash_idx on numrange_test2 (nr);
create index numrange_test2_hash_idx on numrange_test2 using hash (nr);
INSERT INTO numrange_test2 VALUES('[, 5)');
INSERT INTO numrange_test2 VALUES(numrange(1.1, 2.2));