From 8b1d2685b82fd0ab09c2ba36081e53248c3b09cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heikki Linnakangas Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:08:09 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Rephrase a few comments for clarity. I was confused by what "intended to be parallel serially" meant, until Robert Haas and David G. Johnston explained it. Rephrase the comment to make it more clear, using David's suggested wording. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1fec9022-41e8-e484-70ce-2179b08c2092%40iki.fi --- src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c index 00bf3a58b1..a8d3194611 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c @@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ SeqNext(SeqScanState *node) if (scandesc == NULL) { /* - * We reach here if the scan is not parallel, or if we're executing a - * scan that was intended to be parallel serially. + * We reach here if the scan is not parallel, or if we're serially + * executing a scan that was planned to be parallel. */ scandesc = heap_beginscan(node->ss.ss_currentRelation, estate->es_snapshot,