Adjust comments that called MultiXactIds "XMIDs".

Oversights in commits 0b018fab and f3c15cbe.
This commit is contained in:
Peter Geoghegan 2022-08-29 19:42:30 -07:00
parent d5ee4db0ea
commit 9887dd38f9
3 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -7218,7 +7218,7 @@ heap_tuple_needs_eventual_freeze(HeapTupleHeader tuple)
* heap_tuple_would_freeze
*
* Return value indicates if heap_prepare_freeze_tuple sibling function would
* freeze any of the XID/XMID fields from the tuple, given the same cutoffs.
* freeze any of the XID/MXID fields from the tuple, given the same cutoffs.
* We must also deal with dead tuples here, since (xmin, xmax, xvac) fields
* could be processed by pruning away the whole tuple instead of freezing.
*

View File

@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ get_all_vacuum_rels(int options)
* oldestXmin and oldestMxact are the most recent values that can ever be
* passed to vac_update_relstats() as frozenxid and minmulti arguments by our
* vacuumlazy.c caller later on. These values should be passed when it turns
* out that VACUUM will leave no unfrozen XIDs/XMIDs behind in the table.
* out that VACUUM will leave no unfrozen XIDs/MXIDs behind in the table.
*/
bool
vacuum_set_xid_limits(Relation rel,

View File

@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ permutation
#
# This provides test coverage for code paths that are only hit when we need to
# freeze, but inability to acquire a cleanup lock on a heap page makes
# freezing some XIDs/XMIDs < FreezeLimit/MultiXactCutoff impossible (without
# freezing some XIDs/MXIDs < FreezeLimit/MultiXactCutoff impossible (without
# waiting for a cleanup lock, which non-aggressive VACUUM is unwilling to do).
permutation
dml_begin