From 98f8cdd48cc5702c0cd3ef896efb957888e848b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heikki Linnakangas Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:44:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix more race conditions in the newly-added pg_rewind test. pg_rewind looks at the control file to check what timeline a server is on. But promotion doesn't immediately write a checkpoint, it merely writes an end-of-recovery WAL record. If pg_rewind runs immediately after promotion, before the checkpoint has completed, it will think think that the server is still on the earlier timeline. We ran into this issue a long time ago already, see commit 484a848a73f. It's a bit bogus that pg_rewind doesn't determine the timeline correctly until the end-of-recovery checkpoint has completed. We probably should fix that. But for now work around it by waiting for the checkpoint to complete before running pg_rewind, like we did in commit 484a848a73f. In the passing, tidy up the new test a little bit. Rerder the INSERTs so that the comments make more sense, remove a spurious CHECKPOINT call after pg_rewind has already run, and add --debug option, so that if this fails again, we'll have more data. Per buildfarm failure at https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=rorqual&dt=2020-12-06%2018%3A32%3A19&stg=pg_rewind-check. Backpatch to all supported versions. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1713707e-e318-761c-d287-5b6a4aa807e8@iki.fi --- src/bin/pg_rewind/t/008_min_recovery_point.pl | 22 +++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/bin/pg_rewind/t/008_min_recovery_point.pl b/src/bin/pg_rewind/t/008_min_recovery_point.pl index 747134d702..411bbd1a4c 100644 --- a/src/bin/pg_rewind/t/008_min_recovery_point.pl +++ b/src/bin/pg_rewind/t/008_min_recovery_point.pl @@ -75,6 +75,13 @@ $node_1->wait_for_catchup('node_3', 'replay', $lsn); # $node_1->stop('fast'); $node_3->promote; +# Force a checkpoint after the promotion. pg_rewind looks at the control +# file to determine what timeline the server is on, and that isn't updated +# immediately at promotion, but only at the next checkpoint. When running +# pg_rewind in remote mode, it's possible that we complete the test steps +# after promotion so quickly that when pg_rewind runs, the standby has not +# performed a checkpoint after promotion yet. +$node_3->safe_psql('postgres', "checkpoint"); # reconfigure node_1 as a standby following node_3 my $node_3_connstr = $node_3->connstr; @@ -99,6 +106,8 @@ $lsn = $node_3->lsn('insert'); $node_3->wait_for_catchup('node_1', 'replay', $lsn); $node_1->promote; +# Force a checkpoint after promotion, like earlier. +$node_1->safe_psql('postgres', "checkpoint"); # # We now have a split-brain with two primaries. Insert a row on both to @@ -106,6 +115,9 @@ $node_1->promote; # see the insert on 1, as the insert on node 3 is rewound away. # $node_1->safe_psql('postgres', "INSERT INTO public.foo (t) VALUES ('keep this')"); +# 'bar' is unmodified in node 1, so it won't be overwritten by replaying the +# WAL from node 1. +$node_3->safe_psql('postgres', "INSERT INTO public.bar (t) VALUES ('rewind this')"); # Insert more rows in node 1, to bump up the XID counter. Otherwise, if # rewind doesn't correctly rewind the changes made on the other node, @@ -114,10 +126,6 @@ $node_1->safe_psql('postgres', "INSERT INTO public.foo (t) VALUES ('keep this')" $node_1->safe_psql('postgres', "INSERT INTO public.foo (t) VALUES ('and this')"); $node_1->safe_psql('postgres', "INSERT INTO public.foo (t) VALUES ('and this too')"); -# Also insert a row in 'bar' on node 3. It is unmodified in node 1, so it won't get -# overwritten by replaying the WAL from node 1. -$node_3->safe_psql('postgres', "INSERT INTO public.bar (t) VALUES ('rewind this')"); - # Wait for node 2 to catch up $node_2->poll_query_until('postgres', q|SELECT COUNT(*) > 1 FROM public.bar|, 't'); @@ -139,9 +147,10 @@ command_ok( [ 'pg_rewind', "--source-server=$node_1_connstr", - "--target-pgdata=$node_2_pgdata" + "--target-pgdata=$node_2_pgdata", + "--debug" ], - 'pg_rewind detects rewind needed'); + 'run pg_rewind'); # Now move back postgresql.conf with old settings move( @@ -153,7 +162,6 @@ $node_2->start; # Check contents of the test tables after rewind. The rows inserted in node 3 # before rewind should've been overwritten with the data from node 1. my $result; -$result = $node_2->safe_psql('postgres', 'checkpoint'); $result = $node_2->safe_psql('postgres', 'SELECT * FROM public.foo'); is($result, qq(keep this and this