Fix broken Assert() introduced by 8e9a16ab8f

Don't assert MultiXactIdIsRunning if the multi came from a tuple that
had been share-locked and later copied over to the new cluster by
pg_upgrade.  Doing that causes an error to be raised unnecessarily:
MultiXactIdIsRunning is not open to the possibility that its argument
came from a pg_upgraded tuple, and all its other callers are already
checking; but such multis cannot, obviously, have transactions still
running, so the assert is pointless.

Noticed while investigating the bogus pg_multixact/offsets/0000 file
left over by pg_upgrade, as reported by Andres Freund in
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20140530121631.GE25431@alap3.anarazel.de

Backpatch to 9.3, as the commit that introduced the buglet.
This commit is contained in:
Alvaro Herrera 2014-06-27 14:43:39 -04:00
parent 1147035203
commit b277057648
1 changed files with 7 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -5518,8 +5518,14 @@ FreezeMultiXactId(MultiXactId multi, uint16 t_infomask,
* was a locker only, it can be removed without any further
* consideration; but if it contained an update, we might need to
* preserve it.
*
* Don't assert MultiXactIdIsRunning if the multi came from a
* pg_upgrade'd share-locked tuple, though, as doing that causes an
* error to be raised unnecessarily.
*/
Assert(!MultiXactIdIsRunning(multi));
Assert((!(t_infomask & HEAP_LOCK_MASK) &&
HEAP_XMAX_IS_LOCKED_ONLY(t_infomask)) ||
!MultiXactIdIsRunning(multi));
if (HEAP_XMAX_IS_LOCKED_ONLY(t_infomask))
{
*flags |= FRM_INVALIDATE_XMAX;