From b27e1b3418b189e1a5aee13cbd09bff94f010a86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Geoghegan Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:56:56 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] nbtree: Remove obsolete _bt_pgaddtup() comments. Remove comments that are a throw back to a time when nbtree cared about write-ordering dependencies. The comments are similar to those removed by commit 9ee7414e, among others. --- src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtinsert.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtinsert.c b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtinsert.c index 2c3656c1cd..00df0e1b88 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtinsert.c +++ b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtinsert.c @@ -2531,11 +2531,6 @@ _bt_newroot(Relation rel, Buffer lbuf, Buffer rbuf) /* * _bt_pgaddtup() -- add a data item to a particular page during split. * - * This routine adds the tuple to the page as requested. It does - * not affect pin/lock status, but you'd better have a write lock - * and pin on the target buffer! Don't forget to write and release - * the buffer afterwards, either. - * * The difference between this routine and a bare PageAddItem call is * that this code knows that the leftmost data item on an internal * btree page has a key that must be treated as minus infinity.